Operation and Control in Power Systems by PSR Murty Wwweeeunive
Operation and Control in Power Systems by PSR Murty Wwweeeunive
net
ww
w.E
asy
En
gin
eer
ing
.ne
t
ww
w.E
a syE
ngi
nee
rin
g .ne
t
ww
w.E
Prof. P. S. R. MURTY
asy B.Sc. (Engg.) (Hans.) ME.,
Dr. - lng (Berlin), F.I.E. (India)
En
Life Member - ISTE
gi
(Formerly Principal O.U. College of Engineering &
nee
Dean, Faculty of Engineering, O.U. Hyderabad)
r ing
. net
BSP BS Publications
=== 4-4-309, Giriraj Lane, Sultan Bazar,
Hyderabad - 500 095 A.P.
Phone: 040 - 23445688
No part of this book or parts thereof may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system
or transmitted in any language or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
i photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the
~ublishers.
ww
Published by :
w.E
SSP BS Publications
asy
4-4-309, Giriraj Lane, Sultan Bazar,
Hyderabad - 500 095 A. P.
E
Phone: 040 - 23445688, Fax: 91 +40-23445611
ngi
e-mail: [email protected]
nee
rin
Printed at
g. net
Adithya Art Printers
Hyderabad.
ISBN: 978-81-7800-181-0
ww
w.E Contents
asy
En
gin
1 Introduction
ee
2 Load Flow Analysis rin
2.1 g.n
Bus Classification ............................................................................................... 9
2.2
2.3
e
Modelling for Load Flow Studies ...................................................................... 10
Gauses - Seidel Iterative Method ...................................................................... 13 t
2.4 Newton - Raphson Method .............................................................................. 16
2.4.1 Rectangular Coordinates Method ..................................................... 17
2.4.2 The Polar Coordinates Method ........................................................ 19
2.5 Sparsity of Network Admittance Matrices ........................................................ 22
2.6 Triangular Decompostion .................................................................................. 23
2.7 Optimal Ordering ............................................................................................... 25
2.8 Decoupled Methods ........................................................................................... 27
(xiI) Contents
w.E
Problems ......................... ................... .... ..... ................................... ................. 72
3.1 asy
3 Economic Operation of Power Systems
Characteristics of Steam Plants ........................................................................ 86
3.2
En
Input Output Curves ......................................................................................... 87
3.3
3.4
3.5
gi
The Incremental Heat Rate Characteristic ........................................................ 88
nee
The Incremental Fuel Cost Characteristic ........................................................ 88
Heat Rate Characteristic .................................................................................... 89
3.6
3.7
r ing
Incremental Production Cost Characteristics ................................................... 89
Characteristics of Hydro Plants ........................................................................ 90
3.8
3.9
.
Incremental Water Rate Characteristics ............................................................ 91
Incremental Production Cost Characteristic ..................................................... 92 net
3.10 Generating Costs at Thermal Plants .................................................................. 93
3.11 Analytical Form for Input-Output Characteristics of Thermal Units ................ 93
3.12 Constraints in Operation .................................................................................... 94
3.13 Plant Scheduling Methods ................................................................................. 96
3.14 Merit Order Method .......................................................................................... 97
3.15 Equal Incremental Cost Method: Transmission Losses Neglected .................. 97
3.16 Transmission Loss Formula - B. Coefficients .................................................. 99
3.17 Active Power Scheduling ................................................................................. 103
3.18 Penalty Factor .................................................................................................. 106
3.19 Evaluation ofl for Computation ....................................................................... 107
(xfu) Contents
w.E
Problems ........................................................................................................ 152
nee
Lagrange Function for Optimal Load Flow ..................................................... 158
Computational Procedures ................................................................ _............. 159
4.6
rin
Conditions for Optimal Load Flow ................................................................... 159
4.7
g.n
Implementation of optimal conditions .............................................................. 161
Questions ........................................................................................................ 168
et
Problems ........................................................................................................ 169
5 Unit Commitment
5.1 Cost Function Formulation .............................................................................. 171
5.2 Constraints for Plant Commitment Schedules ................................................. 173
5.3 Priority - List Method ......................................................................................·174
5.4 Dynamic Programming .................................................................................... t:z5
5.5 Unit Commitment by Dynamic Programming ................................................. 177
Questions ........................................................................................................ 180
Problems ........................................................................................................ 180
Contents
Contents
w.E
7 Control of Interconnected Systems
7. 1
7.2
a syE
Interconnected Operation ................................................................................. 241
Flat Frequency Control of Interconnected Stations ......................................... 241
7.3
ngi
Flat Tie-Line and Flat Frequency Control ........................................................ 244
7.4
7.5 nee
Tie-Line Bias Control ........................................................................................ 247
Complete Tie-Line Bias Control ....................................................................... 250
7.6
rin
Two Area System - Tie-Line Power Model ..................................................... 253
7.7
g.n
Block Diagram for Two Area System .............................................................. 254
7.8
7.9
7.10
Analysis of Two Area System .......................................................................... 255
et
Dynamic Response ........................................................................................... 257
Tie-Line Bias Control- Implementation ........................................................... 266
7.11 The Effect of Bias Factor on System Regulation ............................................ 267
7.12 Scope for Supplementary Control .................................................................... 269
7.13 State Variable Model for a Three Area System ................................................. 269
7.14 State Variable Model for a Two Area System ................................................... 274
7.15 State Variable Model for a Single Area System ................................................ 275
7.16 Model Reduction and Decentralised Control .................................................. ,284
Questions ........................................................................................................ 287
Problems ........................................................................................................ 288
(XVl) Contents
w.E
8.8
8.9
Static Excitation System .................................................................................. 300
Brushless Excitation Scheme ........................................................................... 301
8.10
8.11 aAutomatic Voltage Regulators for Alternators .................................................. 302
syE
Analysis of Generator Voltage Control ............................................................. 303
8.12
8.13 ngi
Steady State Performance Evaluation .............................................................. 306
Dynamic Response of Voltage Regulation Control ........................................... 306
8.14 nee
Stability Compensation for Voltage Control ..................................................... 307
8.15
rin
Stabilizing Transformer .................................................................................... 307
8.16
8.17 g.n
Voltage Regulators ............................................................................................ 309
ieee Type 1 Excitation System ......................................................................... 310
8.18
8.19
et
Power System Stabilizer .................................................................................. 313
Reactive Power Generation by Turbo Generator ............................................. 314
8.20 Synchronous Compensators ............................................................................ 314
8.21 Reactors 315
8.22 Capacitors315
8.23 Tap---Changing Transformers ........................................................................... 316
8.24 Tap-Staggering Method ................................................................................... 317
8.25 Voltage Regulation and Short Circuit Capacity ................................................. 318
8.26 Loading Capability of a Line ............................................................................. 320
8.27 Compensation in Power Systems ..................................................................... 320
(xviI) Contents
9.1
w.E
9 Introduction to Advanced Topics
Facts Controllers .............................................................................................. 346
asy
9.1.1 Series Controllers ............................................................................ 346
En
9.1.2 Shunt Controller .............................................................................. 347
9.1.3 Series - Series Controllers .............................................................. 347
9.1.5
gi
9.1.4 Series - Shunt Controllers .............................................................. 348
nee
Power Flow Control ...................................................................... 348
r
9.1.6 Static Var Compensator(SVC) ........................................................ 349
ing
9.1.7 Unified Power Flow Controller ....................................................... 349
9.2 .
9.1.8 Advantages due to FACTS devices ................................................. 349
net
Voltage Stability ................................................................................................ 350
9.3 Power Quality ................................................................................................... 352
9.3.1 Power Quality Index ....................................................................... 353
9.3.2 Voltage Sags .................................................................................... 353
9.3.3 Rectifier Loads ................................................................................ 355
9.3.4 Flicker ............................................................................................. 355
9.3.5 Power Acceptability or Voltage Tolerance ....................................... 356
9.3.6 Solutions to Power Quality.problem ............................................... 356
9.4 Data Base for Control ....................................................................................... 357
9.5 State Estimation ................................................................................................ 358
9.6 Power System Security .................................................................................... 360
(xviii) Contents
syE
Peak Power Demand Prediction ....................................................................... 378
9.19
9.20 ngi
State Estimation in Load Forecasting ............................................................... 379
Generating Capacity Reliability and Outage Probabilities ................................. 380
nee
Questions ........................................................................................................ 386
rin
Objective Questions .......................................................................... 387
ww
w.E
1 INTRODUCTION
asy
En
gin
Elecrical energy is the most popular form of energy, because it can be transported easily at
high efficiency and reasonable costs. Thomas Edison, established the first power station in
eer
1882 at New York city, United States of America. The lower Manhattan area was supplied DC
power from this station. Underground cables were used for distribution. At Appelton, Wisconcin
ing
the first water wheel generator was installed. Under Edison's patents several companies started
functioning in USA. However, these companies could supply energy to small distances due to
I2R power loss being excessive at low voltage distribution.
.
In 1885, Wililiam Stanley invented the transformer. which revolutionized the AC net
transmission. The invention of induction motor in 1888 by Nnikola Tesla caused dramatic
change in electrical power consumption through AC replacing many DC motor loads.
It is now an acknowledged fact that HV and EHV transmission alone can reduce
substantially the losses and bulk power transmission is feasible at these voltages. Nevertheless,
it is also well established that HVDC is convenient and more economical from operation and
control point of view under certain circumstances such as at distances of more than 500 kms.
A detailed discussion of this aspect is not within the purview of this book.
In India, two third of the electrical power generated is from coal based power stations.
Of the rest, about 24% comes from hydroelectric, 8.7% from Gas fired plants, 2.4% from
nuclear power plants. At the time of independence, the per capita consumption of electric
energy was 1.3 units. It is now about 3 units while China's per capita consumption is about 6
units. Developed countries have per capita consumptions of as high as 8,500 units. This
shows the great disparity that exists between the rich and the poor countries. However, Indian
Power Sector has undergone revolutionary changes. While in 1947 the installed capacity was
at 1300 MW, today it has surpassed 1,00,000 MW. In India, Nuclear Power has a target of
350 GW, and Hydro Power is estimated at 84 GW by CEA.
In India regional and national power grids are established to facilitate transfer of power
within and across the regions with reliability, security and economy on sound commercial
principles. The Power Grid Corporation was established in August 1991 and it started its
commercial operations from 1992-93. It is one of the largest transmission utilities in the
ww
world. The power grid is an ISO 9001 company with complete capability in AC transmission
upto 765 kV level and HVDC transmission upto ± 500 kV. Challenging jobs in operation and
w.E
maintenance of the national demand which is expected to reach a peak value of 114000 MW by
2006 are undertaken by Power Grid Corporation. Power Grid is also engaged in activities such
asy
as unified load dispatch which facilitates close monitoring of grid with real time data for
economic dispatch of power between the five regional grids and states.
En
Planning,design, operation, control and protection of power systems requires continuous
and comprehensive anatysisJo_e~aluate the current states and remedial control, if any, needed.
gi
Manual computation of power flows isexrremely time consuming even for very simple networks.
nee
In 1929, AC network analyzer, an analog computer was devised. Most of the early system
studies were performed on the network analyzer.
r ing
The Indian Power Grid System is divided into five regional grids. The southern region
comprises of Andhra Pradesh, Tamilnadu, Karnataka, Kerala and Pondichery. All these State
.
Electricity Boards are integrated for operation into Southern Regional Electricity Board.
net
Likewise, other boards are formed. Each state has inter State and Inter Regional links. For
example Andhra Pradesh and Maharastra have a tie-line at Ramagundam - Chandrapur 400 kV
link at Chandrapur.
In a similar way Andhra Pradesh has tie-line connections with Orissa, Madhaya Pradesh,
Tamilnadu and Karnataka.
The stipulated system frequency in India is 50 Hz. Since, there is deficit of generation
in the southern region, the operating frequency goes to 48.5 Hz. States like, Maharastra,
Madhyapradesh, and Orissa operate at 50 to 52 Hz. Andhra Pradesh imports power through
HVDC back to back system at Chandrapur through the 400 kV AC double circuit line from
Chandrapur-Ramagundam. In a similar way, through the HVDC back to back system at Gajuwaka
power is transmitted via 400..kV Jaypore-Gajuwaka double circuit AC line from Orissa.
While, we have dealt with the frequency scenario, it is worthwhile, to look at the other
performance index of electric power, the voltage profile. 400 kV lines have their voltage falling
to 340.3 kV at Cuddapah, 220 kV lines reaching 160.8 kV at Sullurpet and 132 kV lines
operating at 95.8 kV at Nagarkurnool.
Introduction 3
From the above, it can be seen that there is very heavy demand for electric power in this
areas seriously compromising the power quality. While more generation is needed to be added
continuously a thorough knowledge of various aspects involved in the study of power system
operation and control is very essential for electric power engineers. This book is dedicated to
this task in a manner that students of power engineering grasp the essential concepts involved
in operation and control.
The system variables are continuously changing in both magnitude and number. The
system never reaches a steady state so as to permit any tests to be carried out on it, so that its
dynamic behaviour can be ascertained. In practice, it requires both continuous and discrete
controls. The spread of the power systems over vast geographical areas contributes to its
ww
vulnerability to environmental changes. The system's dynamics extends over a broad band
width ranging from micro seconds to several minutes.
w.E
Planning operation and control of isolated or inter connected power systems present a
large variety of challenging problems, the solution of which requires application of several
a
mathematical techniques from various branches of it. Knowledge of optimization techniques
syE
and optimal control methods is very essential to understand the multi level approach that has
been very successfully utilized. Various mathematical techniques that needed to be applied are
ngi
explained at the appropriate places while dealing with the subject.
nee
Power system engineering is a branch where practically all the results of modern control
theory can be applied. Such an application will result in economy, better quality of service and
rin
the least inconvenience under abnormal situations, both anticipated and unforeseen.
g.n
Control system design, in general, for its analytical treatment, requires the determination
of a mathematical model from which the control strategy can be derived. While much of the
suitable technique to determine the models for the process to be controlled. Thus, it is
required to model and identify power system components using both physical relationships
et
control theory postulates that a model of the system is available. It is also necessary to have a
and experimental or normal operating data. The objective of system identification is the
determination of a mathematical model characterizing the operation of a system in some form.
The available information is either system outputs or some functions of outputs which may
contain measurement noise. The inputs may be known functions applied for the purpose of
identification, or unknown functions which it may be possible to monitor somehow, or a
combination of both.
The identified model may be in the form of differential equations, difference equations,
transfer functions, etc.
Even though all systems are nonlinear to some extent, the assumption of a linear model
leads to simpler models which can yield meaningful results with fairly good accuracy. A
system may be classified as stationary or non stationary. During the period of operation, when
controls are implemented, the system is normally assumed to be stationary. The system equations
may be formulated either in the continuous mode or in the discrete mode. While measurements
and predicted values are available at discrete intervals, continuous representation is the most
familiar mode. Transformation from continuous to discrete formulation is a straight forward
process. A power system invariably, is stochastic in nature since the load demand is the most
uncertain aspect in the operation of it. In addition, measurement uncertainty, errors, non
availability of readings, etc. all contribute to its stochastic nature in the model. In most of the
power system studies only a deterministic model is assumed, but when the situation demands
the probabilistic model is also used. A modern power system required identification of the
model and optimization of the same with reference to a performance criterion with computer
ww
predictive, adaptive, non interacting, sampled-data control for efficient operation.
Various models that are needed in analysis and for control are discussed and presented
w.E
through out the book.
Chapter 2 deals with load flow studies. They are performed to determine voltages,
asy
active and reactive powers, etc. at various points in the network for different operating conditions
subject to the constraints on generator capacities and specified net interchange between operating
En
systems and several other restraints. Load flow solution is essential for continuous evaluation
of the performance of the power systems so that suitable control measures can be taken in
variety of conditions. gi
case of necessity. In practice it will be required to carry out numerous load flows under a
nee
Economic system operation can be defined in a more general sense as making the best
rin
use of the resources available, subject to a variety of requirements over any desired period of
g.n
time. Economic power system operation deals with the means and techniques for achieving
minimum operating cost to supply a given predicted load demand. It may be pointed out that
et
extensive research has been carried out in this field covering topics such as economy of fuel,
maintenance and overhaul schedules of equipment, starting and shut-down of generating plants,
scheduling of generation to different units, exchange of power between neighbouring utilities
and a wide range of problems related to hydrogeneration, like water usage, policies for different
types of hydro plants (reservoir, pondage, run-off river and pumped storage) and their integration
with the system, both hydraulically and electrically. Different combinations of thermal and
hydrogenerating plants give rise to different cost structures. Also, for a given combination of
plants, the operational requirement of scheduling generating plants to supply the predicted load
demand and subsequent formulation of loading pattern to be imposed on individual units
committed to service to minimize the cost of supplying a given load is another important aspect
of the problem. In general, the ordering or committing plant to operate on one hand and
loading of plant in operation on the other are the two facets of the economic operation, both
considered separately in Chapter 3 and 4.
The division is mainly from the period_of time over which cost minimization is affected.
The loading of plant in operation'is related to'Cost minimization over short periods of time.
Introduction 5
.
w.E
(d) Tie-line interchange, system frequency control Seconds
asy
(e) Plant and unit control Continuous
In Chapter 5 optimal load flow problem and certain guide lines to obtain an optimal
E
solution are presented, but the information is only at an introductory level.
ngi
There are several problems associated with hydrothermal combined operation such as:
nee
1. Fuel ordering, i.e., given the operating pattern over the period of interest (say two
weeks), determine the station fuel requirements and the optimal fuel procurement
policy.
rin
2. Plant ordering or unit commitment, i.e., the scheduling of the start up and shut
down of generating units, a dynamic optimization problem.
g.n
3. Hydrothermal scheduling, i.e., the optimal use of available water to coordinate
with the thermal generation, a dynamic optimization problem, etc.
et
The economic objective of a schedule can be assumed either by the profit from energy
sales or by the cost of energy production. If the loads are fixed, then both the criteria result in
the same schedule. However, under more realistic circumstances, i.e., when load is a function
ofa voltage, the two criteria yield different optimal policies. Minimization of production costs
is taken generaHy as the criterion for economic operation.
Each minimization problem is subject to a number of constraints arising from the
characteristics of plants and their safe operating conditions and from the requirements of
technically favourable operating conditions in the transmission system interconnecting various
power stations. The requirements of security are superimposed on these constraints. Added
to these are the requirements of marginal or reserve generating capacity in excess of the
minimum necessary to supply a predicted load demand to complement the probabilistic nature
of load predicted and to cover unforeseen operational occurrences. A wide number of
formulations and analytical solution techniques have been pursued in this direction. A few
important methods only are discussed in Chapters 3, 4 and S.
ww 1. Nonnal mode
2. Preventive mode
w.E
3. Emergency mode, and
4. Restorative mode.
asy
In the nonnal mode of operation, the system has to maintain scheduled voltages, frequency
and load flow profile maintaining the scheduled tie line power flows. In this mode of operation
control is required to
En
I. Maintain scheduled voltages and frequency
gi
2. Maintain scheduled tie-line flows, and
3. Obtain economic generation
nee
In the emergency mode of operation, i.e., when the contingency has occurred, control
is required to
I. Maintain the specified frequency, and
r ing
2. Maximize the amount of load demand being met.
. net
During the restorative mode of operation, the system is brought from emergency mode
of operation into either nonnal mode or preventive mode.
The most important aspect in any mode of operation is the matching between load
demand and generation. The frequency deviation of the system is a direct measure of the
mismatch between the total generation and combined load demand. It is only when the frequency
is maintained at the rated value that the generation balances the load demand. An accelerating
frequency means that the generation is high while a decelerating freqttency indicates insufficient
generation.
A transmission line may be a connection between a generating station to a system or
may be an inter-tie between two large systems.
Assuming the line losses to be negligible, it can be proved that a more or less natural
way of operating a transmission line would be to seek to maintain the voltage levels through
regulating the reactive power flow and to provide for the variations of the active power demand
IntrtJduction 7
by allowing the phase angle between the two end voltages 0, to change. This is brought about
by adjusting the throttle ofthe prime movers in the generating stations at one end or both ends
of the line. The pewer transfer over the line is given by
p=VsVRSino
XL
where Vs and V Rare sending end and receiving end voltage magnitudes respectively.
By slowly increasing the load, the maximum power transfer can be obtained when
o ~ 90°. Further, increase in load will not increase the power transmitted, but instead decreases
it. This point is referred to as the static stability limit or static transmission capacity of the line.
ww
This capacity can, of course, be increased by increasing the voltage magnitudes, but there are
limits for this increase.
w.E
The incremental increase in transmitted power ~p caused by a small increment ~o in
the phase angle is a measure of the electrical stiffness of the transmission line. The quantity
(~)
asy
is also called synchronizing coefficient.
E ngi
It can be seen that the transmission capacity can be increased also by reducing the
effective reactance of the line. This can be achieved by paralleling the lines, using bundled
conductors or inserting series capacitors.
nee
The analysis, operation and control of inter connected power systems or simply areas
rin
are discussed comprehensively in Chapter 7. The objective of system voltage control is to
maintain a satisfactory voltage profile in the system during both periods of maximum and
g.n
minimum loadings. A detailed analysis of excitation control and means adopted for reactive
power generation in addition to synchronous machine are presented in Chapter 8.
var compensators etc., are discussed in Chapter 8. The role of a power system stabilizer is
also presented.
et
Various devices such as tap changers, reactors, capacitors, induction regulators static
In Chapter 9, certain advanced topics that are related to operation and control are
introduced. These are, state estimation, FACTS controllers, Voltage stability, Power quality,
load prediction, energy control centers etc. The inclusion of the topics and the presentation of
the information is by no means exhaustive.
ww
w
2 LOAD
.EaFLOW ANALYSIS
syE
ngi
Load Flow or Power Flow is the solution for the Power System under static conditions of
nee
operation. Load Flow studies are undertaken to determine:
rin
I. The line flows
2. The bus voltages and system voltage profile
g .ne
3. The effect of changes in circuit configuration, and incorporating new circuits on
system loading
are of analogue type, scaled down miniature models of power systems with resistances,
reactances, capacitances, autotransformers, transformers, loads, and generators. The generators
are just supply sources operating at a much higher frequency than 50Hz to limit the size of the
components. The loads are represented by constant impedances. Meters are provided on the
panel board for measuring voltages, currents, and powers. The load flow solution is obtained
directly from measurements for any system simulated on the analyzer.
With the advent of the modern digital computer possessing large storage and high speed,
the mode of load flow studies have changed from analog to digital simulation. A large number
of algorithms are developed for digital power flow solutions. Some of the generally used
methods are described in this chapter. The methods basically distinguish between themselves
ww
in the rate of convergence, storage requirement and time of computation. The loads are generally
represented by constant power.
(i) w.E
In the network at each bus or node there are four variables viz.
Voltage magnitude
(ii)
(iii) asy
Voltage phase angle
Real power and
(iv)
En
Reactive power.
gi
Out of these four quantities two of them are specified at each bus and the remaining two
nee
are determined from the load flow solution. To supply the real and reactive power losses in
lines which will not be known till the end of the power flow solution, a generator bus, called
r
slack or swing bus is selected. At this bus, the gen~rator voltage magnitude and its phase angle
ing
are specified so that the unknown power losses are also assigned to this bus in addition to
balance of generation if any. Generally, at all other buses, voltage magnitude and real power
. net
are specified. At all load buses the real and the reactive load demands are specified. Table 2.1
illustrates the types of buses and the associated known and unknown variables.
ww
w.E Fig. 2.1 Three bus transmission system
asy
The line impedances joining buses 1,2 and 3 are denoted by z 12' Z 22 and z31 respectively.
The corresponding line admittances are Y12' Y22 and Y31
E
The total capacitive susceptances at the buses are represented by YIO' Y20 and Y30'
Applying Kirchoff's current law at each bus ngi
II = VI YIO + (VI
nee
- V 2) YI2 + (VI - V 3) YI3
l
VI]
V
V3
[YII
2 == Y2I
YJI
YI2
Y22
Y32
y"]n
Y23 '
Y33
~2
3
where
YII == YIO + YI2 + YI3
Y22 = Y20 + YI2 + Y23
Y 33 = Y30 + YI3 + Y23
Y 13 =Y 31 =-YI3
Y 23 = Y 32 = -Y23
are the mutual admittances forming the off-diagonal elements of the bus admittance
matrix. For an n-bus system, the elements of the bus admittance matrix can be written down
merely by inspection of the network as
diagonal terms
ww
n
YII = YiO + LY,k
k=1
k ..i
w.E
off and diagonal terms
asy Y. k =-Y.k
If the network elements have mutual admittance (impedance), the above formulae wi\l
E
not apply. For a systematic formation of the y-bus, linear graph theory with singular
transformations may be used.
System Model for Load Flow Studies ngi
nee
The variable and parameters associated with bus i and a neighboring bus k are represented in
the usual notation as follows :
S. = p. + j Q. = Vi [\
et
..... (2.2)
..... (2.3)
Using the indices G and L for generation and load,
p. = PG• - PLi = Re [Vi [.J ..... (2.4)
Q. = QG. - QL. = 1m [Vi 1. 1] ..... (2.5)
The bus current is given by
IBus = YBUS . VBUS ..... (2.6)
Hence, from eqn. (2.3) and (2.4) from an n-bus system
..... (2.8)
Further,
n
P, + jQ, = V, LYi~ V: ..... (2.9)
k=1
ww P, + jQ, = L
n
lV, Vk Y,klexpj(o, -Ok -e,k) ..... (2.10)
so thatw.E k=1
asLy P, ==
n
k=1
lV, Vk Yiklcos(o, -Ok -e,k) ..... (2.11 )
and
E n
Q, == L lV, ngi Y,k Isin (0, ..... (2.12)
nee
Vk -Ok -e,k)
k=1
rin
The power flow eqns. (2.11) and (2.12) are nonlinear and it is required to solve 2(n-1)
such equations involving 1V, I, 0" P, and Q, at each bus i for the load flow solution. Finally, the
powers at the slack bus may be computed from which the losses and all other line flows can g.n
be ascertained. V-matrix interactive methods are based on solution to power flow relations
using their current mismatch at a bus given by
n
et
L\ I, = I, - L Y,k V k ..... (2.13)
k=1
The convergence of the iterative methods depends on the diagonal dominance of the
bus admittance matrix. The self-admittances of the buses, are usually large, relative to the
mutual admittances and thus, usually convergence is obtained. Junctions of very high and low
series impedances and large capacitances obtained in cable circuits long, EHV lines, series and
shunt compensation are detrimental to convergence as these tend to weaken the diagonal
dominance in the V-matrix. The choice of slack bus can affect convergence considerably. In
difficult cases, it is possible to obtain convergence by removing the least diagonally dominant
row and column of Y. The salient features of the V-matrix iterative methods are that the
elements in the summation terms in eqn. (2.7) or (2.8) are on the average only three even for
well-developed power systems. The sparsity of the V-matrix and its symmetry reduces both
the storage requirement and the computation time for iteration (sec. 4). For a large, well
conditioned system of n-buses, the number of iterations required are of the order of n and total
computing time varies approximately as n2•
Instead of using eqn (2.6), one can select the impedance matrix and rewrite the
equation as
v = y- I 1= Z.I
ww
..... (2.15)
The Z-matrix method is not usually very sensitive to the choice of the slack bus. It can
w.E
easily be verified that the Z-matrix is not sparse. For problems that can be solved by both
Z-matrix and V-matrix methods, the former are rarely competitive with the V-matrix methods.
2.3
asy
Gauses - Seidel Iterative Method
In this method, voltages at all buses except at the slack bus are assumed. The voltage at the
En
slack bus is specified and remains fixed at that value. The (n-I) bus voltage relations.
[pl-jQI-~Ygv]
V=_I
Y ine V· ..... (2.16)
er
I L. Ik k
II I k=1
k",]
..... (2.17)
The method converges ~low1y because of the loose mathematical coupling between the
buses. The rate of convergence of the process can be increased by using acceleration factors
to the solution obtained after each iteration. A fixed acceleration factor a (I ::; a ::; 2) is
normally used for each voltage change,
The use of the acceleration factor amounts to a linear extrapolation of VI' For a given
system, it is quite often found that a near-optimal choice of a exists as suggested in literature
over -a range of operating conditions. Even though a complex value of a is suggested in
literature, it is more convenient to operate with real values given by
..... (2.19)
Alternatively, different acceleration factors may be used for real and imaginary parts of
the voltage.
Treatment of a PV - bus
ww
The method of handling a PV -bus requires rectangular coordinate representation for the voltages.
Lettering
asy
Where v; and v;' are the real and imaginary components of Vi the relationship.
En V '2
I
+v·"2
I
::; 1V I 12schedules ..... (2.21)
gi
must be satisfied, so that the reactive bus power required to establish the scheduled bus
nee
voltage can be computed. The estimates of voltage components, v;(m) and V;-(m) after
voltage is
1
r
m iterations must be adjusted to satisfy eqn. (2.21). The Phase angle of the estimated bus
ing
oem)
I
=tan-I
[
~"Cm)
'em)
Vi
. net ..... (2.22)
Assuming that the phase angles of the estimated and scheduled voltages are equal; .then
the adjusted estimates of V'(m) and V;'cm) are
ICm)
vi(new) -IVIIScheduiedcosuls:Cm)
- ..... (2.23)
and "(m)_I I .
vi(new) - VlscheduledsmBj
(m)
..... (2.24)
These values are used to calculate the reactive power Q\m) . Using these reactive powers
Q~m) and voltages Vi\~~W) a new estimate V lm+l) is calculated. The flowchart for computing
the solution of load flow using gauss-seidel method is given in Fig. 2.2.
While computing the reactive powers, the limits on the reactive source must be taken
into consideration. If the calculated value of the reactive power is beyond limits. Then its value
is fixed at the limit that is violated and it is no longer possible to hold the desired magnitude of
the bus voltage, the bus is treated as a PQ bus or load bus.
ww
w.E
a syE
Yes
1 Y
IJVcm) ngi
VCm ) =_1 [<PJ-.iQJ) ~Y
k =1 Ik
v(m+l)_
k
i
k=I+1
Y VIm)]
Ik k
nee
1
rin
g.n
et
Yes
Yes
m=m+ 1
Fig. 2.2 Flowchart for Gauss - Seidel iterative method for load flow solution using Y-Bus
ww
the higher order terms, the corrected set of equations are
w.E
w here ~ XI are the corrections to X. = (i = I, 2, ..... , n)
A set of linear equations, which define a tangent hyperplane to the function ~ (x) at the
a
given iteration point (x~O»)
syE
are obtained as
~Y= J~X .....(2.27)
where ~
ngi
Y is a column vector determined by
rin
function f given by the first order partial derivatives evaluated at x~O) The corrected solution is
obtained as
X(I) = x(O) + ~X g.n ..... (2.28)
et
I I I
The square Jacobian matrix J is defined by
Ofl
J lk = Ox ..... (2.29)
k
The above method of obtaining a converging solution for a set of nonlinear equations
can be used for solving the load flow problem. It may be mentioned that since the final voltage
solutions are not much different from the nominal values, Newton - Raphson method is
particularly suited to the load flow problem. The matrix J is highly sparse and is particularly
suited to the load flow application and sparsity - programmed ordered triangulation and back
substitution methods result in quick and efficient convergence to the load flow solution. This
method possesses quadratic convergence and thus converges very rapidly when the solution
point is close.
There are two methods of solution for the load flow using Newton - Raphson method.
The first method uses rectangular coordinates for the variables, while the second method uses
the polar coordinate formulation.
Where v I
+ jVI
= VI
and Y lk = Gik + j Bik
parts. w.E
Expanding the right side of the above equation and separating out the real and imaginary
En v~ -G lk v~)-V;'(Glk v~ +G lk v~)]
gi
QI = t[v;(G lk
k=1
nee
These are the two power relations at each bus and the linearized equations of the form
(2.27) are written as
..... (2.32)
oPn-1
av~_1
oPn-1 oPn-1
av~ av~-1
oPn-1
. net
~Pn-1
av'l av~_1 av~ av~_1 ..... (2.33)
=
00 1 00"-1 00 1 00"-1
~QI
av'; av " av'; av "
"-I "-I
oon-I 00"-1 oon-I OOn-1
~Qn-I av'l av n-I av'; av "0-1 ~v 0-1
Matrix equation (2.33) can be solved for the unknowns~v; and ~v;' (i = 1,2'00" n -1),
leaving the slack bus at the nth bus where the voltage is specified. Equation (2.33) may be
written compactly as
..... (2.34)
where H, N, M and L are the sub-matrices of the Jacobian. The elements of the Jacobian are
obtained by differentiating Eqns. (2.31) and (2.32). The off-diagonal and diagonal elements of
H matrix are given by
oP· "
-.-1 = G 1k V k + Blk V k ,i ~ k ..... (2.35)
Ov k
..... (2.36)
w.E oP·
-.-1 =Gikv
Ov k
"
k
.
-BikV ,k~i ..... (2.37)
E ngi
The off-diagonal and diagonal elements of sub-matrix M are obtained as,
rin
g.n ..... (2.40)
..... (2.42)
This property of symmetry of the elements reduces computer time and storage.
2 _ a~ll,12) , a~t1,12) .
But, 1t1Vj 1 - ,llV, + . t1v.
ww av, av,
w.E
This is the only modification required to be introduced in eqn. (2.40)
..... (2.44)
a
2.4.2 The Polar Coordinates Method.
syE
The equation for the complex power at node i in the polar form is given in eqn. (2.10) and the
ngi
real and reactive powers at bus i are indicated in eqn. (2.11) and (212). Reproducing them here
once again for convenience.
Pj = t nee
lv, Vk Yjklcos(o, - Ok - ejk ) ..... (2.11)
rin
k=1
n
L
and Q, =
k=1
IV j Vk Vjk Isin (OJ -Ok - e,k)
g.n ..... (2.12)
The Jocobian is then formulated in terms of IV I and 0 instead of Vj' and Vj" in this case.
Eqn. (2.27) then takes the form et
[:~l = [: ~l[II~~ Il ... (2.45)
The off-diagonal and diagonal elements of the sub-matrices H, N, M and L are determined
by differentiating eqns. (2.11) and (2.12) with respect to 0 and IVI as before. The off-diagonal
and diagonal elements of H matrix are
OP =IVj Vk V'klsin(o,-ok-e'k1j;~k
j
..... (2.46)
aO k
..... (2.47)
The Jocobian is [hen formulated in terms of IV I and 8 instead of V,' and V," in this case.
Eqn. (2.27) then takes the form
ww aP
-' = I
aD. K=I
n
lv, Vk Y,kI COS(D, -Dk -8,k1i;t: k ..... (2.47)
w.E
The off-diagonal and diagonal elements ofN matrix are
~=IV Yklsin(o
al V i ' "
-Ok -8 k)
,
..... (2.48)
a ap
al V, I
k
syE k=1
n
--'- = 21 Vi YII ICose'i + L IV. V,. ICos(8, - 8 k - O,k) ..... (2.49)
ngi k;t'
The off-diagonal and diagonal elements ofM matrix are
aQ, = -Iv, Vk
aO k
aQ n
nee
Y,k ICos (0, - Ok - e,k) ..... (2.50)
It is seen from the elements of the Jacobian in this case that the symmetry that existed
in the rectangular coordinates case is no longer present now. By selecting the variable as ~8
and ~ IVI / IVI instead equation (2.45) will be in the form
[ ~P] [H N] [~~'l
~Q
= M L IVI ..... (2.54 )
ww
w.E
asy ~p(m) = P (scheduled) _ P (m)
"
En
l\Q:m) '" Q, (scheduled) _ Q,(m)
,
gi nee
r Yes
ing
.
Calculate line flows
net
and power at slack
bus
[~ ~]=[: ~] [~ I~I]
Calculate the changes in variables
IV 1(111 + 1)= IV 1(111) + 6 V 1(111)
8(111+ 1)=8(111)+68 (111)
1
m=m+ I
Fig. 2.3 Flow chart for Newton - Raphson method (Polar coordinates) for load flow solution
a~vlY .
M
I
k =--
aO k
=0'1'*
'
k
ww
and
w.E Iv 1= L· =
Ik
afty. 12)
q
alvkl
I O·j '* k
asy a~VjlY
k ,
and
En d L j, = ~Vd IV,I =21 V
2
gin
Newtons method converges in 2 to 5 iterations from a flat start ( {V} = 1.0 p.u and 0 = 0)
eer
independent of system size. Previously stored solution can be used as starting values for rapid
convergence. Iteration time can be saved by using the same triangulated Jacobian matrix for
in
two or more iterations. For typical, large size systems, the computing time for one Newton -
Raphson iteration is roughly equivalent to seven Gauss - Seidel iterations.
g.n
The rectangular formulation is marginally faster than the polar version because there are
no time consuming trigonometric functions. However, it is observed that the rectangular
coordinates method is less reliable than the polar version.
ww
and x is a column vector of unknowns.
To solve eqn. (2.55) by the triangular decomposition method, matrix A is augmented by
b as shown
w.E
[~.: . asy ·:':··1
a l2 a ln
a 22 a 2n
anIEn a n2 ann bn
gi nee
The elements of the first row in the augmented matrix are divided by all as indicated by
the following step with superscripts denoting the stage of the computation.
J '-
lj -- ( - 1 alJ'J - 2, .........n
a (I)
all
r ing ..... {2.56)
bll)=(_IJb l
all
. net
..... (2.57)
In the next stage a21 is eliminated from the second row using the relations
a (I) (I) . 2
2 ) = a 2) -a 21 a l), J = ,......... ,n
..... (2.58)
b(l) -
2 -
b
2
-a 21 b(1)
I
..... (2.59)
2) =
a (2) (1m )a (1)
2j , J• = 3, ......... , n
a 22
b(2)
2
= (_1_) (I)
b(l)
2
..... (2.60)
a 22
ani a n2 a n3 ann bn
ww l
b(3)= b3 - a 31 b(l)
I ..... (2.62)
w.E a (2)
3)
b(2) -- b(l)
_
- a 3(I)) -a (I)
(I)b(2)' - 4
(2) • - 3
32 a 2) ,J - ,............. ,n ..... (2.63)
En a (3)
3
-
- ( I a (I)
a(2) 3j ,J' -
- 4, ....... ,n ..... (2.65)
gi
33
r ing
The elements to the left of the diagonal in the third row are eliminated and further the
diagonal element in the third row is made unity.
After n steps of computation for the nth order system of eqn. (2.55), the augmented
matrix will be obtained as
. net
a(l)
12
o I
o o
By back substitution, the solution is obtained as
x = ben) ..... (2.67)
n n
..... (2.69)
For matrix inversion of an nth order matrix, the number of arithmetical operations required
ww
Consider the network system having five nodes as shown in Fig. 2.4
w.E 3
asy
En
gi nee
4
rin
The y-bus matrix of the network will have entries as follows
g.n
2
x
x
2 3 4
x
x
x x
0 0 =y
et
..... (2.70)
3 x 0 x 0
4 x 0 0 x
2 0 x x =y ..... (2.71)
300 1 x
4 000
By ordering the nodes as in Fig. 2.5 the bus admittance matrix will be of the form
2 3 4
x 0 0 x
2 0 x 0 x =Y ..... (2.72)
3 0 0 x x
4 x x x x
ww 3
w.E @
asy 4
En
Fig. 2.5 Renumbered five bus system
gi
As a result of triangular decomposition, the V-matrix will be reduced to
234
nee
o
2 0
0 x
o x =Y rin ..... (2.73)
300 x
g.n
400 0
et
Thus, comparing the matrices in eqn. (2.71) and (2.73) the non-zero off diagonal entries
are reduced from 6 to 3 by suitably numbering the nodes.
Tinney and Walker have suggested three methods for optimal ordering.
1. Number the rows according to the number of non-zero, off-diagonal elements before
elimination. Thus, rows with less number of off diagonal elements are numbered
first and the rows with large number last.
2. Number the rows so that at each step of elimination the next row to be eliminated is
the one having fewest non-zero terms. This method required simulation of the
elimination process to take into account the changes in the non-zero connections
affected at each step.
3. Number the rows so that at each step of elimination, the next row to be eliminated is
the one that will introduce fewest new non-zero elements. This requires simulation
of every feasible alternative at each step.
Scheme I. is simple and fast. However, for power flow solutions, scheme 2. has proved to be
advantageous even with its additional computing time. If the number of iterations is large,
scheme 3. may prove to be advantageous.
ww ~P] [H
[ ~Q - M
NI ~o ]
L IVI/~IVI
w.E
by neglecting Nand M sub matrices as a first step, decoupling can be obtained so that
I ~Q I = I L I . I ~ I VI ! I V I
..... (2.74)
..... (2.75)
En
The decoupled method converges as reliability as the original Newton method from
gi
which it is derived. However, for very high accuracy the method requires more iterations
nee
because overall quadratic convergence is lost. The decoupled Newton method saves by a
factor of four on the storage for the J - matrix and its tri-angulation. But, the overall saving is
ing
2.9 Fast Decoupled Methods
. net
For security monitoring and outage-contingency evaluation studies, fast load flow solutions
are required. A method developed for such an application is described in this section.
The elements of the sub-matrices Hand L (eqn. (2.54» are given by
H'k = I (VI Vk Ylk ) I sin (01 - Ok - elk)
= I (VI Vk Ylk ) I sin 0lk Cos elk - cos 0lk Cos elk)
= I VI Vk I [G lk sin 0lk - B Ik cos ~\d
where 01 - Ok = 0lk
Hkk = - 2:IVI Vk YI~ Isin(o, Ok elk)
= + I VI 12 1YII I sin elk -I Vi 121 Vlk I sin elk
- 2:IVI Vk Yiklsin(Oi -Ok -elk)
Assuming that
Cos O,k == I
Sin O,k == 0
0, ~ Bi , IV?I
~ B,k
and
w.E Hik = -I V, Vk I B,k
or
IVI
. net
pi B'[~o]
III = ..... (2.78)
IVI
Both ~.] and [B"] are real and spars e and need be triangularised only once, at the
beginning of the study since they contain network admittances only.
The method converges very reliably in two to five iterations with fairly good accuracy
even for large systems. A good, approximate solution is obtained after the pI or 2nd iteration.
The speed per iteration is roughly five times that of the original Newton method.
w.E
2. A bus may be added to any existing bus in the system other than the reference bus
through a new line, and
3. A line may be added joining two existing buses in the system forming a loop.
asy
The above three modes are illustrated in Fig. 2.6
S,,,,~_i
E ngi B
k
0-+-<>----0 New
System lime bus
i
lime
~
_ _O New System rk
k bus
nee
(a)
Line added to
(b)
rin
Line added to any bus other
(c)
Line added joining two
reference bus than reference line
g.n existing buses
2.10.2
Fig. 2.6 Building of Z - Bus
J
System :-+-----<1 ~ l
Fig. 2.7 Addition of the line to reference line
System :>-+------<I J~ l
ww Fig. 2.8 Addition of a radial line and new bus
w.E
Therefore,
asy
therefore,
E Zmk = Zml' m
ngi
-:t:. k
The dimension of the existing Z - Bus matrix is increased by one. The off diagonal
..... (2.82)
nee
elements of the new row and column are the same as the elements of the row and column of
bus i of the existing system.
'-------' r
(a) (b)
and
ww
w.E
It can be proved easily that
En
using eqn. (2.85) all the additional elements introduced by the loop can be eliminated.
The method is illustrated in example 2.3
gi
2.10.5 Gauss - Seidel Method Using Z-bus for Load Flow Solution
nee
An initial bus voltage vector is assumed as in the case of Y - bus method. Using these
voltages, the bus currents are calculated using eqn. (2.6) or (2.7).
rin
P .Q
1= I-J I_ y v
y' I I
g.n ..... (2.86)
A new bus voltage estimate is obtained for an n-bus system from the relation.
Y bus = Zbus Ibus + YR ..... (2.87)
..... (2.88)
Then
i = 1,2, ........ , n
S = slack bus
ww Iv,l
Pi = P,(N) [ IVi(N) I]
3
w.E Iv,l
b ..... (2.89)
En
Differentiating egn. (2.89) with respect to V
oP,
gi [ Iv,l
0IV, I = P,(N) ·a· IV'(N)I
](8-1)
nee
1 OP,(N) [ Iv,l
IV'(N)I + o!V,! IV'(N)I
]8
..... (2.90)
..... (2.92)
Similarly,
(b-I) [J(b)
OQ , _ . . b.1& _1_+ OQ,(N) 1&
oV - Q'(N)
I
[ IV I] IV I oV Iv I ..... (2.93)
I(N) ',(N) I ,(N)
ww
w.E ..... (2.95)
asy
En
Inclusion of static load model into load flow equations required the use of eqn. (2.92)
and (2.95) in place of eqn. (2.49) and (2.53). In other words, the diagonal elements of the sub
nee
2.12 Comparision of Various Methods for Power Flow Solution
r ing
The requirements of a good power flow method are - high speed, low storage, and reliability
for ill-conditioned problems. No single method meets all these requirements. It may be mentioned
. net
that for regular load flow studies NR-method in polar coordinates and for special applications
fast decoupled load flow solution methods have proned to be most useful than other methods.
NR-method is versatile, reliable and accurate. Fast decoupled load flow method is fast and
needs the least storage.
Convergence of iterative methods depends upon the dominance of the diagonal elettlents
of the bus admittance matrix. •
ww 4. The method is best suited for load flow solution to large size systems.
5. Oecoupled and fast decoupled power flow solution can be obtained from Newton Raphsan
w.E
Polar Coordinates method. Hence, it also can serve as a base for security and
contingency studies.
asy
Disadvantages of Newton-Raphsan Method,'
E
I. The memory needed is quite large for large size systems.
ngi
2. Calculations per iteration are also much larger than Gauss-Seidel method.
3. Since, it is a gradient method, the method is quite involved and hence, programming is
nee
also comparatively difficult and complicated.
E 2.1 A three bus power system is shown in Fig. E2.1. The system parameters are given in
rin
Table E2.1 and the load and generation data in Table E2.2. The voltage at bus 2 is
g.n
maintained at I.03p.u. The maximum and minimum reactive power limits of the
generation at bus 2 are 35 and 0 Mvar respectively. Taking bus 1 as slack bus obtain the
load flow solution using
(a)
(b)
Gauss - Seidel iterative method using YBus
Newton - Raphson polar coordinates method using YBus
et
Bus Code i-k Impedance (p.u.) Zjk Line charging Admittance (p.u) Yj
2-3 0.06+jO.018 0
ww I 1.05+jO.0
MW
-
Mvar
-
MW
0
Mvar
0
w.E 2
3
1.03 +jO.O
--
20
0
-
0
50
ro
20
25
Solution:
asy
En
The line admittance are obtained as
gi
Y12 == 1.25 - j3.75
Y23 == 1.667 - j5.00
YI3 == 5.00 - j15.00 nee
rin
The bus admittance matrix is formed using the procedure indicated in section 2.1 as
1
=-----
(2.9167 - j8.75)
An acceleration factor of 1.4 is used for both real and imaginary parts.
The accelerated voltages is obtained using
= 1.01583L - 2.56648°
ww
The voltage at bus 3 is given by
2 - Y
w.E
V(I) - _1_[P3 - jQ3 - y V - Y V(I)]
33
V(O)·
3
31 I 32 2
a
6.6667 - j20 syE
ngi
nee
=1.02093 - jO.0351381
rin
The accelerated value of VP) obtained using
g.n
v~ = 1.0 + 1.4(1.02093 - 1.0) = 1.029302
v; =0 + 1.4(-0.0351384 - 0) =-0.0491933
et
vjl) = 1.029302 - jO.049933
= 1.03048L - 2.73624 0
ww The magnitudes of all the voltage changes are greater than 0.001.
w.E
Iteration 2 : The reactive power Q2 at bus 2 is calculated as before to give
L_" 1<1)
8(1) =tan-I~=tan-I -0.0454874 =-2.566480
[ ]
E
V(2) -
3 -
1 [
ngi 1
- 6.6 + jO.25
6.6667 - j20 1.029302 + jO.0491933
nee
- (-5 + jI5)(1.05 + jO.O)
rin
- (-1.6667 + j5.0)· (1.023216 - jO.0611)]
= 1.0226 - jO.0368715
(0.0491933) =-0.03194278
The procedure is repeated till convergence is obtained at the end of the sixth iteration.
