Angle Modulation
Angle Modulation
Frequency Modulation
Frequency modulation is that form of angle modulation in which the instantaneous
frequency fi(t) is varied linearly with the message signal m(t) as shown by
fi(t) = fc + kf m(t) (1)
the term fc represents the frequency of the unmodulated carrier , and the constant kf
represents the frequency sensitivity of the modulator expressed in hertz per volt .This
assumes that m(t) is a voltage waveform.
Integrating eq.1 with respect to time and multiplying the result by 2π ,we
get
Where
k f = nk1 (2)
FM can be generated by first integrating m(t) and then using the result as the input to the
phase modulator as shown in fig.1
Fig.1a shows a sinusoidal modulating wave m(t) with 2 full cycles and FM wave
produced by this modulating wave is shown in fig.1b.fig.1c shows the derivative
dm(t)/dt,which consists of original sinusoidal modulating wave shifted in phase by 900
and the desired PM plot is shown in fig.1d.
f i (t ) = f c + k f Am cos(2πf m t )
(2)
= f c + ∆f cos(2πf m t )
Where
∆f = k f Am (3)
The quantity is called the frequency deviation, representing the maximum departure of
the instantaneous frequency of the FM wave from the carrier frequency. A fundamental
characteristic of an FM wave is that the frequency deviation is proportional to the
amplitude of the modulating wave and is independent of the modulation frequency.
Using Eq 2, the regular argument of the FM wave is obtained as
t
θ (t ) = 2π ∫ f i (t )dt
0
(4)
∆f
= 2πf c t + sin (2πf m t )
fm
∆f
β= (5)
fm
And
From Eq 6 we see that, in a physical sense, the parameter represents the phase deviation
of the FM wave: that is, the maximum departure of the angular argument θ (t ) from the
angle 2πf c t of the unmodulated carrier
s (t ) = Ac cos(2πf c t ) cos[β sin( 2πf m t )] − Ac sin( 2πf c t ) sin [β sin( 2πf m t )] (2)
From this expanded from, we see that the in-phase and quadrature components of the FM
waves s(t) for the case of sinusoidal modulation are as follows.
s1 (t ) = s1 (t ) + js Q (t )
(5)
= Ac exp[Jβ sin (2πf m t )]
The complex envelope s(t) retains complete information about the modulation process.
Indeed, we may readily express the FM wave s(t) in terms of the complex envelope s(t)
by writing
∞
s (t ) = ∑c
n = −∞
n exp( j 2πnf m t ) (7)
− 12 f
cn = f m ∫
−1
2 fm
m
s (t ) exp(− j 2πnf m t ) dt
(8)
− 12 f
= fm A c∫−1
2 fm
m
exp[ jβ sin( 2πnf m t ) − − j 2 π n f m t ] dt
x = 2πf m t (9)
Ac π
cn =
2π ∫ π exp[ j(β sin x − nx )] dx
−
(10)
The integral on the right side of Eq 10 is recognized as the nth order Bessel function of
the first kind and argument β . This function is commonly denoted by the symbol Jn(β)
that is
1 π
cn =
2π ∫ π exp[ j(β sin x − nx )] dx
−
(11)
c n = Ac j n (β ) (12)
∞
s (t ) = Ac ∑ j (β ) exp( j 2πnf t )
n = −∞
n m (13)
∞
s (t ) = Ac Re ∑ j n (β ) exp[ j 2π ( f c + nf m )t ] (14)
n =−∞
Interchanging the order of summation and evaluating the real part of the right side of Eq
14, we get
∞
s (t ) = Ac ∑ j n (β ) cos[2π ( f c + nf m )t ] (15)
n= −∞
This is the desired from for the Fourier series representation of the single-stone FM wave
s(t) for an arbitrary value of . The discrete spectrum of s(t) is obtained by taking the
Fourier transforms of both sides of Eq (15)thus
∞
S(f)=Ac ∑ j (β ) [∆( ( f − f
n = −∞
n c − nf m ) +∆( ( f + f c + nf m ) ] (16)
Fig.1 shows the plot between the Bessel function versus the modulation index for n 0, 1,
2, 3, 4. These plots show that for fixed n, alternates between positive and negative values
for increasing and that approaches zero as approaches infinity. Note also that for fixed
we have
Narrow-Band FM
For small values of the modulation index compared to one radian, the FM wave assumes
a narrow-band form consisting essentially of a carrier, an upper side-frequency
component, and a lower side-frequency component.
