Characteristics of Good Marketing Research
Characteristics of Good Marketing Research
CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD
MARKETING RESEARCH
There are two methods of marketing research, namely primary research or secondary market research.
While primary research seeks to understand customer motivations, opinions and needs through
quantitative and qualitative field research. In contrast to that, secondary market research uses already
existing sources of information to gather the data.
What is the Importance of Marketing Research?
To Make Marketing Decisions: Marketing research helps the marketers to make a decision about the
product or service. Sometimes a marketer might believe that the new product or service is useful for the
customers. However, research may show that customers do not need a product or are meeting their
needs with a certain competitor product and so on. Similarly good marketing research strives to provide
options for the successful introduction of new products and services. This makes the market entry of a
new product or service less risky.
Helps to Decide Target Markets: Research helps provide customer information in terms of their location,
age, buying behavior and gender. This helps the marketers zero in on the target markets and customers
for their products and services.
Maximize Profits: Apart from profit maximizing steps such as item optimization, customer profitability
analysis, and price elasticity, marketing research allows you to find out methods that can help you
maximize profits. For example, a product's price elasticity research can help you ascertain the impact of
an increased price on the sales and the profits of a product. This emphasis on profitability also helps the
company's focus to shift from maximizing sales to increasing the profits of a company. This helps the
company survive in the long run and maximize its profits.
Increasing the Sales: Increasing the sales of your products or services helps a company in maximizing
its profits. By understanding the customer's needs, wants and attitude towards the products and
determining whether your products fit the bill, marketers can increase their sales. This helps in not only
increasing the sales to the target customers and people already using the product but also converting the
non users into customers for the product.
1) Marketing research offers suggestions and not decisions:- Marketing research is not substitute for
decision making process. It only offers possible suggestion to marketing problem. It actually acts as a tool
which facilitates decision making process. It guides marketing managers in taking balanced, result oriented
and rational decisions. The suggestions offered by marketing researchers are usually possible solution but
not the exact solution.
2) Marketing research cannot predict accurately: - In MR, efforts are being made to estimate or
predict the possible future situation. For this, certain research studies are undertaken. However, the results
conclusions arrived at may not be complete, perfect or accurate. They predict possible tendencies but not
certainties.
3) MR conclusions are not dependable:- there are many who are sceptics of MR. their criticism is that
MR conclusions are not dependable. There are examples where the research failed to deliver desired result
or a product failed even when the research had shown promising market demand and consumer support.
The classical example is that coke. Its MR should that 68% customers in US liked the taste of the new
formula developed by the coca-cola corporation. However, the new coke failed and in less than six months
of its launch, the coke management had to relaunch old coke under the brand name coke classic. However,
this failure of MR was mainly due to conventional approach.
4) Marketing research cannot study all marketing problem:- marketing research is rather very wide in
scope. However, it cannot study all marketing problem particularly where it is difficult to collect relevant
data. Similarly, research study is not useful for dealing with urgent marketing problem where quick
decisions and follow up actions are necessary. Thus, all marketing problem are not researchable and all
research problem are not answerable. MR fails to offer guidance to manager while dealing with specific
problem. It is also argued that very many times, marketing research faced by a business unit marketing
research tends to be fragmentary in its approach it become difficult to have an overall perspective in which a
marketing problem is to be viewed and studied.
5) Resistance by marketing executives: researchers study the marketing problems and offers
information and guidance to marketing executives in their decision-making process. However, some
executives are reluctant to use the solutions suggested by the researchers. They feel that such extensive
use will act as a threat to their personal status. Findings of the research work may bring them in difficulties
if the policy-decisions taken accordingly prove to be wrong.
7) Marketing research is a costly affair: marketing research is a costly as research work require the
service of expert with knowledge, maturity and skill. Such experts include economists, management
scientists, statisticians, psychologists and computer experts. Advance training in economics, computer
technology, psychology, sociology, etc. is also necessary on the part of research staff.
8) Non-availability of qualified staff: For scientific MR, professional marketing researcher with proper
qualification, training and experience are necessary. Research work is likely to be incomplete in the absence
of such expert staff.
9) Complexity of subject: marketing research fails to give complete and full-proof solution to
management. This is because marketing research itself is not an exact science. It is concerned with the
study of human beings and human behaviour is always difficult to predict.