The results are tabulated in Table E2.1 (a)
w.E
5 1.05 +jO 1.027726 - jO.0539141 1.0281748 - jO.0363943
6 1.05 + jO 1.029892 - jO.05062 1.020301- jO.0338074
asy
7 1.05 + jO 1.028478 - jO.0510 117 1.02412 - jO.034802
SI2 vt(vtE
Line flow from bus 1 to bus 2
=
ngi
- V;)vt2 = 0.228975 + jO.017396
= (0.912981 + jO.242396)
et
Table E2.1(b) Line Flows
Note that
LY II = -71.6°
w.E
The initial bus voltages are
VI = 1.05 LOo
asy
via) = 1.03LOO
v~O)
E =1.0LOO
ngi
The real and reactive powers at bus 2 are calculated as follows:
P2 = IV 2VIY21 Icos(&~O) -
nee
&1 - 9 21 )+Ivi y 22 lcos(- 9 22 )+
IV2V3Y23Isin(&~0) -&~O) -9 23 )
= (1.03) (1.05) (3.95285) sin (-108°.4) + (1.03)2 (9.22331) sin (71.6°)
+ (1.03) (1.0) (5.27046) sin (108.4°)
= 0.07725
IVjO)2 Y33ICOS(-833)
"" (1.0) (1.05) (15.8114) cos (-108.4°) +
(1.0) (1.03) (5.27046) cos (-108.4°)
+ (1.0)2 (21.0819) cos (71.6°)
=-0.3
w.E "'" (1.0) 1.05 (15.8114) sin (-108.4°) + (1.0) (1.03) (5.27046)
sin (-108.4°)
asy
+ (1.0)2 (21.0891) sin (71.6°)
=-0.9
E ngi
The difference between scheduled and calculated powers are
3
= (\.03) (5.27046) cos (108.4°)
= - \.7166724
asy = 20.9
E ngi
nee
Iv 2 Y321 cos(&~O) - 8~0) - 8 32 )
=
rin
2(1.0) (21.0819) cos (71.6°) + (1.05) (15.8114) cos (-108.4°) +
=
(1.03) (5.27046) cos (-108.4°)
6.366604 g. net
00
00 -- -IV(O)V
3
3 1
y Icos(8(O) - &(0) - 8 )
32 3 2 32
2
- I
00= V3(0) VI Y32 cosu3
3 (s::(O) I -U
s:: 8)
I - 31 +
00 3
IV(O)V
3 y32 Icos(o(O)2 - 0(0)
2 3 - e32 )
= (1.0) (1.05) (15.8114) cos (-108.4°) - 1.7166724
= - 6.9667
w.E [
0.65 1.71667 - 6.9967
asy
Following the method of triangulation and back substations
j
[E -0,35386] [
-0.3
- 0.035386
= -5.15
I - 0.55944 - 0.18648][ .1<>2
ngi
20.9
+ ] .71667 - 6.9667
6.36660
] 9.]
.1<>3
.1!V3!
-0.55944 nee j
[
- 0.35386 J [1
- 0.482237 = 0 18.02 5.40623
rin
- 0.18648J[ .1<>2
.1<>3
+0.7]0746
g.
0 -6.006326 ]9.420]2 .1!V3!
= - 0.049874 rad
=- 2.8575°
asy
Generation of reactive power at bus 2
== 0.2 + 0.043853 == 0.243856 p.u. Mvar
En
== 24.3856 Mvar
gi
This is within the specified limits.
The real and reactive powers at bus 3 are computed as
nee
pjll = (1.025917)(1.05)(l5.8117)cos[( -1.09788) - 0 -108.4°)]
r ing
+ (l.025917)(l.03)(5.27046)cos[(-1.0988) - (-2.8575) -108.4]
+ (1.025917)2 (2 1.08 I 9)cos(71.6° )
=-0.60407
Even though the first two differences are within the limits the last one, Q~I) is greater
than the specified limit 0.0 I. The next iteration is carried out in a similar manner. At the end of
the second iteration even dQ 3 also is found to be within the specified tolerance. The results are
tabulated in table E2.1.2(a) and E2.1.2(b)
w.E Line
Table E2.1.2(b) Line Flows
P Power Flow Q
En2-1
1-3
- 0.22332
0.68396
-0.0049313
0.224
gi
3-1
2-3
- 0.674565
-0.074126
nee
-0.0195845
0.0554
3-2 0.07461
r ing
E2.2 Obtain the load flow solution to the system given in example E2.1 using Z-8us. Use
- 0.054
Z = (2)
BUS (2) ! 0.05 + jO.24!
(ii) Add element 1-3. This is also addition of a new bus to the reference bus
(2) (3)
(2) 0.08 + jO.24 0.0 + jO.O
ZBUS = (3) 0.0 + jO.O 0.02 + jO.06
(iii) Add element 2-3. This is the addition of a link between two existing buses 2
and 3.
Z2_loop =; ZIOop-2 =; Z22 - Z23 =; 0.08+jO.24
Z3-IOOp =; Zloop-3 =; Z32 - Z33 =; -(0.02+jO.06)
Z,oop-Ioop =; Z22 + Z33 - 2 Z23 + Z23, 23
= (0.08+jO.24 )+(0.02+jO.06)(0.06 + jO.18)
=; 0.16 +j0.48
(2) (3)
ww ZBUS =
(2)
(3)
0.08 + jO.024
0.0 + jO.O
0+ jO
0.02 + jO.06
0.08 + jO.24
- (0.02 + jO.06)
asy
The loop is now eliminated
En ,
Z 22 = Z 22
Z2-loop Zloop-2
- ----'---'--
Zloop-loop
0.1265L71.565° I 0.031623L71.565°
[ 0.031623L71.565° 0.05534L71.565°
1
1(0) ::::: -0.3 + jO.O ::::: -0.29126 _ '0.0 = 0.291 26LI 80°
ww 2 1.03 _ jO.O J
gi (0.031623L71.565° )(0.65LI57.3So
nee
1.02485 - jO.05045
1.02609L-2.8182
The new bus current I~O) is now calculated. rin
g.n
et
::::: 1.02609L - 2.8182 x ( 1.03 _ 1)::::: 0.0309084L _ 74.38320
0.1265L71.565° 1.02609
(0.05534L71.565° )(0.65LI57.38°)
w.E
VI = 1.05 L 0°
Vii) = 1.02609L: - 2.8182°
syE
The differences in voltages are
ngi
11 V~I) = (1.02485 -10.05045) - (1.03 + jO.O)
= -0.00515 - jO.05045
11 vjl) = (1.02389 - jO.036077) - (1.0 + jO.O)
nee
= (0.02389 - jO.036077)
rin
Both the real and imaginary parts are greater than the specified limit 0.00 I.
= 0.01923L -74.38°
= 0.0186487
= 0.295763LI86.393 °
vj2) = 1.05LOO + (0.31623L71.565° (0.295763LI86.4 ° +
0.05534L71.565° )(0.634437 LI55.360)
w.E
3 1.02466LI.9459 0
asy
f1 vjl) = (1.024 - jO.034793) - (1.02389 - jO.036077) = 0.00011 + jO.00128
En
As the accuracy is still not enough, another iteration is required.
Iteration 3 :
gi nee
V~3) = 1.05LOo + (0.1265L71.565° )(0.295763LI86.4 0 ) +
r
(0.031623L71.565° )(0.63487 L155.434 0)
= 1.0285187 - jO.051262 ing
= 1.0298L - 2.853° . net
1(2) = 1.0298L-2.853° [~-I]=0.00158IL74.4180
2 0.1265L71.565 0 1.0298
!lQ~2) = 0.00154456
Q~3) = 0.0486487 + 0.001544 = 0.0502
v1 3
) = 1.05LOO + (O.031623L71.5650) + (0.29537 L186.6470) +
=0.0021787 - 0.000787
!:l V~2) = (1.024152 - jO.034817) - (1.024 - jO.034793)
= 0.000152 - jO.00002
Iteration 4 :
ww vi 4
) = 1.02996L - 2.852°
~1~3) = 0.0003159L - 74.4170
4 5
ww
Scheduled generation and bus voltages :
Bus Code P
w.E Assumed bus voltage
MWp.u.
Generation
Mvarp.u MWp.u.
Load
Mvarp.u
I
asy 1.05 +jO.O
(specified)
... ... _.. ...
2
En ... 1.2 0.05 ... ...
3
4
5
gi ...
...
...
1.2
...
...
0.05
nee
...
...
...
1.4
0.8
...
0.05
0.03
6 ... ...
r
-..
ing
0.7 0.02
Taking bus - I as slack bus and using an accelerating factor of 1.4, perform load flow
by Gauss - Seidel method. Take precision index as 0.000 I.
Solution:
. net
The bus admittance matrix is obtained as :
Bus Code Admittance (p.u.)
P-Q Real Imaginary
I-I 14.516310 -32.57515
1-4 -5.486446 8.13342
1-5 -9.029870 24.44174
2-2 7.329113 -28.24106
2-3 -1.011091 5.529494
2-5 -5.035970 16.301400
2-6 -1.282051 6.410257
Contd. ..••
ww 5-1
5-2
-9.029870
-5035970
24.441740
16.301400
w.E 5-4
5-5
-4.529948
18.595790
14.593900
-55.337050
asy
6-2 -1.282051 6.410257
6-6
En 1.282051 -6.410254
gi
All the bus voltages, y(O), are assumed to be I + jO except the specified voltage at bus
nee
I which is kept fixed at 1.05 + jO. The voltage equations for the fist Gause-Seidel iteration are:
v 2(I) -
-
_1_ [ P2 -
Y
2
V
2
.iQ 2
(0)'
_ Y
21
v3 (0) _ Y
r2"
V (0) _ Y
26
V
ing
(0) ]
6
y(l) =
3
_1_[P3
y
33
-jQ3 - y
y(O)*
.1
32
y(I)]
2 . net
y(l) =
4
_1_[P4 - jQ4 - Y41 Y- y 45 y(O)]
y y(O)' 5 I
44 4
y(l) -
5 - y
_1_[P5y(O)'
- jQ5 - Y y - Y y(l) - y y(l)]
51 I 51 2 54 4
55 5
y(l) =
6
_1_[P6 - jQ6 - y
y y(O)' 62
y(l)]
2
66 6
=( 1.011091
ww
V(I) 1 '5.52424)X[I.2- jO.05]
3 J l-jO
- (-1.011091 + j5.529404) x (1.016786 + jO.0557924)
asy
v(1) =( 1 _ '22.72732) x [-1.4 + jO.005]
4
E 10.01639 J
ngi
l-jO
- (-5.486446 + j8.133342) x (1.05 + jO.)
- (-4.529948 + jI4.5939)(1 + jO)
= 0.992808 - jO.0658069
nee
=( 18.59579 rin
V(I)
5
1 _ '55.33705}X[-0.8+ jO.03]
J 1- jO
- (-9.02987 + j24.44174) x (1.05 + jO)
g. net
- (-5.03597 + jI6.3014)(1.016786 + jO.0557929)
- (-4.529948 + jI4.5939)(0.992808 - jO.0658069)
= 1.028669 - jO.O 1879179
V(I)
6
=( 1.282051
1 _ '6.410257) x [-0.7 + jO.02]
J 1- jO
- (-1.282051 - j6.41 0257) x (1.016786 + jO.0557924)
= 0.989904 - jO.0669962
ww
Table E2.3(a)
w.E
0 1+ jO.O I + jO.O 1+ jO.O 1+ jO.O 1+ jO.O
I 1.016789 + jO.0557924 1.089511 + jO.3885233 0.992808 - jO.0658069 1.02669 - jO.O 1879179 0.989901 - jO.0669962
3
1.05306 + jO. 1018735
I 043568 + jO.089733
asy
1.014855 + jO.2323309
1.054321 + jO.3276035
1.013552 - jO.0577213
1.021136 - jO.0352727
1.042189 + jO.O 177322
1.034181 + jO.00258192
1.041933 + jO.0192121
1.014571-jO.02625271
E
4 1.047155 + jO.101896 1.02297 + jO.02763564 1.012207 - jO.0500558 1.035391 + jO.00526437 1.02209 + jO.00643566
6
1.040005 + jO.093791
1.04212 + jO.097843I
1.03515 + jO.3050814
1.027151 +':0.2901358
ngi
1.61576 -jO.04258692
1.013044 - jO.04646546
0.033319 + jO.003697056 1.014416 - jO.01319787
nee
7 I 040509 + jO.0963405 1.031063 + jO.2994083 1014418-jO.0453101 1.033845 + jO.00430454 1.016182 - jO.00770669
8 1.041414 + jO.097518 1.028816 + jO.294465 1.013687 - jO.04561 0 I 1.033845 + jO.004558826 1.017353 -jO 0048398
rin
9 1040914+ jO.097002 1.030042 + jO.2973287 1-014148 - jO.04487629 1.033711 + jO.004413647 1.016743 - jO.0060342
II
12
1.041036 + jO.097164 1.029739 + jO.296598 1.01403 - jO.04498312
1.033761 + jO.00447096
g.n
1.016877 - jO.00558081
\.016997 - jO.00524855
13
14
1.041075 + jO.0971451
1.041104 + jO.0971777
1.029642 + jO.2963715 1019331-jO.04501488
t
Downloaded From : www.EasyEngineering.net
Downloaded From : www.EasyEngineering.net
Table E2.3(b)
ww 6 1.016981 -3.001928
w.E
E2.4 For the given sample find load flow solution using N-R polar coordinates, decoupled
method and fast decoupled method.
asy
En 5
gi nee
r ing
3 4 . net
Bus Code Line impedance Zpq Line charging
ww
1 11.724 - j24.27
~
- \0 + j20
3
0+ jO
4
0+ jO
5
-1.724 + j4.31
2
3
-10+ j20
0+ jO
w.E10.962- j24.768 - 0.962 + j4.808
- 0.962 + j4.808 6.783 - j21.944'-
0+ jO
- 5 + j15
0+ jO
- 0.822 + j2.192
4 0+ jO
asy 0+ jO - 5+ j15 15 - j34.98 -10+ j20
En
5 -1.724 + j4.31 0+ jO - 0.82 + j2.192 - \0 + j20 12.546 - j26.447
ww dQ[5] = -0.002888
The New voltage vector after iteration 2 is :
w.E
Bus no IE: 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.984357 F :- 0.008219
asy
Bus no 3 E : 0.880951 F :- 0.142953
En
Bus no 4 E : 0.868709 F :- 0.154322
Bus no 5 E : 0.874651 F :- 0.143439
dp[2] = 0.000005
gi
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no : 3 is
nee
dp[3] = -0.000001
rin
dp[4] = -0.000013
dp[5] = -0.000001 g.n
dQ[2] = -0.000002
dQ[3] = -0.000005
et
dQ[4] = -0.000003
dQ[5] = -0.000007
The final load flow solution (for allowable error.OOOI) :
bus no I Slack P = 1.089093 Q = 0.556063 E = 1.000000 F = 0.000000
bus no 2 pq P = 0.349995 Q = 0.150002 E = 0.984357 F = -0.008219
bus no 3 pq P = -0.449999 Q = -0.199995 E = 0.880951 F = -0.1429531
bus no 4 pq P = -0.399987 Q = -0.150003 E = 0.868709 F = -0.154322
bus no 5 pq P = -0.50000 I Q = -0.249993 E = 0.874651 F = -0.143439
ww
dQ[4] = -0.130000
w.E
dQ[5] = -0.195000
The new voltage vector after iteration 0 :
asy
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E ; 0.997385 F ;- 0.014700
E
Bus no 3 E: 0.947017 F:- 0.148655
Bus no 4 E: 0.941403 F:- 0.161282 ngi
Bus no 5 E : 0.943803 F :- 0.150753
nee
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no: I is
dp [2] = 0.005323 rin
dp[3] = -0.008207
dp[4] = -0.004139
g. net
dp[5] = -0.019702
dQ[2] = -0.067713
dQ[3] = -0.112987
dQ[4] = -0.159696
dQ[5] = -0.210557
The new voltage vector after iteration 1 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.982082 F :- 0.013556
Bus no 3 E : 0.882750 F ;- 0.143760
Bus no 4 E : 0.870666 F :- 0.154900
Bus no 5 E : 0.876161 F :- 0.143484
ww dQ[5] = 0.007721
.Ea
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.981985 F:- 0.007091
syE
Bus no 3 E : 0.880269 F :- 0.142767
Bus no 4 E: 0.868132 F:- 0.154172
ngi
Bus no 5 E : 0.874339 F :- 0.143109
nee
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no:3 is
dp[2] == 0.000138
dp[3] = 0.001304
dp[4] = 0.004522
r ing
dp[5] = -0.006315
dQ[2] = 0.066286
. net
dQ[3] = 0.006182-
dQ[4] = -0.001652
dQ[5] == -0.002233
The new voltage vector after iteration 3 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.984866 F :- 0.007075
Bus no 3 E : 0.881111 F :- 0.142710
Bus no 4 E : 0.868848 F :- 0.154159
Bus no 5 E : 0.874862 F :- 0.143429
ww dQ[5] = -0.003361
The new voltage vector after iteration 4 :
w.E
Bus no 1 E: 1.000000 F : 0.000000
asy
Bus no 2 E : 0.984866 F :- 0.008460
Bus no 3 E: 0.881121 F:- 0.142985
E
Bus no 4 E : 0.868849 F :- 0.1546330
Bus no 5 E: 0.874717 F:- 0.143484
ngi
nee
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no:5 is
dp[2] = 0.006789
dp[3] = -0.000528
rin
dp[4] = -0.000217
dp[5] -0.0000561 g.n
et
=
dQ[2] = -0.000059
dQ[3] = -0.000059
dQI4] = -0.000635
dQ[S] = -0.000721
The new voltage vector after iteration 5 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.984246 F :- 0.008169
Bus no 3 E : 0.880907 F :- 0.142947
Bus no 4 E : 0.868671 F :- 0.154323
Bus no 5 E : 0.874633 F :- 0.143431
ww dQ[5] = -0.000267
w.E
The new voltage vector after iteration 6 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
asy
Bus no 2 E : 0.984379 F :- 0.008165
Bus no 3 E : 0.886954 F :- 0.142941
En
Bus no 4 E : 0.868710 F :- 0.154314
gi
Bus no 5 E : 0.874655 F :- 0.143441
nee
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no:7 is
r
dp[2] = - 0.001466
dp[3] = 0.000106
ing
dp[4] = -0.000073
dp[5] = 0.000156
dQ[2] = 0.000033
. net
dQ[3] = 0.000005
dQ[4] = 0.000152
dQ[5] = -0.000166
The new voltage vector after iteration 7 :
Bus no 1 E: 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.954381 F :- 0.008230
Bus no 3 E : 0.880958 F :- 0.142957
Bus no 4 E : 0.868714 F :- 0.154325
Bus no 5 E : 0.874651 F :- 0.143442
ww dQ[5] = --0.000074
The new vc;>ltage vector after iteration 8 :
w.E
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus, no 2 E : 0.984352 F :- 0.008231
a syE
Bus no 3 E : 0.880947 F :- 0.142958
Bus no 4 E : 0.868706 F :- 0.154327
ngi
Bus no 5 E : 0.874647 F :- 0.143440
nee
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no:9 is
dp[2] = 0.000318
dp[3] = --0.000022
rin
dp[4] = 0.000023
dp[ 5] = --0.000041 g.n
dQ[2] = --0.000012
dQ[3] = --0.000000
et
dQ[4] = 0.000036
dQ[5] = --0.000038
The new voltage vector after iteration 9 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.984352 F :- 0.008217
Bus no 3 E : 0.880946 F :- 0.142954
Bus no 4 E : 0.868705 F :- 0.154324
Bus no 5 E : 0.874648 F :- 0.143440
ww dQ[5] = -0.000020
The new voltage vector after iteration 10 :
w.E
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.984658 F :- 0.008216
a
Bus no 3 E : 0.880949 F :- 0.142954
syE
Bus no 4 E : 0.868707 F :- 0.154324
ngi
Bus no 5 E : 0.874648 F :- 0.143440
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no: 11 is
dp[2] = -0.000069
dp[3] = 0.000005 nee
dp[4] = -0.000006
rin
dp[5] = 0.000011
dQ[2]
,
= 0.000004 g.n
dQ[3].= -0.000000
dQ[4] = 0.000008
et
dQ[5] = -0.000009
The final load flow solution after 11 iterations
(for allowable arror.OOO 1)
The final load flow solution (for allowable error.OOOl) :
Bus no 1 Slack P = 1.089043 Q = 0.556088 E = 1.000000 F = 0.000000
Bus no 2 pq P = 0.350069 Q = 0.150002 E = 0.984658 F = -0.008216
Bus no 3 pq P = -0.450005 Q = -0.199995 E = 0.880949 F = -0.142954
Bus no 4 pq P = -0.399994 Q = -0.150003 E = 0.868707 F = -0.154324
Bus no 5 pq P = -0.500011 Q = -0.249991 E ::;0.874648 F = -0.143440
w.E
The new voltage vector after iteration 0 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
asy
Bus no 2 E : 0.997563 F :- 0.015222
Bus no 3 E: 0.947912 F:- 0.151220
En
Bus no 4 E: 0.942331 F:- 0.163946
gi
Bus no 5 E : 0.944696F :- 0.153327
nee
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no: I is
dp[2] = 0.004466
dp[3] = ....{).00075I
dp[4] = 0.007299
r ing
dp[5]
dQ[2]
= ....{).012407
= 0.072548
. net
dQ[3] = ....{).118299
dQ[4] = 0.162227
dQ[5] = ....{).218309
The new voltage vector after iteration 1 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.981909 F :- 0.013636
Bus no 3 E : 0.882397 F :- 0.143602
Bus no 4 E : 0.869896 F :- 0.154684
Bus no 5 E : 0.875752 F :- 0.143312
ww dQ[5] = -0.002874
The new voltage vector after iteration 2 :
w.E
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.982004 F :- 0.007026
asy
Bus no 3 E : 0.880515 F :- 0.142597
En
Bus no 4 E : 0.868400 F :- 0.153884
gi
Bus no 5 E : 0.874588 F :- 0.143038
nee
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no: 3 is
dp[2] = -0.000850
dp[3] = -0.002093
dp[4] = 0.000155
r ing
dp[5] = -0.003219
dQ[2] = 0.067612
. net
dQ[3] = -0.007004
dQ[4] = -0.003236
dQ[5] = -0.004296
The new voltage vector after iteration 3 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.984926 F :- 0.007086
Bus no 3 E : 0.881246 F :- 0.142740
Bus no 4 E: 0.869014 F :;-,0.154193
Bus no 5 E : 0.874928 F :- 0.143458
wwdQ[4] = -0.000232
dQ[5] = -0.001698
w.E
The new voltage vector after iteration 4 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
asy
Bus no 2 E : 0.984862 F :- 0.008488
Bus no 3 E: 0.881119 F:- 0.143053
En
Bus no 4 E : 0.868847 F :- 0.154405
Bus no 5 E: 0.874717 F:- 0.143501
gi nee
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no: 5 is
dp[2] = 0.000433
dp[3] = 0.000006 r ing
dp[4] = -0.000288
dp[5] = 0.000450 . net
dQ[2] = -0.014315
dQ[3] = -0.000936
dQ[4] = -0.000909
dQ[5] = -0.001265
The new voltage vector after iteration 6 :
~no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
/Bus no 2 E : 0.984230 F :- 0.008463
Bus no 3 E : 0.881246 F :- 0.143008
Bus no 4 E : 0.869014 F :- 0.154357
Bus no 5 E : 0.874607 F :- 0.143433
dQ[3] = 0.000039
dQ[4] = -{).000155
ww dQ[5] = 0.000247
w.E
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no: 7 is
dp[2] = -{).000144
asy
dp[3] = -{).000050
_ dp[4] = 0.000080
dQ[2] = 0.003107
E
dp[5] = -{).000068
ngi
dQ[3] = -{).000162
dQ[4] = -0.000255 nee
dQ[5] = -{).000375
rin
The new voltage vector after iteration 7 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000 g.n
Bus no 2 E : 0.984386 F :- 0.008166
Bus no 3 E : 0.880963 F :- 0.142943
et
-. Bus no 4 E : 0.868718 F :- 0.154316
Bus no 5 E : 0.874656F :- 0.143442
-
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no: 8 is
dp[2] = -{).001523
dp[3] = -{).OOO 105
dp[4] =-{).000115
dp[5] = -{).000215
dQ[2] = 0.000098
dQ[3] = -{).000024
dQ[4] = -{).000037
dQ[5] = -{).000038
ww dp[3] = 0.000015
wdp[ 4] = -0.000017
dp[5] = 0.000008
dQ[2] = .Ea
0.000679
dQ[3] = 0.000031
syE
dQ[ 4] = -0.000072
dQ[5] = -0.000105 ngi
The new voltage vector after iteration 9 :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
nee
Bus no 2 E : 0.984350 F :- 0.008230 r ing
Bus no 3 E : 0,880945 F :- 0.142958
Bus no 4 E : 0.868704 F :- 0.154326
Bus no 5 E : 0.874646 F :- 0.143440
. net
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no: lOis
dp[2] = 0.000334
dp[3] = -0.000022
dp[4] = 0.000033
dp[5] = -0.000056
dQ[2] = 0.000028
dQ[3] = 0.000007
dQ[4] = -0.000007
dQ[5] = 0.000005
ww
dp[3] = -0.000004
w.E
dp[4]
dp[5]
=
=
0.000003
-0.000000
dQ[3]asy
dQ[2] = 0.000149
= -0.000007
dQ[4] = 0.000020
En
dQ[5] = -0.000027,
gin
eer
The new voltage vector after iteration II :
Bus no 1 E : 1.000000 F : 0.000000
Bus no 2 E : 0.984358 F :- 0.008216
Bus no 3 E : 0.880949 F :- 0.142954
i ng.
Bus no 4 E : 0.868707 F :- 0.154324
Bus no 5 E : 0.874648 F :- 0.143440
n et
The residual or mismatch vector for iteration no: 12 is
dp[2] = -0.000074
dp[3] = 0.000005
dp[4] = -0.000009
dp[5] = -0.000014
dQ[2] = 0.000008
dQ[3] = -0.000002
dQ[4] = -0.000001
dQ[5] = -0.000000
ww Questions
w.E
I. Explain why load flow studies are performed?
asy
2. Discuss the classification of buses.
En
3. With a neat flow chart explain the load flow solution by Gauss - Seidel method.
4. Explain the principle and method of solution of the load flow problem by Newton-
gi
Raphson (a) rectangular coordinates and (b) polar coordinates methods.
nee
5. Compare Gauss - Seidel method and Newton Raphson method for load flow solution
6. Explain
(a) rin
(i) Decoupled load flow and
g.n
(ii) Fast decoupled load flow methods
(b) What are the application of the methods in (a) et
Problems
P2.t Obtain a load flow solution for the system shown in Fig. P2.1 use
(i) Gauss - Seidel method
w.E
asy
E ngi
nee
rin
g.n
et
Bus code p-q Impedance Zpq Line charges Y pq/s
1-2 0.02 + jO.2 0.0
ww 5
w.E
Pl.2 Repeat problem P2.1 with line charging capacitance Yp/2 = jO.025 for each line
a
P2.3 Obtain the decoupled and fast decouple load flow solution for the system in P2.1 and
syE
compare the results with the exact solution.
- P2.4 For the 51 bus system shown in Fig. P2.1, the system data is given as follows in p.u.
ngi
Perform load flow analysis for the system
Line data
nee
Resistance Reactance Capacitance
2-3
3-4
0.0287
0.0028
0.0747
0.0036 rin
0.0322
0.0015
3-6
3-7
0.0614
0.0247
0.1400
0.0560
g
0.0558
0.0397 .ne
7-8
8-9
0.0098
0.0190
0.0224
0.0431
0.0091
0.0174
t
9-10 0.0182 0.0413 0.0167
Contd. ....
Downloaded From : www.EasyEngineering.net
Downloaded From : www.EasyEngineering.net
ww 12 - 25
25 -26
0.0866
0.0159
0.2847
0.0508
0.0283
0.0060
w.E
26-27 0.0872 0.2870 0.0296
27-28
0.0136
0.0436
0.0436
0.0045
0.0045
29-30
30- 31
E 0.0125
0.0136 ngi
0.0400
0.0436
0.0041
0.0045
27 - 31 0.0136
nee
0.0436 0.0045
rin
30- 32 0.0533 0.1636 0.0712
32 - 34 0.0471 0.1511
g.n
0.0650
30- 51
51-33
0.0667
0.0230
0.1765
0.0622
0.0734
0.0256 et
35 -50 0.0240 0.1326 0.0954
Contd. ••.•
ww 46-1
1-49
0.0343
0.01 \0
0.2087
0.0597
0.1686
0.1752
w.E
49-50
37 - 38
0.0071
0.0014
0.0400
0.0077
0.0272
0.0246
47-39
asy 0.0203 0.\093 0.0879
48-2
En 0.0426 0.1100 0.0460
gi
3 -35 0.0000 0.0500 0.0000
7-36
11-37
0.0000
0.0000
0.0450
0.0000
14-47
16- 39
0.0000
0.0000
0.0900
0.0900
r 0.0000
0.0000ing
18-40
20-42
0.0000
0.0000
0.0400
0.0800
0.0000
0.0000
. net
24-43 0.0000 0.0900 0.0000
ww
w.E
asy
E ngi
nee
rin
Fig. E2.1 51 Bus Power System
Bus P-Q
3 -35
TAP
1.0450 g.n
7-36
11-37
14-47
1.0450
1.0500
1.0600
et
16-39 1.0600
18 -40 1.0900
19-41 1.0750
20-42 1.0600
24-43 1.0750
30-46 1.0750
1-34 1.0875
21-22 1.0600
5-4 1.0800
27-45 1.0600
26-44 1.0750
Bus no Voltage magnitude Voltage phase angle Real power Reactive power
(p.u.) (p.u.) (p.u.)
ww
6
7
1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
-0.1900
-0.3300
-0.1000
- 0.1800
8
9
w.E1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
-0.4400
-0.2200
-0.2400
-0.1200
10
asy
1.0000 0.0000 -0.2100 -0.1200
II
12
13
E
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
ngi
0.0000
0.0000
- 0.3400
- 0.2400
- 0.1900
-0.0500
- 0.1360
-0.1100
14 1.0000 0.0000
nee -0.1900 -0.0400
15
16
1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.2400
-0.5400 rin 0.0000
-0.3000
17
18
1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
-0.4600
-0.3700
g.
-0.2100
net
- 0.2200
19 1.0000 0.0000 -0.3100 -0.0200
20 1.0000 0.0000 - 0.3400 -0.1600
21 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
22 1.0000 0.0000 - 0.1700 -0.0800
Contd. •.•.
Bus no Voltage magnitude Voltage phase angle Real power Reactive power
(p.u.) (p.u.) (p.u.)
29 1.0000 0.0000 - 0.2500 -0.1300
ww 32
33
1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
- 0.3000
0.5000
- 0.1700
0.0000
34
35
w.E 1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
- 0.5800
0.0000
-0.2600
0.0000
.-
36
asy1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
37
En
1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
gi
38 1.0000 0.0000 1.7000 0.0000
39
40
1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000 nee 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
41
42
1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000 r ing
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
43
44
1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.7500
. net
0.0000
0.0000
ww 50 1.0700 1.500
w.E
P2.4 The data for a 13 machine, 71 bus, 94 line system is given. Obtain the load flow
solution.
Data:
asy
En No. of buses
No. of lines
71
94
Contd. ....
w.E
21 0.0 0.0 32.0 19.8
22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
23 0.0 0.0 75.0 46.6
a
24
25 syE0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
133.0
0.0
82.5
26
27 ngi
0.0
300.0
0.0
75.0
• 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
28 0.0 0.0
nee30.0 20.0
29
30
260.0
0.0
70.0
0.0
0.0
120.0 rin 0.0
0.0
31 0.0 0.0 160.0
g.n
74.5
32
33
34
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
112.0
99.4
0.0
69.5
et
35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
36 0.0 0.0 50.0 32.0
37 0.0 0.0 147.0 92.0
38 0.0 0.0 93.5 88.0
39 25.0 30.0 0.0 0.0
40 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
41 0.0 0.0 225.0 123.0
42 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
43 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Contd. ....
ww 50
51
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
227.0
24.6
142.0
w.E 52
53
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
asy
54 0.0 0.0 \08.0 68.0
55
56 En 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.5
0.0
48.0
0.0
57
58
gi 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
55.6
nee
42.0
35.6
27.0
59 0.0 0.0 57.0 27.4
60 0.0 0.0
rin
0.0 0.0
61
62
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.0
27.0 g.n
63
64
0.0
300.0
0.0
75.0
33.2
0.0
20.6
0.0
et
65 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
66 96.0 25.0 0.0 0.0
.'
67 0.0 0.0 14.0 6.5
68 90.0 25.0 0.0 0.0
69 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
70 0.0 0.0 11.4 7.0
71 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LINE DATA
Line No From Bus To Bus Line impedance 112 Y charge Turns Ratio
ww 7
8
12
11
II
13
0.0000
0.0600
0.0530
0.1480
0.0000
0.0300
0.95
1.00
9
10
w.E14
13
13
16
0.0000
0.9700
0.0800
0.2380
0.0000
0.0270
1.00
1.00
11
asy
17 15 0.0000 0.0920 0.0000 1.05
En
12 7 6 0.0000 0.2220 0.0000 1.05
13 7 4 0.0000 0.0800 0.0000 1.00
14
15
16
4
4
4
3
5
12
gi
0.0000
0.0000
0.0160
0.0330
nee
0.1600
0.0790
0.0000
0.0000
0.0710
1.05
1.00
1.00
17
18
12
17
14
16
0.0160
0.0000
0.0790
0.0800
r 0.0710
0.0000 ing 1.00
0.95
19
20
2
4
4
26
0.0000
0.0190
0.0620
0.0950
0.0000
0.1930
. 1.00
0.00 net
21 2 1 0.0000 0.0340 0.0000 1.05
22 31 26 0.0340 0.1670 0.1500 1.00
23 26 25 0.0000 0.0800 0.0000 0.95
24 25 23 0.2400 0.5200 0.1300 1.00
25 22 23 0.0000 0.0800 0.0000 0.95
26 24 22 f).0000 0.0840 O.OOOG 0.95
27 22 17 0.0480 0.2500 0.0505 1.00
28 2 24 0.0\00 0.1020 0.3353 1.00
29 23 21 0.0366 0.1412 0.0140 1.00
30 21 20 0.7200 0.1860 0.0050 1.00
31 20 19 0.1460 0.3740 0.0\00 1.00
Contd. .••.
Line No From Bus To Bus Line impedance 1/2 Y charge Turns Ratio
32 19 18 0.0590 0.1500 0.0040 1.00
33 18 16 0.0300 0.0755 0.0080 1.00
34 28 27 0.0000 0.0810 0.0000 1.05
35 30 29 0.0000 0.06\0 0.0000 1.05
36 32 31 0.0000 0.0930 0.0000 0.95
37 31 30 0.0000 0.0800 0.0000 0.95
38 28 32 0.0051 0.0510 0.6706 1.00
ww 39
40
3
31
33
47
0.0130
0.0110
0.0640
0.0790
0.0580
0.1770
1.00
100
41
42
w.E 2
33
32
34
0.0158
0.0000
01570
0.0800
0.5100
0.0000
100
0.95
43
asy
35 33 0.0000 0.0840 0.0000 0.95
En
44 35 24 0.0062 0.0612 0.2120 1.00
45 34 36 0.0790 0.2010 0.0220 1.00
46
47
48
36
37
40
gi 37
38
0.1690
0.0840
0.4310
nee
0.1880
0.3800
0.0110
00210
0.0000
1.00
1.00
1.05
39 0.0000
49
50
40
38
38
41
0.0890
0.1090
r
0.2170
0.1960 ing
0.0250
0.2200
1.00
1.00
51
52
41
42
51
41
0.2350
0.0000
0.6000
0.0530
0.0160
0.0000
. net
1.00
0.95
53 45 42 0.0000 0.0840 0.0000 0.95
54 47 49 0.2100 0.1030 0.9200 1.00
55 49 48 0.0000 0.0460 0.0000 1.05
56 49 50 0.0170 0.0840 0.0760 1.00
57 49 42 0.0370 0.1950 0.0390 1.00
58 50 51 0.0000 00530 0.0000 0.95
59 52 50 0.0000 0.0840 0.0000 0.95
60 50 55 0.0290 0.1520· 0.0300 1.00
61 50 53 0.0100 0.0520 0.0390 1.00
62 53 54 0.0000 0.0800 0.0000 0.95
63 57 54 0.0220 0.0540 0.0060 1.00
Contd•....
Line No From Bus To Bus Line impedance 1/2 Y charge Turns Ratio
64 55 56 0.0160 0.0850 0.0170 1.00
65 56 57 0.0000 0.0800 0.0000 1.00
66 57 59 0.0280 o.ono 0.0070 1.00
67 59 58 0.0480 0.1240 0.0120 1.00
68 60 59 0.0000 0.0800 0.0000 1.00
69 53 60 O.OJ60 0.1840 0.3700 1.00
ww70
71
45
45
44
46
0.0000
0.0370
0.1200
0.0900
0.0000
0.0100
1.05
1.00
n
73 w.E46
46
41
59
0.0830
0.10'"70
0.1540
0.1970
0.0170
0.0210
1.00
1.00
74
75 asy
60
61
61
62
0.0160
0.0000
0.0830
0.0800
0.0160
0.0000
1.00
0.95
76
77
58
62 E 62
63
0.0420
ngi
00350
0.1080
0.0890
0.0020
0.0090
1.00
1.00
78
79
69
69
68
61
0.0000
0.0230 nee 0.2220
0.1160
0.0000
0.1040
1.05
1.00
80 67 66 0.0000
rin
0.1880 0.0000 1.05
g.n
81 65 64 0.0000 0.0630 0.0000 1.05
82 65 5'6 0.0280 0.1440 0.0290 1.00
83
84
85
65
65
67
61
67
63
0.0230
0.0240
0.0390
0.1140
0.0600
0.0990
0.0240
0.0950
0.0100
et
1.00
1.00
1.00
86 61 42 0.0230 0.2293 0.0695 1.00
87 57 67 0.0550 0.2910 0.0070 1.00
88 45 70 0.1840 0.4680 0.0120 1.00
89 70 38 0.1650 0.4220 0.0110 1.00
90 33 71 0.0570 0.2960 0.0590 1.00
91 71 37 0.00(,)0 0.0800 0.0000 0.95
92 45 41 0.1530 0.3880 0.1000 1.00
93 35 43 0.0131 0.1306 0.4293 1.00
94 52 52 0.0164 0.1632 0.5360 1.00
ww 5
6
28
31
0.00
0.00
- 0.3375
0.2000
w.E 7
8
32
34
0.00
0.00
-0.8700
0.2250
asy 9
10
35
36
0.00
0.00
- 0.3220
0.1000
gi
12
13
14
38
41
43
0.00
0.00
0.00 nee
0.2000
0.2000
-0.2170 .
15
16
46
47
0.00
0.00 r0.1000
0.3000 ing
17
18
19
50
51
52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.1000
0.1750
-0.2700
. net
20 54 0.00 0.1500
21 57 0.00 0.1000
22 59 0.00 0..0750
23 21 0.00 0.0500
ww
w.E
3 ECONOMIC
asy OPERATION OF
En
POWER SYSTEMS
gin
eer
ing
Planning operation and control of interconnected power systems presents a variety of challenging
problems. An important problem in this area is the economic operation of the system, which
.
means, that every step in planning, scheduling and operation of the system, unit-wise, plant
net
wise and inter connection-wise must be optimal, leading to absolute economy. In this, the
transmission losses too play an important role. In this chapter on econOl)1ic operation of
power system, both thermal and hydro system will be dealt with using suitable analytical
models that result in meaningful savings.
the cost effective mode of generation allocation among the various units. This can also be
termed as optimal operation. The analytical solution proposed in general for optimal operation
depends on incremental cost concept.
ww Turbine
3.2 w.E
Input Output Cunres
asy
As has been already stated the input output characteristics for arty thermal unit or units that
comprise the plant can be obtained from the operating data. The input can be in kilo calories
En
per hour and the output may be in kilowatts or preferably in maga watts. Typical characteristic
gi
is shown in Fig. 3.I(b) for the unit shown in Fig. 3.I(a).
nee
1...
.eOJ
r ing
~
~
'r
'5
0-
. net
.:
-.:;
----
~ 'Min
Power output (P) MW •
The characteristic in practice may not be such a smooth idealized curve and from the
practical data such an idealized curve can be interpolated.
Steam turbine generating unit characteristics may have minimum and maximum limits
in operation. \
They may be determined by factors such as steam cycle used, operating tempera~ures,
material thermal characteristics.
ww
w .Ea ,,
I
syE, ,,
I
,,
I
,n
gi 'Min
nee
Output (MW) P --+
I
,Max
r ing
Fig. 3.2 Incremental fuel rate characteristic for thermal unit
,,,
I
,,
,,
,, ,,
'Min , Max
Power output (MW) --+
Fig. 3.3 Incremental fuel cost characteristic for thermal unit
ww I \
\
w.E
asy
En
Min
gin-.
Power output (MW)
Rated Max
eer
Fig. 3.4 Heat rate characteristic
Large turbine-generator units may have several steam admission valves which are opened
in a sequence to meet the increasing steam demand. The input output characteristic for such
a unit with two valves may show discontinuity as shown in Fig. 3.5.
ww
w.E I
I
asy
I
I Min Max
Power output (MW) --.
En
Fig. 3.5 Input-output characteristic for multiple admission valves (for two valves)
3.7 gi
Characteristics of Hydro Plants
nee
The input output characteristics for hydro units can be obtained in the same way as for thermal
rin
units on the assumption of constant water head. The input-output characteristic may be as
shown in Fig. 3.6. The ordinates are water input or discharge in cubic meters per second
g.n
shown against power output in megawatts. While the water requirement is nearly linear till
rated load, after that the efficiency decreases and greater discharge is required to meet the
increased load demand.
et
t
It may be noted that, if the head varies the input-output characteristics change. 11 will
move vertically upwards, as head falls and vice versa since the hydro power generatbd is
directly related to the head of the water level and as head falls, higher water discharge is
required for the same power generation. Similarly as head rises lesser discharge is needed.
The characteristic moves downwards. This is shown in Fig. 3.7.
ww
w.E
asy
En Power output (MW) ~
3.8 gi
Fig. 3.7 Effect of head on discharge for hydro unit
rin
same way as for thermal units. A typical characteristic is shown in Fig. 3.8.
g.n
As the input-o.utput curve is linear for a greater part, the incremental water rate
characteristic is a horizontal line over this region indicating constant slope, and thereafter it
rises rapidly. With increase in load, more and more units will have to be brought into service .
et
.---------t~
I :
I I
Power output (MW)
ww
w.E Power output (MW) ~
asy
Fig. 3.9 Multiple unit operation incremental water-rate characteristic
En
The conversion of incremental water rate into incremental production cost requires
considerations of agriculture, navigation, drinking needs of water, and other riparian rights etc.
gi
even through water is available freely in nature. Further the cost of dam~ canals, conduits,
nee
gates, penstocks and other parts of hydro development are also involved.
g.n
characteristic by multiplying the incremental water rate characteristic by water rate or cost of
water in rupees per cubic meter C\~. The incremental production cost characteristic is shown
in Fig. 3.10.
et
-
t il
.~t..ai CI
:::l I
"8:::
~E
til til
cCX:
Q)
E
...
Q)
u
.5
0 PHI P H2
Power output (MW)
wwThe total cost of operating a system with N g generating sets can be represented by
Ng
w.E F = IC,p,
,=1
..... (3.5)
If the system operates over a time period T then the total expenditure involved will be
aS!sy TN"
c, P, (ndt
En
FT =
0,=1
..... (3.6)
gi
Steam plants with partial admission nozzle governing give better performance at partial
nee
loads since the cost coefficient increases with increasing megawatt loading. However, such
units cannot be shut down, frequently, because of the complexities of steam chest. But, steam
plants with throttle governing are more suitable for periodic shut down due to their simpler
r ing
steam chest. Such units are more suitable for rapid starting and loading. From minimum to
maximum permissible limits of operation, the cost coefficients of the units are substantially
constant.
ww 11
P, = L:V,V1Y"Cos(O, -Ol-e ll )
1=1
..... (3.11 )
asy
with usual notation and G, and H, are the residuals at bus i which should become zero at the
point of solution.
E ngi
In addition, a number of other constrains due to physical and operational limitations of
nee
the units and components will arise in economic scheduling. These are in the form of inequality
constraints.
rin
Each generator in operation will have a minimum and maximum permissible output and
the production must be constrained to ensure that
p,mm:s P, :s p,ma" i = I, 2 .... , ng
g.n ..... (3.13)
Similarly limits may also have to be considered over the range of reactive power
capabilities of the generator units requiring that
Q,mm :s Q, :s Q,ma" i = 1,2 .... , nq
et ..... (3.14)
where nq is the total number of reactive sources in the system.
Further, the constraint
P,:! + O,1:s (S,fated)2 ..... (3.15)
must be satisfied, where S is the MVA capacity of the generating unit for limiting stator heating.
Dynamic limits may also have to be considered when fast changes in generation are
envisaged for picking up or for shedding down of loads. These limits put additional constraints
of the form.
.. ... (3.16)
The maximum and minimum operating conditions for a group of generators within a
power station may be different from the respective sum of the maximum and minimum operating
levels of turbines that are supplied by a single boiler. The extremes ofboiler operating conditions
will determine these limits. Thus. groups of generators from individllal boiler units may have
to be subjected to additional constraints of the nature
Pkgill'" <
-
Pkl <
-
plIl,l\ k ~ I'"
kg'
(' R
- , - ..... J ..... (3.17)
1f.(1
where GR is the total number of generator groups. the outputs of which are to be
separately limited.
ww Spare capacity is required to account for the errors in load prediction, sudden and fast
changes in load demand and the inadvertent loss of scheduled generation. Thus. the total
w.E
generation G available at any time must be in excess of the total anticipated load demand and
system losses by an amount not less than a specified minimum spare capacity Psp'
asy G~
ng
L P, + PSP ..... (3.18)
En 1=1
gi
generators, where all plants are not equally operationally suitable for taking up additional load.
If TG is the total number of groups then
nee
LP
Gk ~
If.Ci
kl + p~G
rin ..... (3.19)
s: mill
011
< I: < s: max ,1--
-0'l-0'l
. - I 2
....... ,n ..... (3.22)
where n is the total number of nodes and m is the number of nodes neighbouring each node
with interconnecting branches.
In case transformer tap positions are to be included for optimization, then the tap
positions T) must lie within the range available, i.e.
Sometimes, phase shifting transformers are made available in the system. If such
equipment exists then constraints of the type
ww ..... (3.24 )
w.E
must be reckoned where PSI is the phase shift obtained from the ith phase shifting
transformer.
a syE
If power system security is also required to be considered in the formulation for economic
operation then power flows between certain important buses may also have to be considered
for the final solution. It may be mentioned that consideration of each and every possible
ngi
branch for outage will not be a feasible proposition.
ww
Method of Lagrange multipliers:
It is but natural that for a given load to be allocated between several generating units, the most
w.E
efficient unit identified by incremental cost of production should be the one to get priority.
