Application of Virtual Synchronous Generator
Application of Virtual Synchronous Generator
Jianjun Su1, Wenbo Li1, Hengjie Liu2, Fanmin Meng2, Long Wang3, Xueshan
Han3
1
State Grid Shandong Electric Power Research Institute, China. 2 State Grid Laiwu
Power Supply Company, China. 3 Key Laboratory of Power System Intelligent Dispatch
and Control of Ministry of Education (Shandong University), Jinan, China.
[email protected]
Abstract. For the virtual synchronous control strategy of grid-connected inverters, the impact of
the output response of the change of source is mainly analyzed, and the response time is
calculated to lay a theoretical foundation for the system economic dispatch. First, the
photovoltaic cell model is introduced, as well as the mathematical model and control strategy of
the virtual synchronous generator. Then the optimal configuration of the source input is analyzed
under different inertia and virtual damping conditions. The results show that the virtual inertia
and damping coefficient of the inverter are closely related to the energy density and response
time of the source input. Finally, a simple simulation model is given to observe the influence of
the output change of the source on the response of the inverter output.
1. Introduction
With the large-scale consumption of new energy such as wind energy and photovoltaics, the system is
facing a series of new challenges. The virtual synchronization technology is a major technological
innovation and has been received significant attention at home and abroad recently.
An adaptive inertial control strategy is proposed that selects different rotor inertias based on the
acceleration and slip of the virtual synchronous machine and verifies the state of its negative inertia[1].
A strategy adjusting the voltage and reactive power by adding excitation links is introduced[2]. In the
literature[3], on the basis of the predecessors, the synchronverter scheme is proposed. The equivalent
structural is analyzed and mathematical equations of the inverter and the synchronous generator are
compared and analyzed. The control strategy inherited and developed and summarized the correlation
of the virtual synchronous machine theory. In Literature[4], by detecting the frequency change rate in
the transient process, the functional relationship of the frequency drop coefficient of the VSG droop is
established, and the droop coefficient is adjusted according to the change of the frequency to reduce the
frequency deviation in the transient process. Literature [5] studies the relationship between the
magnitude and frequency of virtual inertia and gives a quantitative selection method of virtual inertia.
Based on the small-signal model, the design principles of relevant parameters are proposed, and the
adaptive control of virtual inertia is studied.
This article will be based on the above introduction, first we gives the photovoltaic cell model,
introduces the basic principle of the virtual synchronous generator; then we gives the second-order
model of the virtual synchronous machine, and analyzes its response time; Finally, we gives the
simulation results, changes Irradiation and other sources of input to verify the system output response
time.
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
First International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1087 (2018)
1234567890 ‘’“” 062060 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1087/6/062060
2. Photovoltaic model
The output current of the photovoltaic cell according to the KCL law is:
I = I ph − Id − Ir
s
I ph = I sc + K0 (T − Tref )
1000
I sc (T 2) − I sc (T 1)
K0 =
T2 − T1
q ( u + iR ) / a k T
I d = I 0 (e − 1)
qEg
T 3 ak (1/Tref −1/T )
I 0 = I do ( )e
Tref
Ir = (U + IR)/ Rsh
Formula (1)~(6) is the mathematical model of single diode photovoltaic cell. Where, Isc for the short-
circuit current, A; Ido for the diode reverse current, A; S for the irradiation intensity, W / m 2 ; T for the
battery surface temperature, K ; α for the diode quality factor; q for the electronic power,
1.602 × 10 − 19 , C ; 1.38 × 10 − 2 3 for the Boltzmann constant, J / K ,; E g With energy constants, eV .
Photovoltaic cells form a photovoltaic array through series and parallel connection. The
relationship between output voltage and current is as follows:
q U IRs N p U IRs
I = N p I ph − N p I s exp ( + ) − 1 − ( + )
akT N s N p Rsh N s N p
Where, Ns represents the number of batteries in series and N p represents the number of parallel
batteries.
3. VSG model
Taking the VSG's terminal connection point as the common coupling point, the renewable energy can
be equivalent to the traditional prime mover, the energy storage unit can be equivalent to the traditional
steam engine, and the grid-connected inverter can be equivalent to the traditional synchronous generator.
Traditional synchronous generators include second-order, third-order, fifth-order, and seventh-order
mathematical models. Here, only the simplest second-order electromechanical model analysis is
considered. The key to the second-order model is the rotor motion equation and the electromagnetic
equation.