10) Changing behaviour of consumers: Consumer is a focal point in the market research. However, his
buying motives are difficult to judge precisely and accurately. This brings some sort of uncertainty in the
conclusion drawn from the research activity. The findings of the research work may not prove to be
accurate.
Benefits of MIS
1)helps to recognise market trends: MIS helps managers to recognise market trends, in respect of
price, designs of products, fashions, etc. timely information of the market trend enables the firm to
follow the right course of action.
2)facilitates marketing planning and control: effective marketing planning is required in terms of
product planning, pricing, promotion and distribution. such planning will be possible only if the
company is possessing adequate and relevant information. this is also possible through MIS.
3)quick supply of information: today a firm has to take quick decisions. for this purpose it requires
fast flow of information which is facilitated by a properly designed MIS.
4)improves quality of decision making: a properly designed MIS supplies reliable and relevant
information. with the help of computers and other data processing equipments, the marketing
managers can make the right decisions at the rught time.
The steps in the design process interact and often occur simultaneously. For example, the design of a
measurement instrument is influenced by the type of analysis that will be conducted. However, the type of
analysis is also influenced by the specific characteristics of the measurement instrument.
The basis goal of problem clarification is to ensure that the decision maker’s initial description of the
management decision is accurate and reflects the appropriate area of concern for research. If the wrong
management problem is translated into a research problem, the probability of providing management
with useful information is low.
Situation Analysis
The situation analysis focuses on the variables that have produced the stated management problem or
opportunity. The factors that have led to the problem/opportunity manifestations and the factors that
have led to management’s concern should be isolated.
A situation analysis of the retail trade outflow problem revealed, among other things, that (1) the local
population had grown 25 percent over the previous five years, (2) buying power per capita appeared to be
growing at the national rate of 3 percent a year, and (3) local retail sales of nongrocery items had
increased approximately 20 percent over the past five years. Thus, the local retailers sales are clearly not
keeping pace with the potential in the area.
II. Attitude Scales – a formalized instrument for eliciting self-reports of beliefs and feelings concerning an
object(s).
A. Rating Scales – require the respondent to place the object being rated at some point along a
numerically valued continuum or in one of a numerically ordered series of categories.
B. Composite Scales – require the respondents to express a degree of belief concerning various attributes
of the object such that the attitude can be inferred from the pattern of responses.
C. Perceptual maps – derive the components or characteristics an individual uses in comparing similar
objects and provide a score for each object on each characteristic.
D. Conjoint analysis – derive the value an individual assigns to various attributes of a product.
I. Observation – the direct examination of behavior, the results of behavior, or physiological changes.
II. Projective Techniques and Depth Interview – designed to gather information that respondents are
either unable or unwilling to provide in response to direct questioning.
A. Projective Techniques – allow respondents to project or express their own feelings as a characteristic of
someone or something else.
B. Depth Interviews – allow individuals to express themselves without any fear of disapproval, dispute, or
advice from the interviewer.
Qualitative research is a set of research techniques, used in marketing and the social sciences, in which data are obtained
from a relatively small group of respondents and not analyzed with statistical techniques. This differentiates it
from quantitative research in which a large group of respondents provides data that is statistically analyzed.
Qualitative research methods are used primarily as a prelude to quantitative research. They are used to define a problem,
generate hypotheses, identify determinants, and develop quantitative research designs. They are inexpensive and fast.
Because of the low number of respondents involved, these exploratory research methods cannot be used to generalize to
the whole population. They are however, very valuable for exploring an issue and are used by almost all researchers.
They can be better than quantitative research at probing below the surface for affective drives and subconscious
motivations.
2 Approaches
Most qualitative methods use a direct approach : they clearly disclose the purpose of the study and the organization that
commissioned it. Questions are direct and to the point. Many other qualitative techniques use an indirect approach. The true
intent of the research is disguised, either by claiming a false purpose or by omitting any reference to the study’s purpose.
Some researchers have ethical misgivings about the deceit involved in this approach. Those researchers that use this
approach feel that it provides the more honest and accurate responses. If disguised methods are used, all respondents
should, on completion, attend a debriefing session in which the true purpose of the research is given and the reason for the
deception explained.