When this is applied repeatedly to all the units the load allocation will become complete when
all of them, that are involved in operation, are all working at the same incremental cost of
production.
asy
The above can be proved mathematically as follows:
ngi
hour.
nee
The objective function for minimization is the total input to the system in rupees per
ng
g. net
where C,(P) is the generation cost for the ith unit and ng is the total number of generating
units.
The equality constraint is given by
ng
G (PI' P"
_ ... , Png ) = G(P)" Po - LP, =-0 ..... (3.26)
"I
i.e., total supply = total demand neglecting losses and reserve. Using the method of Lagrange
multipliers for equality constraints. the Lagrange function is defined as
L(P, A) == F(P) + AG(P) ..... (3.27)
Where A is a Langrange multiplier.
The necessary conditions are given by
aL
-=0, and ..... (3.28)
OP,
..... (3.29)
ng (ng )
since L= ~ C, (P, ) + Al Po - ~ P, ..... (3 .30)
elL ?
we obtain - = -- C (P ) + A( -I) = 0 ..... (3.31)
(lP, oP, ' ,
(0L ng
and - ' = PD - LP =0 ..... (3.32)
CA ,=1 '
The later equation is the load demand constraint only; while the former gives
asy
same incremental cost for optimum economy and their incremental production cost is equal to
the Lagrange multiplier A at the optimum.
En
Eqn. (3.32) gives
nee
..... (3.34)
The principle underlying the mathematical treatment is that load should be taken up
always at the lowest incremental cost. It must be ensured that the generations so determined
r ing
are within their capacities. Otherwise, the generation has to be kept constant at the capacity
limit for that unit and eliminated from further optimum calculations.
. net
It can be seen that in this method at the optimum the incremental cost of production is
also the incremental cost of the power received. Eqn. (;;.33) and (3.34) can be solved for
economic scheduling analytically neglecting the effect of transmission losses.
The size of the power systems increased enormously, with long transmission lines
connecting several power generating stations extending over large geographical areas transferring
power to several load centers. With this development, it has become necessary to consider not
only the incremental fuel costs but also incremental transmission losses incurred in these lines
while power is transmitted. Initial attempts in this direction involved development of a
comprehensive formula involving the generating powers and line parameters. The most important
work has come from Kirchmayer and others in 1951. Their method is based on a set of
coefficients called B. coefficients. Determination of these coefficients is based on several
assumptions and is mathematically quite involved requiring transformations.
However, due to the elegance of the B-coefficient formula and simplicity in application
these coefficients are widely used by a number of power companies in the past in USA and
elsewhere for economic scheduling for including the effect of transmission losses.
ww Power Network
asy
En
Generators
gi
Fig. 3.11 Power system with generator and load currents
nee
Consider a network element K (an inter connected line in the system) carrying current
IK. Let generator I alone supply the entire load current IL where
rin
'L = iLl + iL2 + .......... + iLnl
nl g.n
= fi
1=1
L.!
In a similar manner if each of the ng generators operating alone also supply the total load
current IL while the rest of the generators are disconnected the current carried by the network
element K changes from iKI to iK2 ' iK3 to iKng .
Let the ratio of iK I to iL be dK1
..... (3.36)
Also
and so on.
Now, if all the generators are connected to the power system simultaneously to supply
the same load, by the principle of super position.
..... (3.37)
Let the individual load currents remain a constant complex ratio of the total load current
Iv It is assumed that (X/R) ratio for all the line elements or branches in the network remains
the same. The factors dK1 will then be real and not complex.
The individual generator currents may have phase angles 8 1, 82, .•.•• 8ng with respect to
a reference axis. The generator currents can be expressed as :
a syE
igng =li~'11!!lcos8ng +lignglsin81l!!
For simplicity to derive the formula
ngi
Let ng = 3 so that eqn. (3.37) becomes
rin
g.n
et
..... (3.41)
..... (3.42)
d
+ 2d u d k i g3!!i gl! cos(8~ - 8 1 )
ww
w.E .
Ig2
P?
= .J3IV21~os~:> and
asy
En
gi
where PI' P2 and P3 are the active power supplied by the generators 1,2 and 3 at voltages IV II,
nee
IV 21 and IV 31 and power factors at the generator buses being COS ~I' COS ~2 and Cos <1>3
respectively.
rin
g.n
31VIIIV21cos<l>I COS~2 3IV21IV~lcOS~2 cos~\
et
+ 2dkldk2PIP2 cos(8 1 - ( 2) + 2d U d Io. J P:>PJ cos(8 2 -8J
The power losses in the network comprising of nb network elements or branches PLOSS
is given by
ng
2PIP2Ldkldk2RK cos(8 1 - ( 2 )
k=1
+
ww +
ng
2P2 P3L dk2 d U R Kcos(8 2
-
_---;'k'-'=I'-::--:-_ _ _ __
8J
asy ng
2P3 PI Ld k3 d KI R Kcos(8 3 -( 1 )
+
En -----7"k=-'.I-,c--.,.------
Iv31 vd cos <P3 COS<PI
..... (3.43)
Let
gi nee ..... (3.44)
rin
g.n ..... (3.45)
et
..... (3.46)
..... (3.47)
..... (3.48)
..... (3.49)
ww
In general the formula for Bmn coefficients can be expressed
= cos( 8 III - 8 11 )
a~
w.E B
mil I I I(
Y m Vn Cos'!'m X
A. Cos'!'n
"
A.) L-k
d d R
~m kn I<,.
..... (3.51 )
asy
In the matrix form, the loss formula is expressed for an n generator system as :
En .... Pn ]
BII
B21
BI2
B22
Bin
B 2n
PI
P2
gi
[PI P2
Bnl Bn2
nee
Bnn Pn
..... (3.52)
r
The coefficients can be considered constant, if in addition to the assumptions already
ing
made we further assume that the generator voltages V I' V2' .••. etc remain constant in magnitude
.
and generator bus power factors cos <PI' cos <P2 ....... also remains constant.
must be satisfied at every generator bus where PI is the generation at bus i ; PD' the total load
demand and PL the total transmission loss in all the lines. It is desired to minimize
eqn. (3.53) subject to the constraint eqn. (3.54)
The Lagrange function L is formed as
..... (3.55)
a ~l =0
o[
ww oL
-(P,A)=-F(pJ+-A
oPI oPI OPI
Po + PL - LP,
1=1
..... (3.56)
i.e., w.E a
-C[PI ....... ,PI,. .. Png]+-A ~ I =0
c [ PD+PL-LP 1 ..... (3.57)
E ng1;i
..... (3.58)
Further,
oPI nee
OC j (PI) = 1.[1 - oL
oPI
i == 1,2 ....... ng ..... (3.59)
et
The sum of the incremental production cost of power at any plant i and the incremental
transmission losses incurred due to generation PI at bus i charged at the rate of A must be
constant for all generators and equal to A. This constant A is equal to the incremental cost of
the received power.
In section (3.16) the loss formula is derived as
..... (3.61)
Differentiating
dCI(PI ) ~
--'-'-'-'- + L 2BIli = A J'= I, 2, ..... , ng ..... (3.64)
dPI 1=1
ww
input-output characteristic.
Then, denoting
w.E dCI(PI ) _ P b
dPI
-a l I + I ..... (3.65)
Further,
E
al PI + b l + AL2BIli = A
J=I
ngi
..... (3.66)
rin
Eqn. (3.66) can be rewritten as
alPI + b l + A2B11 PI + ALBIJP, = A g.n
alPj +b l + A2B11 PI +ALBlJ =A
ng
1=1
et
)"1
solving for PI
ng
A- bl - AL2B I l,
1=1
)"1 ..... (3.68)
PI = - - - - ' - - - -
a l + 2AB11
b
1- -L - ~' 2B P
~ I) 1
II- 1=1
PI = _ _ _)::-"_1_ _ ; i = 1,2, ..... , ng ..... (3.69)
i +2BI1
There are ng equations to be solved for ng powers (P) for which Gauss's or
Gauss - Seidel method is well suited. Knowing ai' bl , and BIJ coefficients for any assumed
value of A, PI values may converge to a solution, giving the generator scheduled powers. It is
very important that a suitable value is assumed for A, so that a quick convergence of the
equations is obtained.
dC I (PI) + A oP L -= A
dPI oPI
ww It can be rewritten as
A[I- 1
w.E
in other words
OCI(P) -=
oPI
oPL
oPI
..... (3.70)
asy
OC8~~I) [1-E~ln=A ..... (3.71)
gin OPI
eer
When transmission losses are included, the incremental production cost at each plant i
must be multiplied by a factor (1 _~] which then will be equal to the incremental cost of
i ng.
oPI
n et
power delivered. Hence, the factor [
1--
~PL 1 is called penalty factor:
oPI
·
Smce -oPL .
IS muc h Iess th · some times
an umty . .It IS
. approximate
. d by I + -oPL so th at
~ ~
oP
The term 1 + _L is called approximate penalty factor.
oPI
b ng
1- --;- - L2BIlJ
fI. J=I
P = _ _ _J,-",_I- - ; i =1, 2, ..... ,ng
I ai
i+2BIIPj
ww
solution to PI values depends upon the value of l. chosen. The value of A determines a set of
w.E
generations for a particular received load.
a syE
with two different values of A. As the arbitrarity assigned generations are improved from
iteration to iteration, a new value of A may be computed for each new iteration using the
ngi
following algorithm for a specified total received load power PRo
rin
where p~I-I) = received power with A(I-I)
g.n
p t 2) = received power with
= ~PI -PL
i=1
to P:.
E 3.1 -Consider a power system with two generating stations. The incremental production
cost characteristics for the two stations are
of
_I = (27.5 + 0.15P I )Rs / MwHr
oPI
of
_2 = (19.5 + 0.26P 2 )Rs / MwHr
OP2
Given that the minimum and maximum powers are 10 MW and 100 MW -at each plant
schedule the generation at each plant to supply a system load given by the load curve
shown in figure.
ww 200 -------------,.---,
w.E 150
ngi
100 ----...---~
I
nee
I
I I
I I
50 t----+----r------
L -+---,
I I
rin
o~-----~----~--~----~~--~
C 6
Time (t) ----+ 12g.n
12
Mid night
a.rn 12 3 6 10
noon p.rn p.rn p.rn
oFI = oF2 =A
OPI OP2
27.5 + 0.15 PI == 19.5 + 0.26 P2
27.5 + 0.15 (50 - P2)== 19.5 + 0.26 P2
27.5 - 19.5 + 7.50 == 0.26 P2 + 0.15P 2
15.5 == 0.41P2; P2 == 37.8
PI = 50 - 37.8 = 12.2 MW
w.E
27.5 + 18.75 - 19.5 = 0.15 P2 + 0.26 P2 = 0.41 P2
26.75 = 0.4IP 2
asy
therefore and
P2 = 65.24MW
Case (iv) :
E
PI = 59.76MW
P I +P 2 =150MW
ngi
nee
27.5 + 0.15 (150 - PI) = 19.5 + 0.26 P2
27.5 + 22.5 - 19.5 = 0.26 P2 + 0.15 P2
30.5 = 0.41 P2; P2 = 74.39
rin
Case (v) :
PI = 75.61
PI + P2 = 200 MW g. net
27.5 + (0.15) (200 - P2) = 19.5 + 0.26 P2
27.5 + 30 - 19.5 = 0.41 P2
38 = 0.41 P2 ; P2 = 92.68 ; PI = 107.32
The value of A can be computed now. The results are tabulated.
Case PI P2 PD A.
Case (i) 12.2 37.8 50 29.33
EJ.2 The fuel input characteristics for two thermal plants are given by
w.E
the same against power produced in MW.
Solution:
(i)
asy
Input-output characteristic
Consider the power in steps of 10MW
Given that
En
and gi
F I=(8P,+0.024+80)10 6 K-cal/hr
F2=(6P I+0.004+120)106 K-cal/hr
nee
Substituting PI and P2 in steps of 10 MW the values of F, and F2 are obtained and
tabulated.
rin
Table E 3.2.1 Input Output Calculations
g.n
P1(MW)
10
Fl x 106 K-cal/hr
162.4
P1(MW)
10
Fl x 106K-callhr
184
et
20 250 20 256
30 342 30 336
40 438 40 424
50 540 50 520
60 646 60 624
70 758 70 736
80 874 80 856
90 994 90 984
100 1.220 100 II 20
1(0)
ww
w.E
asy Fig . E 3.2.1 Input - Out put curves
(ii) En
Heat rate characteristic
gi
Let P I = 10 MW at plant I
· p. 162.4
Heat rate at t h IS I IS - - x 10
10
6 K - cal / hr
MW nee
At plant 2 for P2 = 10 MW
rin
Heat rate = -184 x 106 =.
10
18 4 105
x
K - cal / hr
MW g.n
100 MW at both the plants. The results are tabulated and curves are plotted.
Table E 3.2.2 Heat Rate Calculations
et
In a similar manner the heat rate is computed for powers in steps of 10 MW till
OutputMW Heat rate x 106 at plant 1 K-caVMW-h Heat rate x 106 at plant 2 K-caVMW-hr
10 1625 18.4
~ 12.48 12.8
30 11.39 11.2
40 10.96 10.6
50 10.80 10.4
ro 10.77 10.4 '
'Xl 10.82 10.,5
ro 10.92 10.7
~ II.OS" 10.93
100 112 11.2
ww
w.E
asy
En Fig. E 3.2.2 Heat rate curves
(iii)
gi nee
Calorific values of fuel at plant t = 4000 K-cal/hr
'--.
Cost of fuel
tOORs I kg rin
= Rs.t 00 per ton = Rs I 001 I 000 per kg
100 Rs
=
1000 kg
x-----:::
4000 k - cal 6
--
4 x t 0 k - cal
g.n
dFI ::: (8 + 0.048P )1 0 6 K - cal
dPI
1
MwHr
et
Incremental fuel cost
6 100 Rs
= (8 + 0.048 PI) 10 x -- 6 - -
4x 10 MwHr
= (2 + 0.012 PI) x 100 = (200 + 1.2 PI) Rs/MWHr
At 100 MW generation, the cost is
(200 + 12) = 212 Rs/MWHr
The incremental production cost is obtained by adding the maintanance costs
of 10%
Hence, the incremental production cost at plant 1
::: (200 + 1.2 PI) 1.I = (220 + 1.32 PI)
w.E
At P2 = 10MW, the incremental production cost
= (120 + 1.6 = (136 = 149.6 Rs/
MWHr
asy x 10) x 1.1 x 1.1) Rs/MWHr
E
Like wise, the incremental production costs are calculated at all power levels and
ngi
tabulated. Finally the value are plotted as shown in table (E3.2).
nee
Table E 3.2.3 Incremental prodOlction costs
ww
w.E
asy
En
gin
Fig . E 3.2.3 Incremental production cost curves
eer
E 3.3 For the plants in example E3.2 obtain the economic generation schedule. The load
curve is given in Fig. (E3 .3)
i ng.
200
n et
i ISO
100
SO -------
I I 1
12 6 12 6 12
a.m noon p.m
Time (t) - - - .
Solution:
For economic schedule
a syE
:. PI=O
If a minimum generation limit is imposed then P I= IOMW and P2 = 40MW
Case (ii) P = 200MW
ngi
200 + 1.32 (200 - P2) = 1.32 + 1.76P2
nee
220 - 132 + 264 = 176 P2 + 1.32 P2 = 3.08 P2
352 = 3.08 P2
rin
P2 = 114.2857 ~
g.n
If a maximum generation limit of 100MW is imposed then
P2 = 100MW and hence PI = 100MW
et
E 3.4 Given a two bus system as shown in Fig. (E 3.4)
2
200MW 75 MW
Line
N~~----------------------~~N
Fig. E 3.4
It is observed that when a power of 75MW is imported to bus I, the loss amounted to
5MW. Find the generation needed from each plant and also the power received by the
oload, if the system A. is given by Rs.20/MWHr. The incremental fuel cost at the two
plants are given by 0
o
dC I (PI) = 0.03PI + 15Rs I Mwh
odPI
ww
Solution:
Thereforew.E
The load is at bus I. Hence, P, will not have any effect on the line losses
B I , = B'2 =; B 2 , =0
a syE
PL = B22
5 = B22 75 2
pi
B22 ngi
=-~- =8.9 X 10-4
At station I
5~250
nee
rin
g.n
At station 2
et (i)
ww
E 3.5 A power system with two generating stations supplied a total load of300MW. Neglecting
transmission losses the economic schedule for the plant generation is 175MW and
w.E
125MW. Find the saving in the production cost in Rs/hr. due to this economic schedule
as compared to equal distribution of the same load between the two units.
The incremental cost characteristics are
En
t
dP I
Solution:
gi dC 2(P 2) = 32.5 + 0.4P
dP2
2
nee
The cost of generation at Plant 1
=
I
ww dPI
Solution:
gi
Find the economic schedule of generation for", = 20Rs/MWhr
nee
=
16
r
-~:-:------ ing
1- 20 -2(-0.0005)P2 0.2 + 0.001P
2
= ----..::..
0.08 + 2(0.001)
20
. 0.006
net
1 __
2
b -2B I2 PI 1-~~-2(-0.0005)PI 0.4+0.00IP
P2 = _--'' '-0..-___ == == 2
B l1 P12 + 2B 12 P1 P2 + B22 Pi
= (0.001) x (41.7)2 + 2 (-0.0005) (41.7) (50.2)
+ (0.0024).(50.2)2 = 5.7MW
2
Total generation = PT = LP =41.7 + 50.2 =919Mw
wwTotal power received
i=l
2
asy
Conventional hydroelectric plants are classified as run - of - river plants, run - of - river
plants with pondage and storage type phmts. In the former type water is utilized as is available
En
in the stream, as there is no provision for storage. Where there is pondage provision, hourly
fluctuations in load can be met. In the later type, where storage is provided the water stored
gi
during the excess water period can be utilized during the lean season or when power demand
nee
is high. The plant may be a single development on a river or there may be several plants
constructed and cascaded on the same river (Fig. 3.13). In some cases inter connection of
r
plants on different streams is also possible.
ing
. net
Power
Tail
_-.::- ...race
'-- ............
Fig. 3.13 Cascaded hydro electric plants
ww
w.E
asy
En r-----~~-r----------70--------~ P
12gi I------rl;=rl
Power
nee
am
12
r ing
p.rn
Load Curve
Power
supplied . net
·12
Let ee be the energy spent to pump water to the reservoir. By releasing this water at
peak load times the energy supplied to the load is es' The ratio (eglee) is usually of the order
60-70%. Pumped storage plants are to be operated in such a manner that due to the p~ load
chipping on the load curve, the saving in fuel cost thus achieved should exceed the pumping of
water charges.
may be more than thermal generation in some other cases it may be the other way. The
operating cost of thermal plants is high even though their capital cost is low. In case of hydro
electric plants, the running costs are very low, but the capital cost is high as construction of
dams, canals, penstocks, surge tanks and other elements of development are involved in addition
to the power house. The hydro plants can be started easily and can be assigned load in very
short time. This is not so in case of thermal plants, as it requires several hours to bring the
boiler, super heater, and turbine system ready to take the load allotment. For the reason
mentioned, the hydro plants can handle fast changing loads effectively. The thermal plants in
contrast are slow in response. For this reason, the thermal plants are more suitable to operate
as base load plants, leaving hydro plants to operate as peak load plants.
ww
However, the exact mode of operation depends upon the type of the development, and
factors such as storage and pondage, and the amount of water that is available is the most
w
important consideration. A plant may be run - off river, run - off river with pondage, storage
or pumped storage type.
.Ea
Whatever, may be the type of plant, it is necessary to utilize the total quantity of water
syE
available in hydro development so that maximum economy is achieved. The economic scheduling
in the integrated operation is however, made difficult as water release policy for power is
ngi
subject to a variety of constraints. There are multiple water usages which are to be satisfied.
Determination of the so called pseudo - fuel cost or cost for water usage for use in conjunction
nee
with incremental water rate characteristic is a formidable exercise. Nevertheless, hydro thermal
economic scheduling is possible with assumptions made wherever necessary.
r
In systems where there is close balance between hydro and thermal generation and in
ing
systems where the hydro capacity is only a fraction of the total capacity, it is generally desired
.
to schedule generation such that thermal generating costs are minimized.
ww K
Hydro energy to be utilized = LPHk n K
k=l
..... (3.78)
w.E
Thermal energy required
intervals Ks
E
Let the thermal plant be operated for time period less than Tmax and for number of
ngi
Hence,
nee ..... (3.80)
et
MinFT =
k=!
dF(PSk )
(i.e.) -.:-=:.;.. =A for k = 1,2, ...... , Ks ..... (3.85)
dP Sk
Eqn. (3.85) indicates that the steam plant must be run at constant incremental production
cost for the entire time period of its operation. Denoting this value as P~k' the schedule is
depicted in Fig. (3.15) graphically.
ww
w.E
o
k >1
asy Fig. 3.15 Hydro thermal co-ordination
En
gi
Let the steam plant cost characteristic be expressed by
F(Ps ) = aP~ + bPs + C
nee
The total cost of running the steam plant over the interval Ts
..... (3.86)
FT = !F(p~)nk
. net
k=l
..... (3.88)
Further
..... (3.89)
E
T =_s
Hence, ..... (3.90)
s P~
...... (3.92)
ww
w.E
asy ..... (3.93)
En
The steam unit is operated at its maximum efficiency through out the time period Ts'
gi
This can be proved as follows:
Let fc be the fuel cost.
nee
F(P s) = a
=fcH(Ps)
pi + bPs + c
r ing ..... (3.94)
where function H denotes the heat value
The heat rate is then given by
. net
H(Ps )
Ps
= ~[aPi + bPs +
fc Ps
c] ..... (3.95)
..... (3.96)
P =
s k-=Pso
a ..... (3.97)
Hydro
POWER
SYSTEM Power demand
ww Steam
Let the combined operation be over a period of time T. Let this time period be divided
syE
into intervals 1, 2, ..... J to suit the load curve so that
J
Ln J =T
J=1 ngi ..... (3.98)
nee
The total volume of water available for discharge over this time period.
r
Where Wj is the water rate for interval j. The fuel cost required to be minimized over ing . .... (3.99)
FT =Lnl(Ps)
J
. net
..... (3.100)
j=l
The loads are assumed to remain constant during time intervals considered. The total
value of water at the beginning and at the vend of the interval T, in the reservoir are Wi and Wf
respectively.
During this period of scheduling the head of water is assumed to remain constant.
The input - output characteristic for the equivalent hydro plant is given by
w = w(PH) •...• (3.102)
The Lagrange function for minimization of eqn. (3.100) subject to the constraints (3.99)
and (3.101) is \
ww
and
w.E ..... (3.105)
asy
solution to above two equations gives the economic generations at steam and hydro plants over
any time interval. The incremental production cost at the steam plants must be the same as
En
incremental production cost at the hydro plants. For simplicity nk may be taken one unit.
So that
dFs =A
dPs gi nee
and
dw
y.-=A
dPH rin ... :.(3.106)
..... (3.108)
dWk aPLk
and ynk --(PHk)+Yk - - = A.k
dPHk aPHk
since k is chosen arbitrarily, and by considering the time period nk = 1
The equations reduce to
ww dPs aPs
Y dw(Pk ) + A. aPL = A.
and
w.E dP H aPH
..... (3.110)
It can be shown that the above equations are valid for any number of steam plants ns
Hence a
and for any number of hydro plants nH.
syE
dF(PSi )
ngi aPL
--'---"''"'-+A.--=A.
dPsl aPSi
.
for 1-1, 2, ......... , ns ..... (3.111)
and
dw(PHk )
Y dP
aPL
nee
+A. aP = A. for k = 1,2, ........ , nH ••••• (3.112)
Hk Hk
rin
the above equations are called coordination equations, the solution to which will give tlle
economic schedule for Psi and PHk.
g.n
3.24.3 Short Term Hydro Thermal Scheduling using B-Coemcients for
Transmission losses et
Let the total number of generating stations be 'n'. Out of these n stations, S stations are steam
power stations and the remaining H stations are hydro electric generating stations so that
S+H = n ..... (3.113)
Let the water input rate at the jth hydro plant be assumed as Wj m3/sec
The total transmission losses in the lines of the system are given by
s s n n
PL =:£ :£ P B, PsJ· +:£ :£ PH' B .. I1IJ.
i=l j=l 51 1J i=s+l j=s+l 1 1J
s n
+2:£ :£ P, B ..
i=l j=s+1 51 1J
l1Ii~ ..... (3.114)
_ dFI Rsl
- dP. IMwhr ..... (3.116)
51
The incremental transmission losses at steam and hydro plants are given respectively by
ww 8Ps! 8PHJ
The incremental rate of water flow at jth hydro plant
w.E%
__ J m
_
Ow·
- OP sec ..... (3.117)
asy Hj
The total power received by the loads,
s
P=LP+ En n
LP.-I\. ..... (3.118)
R
gi i=l 51 j=s+l HJ
nee
It is desired to make the total input to the system over a period T a minimum.
From Calculus of variations for FT to be a minimum over the time period T, the first
variation of eq. (3.118) must be set equal to zero.
rin
s
L op·+
i=l SI
L
n
j=s+l
OP.- L
HJ
s· 8PL
--
i=l apsi
0 p. -
SI
n
~
oPL
--8P
j=s+lOPHj g.n
HJ = 0 ..... (3.119)
T
f
[ FTdt + J=~+l Y
n
J f 1
T
wjdt ..... (3.121)
..... (3.122)
s 17FT n Owj
i.e., L - ap L r·--aPH· - 0 ..... (3.123)
i=1 aPsi si + j=s+1 J aPHj J - ......
Where OPsi and aPHj are the variations in steam power generation and hydro power
generation respectively.
From equation (3.119)
~i=1(1- aPsi - -1
aPL 1Opsi + Ln [ 1 -171\ a~j=o ... (3.124)
j=s+l a~j
wwFor a small variation of oPHm at the mth hydro plant eqn. (3.124) can be split into the
following form.
w~l.E ±
[ 1 - ~ ap11m = - [1 - oPL ] ap -.
oP.
~
J=s+l
(1 - 0It. )aPHi"
OllI ..... (3.125)
asy
1=1 51 J
j*m
Again, eqn. (3.123) can be rewritten as
En
Hence gi nee
..... (3.126)
Ow aF Ow
r
C1 n
Ym-_m apHm =- L ap -Y L aPH
ing
_T _J
ap'Hm 1=1 ap.. 51 J J=5+1 8P, ~ ..... (3.127)
p'm HJ
(1- a~ J8PHm is replaced by the quantity on the right hand side of eqn. (3.124) we
~
obtam.
.. .... (3.129)
soFT
=-I:-oP
I=IOP
( OPL 1
51 ll--)-Y
oRlim JJ"m
J=s+1
Ow J
I:n -oR [OPL
ORHJ. H C 1:iD.._.
-- 1 ....... (3.130)
Sl V~ l1J
OItl
ww + I:n
~=s+ 1
J~m
J
Owj
r· - - [ 1 - - - oPJij-
OPHj Ol\Ij
w.E ~ Ow m ( OPL 1
~=s+l Ym ~ll- oP. ) oPHj = 0 ..... (3.131)
asy J~m
J _ El
.~
l=lOPsi ngi
aFT (1- OPL
OPHm
Ym Ow m (1- oPL 1 oP,;
oHm apsi )
+ f Ow j l(l- oPL 1)
YJ Ym OR -A. m OP. nee
Ow m l(l- ap.
OPL 1)op'Hj =0 ..•••(3.132)
1=5+1
J"m Hj
OR
lim lim
rin
lim
g.n
Note that Opsi and OpHj are the variations in powers at steam and hydro plants respectively
and hence are finite. Then, to make the equation (3.128) satisfied, each of the coefficients of
the variations must be zero.
and Yj
Ow, ( _ aPL
oP II 1 Ow m (
OR ) - Ym - - 1 - - - =0
0It) ..... (3.134)
Hi lim OPHm 0I\un
In other words,
OF
_T
oW m
Owi
ap OP aPHj
(1- ~PJ) = Ym (ll _ ;PL 1) = Yj (ll _ OPL 1)
l op.. OPHj oPHj
= constant ..... (3.135)
The partial derivatives in the above equation are also the total derivatives. It may also be
recognized that each of the term in the eq. 3.13 5 is also the incremental cost of the received
. .... (3.136)
ww r -)
Ow (
) apH,j
l-j
1-~
=A.
1 ')
Also w.E
asy ..... (3.137)
Let
dF·
_1
dPsi
= a. P . + b.
1 s1
r ing . .... (3.138)
.
1
and
dWj
-dP = c· PH· + d.
Hj J J J
net
..... (3.139)
where a and c are the slopes of the incremental cost curves and b and d are the intercepts.
..... (3.142)
Rewriting the third term on the left side of both the above equations, as
S
L Bki P k = BIZ',PSI' + ..... (3.143)
K=1 S
n n
and L BjkI1Ik =B. Ph' + L BkiP k ..... (3.144)
K=s+1 1) ~ K=s+1 s .
K~j
ww
w.E ..... (3.145)
and a syE
ngi
d) n s
l-"i - L 2B)kPHk - L 2B)IPsl
k=s+1 1=1
..... (3.146)
nee
These two equations (3.145) and (3,146) can be solved iteratively till convergence is obtained
assuming suitable values for A. and Yj .
rin
E 3.7 The input - output data for a particular hydro - plant is given in Fig. E 3.7.1. Find the
incremental water rate characteristic and convert it into an equivalent incremental g.n
production cost characteristic taking the cost of water as 1Q-3Rs.lm3.
et
r--
""'
'"
1600
1400
1200
'"'e- ' 1000
800
~
.c 600
~ 400
i5
~
200
Solution: The incremental water rate is obtained by finding the slope of the given input -
output curve at different points. A straight line segment approximation of incremental water
rate is obtained as in Fig. E 3.7.2.
4.0
I
~
3.5
3.0
:::E
----
...,rIl
2.5
5 2.0
c:G
ww ~ 1.5
I
1.0
~ Q.I
w.E
"0"0
0.5
-l--+--I--+----l'---+-4--L..+--I---- M W
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
a
Incremental water rate
syE
P ---.
Fig. 3.7.2 Incremental Water rate
ngi
1.7m3/s/MW for P = 0 to 563 MW
for P
(0.0233P - 11.4) m3/s/MW
563 to 640 MW nee
Incremental production cost
rin
Incremental water rate
1.7 x 3600 x 10-3 Rs.IMWh
x
g.n
cost of water
Loads:
L1 160 MW
L2 35 MW
L3 72.5 MW
Total Load = 267.5 MW
Base Voltage = 220kV
Base MVA = 100
The B - coefficient matrix is given as
ww B = G 1 [0.0210
G1 G2
0.0034
G3
0181
1
w.E G2 0.0034 0.02497 0.0.003
GI - asy
Characteristics of steam and hydro plants
thermal station :
En
Calorific value of coal 5125 kcal/kg
Cost of coal
gi
Incremental fuel cost at near no - load
Incremental fuel cost at 40MW nee
Rs.45 per ton
Rs.21/MWh
Rs.23/MWh
Slope of incremental cost curve
rin
0.05
Intercept on y-axis 21
g.n
260
260 et
240 236 230
215
220
1
~
200
178
187
~ 180
o 6 12 16 20 22 24
Time (h) ----.
Fig. E 3.8 Load Curve
G2 - thermal station :
Calorific value of coal 4600 kcallkg
Cost of coal Rs.48 per ton
Incremental fuel cost at near no - load Rs.25/MWh
Incremental fuel cost at 40MW Rs.31.6/MWh
Slope of incremental cost curve 0.094
Intercept on y-axis 21
dF2
- = 0.094PS2 + 21
dP 2
ww
G 3 - Hydro electric plant
Assuming Y3 = 1.0 paise/IOO m3 of water at 104 MW output, the incremental plant
w
cost = Rs.19.5 per MW h and at 120 MW output the incremental plant cost = Rs.36
.Ea
per MWh. Slope of the incremental cost curve
Intercept on y-axis
y
= -
-16
88
syE
= 16.5 =1.03
Y1
dW
=--'l ngi
= 19.5;0 $ PH3 $104MW
- dP H3
= 1.03PH3 - 88; nee
104 $ PH3 $120MW
r ing
The system daily load curve is given in Fig. E 3.8 as shown. Obtain the economic
schedules.
Solution: . net
The scheduling equations are given from eqs. (6. 102) and (6.103) as
1-~-0.000068P2 -0.000362P
PI = ___A~___________________3
0.05 + 0.00042
A
21
1-- - 0.000068 PI - 0.000060 P3
A
P2=--~--------------------
-
0.094 + 0.0004994
A
88
I + - - 0.000362 PI - 0.000060 P2
P3 = A
1.03 + 0.00 I 0
A
in order to schedule for a specified received load, the values of I are computed from
equation as
+ (p(d)
1.(1-1) 1.(1-2) 1
1.(1) = 1.(1-1)
R
_ p(I-I)
R
ww AI = 22.0
a dW 1
Y3 dP'
syE
3
= 0.515P3 -44atY3 =0.5paiseIl00m
nee
= 0.824P3 - 70.4 at Y3 = 0.8 paise / 100 m
= 0.927P3 -79.2atY3 = 0.9paisell00m
rin
= 1.03P3
= 1.24P3
-
-
88 at Y3 = 1.0 paise / 100 m
105.5 at Y3 = 1.2 paise /I 00 m g .ne
the results of the economic schedule are shown in tables E 3.8 (a) to E 3.8 (g)
corresponding to different water rates.
Table E 3.8 (a)
t
Y = 0.5 PslI 00m 3
p(d) P2 PR A
R PI P3 Ptotal Ploss
(MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW)
178.000 342786 28.1089 125.870 188.168 102033 177.965 242133
187.000 37.5000 33.4225 126.731 197.674 10.6672 187.006 24.8071
215.000 37.5000 58.5480 131.085 227.133 12.1321 215.001 27.5978
230.000 37.5000 72.1076 133.447 243.055 13.0705 229.984 29.1365
\
ww
236.000
260.000
37.5000
37.5000
83.7402
106.168
127.517
130.888
248.758
274.556
12.7620
14.5569
235.996
259.999
30.4564
33.0778
ngi
(MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW)
178.000 37.5000 34.7763 114.802 187.080 9.07387 172.006 24.9369
187.000
215.000
37.5000
37.5000
43.1259
69.3002
115.827
119.072
196.453
225.872 nee
9.44968
10.8717
187.003
215.000
25.8570
28.7397
230.000
236.000
37.5000
37.5000
83.4432
89.1077
120.848
121.564
241-791
248.171
r
11.7948
12.1942 ing
229.997
235.977
30.4096
31.0668
260.000 37.5000 112.001 124.484 I 273.985 13.9878 259.998
. 33.7546
net
Table E 3.8 (d)
y = 0.8 Psll 00m 3
p(d) P2 P3 PR A.
R PI Ptolal Ploss
(MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) (MW)
ww 236.000
260.000
37.5000
37.5000
95.0556
118.416
115.078
117.513
247.634
273.429
11.6339
13.4335
236.000
259.996
31.7422
34.5033
(MW)
p(d)
R PI
(MW)
P2
(MW)E P3
(MW)
ngi
Ptotal
(MW)
Ploss
(MW)
PR
(MW)
A.
178.000
187.000
37.5000
35.3000
41.5314
50.1235
107232
109.682
186.314
195.682 nee
8.31038
8.68070
178.004
187.002
25.666
262182
215.000 37.5000 77.0672 110.525 225.048
rin
10.0942 214.998 29.6583
g.n
230.000 35.3000 91.6397 111.878 241.018 11.0182 230.000 31.3386
236.000 37.5000 97.4943 112.426 247.421 11.4210 236.000 32.0212
260.000 37.5000 121.065 114.658 273221
Where F and P are fuel in put in K-cal/hr and unit output in MW respectively. The daily
load cycle is given as follows.
Time Load
12 midnight 6 am 50MW
ww 6 am to 6 pm 150MW
asy
Give the economic schedule for the three periods of the day
Solution:
E
Let the cost of the fuel be the same at both the plants.
dF
ngi
_I = (7 + 0.06PI )10 6 K-cal/MWhr
dPI
If C is cost of fuel in Rs/K-cal. nee
The incremental production cost at plant 1
rin
dC I 6
=-=(7+0.06PI )10 xC Rs per MWhr
dPI g.n
similarly
dC 2
=-
dP 2
6
= (5 + 0.IP 2 )10 xC Rs per MWhr
et
For economy
dP I dP 2
and P I +P 2 = 50 MW (i)
(7 + 0.06 PI) \06 xC = (5 + 0.1 P2 )106 xC (ii)
solving (i) and (ii) for PI and P2
PI = 18.75 MW
P2 = 31.25 MW
For PI + P2 = 150MW
E3.10 The incremental production cost data of two plants are dFI = 2 + PI and dF2 = 1.5 + P2
dPI dP2
ww where PI and P2 are expressed in per unit on I OOMVA base. Assume that both the units
are in operation and that the maximum loading of each unit is I OOMW and the minimum
w loading of each unit is 10MW. The loss coefficients on a 100MVA base are given by
syE
- 0.05 0.2
for A = 2.5 solve the coordination equations, by the iterative method.
Solution:
ngi
[PC I = a I PI + b I
nee
I-~
A -28 21 P2
a
2
r ing
I - - - 2 x (-0.05) x p,
2.5
I
-
l
-+28
A
11
- + 2x (0.10)
2.5
. net
1-0.8+0.1P2 = 0.2 =0.333 at P, =0
0.4 + 0.2 0.6 -
I- ~- 2 x (-0.05) X P,
1-0.6+0.1PI
2.5 -
I 0.4 + 0.4
- + 2x(0.02)
2.5
At PI = 0.333,
w.E Iteration
I
PI
0.333
P2
0.541625
asy 2
3
0.4236
0.42546
0.55295
0.55318
Solution:
For economy
I - -bl - 28 21 P2 I -- ~- 0
A. 30
PI::: a ::: 003 ::: 177.78MW
1
-+28 _ .-+2xO.001
11
A. 30
2 b 10
1- --
A. - 28 12 P1 1- ---
P2 -.lQ
ww
::: = = 500MW
a2 0.04
-+28 22
A. 30
w.E
The transmission losses are
asyL PL =
2
i=1
2
LP,8,lJ
J=1
E ngi
nee
rin
E3.12 Consider a steam station with two units the input - output characteristics being specified
by
g.n
F2 = 120 + 6P 2 + 0.04 pi
In scheduling a load of 1OOMW by equal incremental cost method, the incremental cost
et
of unit 1 is specified wrongly by 10% more than the true value while that of unit 2 is
specified by 6% less than the true value
Find (i) The change in generation schedules and
(ii) The change in the total cost of generation.
Solution:
The incremental production cost at plant I is 8 + 0.048 PI
It is specified 10% more.
That is (8 + 0.048 PI) 1.1 = 8.8 + 0.0528 Pl.
The incremental production cost at plant 2 is 6 + 0.08 P2
\
It is specified 6% les
That is as (6 + 0.08P 2) 0.94 = 5.64 + 0.0752 P2
Schedule with correct incremental production costs:
8 + 0.048 PI = 6 + 0.08P 2
PI + P2 = 100MW
Solving PI = 46.875MW
P2 = 53.125 MW
Cost of production at plant I
ww C I = 80 + 8
Case of production at plant 2
x 46.875 + 0.024 x 46.875 2 = 507.73438
asy
Schedule with incorrect specification:
8.8 + 0.0528P I = 5.64 + 0.752P 2
En PI + P2 = 100
Solving
gi
PI = 34.0625
P2 = 65.9375 nee
Cost of production at plant 2
r ing
C:
Cost of production plant 1
=80 + 8 x 34.0625 + 0.024 x 34.0625 2 = 380.34609
. net
C~ 2
= 120 + 6 x 65.9375 + 6.04 x 65.9375 = 569.53528
Total cost CI = C: +C~ = 949.88218
Change in total cost of generation
= 1029.375 - 949.8821=109.49
E3.t3 A two bus system shown in figure supplies a load at bus 2. If 50MW is transmitted
from plant I to load at bus 2 overthe line, the loss is 2.5MW. The incremental production
costs at both the plants are given with usual notation by
dC)
- = 0.03P) + IS and
dP)
dC 2 = 0.05P + 20
dP2 2
2
Line
ww Plant 1 Plant 2
Solution:
asy
En
The load is at bus 2 only. There is transmission loss only from the power supplied by plant I.
No power is transmitted over the line from plant 2.
Hence, gi nee
B = 2.5 =O.OOI(MW)-1 r ing
Case (i)
II
Losser coordinated
SOx 50
dC I + A. dPL = A.
. net
dPI dPI
dC 2 + A. dP L = A.
dP2 dP 2
0.03P I + 15 + 2 x O.OOIP I = 23
PI = 258.06MW
0.05 P2 + 20 + 0 = 23
P2 = 3/0.05 = 60MW
Total generation = PI + P2 = 318.06MW
Total load demand = PI + P2 - PLOSS
= 318.06 - 0.001 x 258.06 2 = 60.595MW
Po = 318.06 - 66.595 = 251.465MW
Case (ii) Economic Schedule for PD=251.465MW with losses not coordinated.
0.03P I + 15 = 0.05P 2 + 20 (i)
0.05 P2 = 0.03 PI + 15 - 20
w.E
Solving PI = 262.88 (valid answer)
Then, P2 = 157.728 - 100 = 57.728MW
asy
Total generation PI + P2 = 320.608MW
The savings at plant 1 due to loss coordination.
J En m~
2
(0.03P I + 15)dPI == 0.03P1 + 15PI I
m~
==
gi
25806
nee
[69105.9 - 66594.9] == 2511.0 Rs / Hr
25806
.
2 =
60
-
dC I == 0.005P + 5 an d
I
dPI
dC 2 = 0.004P J + 7
dP 2 -
B == [0.0002 - 0.00005]
- 0.00005 0.0003
Determine the penalty factors at both the buses and also the approximate penalty factors.
Given A. == 8
Line
Fig. E 3.14
ww
Solution:
asy
En
giaP L
-==2P
ap 2 B 22 +2P I B 21 =2
2
nee
0.0003P 2 +2xO.00005P I
r
(0.005 PI + 5) + 8 (0.0004 PI + 0.0001 P2) == 8
(0.004 P2 + 6) + 8 (0.0006 P2 + 0.0001 PI) ing
== 8
Simplifying
0.005 PI + 0.0032 PI + 0.0008 P2 = 3
. net
0.004 PI + 0.0048 PI + 0.0008 P2 = 2
(i.e.) 0.0082 PI + 0.0008 P2 == 3
0.0008 PI + 0.0088 P2 == 2
Solving for PI and P2
PI == 346.75 and P2 == 195.75
( ap)
J
1+ aP L == I + 0.1387 + 0.019575 == 1.158275
ww
At plant 2 the approximate penalty factor ==
w.E J (
1+ aP L == 1+ 0.11745 + 0.034675 == 1.152125
ap2
asy
E3.15 Given the network in the figure shown along with the currents flowing in the lines and
the impedances of the lines in per unit on a 100MVA base. Compute the B. coefficients
En
for the network when the voltage at bus 1 is 1.0 LO o p.u.
gi
GEN I
nee
GEN2
rin
---.--'-+-- 3
g.n
et
4
Solution:
GEN I GEN2
1
ww
w.E 2 --'---r'-- 4
En
The current distribution factors
gidal == 1
d
bl
== 2 - jO.2
4.5 - jO.7
== 0.44135
nee
rin
del
== 2 - jO.2
4.5 - jO.7
== 0.44135
g.n
GEN I GEN2 et
Open
da2 = 0
= 2 - jO.2 = 0.44135
d b2 4.5 - jO.7
w.E
Voltages at bus 4 V 4 = (1.051 + jO.125) - (0.0 I + jO.05) (2 - jO.2) =
1.03 + jO.027 = 1.03035 L 1.500
asy
0 1 = Tan -I ( - 0.3) = _11.3 0
E
2 -I( - n
1.5
~.4) = -7.595 u
O = Tan
Cos (d l
gi - nee
d 2) = [- 11.3° - (-7.595 0 )] = Cos (-3.705 0 ) = 0.9979
Power factor at plant I (COS~I) = Cos (0 + 11.3°) = 0.9806
0
rin
Power factor at plant 2 (COS~2) = Cos (6.78257 + 7.595) = 0.96868
g.n
= 2 I
2
2 =[lxO.01+0.44135 xO.01+0.44135 xO.01]
2
et
I x 0.9806
= 0.01445
(1.036571)2 X (0.96868)2
= 0.0044778857
on 100 MVA base the loss coefficients are
w B22 = 0.0046429
.Ea
x
syE
ngi
nee
r ing
. net
Questions
3.9
determined.
Discuss the general problem of economic operation of large inter connected areas.
et
3.10 State what is meant by base - load and peak - load stations. Discuss the combined
operation of hydro electric and steam power stations.
3.11 Derive an expression for the hourly loss in economy due to error in the representation of
input data.
3.12 What are the assumptions made in deriving transmission loss coefficients? Enumerate
them.
3.13 Explain hydro thermal economic load scheduling. Derive the necessary equations.
Problems
"
P3.1 (a) A power system consists of two, 120 MW units whose input cost data are
represented by the equations:
C, = 0.04 P? = + 22 P, + 800 Rupees / hour
C2 = 0.04 p22 = + 22 P2 + 1000 Rupees / hour
If the total received power PR = 200MW Determine the load sharing between
units for most economic operation.
(b) Discuss the general problem of economic operation oflarge interconnected areas.
P 3.2 (a) Derive an expression for the hourly loss in economy due to error in the
ww (b)
representation of input data.
The incremental fuel costs for two plants are given by
w.E dc
- ' = O.lP, + 20Rs./ Mw - Hr
dP,
dC 2
-
dP 2
= 0.15P 2 + 22.5Rs./ Mw - Hr
asy
The system is operating at the optimum condition with P, = P2 = 100MW and
q"
ap2 En
= 0.2
P 3.3 (a)
gi
Find the penalty factor at plant I and the incremental cost of received power.
nee
The incremental fuel costs for the two plants are given by
dc,
-
dP,
= 0.2P, + 45
dc,
rin
- - = 0.25P, + 34
dP2 -
g.n
where C is in Rs/hr and P is in MW. If both units operate at all times and
et
maximum and minimum loads on each are 100MW and 20MW respectively.
determine the economic load schedule of the plants for the loads of 80MW and
180MW Neglect the line losses.
(b) write short notes on physical interpretation of co ordination equation.
P 3.4 (a) Derive the conditions to be satisfied for economic operation of a loss less power
system.
(b) 150 MW, 220MW and 220MW are the ratings of three units located in a thermal
power station. Their respective incremental costs are given by the following
equations:
P 3.5 The equations of the input costs of three power plants operating in conjunction and
supply power to a system network are obtained as follows:
C I = 0.06 + 15P I + ISO Rupees I hour
C2 = 0.08 + 13P2 + 180 Rupees I hour
C3 = 0.10 + IOP 3 + 200 Rupees I hour
The incremental loss - rates of the network with respect to the plants 1,2 and 3 are
0.06, 0.09 and 1.0 per MW of generation, respectively. Determine the most economical
share of a total load of 120MW which each of the plants would take up for minimum
input cost of received power is Rupees per MWH.
ww
P 3.6 (a) The incremental costs for two generating plants are
IC I =0.1 PI + 20 Rupees/MW hour
w.E
IC 2 =0.1 P2 + 15 Rupees/MW hour
Where PI and P2 are in MW. The loss coefficients (Bmn) expressed in MW-I unit
are
a syE
BII = 0.001. B22 = 0.0024, BI2 = N21 = -0.0005. Compute the economical
ngi
generation scheduling corresponding to the Lagrangian multiplier 1.25 Rs/MW hr
and the corresponding system load that can be met with. If the total load is
nee
150MW, taking 5% change in the value of I, what should be the value of I in the
next iteration?