This property follows from the face that for small values of β , we have
j0 (β ) ≅ 1
β
j0 (β ) ≅ (1)
2
j0 (β ) ≅ 0, n >1
The approximations indicated in Eqs 1 are closely justified for values of the modulation
index defined byβ ≤ 0.3 rad. Thus, substituting Eqs 1 in Eq.2
∞
s (t ) = Ac ∑ j n (β ) cos[2π ( f c + nf m )t ] (2)
n= −∞
We get
βAc β Ac
s (t ) ≅ Ac cos(2πf c t ) + cos[2π ( f c + f m )t ] − cos[2π ( f c − f m )t ] (3)
2 2
This equation shows that for small β, the FM wave s(t) may be closely approximated by
the sum of a carrier of amplitude Ac, an upper side-band frequency component of
amplitudeβAc/2 and a lower side-frequency component of amplitude βAc/2and phase-
shift equal to 180o. An FM wave so characterized is said to be narrow-band.
approaches 2 f m . We may thus define an approximate rule for the transmission bandwidth
1
B ≅ 2∆f + 2 f m = 2∆f 1 + (1)
β
Table shows the total number of significant side-frequencies (including both the upper
and lower side-frequencies) for different values of β, calculated on the 1% basis just
explained. The transmission bandwidth B calculated using this procedure can be
presented in the form of a universal curve by normalizing it with respect to the frequency
deviation ∆f , and then plotting it versus β. This curve is shown in Fig.1 , which is drawn
as a best fit through the set of points obtained by using Table 1 in Fig.1 we note that as
the modulation index β is increased, the bandwidth occupied by the significant side-
frequencies drops toward that over which the carrier frequency actually deviates. This
means that small values of the modulation index β are relatively more extravagant in
transmission bandwidth than are the larger values of β.
Table-1
FM Generation
Fig.1b)frequency multiplier
Indirect FM :
Consider first the generation of a narrow-band FM wave. To do this, we begin
with the expression for an FM wave s1(t) for the general case of a modulating wave m(t),
which is written in the form
Where f1 is the carrier frequency and A1 is the carrier amplitude. The angular argument
of s1(t) is related to m(t) by
t
φ1 (t ) = 2πk1 ∫ m(t ) dt (2)
0
Where k1 is the frequency sensitivity of the modulator. Provided that the angle is small
compared to one radian for all t, we may use the following approximations:
cos[φ (t )] ≅ 1 (3)
sin [φ (t )] ≅ φ (t ) (4)
Eq 5 defines a narrow-band FM wave. Indeed, we may use this equation to set up the
scheme shown in Fig 1a for the generation of a narrow-band FM wave; the scaling factor
2πk1 is taken care of by the product modulator. Moreover, bearing in mind the
relationship that exists between frequency modulation and phase modulation , we see that
the part of the frequency modulator that lies inside the dashed rectangle in Fig 1a
1. The envelope contains a residual amplitude modulation and, therefore, varies with
time.
2. For a sinusoidal modulating wave, the phase of the FM wave contains harmonic
distortion in the form of third and higher-order harmonics of the modulation
frequency fm
sensitivity k1 of the narrow-band frequency modulator and the maximum amplitude of the
modulating wave m(t). The motivation for using the band-pass filter in Fig 1b.
Specifically, the filter is designed with two aims in mind.
1. To pass the FM wave centered at the carrier frequency nf1 and with frequency
deviation n ∆f1,
Thus, connecting the narrow-band frequency modulator and the frequency multiplier
as depicted in Fig 1c, we may generate a wideband FM wave s(t) with carrier
frequency f c , = nf 1 and frequency deviation, as desired. Specifically, we may write
Where
k f = nk1 (8)
In other words, the wideband frequency modulator of Fig 1c has a frequency sensitivity n
times that of the narrow-band frequency modulator of Fig 1a, where n is the frequency
multiplication ratio. In Fig 1c shows a crystal-controlled oscillator as the source of
carrier; this is done for frequency stability.
Direct FM
Lecture Notes 34
1
f1 (t ) = (1)
2π ( L1 + L2 )C (t )
Where C(t) is the total capacitance of the fixed capacitor and the variable-voltage
capacitor, and L1 and L2 are the two inductances in the frequency determining network.
Assume that for a modulating wave m(t) the capacitance C(t) is expressed as follows
C (t ) = C 0 + k c m(t ) (2)
Where C0 is the total capacitance in the absence of modulation, and Kc is the variable
capacitor’s sensitivity to voltage change. Substituting Eq 2 in 1, we get
−1 2
k
f1 (t ) = f 0 1 − c m(t ) (3)
C0
1
f0 = (4)
2π C 0 (L1 + L2 )
Provide that the maximum change in capacitance produced by the modulating wave is
small compared with the unmodulated capacitance C0, we may approximate Eq 3 as
follows
−1 2
k
f1 (t ) = f 0 1 + c m(t ) (5)
2C 0
Define
f 0kc
kf = (6)
2C 0
We then obtain the following relation for the instantaneous frequency of the oscillator
f1 (t ) = f 0 + k f m(t ) (7)
Fig 2 A Feed back scheme for the frequency stabilization of a frequency modulator
Considering an idealized form of the circuit shown in fig.1 we introduce the notion of an
ideal slope circuit that is characterized by a purely imaginary transfer function, varying
linearly with frequency inside a prescribed interval. Such a circuit includes the
differentiator as a special case.