Depth Interviews
o interview is conducted one-on-one, and lasts between 30 and 60 minutes
o best method for in-depth probing of personal opinions, beliefs, and values
o very rich depth of information
o very flexible
o probing is very useful at uncovering hidden issues
o they are unstructured (or loosely structured)- this differentiates them from survey interviews in which the
same questions are asked to all respondents
o can be time consuming and responses can be difficult to interpret
o requires skilled interviewers - expensive - interviewer bias can easily be introduced
o there is no social pressure on respondents to conform and no group dynamics
o start with general questions and rapport establishing questions, then proceed to more
purposive questions
o laddering is a technique used by depth interviewers in which you start with questions about external
objects and external social phenomena, then proceed to internal attitudes and feelings
o hidden issue questioning is a technique used by depth interviewers in which they concentrate on
deeply felt personal concerns and pet peeves
o symbolic analysis is a technique used by depth interviewers in which deeper symbolic meanings are
probed by asking questions about their opposites
Focus Groups
o an interactive group discussion lead by a moderator
o unstructured (or loosely structured) discussion where the moderator encourages the free flow of ideas
o usually 8 to 12 members in the group
o usually last for 1 to 2 hours
o usually recorded on video
o the room usually has a large window with one-way glass - participants cannot see out, but the
researchers can see in
o inexpensive and fast
o can use computer and internet technology for on-line focus groups
o respondents feel a group pressure to conform
o group dynamics is useful in developing new streams of thought and covering an issue thoroughly
o see focus group for a more detailed description
Projective Techniques
o these are unstructured prompts or stimulus that encourage the respondent to project their underlying
motivations, beliefs, attitudes, or feelings onto an ambiguous situation
o they are all indirect techniques that attempt to disguise the purpose of the research
o examples of projective techniques include:
word association - say the first word that comes to mind after hearing a word - only some of the
words in the list are test words that the researcher is interested in, the rest are fillers - is useful
in testing brand names - variants include chain word association and controlled word
association
sentence completion - respondents are given incomplete sentences and asked to complete
them
story completion - respondents are given part of a story and are asked to complete it
cartoon tests - pictures of cartoon characters are shown in a specific situation and with dialogue
balloons - one of the dialogue balloons is empty and the respondent is asked to fill it in
thematic apperception tests - respondents are shown a picture (or series of pictures) and asked
to make up a story about the picture(s)
role playing - respondents are asked to play the role of someone else - researchers assume
that subjects will project their own feelings or behaviours into the role
third-person technique - a verbal or visual representation of an individual and his/her situation is
presented to the respondent - the respondent is asked to relate the attitudes or feelings of that
person - researchers assume that talking in the third person will minimize the social pressure to
give standard or politically correct responses
Qualitative Quantitative
Subjective - individuals�
Objective � seeks precise
interpretation of events is
measurement & analysis of
important ,e.g., uses
target concepts, e.g., uses
participant observation, in-
surveys, questionnaires etc.
depth interviews etc.
(the two quotes are from Miles & Huberman (1994, p. 40). Qualitative
Data Analysis)
Main Points
Qualitative research involves analysis of data such as
words (e.g., from interviews), pictures (e.g., video), or
objects (e.g., an artifact).
Quantitative research involves analysis of numerical
data.
The strengths and weaknesses of qualitative and
quantitative research are a perennial, hot debate,
especially in the social sciences. The issues invoke classic
'paradigm war'.
The personality / thinking style of the researcher
and/or the culture of the organization is under-recognized
as a key factor in preferred choice of methods.
Overly focusing on the debate of
"qualitative versus quantitative" frames the methods in
opposition. It is important to focus also on how the
techniques can be integrated, such as in mixed methods
research. More good can come of social science
researchers developing skills in both realms than debating
which method is superior.
Introduction
Nonparametric tests are sometimes called distribution free statistics because they do
not require that the data fit a normal distribution. More generally, nonparametric tests
require less restrictive assumptions about the data. Another important reason for using
these tests is that they allow for the analysis of categorical as well as rank data.
1. Why Not Used All the Time?
Since nonparametric tests require fewer assumptions and can be used with a
broader range of data types, the question becomes, "Why not use them all of
the time?" Parametric tests are often preferred because:
1. They are robust.
2. They have greater power efficiency, in other words, they have
greater power relative to the sample size.