(b)
rin
What are the assumptions made in deriving the loss coefficients? "\ ""'\
P 3.8 A constant load of 300MW is supplied by two 200MW generators. , and 2 for which
the respective incremental fuel costs are
P 3.9 A system consists of two plants connected by a tie line and a load is located at plant 2.
When IOOMW are transmitted from plant I, a loss of IOMW takes place on the tie -
line. Determine the generation schedule at both the plants and the power received by the
load when I for the system is RS.25 per megawatt hour and the incremental fuel costs
are given by the equations:
dF dF
- ' = O.03P1 + 17Rs I MWr --2-=O.06P2 +19Rs/MWr
dP, dP 2
P3.10 The incremental fuel cost curves of generators A and B are shown below in the figure.
How would a load (i) more than 2 PG (ii) less than 2PG and (iii) equal to 2PG be shared
w.E I.e
as rI
:
· I
i
I
:
Gen. 8
Gen. A
yE
I I
ngi
--~----~----~---)~MW
MW
min
MW
nee
max
rin
P3.11 (a)
(b) g.n
Explain heat rate curve and cost curve. Bring out the differences between them
Determine the economic operating point of three units supplying a load of800MW.
The incremental fuel costs of the three units are:
dF
_I
dP,
= 6.48 + O.00256P1Rs. I MWh
dF
_2
dP 2
et
=7.85+0.00388PJRs'/MWh
-
dF
_3 = 7.97 + O.00964P, Rs.I MWh
dP 3 .
w ww LOAD FLOW
4 OPTIMAL
.Ea
syE
Optimal load flow studies are concerned with economic operation of the system in all aspects.
ngi
These aspects include consideration of all constraints while satisfying the load balance. The
various types of inequality constraints have been already discussed in Chapter 3. Satisfying
nee
the load constraints itself is the load flow solution. Hence, in optimal operation, the cost
minimization is implemented in addition to aforcesaid considerations. It may be noted that
ri
even the slack bus voltage also has to be optimized for economy while the choice of slack bus
may be based on other considerations.
ng.
4.1 Reactive Power Control for Loss Minimization
n
Transmission losses are quadratic functions of bus-bar voltage magnitudes at all buses. With
usual notation. et
PLOSS = ± ±Iv, IIY'JIIVJI cos(8, -8J-8,J
,=1 J=1
..... (4.1 )
At each voltage controlled bus the best voltage that minimized the loss is determined.
Consider the bus impedance matrix ZBUS. Let R be the real part of the ZBUS matrix.
At each bus i, the current
P, - jQ, (C ·S· s: )
I, = A, + jB, = IV,I s:
osu, - J IOu, ..... (4.2)
. .... (4.3)
The necessary condition for PLOSS to be a minimum is dP LOss = 0 at all the reactive
dQ
generation buses. A gradient algorithm can be used for iteration
Qnew = QoJd +
, ,
k( ap80,
LOSS )OJd ..... ( 4.4)
ww
4.2
where k is a scalar parameter.
ngi
.Y vector includes Pk and Q k at each P, Q bus k.
At the slack bus 8 k and IV kl are also y-vector components.
nee
It can be recognized that .Y is the control vector and X is the vector of ,lependent
variables.
At every bus the equality constraint h(X) =
rin
0 must be satisfied.
(i.e) Pgl
Qg, -
- P'I - PI = 0
0'1 - 0, = 0 g.n ...... (4.5)
Where the suffix g stands for generation bus and f stands for load bus.
The Lagrange function is formed as :
et
L = f + A' h ..... (4.6)
The necessary conditions for minimum of L are
..... (4.7)
eh
Since X vector contains IVI and 8, eV is the Jacobian matrix of N-R method in load
flow solution.
ww aL
w
cost curves. Ie can be computed. With Ie known -;- is determined using the gradient method.
.Ea
aL
L'y
syE
old
y new = y + k ay where k is a scalar parameter ..... (4.11 )
ngi
The computation is repeated till convergence is obtained. In order to consider the inequality
constraints, they are set and held at their limits, in case they are violated for all control variables
nee
't.. If the dependent variables are violated, then the penalty function method is lIsed to force the
variables back to their limits. It is said that the method offers good convergence in general.
If the functions f, g and h are all linear the optimization of the functional f can be
achieved through linear programming methods. However, if anyone of them is non-linear,
then non-linear programming methods are to be applied. The general conditions for the solution
of non-linear programming problem are given by Kuhn-Tucker conditions.
Forming the composite L - function
..... (4.15)
ww
position) TS (phase shift transformer tap position) together with dependent variables voltage
magnitude IVI and bus voltage phase angle D.
4.4
asy
Lagrange Function for Optimal Load Flow
The general Lagrange function with all the constraints incorporated is written as
L= Ef(K)
+ Ai' hP (K ) + IlQ hQ (X)
ngi
(Scalar cost function for optimal evaluation.)
+ pP gP(K) nee
(equality constraints for load balance)
+
pBgB(K)
pRSgRS~)
(boiler constraints, if any) g. net
(running reserve constraints)
+ pBRgBR~) (branch flow constraints)
+ pVgV~) (bus voltage constraints)
oL _ 0 ._
::l - for I - I, 2, ..... n ..... (4.21 )
('X,
ww
is very difficult to obtain in practice. However, there are several techniques, which are iterative
in nature. that can be applied to find the optimal solution around the operating point. There are
w.E
sequential unconstrained minimization techniques which transform the constrained problem
into an unconstrained problem. Penalty function methods are important in this category. In
the next section a method that utilizes the jacobian of the Newton - Raphson method will be
asy
detailed. In this method neither the penalty functions are used nor the Kuhn - Tucker variables.
No effort will be made to limit the controllable variables initially.
4.6 E
Conditions for Optimal Load Flow
ngi
n
n
Taking into consideration only the equality constraints, the Lagrange function becomes
L Aqgq (x) +
L eer n
L = F(x) +
q=!
in
q=!
Il qg q (x)
g.n
..... ( 4.22)
At the optimum
et ..... (4.23)
considering the voltage phase angle and its magnitude only as variables
Multiplying equations (4.23) by d8 p and equation (4.24) by dlV pi
::IF
::lL
_u d8 p =
08
~d8p
08 p
+" n
L-
q=! 08 p
og
Aq - q oOp +"
n
L-
q=!
oil
r"q - s:
oUp
q o8 p ..... ( 4.25)
and
..... (4.26)
~ aQ gq ~ aQlq ~ oOq
+ + ..:::...Ilq - - d 8 p - ..:::...Ilq --d8 p - ..:::...Ilq --d8 p ..... (4.27)
q~1 oP gP q~1 oPgP q~1 oP gP
ww 0 I VP I I p I
w.E
asy
The load powers are generally assumed to remain constant
Hence,
En oP1q aQ Iq
-=--=--=--=0
ODp o8 p
oP1q aQ Iq
olVpl clVpl
..... (4.28)
gi
Also, the total derivatives for Pgq and Qgq are given by
nee
~ ~ oP gq ~ oP gq
ar
..:::...AqdP gq = ..:::...Aq --d8P + ..:::...Aq - - d I Vp I
q~1
n
q~1
-"
o8P
aQ
q~1
n ing
I Vp I
aQ .....(4.29)
andLllqdO gq =
q~1
Lll
q=1
q ~d8P
ODP
+ Ill
q=1 aq
Hence equation (4.27) reduces to the following with the substitution of (4.28)
. gq
I Vp I
d I
net
Vp I
and (4.29)
..... (4.29)
..... (4.32)
For the above equations to be zero, since, Pgq' Qgq' op and IV pi are finite changes their
ww
coefficients have to be zero.
Hence Yq = Aq ..... (4.33)
asy
at all generating buses
En oPq
Further
gi oop
oPq
81Vp l nee
q = I, 2 .... n P = I, 2, ..... n rin
g.n
..... (4.35)
The above equations are the conditions for optimal load flow.
Algorithm:
1. Any bus is assumed as reference bus I. The incremental production cost at this bus
from any feasible load flow solution is computed and set equal to AI.
IPC I = YI = AI
2. The coefficient matrix (4.35) is expanded and is shown in equation (4.36). Separating
out the first column it has the order reduced as follows; to enable the computation of
all remaining Als and Ills.
wwoPI
olvd
OP2
alv21
oPng
aivil
oPng +1
lYJ
oPn
clv~l
00 1
civIl
OOng
alv,1
aO ng +1
(11 VI I
aQn
chi
•
~ll
=0
apng
olvngl alvngl alvngl alvngl illvngl alvngl
En
aPI OP2 aPng +1 OPn cOl OOng OOng+1 OO n
.. Il n
~Vnl alvnl alvnl alvnl alvnl alvnl alvnl lYJ alvnl J
ap2 aPn CO ng +1
r ing
0° 2
aPn
0° 2
aPn
0° 2
CO ng +1
CO"
DOl
OOn
Al
aPI
.
?PI
2° 2 net
aO n aO n DOn aO n An
aO n
ap2 = (-AI ..... ( 4.37)
oPn OOng+1 OOn ~ng+1 oPI
alVng+11 alvng+d alvng+,1 alVng+11 81 Vng+11
Knowing the right hand side vector the Als and ~I s are computed for all on the left hand side.
The real power generations are computed lIsing these A values for y, the incremental
production cost using the relations.
Yq = k Aq; q = 1,2, ..... ng ..... (4.38)
ng
" P
[ ~ uq
q=i'
+" __batL_1
q=i
ng
~
pq
and K == --'-------;-----::--'--'-'- ..... (4.39)
I[~l
b
q=i q
ww
At the optimum k becomes unity.
From the voltage magnitude derivatives the voltage magnitudes are computed:
oP
-,-,II.I
i 1oP2
avp +-,-,11.2
oVp w.E 1 eP"
+...... +-;1'
eVp-'lI. +-;1-,
1 ?On
n (V p-,l1n +1 +...... +-;1,-,l1n
OO"g+i
eVp 0g ==
a
P == I, 2, ..... ng
syE
The above equations do not appear in (4.37) as they are partitioned out from equn.( 4.36).
..... (4.41)
rin
The influence of () on reactive power can be neglected while scheduling real power.
Voltages IV pi are calculated during every iteration, until convergence is obtained.
g.n
Computation of real power generation and voltages is continued till the solution is obtained.
Both Q and IVI are monitored at every iteration and whichever exceeds the limit is set at
that value and the node is treated as P, Q bus and that voltage equation drops from Eqn.(4.42).
If both are violated, load flows are performed till they lie within the limits.
et
E.4.1 For the network shown in Fig. E4.1 the following data is given:
Incremental cost curves
Generating station I
dF
_I == (24 + 8P I )Rs./ p.u.MWh
dFI
Generating station 2
dF)
- - == (19.6 + 8P2 )Rs. / p.u.MWh
dF2
4 3
ww 6
w.E
asy Fig. E4.1
En
The restrictions on real powers at the stations are
0.1
0.1 gi~ PI ~
~ P2 ~
1.0 p.u. MW
1.0 p.u. MW
nee
The load powers are given in Table E4.1.
rin
Bus
Table E4.1
Real Power (p.u. MW) Reactive Power (p.u. MW) g.n
3
4
5
0.55
0.0
0.50
0.05
0.0
0.05
et
6 0.30 0.Q3
Find the most economical generation at stations I and 2. Find also the annual savings,
if both the plants operate for 7000h in an year.
Solution:
Let bus 1 be the slack bus. Its voltage is assumed (I + jO.O). Let the generation at bus 2 be
arbitrarily assigned as
P = 0.80 p.u. MW and Q = 0.05 p.u. MW
Performing load flow computation following the procedure given in chapter 2, the
following results are obtained.
asy I. VI
V2
1 +jO.O
1.04454+ jO.1891O
En
2.
3. V3 0.95948 + jO. 17580
4.
5.
6.
gi V4
V~
Vb
0.90461 +jO.I2718
nee
0.88958 + jO.15143
0.89768 + jO.11 0 1
Table E4.4
Iteration Al Az A3 A4 As A6
1. 3.706 2.679 4.037 4.000 4.000 3.897
2. 3.981 3.546 4.444 4.414 4.494 4.444
3. 3.808 2.918 4.193 4.158 4.186 4.095
4. 3.850 3.099 4.244 4.213 4.252 4.173
5. 3.845 3.099 4.4232 4.201 4.239 4.160
6. 3.835 3.084 4.212 4.181 4.215 4.136
7. 3.833 3.094 4.202 4.172 4.204 4.127
8. 3.828 3.096 4.191 4.161 4.192 4.115
ww 9.
10.
II.
3.824
3.821
3.818
3098
3.100
3.101
4.180
4.171
4.163
4.152
4.143
4.128
4.180
4.170
4.162
4.105
4.095
4.087
w.E
12.
13.
3.815
3.812
3.103
3.104
4.156
4.150
4.135
4.122
4.154
4.146
4.080
4.073
asy
14. 3.810 3.106 4.144 4.116 4.140 4.067
15. 3.808 3.107 4.138 4.111 4.134 4.061
16. 3.804 3.108 4.133 4.106 4.128 4.056
En
Iteration
I.
gi J.l 3
0.0178
Table E4.S
J.l 4
0.0430
neeJ.l s
0.1153
J.l 6
0.1433
r
2. 0.0315 0.0547 0.1189 0.1235
3.
4.
0.0207
0.0202
0.0501
0.0473
0.1244
0.1162 ing 0.1404
0.1292
5.
6.
7.
0.1783
0.0150
0.0126
0.0447
0.0417
0.0390
0.1125
0.1086
0.1047
.
0.1260
0.1230
0.1193
net
8. 0.0104 0.0366 0.1013 0.1163
9.. 0.0084 0.0345 0.0983 0.1137
10. 0.0068 0.0326 0.0956 0.1114
II. 0.0053 0.D31O 0.0933 0.1093
12. 0.0040 0.0295 0.0912 0.1075
13. 0.0027 0.0282 0.0896 0.1058
14. 0.0016 0.0270 0.0876 0.1043
15. 0.0006 0.0260 0.0861 0.1030
16. -0.0003 0.0249 0.0846 0.1017
ww
The savings per hour are Rs. 5564.944 - 5528-232 = Rs.36.71 h-
Annual savings with 7000 working hOllrs is
w.E
The variation of
7000 36.71
Lagrall~\?
= Rs. 258.370
Illultipliers during iterations is shown in Tables E4.4
and E4.5.
asy
En
gi nee
r ing
. net
Questions
4.1 ~ring out the salient features in optimal operation of generators in thermal and
hydro plants.
4.2 Discuss the various constraints to be considered for economic load dispatch
problem.
4.3 What is an optimal power flow? Explain the problem in detail.
4.4 What are Kuhn - Tucker conditions? How are they employed
4.5 Explain how Kuhn - Tucker conditions are useful in optimal load flow.
4.6 Explain the non - linear programming method for optimal power flow
ww 4.7
4.8
Explain reactive power control loss minimization
Explain gradient method for optimal power flow.
w.E
asy
E ngi
nee
rin
g.n
et
Problems
P4.1 Consider the Six bus system shown in Fig. P4.1.
2 3
ww
5
w.E 6
En
The bus admittance matrix is given as follows
14.45 - j32,50
0,0
0,0
0,0
7,33 - j28,25
-1,0+j5,50
gi 0,0
-1,0+ 5.50
1,0-j5,50
- 5,48 + j8. \0
0,0
0,0
nee
- 9,0 + j24,40
-5,05+ j16.30
0,0
0,0
- 1,25 + j6,44
0,0
-5,48+ j8,10 0,0 0,0 10,D3 - j22,70
rin
- 4,55 + j 14,60 0,0
- 9,0 + j24,60
g.n
-5,05+ j16.30 0,0 - 4,55 + j 14,60 18,6- j55,30 0,0
0,0 - 1,28 + j6.44 0,0 0,0 0,0 1.28 - j6,44
dC 2 = 3.25 + P,
dP2 -
dC 3 = 2.75 + P,
dP3 .
w.E
P2 = 1.07780 p.u.
P3 = 1.30267 p.u.
0, = - 0.05844
asy
O2 = - 0.43422
0 3 = 0.2351
En
V, = 1.5 + jO.O
V2 = 1.08667 + jO.67867
gi
V3 = 1.10884 + jO.28434
V4 = 1.02292 - jO.04 75
V s = 1.04923 - jO.00235 nee
V6 = 1.06258 - jO.O 1875
The Lagrange multipliers rin
A, = 4.49644
g.n
1..2 = 4.327741
1..3 = 4.052448
1..4 = 4.724052
et
As = 4.536256
1..6 = 4.489106
Il, = 112 = 113 = 0
114 = 0.018764
Ils= 0.009117
1l6= 0.01 1654
ww
5 UNIT
w.COMMITMENT
Ea
syE
ngi
The life style of a modern man follows regular habits and hence the present society also
follows regularly repeated cycles or pattern in daily life. Therefore, the consumption of electrical
nee
energy also follows a predictable daily, weekly and seasonal pattern. There are periods of high
power consumption as well as low power consumption. It is therefore possible to commit the
rin
generating units from the available capacity into service to meet the demand. The previous
discussions all deal with the computational aspects for allocating load to a plant in the most
g
economical manner. For a given combination of plants the determination of optimal combination
.ne
of plants for operation at anyone time is also desired for carrying out the aforesaid task. The
plant commitment and unit ordering schedules extend the period of optimization from a few
minutes to several hours. From daily schedules weekly patterns can be developed. Likewise,
monthly, seasonal and annual schedules can be prepared taking into consideration the repetitive
nature of the load demand and seasonal variations. Unit commitment schedules are thus required
t
for economically committing the units in plants to service with the time at which individual
units should be taken out from or returned to service.
We may thus define a variable cost coefficient CIJ for ith unit when operating at jth load
for which the corresponding active power is PII. Since the level of operation is a function of
time, the cost coefficient may be described with yet another index to denote the time of
operation, so that it becomes CII ! for the sub interval t corresponding to a power output of PIll"
If each unit is capable of operation at k discrete levels, then the running cost FII of unit
i in the time interval t is given by
~
FII = LCIIIPIiI
1=1
If there are N units available for service in the interval t then the total running cost of
ww
N units during the period t is
N •
asy
For the entire time period of optimization, having T such sub-intervals of time, the
overall running cost for all the units may be put in the form
En FT =
TN.
L L L C 111 Pili
gi I~I I~I J=I
nee
Suppose that for a plant to he brought into service, an additional expenditure CSI has to
be incurred in addition to the running cost, then the start up cost of the unit i, the cost of
r
starting X units during any subinterval t is given by
Fsc ::=
x
L C 'CI<\ ing
where 011 =
I~I
.
I if the ith unit is started in sub-interval t and is zero other wise
In a similar manner, if a plant is taken out of service during scheduling period, the cost
net
of shutting down also must be taken into account. If Y units are to be shutdown during the
sub-interval t, the shutdown cost may be represented by
y
T Y
and FsdT = L L Csdlcrll
1=1 1=1
The total expression for the cost function including funning, start up and shut down
costs will then have the form,
..... (5.1 )
ww
service, the generators to be shut-down and the quantized power loading levels that minimize
the total cost have to be determined.
5.2
w
Constraints for Plant Commitment Schedules
.Ea
As in the optimal point generation scheduling the output of each generator must be within the
minimum and maximum value of loading
pmm
I
<
- syE
p <
1)1-
p max
I
..... (5.2)
where i = 1,2, .... N
ngi
j = 1, 2, ..... k
t = 1,2, ..... T
nee
The total available plant capacity from which schedules are to be prepared must be
r
in excess of the plant generating capacity required in meeting the predicted load demand and
ing
in satisfying the requirements for minimum running reserve capacity during the entire period
of scheduling.
where STAC is the total available capacity in any sub-interval t and Srmm is the minimum
running reserve capacity.
all = 1, if generator i is in operation during the sub-interval t and is zero otherwise.
In addition, for a predicted total load demand PD' the total generation operated in sub-interval
t must be in excess of the load demand by an amount not less than the minimum running
reserve capacity Srmm.
N k
LL Pijl ~ PD +S~m ..... (5.4)
1=1 )=1
Where the transmission losses PL are also considered eqn.(5.4) then becomes
N k
L L--PI) I ~ PD + S~m + PL ...... (5.5)
1=1 )=1
The generator start-up and shut down logic indicators bit and a'l respectively must be
unity during the corresponding sub-intervals of operation, or
a'l - a'(l _ I) = b'l - a'l
i = 1. ..... N
t = I, ..... T
ww
through an example. Consider three thermal plants operating with the following incremental
fuel rate characteristics.
Plant J :
w.E
FI = (7 + 0.003 PI) 10 3 k-cal/Mw-hr.
asy
Plmax = 500 MW and p,mm = 50MW
Plant 2 :
E
F2 = (7.5 + 0.002 P2 ) 103 k-cal/Mw-hr
P2max = 400 MW and Pdnm = 40 MW ngi
Plant 3 :
F3 = (8 + 0.004 P3) 103 k-caI/Mw-hr
nee
P3max = 200 MW and P3mm = 20 MW
rin
The fuel costs at the plants are given by
CP I = I. I Rs/kcal
g. net
CP 2 = 1.05 Rs/kcal
CP 3 = 1.2 Rs/kcal
The full load average production cost at plant I
= 103 (7 + 0.003 x 500) 1.1 = 10 3 (7 + 1.5) 1.1
= 9.35 x 10 3 Rs/MwHr
The full load average production cost at plant 2
= 10 3 (7.5 + 0.002 x 400) 1.05
= 103 (7+0.8) 1.05 = 8.715 x 10 3 Rs/MwHr
The priority list for supplying a load upto 1000 Mw is prepared as follows which is :.clf
explanatory.
Units Max(MW) Min(MW)
ww 2.1 and 3
2,1
1000
900
110
90
w.E 2 400 40
asy
The general procedure can be then staled as .
En
I. Check at the end of every hour of operation. if the load demand has fallen. If the
demand has decreased check if the last unit in the priority list is dropped, the load
gi
demand can be met, satisfying the spinning reserve requirement. Status quo is maintained
if the demand cannot be met.
nee
2. If it is possible to drop the unit in step I, then determine the number of hours '"h" before
r
the unit is required again for service. If this "h" is less than the shut down and start up
times for the unit, it has to be left in service without removal.
ing
.
3. Then, calculate the cost of floating the unit within the system without supplying any
generation and the cost of shut down and start up processes and if there is sufficient
savings from shutting it down, and starting it again for service it can be removed. net
4. The process is to be n:peated for th~ next unit on the priority list and continued.
Consider the route map shown in Fig. 5.1. The values on the routes are the cost of transport
along the route. Let G be the goal to be reached from any of the locations A, 8, C, D, E, F.
Traffic is allowed only along the direction shown on the routes.
E l F
~
p ;/
A
~w
ww
H
"
,/
G
.Ea B 3 2 D
syE
Fig. 5.1 The Routing Problem
It is desired to reach the goal G or destination G from the various locations. The costs
are as indicated.
From D to reach G ngi
CnG = 3 = C~G nee
From H to reach G via D
rin
C~G :::: C HD + C~(j :::: I + 3:::: 4
From C to reach G via D g.n
In a similar manner
C~G =Ceo + C~G =2 + 3 =5 et
C~G = Min[CFG,C FH +C~G]:::: Min[6,1+4]::::5
C~G :::: [C EF + C~G' C EC + C~G]:::: [I + 5,4+ 5] =6 along EFHDG
where CpO is the cost to move from P to Q and C~)R is the optimal cost to move from Q
to R.
ww
applied now
N
L P"
w.E
Let N units in service supply a total load of
(~PI
1=1
asy
The total operating cost for this generation = FN )
En
This cost can be divided into two components as follows:
(i)
gin
The first component is the cost of operating (N-I) Llnits to supply a reduced
demand of N-I
eer
~ P" The operating cost for this generation is FN_1 ~ P,
(N )
(ii)
output of PN is fN(P N)' in
The second component is the cost of operating the Nth unit at an active power
g.n
et
N N-I
The cost of supplying the total load L P, = P + L P,N is given now by
1=1 1=1
Hence
subject to constraints.
Thus, the problem of unit commitment is converted into a multistage decision process.
To start with the solution to the problem, consider the single stage decision process of selecting
one unit that will provide the lowest cost of generation up to the maximum capacity of the unit.
Once such a unit is picked up, the first stage of optimization is completed.
Let the cost of operating this first unit be fl(P I) when supplying PI
FI(P I) = fl(P I)
The optimal combination of this unit with a second unit can be derived next to supply a
load ofP I+P 2 for which the optimal cost is
FZ<P I + P2) = min [fiP2) + FI(P I)]
Since FI(P I) is already the optimal value, the best unit to supply P2 from the rest of
(N-l) units will be picked up during this second stage of optimization for lowest possible cost
of production.
In a similar way, the best 3 unit combination is found from
asy
which is the required solution.
En
gin
eer
ing
. net
E 5.1 Obtain the economic schedule for the two units, the production costs of which are
given as follows, to supply a load of 3MW, in steps of 1MW
CI = 0.8 p~ + 25 PI
C 2 = 1.2 p~ + 22 P2
Use dynamic programming method.
Solution: With usual notation
F I(3) = fP) = 0.8 x 32 + 25 x 3 = 7.2 + 75 = 82.2
F2(3) = min [fiO) + fP), f 2(1) + FP), Fi2) + FI(I), F2(3) + FI(O)]
w.E
The most economical combination is unit 1 supplying I MW and unit 2 supplying 2 MW.
asy
E 5.2 If only a load of 2MW is to be supplied, how are the units to be committed in E5. I.
Solution:
F I(2)
En
= f l (2) = 0.8 x 22 + 25 x 2 = 53.2
Min [ fiO) + F I(2), fiO + FI(I), fi2) + FI(O)]
F2(2)
gi
=
= min [ 53.2, 1.2 + 22 + 0.8 + 25, 1.2 x 4 + 22 x 2 + 0]
= min [ 53.2, 49, 48.8]
nee
F2(2) = fi2) + FI(O). Unit 2 supplies the total load for economy
r
From the above two examples unit commitment schedule may be now prepared based
on the two results. ing
Load range Unit in service
. net
IMW 2
2 MW 2
3MW 2 and 3
For more accuracy the step size can be reduced to 0.5 MW, 0.2Mw or even 0.1 Mw.
The smaller the step, size, the larger the calculations needed.
Questions
ww
w.E Problems
asy
P S.l Write down the recurrence functional relation for scheduling generation among 5
units to meet a load demand of IOMW in steps of 2MW.
E
PS.2 Use dynamic programming method to determine the most economical units to be
ngi
committed to supply a load of 6MW. There are three units with the following data
C 1 = O.8 P1 2 + 22P1
C2 = O.85Pi + 21P2 nee
C3 = O. 8P32 + 20P3
rin
g.n
The maximum and minimum capacities of each unit are 5MW and I MW respectively.
et
PS.3 Use dynamic programming method to determine the most economical units to be
committed to supply a load of 9MW. There are four units with the following data.
The maximum and minimum limits for each unit are 6 MW and I MW respectively.
w.E
asy
E ngi
nee
rin
g.n
et
ww
w.E
asyE CONTROL
6 LOAD FREQUENCY
ngi
nee
In a power system the load demand is continuously changing. In accordance with it the power
rin
input has also to vary. If the input - output balance is not maintained a change in frequency
will occur. The control offrequency is achieved primarily through speed governor mechanism
g.n
aided by supplementary means for precise control. At the outset, the speed governor mechanisms
et
and its operation will be presented.
Governor: The power system is basically dependent upon the synchronous generator
and its satisfactory performance. The important control loops in the system are :
(i) frequency control, and
(ii) automatic voltage co"trol.
In this chapter the frequency control will be discussed. Frequency control is achieved
through generator control mechanism. The governing systems for thermal and hydro generating
plants are different in nature since, the inertia of water that flows into the turbine presents
additional constrains which are not present with steam flow in a thermal plant. However, the
basic principle is still the same; i.e. the speed of the shaft is sensed and compared with a
reference, and the feed back signal is utilized to increase or decrease the power generated by
controlling the inlet valve to turbine of steam or water as the case may be.
6.2 ww
generator unit while in operation.
Speed Governor
w.E
A simple schematic representation of the governor is shown in Fig. 6.1.
a syE t XB
txc
n
--.J gi
B c
J nee
rin
g.n
et
Fig. 6.1 Speed Governor
The pilot valve v operates to increase or decrease the opening of the steam inlet valve V.
Let XB and Xc be the changes in the position of the pilot valve v and control valve V
responding to a change in governor position. XA due to load.
When the pilot valve is closed XB= 0 and Xc == 0, (Le.,) the control valve is not
completely closed, as the unit has to supply its no-load losses. Let roo be the no-load angular
speed of the 9-'rbine. As load is applied, the speed falls and through the linkages the governor
operates to move the piston P downwards along with points A and B. The pilot valve v admits
oil under n and lifts it up so that the input is increased and speed raised. If the link Be is
removed then the pilot valve comes to rest only when the speed returns to its original value. An
"isochronous" characteristic will be obtained with such an arrangement where speed is restored
to its preload-disturbance value. This is shown in Fig. 6.2 and Fig. 6.3.
8 c
ww
w.E
asy
E ngi
Fig. 6.2 Isochronous Governor
nee
IOO%t-==============(A) Isochronous
Speed
t I
Drooping rin (8)
o
g. 50% 100%
net
Power
Fig. 6.3 Governor Characteristics
With the link Be, the steady state is reached at a speed slightly lower than the no load
speed giving a drooping characteristic for the governor system. A finite. value of the steady-
state speed regulation is obtained with this arrangement. For a given speed changer position,
the per unit steady state speed regulation is defined by
N -N
Steady state speed regulation = ~
r
ww
Defining the lever ratios
w.E AB _I
BC - , ..... (6.3)
asy BC _I
AC - 2 ..... (6.4)
and En
AB _I
AC - 3 ..... (6.5)
-, Xc
gi
~_ AB_I
-
BC nee ..... (6.6)
so that XA = I, XC
P
= II -
P,
.C r ing
~N=~=!i.~.C= CII.~
k k P, k P,
. net
..... (6.7)
..... (6.8)
thus, the steady state speed regulation is directly proportional to the output power.
R has the dimension of HzlMW.
When the machine is in operation the no load speed No can be adjusted by varying an
external force acting on the governor thrust sleeve at S so that the characteristic is shifted
parallel to itself as shown by curves C and D. This is achieved by the speed changer.
See Fig. 6.4.
w.E Power
6.5 asy
Transfer Function of Speed Control Mechanism
From Eqn. (6.2).
E
xA = K (N o- N)
ngi
= K I (roo - ro)
rin
g.n ..... (6.10)
A 8 c
et
..... (6.11)
Fig. 6.5
If C were to move with A fixed then from Fig. 6.6.
~_ AS_I
Xc - AC - 3
Xs = 13 , Xc Z
A B c
Fig. 6.6
ww
As the point C will be shifted upwards by Xc due to the load increment, the actual
movement of B would be
.,
w.E xB=12xA-13xc ..... (6.12)
The opening of the pilot valve, xBdetermines the rate of oil flow into the cylinder. The
asy
movement of the control valve, Xc is proportional to the total oil admitted under the piston P.
Therefore,
Xc = k fXB ; En where k is a constant ..... (6.13)
Taking Laplace transform on both sides.
k
Xc (S) = -XB(S)
gi nee ..... (6.14)
s
Taking Laplace transform of Eqn. (6.12),
..... (6.17)
..... (6.18)
..... (6.19)
I
--=Ts
k 13
is the time constant of the speed control mechanism and is of the order of several
milliseconds. The transfer function of the speed control mechanism
G (S) = XC<S) = Ks
..... (6.21 )
sc XA(S) I+STs
ww
Under steady state operating conditions the synchronous angular frequency
w.E ilo =
frequency.
Change in angular position of the generator rotor
E 0= Os + ilo radians
d d ngi d
0) = -(D) = -(os +ilo) = 0)5 +-ilo
. .... (6.22)
..... (6.23)
dt dt
..... (6.24)
Let f = fs + ilf rin ..... (6.25)
Where
I d
M= --iloHz
2n dt
g. net ..... (6.26)
..... (6.30)
1+2M) M
== Ws ( fs for smal fsI ..... (6.31 )
W
Defining per unit inertia constant H = _s
Pr
ww d 2H d
- (W) = -
dt
.
- (M)p.u. takIng Pr = 1.0 pu
fs dt
..... (6.33)
w.E
Further, all types of composite loads experience a change in power consumption with
frequency. Defining the load damping factor.
asy D - oPo
- i\f p.u. MW/Hz ..... (6.34)
E ngi
Where PD is the load demand in p.u.; the change in load demand in this case is
then D. M p.u.M.W
For a small step change in load demand by
written as
~
nee
PD the power balance equation can be
2H d rin
~PG -~Po = DM + - -(M)
fs dt
g.n ..... (6.35)
..... (6.37)
..... (6.38)
..... (6.39)
1
where K = -Hz/p.u.M.W. . .... (6.40)
P D
The transfer function relating the frequency change to the change in input-output power
may be then written as
ww Gp(S)= I+STp
Kp
..... (6.42)
w.E
Fig. (6.7) shows the block schematic of Eqn. (6.39)
asy
En
gi
/ - - - -....... dF(S)
nee
Fig. 6.7
rin
The complete block schematic of speed governing system is shown in Fig. (6.8).
ro
..... (6.43)
x A (S) ks
~(j)(S) = mS + crS + Cs ..... (6.44)
ww
2
w.E
Where Gg(S) is the transfer function of the speed governor.
E ngi
no damping
LO--1
/ I
A'------I
ww o
Temporary droop
mechanism
w.E ~p"otvaJve D
En
The dash pot (temporary droop mechanism) is represented by the transfer function .
gin
e eri
..... (6.47)
ww L
w.E ________ J
H
gin
l\N = change in speed
l\X = change in turbine gate opening
eer
l\Q = change in flow
l\T
It can be proved that, in = change in turbine torque
x
1--
2
e -x = - -
x
1+-
2
Eqn. (6.48) becomes.
l\H
l\Q
= _Te Zs = - T w S ..... (6.49)
w.E
asy
En .. ... (6.52)
gi
For an ideal, loss less turbine with valve opening Xo
all = 0.5 Xo nee
a 21 = 1.5Xo
rin
a 13 = 1.0
~3 = 1.0 g.n
so that
AT
AX
=
1- (1.5X o + O.5Xo)TwS
I+O.5XoTwS
=
1- Xo TwS
1+0.5XoTwS
et
At full load in p.u. Xo= 1.0
Eqn. (6.53), is the classical turbine penstock transfer function. The water starting time,
Tw' varies from 0.5 to 4 s and can be calculated from the relation.
T == LV
w Hg ..... (6.54)
The block diagram in Fig. 6.10 excepting penstock turbine model can be represented by
the linear approximate model shown in figure 6.12 where KG=11k and TI and T2 are given by
ww 1
T ,T
2
Ts
="2± (T2
k
)l
2
w.E .; -TA
and
a syE
1 ngi
T =-
G Ks
nee
Typical values for Tr and 0 can be obtained using the relations
Tr
5Tw = rin
and
0= 2. 5Tw
2H g.n
where H is the inertia constant of the turbine-generator on the machine MVA base. et
change in gate
Reference position
6F(S)
Ka tl+STrJ
(I +STI )(1 + ST 2 )
A complete block diagram for representing the speed - governing system, turbine and
penstock for dynamic studies is shown in Fig. (6.13).
- - - - . . . Steam outlet
ww Steam Vessel
Steam
w.E
Input asy
E ngi
Fig. 6.14 Steam Vessel
nee
Where W is weight of steam in kg and Om and OOlIt are the rate of flow of steam in
kg/sec at inlet and outlet of the steam vessel respectively. Assuming that the flow rate is
proportional to the pressure.
p rin
Where Po and
Oout --0
- P 0
o
g. ..... (6.55)
net
0 0 are the steady state pressure and rate of flow of steam in the vessel.
..... (6.56)
..... (6.57)
d(V) dp
= dp ~ dt
Where V is the volume of the vessel in m3 and v is the specific volume of steam (m 3/kg)
in the vessel.
= V.~(~)dP
dp v dt
= V ~(~). dQout .~
dp v dt Qo
= V ~(~)~.~Qout
dp v Q dt ..... (6.58)
ww T= ~.V~)
o
Let
w.E Qo dp v ..... (6.59)
K TO
G TO (S) = 1 + ST ..... (6.63)
TO
Where KTO is the gain constant and TTG is the time constant of turbine - generator unit.,
ww
w Valve .Ea
syE
Control
Position Valve &
Steam
Stage
Chest
ngi Stage
condenser
Legentd H.P. = High pressure stage turbine
nee
I.P. = Intermediate pressure stage turbine
L.P. = Low pressure stage turbine
r
Fig. 6.15 Tandem Compound Single Reheat System ing
+ +
. net
l+sTCo
If a two stage steam turbine with a reheat unit is considered then the dynamic response
will be influenced by (i) the entrained steam between the steam inlet valve and first stage of
turbine and (ii) the storage action in the reheater which causes the outlet of the L.P. stage to
lag behind that of the H.P. stage.
Inlet valve
ww (a)
Fig. 6.17 Two Stage Reheat Unit
(b)
w.E
The turbine transfer function is characterized by two time constants. For ease of
analysis it can be assumed that the turbine is modeled by a single equivalent time constant. The
asy
value of T T lies between 0.2 to 2.5 sec in most of the cases. This is shown in Fig. 6. I 7(b).
gi
systems are obtained. In practice, rarely a single generator feeds a large area. Several generators
nee
connected in parallel, located also, at different places will supply the power needs of a
geographical area. Quite normally, all these generators may have the same resl'onse characteristics
for changes in load demand.
r ing
In such a case, it is possible to define a control area, grouping all the generators in the area
. net
together and treating them as a single equivalent generator. For small load changes all these
generators swing in unison. Putting together, the various models derived so far a single control
area or simply an area can be conceived as shown in Fig. 6.IS.
From Eqn. (6.20),
Kp
OpeS) = I +STp
1
R
-Ll PD(S)
Xd S)
Ks K TG + Kp
w
6.14 The basics of Load Frequency Control
.Ea
The following basic requirements are to be fulfilled for successful operation of the system:
1.
2. syE
The generation must be adequate to meet all the load demand
The system frequency must be maintained within narrow and rigid limits.
3.
4. ngi
The system voltage profile must be maintained within reasonable limits and
In case of interconnected operation, the tie line power flows must be maintained at
the specified values.
nee
When real power balance between generation and demand is achieved the frequency
r ing
specification is automatically satisfied. Similarly, with a balance between reactive power
generation and demand, voltage profile is also maintained within the prescribed limits. Under
.
steady state conditions, the total real power generation in the system equals the total MW
net
demand plus real power losses. Any difference is immediately indicated by a change in speed
or frequency. Generators are fitted with speed governors which wi II have varying characteristics:
different sensitivities, dead bands response times and droops. They adjust the input to match
the demand within their limits. Any change in local demand within permissible limits is absorbed
by generators in the system in a random fashion.
An independent aim of the automatic generation control is to reschedule the generation
changes to preselected machines in the system after the governors have accommodated the
load change in a random manner. Thus, additional or supplementary regulation devices are
needed along with governors for proper regulation.
The control of generation in this manner is termed load-frequency control. For
interconnected operation, the last of the four requirements mentioned earlier is fulfilled by
deriving an error signal from the deviations in the specified tie-line power flows to the neighboring
utilities and adding this signal to the control signal of the load-frequency control system. This
last requirement will be discllssed in detail in the next chapter.
Should the generation be not adequate to balance the load demand, it is imperative that
one of the following alternatives be considered for keeping the system in operating condition:
I. Starting fast peaking units.
2. Load shedding for unimportant loads, and
3. Generation rescheduling.
It is apparent from the above that since the voltage specifications are not stringent. load
frequency control is by far the most important in power system control. The block schematic
for such a control is shown. in Fig. 6.19.
ww
w.E 2
asy
En
gi nee
Actual output Sensor
rin
Fig. 6.19 Block diagram for load frequency control
g.n
In order to understand the mechanism of frequency control, consider a small step-
increase in load. The initial distribution of the load increment is determined by the system
impedance; and the instantaneous relative generator rotor positions. The energy required to
supply the load increment is drawn from the kinetic energy of the rotating machines. As a
result, the system frequency drops. The distribution of load during this period among the
et
various machines is determined by the intertias of the rotors of the generators partaking in the
process. This problem is studied in stability analysis of the system.
After the speed or frequency fall due to reduction in stored energy in the rotors has
taken place, the drop is sensed by the governors and they divide the load increment between
the machines as determined by the droops of the respective governor characteristics.
Subsequently, secondary control restores the system frequency to its normal value by
readjusting the governor characteristics.
the frequency should be between 5 and 10 % of the entire generating capacity of the system
for effective frequency control. In small, independent systems, old and inefficient machines
may be assigned to frequency regulation leaving new and efficient machines to supply the load
demand.
Modern power systems are so large that it is impossible to design a single central control
system that would handle the overall control job. It is extremely useful to take into account the
weak links in the system and then apply control through decomposition. The demarcation of
load frequency control and Mvar voltage control characteristics is one such decomposition.
Geographical and functional decomposition are successfully applied to power systems and this
leads to the concept of area control. A modern power system can be divided into several areas
ww
for load frequency control. Each control area fulfils the following:
I. The area is a geographically contiguous portion of a large inter- connected area,
w.E
which adjusts its own generation to accommodate load changes within its precincts.
2. Under normal conditions of operation, it exchanges bulk power with neighbouring
areas.
asy
3. Under abnormal conditions of operation, it may deviate from pre- determined schedules
and provide assistance to any neighbouring control area in the system.
En
4. It is expected, in addition, to partake with the other areas in the system in a suitable
gi
manner in the system frequency regulation.
nee
The rotors of all generators in a control area swing together for load changes. Thus, a
coherent group of generators within a geographical region may constitute a control area which
rin
is connected to other similar areas by weak tie lines as shown in Fig. 6.20.
Inter tie with
area I
g.n
Inter tie with
area 3 et
Inter tie with
area n
changes by an amount ~p G following the load change due to governor action, the power
imbalance is ~p G - ~p D' There are three possible modes in which this power can be absorbed.
For positive power imbalance:
1. The area kinetic energy increases (i.e. the kinetic energy of all the generator rotors in
the area increases),
2. The load demand increases (due to load characteristics) and
3. The power out-flow from the area to other interconnected areas increases, if such
interconnections exist.
ww
Under steady state operating conditions. Transfer functions for a single control area can be
derived exactly in the same way as for the system in sec. (6.6).
asy
If ~() is the change in angular position of the equivalent generator representing the area
corresponding to an increased load ~PD in the area.
Then,
E 0 = Os + ~o rad
d d
C=-(o)=-(L +CL)=C s + - ngi
. d~o
dt dt s
IDs + ~ID
=
. dt
nee ..... (6.64)
Let f =fs+M
rin
Where
I d
M= - -
27t dt
~oHz
g.n ..... (6.65)
Thus, W ~ Ws (~ J MJ
r:::.
( M)
fs
for small -M
Ws I + 2 -
fs
..... (6.66)
The rate of change of kinetic energy is the increase in area power which is
All types of composite loads experience a change in power consumption with frequency.
ww
Defining the load damping factor D.
_ oPD
8f" p.u. MW/HZ
w.E 0- ..... (6.67)
Where PD is the load demand in p.u; the increase in load demand in this case is then
asy
D.6f p.u. MW, For a small step change in load demand, 6f p.u. MW. For a small step change
in load demand, 6P D the power balance equation takes the form.
En .. ... (6.68)
gin
eer
Taking the Laplace transform of the above equation
..... (6.69)
The transfer function relating the frequency change to the change in input/output powers
may be designed by Gp(S) so that
Kp
Gp(S) = ..... (6.70)
I +STp
The block schematic for a single area system is shown in Fig. 6.21 (a) An entire control
area may be represented as in Fig. 6.21(b).
~PD(S)
w.E
asy 1--"--+ ~F(s)
Governing
En
EqUivalent turbme ~P o(s) PO\\ier
gi
system generator system
(b)
nee
Fig. 6.21(a, b) Block diagram of a single area system
.
the following equations can be written
[L\P o(S) - L\PG(S)] Gp(S)
I _ L\P (S)
= L\ F(S)
net
RG ST (S)L\F(S) - G
L\P
For a step load change, L\Po(S) = __ 0
S
Substituting the value of L\PoCS)
Applying the final value theorem, the steady state error Mss would be
Lim ~ ] M'o
~fss = S~O LSM'(S) = - D K K
+ TG S
R
ww The product KrG Ks can be made unity by properly selecting the units for the input-
output quantities to the combined block G ST(S) so that
w.E ~fss
-~p
= _ _0_
asy D+-
1
R
E
The quantity (D + llR) is defined as area frequency response characteristic or area
ngi
frequency regulation characteristic (AFRC) and denoted by ~. It may be noticed that as R
becomes smaller ~ fss approaches zero.
We obtain g.
the starting point of the governor characteristic. Under static conditions setting KsKrG = 1.
net
Changing the reference power setting will also change the turbine generator output in a
proportional manner. For instance if the machine connected to an infinite bus in which case
M = 0 we have the direct relationship.
M'ref= M'TG
For a fixed setting of the speed changer the steady state increase in power output
from the turbine generator M'TG is directly proportional to the frequency drop. As in this
case M'ref = 0
1
M' =- -~f
TG R
R has the units hertz per MW or hertz pr unit MW as the case may be.
106
20 40 60 80 100 120
If 0
w.E
0, then AFRC
Fig. 6.22 Speed Changer Setting
asy
= =
The time constants Ts and T T are much smaIler compared to T p and as such,
En
an approximate solution to the response of the system could be obtained by neglecting
them. Then
gi
~F(S) =
1+(
Gp(S)
~)Gp(S)
~PD
S nee
Kp
I +STp ~PD
r ing
1+(~)I+K;Tp S . net
Where A = Kp + R
B =Tp R
Partial fractions for the expression in the bracket can be obtained as follows:
C 0
. =-+---
S A + BS S A + BS
I
At S = O·, C = -A
A B
And at S=-_· 0=--
B' A
So that
M(t) == VI [~F(S)]
-~PDP [2. - I
KpP JI
ww S S+
Tp
asy
The response is shown in Fig. 6.23.
E L\f( Hz)
""T"+------------.--.. ngi
nee
F(s)
L\PD (Hz)
J3
rin
g.n
Fig. 6.23 Uncontrolled single area system-response to step load change
~F(S)==- I G
p
~PD(S)
l+-G s G TG G p
R
~F(S) = _ Gp k
I+~G S
R p
ww (
Kp )
=- I+STp ( I Kp
1+----'--
I
)S k
w.E
Applying partial fractions
R 1+ STp
asy
E ngi
(-~ -~-"-ll
S[S + Tp + RTp
Kpk
---
nee
6.20 Control Strategy
rin
The uncontrolled system is subject to a steady state error for step load changes. To reduce
this error, consider first the introduction of a negative feedback signal from the frequency
deviation, i.e.
g. net
Let ~Pc = -K) ~ F(S) .... (6.72)
where K) is the gain for the proportional control.