To be specific, consider the transfer function depicted in Fig 3a, which is defined by
B B B
j 2πa f − f c + , fc − ≤ f ≤ fc +
2 2 2
B B B
H 1 ( f ) = j 2πa f + f c + , − fc − ≤ f ≤ − fc + (1)
2 2 2
0 elsewhere
Where a is a constant. We wish to evaluate the response of this slope circuit, denoted by
s1(t), for an input FM signal s(t) of carrier frequency fc and transmission bandwidth B. It
is assumed that the spectrum of s(t) is essentially zero outside the frequency band . For
evaluation of the response s1(t), which involves replacing the slope circuit with an
equivalent low-pass filter and driving this filter with the complex envelope of the input
FM wave s(t)
Let H1(f) denote the complex transfer function of the slope circuit defined by Fig
3 a. This complex transfer function is related to H1(f) by
H 1 ( f − f c ) = H 1 ( f ), f >0 (2)
Let s1(t) denote the complex envelope of the response of the slope circuit defined
by Fig 3a. Then we may express the Fourier transform of s1(t) as
s (t ) = H 1 ( f )S ( f )
B B B
j 2πa f + S ( f ), ≤ f ≤ (6)
= 2 2 2
0
elsewhere
Where S(f) is the Fourier transform of s(t). The multiplication of the Fourier transform of
a signal by the factor is equivalent to differentiating the signal in the time domain. We
thus deduce from Eq 6 that
ds (t )
s1 (t ) = a + jπB s (t ) (7)
dt
Substituting Eq 5 in 7, we get
The signal s2(t) is a hybrid-modulated wave in which both the amplitude and frequency of
the carrier wave vary with the message signal m(t). However, provided that we choose
2k f
m(t ) < 1
B
for all t, then we may use an envelope detector to recover the amplitude variations and
thus, except for a bias term, obtain the original message signal. The resulting envelope
detector output is therefore.
2k f
s1 (t ) = πBaAc m(t ) (9)
B
The bias term πBaAc in the right side of Eq.9 is proportional the slope a of the
transfer function of the slope circuit. This suggests that the bias may be removed by
subtracting from the envelope detector output s1 (t ) the output of a second envelope
detector preceded by the complementary slope circuit with a transfer function H2(f) as
described in Fig 3 c. That is, the respective complex transfer functions of the two slope
circuits are related by
H 2 ( f ) = H 1 (− f ) (10)
Let s2(t) denote the response of the complementary slope circuit produced by the
incoming FM wave s(t). Then, following a procedure similar to that described herein, we
find that the envelope of s2(t) is
2k f
s1 (t ) = πBaAc 1 − m(t ) (11)
B
Where s2(t) is the complex envelope of the signal s2(t). The difference between the two
envelope in Eqs 9 and 11 is
s 0 (t ) = s1 (t ) − s 2 (t )
(12)
= 4πk1 aAc m(t )
1. The spectrum of the input FM wave s(t) is not exactly zero for frequencies outside
the range
2. The tuned filter outputs are not strictly band-limited, and so some distortion is
introduced by the low-pass RC filters following the diodes in the envelope
detectors.
3. The tuned filter characteristics are not linear over the whole frequency band of the
input FM wave s(t).
Zero-crossing Detector
The detector exploits the property that the instantaneous frequency of an FM wave is
approximately given by
1
fi ≅ (1)
2∆t
Condition 1 means that the message signal m(t) is essentially constant inside the interval
T. Condition 2 ensures that a reasonable number of zero crossing of the FM wave occurs
inside the interval T. The FM waveform shown in Fig 2 illustrates these two conditions.
Let no denote the number of zero crossings inside the interval T. We may then express the
time ∆t between adjacent zero crossing as
T
∆t = (2)
n0
Fig 2 FM waveform
n0
fi ≅ (3)
2t
Since, by definition, the instantaneous frequency is linearly related to the message signal
m(t), we see from Eq 3 that m(t) can be recovered from a knowledge of no. Fig 1 is the
block diagram of a simplified from of the zero-crossing detector based on this principle.
The limiter produces a square-wave version of the input FM wave, the limiting of FM
waves. The pulse generator produces short pulses at the positive-going as well as
negative-going edges of the limiter output. Finally, the integrator performs the averaging
over the interval T as indicated in Eq 3, thereby reproducing the original message signal
m(t) at its output.
t
φ1 (t ) = 2πk f ∫ m(t ) dt (2)
0
Where kf is the frequency sensitivity of the frequency modulator. Let the VCO output be
defined by
r (t ) = Av cos[2πf c t + φ 2 (t )] (3)
Where Av is the amplitude. With a control voltage v(t) applied to the VCO input, we have
t
φ 2 (t ) = 2πk v ∫ v(t ) dt (4)
0
Where kv is the frequency sensitivity of the VCO, measured in hertz per volt. The
incoming FM wave s(t) and the VCO output r(t) are applied to the multiplier, producing
two components:
The high-frequency component is eliminated by the low-pass action of the filter and the
VCO. Therefore, discarding the high-frequency component, the input to the loop filter is
given by
φ e (t ) = φ1 (t ) − φ 2 (t )
t (7)
= φ1 (t ) − 2πk v ∫ v(t ) dt
0
The loop filter operates on its input e(t) to produce the output
∞
v(t ) = ∫ e(τ )h(t − τ ) dτ (8)
−∞