3. They provide unique information (e.g., the interaction in a factorial
design).
4. Parametric and nonparametric tests often address two different types
of questions.
Parametric Non-parametric
Tests
Choosing parametric Choosing a non-
Choosing
test parametric test
Independent Independent-
Mann-Whitney test
measures, 2 groups measures t-test
One-way,
Independent
independent- Kruskal-Wallis test
measures, >2 groups
measuresANOVA
Repeated measures,
Matched-pair t-test
2 conditions Wilcoxon test
As the table shows, there are different tests for parametric and non-parametric data.
McNemar's test
In statistics, McNemar's test is a non-parametric method used on nominal data. It is applied to
2 × 2 contingency tables with a dichotomous trait, with matched pairs of subjects, to determine whether
the row and column marginal frequencies are equal ("marginal homogeneity"). It is named after Quinn
McNemar, who introduced it in 1947.
The McNemar test assesses the significant difference between the two types of dependent samples in cases where
the variables of the interest is dichotomous. The McNemar test is basically used by the researcher during the pre and
the post studies in order to test for an experimental type of effect. The Marginal homogeneity test introduced for
testing the significance of two dependent samples is nothing but an extended form of the McNemar test.
Example
In the following example, a researcher attempts to determine if a drug has an effect on a particular
disease. Counts of individuals are given in the table, with the diagnosis (disease:present or absent)
before treatment given in the rows, and the diagnosis after treatment in the columns. The test requires the
same subjects to be included in the before-and-after measurements (matched pairs).
Before: presen
101 121 222
t
Before: absent 59 33 92
In this example, the null hypothesis of "marginal homogeneity" would mean there was no effect of the
treatment. From the above data, the McNemar test statistic
has the value 21.01, which is extremely unlikely from the distribution implied by the null hypothesis.
Thus the test provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no treatment effect.
sign test
In statistics, the sign test can be used to test the hypothesis that there is "no difference in medians"
between the continuous distributions of two random variables X and Y, in the situation when we can
draw paired samples from X and Y. It is a non-parametric test which makes very few assumptions
about the nature of the distributions under test - this means that it has very general applicability but
may lack the statistical power of other tests such as the paired-samplesT-test.
The sign test is probably the simplest of all the nonparametric methods. It is used to
compare a single sample with some hypothesized value, and it is therefore of use in
those situations in which the one-sample or paired t-test might traditionally be applied.
THE METHOD
The Mann-Whitney U-test is used to test whether two independent samples of observations are
drawn from the same or identical distributions. An advantage with this test is that the two
samples under consideration may not necessarily have the same number of observations.
This test is based on the idea that the particular pattern exhibited when ‘m’ number of X
random variables and ‘n’ number of Y random variables are arranged together in increasing
order of magnitude provides information about the relationship between their parent
populations.
The Mann-Whitney test criterion is based on the magnitude of the Y’s in relation to the X’s, i.e.
the position of Y’s in the combined ordered sequence. A sample pattern of arrangement where
most of the Y’s are greater than most of the X’s or vice versa would be evidence against random
mixing. This would tend to discredit the null hypothesis of identical distribution.
ASSUMPTIONS
The test has two important assumptions. First the two samples under consideration are
random, and are independent of each other, as are the observations within each sample.
Second the observations are numeric or ordinal (arranged in ranks).
HOW TO CALCULATE THE MANN-WHITNEY U
In order to calculate the U statistics, the combined set of data is first arranged in ascending
order with tied scores receiving a rank equal to the average position of those scores in the
ordered sequence.
Let T denote the sum of ranks for the first sample. The Mann-Whitney test statistic is then
calculated using U = n1 n2 + {n1 (n1 + 1)/2} – T , where n1 and n2 are the sizes of the first and
second samples respectively.
AN EXAMPLE
An example can clarify better. Consider the following samples.
Sample A
Observation 25 25 19 21 22 19 15
Sample B
Observation 18 14 13 15 17 19 18 20 19
We next compare the value of calculated U with the value given in the Tables of Critical Values
for the Mann-Whitney U-test, where the critical values are provided for given n 1 and n2 , and
accordingly accept or reject the null hypothesis. Even though the distribution of U is known,
the normal distribution provides a good approximation in case of large samples.