The response would then be
..... (6.73)
M = -Kp ~P =_ ~PD
ss I( K+- I)
R)
0 I (I
-- + -- + K
Kp R I
) ..... (6.74)
If K] is made very large then only ~fss reduces to zero. This, in other words, means that
R should be made equal to zero, which is not desirable. Proportional control is not suitable for
reducing the steady state error to zero.
It is a well known fact in control theory that integral control will improve the steady
state performance.
ww The negative sign signifies that the control signal ~ Pc has to be increased for reduction
in frequency. The equations for the system in Fig. 6.24 are:
w.E L\F(s)
asy
En
gi nee
r
L\F(s)
( &+lfR)~F(S)(
S
I )( 1
l+STs I+STTG
J=~PG ..... (6.78)
for a step load change ~PD(S) = - ~PDfS, and the steady state error obtained as
Lim ]
~fss == [S.~F(S)
S~O
By making use of integral control strategy, the steady state error can be eliminated.
For the reasons explained before, TT and T s cam be neglected for an approximate
analysis for the response. For a step load disturbance.
F(S) =
S(~pp ) . -~PD
..... (6.80)
ww S 2 + S(I +Kp)
- -I +K2Kp
R Tp
--
Tp
S
w.E
The response ~f(t) depends on the nature of the denominator expression, i.e. the
characteristic equation.
a S2 + 2 80J n S + OJ n2
sJ yE
Where OJ =
n Tp
ngi
K 2 K P is the natural frequency
and il =
1+~
R J Tp nee
=damping ratio
2Tp K2Kp
rin
g.n
The gain for critical damping can be obtained by setting 8 equal to unity.
et
or . .... (6.81)
For values of K2 greater than that given by eqn. (6.81), the response is oscillatory due to
under damping. For values ofK2 less then the critical value response is monotonically decreasing
without oscillations or as in Fig. 6.25.
The selection of the gain for the controller should be such that the following specifications
are satisfied.
w.E
1. The control loop must be stable.
2. The frequency error should return to zero following a step load change. The deviation
asy
in the transient state must also be minimized.
3. The integral of the frequency error should not exceed a certain value (say 150Hz or
3 seconds)
En
6.21 PID Controllers
gin
eer
From the above analysis, it is clear that proportional integral and derivative control strategy can
be applied for load frequency control. While proportional control is inherent in the feedback
i ng.
through the governor mechanism itself, derivative control when introduced improves transient
performance and ensures better margin of stability for the system.
n et
where K3 is the gain of derivative controller.
The response to such a control is
By proper choice of K J' K~ and K3 all the specifications for the system performance can
be satisfied.
E 6.1 A \00 MW generator has a regulation parameter R of 5%. By how much will the
turbine power increase if the frequency drops by 0.1 Hz with the reference unchanged.
Solution:
Actual change in frequency = 5% of 50Hz = 0.05 x 50 = 2.5Hz
R = 2.5Hzl100Mw = 0.025 HzlMw
If M = -0.1 Hz, the increase in turbine power
I I
~P= -- M= ---x(-O.I) =4 MW
2 0.025
E 6.2 A 100 MW generator with R = 0.02 HzlMW has its frequency fallen by 0.1 Hz. If the
w.E
turbine power remains unchanged by how much the reference power setting be changed.
Solution:
asy
The signal to increase the generation is blocked. Thus at the input summing point the reference
En
power setting must be changed. Such that
~ Pref ~R
gi -
I
M= 0
1 nee
(i.e .. ) ~ Pref - R M= 0.025 xO.l = 4 Mw
r ing
E 6.3 Two generators with ratings 100 MW and 300 MW operate at 50Hz frequency. The
. net
-s.ystem load increases by 100 MW when both the generators are operating at about half
of their capacity. The frequency then falls to 49.5Hz.
If the generators are to share the increased load in proportion to their ratings
what should be the individual regulations? What should be regulations if expressed in
, per unit Hertz/per unit megawatt?
1
Solution: AP= --M
R
I
~P = --M
2 R2
J
M=0.5 Hz
Power is shared in proportional to their ratings
100
~P = 100 x - = 25 MW
I 400
300
~P = 100 x - = 75 MW
2 400
ww
w.E R2 = -
0.00667
50
300
x-
I
= 0.04 pu HzlPu MW
a syE
Both have the same value, even though based on their individual ratings, they have
different regulation.
ngi
E 6.4 Determine the primary load frequency control loop parameters for a control area having
the following data:
nee
Total rated area capacity Pr = 1000 Mw
Normal operating load
Inertia constant H = 4.0 sec
= 500 MW
rin
Solution:
Regulation R = 2.5 Hzlpu MW g .ne
Load damping
OP 500MW
D = Of = 50Hz = 10 MW/Hz
t
[Here, the load damping is assumed linear and percentage change is assumed to be
the same]
10
In per unit D =- = 0.01 pu MW/Hz
1000
2H 2x4.0
Tp = fsD = 50x 0.01 = 16 sec
1 1
K
p
= -
D
= -O.oI~
- = 100 Hzlpu MW
E 6.5 Determine the area frequency response characteristic and the static frequency error for
a system with the following data, when I % load change occurs?
D = 0.0 I pu Mw/Hz
R = 2.5Hzlpu MW
Tp = 16 sec
Kp = 100 Hzlpu MW
Solution:
1
Area frequency response characteristic ~ =D+ R
ww 1
asy M=- M =-
~ 100 x 0.41
=0.02439Hz
En
E 6.6 In the example E6.5, the governor is blocked so that it does not change the generation.
gi
In that case what would be the steady state frequency error?
Solution:
nee
When the governor is not acting, the feedback loop is not existing. In such a case R is infinite.
I
~=D+ R =D=O.OI puMW/Hz r ing
Hence, ~f = - -
M
~
=- -0.01 = -I Hz
0.01
. net
Frequency falls by 1 Hz (i.e.) f = 50 - I = 49 Hz.
It may be noted that with the generator acting the frequency from E6.5 is
50 - 0.02439 = 49.9756 Hz
The importance of feedback through governor mechanism can be understood from the
above.
E 6.7 A 100 MVA synchronous generator operates initially at 3000 rpm, 50Hz. A 25MW load
is suddenly applied to the machine and the steam valve to the turbine opens only after
0.5 sec due to the time lag in the generator action. Calculate the frequency to which the
generated voltage drops before the steam flow commences to increase to meet the new
load. The value of the stored energy for the machine is 5kW-sec per KVA of generator
energy. Also calculate the value of H constant for the generator.
Solution:
Stored energy = 5KW per/kVA
(i.e.,) = 500 MW sec pr 100 MVA
Load increase =25 MW
Energy required to supply this load for 0.5 sec = 25 MW sec
Frequency at 500 MW sec stored energy = 50Hz
Frequency fall = M
ww M
-=-=
f
i1f
50
25xO.5 MW
500
sec
asy
Frequency falls to 50 - 1.25 = 48.75 Hz
H constant =
E stored kinetic energy at rated frequency = 5MW - sec x I OOMV A = 5 sec
machine rating
ngi MV A I OOMV A
nee
E 6.S Given the following parameters, obtain the frequency error. Plot it when a step load
disturbance of (i) I % and (ii) 2% occur in the system.
Tp = 22 sec
rin
Solution:
R = 2.5
Kp= 100 g. net
Gp
The expression for i1F(s) = --I-~--i1PD(S)
l+-GsGToG p
R
Neglecting the turbine dynamics and governor action (G s GTO :::: 1.0)
k
i1F(S) =
I +STp I +~_~ s
R 1+ STp
ww
w.E
asy
En
gi
Fig. E6.8 Step load frequency error characteristic without supplementary control 1. k = 0.01
=
nee
2. k 0.02 (governor action and turbine dynamics are neglected
E 6.9 Show the effect of governor action and turbine dynamics, if they are not to be neglected
in E6.8 given Ts = 100 msec and TTG = 0.5 sec.
rin
Solution:
For this the exact frequency error is used g.n
LlF(S) = I Gp . LlPD (S)
et
1+ RGSGTGG p
_ Ks
LlPD(S) = O.Olpu; G s --'"""-- G TG -- K TG
1 +STs I+STTG
Ks KTG ::::: 1
The response is shown in Fig. E(6.9).
It can be seen that greater the step load change, larger the error and the governor action
and turbine dynamics does not cause any change in the response in the steady state, except for
a transient deviation at the beginning of the distribution.
ww
w .Ea
syE
ngi
nee
r ing
Fig. E6.9 Step load frequency error characteristic without supplementary control 1. k
= = =
=0.01
.
2. k 0.02 Ts 100 msec and TTG 0.5 sec
Solution:
To create a SIMULINK block diagram presentation select new (model) file from FILE menu.
This provides an untitled blank window for designing and simulating a dynamic system. Copy
different blocks from the simqIink libraries or other previously opened windows into the new
window by depressing the mouse button and dragging.
I. Open the continuous library and drag the transfer function block to the window.
Double click on transfer function to open the dialog box. Enter the numerator and
denominator values (the coefficients in the descending powers of s, if any power of
s is missing, enter zero) of the transfer function .
2. Open the math library and drag the sum block in to the window. Open the sum dialog
4. w.E
block and click on the Flip option to rotate the gain block by 180degrees.
Open the source library and drag the step input block to window. Double click on it
asy
to open its dialog box and set up the step time(step duration), initial and final
values(which will be same) to represent the step input.
5.
En
Open the sink library and drag scope to window to observe the response.
gin
By using the left mouse button, connect all the blocks.
Before starting simulation, set the simulation parameters. Pull down the simulation
eer
dialog box and select parameters. Set the start time, stop time and for a more accurate integration,
set the maximum step size.
ing
In this example the parameters for all the blocks for the system in the fig. are initialized.
Open m-fiIe and enter the parameter values. The following m-fiIe has to be run prior to the
simulation.( of model file)
.ne
Open new m-fiIe and enter the parameter values as shown below.
Tg = 0.2;
T t = 0.5;
t
H= 5;
D = 0.6;
R = 0.05;
%for integral control
Kj = 7;
Save the m-fiIe under parameters and run the file. SIMULINK block diagram and results
for LFC
By using above procedure construct the simulink block diagram for the load frequency
control of isolated power system as shown in Fig. E 6.1O(a).
Step
l/R
ww '-----------<-K-I4-----------'
w.E
Fig. E 6.1 O(a) Block diagram Model of Load Frequency Control (Isolated Power System)
asy
Pull down the file menu and use save as to save the model under AFC. Start the
simulation. Double click on the scope, click on the auto scale, the result is displayed as shown
in Fig. E 6.1 O(b).
En
Add integral controIIer block for above system and save the file under LFC 1.
gin
Start the simulation. Double click on the scope, click on the auto scale, the result is
displayed as shown in figure below.
eer
i ng.
n et
E 6.11 A single control area system with the following data experiences a sudden load change
of3%.
Kp= 100
Tp= 25
R = 2 Hzlp.u. MW
with integral control using a gain of 10 obtain the frequency plot with time and show that the
frequency deviation is reduced to zero.
Solution:
Using MATLAB, the solution is obtained and shown in Fig. (E 6.11).
ww Kj=IO Kp = IOO
d l = (I1Tp) + (K/ (R
Tp = 25
* Tp))
R =2
d2 = Kj * K/Tp
num = Kp/Tp
den = [I d l d 2]
w.E
asy
En Transfer Fan
gin
eer
ing
.ne
t
Fig. (E 6.11)
ww
for minimization. .
L ' (x,x,u, t) = L(x,u, t) + At[f(x,u, t) - x ..... (6.84)
w.E
Applying Euler-Lagrange equations, we obtain
.au
asy A.=--
ax ..... (6.85)
E . au
x=--
aA
ngi ..... (6.86)
0= au
au nee ..... (6.87)
g.
and A. denotes Lagrange multipliers. Simultaneous solution to eqn. (6.85, 6.86, 6.87)
subject to boundary conditions gives optimal control Uo. But, the equations are non linear and
time varying and hence even for simple systems the solution will be difficult to obtain.
net
6.23 The Linear Regulator Problem
Consider the linear dynamic system
Where Hand Q are real symmetric positive semi definite matries and P is a real symmetric
positive definite matrix. Again t2 is fixed, but X(t 2) is free. For simplicity, omitting the arguments .
..... (6.91 )
..... (6.93)
..... (6.94)
asy
En ..... (6.97)
or
gi nee ..... (6.98)
net
H XO(t 2) = +21 XO(t)+ +12 AO(t) ..... (6.100)
It can be derived from the above that
w.E - R (t) XO(t) - Q(t) XO(t) - AT(t) R(t) X (t) == 0 ..... (6.106)
asy
since the above eqn. must be satisfied for at XO(t)
R(t) + R(t)A(t) + AT (t)R(t) - R(t)B(t)p-l(t)B T(t)R(t) + Q(t) ..... (6.107)
En
• The above equation is called matrix Riccati equation. R is an n x n symmetric matrix.
n(n + 1)
2
gi
first order differential equations only need be solved to get the elements ofR matrix,
nee
so that the elements of feed back gain K(t) can be computed further from equation (6.102)
rin
For controllable dynamic systems H = 0, A, B, P and Q are time invariant matrices and as
S ~ ex) R(t) ~ RO, a constant matrix. The matrix Riccatti equation becomes
ROA + ATRo+ Q - ROBp-l BT RO = 0
g.n ..... (6.108)
where A.B and F are the system, input distribution and disturbance distribution matrices
respectively and X, U and d are the state, control and disturbance vectors respectively.
By a suitable transformation, eqn. (6.24) is transformed into the form.
X' =A'X' +B'U' ..... (6.110)
The LFC problem is then treated as a linear regulator problem and the solution is obtained
by solving algebraic Riccatic equation.
ww
deviation f~f.dt. The contrl signal is to be weighted and included in the cost function so that
too large a control is not required. The cost function selected is
w.E('T )
J= f 2"1
00
~ Qx + UT Pu dt ..... (6.111)
asyo
Where Q and P are the weighting matrices for the state and control vectors and X and u.
En
Consider the block diagram for the single area system shown in Fig. 6.26.
gi
r---II/R~--------------.....,
nee
r ~...-+t.F(s)
ing
Fig. 6.26 Block diagram for single area system.
ww
From the block diagram
a
S ~ F(s) 1
= __
Tp
syE~F(s) + Kp ~PTG (s) -
Tp
Kp M>D (s)
Tp
..... (6.115)
ngi
In the time domain, using the state variables
. () 1 Kp Kp
x2 t =--x2+-x3-~' d
As before,
STTG ~PTG(S) = ~xv(s) - ~PrG(s)
and in time domain
et
..... (6.118)
1
i.e., STs ~(s) = -~ ~ (s) + U(s) - - M(s) ..... (6.121)
R
In the time domain
..... (6.122)
Putting eqn. (6.113, 6.116, 6.119 and 6.122) in matrix from, the state variable model is
obtained as
0 0 0
XI (t) 0 0
-I Kp
0 0 0 kp
x2 (t) Tp 1p [ x2
Xl
-T
= __1_ _1_ + 0 + p d
x3 (t) 0 0 x3 0 ..... (6.123)
TTG TTG I
x 4 (t) __1_ I
x4 Ts
0 0 0
RTs -Ts
ww XI = Xl
w.E
"2 = x 2
x3 =
,
+ LlPD
asy
X3
x4 = X4 + LlPD
En
U + u' + LlPD
.'
gi 0 1
1
0
Kp
0
nee 0
[~} rin
Xl 0 0
Tp 1Tp 0
X2
= 0 I u' ..... (6.125)
0 0
X3
x4
.'
0
Tr
0
Tr
1
I
Ts g.n
RTs Ts
The optimal control to minimize the performance index given in equation (6.111) can be
determined using the solution technique described for the linear regulator problem. It is required
et
to solve the algebric matrix Ricoati equation.
Q + ATR + RA- RBp-l BT R =0 ..... (6.126)
for the elements of the R matrix which is positive defmite and symmetric. Kleinman's method
may be used to solve the matrix Riccati equation. An initial feedback gain vector KI is selected
such that the matrix ~ = [A - B K I] has eigenvalues with negative real parts. Then the matrix
equations.
Ai RT + ~ Al + Q + ~T P KI = 0
are to be solved for the elements of RI" The new gains are computed using
K(l) = p-l BT R
I I
The procedure is repeated till convergence is obtained for the elements of R I .
ww Q[~ ~1
w.E
Assume
Solution:
a syE
Substituting the parameters in the algebraic matrix Riccati equation and solving the equation
using, Kleinman's method with an initial vector of K j = [1 1 1 1]
The values of Ki converge to
K = ngi
[1.0000 1.1368 1.7092 0.2976]
The optimal control is shown in Fig. E 6.12.
nee
8
7 r ing
6
5 . net
r
';'
4
::: 2
~
0
::s
0
-1
6.27 Optimal Control for Tandem Compound Single Reheat Turbine- Generator
System
The model for tandem compound single reheat turbine is discussed in
Chapter 3 : The system is shown in Fig. 6.27.
ww
w.E
asy
Fig. 6.27 Tandem compound single reheat turbine system
En
The state - variable model of this system is given by
x = AX+Bu+ Fd
with the initial conditions X(O) = 0
gi nee
where XT =
= (f~f M
[Xl X2 X3
~PG
X4
~PRH
Xs
r
~PCH
X6]
~XV ] ing .... (6.128)
0
0
1
1 Kp
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
. net
Tp Tp
1 FHP
0 0
Tco TJ T2 TCH
A= 0 1 1
0 0 0
TRH TRH
1
0 0 0 0
TCH TCH
1
0 0 0 0
Ts
BT = [0 0 0 0 0 ;s 1
FT = [0 - ~: 0 0 0 0 1
u=APc and d=AP D
w.E
using the transformation
asy 0
0
En X=X'+
d
gi d
d
d nee
and u~1 + d
A quadratic cost function r ing
= r ±(X'T.QX· +u'TRu'~t . net
is selected and the algebraic matrix Riccati equation is solved as before to obtain the
optimal gains using the equations.
Q-RB p-l BTR + RA +ATR= 0
and u opt = _p-l BT RX
=_LTX ..... (6.129)
The results are plotted in Fig. E.6.
E 6.13 Compute the optimal load frequency control for a single thermal power system with
tandem compound single-reheat steam turbine with the following data
R = 20s TRH = 7.5s Kp = 2 p.u. Hz / p.u. MW
Ts = O.ls Tco = 0.45s Tp = 20s
TCH = 0.25s FHP = 0.3 D = 0.01 p.u.
FJP = 0.4 FLP = 0.3
1 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Q= ; P=1
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
ww 0 0 0 0 0 0
The solution is obtained using a computer program for the algorithm explained
w.E
in 6.26. The feedback gains, starting from initial values of unity for each, converge to the
following solution.
Time (5)
10
nee
15
....
..::: -2 x I0- 3 r ing
1 -3xI0-3
. net
Fig. E6,13 Optimal response
(a) Optimal response of time error to step load change
-4xI0-4 ,.-------------------
....~t 5
Or------+-~---_r-------+_--~-
10
+
-4xI0-4
15
-8x 10-4
-12x 10-4
ww A= 0
0
Tps
0
Tps
---
1
0
1
0
---
0
w.E 0 0
O.5Tw
0
0. 5Tw
0
0. 5Tw
1 0
asy 0
0
0
-KI
0
-K2 -K3
0 0
-K4 -Ks
E BT =[0 0 0 0 0
ngiTpT~TG 1
T
C =[0 0 0 0 0 nee
Tp~Gl
_ Kps r1in
pT = [0
u = ~ Pc = control input
Tps
0 0 0 Kps
Tp TR Tps
g. net
and d = ~ PD = step-load disturbance.
The constants Kl' K:z, K3 K4 Ks are given by
- Tps -TR
K1-
TpTGTRTpS
_ Kps
K2 -
Tp TG Tps
cr
K 3 =---
TpTGTR
K4 = TR(cr+o)+TG
. TpTGTR
1 1
Ks =-+-
Tp TR
The state and control variable are transfonned using the relation,
Xl
0
Xl
X 0
X2 2
X d
X3 3
= + d ..... (6.131)
X4 X
4
0
X5 X5 u'
X6 X6 TpTG
ww U = u' + d
The transfonned equations are
(j
and
En
B'T =
gin
The cost functional to be minimized is selected as
J=
eer
~ r(X'TQX' +u'Tpu')dt
in
Selecting Q and R matrices are :
1 0 0 0 0 0
g.n
Q=
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
et
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
andP=l
the algebraic matrix Ricccati equation
Q = R B' p-l B'T R + R A' +A'T R = 0
is solved for the elements of R.
The optimal control is obtained using
u = _p-l B'T R X'
opt
=_LTX ..... (6.120)
..... (6.133)
E 6.14 For the hydro system shown in Fig. 6.14.1; using the following data, compute the
optimal control
w
penstock
.Ea
syE
Permanent speed droop
nee
Fig. ES.14.1 Hydro speed governing system
o 4 8
Time (s)
12
--+ r 16 20 ing
. net
~ -0.004
~
5 (i) Optimal response
..,l: -0.008
.., (ii) Uncontrolled response
E
E=
-0.012
1 -0.016
(a)
Fig. ES.14.2 Uncontrolled and optimal response of hydro speed governing system
(a) uncontrolled and optimal response of time. error
8 = 0.2
The 100 % load conditions on the plant.
.,
----+
ww
Time (s)
0.0004
w.E
0.0004
t
E
0.0008
0.0012 asy
:::-
'-
<l 0.0016
En (i) Optimal response
(ii) Uncontrolled response
+ 0.0020
0.0024
gi nee
r ing
Solution:
Fig. E6.14.2 (b) uncontrolled and optimal response of frequency error
. net
Following the procedure outlined in Sec. 6.20, the optimal feed-back gain components are
computed as
LT =[1.0 3.4061 0.078 0.5393 0.1656 0.0063]
The uncontrolled and optimal response are shown in figure E6.14.2 (a) and (b).
3. The control which is a function of the states in turn is dependent on the load demand.
Accurate prediction of the load demand may be essential for realizing the optimal controller.
4. The optimal control is also dependent on the weighting matrices in equation (6.111) and
is thus not unique.
6.30 Load Frequency Control with Restrictions on the Rate of Power Generation
The optimal load frequency control discussed in section 6.25 does not include the effect of the
limits on the rate of change of power generation. If these limits were not included in the
control, there will be a tendency for the system to chase large momentary disturbances.
ww
This causes undue wear and tear of the controller. Even a telemetering outage may
cause problems to the system in operation. Several methods are proposed to include the effect
of generation rate constraints in the computation of the control.
w.E
If the generation rate constraints denoted by P are introduced into the state vector, the
system order will be changed. Instead of augmenting them, it is suggested that while solving
asy
the state equations, it may be verified at each step whether or not the generation rate constraints
are violated.
E ngi
Another simple way of considering the generation rate constraints is dual mode control
strategy. Separating the state vector X into those states which are to be rate limited as XI and
nee
the rest by xr, the state space representation of the system becomes
max
That is IAn Xd+AIr Xr +BI u~ XI
max
UO(t) = -K,X; ifx'J < Xlj j = 1,2, ............ ,n ..... (6.137)
The generation rate constraints result in larger deviations in area control errors. As the
rate at which generation can change in the area is constrained by the limits power import via tie
lines becomes imperative. Under generation rate constrained conditions, the selection of governor
ww
speed regulation cofficient R requires careful consideration. In practice, a low value, of the
order of2 to 4%, is chosen for R. With ,a proper, supplementary control, the steady state error
w.E
can be reduced to zero, whatever may be the value ofR. However, it is desirable that a proper
value of R be selected so as to give the best dynamic response. Improper selection of R may
lead to instability whatever may be the integral controller gain settings.
asy
In systems with hydro-thermal combination, the generation rate in the hydro area
En
generally remains below the safe, permissible generation rate, and as such the rate constraints
for generation at all the hydro plants can be omitted.
gi
The presence of governor dead-band introduces oscillations in the dynamic response. It
nee
has been reported that the governor dead band does not influence the selection of integral
controller gain settings in the presence of generation rate constraints.
ww
readju tment of generation. This tertiary control can be implemented by using economic
dispat h computer which works on the cost characteristics of various generating units in the
area. The speed changer settings are once again operated in accordance with economic dispatch
w.E
computer programme.
asy
En
gi nee
rin
g.n
et
QUESTIONS
6.1 Explain the necessity of maintaining a constant frequency in power system operation.
6.2 With a neat diagram, explain briefly different parts of a turbine speed governing system.
6.3 Derive the model of a speed governing system and represent it by a block diagram.
6.4 With a block diagram explain the load frequency control for a single area system.
6.5 Derive the model of a speed governing system and represent it by a block diagram.
ww
6.6 With first order approximation explain the dynamic response of an isolated area for load
frequency control.
w.E
6.7 Discuss the importance of combined load frequency control and economic dispatch
control with a neat block diagram
asy
6.8 Discuss in detail the importance of load frequency problem.
E
6.9 Distinguish between load frequency control and economic dispatch control.
ngi
6.10 A synchronous generator supplies power to a synchronous motor via a transmission
nee
network. Find equivalent inertia constant of a machine connected to infinite bus.
6.11 Explain how modem control theory can be applied to load frequency control
rin
6.12 Describe how optimal control can be determined in case of LFC problem.
PROBLEMS
P 6.1 Two generators rated 200MW and 400MW are operating in parallel. The droop
characteristics of their governors are 4% and 5% respectively from no load to full
load. Assuming that the generators are operating at 50Hz at no load, how would a
load of 600Mw be shared between them? What will be the system frequency at this
load? Assume free governor operation. Repeat the problem if both the governor
have a droop of 4%.
P 6.2 A 100MVA asynchronous generator operates on full load at a frequency of 50Hz.
The load is suddenly reduced to 50MW. Due to time lag in the governor system, the
ww steam valve beings to close after 0.4 secs. Determine the change in frequency that
occurs in this time. Given H = 5 KW -s/KYA of generator capacity.
w.E
P 6.3 Two generators rated 200Mw and 400MW are operating in parallel. The droop
characteristics of their governors are 4% and 5% respectively from no load to full
asy
load. The speed changes are so set that the generators operate at 50Hz sharing the
load of600Mw in the ratio of their ratings. If the load reduces to 400Mw, how will
E
it be shared among the generators and what will the system frequency? Assume
ngi
free governor operation. The speed changers of the governors are reset so that the
load of 400MW is shared among the generators at 50Hz in the ratio of their ratings.
nee
What are the no load frequencies of the generators?
P 6.4 In the single area system shown below determine
rin
(a) The steady state frequency error with t.P c = 0
(b) Critical gain K of the integral control of t.P c = - fKM
g.n
et
P 6.5 A 500Mw generator is operating at ~ load of20Mw. A load change of I % causes the
frequency to change by 1%. If the system frequency is 50Hz determine the value of
load damping factor in per unit.
ww
7 w.E
CONTROLOF
asyE SYSTEMS
INTERCONNECTED
ngi
nee
rin
Power Systems came into existence in 1880s and from that time onwards the systems have
grown enormously in both size and complexity. For better performance and reliability of
g.n
operation and control, there were many significant developments in generation, transmission
and distribution. The concept of energy control centers emerged in 1970's. Computer aided
analysis and computer based control have been proposed in this context.
A and partly by B. The tie line power flow will change thereby. If a frequency controller is
placed at B, then it will shift the governor characteristic at B parallel to itself as shown in
Fig. 7.1(c) and the frequency will be restored to its normal value fs' reducing the change in
generation in A to zero.
feN)
f(N)
ww A
• B
~
1
,iPA
1
wE
I.- . -J
1
,iPB
1
14-
1
I...
~_..J.-_ P
asy-+---'--~
o
~---t-- P -t---+---t~
E
(b)
ngi
{}
(c)
(a)
(b)
Two interconnected stations
nee
Uncontrolled system with load increment on Station B
(c) Frequency controller located at Station B
rin
Fig. 7.1 Two station system
g.n
et
If the load increment comes on station A, then as before, initially the generation in both
A and B changes to absorb the additional load, while finally the additional load is absorbed by B
only. Station A absorbs none of its load changes in the steady state. It is possible that, in
interconnected operation, a given station can be made to absorb the load changes occurring
elsewhere in the system so long as the controlling station has capability to absorb the change.
The same analysis can be extended to a two area system.
Assumption in Analysis:
The following assumptions are made in the analysis of the two area system:
1. The overall governing characteristic of the operating units in any area can be
represented by a linear curve of frequency versus generation.
2. The governors in both the areas start acting simultaneously to changes in their
respective areas.
3. Supplementary control devices act after the initial governor response is over.
The following time instants are defined to explain the control sequence:
to is the instant when both the areas are operating at the scheduled frequency and
tie line interchange and load change takes place.
t l is the instant when governor action is initiated at both A and B.
t2 is the instant when governor action ceases.
t3 is the instant when regulator action begins.
t4 is the instant when regulator action ceases.
Consider a load increment in area B. From Fig. 7.2(a), it is clear that at the end of the
ww
governor response, the tie-line schedule is upset and frequency is less than normal. If now a
frequency controller is provided in area B, which shifts the governor characteristic upwards,
w.E
parallel to itself, so as to provide the required control action, generation in B meets its own load
change. Tie line schedule is maintained. Change in generation in A is also reduced to zero.
a
Consider now the controller action to load change in area A with the controller located in
syE
area B as before. The response is shown in Fig. 7.2(c).
f f
ngi
Load change
inB
Load change
inB
f nee
rin
g.n
PA 0 PB PA 0
I I I
I I I
I I
et
PB
t4 - -
I I I
t3 - -
--- --1-
t2 - -
t3 - -I-
tI - - -
t2 - -I-
--- -'"'-
to ~
To A ~ To B
To A ~ ~To B
(a) (b)
Unregulated case Controller at B
o I PB
I I I
ww -,- --j-
I I I
w.E -,-
asy To A ~ 0 ~ To B
gin
While the initial governor response is the same as for the previous case, the action of the
controller in B will force the generation in area B to absorb the load increment in area A. When
eer
the controller begins to act at t 3, the governor characteristic is shifted parallel to itself in B ti II
the entire load increment in A is absorbed by B and the frequency is restored to normal. Thus,
ing
in this case while the frequency is regulate<i on one hand, the tie-line schedule is not maintained
on the other hand.
.
If area B, which is in charge of frequency regulation, is much larger than A, then load
changes in A will not appreciably affect the frequency of the system. Consequently, it can be
said that flat frequency control is useful only when a small system is'connected to a much
net
larger system.
Case 1 : Let a load increment take place in area A. It is assumed that following the initial
governor response, the frequency controller in A acts first at t3 and its control action
ceases at t4 . By the time the tie-line controller at B becomes effective at t5, it finds the
system in normal condition. both frequency and tie line deviations are reduced to zero,
and further regulating action is unnecessary. This action is shown in Fig. 7.3(a).
f
ww
w.E
asy
PAl Flat 0 Tie -line 1 PB
I frequency frequency 1
controller controller
ts-llii-l------Engi
t4 -
I 1 1
-l--+-----
______ L __
----- +---
-----1-
1 1
t3- ,
t2 -T
t1 ----
-,---
-T---
-----
-
- nee
-----1-
to--~~--~------------~----------~--~----
To A ~ 0 ----I.~ r
To 8
ing
.
Fig. 7.3 Flat time -line and frequency control- frequency controller in area A and tie-line
controller in area B.
(a) Load increment in area A - sequence of operation A - B - A - etc.
net
Case 2: Let the load increment occur in area B. The tie - line controller in B acts first
following the initial governor response at t3 and increases the generation in B ti II the load
increment is completely absorbed. At the instant t5, the frequency controller in A finds
that the conditions are normal and no regulating action is needed. The load increment in
B is absorbed by the generation in B itself. The case is illustrated in Fig. 7 .3(b).
Case 3 : Load change occurs in A and the controller in B acts first. The initial governor
response which begins at the instant t1 ceases at t2. The tie line controller in B begins
and completes its action before the frequency regulator at A takes control. During this
period of control action, i.e. t3-t 4 by the tie line regulator the frequency decreases further
than it was at the end of the governor action period while the tie line power schedule is
maintained.
ww I I controller controller
I
~:==~I
I I I
1======
w ::J------ =====llS'
t3 - -
t2- -
t)--+- .Ea -i------
~-----
-
- ----+
-----
---.1 _L
-I-
~-t-
syE
to----~-4------------~------------~--+--+
To A ~ 0 ------i~~ To B
Tie-line flows
ngi
Fig. 7.3 (b) Load increment in area B - sequence of operation B-A-B-etc.
nee
At t5 the frequency controller in A takes over and restores the frequency to its normal
value. It can be seen from Fig. 7.3(c) that the tie line schedule is again upset but by a
larger margin than before. Considering subsequent cycles of control action by the
rin
controllers in B and A, it can be seen by similar reasoning that stable operating conditions
cannot be attained for the sequence of regulator action conceived in this case.
f
g. net
®
Case 4 : Finally consider the load increment to have taken place in area B. Let us assume that
the frequency controller in A starts and completes its action the tie-line - controller in B starts
functioning. The response to governor and controller action is showf.l in Fig. 7.3(d).
f
ww
w.E
a syE
ngi
nee
To A . - - 0 ----i.~ To B
rin
Fig. 7.3 (d) Load increment in area 8 - sequence of operation A-8-A etc
g.n
The flat frequency controller at A incre?,ses the generation in A to correct the frequency
by shifting the characteristic parallel to itself upwards; The generation in A and hence the tie-
line power from A to B increases. At ts' when the tie-line controller takes over the control, it
will find excessive power flow from A to B and to keep it at the scheduled value, it increases
et
the generation in B. While doing so, the generation in A gets reduced and the tie line power flow
to B is also reduced. Finally, when the frequency controller begins to act in A at t8 neither the
tie-line power schedule nor the frequency is normal. The system starts oscillating and no
regulation is feasible.
It can be seen from the above analysis that if one of the regulators is sluggish in any area
where changes in power demand take place, than other regulators, flat tie-line flat frequency
regulator strategy cannot assist in getting the desired control.
With this type of controller, the regulator does not act to hold a constant tie-line interchange
regardless of system frequency, but instead allows the tie line schedule to deviate from the
normal in adjustable proportion to frequency deviations from the rated value. In principle, the
tie line bias controller in an area endeavours to take action for changes in load in its own
precincts, while taking no cognizance of the same for other interconnected areas. I
The characteristics of tie-line bias controller and flat frequency controller are shown in
Fig. 7.4.
ww
generation
Raise
Raise generation
generation
w.E 0 p~ 0 p~
asy
(a) Tie-line bias controller (b) Flat frequency controller
Fig. 7.4 Tie - line bias and flat frequency controller characteristics
En
The point of intersection of both the characteristics is the only point of operation where
gi
the system, frequency and tie line schedule can be maintained at the normal values. As in the
nee
previous control strategy, all the four possible cases of operation are discussed.
Let area A be equipped with a flat frequency controller and area B be provided with a
tie-line bias controller.
r ing
Case 1 : Consider a small load increment in Area A. Let the flat frequency controller in
area A act first.
. net
The response to governor and controller action is same as that shown in Fig. 7.5(a).
Following the initial governor response, the frequency controller in A begins and completes
its action before the tie-line bias controller at B comes into operation. Both the frequency
and tie-line power schedules are maintained at scheduled levels by the controller in A.
No further corrective action is needed by the tie-line bias controller in B.
Case 2 : Let the load increment take place in B with the tie-line bias controller in B acting
first. The response to governors and controllers would again be the same as given in
Fig. 7.5(b). Following the initial governor response, the tie-line bias controller in B acts
during t3 - t4 an9, by shifting the governor characteristic in B, both the tie line power
and frequency deviations are corrected. No further regulating action is required from
the controller in A.
Case 3: Let the load change occur in area A. The controller in area B acts first, followed
by the frequency controller in area A. If the governor characteristic is prevented from
being shifted by the action of the tie-line regulator in B during the interval t3 - t4 the
frequency controller in A can restore the frequency to its normal value during the period
t5 - t6 so that the controller at A acts for changes in load in area A only and absorbs all of
them. This can happen if the slope of the tic-line bias controller in B is same as the slope
of the governing characteristic at A at the point of operation under consideration. Under
such a condition, the response to controller action is shown in Fig. 7.S(a).
f
ww I I o
w.E -l-~---
-~-
asy ---1-
--1-
t2--
E-,-
tl ----
to ngi
To A ~ 0 --i~~ To B
rin
In In
g.n
Case 4 : Finally, let the load increment occur in B while the controller in A initiates action
first following the governor action. It r.an be seen from Fig. 7.S(b) that during the
et
period tl - t2, the governors in A act following the load increment in area B. The frequency
falls and the tie line power flows from A to B. During the period t3 - t4 , the flat frequency
controller in A acts, generation in A increases and more power flows to B via the tie-line.
The frequency is normal. During t5 - t6, the tie-lil}e bias controller in B acts to set the tie-
line deviation to zero. The governor characteristic is raised in B. Frequency increases
but tie-line flow from A to B is reduced. Neither the frequency nor the tie-line schedule
are normal at this stage. However, during the period t7 - t8, the flat frequency controller
in A again takes over the control and the governor is set at a lower value in A. Generation
in A is reduced until the frequency is normal and tie-line power flow deviation is zero.
From the above analysis it can be inferred that each controller operates effectively to
control load changes in its own area. For load changes in other interconnected areas,
the tie-line bias controller can be set to refrain from taking improper action while the
frequency regulator still persists in its tendency to sacrifice the local area requirement to
overall requirement.
ww
w .Ea
syE
To A ~ ---t~~ To B
7.5 (b) Load increment in area 8 - controller in A acts first
r ing
the response is shown in Fig. 7.6(a). The response to controller action is similar for load
changes in B when the controller in B initiates regulating action.
f
. net
o
I I
t4_
t3__
+_1. __ _
I I
--1----
t 2 __ --t---
tJ ----
to----~~------~-----~-~--
~ 0 ~ To 8
Tie-line flows
(a)
Fig. 7.6 Complete tie-line bias control - tie line controllers in both the areas A and 8
(a) controller action in A for local load changes
For the case when a controller initiates action for non-local load changes the controllers
will not act if the slope of the controller characteristic is matched to that of the governing
characteristic. The response characteristics are illustrated for a load change in area A while the
controller in B is the first to initiate action Fig. 7.6(b).
During this period the controller in B is prevented from regulating the system. The
. incremental changes are corrected by the controller in A only, during t5 - t6 . The control action
is quite satisfactory. From the above analysis, it is seen that the governor action in an area is
not opposed by supplementary control action in the same area.
f
®
ww
w.E
asy
E ngi
to----~~------~----~~---
nee
A"-- 0
rin~B
Tie-line flows
Fig. 7.6(b) Load change in A - controller in B acts first
g.n
et
The governor action is not changed till the controller in the area, where a load change
has occurred, becomes effective. This avoids unnecessary change in generation, frequency or
tie-line power. The controller in the area, where load change occurs, acts in such a manner that
the area absorbs its own load change. Only a single shift is necessary to the governor
characteristic to restore both frequency and tie-line power to normal. A smooth, cooperative
regulation is thus achieved with a tie-line bias-tie-I ine bias control scheme for the two area system.
For successful operation, it is imperative that the control characteristic of each tie-line
bias controller must have the same slope as the governor characteristic of its own area.
Fig. 7.7 shows the three types of controller characteristics for comparison.
It can be seen from Fig. 7.7 that flat tie-line control characteristic and flat frequency
control characteristic are only limiting cases of tie-line bias control characteristic with zero
bias and infinite bias respectively. A tie- line bias controller with larger bias (less slope) compared
to its area governor charlatanistic will be more sensitive to load changes in the outside system
than the governor and acts like a flat frequency controller.
I
f f f I Lower gen
Raise Lower Lower gen
gen gen
Raisegen Governor
gen characteristic
'----..:...----. p ' - - - - - - - -.. P
A+-- ~B ~p A~ ~B
(a) Flat tie-line controller (b) Flat frequency controller (c) Tie-line bias controller
ww If the tie-line bias controller has larger slope (smaller bias) than the governor
w
characteristic, it acts like a flat tie-line controller. It is therefore necessary to match the speed
.Ea
governor characteristic and the tie-line bias control characteristic for satisfactory control.
syE
ngi
nee
r ing
.
In I' I"
Further, as the tie-line bias controller acts to correct the deviations in the tie-line power
net
flow schedules, the tie-line interchange must be metered accurately and then a correcting
strategy be applied.
If the tie-line bias controller characteristic is not matched to the concerned area governor
characteristic, the effect could be seen from the following analysis.
Let the governor characteristics of areas A and B be represented by curves I and 2 as
shown in Fig. 7.8. The tie-line bias controller characteristic is assumed to coincide with the
governor characteristic in area A (i.e. curve I) but the characteristic of the controller in area B
is assumed to be curve 3.10 is the actual tie-line power flow. Due to mismatching of the curves
in B, the interchange increases to " and the frequency falls from the synchronous frequency
fs to f '. In order to control the frequency, the characteristic' is shifted upwards to I' and the
curve 3 to 3'. The inter-change increases to I" while the frequency is regulated. After this
discussion mathematical analysis of the two area system will b~ now presented.
In chapter 6, single control area and its response to changes in load, both uncontrolled
and controlled is discussed. Let us consider now two control areas connected by a tie-line.
Each control area will have the same frequency and the same frequency deviations for the
entire area. The tie-line is considered weak in the sense that both the areas can have frequency
deviations different from each other in uncontrolled mode (i.e) M, and f1f2 respectively.
ww I'D
12
w .Ea
Fig. 7.9
Consider two inter connected areas as shown in figure operating at the same frequency
fl while a power
syE
P,~ flow from area I to area 2 let IV,I and IV 21 be the voltage magnitudes at
8? and 8~ voltage phase angles at the two ends of the tie-line while P,~ flows from area I to
area 2 then,
ngi
pO
12 -
_IVlllv2ISin(~o
X \u,
-(0)
2
nee ..... (7.1 )
f1P12 =
Iv,ollv~1
X
0 0
COS(OI - oJ (f1P, - f1P 2 )
. net
..... (7.2)
f1P 12 f1P 11
Defining --'-=--- = ---
MW/radian ..... (7.3)
f10 1 -M2 M
as synchronizing coefficient of the tie-line or "stiffness coefficient" of the line, denoted
by~
..... (7.4)
In otherwords
ww 21tT o
L\P12 (S) = - - [L\FI (S) - L\F2 (S)] ..... (7.7)
w .Ea
S
Block schematic of the above equation is shown in Fig. (7. I 0)
If the two areas are rated at Prl and Pr2
then if
P
_rl
P
syE
=a
12
r2
ngi
nee
r ing
_---:--,I-_ _ _ _ -~--.--:--I~~
.L\P 1(s)
net
. . t------.,li..r--I
.
L\P 12(S) ~-
2n:TO
I
-6T1(s)
RI
6PRefl
ww
w.E
6P Ref2
asy
I
-6T2 (s)
R2
+
E ngi
nee
Fig. 7.11 Block diagram for 2-area systems
..... (7.8)
..... (7.9)
where LlP~G,1 and LlP~G,2 are the steady state changes in turbine-generator outputs.
Also, from the same Fig. 7.11, at the summing point of load and tie-line powers, we get
°
( -~M -kl -LlP12 Kpi = M
I 0) ° ..... (7.10)
(i.e.)
since
ww
solving the above equations (7.11) and (7.12)
we obtain
w.E ,1fo = -( kl + k2
~I + ~2
JHz ..... (7.13)
and
a ApO __ ApO _ ~lk2 -~2kl
Ll
syE
12 - Ll 21 -
~I +~2
..... (7.14)
ngi
1
where ~I =D 1 + - ..... (7.15)
RI
and ~2 = D2 + -
1
R2 nee ..... (7.16)
and
..
If a load disturbance occurs in only one of the areas, it is clear that with kl = 0 or
k2 = 0 the frequency derivation ~fl is only half of the steady state error that would have
occurred had there been no inter connection. Thus, with several systems inter connected, the
steady state frequency error would be reduced.
Also from the tie-line power derivation it can be observed that half of the load change in
either area will be supplied by the other area, which demonstrates the importance of emergency
assistance in inter connected or pool operation.
ww
From the block diagram of Fig. (7.11) the following equation can be written
asy
E ngi
nee
rin
~P21 (S) = -~P21 (S)
g.n
There are four equations with four variables, ~fl' ~f2' ~P12 and ~P21 to be determined
for given
involved.
~PDl and ~PD2.
et
The dynamic response can be obtained; even though it is a little bit
For simplicity assume that the two areas are equal. Neglect the governor and turbine
dynamics, which means that the dynamics of the system under study is much slower than the
fast acting turbine-governor system in a relative sense. Also assume that the load does not
change with frequency (D, = D2 = D = 0).
We obtain under these assumptions the following relations
since D = 0
O
1 ~P12 (S) ] - f =~FI (S)
ww [ - -R ~FI (S) - ~PDl (S) -
2SH
..... (7.21)
w.E1
[ - -R ~F2 (S) - ~PD2 (S) - ~P21 (S) ] - f
2SH
O
= ~F2 (S) ..... (7.22)
a
subtracting (7.22) from (7.21)
syE
~ ~FI (S) + ~R ~F2 (S) -
n
~PDl ~PD2 g~P12i
[- R (S) + (S) -
ne~P21e ~ ~F ~F
(S) + (S)]
2SH
=
I
(S) -
2
(S)
rin
~P12 (S)
° g.
O
1 ] f
[ -R ~F2 (S) + ~FI (S) + ~PD2 (S) - ~PDI (S) - 2~PI2 (S) -2SH = 2nT
net ..... (7.23)
since
Therefore,
ww
w.E ..... (7.~4)
a syE
The denominator is of the form
ngi
(S2 +2KS+ro 2)=(S+K)2 +(ro 2 _K2)
nee
where
rin
setting
g.n
et
..... (7.25)
Note that both K and ro 2 are positive. From the roots of the characteristic equation we
notice that the system is stable and damped. The frequency of the damped oscillations is given
by roo.
Since Hand fO are constant, the frequency of oscillations depends upon the regulation
parameter R. Low R gives high K and high damping and vice versa. IfR ~ a; K ~ 0 is the
condition for no-governor action and there will be undamped oscillations.
We thus conclude from the preceding analysis that the two area system, just as in the
case of a single area system in the uncontrolled mode, has a steady state error but to a lesser
extent and the tie line power deviation and frequency deviation exhibit oscillations that are
damped out later.
ww A load change of200 MW occurs in area I. Determine the new steady state frequency.
1lution:
w.E
asy kl = 0.2pu ; k2 = 0
I
En
I
PI =0 1 +-=0.85+--=90.9091+0.85=91.7591
Rl 0.011
P2 = O 2 + -
1
R2
gi 1
nee
= 0.95 + - - = 55.55 + 0.95 = 56.405
0.Ql8
~fO = kl = 0.2
(131 +P2) 91.7591+56.405
r ing
=~=0.0013683
148.16 p.u. Hz
-k 1P2
~Ptle-line = A A
PI +P2
= (~fl) P2 = -0.0013683 x 56.405
= -0.0771789 p.u MW
= -77.1789 MW
E 7.3 In E 7.1 if the load disturbance occurs simultaneously also in area 2 by 100 MW determine
the frequency and tie-line power changes.
Solution:
K2 = 0.1 pu
ww tIe - hne rt rt
PI +P2
En = - 14.2082 MW
E7.4 Two interconnected areas A and B have capacities 2000 MW and 750 MW respectively.
gi
The speed regulation coefficients are 0.1 p.u. for both the areas on their own area
nee
ratings. The damping torque coefficients are 1.0 p.u. also on their own base.
Find the steady state change in system frequency when a load increment of 50 MW
rin
occurs in area A. Find also the tie line power deviation. System frequency is 50 Hz.