The virtual synchronous generator's virtual potential consists of three parts. E0 is the no-load voltage
of the virtual synchronous generator; the second is the reactive power regulation part E q , expressed as
2
First International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1087 (2018)
1234567890 ‘’“” 062060 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1087/6/062060
Δ E q = k q ( Q ref − Q )
Where, k q represents the reactive power adjustment coefficient; Q r e f is the reactive power
instruction of the grid-connected inverter; Q is the instantaneous reactive power value output by the
machine.
ΔEu is the output voltage of the terminal voltage regulator unit, which is equivalent to the excitation
regulator or automatic voltage regulator of the synchronous generator, which can be simplified as a
proportional element.
Δ E u = k u (U r e f − U ) ,
Where, ku indicates the voltage adjustment coefficient; U r e f and U are the command value and
the real value that represent the effective value of the terminal voltage.
The analogy of the inverter filter to the virtual impedance of the synchronous generator has some
problems. The parameter design of the filter needs to consider factors such as reactive power, voltage
drop and the like, and at the same time, parameter drift occurs, which is related to the parameter design
in the control model. There is some error.
Where, Sn represents the rated capacity of the synchronous generator: H represents the time that the
synchronous generator is at nominal torque from no-load start to the rated speed. Based on the concept
of the inertial time constant, the second-order model of the synchronous generator is obtained from the
above equation:
δ = ω0ωr
H ω r = Tm − Te − Dpωr = Pref − Pe − Dpωr
* * * *
3
First International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1087 (2018)
1234567890 ‘’“” 062060 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1087/6/062060
the system asterisk indicates the standard system, ωr = (ω −ω0 )/ ω0 indicates the speed difference;
the torque reference value is Tb = Sn / ω0 . In addition, Dp = Dω0 / Sn , the relationship between
2
It can be seen that in the case of a given active power command, SE is a constant, which the natural
oscillation angle frequency and damping coefficient of the second-order model can be derived.
4
First International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1087 (2018)
1234567890 ‘’“” 062060 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1087/6/062060
ωn = ω0 S E / H
ξ = 0.5 D 1 / (ω0 S E H )
4. Simulation
In MATLAB/Simulink, a simulation model for photovoltaic cells directly connected to the VSG is built.
The simulation parameters are shown in the table. The simulation process is as follows: 0.3s simulated
cloud shelter, lighting is reduced from 1000 W / m 2 to 350 W / m 2 , temperature is maintained at 40°C;
1.4s is simulated in the evening, light and temperature are simultaneously decreased, light is reduced
from 1000 W / m 2 to 800 W / m 2 , temperature is decreased from 40°C to 35°C , 1.8s light fell to 200
W / m 2 , the temperature dropped to 30 °C.
5
First International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1087 (2018)
1234567890 ‘’“” 062060 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1087/6/062060
It is not difficult to find from the figure that the input light and temperature changes, the uncertainty
of photovoltaic output is simulated, and the dynamic tracking response at the output end of the
photovoltaic cell exhibits certain volatility, and the voltage tracking effect is slightly different. The
power tracking effect basically conforms to the light curve. Simulation results show that the tracking
time is around 0.1. Observed from the VSG output terminal, taking the DC input as a reference, its
power tracking effect is good, and the response time is about 0.01s.
5. Conclusion
From an engineering point of view, the current photovoltaic application scenario is basically a direct
grid-connected storage without energy storage. In the foreseeable future, because the cost of energy
storage batteries is high, photovoltaic batteries directly connected to the virtual synchronous control
inverter are the most possible options. It is necessary to study the inverter tracking effect of photovoltaic
directly connected to the virtual control. From the perspective of the dynamic time, the time range of
the scheduling given by the uncertainty output at the source is analyzed, and the time reference value of
the dynamic scheduling is given.
In the next step, we will continue to use the second-order model to analyze the changes in the input
of the step at the source, the voltage response range and the power response range of the system, and
then provide the constraint range of the real-time scheduling of the inverter.
References
[1] Alipoor, J., Y. Miura and T. Ise, 2015, Power System Stabilization Using Virtual Synchronous
Generator With Alternating Moment of Inertia, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected
Topics in Power Electronics. 3(2): 451-458.
[2] Chen, Y., et al., 2012, Comparison of methods for implementing virtual synchronous machine on
inverters. Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 734-739.
[3] Zhong, Q. and G. Weiss, 2011, Synchronverters: Inverters That Mimic Synchronous Generators.
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 58(4): 1259-1267.
[4] Soni, N., S. Doolla and M.C. Chandorkar, 2013, Improvement of Transient Response in
Microgrids Using Virtual Inertia. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 28(3): 1830-1838.
[5] Cheng Chong,Yang Huan,Zeng Zheng,et al, 2015, Rotor inertia adaptive control method of
VSG, Automation of Electric Power Systems. 39(19):82-89(in Chinese)