Solution:
~
o k2 + a l2 k l
f = --=---'-"--'-
~2 + a12~1
50Mw 1
kl = 2000puMW = 40 puMw;k2 =0
1
2.67x-
MO= 40 = 0.06675 = 0.08267Hz
0.22 + 2.67 x 0.22 0.8074
ww
The frequency drop
w.E ~f
°
== - ~PDA
~
== - 40 == -0.1 13636Hz
0.22
asy
E7.6 For a two identical area system the following data is given. Determine the frequency of
oscillations when a step load disturbance occurs.
En
Speed regulation coefficient == R == 4 Hz Ip.u. MW
Damping coefficient D == 0.03 pu MW1Hz
System frequency = 50Hz gi nee
The tie - line has a capacity of 0.1 p.u.
r
The power angle is 30° just before the occurrence of the load disturbance.
Solution: ing
fo
K == - - ==.
50
4RH 4x4x5
== 0.625 . net
TO == 0.1 cos 30° == 0.0866
E7.7 A power system consists of two areas interconnected by a tie line which has a capacity
of 500MW and is operating at a power angle of 35°. If each area has a capacity of
5000MW and the speed regulation coefficients for both the areas are also the same and
are equal to R = 2HzJpuMW determine the frequency of oscillation of the power for step
change in load. The intertia constants are also the same for both the areas and are equal
to H = 5sec.
Solution:
500
TO = --cos35° = 0.819 x 0.1 = 0.0819
5000
asy
E7.8 In the above problem, if a step load change of85MW occurs in one of the areas determine
the tie line power deviation.
Solution:
En
A power of 85/2
change occurs.
= gi
The two areas are equal, the load change will be shared equally by both the areas.
nee
42.5 MW will flow from the other area into the area where a load
r ing
E7.9 Two power stations A and B operate in parallel. They are inter connected by a short
transmission line. The station capacities are 100MW and 200MW respectively. The
net
(b) the loads on respective bus bars are 60MW and 190MW and
(c) the load is 150MW at the station A bus bar only.
Solution:
Case: (a) P'+P 2 = 125+125 = 250MW
No-N fo-f
Regulation ---"--=--
PI 1-f
-=--
100 0.03
P 1- f
- 2= - -
200 0.02
0.0003P I = (I - f) = 0.0001P 2
that is, 3P I = P2
P I +P2 =2S0
Solving PI = 62.S MW and P2 = 187.SMW
A B
ww 125MW 125MW
w.E
Case (b) : the loads on each bus bar is determined by the speed regulation characteristics.
asy 3 PI = P2
PI + P2 = 60 + 190 = 2S0MW
Solving
E PI = 62.S MW and P2 = 187.S MW
ngi A B
62.5MW nee
~f--+-~_2'5-0--+----i~ 187.5MW
rin
60MW
net
3 PI = P2
PI + P2 = ISO
Solving PI = 37.S
P2 = 112.SMW
A B
37.5MW
r;:::'\ ~ I 12.5 M W I r;:::'\
'01--I~I---------+---1'0 112.5MW
150MW
E7.10 The turbines in a power station A have a ulliform speed regulation of 2.5% from no -
load to full load. The rated capacity of the! generators connected to the bus bars total
60MW and the frequency is 50Hz. Station B has total generating capacity of 35MW at
the bus bars and has a speed regulation of 3.0% connected through an induction motor
generation set rated 10MW. Which has1a fupload slip of 3.0%. There are loads of
32MW and 24.5MW connected to station A ~nd B respectively. Find the load on the
inter connecter cable at this operating condition.
Solution:
ww 60MW
A -+p IOMW
6?-+--~~M_G---,set1---~---+---l6?
B
35MW
w.E
asy
Let P MW flow from A to B
32MW 24.5MW
Total load on A
Total load on B
E
=
=
(32+P)MW
(24.5 -P) ngi
Percentage drop
.
In speed at A =
nee
(32 + P)
2.5 -=----~
60
rin
Percentage drop
.
In
d
spee at B =
3 (24.5 - P)
.5 -'-----'-
35 g.n
3P
Percentage drop in speed of induction motor generator set = 100
et
Percentage drop in speed at B - percentage drop in speed at A = percentage drop in
speed of induction motor generator set
3.5(24.5 - P) 2.5(32 + P) 3P
=-
35 60 10
(24.5 - P) 3P 32 + P
-'-----'- - - =--
10 10 24
solving 106P = 268
268
P = 106 = 2.5283MW
P flows from A to B
ww
areas must contribute their share to frequency control in addition to taking care of their own
net interchange.
w.E
The control error for each area can be now defined as a linear combination offrequency
asy
and tie line power errors.
Area control error for area I; ACE 1 = ~P12 + 8 1~f1 . .... (7.26)
E
and area control error for area 2; ACE 2 =
ngi
Hence in the block diagram of Fig. 7.11 now the
~P21 + 8 2 ~f2
~p ref commands
..... (7.27)
can be defined .
g.
where 8 1 and 8 2 are the frequency bias parameters for areas I and 2 while K·1 and K;
net
are the integral controller gain constants.
Note that under steady state conditions when ~p 12 and ~fl, ~f2 become zero, from
eqn. (7.26) ~P12 + 8 1~f1 = 0 and ~P21 + 8 2 M2 = 0 convey that the controller action in the final
stage is independent of 8 1 and 8 2 .
In fact, even one of the 8's, either 8 1 or 8 2 can be zero. It is suggested that only one 8
I
can be selected as equal to the area frequency response characteristic P= 0 + - to give
R
satisfactory performance.
The complete tie-line bias control of a two area system is shown in Fig. 7.12.
p
If area ratings are different (-I) block is replaced by (- a 12 ) = (f-
r2
.-----~B,~--.---------~
I
-~F,(s)
R,
ww
w.E
asy
E ngi
Fig. 7.12 Tie-line bias control of a two area system
nee
The selection of integral controller gains K'I and K; must be such that too large a value
rin
should not lead to chasing of minor deviations of no-consequence.
The change in natural frequency ~ fn following the load change as dictated by the
governor characteristic is
M=~PD
Pn
sc
If ~ fb is the system frequency deviation due to the controller, then
M =~PD
S B
s
from eqn. (7.30) and (7.31)
ww M = _ _ _~_P=-D_ _
n PACa + PBC (1- a)
..... (7.32)
and
w.E ..... (7.33)
asy
The improvement change in frequency deviation, as a percentage of the initial
disturbance is
En ..... (7.34)
gi nee
r ing
(PAC - BA)a
(BA - Pnc)a + PBC
x 100 . net
..... (7.35)
ww
7.13 State Variable Model for a Three Area System
In chapter 6 state variable mode for a single area system and application of optimal control has
w.E
been discussed. Modern control theory can be applied very elegantly for multi area system.
The block diagram representation of a three area system is shown in Fig. 7.13.
a syE
The folIowing equations are written directly from the block diagram.
ngi
nee
rin
g.n
et
ww
w.E
asy
E ngi ..... (7.38)
nee
rin
g.n
et
asy
E ngi
nee
rin
g.n
~Ptlel =21tTI02(MI-M2)+21tTI03(MI-MJ
et
~Ptie.2 = 21tT~1 (M 2 - Ml ) + 21tT~3 (~f2 - ~fJ
~Pl1e,3 = 21tT~1 (M3 - M 1 )+ 21tT302 (M) - M 2 )
The above equations are put in the form
ww
1
0 0 0 0 0
Kpl
0 0
_ Kpl
0 0
TPl
0
0
w 1
Tp2
0
T .Ea0 0 0
TPl
0
KPl
TP2
0
Kp3
TPl
0
Kp2
TPl
0
Kp3
syE
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tp2 Tp3 Tp3
1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tn Tn
A=
0 0 0 0
TT2
0
1
0
ngi
1
TT2
0
1
0 0 0
..... (7.41)
0
"='
.,1=
~
....
...
---
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tn
0
0
1
0
0
Tn
0nee 0
0
0
0
0
0
=
=
1=
=
rin
RITSl TSl =-
0
1
0 0
1 n
R2 TS2
0 0 0
~~2
0 0 0 0
=
.,=
....
0 0 ---
1
R3 TS3
0 0 0 0 0
TS3
1
0 0 0
g.n -
I
=
...
=
j et
A P Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
R B s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =
~
T U C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .,
~
00
'<
....
r.I
~
a
r.I
Where,
A= 21t(TI02 + TI03)
B= 21t(Tfl + Tf3)
c= 21t(T~1 + T3 02 )
-P = -21tTI2°
ww Q- = - 21tT °
I3
w.E- -
R = -21tT2I°
°
a S = -21tT23
-
syE
T = -21tT31
0
- ° n
and
gi
U = -21tT32
nee
0 0 0
rin
0
0
0
0
0
0 g.n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 et
0 0
1
B= 0 0 ..... (7.42)
TSI
0 0
TS2
0 0
TS3
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Kpi
0 0
Tpi
_ Kp2
0 0
Tp2
Kp3
0 0
Tp3
0 0 0
0 0 0
F-~
..... (7.43)
ww 0
0
0
0
0
0
w.E 0
0
0
0
0
0
a 0
0
0 syE
0
0
0
0
0
0
ngi
The equations can be written down for any number of interconnected areas in a similar
manner.
P g.n
and a I2 =-_ll
Pr2
The system matrices time become
et
1 Kpi _ Kp2
0 0 0 0
TpI Tpi Tp2
Kp2 Kp2
0 0 0 0 -a 12 -
T-
Tp2 Tp2 P2
Kpi
0 0 0 0
Tst TSI Tpi
A= I
0 0 0 0 0
TS2 TS2
--- 0 0 0 0 0
RITSI TSI
0 --- 0 0 0 0
R2 TS2 TS2
21tTl~ - 21tTl~ 0 0 0 0 0
Downloaded From : www.EasyEngineering.net
Downloaded From : www.EasyEngineering.net
0 0
BT oro 0 0 TSI
000 0 0
TS2
:]
0 0 0 0
FT =
r KPI
:PI
o 0]
_ Kp2
0 0 0 o 0
Tp2
The static variables, control variations are disturbance variables reduce to
w.E LlPC2
d = [LlPDI ] respectively.
a syE
LlPD2
ngi
The state variable model for the single area system is a single input, single output model with
no tie-line power. The matrices of the system equations are
Tp
0 ~
Tp nee
A= 0
I
rin
Ts
0
Ts
1
g.n
0
RTs Ts
et
B= 0
1
Ts
_ Kp
Tp
F= 0
0
XT = [M LlPG LlX v]
u = LlPc
d = LlP D
a
The state variable mode for the system using eqn. (7.27) is given by
~1\ = syE
20 [- MI + 120(~PGI )-120(0.01) -120(~Ptle,I)]
1
~f2
1 ngi 120(~PG2) - 120(0.0) - 120(~Ptle,2 )]
~f3
= 20 [- M 2 +
nee
= 20 [- M3 + 120(~PG3 )-120(0.0) -120(~Ptie,3)]
1
rin
g.n
et
·
~XVI =--- -~XVI
0.08
1[ I]
+O.O--MI
2.5
· I[
~XV2 =--- -~XV2 +0.0--~f2
0.08
I]
2.5
· . 0.081[
~XV3 =--- -~XV3 +0.0--~f3
.
I]
2.5
~t( s)
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14
- 0.004
N - 0.008
~
'-
<l
-0.012
l - 0.016
ww - 0.020
w.E (a)
asy
;-\j}v Eng I,
I •
(",
. ~ \~
.~p G3 ine
eri
/,,
.,...............,. ~PG2
0
,,~PG,
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
n
9 10 11
g.n
12 13 14
(b)
Fig . E 7.4.1 Response of a three area system to step load change in one area:
~t( s)
et
(a) variation of frequency error (b) variation of generation changes
The equations are solved on digital computer using the Runge - Kutta method. The
results are plotted: The riot is silm,vn in Fig. E 7.4.I(c).
r
.!:!
0.002
0.001
0
c:
<l
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14
-D.OOI
lww
~t(s)
-D.002
-D.003
-D.OO4
-D.OOS
w\ I(\.\E;1
\
I ,'a "
II\! \! sy
-D.006
I I\ iI '\ // \
I
I", /
r'\'-.. . //"-......,~- ~ -~.~---
-D.007
-D.008
'\j
En -
-D.009
-D.OIO
\ 1
,)
'\
6Plie 1
gi
E 7.4.1 (c) Variation of tie line power nee
E7.12 Given the following parameters pertaining to a two area system in appropriate units
Ttl 0.28
r ing
Tt2
Tpi
0.3
18
. net
Tp2 20
RI 2.4
R2 2.5
TSI 0.1
TS2 0.1
Kpi 120
KP2 100
TI2 0.06
Obtain the frequency deviations in both the areas and tie power deviation when a load
change of llP DI == 0.0 I p.u. MW occurs.
Solution:
The system is simulated in MATLAB the frequency deviation is shown in Fig. E 7.S (a) and the
tie-line power deviation in Fig. E 7.S (b).
ww
w.E
asy
E ngi
nee
Fig . E 7.5(a)
rin
g.n
et
Fig. E 7.5(b)
E7.13 For the system given in E 7.5 obtain the controlled response of the system with tie-line
bias control.
Solution:
For tie line bias control the bias coefficients are computed form
I I I
8 1 =°1 + - = -- + -
RI KPI RI
I 1 1
and 8 2 = 0 2 + - = -- + -
R2 KP2 R2
An integral control gain of KI = 0.5 is used for both the areas.
The tie-line power deviation is shown in Fig. E 7.6(a) and the frequency response in
ww
Fig. E 7 .6(b).
w.E
asy A):OO5'
\
\
E \
\
ngi
nee
rin
Fig . E 7.6 (a) g.n
et
Fig. E 7 . ~ (b)
E7.14 In the system shown in example 7.5, if load disturbance of L1PDI = L1P D2 = occur
simultaneously obtain the freciuency response and tie line power deviation.
Solution:
The response of tie-line deviations and frequency deviation are shown in Fig. E 7.7(a)
and E 7.7(b).
;: ;,
"::0.005
-0,01
ww :..().Qj~
_·it
w.E
asy
-0.025
-0.03
En
-0.035 '----'---'-
0
gin
2 ---'-3--4'----'5---'-6--7"---8'-----'9----"0
I \ /''\,
et
2
0
I \ /' -/-----
MI -2 : \ I ~.
\)
-4
-6
~ v
-10
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 fO
E7.1S For the system in E (7.5) obtain tie-line bias controlled frequency and tie-line power
deviation with integral controller gains Kfl = K'2 = 0.5.
Solution:
The responses are shown in Fig. E 7.8(a) and E 7.8(b).
ww
w.E
asy
E ngi
nee
Fig. E 7.8 (a)
rin
g. net
The MATLAB programme and the simulation setup are given below.
Ttl 0.28;
Tt2 0.3;
Tpl 18;
Tp2 20;
RI 2.4;
R2 2.5;
ww Tsl
Ts2
0.08;
0.1;
w.E Kpl
Kp2
120;
100;
E Gain
-K- ngi
nee
rin
g.n
Transfer Fon
simout I
Transfer Fon I
To Workspace I
et
Scope 3
Gain I
~------------------~-K-~------~~~--------~
Gain
~----------------<-K-~------------------~,
Bl Gain 3
ww simout I
w.E To Workspace 1
a syE
ngi Gain I
~------------------C-K-~------~~~--------~,
nee
Fig. With tie-line bias control rin
7.16 Model Reduction and Decentralised Control g.n
et
Decentralized control has been developed to avoid the necessity of too many feedback loops in
the controller structure. Optimal controller design requires that every sensor output affect
every actuator input. In decentralized control, restrictions are placed on information transmission
between sensors and actuators.
l 2
Considering Fig. (7.14) XI is used to determine the vector u while X alone is used to
determine vector u2 •
This is complete decentralized control.
Model Reduction by Aggregation:
Consider
X(t) = AX(t)+ Bu(t) ..... (7.44)
ww
eqn. (7.44), given that the number of variables in 2 is much less that those in X.
For dynamic exactness
gi
are satisfied.
nee
The aggregate state vector 2(t) must be a linear combination of certain modes of X(t).
The eigenvalues of F are the eigenvalues of A corresponding to those modes of X(t) which are
retained in 2(t). In other words, a model reduction is achieved by retaining dominant modes.
r ing
Many a time, it is advantageous to define 2(t) corresponding to physical variables.
Then
2(t) = HX(t)
This may be termed as modal approximation.
. net
..... (7.49)
where 10 is a small, positive parameter. For 10 = 0, the system decomposes into two
completely independent sub systems. The two sub stems thus obtained may be treated each
separately for simulation, analysis and control design. The dimensionality of the problem is
then reduced.
In multi area operation, the decision makers in each area may use a detailed model of his
area and a dynamic equivalent of the remainder of the system. Thus, the same system appears
in different forms to different controllers. By singular perturbation technique, it is possible to
devise control strategy for fast and slow dynamic models of the system. Multi parameter
perturbation method may be used for periodic coordination of all the sub-system controllers
using Pareto control strategy.
ww Uo= FZ
w.E
The elements ofF can be obtained using various concepts in control theory. For example,
if minimum norm concept is utilized then
asy
Fj = K M; (M) M; tl M) j = 1,2, ...... , m ..... (7.53)
En
In eqn. (7.53) K is the full state variable feedback gain matrix.
For a two area power system each area may be controls u l and u2 which depend upon
the vectors ZI and Z2 given by
gi nee
ZJ = (LlfILlPoILlXEILlP"e,1 fACE)] ..... (7.54)
rin
zi = [Llf2LlPG2LlXE2LlP"e,dACE2] ..... (7.5~)
g.n
Remote measurements are thus avoided. In fact, area controllers are influenced only a
little by remote measurements.
et
Questions
7.1. Explain how the tie-line power deviation can be incorporated in two-area system
block diagram?
7.2. What is a tie-line? Explain
7.3. Derive the relation between steady state frequency error and tie-line derivation
for step load disturbances in both areas
7.4. What is area frequency response characteristic. Explain it in the context of two
ww 7.5.
area systems.
What are the advantages of inter connected operation of power systems? Explain.
7.6.
w.E
Explain how state variable representation can be obtained for a two area system.
Write down the equations.
7.7.
asy
Sketch and explain the block schematic of a two-area system.
7.8.
En
What are the features of the dynamic response of a two area system for step load
disturbances?
7.9.
7.10.
gi
Explain tie-line bias control applied to a two-area system.
nee
What are the considerations in selecting the frequency bias parameter.
r ing
. net
Problems
w.E
A load change of 100MW occurs in area l. Determine the new steady state
frequency and tie-line power derivation.
P 7.2
asy
In P 7.1 if a load change of 200MW occurs in area two determine the frequency
derivation and tie line power derivation.
P 7.3
En
In P 7.1 if a load change of 150MW in area I and a load change of 250MW in
area 2 occur simultaneously determine the frequency and tie line power derivation.
P 7.4
gi
Given Rl = 2.4Hzlpu MW
R2 2.6Hzlpu MW
nee
TTl
TT2
0.28s
0.31s r ing
TSI
TS2
Kpl
0.075 S
0.08s
100Hz / pu MW
. net
Kpl 120Hz / pu MW
Tl2 0.07 p.u. MW / rad
T21 0.07 p.u. MW / rad
Solve the state equations for a two area system and plot the frequency, generation
and tie line power deviations for a step load disturbance.
P 7.5 Repeat problem 7.4 using MATLAB compare the result.
P 7.6 Repeat problem 7.5 with PDI = O.Olpu MW in area I and PD2 = 0.01 pu MW in
area 2.
P 7.7 Repeat problem 7.3 with PD2 = 0.03 p.u. MW. What are your conclusions from
the study of the results of problem P7.6 and P7.7.
ww
w .Ea AND REACTIVE
8 VOLTAGE
syE
POWER CONTROL
ngi
nee
Industrial and domestic loads, both, require real and reactive power. Hence, generators have
rin
to produce both real and reactive power. Reactive power is required to excite various types of
electrical equipment as well as transmission network. The reactive power requirement of
g.n
consumers arises mostly from the lagging vars n.eeded to supply magnetizing current to
transformers and induction motors.
8.1 Impedance and Reactive Power et
In the transmission network, requirement is the difference between that absorbed in the series
inductance (J2X) and that produced in the shunt capacitance (y2B). There is a level of loading
at which the leading vars of charging current balance the lagging vars of the inductive lines;
called the natural or surge impedance loading of the system. This natural load for a transmission
line is given approxirtlately as (~) p.u., In the case of cables the shunt capacitance is higher
and series inductance is lower. As a consequence of which the natural loading is higher. However,
this limit is generally above the thermal limit of the cable. The natural impedance loading for
overhead lines is shown in Fig. 8.1 as a function of system voltage on logarithmic scale. The
conductors are bundled two together for 220kY and four for 380kY.. TaSte 8.1 shows the
reactive power requirements of overhead lines, cables and transformers. The reactive power
compensation of the transmission system depends on the load and its power factor. When the
ww 10 I 1-----'---'---'-------'-'------'-----'--'-
a
Fig. 8.1 Natural impedance loadings as a function of system voltage
syE
line is operated at no-load, the full charging power occurs and would result in considerable
increase in voltage unless some compensating device is used. With full compensation at
ngi
no-load, the line may be operated at any partial load between no-load and full-load with the
voltage not exceeding the permissible limits:
nee
Table 8.1 Var requirements of overhead lines, cables and power transformers
where P is the power transmitted at voltage Y over a line of length e at a power factor
cosq,. Higher voltages are selected for transmission to keep the losses in an economically
justifiable relationship to the power P. In view of the inverse square relationship, reduction of
reactive power becomes an essential factor for obtaining efficient operation of the high voltage
lines. The reactive power requirement of overhead lines are shown in Fig. 8.2(a) & (b).
ww Inductive /
wi...
600 /
700 kv/
400 / ./
.-- Ea -
/ ./
syE
0
_:;::=;:;:::P'" 1.0 1.5 2.0
0 200
p
ngi
Capacitive
(a)
nee
1.0
0.8 rin
0.6
0.4 g.n
r
Cl..
PSIt).2
-0.2
-0.4
0
2.0 et
-0.6
(b)
In order to supply quality service to customers reliably and economically, voltage and
(or) var control play (s) a leading role. Such a control has to be exercised at all the power
system. i.e. right from the generating point to the consumer terminals.
Rapid changes in voltage (flicker) can result due to some industrial loads such as a*
furnaces, arc welders, and wood chippers. Fig. 8.3 shows the real and reactive power demand
following the daily load cycle supplying a composite system load which may create relatively
large variations in voltage if control is not exercised. Also, there may be cyclic and non-cycli¢
loads that create voltage disturbance at both transmission and distribution levels.
5 5
r 4 r 4
ww 3
2
3
w.E
asy 10 20
Real power (MW)
30
~
10
Reactive power
20 30
(Mvar)~
gi
In addition, events such as planned line switching, un planned line trips, planned and
nee
unforeseen generator trips and equipment failure may produce voltage and var variations.
Unless proper voltage support is given at strategic locations in the system, the aforesaid events
r
may result in loss of stability and possible loss of service to a large number of consumers.
ing
For long distance transmission of power, the use of HVDC transmission has proved
.
economical in certain cases. The var demand of DC terminals varies usually from 0-60% of
net
the MW rating of the DC lines as power transfer is varied over its full range. When a fault
takes place on the nearby AC system, the var demand of the DC link may reach a high value
and unless compensated may produce large AC voltage variations.
Continuous control can be achieved by means of synchronous compensators installed
at line ends and/or in the intermediate substations.
The use of shunt connected controllable var compensation to improve the power transfer
capability and stability is an acknowledged fact. From Fig. 8.4 it can be seen that the theoretical
maximum power transfer takes place at a power angle of 0'2 = 90.
P'2= - -
xl2
Fig. 8.4 Power transfer with ,,0 intermediate voltage support
With an intermediate, controllable, shunt var compensator, the angle could be increased,
in principle to 1800 across the line (Fig. 8.5).
controllable shunt
var compensator
8.2
w.E
System Voltage and Reactive Power
Consider the system shown in Fig. 8.6. The voltage at bus 2 is related to the voltage at bus I
by the relation.
asy
Bus I Bus 2
.. En
I giP + 1Q
nee
I
rin
Fig. 8.6 Power flow across a short line
g.n
Also,
V 2 = VI-IZ
VI' I· = P + jQ
I = P - jQ =P- jQ
et
..... (8.1 )
..... (8.2)
V2 =VI-(p~~Qlz
Neglecting the line resistance
P Q
V 2 =V I -J' -XL--X
V V L
..... (8.4)
I I
Eqn. (8.4) is illustrated by the phasor diagram in Fig. 8.7. It can be inferred from
eqn. (8.3) or Fig. 8.7 the voltage level is influenced largely by the reactive power drop QX L ,
VJ
PX L
since the quadrature component - - does not materially affect the voltage profile (both the
VJ
drops are only small fractions of the bus voltage magnitudes).
ww
w.E V2
Fig. 8.7 Phasor representation of eqn. (8.3)
8.3 asy
Reactive Power Generation by Synchronous Machines
E
Synchronous generators are able to produce both lagging and leading vars. Over-excitation of
ngi
a generator field produces vars while under excited field causes vars to be absorbed. At lagging
power factors, the limit on var generation is imposed by either rotor heating (due to maximum
nee
excitation current limit) or by stator heating (thermal MVA loading limit of the stator) consideration.
rin
Turbine output
limit
g.n
et
Rotor
heating
limit
Generators are invariably fitted with automatic voltage regulators which maintain the
thermal voltage at its normal value by adjustment of excitation. The operating charts for salient
and non salient pole synchronous machines are shown in Fig. 8.8.
Rotor heating
limit
...
8.4
w.E
Effect of Excitation Control
Consider a synchronous machine with terminal voltage VI' The direct axis rotor angle with
a
respect to a synchronously revolving axis is 8. The voltage due to excitation acting along the
syE
quadrature axis is Eq and Eq' is the transient voltage along this axis. If a load change occurs and
the field current, If' is not changed then the various quantities mer..ioned change with P, the real
power as shown in Fig. 8.9(a).
ngi
i
00
,
8
Eq nee
>"'cr
'""
E~ rin
""
'cr
--r
VI
g.n
Fig.8.9(a)
In case the field current If is changed such that the transient flux linkages along the
et
q-axis Eq' proportional to 'P f' the field flux linkages is maintained constant, the power transfer
could be increased by 30-60% greater than in case (a) and the quantities are plotted for this
case in Fig. 8.9(b).
8
1
00
q
E~
>"'CT
VI
'""
'iT
"" --p
Fig.8.9(b)
00
i E'
q
;;:- Vt
.i:T
.,.
L.1.l
L.1.l
--P
w.E
It can be concluded that excitation control has a great role to play in power system
operation.
8.5
asy
Voltage Regulation and Power Transfer
En
If the fall of terminal voltage is assumed to be linear, then the graphs of machine terminal
voltage with load P can be represented by the relation.
gi E = Eo (\ - KP)
nee
Where Eo is the non-load terminal voltage and K is a coefficient of regulation (Fig.8.1 0).
r ing
t . net
o P(MW)--+
EV. s:
Since P =-smu
X
..... (8.5)
= Eo V sin8- Eo V KPsin8
X X
"
where 0 is the angle between E and V. Substituting Pm for T
E V
and solving for P
P= Pm sino
1+ PmKsino
which is a maximum at 0 = 90° having the value
P = Pm
max 1 K
+ Pm
under ideal conditions, where there is perfect control of excitation, K is zero.
If the machine is represented by a certain voltage E behind a certain reactance Xe then
Fig. 8.11 illustrates the effect of various types of regulators on its performance.
It can be proved for an ideal, voltage-actuated automatic regulator that the maximum
ww
value of the gain is
Xd - xd
w.E
K vmax = , ..... (8.6)
Xd
where xd and x~ are direct axis synchronous and transient reactances of the machine
respectively.
asy
There is also a minimum value for the gain to ensure stability at large load angles. For
En
better performance, forced regulation using the derivation of current and / or voltage is
recommended.
2.0
gi
The effect of different types of regulations is shown in Fig. 8.11.
nee
1.8
1.6
1.4
r ing
1.2
1.0
0.8
. net
0.6
0.4
0.2
Forced regulator xe g 0
Exciter ceiling voltage: It is defined as the maximum voltage that may be attained by
an exciter \yith specified conditions of load.
Exciter response: It is the rate of increase or decrease of the exciter voltage.
When a change in this voltage is demanded. As an example
consider the response curve shown in Fig. 8.12.
asy
En
200
gi nee
r ing
o 0.2
Seconds -+
Fig. 8.12
0.4
. net
tt: Stator
Alternatorfield
Pi/ot Exciter Main Exciter
Fig. 8.13
When the exciter is operated at rated speed at no load, the record of voltage as function
of time with a step change that drives the exciter to its ceiling voltage is called the exciter build
up curve. Such a response curve is show in Fig. 8.14.
0 To ceiling
C voltage
EFD
i
ww a d
w.E 0'----------------' e
Response ratio
E
Line ac represents the excitation system voltage response.
Cd
---p.u. V /sec ngi ..... (8.7)
Oa(O.5)
nee
Table 8.2 Typical ceiling voltages
rin
Response ratio
0.5
1.0
Conventional exciter
1.25
1.4
-
-
1.35
1.5
SCRexciter
12
1.2 - 1.25
g. net
1.5 1.55 - 1.65 1.3-1.4
2.0 1.7 - 1.8 1.45 -1.55
4.0 ... 2.0-2.1
In general the present day practice is to use 125V excitation up to IOMVA units
and 250V systems up to 100MVA units. Units generating power beyond IOOMVA have
excitation system voltages variedly. Some use 350V and 375V system while some go up to
500V excitation system.
Exciter generator
P.T
ww
w.E
Voltage
Amplifier
asy
Pilot exciter Ac Main Exciter Slip Rings Synchronous
Generator
E ngi
nee
rin
Magnetic
.--------1 Voltage
Regulator
g.
Automatic 1------'
net
Amplifier
,
Voltage and Reactive Power Control 301
Field
suppression
resistor
control
Reference
ww Thyristor network
asy Thyristor
Bridge
Synchronous Generator
En
gi nee
r ing
Fig. 8.18 AC Static-Type Excitation Systems
. net
8.9 Brushless Excitation Scheme
Generator
Field
'1000' PT
Gate control
In the brushless excitation system of Fig. 8.19, an alternator with rotating armature and
stationary field is employed as the main exciter. Direct voltage for the generator excitation is
obtained by rectification through a rotating, semiconductor diode network which is mounted
on the generator shaft itself.
Thus, the excited armature, the diode network and the generator field are rigidly connected
in series. The advantage of this method of excitation is that the moving contacts such as slip
rings and brushes are completely eliminated thus offering smooth and maintenance-free operation.
A permanent-magnet generator serves as the power source for the excitor field. The output of
the permanent magnet generator is rectified with thyristor network and is applied to the excitor
ww
field. The voltage regulator measures the output or terminal voltage, compares it with a set
reference and utilizes the error signal, if any, to control the gate pulses of the thyristor network.
w.E
A detailed brush less excitation scheme is shown in Fig. 8.20.
Ac main exciter Synchronous Generator
asy
E ngi
nee
rin
g.n
Automatic
Voltage
Regulator
The magnitude of the voltage dip is primarily determined by the transient reactance of
the machine while the duration of the dip depends on the time constant of the generator
and rapidity of regulation. Static regulators are more useful in this context as they have lesser
time delays.
The AVR which senses the terminal voltage and adjusts the excitation to maintain a
constant terminal voltage also maintains the reactive output at the required level since the latter
depends on the effective voltage difference between generator terminals and its point of
connection to the main system. Thus. while AVR is allowed to maintain the voltage on the low
voltage side, a change in reactive output to suit a change in system conditions is obtained
by tap changing a generator transformer. With several generators synchronized on a single
ww
low impedance bus section, one generator with the AVR may be permitted to maintain bus
bar voltage while the excitation of the rest are used to distribute properly the vars among
the generators.
w.E
8.11 Analysis of Generator Voltage Control
asy
+o-----------~~
En ",--...-----------0 R
Reference
voltage gi +
Ampli-
tier
nee
~--_r_-r_O
'-.L---r--'"-----I-O
Y
B
Exciter
rin
Alternator
g.n
Rectitier t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '
' - - - - - - - - - - - 1 and tilter t - - - - - - - - - - - '
Load
+
v
Vref
v Amplltier Exciter Generator
Ae A= ReAie + Le ~(Aie)
dt
ww where Aie is the change in exciter field current. If I ampere change in field current
produces K) volt change in the output, then
w.E Ae r = K)Aie
The transfer function of the exciter can be obtained as follows:
asy Ae r K)Aie
En Ae A AieRe + Le ~(Aie)
dt
gi
In the frequency domain, taking Laplace transform
nee
_~L
AEr{s) K)
=
Re
rin~ ..... (8.8)
AEA (s) Re + Le S I+S~
Re
I +STe
g.n
Hence Ge =
Ke
I +STe
is the transfer function of the exciter with the time constant
et
The value of the amplifier time constant may be of the order of 0.02 to 0.1 sec while Te
may be 0.5 to 1.0 sec for conventional machines.
At a later stage it will be shown that the exciter block is more conveniently represented
I
by in accordance with IEEE recommendation.
KE + STE
The input voltage signal Ae r to the generator field, when applied to the circuit results in
the following Kirchoff's voltage equation.
where Rf and Lff are the alternator field resistance and self inductance respectively and
flif is the change in the field c~rrent. Taking Laplace transform.
flEr(S) = (R f + LffS)fllf(S)
If the output voltage changes by fllVI then
.fi
ww L\I I' (s) =
ffiL fa
fllVI where Lfa is the mutual inductance between the field and stator
phase winding. Hence, the transfer function for the generator block will be
w.E
asy ..... (8.9)
En
where Tgf is the direct axis open circuit time constant also denoted more commonly by
TdO = Rf seconds.
LIT /
gi nee
The voltage regulator loop can be represented by the block diagram shown in Fig. 8.23.
g.n
et
Fig. 8.23 Voltage regulator block diagram
The three cascaded transfer function blocks GA' Ge and Ggf can be combined into a
single block.
so that the feed back control loop can be further simplified as in Fig. 8.24.
~IVI
~IVI
ww
The control loop must regulate the output voltage VI so that the error is made equal to zero. It
is also imperative that the response must be reasonably fast, yet not cause any instability
problem.
w.E
The steady state voltage error ,1e ss is given by
a Mss =
syE L\lvl~ef
= ,1I Vlo _
- L\ Vss
ngi
ref
G(O) ,1IVIO
1+ G(O) ref
nee
0 (i.e.) the steady state value
1+ G(O) ref
rin
= 1
1+ G(O)
,1IVlo
ref g.n
G(O)=~~ KgI' =K
(I + 0) (1 + 0) (1 + 0)
et
1
,1e ss = - - ..... (8.10)
I+K
Larger the overall gain of the forward block gain K smaller is the steady state error. But
too large a gain K can calise instability.
The response depends upon the roots of the characteristic eqn. 1 + G(S) = o.
As there are three time constants, we may write the three roots as SI' S2 and S3' A
typical root locus plot is shown in Fig. 8.25.
jro
Kc
(J
-<J S3 S2
0
SI
ww
w.E Fig. 8.25 Root - Locus Plot
From the plot, it can be observed that at gain higher than Kc the control loop
becomes llnstable.
asy
8.14 Stability Compensation for Voltage Control
En
Since at higher gains the voltage control loop tends to oscillate and even may become unstable.
gi
it requires phase lead compensation or derivative control. As there are three time constants
nee
contributing to phase lag, a phase lead compensator with transfer function.
Gc (S) = I + STc
will alter the open loop transfer function to
_ K(I + STc)
r ing
G VR (S ) - -------=----
(I + STA)(1 + STe)(1 + STgf )
Field
Error amplifier
I t - - - - j Power
L
amplifier ,.........~-r---.- 0
,-....; r--t---.--t- a
'-"'----t---t-_t_ d
Main excitor
w.E
V Ref(S)
asy
+
En
gi Fig. 8.26 (b) Block diagram
nee
Ve(S) = R f IsT(S) + L f S IsT(S)
rin
= (R f + S Lf ) IsT(S)
If the mutual inductance is M for the stabilizing transformer then, g.n
"
Taking Laplace transform
VST (t) = M ~ i,t (t)
dt . et
VST = MS 1st (S)
Hence
SM
VST(S) SM Rf
Ve(s) R f + LfS 1+ lLs
Rf
L M
Letting Rf = Tst and -R = K st
f f
Vst(S) SK
- - = - - - =st - ..... (8.12)
Ve(S) 1 + TstS
It may be noted that since the secondary of the stabilizing transformer is connected to
the input terminals of an amplifier, it draws zero current. Thus, the stabilizing transformer
improves the response of the excitation system giving derivative control.
ww
electromechanical type. Another development resulted in the use of rotating amplifiers. Magnetic
amplifiers were also used for voltage regulators.
w.E
Later versions of voltage controllers used solid state active circuits. Whatever may be
the hardware used, there was consistent effort to provide faster response, without dead band,
backlash, and absolutely reliable. Excitation systems which include voltage regulators also are
asy
classified into continuously acting type and non continuously acting type.
En
All the systems have a potential transformer and rectifier to sample the output a.c.
voltage and provide d.c. signal to the control loop.
gi
Another component is a comparator that compares the d.c. signal with reference value
and provides an error signal.
nee
An amplifier amplifies the error signal and brings it to the operational level.
rin
The exciter output is manipulated by the amplified error signal to suitably modify the
output voltage of the generator.
g.n
As a simple proportional feed back results in a steady state error, a rate feedback or
derivative control is proposed by Kron in 1954 and this was discussed in section (8.15).
3. Type 2 System: In this system rotating rectifiers are used and is brush less. Altemator-
exciter and diode rectifiers are rotating on the same shaft and hence has no slip/
rings. Being brush less, the excitation voltage (E FD) is not available for feed back. In
this there are two damping loops giving good performance.
4. Type 3 System: This type of model is evolved for systems where both current and
voltage signals are used for feed back.
5. Type 4 System: All the previously described systems are continuously acting type
with high gain and fast action. Several of the earlier systems are non continuous
acting type. [n such cases presence of dead zone results in open loop operation.
They are also slow due to friction and inertia. Rheostat systems are examples for
ww such an operation. [n type 4 systems now there are two speeds of operation
depending upon the magnitude of the voltage error. Type 4 system hence is
w.E
non-linear and as such is not represented in state variable form. Westinghouse and
General electric have developed such excitation systems.
a
8.17 IEEE Type 1 Excitation System
syE
Consider Fig. 8.27. Let V f be the voltage across the field winding and if the current through it
ngi
Afand also the flux linkages in the field winding.
consider the non-load magnetization curve shown in Fig. 8.27 for the exciter voltage
build up.
rin
I
slope of airgap
line = Rag
g.n
VexO
et
· t he saturatm
Se IS . coe ffi' A-B
JClent -B-
.
The excIter voltage v 0ex == f("Jf ' Je\
0 )
..... (8. [4)
o
. Vex S 0
If = - + eVex ..... (8.15)
Rag
..... (8.16)
ww . .... (8.17)
, ,
w.E
from eqn. (8.2)
En rf [ . 10
= -1+RagSe(lf)JVex +-o-lI.f Vex - -
d ~ ( 0) dv~x
gi Rag
nee
( p.u. ) _- ~ [1 R S (. )10 dAf{V ex ) dv ex (p.lI.)
r
Vf + ag e If JVex p.U.+
Rq ~~
ing ~
. net
A-B
Let ..... (8.19)
B
, ,
~epu (V xpu~
It .,
w.E +-____....,..._.. Em
asy
E ngi
n
Rag nee
SePLI ( \ex
Pu )
Ero=v ex p.u.
net
ww
w.E vs
~--- ~(lJ()r~N
asy I---~EFD
L...-_ _....J
E Regulator
ngi
and Exciter
nee
Fig 8.31 Connecting Power System Stabilizer
Power system stabilizer is generally shown as a feedback element from the shaft speed
and has a transfer function of the form
rin
g. net
..... (8.20)
A washout circuit for reset action is used to eliminate steady effect after a time lag To
(4 sec to 30 sec). This control circuit ensures that there is no permanent offset in the terminal
voltage due to a prolonged error in frequency. The later may occur due to prolonged over load
or islanding situation. A lead compensation pair is used at two stages with center frequencies
21n ~TIT2 and 2~ ~T3 T4 . This part of the stabilizer circuit will improve the phase lag.
A filter section is generally added as shown in Fig. 8.32 so that undesirable frequency
components are suppressed and thus eliminate the possibility of undesirable interaction. Limits
are placed so that the output signal of the PSS is prevented from driving the excitation into
heavy saturation.
The output signal of the PSS is fed as a supplementary input signal V pss for the regulation
of the excitation system. Design of the PSS circuit is beyond the scope of this book.
~
1+ sTI l+sTl K,s
1+ ST2 I + sT. I +sT"
VPSS
V x = V'l'li
}----l~ Regulator and Exciter 1----.---.
~________~ f-------~
ww
KSF
TSF
asy
The reactive power generation capability of a steam turbo-generator is dependent on the type
E
of construction.
ngi
Unit construction: In this type, where there is no steam interconnection, the generator
can absorb and produce reactive power while supplying the rated real power to the load. A
nee
reduction of active power load on the generator increases both its reactive absorption and
production capability. However, the active power scheduling is quite often based on an optimal
rin
criterion as discussed in Chapter 6, overlooking which may add to the costs. The level to
which real power loading may be reduced is mostly determined by considerations of boiler
g.
performance. Minimum permissible loadings usually fall in the range of 50 to 70% of rating.
net
Steam range construction: In the steam range construction having steam interconnection
between generators, the minimum loading constraint imposed by the boiler is of less significance
since steam from one boiler can be used to supply several generators.
As an example, iffour sets are supplied by a single boiler, then with three sets drawing
steam just for gland ceiling, maintaining vacuum and cooling while the fourth set at the partial
load, a wide range of reactive generation or absorption capability can be obtained. However,
this arrangement is not in use now.
This aspect justifies its use in certain systems even though the initial cost is high. Another
important consideration for using the synchronous compensator is the occurrence of sudden
voltage dips due to sudden short circuits or overloads.
Under such conditions the synchronous compensator performs better than other
apparatus. With additional excitation windings through which excitation can be forced
momentarily to counteract the transient effects, the synchronous compensator can even improve
stability. The synchronous compensator may be supplied from the tertiary winding of the
transformer as shown in Fig. 8.31, so that additional cost on transformer is not incurred.
8.21 Reactors
ww
Inductive reactors absorb reactive power and may be used in circuits, series or shunt connected,
While series connected reactors are used to limit fault currents, shunt reactors are used for var
w.E
control. Reactors installed at line ends and intermediate substations can compensate upto 70%
of charging power while the remaining 30% power at no-load can be provided by the under
asy
excited operation of the generator.
En 7
~IY~ Ll.y
Bus
giI
nee
~ I Bus
. net
Fig. 8.33 Shunt Reactors
With increase in load, generator excitation may be increased with reactors gradually
cut-out. Fig. 8.33 shows some typical shunt reactor arrangements.
S.22 Capacitors
Capacitors produce vars and may be connected in series or shunt in the system. Series capacitors
compensate the line reactance in long overhead lines and thus improve the stability limit.
;However, they give rise to additional problems like high voltage transients, sub-synchronous
resonance, etc. Shunt capacitors are used for reactive compensation. Simplicity and low cost
are the chief considerations for using shunt capacitor.
Further, for expanding systems additions can be made. Fig. 8.34 shows the connected
of shunt capacitors through the tertiary of a transformer.
HV~ ~p-----11 LV
Bu~ I ~ ~ Bus
Shunt capacitors In
I I I
parallel
ww Criteria
Table 8.3 Comparision of Shunt Capactor and Synchronous Condensers
Shunt capacitors Synchronous condenser
Initial cost
Losses w.E 1.0
Less than 1.5%
1.0 to 1.2
1.5 %t04 %
a
Variation of reactive
components of current
Over load
In steps only with possible
syE
surges of voltage and current
Not possible -
Continuous
rin
8.24 Tap-Changing Transformers
g.n
Tap-changing transformers with variable transformation ratio can calise substantial change in
the flow of vars. The tap-changing transformers when used in radial lines maintain voltage at
their secondary terminals or at load terminals within limits. When used in tie lines, the et
tap-changer can regulate vars substantially. In case of weaker tie lines, active power may also
change to some extent. Lastly, when used in networks or loops, circulating vars can be controlled
by tap-changing transformer.
Consider a tie line with sending end and receiving end, both having tap-changing
transformer connected to them.
Let Vs and Vr be the voltages at either end at nominal conditions.
Let ts Vs = actual voltage at sending end
and tr Vr = actual voltage at receiving end
Vs - Vr = VI _. V2 == (lR cos<P r t-IX sin<p r)
PR+QX
Hence
Vr
PR+QX
Hence ts Vs == tr Vr + V
r
To ensure that the same overall voltage prevails allover the line minimum ranac of taps
are used so that ts tr = I
Substituting this condition and solving for ts
ww
w.E
asy
t; EnII ~
gi [1 - ( PR + Q X
VI Vs
=
Vs
nee
r ing ..... (8.21 )
IN,~
LV~
Bus
If the taps on the transformers are staggered, a quadrature current circulates around the
transformers and carries additional reactive (I2X) losses. With more number of transformers
operating, the losses could be increased by this method.
ww
current in the line. This voltage drop can be obtained alternatively from the short circuit capacity
of the bus. Since R + JX is the line impedance, the voltage drop is also equal to
w.E 11 Y = (R + JX). Ir
asy = (R + JX) P - jQ
Y
= (PR En
~QX)+ {PX ~QR)
gi nee
when a three phase fault occurs at the load bus, the short circuit volt amperes into
the bus
Sse = Y . Isc = Y .
Y
Zse
r
(R + jX) ing
R+jX= -
Sse
Y" . net
y2
R cos <l>sc
Sse
y2
and X sin <l>sc
Sse
y2 y2.]1
I1Y = P-cos<l>se +Q-sm<l>se -
[ Sse Sse Y
+ J.[ P-SIl1<1>sc
y2 . Y"
-Q-cos<Pse - ]1
Sse Sse Y
It can be shown that the magnitude of voltage regulation given by I R coscp + I X sincp
PR+QX
or V as the imaginary component gives only phase shift. Hence, the real part of
E ngi
much nee
Once again, remembering that the real power does not affect the voltage magnitude
Thus
dV =dQ ..... (8.22)
V Sse
Per unit change in voltage magnitude is equal to the rate of change in reactive power to
the short circuit capacity of the bus.
It may be noted in this context that for a system with X » R, the inphase voltage drop
would be approximately equal to (I sin cpr)X, An in-phase voltage compensator or booster
would control the reactive power flow in the system. The quadrature voltage drop would be
approximately equal to (I sin CPr)' The quadrature voltage compensator would control the active
power flow in the system.
X
The ratio of R is very high for EHV and UHV lines.
.Ea
Ground clearance
Normal loading at the design and planning level is determined by loss evaluation. Any
syE
increase in line capacity with thermal consideration should also consider transformers connected
at either end also.
ngi
(ii) Dielectric limit: Line design on the basis of insulation requirement is always on the
conservative side. Line voltage can always be increased by 10% for increased
nee
power transfer. This requires proper consideration of transients and arresters in
operation.
r ing
Stability limit: There are several stability considerations for increased transmission
capability.
They are
Transient stability
Dynamic stability
. net
Steady state stability
Frequency collapse
. Voltage collapse
• Sub synchronous resonance
ww SIL = Vc MW =:0 VC
w.E J¥ Rc
asy
Power transmitted by a line is usually expressed in terms of this power. When surge
impedance is the load impedance the voltage profile of the line is flat. This is not practicable.
En
However, it is possible to modify the characteristics of the line by using such elements as
capacitors, inductors or synchronous machines. These elements can be connected in series or
gi
in parallel. Shunt compensation is similar to load compensation. Shunt connected capacitors
nee
improve the power factor, reduce the reactive power and thus increase the real power
transmission. However, this method has limitations and the size of the condenser banks increase
r
to a prohibitive level. Further they are to be switched off under Iight load conditions as otherwise
ing
the voltage rise may not be acceptable. Series compensations using capacitors cancel a part of
the line reactance and increase the maximum'power transfer. Such a compensation win reduce
.
the power angle for a given power transfer and enables increased loading. Excessive series
compensation using capacitors may result in resonance. Sub synchronous resonance at net
frequencies less than 50Hz occur with series compensation if care is not taken. This is discussed
later in the chapter.
Line compensation results in
(i) minimization of Ferranti effect
(ii) elimination of the need for under excited operation of generators and
(iii) enhanced power transfer capability
From the receiving end power circle diagram, we have
P
'IVsllVRI
= IAIIV~I
cos(/3 - 8) - - - cos(/3 - a) ..... (8.23)
R IBI IBI
with usual notation.
PR is a maximum when 0 = /3
..... (8.24)
similarly
..... (8.25)
B=Z=R+jX= ~R2+X"
w.E D = 1.0
(1=0
asy
,1=0
f3 Tan- i X/R
En
and =
gi nee
and p.s
.. max
=
~
VSVR
" R2 + X "
vi R 1
+ 0
R - + X-rin
differentiating PR.max with respective to X g.n
et
4( VR)" _I
Vs
X
In overhead lines R ratio is much greater than this optimum value needed to maintain
X
the same voltage at both the ends. For 132kV lines R ratio" is from 2.S to 3.S; for 27S kv lines
/ X
it is about 8 and for 400kv lines it is as high as 16. Hence to maintain voltage profile R ratio
has to be decreased. This can be effectively done by series capacitor compensator so that line
inductance is compensated.
ww
Nevertheless, series capacitors are to be protected against over currents and over voltages
during fault conditions.
w.E
E 8.1 Two substations A and B are interconnected by a line having an impedance of
(0.03 + jO.12) p.u the substation voltages are 33 Lt) kv and 33 LOo kv respectively. In
a
phase and quadrature boosters are installed at A. Determine their output-voltage ratings
syE
and MVA ratings in order to supply SMVA at 0.8p.f lagging at substation B.
Solution:
Let Base MVA
Base KV ngi =
33kv
SOO
nee
=
E 8.2 Two substations A and B operating at II kv 3-phase are connected by two parallel lines.
1 and 2. Each line has a 11/132 kv transformer and a 132/11 kv substation. Each line has
an equivalent impedance of ZI = 0.2 + .i0.4 and Z2 = 0.2 + jO.6 ohms per phase which
includes both the transformers and the line, referred to II kv side.
ww (a) If the bus bar A is at II kv and is sending 30Mw at 0.8 p.f leading, find the
individual currents into each transformer and the powers at the station A.
w.E
(b) If the transformer at A in line 2 is fitted with tappings on the II kv side. what
percentage tapping would be required to make each line carry equal reactive powers?
Solution: asy
What would be the power sent by line 2 in this case?
~
Engi 0.2 + j 0.4
Line I ~~
1II132KV
~
Line2
nee~~ 132111KV
A
0.2 + j 0.6
rin B
w.E 0.334
12 = 0.1386 x 1.0 L (0 ° °)
68 .43 + 36 .87 - 68 .2 = 0.41 SL32 .Ip.u. °
asy 0.334
Base current
E 37.5
r::;
'\"3 x II
3
x 10 = 1968A mpers
ngi
nee
I, =11SSL40.23° (I968xO.S87L400.23)
12 =S17L32.1O° (1968x0.41SL32°.IO)
The per unit MVA line I rin
g.n
S, = P, + jQ, = 1.00 LOo x 0.587 L-40.23° = (0.448 - jO.379) p.u.
The per unit MVA from line 2
S2
P,
=
P 1 = 16.8 MW
and P2 = 13.2 MW
The change in voltage ~V is given by the approximate expression,
~ V = ZI = PR + QX
V
= tV _ V = PR + QX
V
ww (t - I) V =
PR+QX
V
w.E (t - I) =
PR+QX
V2
asy t = 1 + PR+QX
E V
2
ngi
P = P2 = 0.352 p.u. (= 13.2 MW/37.5)
R] = 0.062 p.u.
rin
t = 1+ 0.352 x 0.062 + (- 0.3)0.186
1.00 x 1.00
g.
= 1- 0.034 = 0.966
net
percentage tap change = 96.6 - 100 = -3.4 %
Power sent through line 2
S2 = P2 + j Q 2 = (0.352 - jO.30)pu
S1 = S - S2 = (0.8 - jO.6) - (0.352 -j0.3)
= (0.448 - jO.3)p.u.
E 8.3 A load of (15 + j 10) MVA is supplied with power from a generating station from a line
at II Okv 3-phase 50Hz. The line is of 100km length. The line is represented by 1t model
with the parameters
R = 26.4 ohms
X = 33.9 ohm
B = 2!-9 x 10-6
Voltage at t~e generated in 116kv. Determine the power supplied by the generating station.
ww B/2
w.E
a syE
SR = PR + j OR
Fig. E 8.3
=
IS + jlO
3 MVA/Phase
ngi
~ = 63.5KV
VR =
nee
Reactive power through
B
2" at receiving end
rin
OCR = 63.5 x 63.5 x
219 X 10- 6
6
x 10 var g.n
= 883062.75
2
= 441531.37VAR
. .
2
= 0.44151MVAR et
Receiving end power
= (S + j 2.8918) MVA
Real power loss in the line = 12 R •
6
SR (S + j2.89I8)I0
I= - = -'--......;;,.----
VR (63.5)2 x 10 3
116
Ys == .J3 == 66.9746
ww 6
Oes == 66.9746 2 x 219x 10- x 10: == 0.491 I 72.87MYAR
w.E
Power at the sending end
2 10
gi
power consumed from the station
3 x Ss == 3 [5.218
nee
-tl j 1.9574] MYA == (15.54 + j5.8722)MYA
rin
E 8.4 A short line having an impedance of (2 + j3) ohm interconnects two power stations A
and 8 both operating at II kv; equal in magnitude and phase. To transfer 25MW at 0.8
g.n
power factor lagging from A to 8 determine the voltage boost required at plant A.
Solution:
I == 25 x 10
.J3
3
x II x 0.8
== 1640.2476L36.870
et
== 1640.2976 (0.8 - jO.6) == (1312 - j984.1486)A
voltage drop in the short line == (1312.2 - j984.1486) (2+j3)
== 2624.4 - j 1968.297 + j3936.6 + 2952-446
== 5576.8458 + j 1968.3
This voltage drop must be compensated by the booster so that the voltages are maintain
the same at both the ends
Voltage boost == (5576.85 + j 1968.3) volts.
ww The term static var compensator is applied to a number of static var compensation
devices for use in shunt reactive control.
w.E
These devices consist of shunt connected, static reactive element (linear or nonlinear
reactors and capacitors) configured into a var compensating system. Some possible
asy
configurations are shown in Fig. 8.36.
En
Even though the capacitors and reactors in Fig. 8.36 are shown connected to the low
voltage side of a down transformer, the capacitor banks may be distributed between high and
low voltage buses.
gi nee
The capacitor bank often includes, in part, harmonic filters which prevent tharmonic
currents from flowing in the transformer and the high voltage system. Filters for the 5th and
r
7th harmonics are generally provided. Fig. 8.37 shows one type of static var compensator.
ing
The thyristor controlled reactor (TCR) is operated on the low voltage bus.
net
~ HYBus
Step down
transformer
Capacitor
and filter
bank
With this transformer, the reactive power can be adjusted to anywhere between 10% to
the rated value. With a capacitor bank provided with steps, a full control range from capacitive
to inductive power can be obtained. The reactor's transformer is directly connected to the
line, so that no circuit breaker is needed.
The primary winding is star connected with neutral grollnded, suitable to the thyristor
network. The secondary reactor is normally nonexistent, as it is more economical to design
the reactor transformer with 200% leakage impedance between primary and secondary windings.
The delta connected tertiary winding will effectively compensate the triplen harmonics.
The capacitor bank is normally subdivided and connected to the substation bus bar via
one circuit breaker per subbank. The regulator generates firing pulses for the thyristor network
ww
in such a way that the reactive power required to meet the control objective at the primary side
of the compensator is obtained. The reactor transformer has a practically linear characteristic
w.E
from no load to full load condition. Thus, even under sllstained over voltages, hardly any
harmonic content is generated due to saturation. The transformer core has non ferromagnetic
·gaps to gil'e the required linearity.
asy
The following requirements are to be borne in mind while designing a compensator.
En
1. Reaction should be possible, fast or slow, whenever demanded. No switching of
capacitor should take place at that time to avoid additional transients in the system.
gi
Commutation from capacitor to reactor and vice versa should be fast.
nee
2. No switching of the capacitors at the high voltage bus bar, so that no higher frequency
transients are produced at EHV level.
r ing
3. Elimination of higher harmonics on the secondary side and blocking them from
entering the system.
.
In a three phase system the thyristor controlled inductors are normally delta
net
connected as shown in Fig. 8.39 to compensate unbalanced loads and the capacitors may be
star or delta connected.
Transmission line
HV
Bus
r rJMY~
Reactor ,
transformer
ww
w.E
asy
E
Fig. 8.39 Fixed capacitor, thyristor controlled inductor type var compensator
ngi
The use of a fixed capacitor in parallel with the controlled reactor results in the
nee
chaltacteristics shown in Fig. 8.41. The currents can be controlled to have any desired value
over the range selected from leading to lagging.
rin v
g.n
et
o
Corresponding vars are produced or absorbed. Fig. 8.41 shows the effect of changing
the oonduction angle 0 from 1800 to a small value 0c-
The current flowing in the inductance would be different in each half cycle, varying
with the .conduction angle such that each successive half cycle is a smaller segment of a sine
wave. The fundamental component of inductor current is then reduced to each case. Quick
control can be exercised within one half cycle, just by giving a proper step input to the firing
angle control
332 ~
Operation and Control in Power
62
Systems
Block diagram representation of a static var compensator is given in Fig. 8.42. The net
change in the reactor current IR drawn by the static var compensator supplied through the
i1 V 1
system impedance Zs =
i1! I
v v
~--
/
ww
/
/
w.E +-(Lead)
Applied voltage
(Lag) -+ +-(Lead) (Lag) -+
asy
E ngi
nee
Reactor currents
rin
Fig. 8.41 Effect of conduction angle on reactor currents
g.
Following an instantaneous change in firing angle e, the admittance BL of the inductor
and therefore the current, 'I will settle down to a new value in about one cycle or less. The net
impedance Zs is the entire system impedance viewed by the compensator. The thyristor
controlled reactor can be represented by the transfer function
\ e- ST1
GR(S)=--
1 +T2S
where TI and T] are of the order I ms and 4 ms. For practical purposes, the compensator
can be assumed to have a pure gain of unity with the present thyristor technology. The AVR
can be represented by
Transformer
Fig. 8.42 Block diagram of static var compensator
ww V-E (2a-sin2a) E
w.E
j = -jX- : E=CY. C = --2-n---'-
asy
Static var compensators when installed reduce the voltage swings at the rolling mill and
En
power system buses in drive system applications. They compensate for the average reactive
power requirements and improve power factor.
gi
Electric arc furnaces impose extremely difficult service requirements on electrical power
nee
systems since the changes in arc furnace load impedance are rapid. random and non symmetrical.
The three phases of a static var compensator can be located independently so that
r ing
it compensates for the unbalanced reactive load of the furnace and the thyristor controller
will respond quickly in order to minimize the voltage fluctuations or voltage flicker seen by
.
the system.
Lme net
Furnace
Magnetic interface
Thus, the furnace characteristics are made more acceptable to the power system by the
static var compensator. Fig. 8.44 shows the application of the static var compensator to an arc
furnace installation for reactive power compensation at the HV bus level.
ww The first occurs with the first cycle or two after the load rejection takes place. The
second type, dynamic in nature, may last a few seconds and is caused by higher machine
internal voltages and over speed. This type is, to a large extent influenced by the existing
w
conditions before the load rejection takes place, the type of voltage regulator and the
.Ea
compensating devices. The magnitude of the first type can be determined from:
I. The constant flux linkage voltage in the equivalent circuit of the rotor direct and
quadrature axes.
syE
2. The voltage rise components across the transient reactances of the two axes due to
line-charging current.
ngi
The second type of over voltage can be computed from the relation.
r ing
where
Es is the sending end voltage
E'(t) the voltage behind transient reactance as a function of time
. net
Qc' the reactive MVA generation of the line at rated voltage and frequency and,
SC' the short circuit MVA for fault at sending end (based on transient reactance).
If the rejected load forms a large portion of the total load there will be a rise in frequency,
Qc and E!(t) and decrease of Sc with a cumulative effect to increase the overvoltage.
To avoid self excitation: the line reactive generation should be within
_ O.9Pn
Qc - ? ..... (8.29)
n-(Xd+X t )
where n is the over speed in p.u.,
Xt the transformer reactance in p.lI.
Xd the direct axis reactance in p.u. and
Pn the nominal MVA of the generating capacity at the sending end.
If the excitation system has negative field current capability and AVR is provided then
ww
is performed on the transformer secondary at the receiving end. Due to voltage increase, the
transformer gets over excited and then saturated with subsequent injection of harmonic voltages
w.E
into the system. Then, with some combination of system inductance and line capacitance, due
to Ferro resonance, extremely high voltage will be produced for 0.5 to LOs, resulting in
equipment damage.
a syE
Shunt reactor compensation is quite effective in limitings the over voltages due to
load rejection. Such compensation has given 50% reduction in over voltages for line to
ground faults.
ngi
When synchronous compensator is installed, it automatically absorbs the reactive power
nee
from the system which is a function of the compensator reactance and interval voltage.
rin
The time constant of the machine, however, limits the rate at which the compensator
inductive current can be increased. The static var compensator on the other hand can change
g.n
over to its maximum current in the inductive range very rapidly since the compensator output
increases as the square of the voltage. Further, the overload capacity of the static var
et
compensator in the inductive range can be increased at additional costs much lower than those
required for synchronous compensators.
(~)
ww
15th harmonic = 260 = 13.0 A
100
asy
Filter for fifth harmonic
I
ro ==---
En
At resonance
n ~LFCF
gi
The impedance offered by filter circuit at power frequency is
l-ro 2 L FC F
nee
roC F
rin
1
and this should be much greater than the impedance offered by CM which is -CM, i.e.
0)
g.n
et
we require
l-ro 2 L FC F > _1_
roC F - roC M
Let this be greater be 20 times the value
1
C F == (nroY LF
2
LF = 1316 xOIO- 6 x31421x24 ==0.OO643H
1
C F == , ~ == 0.00006303 == 63.03J.LF
(5 x 314)- x 6.43 x 10-'
I
nro = ----;::==
~LFCF
w.E LF =
20
6 7
1316xlO- (314)- x48
= 0.000 16H = O. 16mH
Therefore, asy CF =
I
,=0.001284F=1284f.lF
En
7'
(7x314t xO.16IxI0-
gi
8.34 Subsynclrronous Resonance
nee
Series capacitor compensation is the most technically feasible and economically viable choice
rin
for increasing the transmission capability ofEHV power systems. However, series compensation
brings in certain problems related to dynamic performance of the system. One such problem
g.n
is sub synchronous resonance. It is an electrical system condition where the electrical system
exchanges energy with a turbine-generator at one or more frequencies below the synchronous
frequency of the system. This interchange may be a Iittle damped or undamped.
et
The exchange of energies takes place at the natural frequencies of the respective systems.
For the electrical system, the natural frequencies are higher compared to the mechanical system.
The range lies between 15Hz and 45Hz for steam turbo generator whereas it is 10Hz and below
for a hydro generator. For the electrical system, the modes of oscillation depend upon the
number of circuit configurations that can be made through switching. Depending on the system
operating conditions and mechanical moment of inertia, the electromechanical system has a
frequency of oscillation between I and 2 Hz.
There are three types of sub synchronous oscillations that have been identified. The
apparent negative resistance (rotor resistance viewed from armature terminals) characteristic
of the generator at sub synchronous frequencies causes the generator to act as an induction
generator and this effect is called the induction generator effect. If this negative resistance
exceeds the network resistance for a specific combination of inductance and capacitance, self
excitation may result anhe resonant frequency.
Resonance may take place due to the torsional interaction between electrical and
mechanical systems. This may occur when the electrical resonance frequency is near the
complement of the torsional resonant frequency of the turbo-generator shaft system (the
difference of synchronous frequency and the turbine mechanical natural frequency is the
complement of the torsional resonant frequency).
A small voltage induced in the armature by rotor oscillation under these conditions can
result in large sub synchronous currents. This current will produce oscillatory component of
rotor torque and if the mechanical damping is small, the electromechanical system may
experience growing oscillations.
ww Finally, when the transmission system contains a series capacitor, the transient electrical
torque, under fault or switching operations, may contain large amplitude frequency components
w.E
close to resonant frequency of the shaft system. This can result in high shaft torques which
may be seriously damage the turbo generator units.
asy
Consider a series compensated transmission system, let L1, Lg and Lt be the inductances
of the line, generator and transformers respectively and let Cs be the series capacitance then
the resonant frequency.
En
gi nee
otherwise,
r ing
=(j)
s
~c
X
L . net..... (8.30)
where fs is the rated frequency; Xc and XL are the capacitive and inductive reactances
calculated at the rated frequency. Since the compensation is generally less than 100% from
eqn. (8.30) it can be seen that the resonant frequency is always less than the rated frequency.
Several methods are suggested to prevent sub synchronous resonance. One technique
is the use of filtering and damping. A blocking filter may be inserted in series with the generator
step-up transformer.
Otherwise, an appropriately designed reactor may be connected in parallel with an existing
series capacitor to form a blocking filter. Other types of filters are also suggested in literature.
Relays are also used to detect excessive mechanical system. System switching method can
also be implemented to avoid sub synchronous resonance. When a system configurations
occurs which can the generator can be isolated from the series capacitances that create
problems. This is accomplished by switching the machine off from the compensated system
and switching on to an uncompensated line. Unit tripping also can be implemented if all
conditions that cause transient torques are completely predetermined.
E 8.5 A load of (66 + j60) MVA at the receiving end is being transmitted via a single circuit
220KV line having a resistance of 21 ohm and reactance of 34 ohm. The sending end
" voltage is maintained at 220kV. The operating conditions of power consumers require
that at this load voltage drop across the line should not exceed 5%. In order to reduce
voltage drop standard single phase 660V, 40 kVAR capacitors are to be switched in
series in each phase of the line. Determine the required number of capacitors, and rated
voltage neglect the losses.
Solution:
Three phase load = (66 + j60) MVA
66 + j60
w.E
The impedance Z = R + jX = (21 + j34) ohm
asy
Without series capacitor
P fj
En = 22 x 21 + 20 x 34 = 8.9907KV
gi
6. V == PRR + OR X
5% of 127.02
127.02
nee
== 462 + 680
127.02
== -
5
x 127.02 = 6.351kV
rin
g.n
100
Let Xc be the capacitive reactance to bring down the drop from 8.9907kV to 6.351 kV
6.351 = PRR+(X-XC)QR
VR
22x21+20(34- X d
127.02
et
Solving for Xc
Xc = 16.65 ohm
Given that 40kVAR capacitor at 0.66kV are to be switched.
= 234.07 = 3.862
n 60.606
Vc 660V
Xc =- = = 10.890hm
Ie 60.606A
w.E
Since total Xe has to be 16.65 ohm
asy
The series units ns will be
10.89 x ns = 16.65
4
En
Hence n
s 10.89 gi
= 16.65 x 4 = 6.1157
nee
As ns must be a whole number n,
Installed capacity of the capacitor bank
= 7
r ing
Qc
=
= Rated voltage of the capacitor bank
0.66 kV x 7 == 4.62 kV . net
E 8.6 Find the capacity of a static VAR compensator to be installed at a bus with ± 5% voltage
fluctuation. The short circuit capacity == 7000MVA.
Solution:
i1Q == capacity of the compensator
Sse == Short circuit capacity
i1 V == Voltage fluctuation
i1 V = i1Q
Sse
i1Q == i1 V . Sse == ± 0.05 x 7000 == ± 350 MVAR
Capacity of the static VAR compensator = ± 350 MVAR
E 8.8 A 400kV line is fed through a 132!400kV transformer from a constant 132kV supply. At
the load end of the line another transformer of nominal ratio 400!132kV is used to
reduce the voltage. The total impedance of the line and transformers at 400kV is (50+j 100)
ohm. Both, transformers are equipped with tap changing so arranged that the product
of the off nominal setting is unity. If the load on the systems is 250MW at 0.8 p.f
lagging. Calculate the settings of the tap changer required to maintain the voltage of the
load bus at 132kY.
ww 132/400
Solution:
a syE
ngi
Power per phase (P) = 250 = 83.33MW
3
nee
rin
250 0.6
Reactive power per phase = - x - = 62.5MVAR
0.8 3
132
VR = VS = -Jj = 76.21247 kV 76.21247 g.n 103 V
et
= x
we have
132
V =V = -kV
R S Jj
ww
w.E
------=-----
1 _ 4166.5 + 6250 1_~6.5
53333.333 53333.333
1 - 0.1953093
- - - = 1.2427136
0.8046906
ts = I
En
1.1147706
= 0.8970455
gi nee
r ing
. net
Questions
I. Discuss in detail about the generation and absorption of reactive power in power system
components.
2. Explain reason for variations of voltages in power systems and explain anyone method
to improve voltage profile.
3. Explain clearly what do you mean by compensation ofline and discuss briefly different
wwmethods of compensation.
w.E
types of static compensators.
asy
5. Explain with diagrams, the operation of a fixed capacitor and thyristor controlled reactor.
6. Discuss in detail about the generation and absorption of reactive power in power system
components.
E ngi
7. Discuss in detail about the generation and absorption of reactive power system
components.
nee
8. Describe the effect of connecting series capacitors in the transmission system.
Problems
P 8.1 Find the regulation and efficiency of an SO-lan, 3-phase, 50-cis transmission line delivering
24,000 kVA at a power factor ofO.Slagging and 66kV to a balanced load. The conductors
are of copper, each having resistance 0.12 ohm per km, 1.5 c, outside diameter, spaced
equiIaterally 2.5m between centers. Neglect leakance and use the nominal-7t method.
P 8.2 A 3-phase, overhead line has resistance and reactance of 6 and 20 ohm respectively per
phase. The sending end voltage is 66kV while the receiving end voltage is maintained at
66kV by a synchronous phase-modifier. Determine the kVAr of the modifier when the
load at the receiving end is 75MW at power factor 0.8 lagging; also the maximum load
w.E
P 8.3 A long line from a hydroelectric station operating at 132kV feeds a 66kV system through
a transformer. The load taken from the 66kV windings of the transformer is 50MVA at
power factor O.S lagging. A tertiary winding on the transformer feeds a synchronous
asy
condenser at II kV. If the power factor at the receiving end of the line is to be unity,
calculate the rating of each of the three windings. Neglect losses.
En
P 8.4 Find the rating of synchronous compensator connected to the tertiary winding of a
gi
132kV star connected, 33kV star connected, Ilk V delta connected three winding
nee
transformer to supply a load of 66MW at O.S power factor lagging at 33kV across the
secondary. Equivalent primary and tertiary winding reactances are 32 ohms and 0.16
r
ohm respectively while the secondary winding reactance is negligible. Assume that the
ing
primary side voltage is essentially constant at 132kV and maximum of nominal setting
between transformer primary and secondary is I: I.
. net
P 8.S A single circuit three phase 220kV line runs at no load. Voltage at the receiving end of
the line is 21 OkV. Find the sending end voltage, if the line has resistance of 20.5 ohms,
reactance of 81.3 ohms and the total susceptance as 5.45 x 10-4 mho. The transmission
line is to be represented by 7t-model.
P 8.6 A )ower system is operating at 1000Mw, 132kV, 50Hz, with O.S p.f. lagging in parallel
with another line at 750MW, I 32kV, 50Hz with 0.707 p.f. lagging. Both are interconnected
at the station and when the compensating device is on, the overall power factor is
improved to 0.9 lagging. Suggest suitable capacitors, shunt and series. Individual loads
and combined load are to improve power factor to 0.9 in all c~ses.
ww
9 w .Ea TO
INTRODUCTION
ADVANCEDsTOPICS
yE
ngi
nee
Modern power systems with super power plants are highly complex and sophisticated with
r
huge capital investment. Further, advanced technologies are used in the design and operation
ing
of these systems. For efficient and reliable operation of these systems, control action is
envisaged with the following organs:
I.
2.
3.
Data acquisition and control
Computers,
Man - machine interface, and
. net
4. Software and human operators.
During the earlier days, control action was appl ied to generation dispatch and supervisory
control. Modern systems demand a comprehensive and integrated approach to monitoring and
controlling of power flows for economic and secure operation. This brought into the picture
a third and equally important aspect of control, viz, security control. The human operator is
finding it more and more difficult to take instantaneous decisions in cases of serious and
complex situations.
Generation control has slowly shifted from analog to digital methods during the sixties.
Station and system supervisory control too has shifted to digital computer masters from hard-
wired masters. The man - machine interface consisted of strip chart records, loggers, indicating
lights, anunciators, console push button panels, etc. Black and white or colour CRT display is
already in vogue. However, the entire control configuration has undergone a radical change
with the introduction of system security requirements.
ww Line I
asy Line 2
En
gi Fig. 9.1 Transfer of Power
nee
The power flow from the generator to the load through the parallel lines is dependent
r
upon the impedances or reactances when resistances are neglected. If Xl = X2 ' the transfer
ing
of power is 50% on each of the two lines. If X2 = 2X I then the p.ower transfer will be in the
ratio of 2 : I. Thus the higher impedance line carries less load and the lower impedance line
. net
may even get over loaded. If one of the lines, say line 1 is a HYDC line then power flow is
electrically controlled and the above problem is eliminated. Further, with HYDC the stability
problem also is controlled because of the speed of control. However, HYDC is expensive in a
relative sense.
A FACTS controller can over come the problem discussed earlier by controlling the
impedance, or phase angle. A FACTS controller can control the power flow in any manner
that is desired. It is possible to inject desired voltage in series with the line.
H~
Line
ww
combination connected in shunt as shown and they all inject current into the line (Fig. 9.3).
w.E Line
fasy
En
gi nee
Fig. 9.3 Shunt Controller
. net
wherein series controllers provide independent series reactive power control as well provide
real power transfer through a power link. This is shown in Fig. 9.4.
I l A. C. Line 1
~
I I
D. C. Power link for real
power exchange
A. C. Line :2
I ~
l
I I
In FACTS terminology the term unified is used to indicate that the D.C. terminals of all controller
converters are connected together fm real power transfer.
-v--.
Line
asy
Fig. 9.5 Series - Shunt Controllers
En
There are two types of converters - voltage sourced and current sourced, using gate turn off
gi
devices. The voltage sourced converter consists of a gate turn off device paralleled with a
reverse diode. A D.C. capacitor is used as a voltage source. The current sourced converter
nee
has a gate turn off device in series with a diode. It has a D.C. reactor as a current source.
Voltage sourced converters are preferred in FACTS controllers. Sequential switching
r ing
of the device will give A.C. voltage from the D.C. source. They are called thus static synchronous
compensator. It is operated as a shunt connected static var compensator whose output voltage
. net
can be controlled independent of A.C. system voltage. Such a device is also called STATCOM.
The structure is shown in Fig. 9.6.
o
Fig. 9.6 Static Synchronous Compensator
ww Likewise, thyristor switched capacitor (TSC) is operated such that shunt capacitor
units are switched in - and out depending upon the need. It should be noted that in this case
w.E
the thyristors are operated without firing angle control. They operate with full or zero conduction.
A thyristor controlled resistor (TCBR) with shunt connection can be use to brake a
asy
generator during accelerating period when a fault occurs. They are called then thyristor controlled
braking resistors.
En
In the same way as STATCOM a static synchronous series compensator (SSSC) operates
with a voltage sourced converter or current sourced converter giving output voltage in series
gi
with the line. Thyristor controlled series reactor (TCSR) thyristor controlled series capacitor
nee
(TCSC) thyristor controlled switched series reactor (TSSR) are similar devices in series mode
of operation.
flow of active power between both the series output terminals of the SSSC and the shunt net
SSSC). They are coupled through a common D.C. link. The controller permits bi-directional
output terminals of the STATCOM. Without any external electric energy source they provide
simultaneously real and reactive series line compensation.
UPFC is also capable of providing independently controllable shunt reactive compensation.
This is schematically shown in Fig. 9.7.
There are several more devices such as thyristor controlled phase shifting transformer
(TCPST), inter phase power controller (lPC) Thyristor controlled voltage limiter, thyristor
\
controlled voltage regulator etc.
----~~------------~~~------
Line
~ ~
I
sssc
0
ww
w.E D. C. Link
=}=
0 Statcom
En
4. Up gradation of lines is easier.
5. Reduced reactive power flow, thereby permitting greater active power flow.
nee
r
Voltage stability is an integral part of the power system response and is an important aspect of
ing
system stability and security. Voltage instability has been detected well before the onset of
angle instability in many cases. If the problem is not corrected it can lead to voltage collapse
and system wide disturbance.
. net
The loss of synchronism of generators is called angle instability. Voltage stability also
called load stability is a subset of overall stability of a power system and is a dynamic problem
that occurs due to monotonically changing voltages.
In industrialized areas increase of load demand is met without a corresponding increase
in transmission capacity leading to severe problem including voltage stability.
Voltage stability is the ability to maintain the voltage so that when load is increased load
power will increase and so both power and voltage are controllable.
A power system at a given operating state and subjected to a given disturbance is voltage
stable ifvoltage near loads approaches post disturbance equilibrium values. Following voltage
stability, a system undergoes voltage collapse if the post disturbance equilibrium voltages near
loads are below acceptance limits. Both voltage stability and collapse may occur in a time
period of a fraction of a second to a few minutes.
Consider the plot of voltage V at a load bus as a function of load power P shown in
Fig. 9.8 as ABCDE.
v
A _" B
v I '1---- ---,
, C
- - --i - - )Nose pomt
1/1
1/ 1
v
)/iu
Yo 1
1
//
~------~--~~-------- P
ww E PeR
Fig. 9.8 P. V. Diagram at the Load Bus
w.E
It can be observed that there are two voltages Y I and Y2 for a constant power load. The
high voltage solution is stable while the other is unstable. The maximum loadability is determined
a
by point C and the part CDE is uncontrollable.
VS~-----,---VR~
R+j:-.
syE
ngi
I ...
Line l.oad
P +.IQ
nee
Fig. 9.9 Transmission Line with load
r i +Q2)]g
Mathematically the voltage YR can be expressed by (see Fig. 9.9).
/
08 (load)
L -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ P
E Power
Static analysis is sufficient to assess voltage stability, but for accurate prediction dynamic
analysis must be carried out.
The probability of voltage instability increases as the system is operated close to its
maximum loadability limit. Environmental and economic expansion of transmission network
and for obvious reasons distant location of the generators from the load centers all result in
over loading of the existing networks. The present trend is to optimally utilize the inher\!nt
margins available with flexible A.C. transmission system controllers.
Reactive power compensation close to the load centers as well as at the critical buses in
the network is essential to over come voltage instability.
ww The location size and speed of control of FACTS controllers determine the maximum
benefit that can be obtained without getting into voltage instability.
9.3
w.E
Power Quality
Any amount of power can be drawn from and delivered to an infinite bus without affecting
a syE
(i) the magnitude of bus voltage
(ii) the frequency of bus voltage.
ngi
The short circuit ratio at a load bus (SCR) is defined as
SCR = Short circuit current at rated voltage with load short circuited
nee
rated load current
It can be seen that SCR is iaversely proportional to the Thevenin's impedance of the
rin
network as seen from the bus. If SCR is low the load bus is said to be connected to weak
power grid and vice versa. Power quality (PO) problem is likely to occur at that bus. One
aspect of PO can be selected in terms of phase voltages V R' V) and V B as
1
g.n
[
V
V: =
sin rot
J2 V sin( rot - 231£ ) et
..... (9.2)
VB (2 )
sin rot + 31£
under all conditions, V and ro remaining constant. Similarly the harmonic content of the
bus voltage is also an indication of PO.
Electric power quality can be loosely defined as a measure of how well electric power
can be utilized by customers.
Power utilization is degraded when wave shapes are irregular, voltage regulation is
poor, harmonics and flicker are present or even when there are momentary events that distort
the usually sinusoidal voltage wave. All the above conditions result in degradation of
power quality. The introduction and the wide spread use of high power semi conduction
devices at all levels of power system operation, and utilization have made non sinusoidal load
currents quite co~mon.
ww In regard to frequency, high frequency phenomenon is termed noise and the low frequency
phenomenon is named flicker. As has been already mentioned rectifier loads are the main
w.E
source of harmonic load current.
Oifferent rectifier connections such as single phase bridge and 3-phase bridge rectifiers
contribute to harmonic distortion and various factors such as THO, displacement factor, power
asy
factor are clearly defined. It may be noted that displacement factor is the cosine of the angle
between fundamental voltage and fundamental current while, power factor is the ratio of real
or active power to apparent power V RMS JRMS '
En
9.3.2 Voltage Sags
gi nee
A short duration magnitude reduction in voltage is called voltage sag. The time period may be
of the order of few seconds. The cause for a sag is sudden, short duration increase in current.
r
Such an event occurs during motor starting, transformer energizing, faults etc.'
ing
For example, the transient voltage when a big motor is started will have the shape of all
.
the phase voltages shown in Fig. 9.11. The voltage falls by a large amount with gradual recovery
over a few cycles.
200
net
215
.,
~
210
'"Cl
C>()
~
.0
~
205
~
~
195
190
0 2 3 11
Time (Cycles)
It can be seen that the voltage drops are practically the same in all the three phases. In
case of magnetizing inrush current of transformers, the inrush current is not the same in all the
phases. This is shown in Fig. 9.12 second harmonic and fourth harmonics contribute more to
harmonic distortion.
II
10.9
10.8
10.7
~
ww ~
(l)
~
10.6
10.5
w.E
[/J
:::E
ex:
10.4
10.3
asy 10.2 -
10.1 .
En
10
0 5 10 15- 20 25
gi
Time (Cycles)
nee
Fig. 9.12 Voltage sag due to transformer energizing
rin
In case of faults, the most common type of fault is single line to ground fault. The
voltage falls more in two phases and recovers sharply after a few cycles. This is shown in
Fig. 9.13 the most severe faults are due to short circuits and faults involving earth.
g.n
11.5
II
et
~
10.5
>
(l)
~ 10
~[/J
:::E 9.5
ex:
8.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (Cycles)
ww
supplies. The switch mode power supply converts the unregulated D.C. link voltage to a well
regulated output voltage. For higher power applications (greater than 1 KW) either 3-phase
bridge of six pulse type or twelve pulse type are used. The single phase case is shown in Fig.
w.E
A.C asy
mains
En SMPS Output
gi nee
Fig. 9.14 Single phase rectifier load
9.14. rin
g.n
The voltage sag depends upon the energy storage device used and the switch mode
power supply (SMPS). If the sag in the A.C. main voltage is of considerable magnitude and
duration, the D.C. link voltage may fall below the minimum value for which it is desired. This
results in the shut down of the .electronic load connected to the output termals of SMPS. et
9.3.4 Flicker
Light flicker perception is said to be a physiological process in which the eye and the brain
participate. Voltage fluctuations occur due to mainly electric arc. furnace loads. These occurs
because of voltage and current harmonics due to inherent non -linearity of the arc characteristic.
Light flicker is caused mainly due to reactive power flow from the system at the instant of
short circuit created by the arc. Any step taken in regard to control of reactive power will
control light flicker. Furnaces' of ratings about I OOMVA and above cause the problem.
Again when wind turbines are connected to system they are frequently switched on and
off around the cut - in speed then voltage fluctuations occurs.
Another major source for harmonics in addition to electronic loads is adjustable speed
drives as they use diodes, SCRs, power transistors, switches etc to chop wave forms to
control power.
Total harmonic distortion of voltage less than 5%' is acceptable but THO above 10%
requires, positive steps to reduce the harmonics.
ww
Technology Industry Council (ITIC) announced its power acceptability curve which superceded
CBEMA curve. This is shown in Fig. 9.15.
w.E 250r---~~--~--------------------~
~
Q)
:0) En
f50 ............................. '1' ...... "' .......................... ,............................
50 ............................. =0
:!O gi nee
·T..........· · . · ·. . ·....·........ · ........ . ·'·· . · . ·.
~
.!:
~
g>
tI1
o Acceptable
Power
~;BR~at~ed!L======::!:===~
]Volta~ge::...._.]""":;~--'
r ing
..c::
U
I'-----r---' (Jj;
E:
-50 ............................ ~; ....... ·....r·..""'.. ;,,;,,:
~i
.. ·.:..:.;·"~
.. ·;...
....;
.
.. ;..::·~"'--......;.;.;.;..:..:..:..;.;:.;,
.. ·.;...·..""'
Undervoltage Conditions net
-100L-O-.O-O~01~O.-OO-1-=O~.O-1~~O.=1===1====1=O===1=OO==~1000
Time (Seconds)
VSource
ww
w.E Fig. 9.16 Dynamic Voltage Restorer
Point of Common Coupling (PCC) is the point in the inter connected power system
asy
where loads are connected to the network. It is the point at which the load interacts with loads
and the network itself. For example the pec for typical residential applications is the distribution
En
transformer secondary. Where the distribution transformer serves a single customer, the
gi
primary of the transformer is the PCe.
vpee = V, (t) + VDVR (t)
nee
The DVR will maintain near perfect power quality conditions at the PCe. The DVR is
..... (9.4)
ww Meters for measuring watts, vars and volts can be placed at generator buses, EHV lines,
tie - lines and load buses and the readings can be telemetered in real time to the control centers.
w.E
However, only some of the measurements are available immediately while the rest are
either delayed as is the case ofinformation from a neighbouring, interconnected system or not
asy
available (like data from the low voltage distribution side). Further, the available data may not
be perfect due to errors in the meters. Some of the meter readings may also be missing.
En
Let n be the dimension of the state vector X and m be the dimension of the measurement
vector Z. Since the slack bus is fixed, we have Nb voltage magnitudes and (Nb-I) voltage
gi
phase angles where Nb is the number of buses.
XT = [Vi' V 2' ..... VNb ' 82
nee
..... 8 Nb ] ..... (9.5)
r
Knowing X, all other quantities like active and reactive power flows, line flows, etc can
be computed. In practice, all the values of X cannot be directly metered. The measurement
vector Z and the state vector X are related by the nonlinear equation. ing
Z = h(X) + 11
where h is the measurement noise. By exercising option in the selection of variables for
metering. Five types of measurement vectors can be identified.
. net
.. ... (9.6)
Case I Measuring real an,d reactive powers PI and Q I at all nodes, except P, at the
swing bus.
ZT = [P 2, P3, ..... PNb' Q, ..... QNb]
and it is a (2 Nb - I) dimensional vector.
PI and Q I are given by equation (2.11) and (2.12)
Case 2.' Real and reactive powers at all buses except Pi at slack bus and voltage
_ magnitudes at all buses may be measured in which case
ZT = PNb ' Q I ..... QNb Vi .... · V Nb ]
[P 2 .....
ZT - [P
IJ'
0]
IJ
Modelling of uncertain(v:
w.E
Gaussian distribution is assumed for mathematical modelling of the uncertainty in measurements .
so that the optimal estimates X is obtained. In practice, three cases may arise.
Case I : m > n; the estimated equations are
..... (9.12)
The estimate covariance matrix is
w.E
The noise covariance matrix
Nx = E (1111 T) ..... (9.14)
asy
The number of basic arithmetic operations required for the computation of the optimum
estimate area of the optimum estimate are of the order ofmn'. The difficulty in this case is that
En
the maximum Rx tends to be singular making inversion difficult.
Case 2: m = n: The estimation equations are
gi
X = A-I Z
nee
..... (9.15)
..... (9.16)
r
In this case, the computational problems are fewer since A is a square non singular
matrix and Rx is determined from
R, = A-I N(ATt l ing
. net
Case 3: m < n; while an estimate of 11 can be determined in principle, he estimate is
neither unique nor does it have much relevance to state estimation in power systems.
The above classification of the states of the power system will facilitate in distinguishing
between the different types of controls to be applied to the system. It can now be stated that
the objective of system security control is to keep the power system in normal mode of
operation and prevent it from entering into either emergency or restorative mode.
The system state is continuously assessed via data acquisition systems making use of
telemetered data, redundant data and by predicting the missing or doubtful data whenever a
metering channel becomes erroneous or its accuracy is beyond the normal specified range.
This job is referred to as security monitoring.
During security assessment, a series of fast computations are made to examine the
effect of various credible contingencies and those that are not so. If some of the assumed
ww
contingencies result in unsatisfactory performance from the point of view of security, a corrective
strategy is called for, to determine the best corrective action either by special calculations
within the computer or from results obtained from off-line studies.
w.E
Continuous monitoring for security and sending command signal for corrective action
whenever necessary is 'referred to as security control.
asy
Steady state security analysis is performed to determine whether there will be a new
steady state operating point at which the system will settle after the post-fault oscillations have
En
been damped out. The post contingency steady-state solution will have to be checked for
violation of operational constraints. If it violates the constraints, the contingency is declared to
gi
be insecure and necessary corrective action is to be initiated.
nee
Steady state security may be defined as the ability of the system to operate steady-
state-wise within the specified limits of safety and supply, following a contingency in the time
r ing
period, after the fast acting automatic Control devices have restored the system balance, but
before the slow-acting controls like transformer tappings, human decisions, etc, have responded.
.
For steady state security analysis the following contingencies may be considered:
I. Loss of a generating unit
2. Sudden loss of a load,
net
3. Sudden change in flow in an inter-tie,
4. Outage of a transmission line,
5. Outage of a transformer, and
6. Outage of a shunt capacitor or reactor.
The outage may be either network outage or power outage. Fast and decoupled load
flows are employed for security analysis of systems.
ww u
·1
F (X. R d)
f
• X
asy
Eqn. (9.14) and
bus system. There are
Fig. 9.17 correspond to 2n real nonlinear power equations for any n-
2n bus power injections (n-real power and n-reactive power) which
may be denoted by the
bus impedance matrix, Envector S. The network parameters are given by the bus admittance or
designated by P.
gi
The steady state security assessment problem is concerned with the analysis of the
nee
system described by the vector triplet (X, S, P). Given a base triplet (Xo, so, pO) along with
contingency details,
pI, i = I, 2, ...... , nw;
SI, i = nw + I, ....... nw + pO r ing
is then required to determine the post-contingency states.
XI' i = I, 2, ....... , (nw + po)
. net
where nw is the number of network outages and po is the number of power outages, it
The steady state security assessor is a computer program that determines the post-
contingency states. The program is also interlinked with several other programs at the computer
control center.
B'~b == ~p
IVI
..... (9.18)
so that ..... (9.19)
The outage of a line (neglecting charging capacitance) joining buses i and j can be
reflected in K by modifying two elements in row i and two in row j. The new outage matril'
can be presented as
K' = [K + BA AT] ..... (9.20)
where B is the line susceptance and
A is a column vector with AI = + I and AI = -I and zeroes in other locations.
asy
The solution vector
yl = K'-IC ..... (9.24)
En
gives the post-outage state of the system.
gi
Complete system security involves the following:
nee
I. System prediction: This is done by computer programs that predict the system load
conditions in advance for a predetermined time interval (say, an hour or day),
r
2. System contingency evaluation: This involves programs that detertninethe state of
ing
the system consequent to generation, line or transformer outages.
3. System corrective strategy This is aimed at taking all possible decisions to keep the
. net
system in steady state secure condition. It also involves the necessary steps to be
taken to overcome both unexpected and anticipated problems, either in the present
state of operation or in future:
4. Automatic control: This eliminates the necessity of the operator taking initiative for
all corrective actions.
Pattern Vector
Each operating condition ofa power system is determined by real and reactive power generation,
line flows, loads voltage and voltage magnitudes and phase angles. All these variables from
measurements constitute the compollents of a pattern vectur X = (XI' x~ ..... , xn ).
Training Set
Every conceivable operating condition of the system gives rise to a corresponding pattern
vector. The set of all possible pattern vectors constitutes the training set.
Pattern Classification
Each of the patterns belonging to the training set are classified as either secure or insecure
through off-line studies. Secure patterns contain all operating conditions that are secure while
insecure ones contain such conditions in system operation that are insecure.
Feature Extraction
ww
The actual number of variables used for representing an operating condition may be too many.
w.E
But in practice, only a few of them may considerably influence the security of the pattern. It is
desired to select a relatively small number of such variables called feature variables and the
process of selection is called feature extraction. Feature extraction can be simplified by applying
asy
operational experience and engineering judgment in addition to any statistical criterion.
E
The feature vector is defined by
F = (fp f2' .......
ngi
~n); m< n ..... (9.25)
All variables that are redundant may be removed from the pattern. Variables with high
correlation coefficients may also be eliminated.
nee
Security Function
rin
g.n
A security function may be defined as a linear function of the feature variables,
S (F) = Sjl + SI fl + S2 f2 + .. :.. + Sm fm ..... (9.26)
et
The security function S (F) > 0 if F is secure and S (F) < 0 if F is insecure. Different
methods are available to determine the constants So' SI' ..... Sm' For example, least squares
method or optimal search method can be used successfully to determine the coefficients
So' Sm' More sophisticated and mathematically complex functions may be defined in place of
Eqn. (9.26).
After the security function is identified, its validity may be checked using patterns of
known class.
Security Evaluation
Once a valid security function is determined, then any operating condition represented by the
corresponding feature vector may be used, and from Eqn. (9.23) the operating state may be
classified either as secure or insecure.
The success of the method depends on the proper selection of the feature variables and
security function.
Pattern recognition methods may not have much relevance for steady state security
evaluation. However, it appears that for transient security evaluation, pattern recognition
techniques may provide the answer in future for situations where the fast acting automatic
control devices have restored the system balance and the slow acting controls like transformer
tappings, human decisions, etc. have not yet responded.
ww
more than a few vital ones almost impossible, especially during the intense activity of plant
start-up. The operators are called upon to visualize the implications of a variety of changing
w.E
plant parameters and take critical decisions. These requirements led to the development and
application of more advanced solid-state modular electronic instruments, computer based direct
asy
digital control and data processing systems.
A modern power system control centre has the following functions to perform:
1. Automatic generation control,
2. Economic load despatch En
4. On-line load flow,
gi
3. Automatic voltage (reactive power) control,
nee
5. On-line short circuit.
6. State estimation, r ing
7. Security monitoring,
8. Steady state security analysis,
9. Supervisory control,
. net
10. Automatic trouble analysis,
11. Emergency control like load shedding, generator t ripping, and
12. Automatic circuit restoration, etc.
The computer system involves dual configuration with external interfaces to monitor
the data. The first one is a process computer linked by telechannels to various generating and
sub-stations for data acquisition. The second one is a larger one where major calculations are
carried out and is linked to the process computer. For real-time computer control of power
systems, the following basic components are needed:
1. System wide instrumentation,
2. High speed digital telemetry,
3. Central processing unit (CPU),
4. Memory and bulk storage,
En
The data base consists of static data, dynamic data and software. The static data consists
gi
of the details of lines, transformers. generators, etc. The dynamic data includes line flows.
nee
voltage levels, breaker condition, generation and demand. The software includes operating
software, application software and support software.
r ing
The operating software is the system software for real time operation compiling routines,
file management, etc. The application software consists of programs written for power system
net
I. Off-line computer control,
2. computer-assisted control. and
3. on-line computer control.
For planning and operating computation, which are carried out at infrequent intervals,
off-line computer calculations suffice. The results are to be updated at regular time intervals. ;
In the computer-assisted control scheme, necessary data is transmitted at regular intervals
to the computer located in a central control station and its decisions are communicated to the
human operator.
For short-time processes extending up to a few minutes, the system is under continuous
control of direct acting devices. Under emergency conditions. the on-line computer which
processes the data continuously sends commands to the direct acting devices according to a
pre-planned strategy to prevent danger to the system.
The type of computer control, the configuration and the peripherals used are ultimately
decided by the cost that the utility industry is willing to invest.
ww
First Level Generating stations and sub stations Local control center
Second Level Sub transmission and transmission networks Area load dispatch center
Third level
Fourth level
or top level
w.E
Transmission system
asy
Local Control Centre
En
A number of control functions can be performed locally at power generating stations and sub-
gi
stations using local equipment and automatic devices.
Some of the typical control applications are :
nee
1. Local monitoring and control,
2. Protection, r ing
3. Auto reclosure,
4. Voltage regulation,
5. Capacitor switching,
. net
6. Feeder synchronization;
7. Load shedding in the event of necessity, and
8. Network restoration.
ww
Regional Load Dispatch Centre
The regional load dispatch centre may be regarded as a coordinating and monitoring centre for
w.E
state level dispatch centres with the following main objectives:
I. Integrated operation of state level dispatch centres,
asy
2. Operation and maintenance schedules for the generating plant,
3. Operation and maintenance schedules for maximum capacity utilization,
En
4. Monitor and control inter-state power transactions, and
nee
rin
Network automation reduces the job of the human operator to some extent. It involves
monitoring the process and remote control. Whatever may be the level of automation, all
important emergency decisions are required to be taken by the human operator.
g.n
The input data for the network automation may be obtained from important load centres
@ Di5k~ Oisk~
~
ww Con!iOl~ Console
w.E o If-lone
.dollng
laclhly
Visual di~plQy unll
Drive
tor
dlspbys
asy
E ngi
nee
Fig. 9.19 Computer control in Power system
The data may be classified as real time, static and long term data. The real time data
rin
consists of measurands, alarms, etc and is stored in core memory. Static data consists of the
background picture, text data files, etc. and is normally stored on a secondary, fast access
memory.
g.n
for postmortem analysis, measurands, etc
The man-machine interface may consists of the following:
et
Long term data may be stored on secondary, slow-access memory and consists of data
important in order that adequate generating capacity to supply the load demand, maintain system
security and supply the necessary spinning reserve is economically scheduled. In practice,
spinning reserve is provided as a back-up for either the loss of the largest unit or for the loss of
transmission capacity which renders unavailable the greatest amount of generating capacity.
But, one should not lose sight of the possibil ity ofinaccuracy in system load prediction consequent
to which deficit operating reserve capacity may result.
For plant loading schedules in thermal systems, load prediction up to two hours in
advance is necessary while for unit commitment schedules prediction up to 24 hours is sufficient.
Also, at all stations and control centres, short-time prediction is needed for storage and. display
ww
of advance information. Based on this information, predictive security assessment of the system
is made. This also helps to contain the rates of change of generator outputs within their permissible
limits.
w.E
For the implementation of economic scheduling of generation using digital computers,
a
detailed estimates of the future load demands are essential In order to allow sufficient time for
syE
the calculation and implementation of the generator schedules. Whatever method is envisaged
for the calculation of such economic schedules consistent with the security and spare
ngi
requirements of the system, the schedules should be calculated every 15 or 30 minutes and
each economic schedule should be a predictive one, for at least about 30 minutes ahead of the
nee
event. It is then obvious that the predictions are to be revised frequently in the light of any
fresh information so as to minimize the estimation errors.
rin
Peak load demand forecasts are useful in determ'ining the investment required for
g.n
additional generating and transmission capacities required. Forecasts for planning require data
extending over several previous years. Meaningful forecasts can be obtained with lead time of
3 to 5 years.
Generally, load demand is assumed to have two salient features helpful in prediction.
These are the long-term trend component dependent on economic growth, seasonal changes,
et
etc. and the weather sensitive fluctuations in daily and hourly load demands.
Thus, the overall load demand has a predictable trend component superimposed on
which is an erratic variation attributable to weather fluctuations. Summer, winter and monsoon
periods will have definite patterns of load consumption. Also, the load demand varies during
the day continuously, following a pattern with definite peaks at certain times of the day.
The weather sensitive component depends on the following meteorological factors:
1. Temperature,
2. cloudiness,
3. wind velocity,
4. visibility, and
5. precipitation.
ww
index with fair, clear sky corresponding to zero weight.
The base load is determined from past records, proper weighting of the elements of the
w.E
weather will be attained only after several trials. The method of prediction stabilizes after this
trial period. It may be noted that the base loads for week days and weekend will generally be
different for any hour.
asy
Using these base loads, a load estimate based on the best available weather forecast can
En
be made using proper weighting of meteorological factors like temperature, cloudiness, wind,
velocity; etc.
gi
In thermal stations, a boiler may take about 3 hours of time to reach full operating
nee
condition from the cold. Thus, peak load estimates In systems with predominantly thermal
generation are more critical, since they are required in time to bring any necessary generating
rin
capacity on-line. The feasibility of this method lies in the consistency of the calculations of the
base load. The base loads are to be revised every year as load demand changes continuously.
ww
method, we minimize the square of the deviation of the dependent variable from its actual or
observed value.
Let
w.E Y I = ao + al XI
If n is the number of observations or data points
asy
Dividing throughout by n gives ELX,n
LY
n
I
--=ao+a,--
n
gi nee
since
n
Y
L-'
X
r
and L-' are the mean values ofY and X respectively
n
Y and
y, = Y, - Y . net
and
or LX, Y, - a, I x~ = 0
form which
i.e.,
ww Y = a 0 + a, X we get ao as
w.E
Also
asy
En
gi nee
For the case where Y is a function of several sets of variables XI' X2,
multiple regression coefficients ai' a~, ..... ak can be derived.
........ , X k the
Let
rin
where Y is the most probable value of Y.
then if, Y= Y - Y g.n
we have
x =
Y = a,X,
X- X
+a 2 X 2 + ..... +a k Y. so that ao is eliminated.
et
Let D = (Y- yf
= I[y-(ao+a,X, +a 2 X 2 + ..... +a k x k ))2
Ifwe differentiate this with reference to ai' a2, ak
- L x IY+ a IL x ~ + a 2 L x I X2 +........... + a k L x I Xk = 0
- Lx 2 y+a l Lxl X2+a2Lx~ +........... +akLx l xk=O
ie
Rewriting as
ajLX~ +a 2 Lx jx 2 +a 3Lx 1X3 +................. + akLxlXk = LXIY
alLx l X2 +a2Lx~ +a 3Lx 2 X3 +................. +a kLx 2 Xk = LX Y2
ww aiL XI Xk +a 2L x 2 Xk +a 3
or in matrix equation form
L X3X +................. + a kL X~ = LXkY
k
w.E IX XI IAI = I XY I
the matrix equation is to be solved for A.
asy
Using the technique indicated above, the coefficients in eqn. (9.1) can be determined.
E
The terms of F(t) can be determined using the method of polynomials of least squares.
ngi
It was found that a good fit to a year's data could be obtained by fitting polynomials up to the
sixth degree.
Least Squares Polynomials
If we write
nee
~
Y=a O +a IX+a 2 X +a3 X
2
rin
3
I
In the matrix form
from which the values ofao, ai' a 2 and a 3 can be calculated. Extending the equation to
asy
sixth order will yield a good fit for F(t) for an year's data.
En
Nonlinear Regression Methods
If the relationship between demand and the specific meteorological factors on which it depends
gi
are nonlinear, the linear functions introduced in the regression analysis earlier will give only
nee
average effects over the range covered by the data. We cannot assume any specific mathematical
model for nonlinear functional relationship in advance, since its nature is not known in advance.
We can write
rin
S = fl(T) + fiW) + f3 (L) + f4 (P) + F(t) + d
g.n
Where the constant a has been included in the basic demand curve F(t). As a first
approximation, the form of the unspecified functional relationships fl(T), fiW), f 3(L), f4(P)
et
can be taken as straight lines whose slopes have the values of the corresponding linear regression
coefficients. First, all the weather sensitive components are completely removed.
F(t) + d = x - fl (T) - f2 (W) - f3 (L) - f.j (P)
Plotting a graph of the above relations, we can make an estimate of F(t) +d. Grouping
these estimates according to the day of the week and noting the difference between their
respective means and the grand mean, approximation to the day - of the week adjustments are
to be made. Then F(t) is known, giving the basic demand curve.
From this initial estimate and the data of the meteorological variables. T. W etc. the linear
approximations are successively replaced by curvilinear relationships and the proces~ is carried
on until no further improvement is obtained. For a daily load estimation, the basic demand for
the following day can be read from the final graph of F(t) and to this can be added the day-of-
the week correction. A further weather correction can be made by applying the weight
determined from the meteorological response curves using the best available weather forecasts.
ww
6 pm for the six working days of a week, this forms an ensemble of six functions. For
Sundays a similar ensemble can be constructed. It is possible to represent the load by the
relation.
w.E Pmn = Amn + fj(T m) 8 mn
gi
wind velocity Wm respectively. 8 mn , Cmn and Dmn are coefficients used to given weightage to
nee
the weather parameters depending on the time of the day. Amn is the base load. The sample
functions Pmn are thus assumed to belong to a linear manifold generated by the weighting
functions of their linear combinations.
r ing
As a preliminary step, it is required that from the load all trend components are eliminated.
. net
Finally, the residual component can be expanded into time series using spectral theory of
stochastic processes.
Equation (9.27) may be rewritten as
..... (9.28)
where Pwet) and Pit) represent the trend components of weekly and daily patterns of load
demand. Pmn(t) is the residual load component. The component Pw(t) is given by
..... (9.29)
..... (9.30)
where nw is the number of weeks for which data is available. The residual component
Pmn(t) can be expressed as a time series. If N is the total number of days for which data is
available, the auto correlation function for the residual component is given by
I N
R(t:r) = -Ly,(t)y,(t) ..... (9.3 I)
N ,=1
A characteristic function fit) is defined by the integral equation
where T is the total time period over which the prediction is valid.
a
The coefficients ak can be determined for the best fit using any standard criterion. The
syE
coefficients bk are determined by eqn. (9.32) and e(t) is the error term.
ngi
The number of terms in the time series, K, can be determined using the minimum, mean
- square error criterion given by
I-x 3 n
r(n+k) = --4 Lrn_mx ..... (9.33)
1- x 111=0
ww
computed using weighted least squires criterion. For this, the expression
r
w.E f J=
j=O
Pj [peT - j) - A T (T). F(T - j)
asy
is minimized. The constant ~ has value between zero and unity.
As an example, the time function may be a Fourier series given by
mEn
pet) = A +
,=1 gi
L aj sin ro, t + b, sin ro, t
If the time period is taken as one week then. nee
ro·=
,
27t
N
(7)(24)-'
r ing
.
where N is a positive integer. The selection of the actual number of frequencies is
dependent on the auto - correlation function and power spectrum for the observed hourly
net
dat,. The coefficients "a,", "b," and Ao are to be revised each hour
w.E
and k(t) is the observation noise.
For short term load forecasting, with lead times of about ten minutes to an hour, the
asy
load may contain an increment ~P(t). The weather conditions may not play any role, since in
such a short time they may not vary so much as to change the consumption pattern.
En
The model could be represented in thts case by
pet + ~t) = pet) + ~P(t) + n 1(t)
gi
~P(t
Z(t) =
+ ~t) = pet) +
pet) + K(t)
n2 (t)
nee
..... (9.37)
net
pet + ~t) = pet) + K(t)[Z(t + ~t) - pet) . .... (9.39)
ww
other event, are called independent events. The probabi Iity of occurrence of any two independent
events is given by the product of the probabilities of occurrence of each event separately.
w On the other hand, if two events cannot happen both at the same time, then they are said
.Ea
to be mutually exclusive. The probability of occurrence of mutually exclusive events is given
by the sum of the probabilities of the occurrence of each event in the mutually exclusive event
group.
syE
Binomial distribution may be used to calculate the probabilities for power generation
ngi
reserve capa;;ily calculations. For any event, if s is the probability of success and f is the
probability of failure, then for n trials
(s + f)n =
n
L nC, Sr fn-r nee
r
r~O
The probability for the existence of each of the above states can be computed using the
binomial expansion with n = 2. The results are shown in Table 9.2
ww Total
It may be noted that the probabilities are computed from the relation
1.0000
asy
In a similar manner. the probability of occurrence of various outages for a 3-unit power
plant can be computed. Consider a power station with three identical units. each of capacity
En
110MW. The forced outage rate for each unit is 0.03. the availability rate, therefore, for each
Ilnits is 0.97. The probability of occurrence of various states in operation are computed and
I. .... ted in Table 9.3
gi nee
Table 9.3 Three - Unit System Outage Probabilities
State Capacity
Outage MW
Capacity
Available MW
rin Probability
I 0 120
(0.97)3 g.n
(0.95)(0.95) = 0.9029
0.912673
et
I 0 330 =
Consider a power system with two similar units, each of 60MW capacity and another
generating unit and another generating unit of II OMw. The forced outage rate for the 60Mw
unit is 0.03, while the same for the II OMW unit is 0.1.
Table 9.4 Four unit System Outage Probabilities
ww 3
4
130
195
130
65
6(0.96)2(004)2 = 0.00884730
4(0.96) (0.04)3 = 0.00024576
w.E
5 260 0 (0.04)4 = 0.00000250
To begin with, the probabilities are computed separately as before. These are shown in
Table 9.S
En
gi
Table 9.5 Outage probabilities for different type of units
Two - 60 MW sets
nee One -1I0MW
r
Capacity out Mw Probability Capacity out MW Probability
0 (0.97)" = 0.9409 0
ing 090
120
Total
60 2(0.97)(0.03) = 0.0582
(0.03j2 = 0.0009
1.0000
110
Total
. 0.10
1.00
net
The results of both the calculations are combined now to find the outage probabilities
for the combined system (Table 9.6)
Table 9.6 Outage Probabilities for System with Dissimilar Units
Total 1.000000
ww 1
~ Load duration curve
w.E ~:
'-'I
"0 '
'"
0'
asy
....ll L -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
E
I
Fig. '9.20 Application of probability to loss of load
ngi
,
Installed capacity
nee
Reserve capacity
rin
..... ..... g.n
Fig. 9.21
ime (for which load exceeded the value)-
dified model of capacity on maintenance
..... .....
et
Installed capacity
Capacity on maintenance
Reserve capacity
1
~
6r-------~==--~------~
Load duration curve
alo
....l
If Pk is the probability of the outage Lk and tk is the period of time units for which the
outage causes loss of load. The total expected loss of load for the time period is
n
E(t) = L Pk tk time units
k=l
All outages in excess of the reserve capacity will result in loss of load for different time
periods and each outage Pk contributes a system load loss of Pk tk time units. For a daily load
duration, curve, the time period is hours. For annual load curves, daily peaks may be used.
The effect of capacity on maintenance can be considered in two ways. This is shown in
Fig. 9.20 & 9.21.
ww Consider, as an example for the loss of load probability calculation, a system with four
generating units, each rated at 65 MW. The forced outage rate for each generator unit is 0.04.
w.E
the load duration curve is a straight line with a maximum of 190MW and a minimum of
40MW. Since the installed capacity is 260MW, the reserve capacity is 260- J 90=70MW. The
asy
outage probability table is shown in Table 9.7
I
2
0
65
260
195 nee
0.84934000
0.14155000
1.00000000
0.15064000
3
4
130
195
130
65 rin
0.00884730
0.00024576
0.00909560
0.00024830
5 260 0 0.00000256
g.n
0.00000256
As may be noted from Table 9.7, the cumulative probability decreases as the capacity
outage increases.
Installed capacity
et
130 195
MW
f MW
Load
~ duration
6
'0 t2 = 83.3 h
'"
.9 40
~
o
p...
Since the reserve capacity is 70MW, state 2 does not Involve any loss of load. State 3
results in a loss of load for a period of 40% of time and state 4 has loss of load for 83.3% of
time. This is shown in Fig. 9.22. The expected load calculations are shown in Table 9.8.
2. 65 195 0.14155000 0 -
ww3.
4.
130
195
130 0.00884730
0.00024576
40 0.353890
0.020466
w.E
65 83.3
Total 0.374350
asy
If the load duration curve has a time period of about 261 days excluding 52 weekends
(Sundays and Saturdays) from 365 days, then the expected load loss is
gi 100 -
nee
the maintenance of the desired level of reliability on the operation of the system is
dependent 0 the spinning capacity reserve. In the case of static reserve capacity, the available
generation is the entire installation capacity; while for a spinning reserve capacity, it is generally
r ing
assumed that there is sufficient installed capacity available and only the time delay in bringing
in a replacement is considered. Thus, in spinning reserve capacity calculations, outage
.
replacement rate is used in place of forced outage rate for probability evaluation. The outage
net
replacement rate is defined as the product of unit failure rate and delay time for replacement
unit. However, this is valid only if the outage replacement rate is much less than unity.
Questions
ww
7.
8.
Explain the term voltage stability. How can it be over come? Discuss
What do you understand by the term "power quality"? Explain
9.
10.
w.E
Discuss the various factors involved in power quality problem
Explain any method for the computation of loss of load probability.
II. Ho~
asy
reliability studies are important in power system operation? Explain.
12.
13. En
Explain "Security" in relation to power system operation.
What is contingency evaluation is connection with power system security.
14.
gi
What are energy control centers? Explain.
nee
r ing
. net
Objective Questions
I.
ww
Consider a power system with three identical generators. The transmission losses are
w.E
negligible. One generator (GI) has a speed governor which maintains its speed constant
at the rated value, while the other generators (G2 and G3) have governors with a droop
asy
of 5%. If the load of the system is increased, then in steady state []
E
(a) generation of G2 & G3 is increased equally while generation of G I is unchanged.
ngi
(b) generation ofGI alone is increased while generation ofG2 & G3 is unchanged
(c) generation of G I, G2 and G3 is increased equally
nee
(d) generation ofGI, G2 and G3 is increased in the ratio 0.5:0.25:0.25
2.
rin
Gausss - Seidel iterative method can be used for solving a set of
(a) linear differential equations only
(b) linear algebraic equations on Iy
g.n
3.
(c) both linear and nonlinear algebraic equations
(d) both linear and nonlinear differential equations et
A power station consists oftwo synchronous generators A and B of ratings 250 MVA and
500 MVA with inertia 1.6 p.u. and 1 p.u., respectively on their own base MVA ratings.
The equivalent p.u. inertia constant for the system on 100 MVA common base is
(a) 2.6 (b) 0.615 (c) 1.625 (d) 9.0
4. The incremental cost characteristics of two generators delivering 200MW are as follows
<if'
_I = 2.0 + O.OIPI
dPI
5. A power system has two synchronous generators. The Governer - turbine characteristics
corresponding to the generators are
P J = 50(50 - f), P2 = 100(51 - f)
Where f denotes the system frequency in Hz, and P J and P2 are respectively, the power
outputs (in MW) of turbines 1 and 2. Assuming the generators and transmission network
to be lossless, the system frequency for a total load of 400MW is []
(a) 4705Hz (b) 48.0Hz (c) 4805Hz (d) 49.0Hz
6. The bus impedance matrix of a 4-bus power system is given by
w.E Z
BUS
-
- jO.2723 jO.2586 jO.2791
[
jO.2209
jO.2277 jO.2414 jO.2209 jO.2791
asy
A branch having an impedance ofjO.2 ohm is connected between bus 1 and the reference.
En
Then the values of Z22,new and Z 23,new of the bus impedance matrix of the modified
network are respectively
gi
(a) jO.5408 ohm and j0.4586 ohm
(c) jO.5408 ohm andjO.0956 ohm nee
(b) jO.1260 ohm and jO.0956 ohm
(d) jO.1260 ohm andjO.1630 ohm
[ ]
7.
r ing
A power system consists of 300 buses out of which 20 buses are generator buses, 25
buses are the ones with reactive power support and 15 buses are the ones with fixed
.
shunt capacitors. All the other buses are load buses. It is proposed to perform a load
flow analysis for the system using Newton - Raphson method. The size of the
Newton - Raphson Jacobian matrix is [
net ]
(a) 553 x 553 (b) 540 x 540 (c) 555 x 555 (d) 554 x 554
8. Ifa generator of250 MVA rating has an inertia constant of6MJIMVA, its inertia constant
on lOOMVA base is [ ]
(a) 15MJIMVA (b) lOo5MJ/MVA (c) 6MJ/MVA (d) 2.4MJ/MVA
9. In load - flow analysis, the load at a bus is represented as [
(a) a constant current drawn from the bus
(b) a constant impedance connected at the bus
(c) constant real and reactive powers drawn from the bus
(d) a voltage - dependent impedance at the bus
10. A transmission line has equal voltages at the two ends, maintained constant by two
sources. A third source is to be provided to maintain constant voltage (equal to end
voltages) at either the midpoint of the line or at 75% of the distance from the sending
end. Then the maximum power transfer capabilities of the line in the original case and
the other two cases respectively will be, in the following ration. []
(a) 1 : 1 : 1 (b) I : 2 : 1/0.75 (c)I:2:4 (d) I : 4: 16
11. The inertia constant ofa I OOMVA, 50Hz, 4-pole generator is 10MJ/MVA. If the mechanical
input to the machine is suddenly raised from 50MW to 75MW, the rotor acceleration
will be equal to [ ]
w.E
(a) Y:z hr (b) 24 hr (c) I sec (d) I week
asy
13. The input - output characteristic is plotted
(a) Fuel input Vs power output (b) Fuel input Vs time
E
(c) Fuel rate V s power output
14. Hear rate curve is plotted in
ngi
(d) Fuel rate Vs energy output
(a) k-cal/kwhr Vs KW
(c) k-callKW Vs Kw nee
(b) K-cal/hr Vs KW
(d) K-cal Vs KW
rin
15. Incremental production cost and incremental fuel cost are
(a) both the same (b) IPC > IFC
g.n
(c) IPC < IFC (d) They are not related
16. The incremental transmission loss for a 2-plant system is given by et
(a) -dF ( 1 +
OPL-) (b) -dF ( 1 OPL
- -)
dPj oPi dP j oPI (c) (
1+_L
OP)
oPi
(d) (1- oP OPL )
19. IfR = 0.04 HzJMw by how much will the turbine power decrease, iffrequency rises by
O.IHZ [ ]
(a) 0.024Mw (b) 1I0.024MW (c) 0.0024Mw (d) 4.17MW
20. What is the load damping factor D for an area operated at 1000Mw, 50Hz
ww
(a) 100 (b) 50 (c) 25 (d) 20
w.E
21. If the power system has a transfer function
Kp
1 +STp
and given that the load damping
asy
D = 25MW/Hz. What is the value of Kp
(a) 0.04HzJMW (b) OAHzJMW (c) 0.25HzJMW (d) 25HzJMW
1
E
22. Area frequency response characteristic is
I ngi D D
[
(a) D+-
R
(b) R +-
D
nee
(c) -
R
(d) - -
R
d
(a) fddt (b) -M (c) df (d) - .!:df
dt R
26. When integral control is applied, if the control gain Kr is greater than critical gain, the
response is // [ ]
(a) over damped (b) damped oscillatory
(c) un damped oscillatory . I( d) unstable operation
ww
(a) seriously
(b) only negligible action at t = 0+
w.E
(c) may cause trouble if governor is fast in action
(d) may cause trouble if the rating of the turbine is very high
asy
29. The time constant of the power system Tp is defined by
(a) Tp = -o-
2H
En( b) T = 2fo
HO
(c) Tp =-o-
20 f~
(d) 2HD
f D
gi
p f H
30. Which of the following correct?
nee
(a) load frequency control has serious affect on voltage profile
]
r ing
(b) if a generator is connected to an infinite bus the frequency change with load is
negligible
.
(c) turbine power increment for load change does not depend upon the response
characteristic of the turbine net
(d) all the generating stations in any country can be treated as belonging to a single
control area
31. Given til = 50Hz, 0 = 20Mw/Hz, area rated- power = 2000Mw and H =- 5 sec the area
time constant Tp is [ ]
(a) 5 sec (b) 10 sec (c) 15 sec (d) 20 sec
32. Unit commitment is
(a) Economic schedule among different units
(b) Planning of generating units for future load increase
Cc) Optimal combination of units for operation at anyone time
Cd) To choose proper units from thermal, hydro and nuclear plants
( c) I. pI-< pmax
pmlO :os;
I I -J I
(d) Vmtn < pm3x 2 + Qmax 2
I
34. Which of the following is a valid dynamic programming equation I
(b) Fn(~Pi)-fn(Pn)+Fn_{~PI)
asy
(b) Kuhn - Tucker multipliers
ngi
36. The dependent variables in optimal load flow studies are ]
(a) P and Q (b) IVI and 0 (c) P andnee IVI (d) P,Q, IVI and 0
37. Given Bll = 0.02, B22 = 0.04; B12 - B21 = 0.001
rin
2 tv
g.n
et
load
What are the transmission loss when lOMw is supplied by plant 2 to the load [ ]
(a) 2Mw (b) 4Mw (c) O.OOIMW (d) zero
38. 0.04 regulation in speed for a 100Mw rated generator means [ ]
(i) 2.0Hz drop in frequency
(ii) 40Hz drop in frequency
(iii) R = 0.02 HZ/Mw
(a) (i) is only correct (b) (i) and (ii) are both correct
(c) (ii) and (iii) are both correct (d) (i) and (iii) are both correct
ww
40. In load flow studies
(i) convergence of iterative method depends upon the diagonal dominance in YBUS
w.E
matrix
(ii) sparsity of Z - bus matrix is well exploited
asy
(iii) for large well conditioned system with n-buses the number of iteration required is
approximately n2 •
I are true,En
(iv) Z - matrix methods is very sensitive to choice of slack bus. Which of the above is
[ ]
gi
(a) (i) and (ii)
(c) (iii) and (iv)
(b) (ii) and (iv)
nee
(d) (i) and (iii)
41. In load flow solution by N-R method
r ing
(i) the rectangular coordinates method is slower compared to polar - coordinates method
(ii) the Jacobian in case of rectangular coordinates is not symmetric
.
(iii) the Jacobian with usual formulation in polar coordinates is symmetric
(iv) the N-R method converges in 2-5 iterations
net
which of the following is correct
(a) (i) and (iv) are true (b) (ii) and (iv) are true
(c) (i), (ii) and (iv) are true (d) (i), (ii) and (iii) are true
42. Economic dispatch problem is related to
(i) selection of generating units for loading
(ii) planning for generating system expansion
(iii) determine profit from energy sales
(iv) ascertain cost of energy production
(a) (i) and (iii) (b) (i) and (iv)
(c) (ii) and (iii) , (d) (iii) and (iv)
w.E
45. Transmission capacity can be increased by
(i) reducing the effective reactance of the line
asy
(ii) increasing the voltage levels
(iii) by suing bundled conductors
E ngi
(iv) by increasing the load angle d to some extent
(a) (i) and (iii) are the same
nee
(b) (i) (ii) and (iii) increase the power transfer
(c) (i) and (iv) do not mean the same control
rin
(d) bundled conductors infact decrease the transmission capacity
46. The natural load of a transmission line can be expressed by g.n ]
(a)B.X\'- (b)B/X (c)X/B (d)B+X
et
where B is the line susceptance and X is the line reactance of the line being considered
47. The transmission losses in a line are
(a) directly proportional to voltage Y
,(b) inversely proportional to voltage Y
(c) directly proportional to y2
(d) inversely proportional toy2
48. Rapid changes in system voltage cause
(a) Flicker (b) Yoltage dips
(c) corona (d) loss of synchronism
w.E
(b) volts / ampere
(c) field amperes per output amperes
asy
(d) change in field voltage to change in output voltage
(a) IOOV E
51. The exciter voltage for a 100MVA set is about
(b) 440V
ngi
(c) IKV
52. As per IEEE standard, the exciter block is represented by
(d) 250V
nee
~
(a) 1+ STe (b)
I +STe rin
53. The voltage regulator block diagram shows an
(i) inherent phase lag (ii) inherent phase lead
g. net ]
(iii) inherent steady state error (iv) inherent instability at larger gains
(a) (i) and (ii) are correct (b) (ii) and (iii) are correct
(c) (ii), (iii) and (iv) are correct (d) (i) iii) and (iv) are correct
54. Under sterdy state condition, if K is the over all forwar~ path gain. Then, the steady
state error .1ess is [ ]
I I
(a).1e =-- (b).1e ss =K-
ss 1+ K
I
(c) .1e ss is independent ofk (d) .:1e ss =1+ K
ww
56. A power system stabilizer improves
w.E
(i) phase lag
(ii) improves damping
asy
(iii) produces torque in phase with speed
(a) (i) and (ii) only are correct (b) (ii) and (iii) only are correct
ngi
(d) (i) (ii) and (iii) are correct
[
nee
(a) synchronous motors operate with adjustable excitation
(b) synchronous compensators cannot given dynamic reactive power compensation
rin
(c) by supplying a synchronous compensator from a tertiary winding, need for separate
transformer can be avoided.
(d) A synchronous compensator can even improve stability g.n
58. Per unit change in vol.tage magnitUde is equal to et
~Q S
(a) - (b) J£. (d) l:!.Q + Sse
·Sse ~Q
where ~Q is the change in reactive-power and Sse is the short circuit capacity.
59. Which of the following are true?
(i) the quadrature voltage compensator would control active power flow in the system
(ii) an in-phase voltage booster would control the reactive power flow in the system
(iii) the natural loading limit is the lowest limit for power transfer
(iv) thermal limit is the highest limit for power .transfer
(a) (i) and (ii) are only correct (b) (ii) only is correct
(c) (i) (ii) and (iii) only are correct (d) all are correct
ww
end .
X
(c) R = -
[
R
]
(a) X = J'jR
w.E (b) R = J'jx
X
R
2
(d) X = -
2
En
63. In Var compensators using thyristors
(a) filters are not necessary
(b) the dominant harmonic is second
(c) filters are needed for 5th and
gi 7th harmonic nee
(d) capacitors are switched on the h.v. side only
rin
64. Static var compensators
(i) reduce voltage swings at the rolling mills g.n J
66. The power flow from area 1 to area 2 is giv~n by with usual notation
w.E
68. Which of the following is correct
21t
En
(iii) M = _I f Afdt (iv) M = 21t fMdt
nee
(d) (i) (iii) and (iv)
69. The inertia consists of two groups of machines which do not swing together are MI and
M2• The equivalent inertia constant of the system is : .[ ]
(a) MI + M2
M,M 2 ~
r
(b) M, - M2 ifMI > M2
ing
(c) M +M
, 2
(d) "M I M 2
. net
70. If AP OJ = K\ and AP 02 = 0, in a two area system, the steady state frequency error is
71. What is the tie-I ine power deviation if AP D:! = Is and AP DI =0 for a two area system
72. For two equal areas, for a load disturbance of AP D in an area, the steady state frequency
error is [ ]
AP ~ 2~ (d) A~PD
(a) _D
(c) AP
2~
(b) 2AP 2
D D
73. If two equal areas with tie line power interchange of P12 experience a load change f1P D
in one of the areas, the tie line power deviation is [ ]
L\PD • n. L\PD n. L\PD
(a) - (b) 1-'1 -2- (c) 1-'_1 ") (d) L\P o
2 ....
74. Which of the following is true
(i) A synchrono\ls generator at sub synchronous frequencies acts as an induction
generator
(ii) At sub synchronous frequencies the rotor resistance viewed from the armature
ww ter.minals is negative.
(iii) At sub synchronous frequencies resonance may occur between electrical and
w.E
mechanical system
(iv) Series compensation causes sub synchronous resonance at very low frequencies
asy
(a) (i) is true
(c) (i), (ii) and (iii) are true
(b) (i) and (ii) are true
(d) (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) are true
En
gi nee
r ing
. net
ww
2.
3.
(b)
(b)
27.
28.
(b)
(b)
52.
53.
(e)
(d)
4.
5.
w.E
(d)
(b)
"29.
30.
(a)
(b)
54.
55.
(a)
(d)
-6. (b)
(b)
asy 31.
32.
(d)
(e)
56.
57.
(d)
(b)
En
7.
8. (a) 33. (e) 58. (a)
9.
10.
(e)
(a)
(a)
34.
35.
36.
gi
(d)
(c)
(b) nee
59.
60.
(d).
(d)
11. 61. (a)
12.
13.
(a)
(a)
37.
38.
(d)
(~)
r 62.
63. ing(d)
(e)
14.
15.
(a)
(b)
39.
40.
(d)
(d)
64.
65.
.
(d)
{d) net
16. (d) 41. (d) 66. (a)
17. (d) 42. (d) 67. (a)
18. (d) 43. (c) 68. (a)
19. (d) 44. (a) 69. (e)
20. Cd) 45. (d) 70. (a)
21. (a) 46. (b) 71. (a)
22. (a) 47. (d) 72. (a)
23. (a) 48. (a) 73. (a)
24. (e) 49. (e) 74. (d)
25. (e) 50. Ca)
References
Books
1. Beveridge G.S.G and R.S. Schechter, Optimisation: Theory and Practice, McGraw-
ww
2.
Hill Book Co., New York, 1970.
Rao, S.S., Optimisation: Theory and Application, Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi.
3.
1978.
w.E
Kirk, Donald E., Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction, Prentice Hall Inc.,
asy
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1970.
4.
Book Co., New York, 1971.
En
Eigerd, Olle t, Electric Energy Steams Theory: An Introduction, McGraw Hill
5.
gi
Kirchmayer, L.K., Economic Control of Interconnected Systems, John Wiley and
Sons, New York, 1959.
nee
6. Zaborszky L. and J. W. Rittenhouse, Electric Power Transmission, The Ronald
7.
Press Co., New York, 1954.
r ing
Taylor, Openshaw (Ed.), Power System Plant, George Newnes Ltd .. London.
8.
1955.
Stagg Glenn w.,
. net
and A.H. EI-Abiad, Computer Methods in Power System Analysis
McGraw-Hill B09k Co. Ltd., New York, 1968.
9. Blindleistung, VDE Verlag, GmBH, Berlin 1963.
10. Handschin E. (Ed.), Real Time Control of Electric Power Systems, Elsevier
Publishing Co., Amsterdam 1972.
11. P.M. Anderson, Power System Control and Stability, A.A. Fauad, The Iowa State
University Press.
12. Paul.e. Krause, Analysis ofEleotrical Machines, McGraw Hill Book co.
13. V. Venikov, Transient Processes in Electrical Power System, Mir Publishers, Moscow
14.
15.
.
Hadi Saadat, Power System Analysis. McGraw Hill International Edition .
PSR Murty, Power System Operation and Control, Tata - McGraw HiU -1984.
402 References
11.
(PAS), 76, June 1956. '
et
Br.own H.E. et ai., "Power flow solution by impedance matrix iterative method",
IEEE Trans (PAS), 82, Apr. 1963.
12. H.E. Brown, Z-matrix algorithms in load flow programs, IEEE Trans (PAS), 87
March 1968.
13. Hart, C.E. and W.F. Tinney, "Power flow solution by Newton's method", IEEE
Trans (PAS), 86, 1967.
14. Stott. B. "Decoupled Newton-load flow", Trans (PAS), 91, Sep/Oct. 1972.
15. Peterson N .M. W.F. Tinney, and D. W: Bree, "Iterative linear ac power flow solution
for fast approximate outage studies", IEEE Trans. (PAS), 91, Sep./Oet. 1972.
16. Stott, Band O. Alsae, "Fast decoupled load flow", IEEE Trans. (PAS), 93,
May/ June 1974.
References 403
17. Tinney W.F. and J. W. Walker, "Direct solution ot spares network equations by
optimally ordered triangular factorisation", Proc. IEEE, 55, Nov. 1967.
18. Stott, B, "Load flow calculation methods", Proc. IEEE, 62, July 1974.
19. Noakes, F. and A. Arismonandar, "A Bibliography on optimum operation of power
systems 1919-1959", IEEE Trans (PAS), 82,1963.
20. Baker, A.D. and S.O. Navarro "The. use of cubic cost curVes in the economic
loading of electric power systems", IEEE Trans. (PAS), 84,1965.
21. Smith, H.M. and S. Y. Tong, "Minimizing' power transmission losses by reactive
volt amperes control", IEEE Trans (PAS), 82,1963.
ww
22. Bauman, R."Power flow solution with optimal reactive flow"., Archiv fur Elektro-
23. w.E
techn ik, 48,1963.
Dopazo, J.F. O.A. Klitin, G. W. Stagg andM. Watson, "An optimization technique
24. asy
for real and reactive power allocation", Proc [EE; 45, 1967.
Carpentier, J. "Contribution a I'etude du dispatching economique'Bulletin de la
En
Societe fransaise des Electriciens, 3 Aug. 1962.
25.
26.
gi
Carpentier, J. and J. Siroux, "L'optimisation de la production a L'Electricite de
nee
France", Bulletin de la Societe Frallcaise des Electriciens, 1963.
Pescon, J.,D.S.Piercy,W.F. Tinney an~ O:J. Tveit, "Optimum control of reactive
27.
power flow," IEEE Trans. (PAS), 1968.
r ing
Shen, C.M. and M.A. Laughton, "Determination of optimum power system,
28.
.
operating conditions under constraints", Proc. IEEE, 116, Feb. 1969.
Dommel, H. W. and W.F.Tinney, "Optimal power flow solutions", IEEE Transnet
(PAS) 87, 1968.
29. EI- Abiad, A.H. and FJ. Jaimes, "A method fOT optimum scheduling of power
and voltage magnitude, IEEE Trans (PAS) 88, Apr. 1969.
30. Fletcher, R. and MJ.D. Powell, "A rapidly convergent descent method for
minimization," Computer journal, June 1963.
31. Bird, J.1.,' 'Load dispatching on the CEGB System," Paper presented at
Symposium on Optimal power system operation, Univ. of Manchester, Sep. 1969.
32. Lowery, P.G. "Generating unit commitment by dynamic programming," IEEE Trails
(PAS) 85,1966.
33. Udo, M., "Optimisation of start-up and shut-down of thermal units", Proe.
Third PSCC 1969 Rome paper 0.S.7.
404 References
34. Kerr, R.H., J.L. Scheidt, A.J. Fontana and J.K. Wiley, "Unit Commitment" IEEE
Trans (PAS), 85, 1966.
35. Hara, K. Kimura M. and N. Honda, "A method for planning economic unit
commitment and maintenance of thermal power systems", IEEE Trans. (PAS)
85,1966.
36. Nagrath, I.J. and S.K. Agarwal,"Optimum scheduling of hydrothermal systems",
Proe. lEE, 1) 9, Feb. 1972.
37. Nagrath, I.J., G. Dayal and D.P. Kothari, "Optimum scheduling ofhydro-thennal
system taking transmission loss into account", Jour. IE (India), 52. Oct. 1971.
38.,ww Drake, J.H., L.K. Kirchmayer, R.B. Mayall, and H. Wood, "Optimum operation
39. w.E
ofa hydro-thermal system," Trans. AlEE (PAS), 82, Aug. 1962.
Bonaert, A.P. A-EI-Abiad and Koivo "Optimum scheduling of hydro-thermal power
40. a
systems", Proc. Seventh PICA Con/., Boston, 1971.
syE
Murty, P.S.R., "Effect of system loads on optimal load flow solutions," Jr.
(India), 58,.Pt. EL3, Dec. 1977.
[£
41.
ngi
Hochstetter Werner, "Properties of static compensators for power supply systems",
42.
Siemens Review, Aug. 1977.
nee
Achenbach, H., W. Hanke and W. Hochstetter, "Controllable static reactive power
rin
compensators in electrical supply systems", Second IEAC Symposium on Control
in Power Electronics and ElectricaJ Drive, Dusseldorf, Oct~ 1977.
43. g .ne
Tyll, Heinz, '''Use of static compensators in transmission system", Symp. On
Reactive Power Compensation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May 1979.
44.
mark power system, IEEE Trans. (PAS) 97, May/June 1978.
t
Fouad, A.A., and K. T. Khu, "Subsynchronous resonance zones in the IEEE bench
45. Kilgore, L.A., L.e. Elioh and E.R. Taylor, "The prediction and control of self
excited oscillations due to series capacitors in power systems", IEEE Trans. (PAS),
90, May/June 1971.
46. Hergert, J.e. and e. W. Park, "Parameter identification and verification of low
order boiler models", IEEE Trans. on PAS. PAS-75, No.4, July/Aug. 1976.
47. Cohn, Nathan "Power flow control-Basic concepts for interconnected systems",
Mid West Power Conference, USA, 1950.
48. Elgerd, 0.1. "Trends and philosophies of power systems control", Alterton
Conference on Circuits and Systems, Oct. 1973.
References 405
49. Cohn, Nathan, "Fundamentals for control of generati<;m and power flow on
interconnected systems", Invited Talk, North American Power Systems
Interconnection Committee Meeting, Las Vegaes, Navada, USA. Sep. 1970.
50. mgerd, 0.1. and C.E. Fosha, "Optimum megawatt-frequency control ofmulti-ar~
electric energy system", IEEE Trans (PAS), 89, Apr. 1970.
51. Fosha, C.E. and 0.1. Elgerd, "The megawatt-frequency control problem: A new
approach via optimal control theory", IEEE Trans (PAS) 89. Apr. 1970.
52. Murty, P.S.R. and P. V. Ramana Rao, "Optimal load frequency control and system
56.
1978.
gi nee
Venkateswarlu K. and A.K. Mahalanabis. "Load frequency control using output
57. r
feedback", Jour. IE (India), Pt EL4 58, Feb. 1978.
ing
Nanda, J. M.L. Kothari, and P.S. Satsanghi, "Automatic. Generation control reheat
58.
Journal IE (India), Pt EL6, 63. June 1983. .
thermal system considering generation rate constraint and governor dead band'.,
net
Liacco Thomas E.Dy. et aI., "Automation of CEI system lor security", PICA
Boston, USA, 1971.
59. Bhaskaran K., "Technology trends in power plant operation", Second Symp. on
Power plant dynamics and control BHEL (R&D), Hyderabad, Feb. 1979.
60. Liacco, Thomas E. Dy "Real time computer control of power systems", Proc. A
IEEE, 162, July 1974.
61. Larson, R.E. et aI., "State estimation in power systems", IEEE Trans. (PAS)
89,1970.
62. Kuppurajulu, A., "Digital Computers for on line control", NPSC, Electrical Engg.
Dept., Osman ia University, Dec. 1981.
63. Choudhari, S.H. "Turbine instrumentation and automation", NPSC, Elec. Engg.,
Osmania University, Dec. 1981.
406 References
64. Gupta, P.G., "Stochastic approach to peak power demand forecasting in Electric
Utility systems", IEEE Trans. on PAS PAS-90 No 2, Mar./Apr. 1971.
65. Christiannse, W.R., "Short-term load forecasting using exponential smoothing",
IEEE Trans on PAS PAS-90 No.2, Mar'! Apr. 1971.
66. Mathewan, P.D. and H. Nicholsan, "Techniques for load prediction in the electricity
supply industry", Proc. lEE (London), tiS (power) Oct. 1968.
67. Farmer, D.E. and MJ. Potton, "Development of on-line prediction techniques
with results from trials in the south West Region of the CEG", Proc lEE Londo!"!,
w 68. Toyoda. J, Mo-Shing Chev and Yukiyoshi Inoue, "An application of state to
.Ea
estimation to short-term load forecasting part-I "Forecasting modelling Part-II,
Implementation, IEEE Trans. On PAS, PAS - 89, No 7, Sept/Oct 1970.
69.
syE
Larson, Robert E, Willam, F, Tinney and John Peschan, "State estimation in power
systems part-I theory and feas.ibility", IEEE Trans. on PAS, PAS. March 1970.
70.
ngi
Larson, Robert E., W.F. Tinney, L.P. Hajdu and D.S. Piercy "State estimation in
nee
power systems Part-II: Implementation and applications", IEEE Trans on PAS 80,
March 1970.
In.dex
A E
Active Power Scheduling 103 Effect of Bias Factor ,267
ww
Analysis of Single Area System 205
Arc furnace 293, 332,333
ElectricalStiffness 7
Emergency Mode 6
w.E
Area Load Dispatch Centre 367 Energy Control Cente~ 7
Energy Scheduling 121
c rin
Exciter Ceiling Voltage 298
Exciter Response 298
Capacrto~ 7,315,321
Exponential Smoothing 378,379
g.n
Commitment schedules 171, 173
Compensation 289,292,320,321 FACTS Controlte~ 7,346
F
et
Complete Tie-Line Bias Control 250,251,266 Fast Decoupled Methods 27
Constraints 94,95 Flat Frequency Control 201, 241, 244, 251
Constraints for Plant 173 Flat Tie-Line and Flat Frequency Control 244
Cost Function 171,173, 180 Flicker 352, 355
Fuel ordering 5
D
Decentralised Control 284 G
Decoupled Methods 27
Gauses - Seidel Iterative Method 13
Dynamic Programming 175, 177, 179-, 180
Generating Capacity Reliability and Outage
Dynamic Response 199,208,237,257,287,306 Probabi 380
408 Index
H M
Heat Rate Characteristic 88 Matrix Riccati Equation 224
Hydro Speed Governing System 232,235' Merit Order Method 97
Hydro Thermal Scheduling 5, 120, 125 Modal for a Steam Vessel 196
ww I
ModelReduction 284,285
w.E
Modem Control Theory 224,239
IEEE Type 1 Excitation System 310 MUltiple Regression Methods 371
Impedane of Reactive Power 289
asy
Incremental Production Cost Characteristics 89
Incremental Water Rate Characteristics 91 NetworkAutomation 368
N
E
Induction Regulators Static VarCompensators 7
Input Output Curves 87 ngi Newton Raphson method 16, 71
Ncn-linearProgramming 157
Interconnected Operation 241,242, 266
nee
Nonlinear Regression Methods 375
Normal mode 6
Index 409
ww
Pumped Storage Plant 120
PV-bus 14,22
State Variable 269,274,275
State Variable Model 269, 274, 275
w.E R
Static Compensators 328,343
Static Excitation System 300
asy
Rate of Power Generation 236
Reactive Power Control for Loss Minimization
Static Load Model 32, 33
Static Var Compensator (SVC) 349
155
Reactors 7,315,321
En Steady State Security Assessment 361, 362
gi
Real power balance 200, 202
Rectangular coordinates 16, 17, 20, 22
Rectifier loads 353,355
Steady State Security Assessor 361,362
nee
Steady State Speed Regulation 184, 185
Steam Turbine Model 197, 198
ing
Supplementary Control 242,251,269
Synchronizing Coefficient 7
Restorative mode 6
s .
Synchronous Compensators 292,314
System Voltage and Reactive Power 293net
Security Evaluation 364,365
Security Function 363,364
T
Series - Series Controllers 347 Tap Changers 7
410 Index
ww
Triangular Decompostion 23
Two Area System 266, 288
Voltage Regulator 297,302,305
Voltage Regulators 294,302, 309
w
Type 1 S system 309
Type 1 System 309
Type 2 System 310 .Ea
Voltage Sags 353,355
Voltage Stability 7,350
nee
r ing
. net
ww
w.E
asy
En
gin
eer
ing
.ne
t