2004 Rules On Notarial Practice
2004 Rules On Notarial Practice
DEFINITION OF TERMS:
Commission refers to the grant of authority to perform notarial acts and to the written
evidence of the authority.
Notary Public and/or Notary refer to any person commissioned to perform official acts under
these Rules.
Principal refers to a person appearing before the notary public whose act is the subject of
notarization
A person commissioned as notary public may perform notarial acts in any place within the
territorial jurisdiction of the commissioning court for a period of two (2) years commencing
the first day of January of the year in which the commissioning is made, unless earlier
revoked or the notary public has resigned under these Rules and the Rules of Court
POWERS:
PROHIBITIONS:
(a) A notary public shall not perform a notarial act outside his regular place of work or
business; provided, however, that on certain exceptional occasions or situations, a notarial
act may be performed at the request of the parties in the following sites located within his
territorial jurisdiction:
(1) public offices, convention halls, and similar places where oaths of office may be
administered;
(2) public function areas in hotels and similar places for the signing of instruments or
documents requiring notarization;
(3) hospitals and other medical institutions where a party to an instrument or
document is confined for treatment; and
(4) any place where a party to an instrument or document requiring notarization is
under detention.
(b) A person shall not perform a notarial act if the person involved as signatory to the
instrument or document -
(1) is not in the notary's presence personally at the time of the notarization; and
(2) is not personally known to the notary public or otherwise identified by the notary
public through competent evidence of identity as defined by these Rules.
DISQUALIFICATIONS:
(a) The Executive Judge shall revoke a notarial commission for any ground on which an
application for a commission may be denied.
(b) In addition, the Executive Judge may revoke the commission of, or impose appropriate
administrative sanctions upon, any notary public who:
Atty. Revilla, Jr. did not deny but admitted Jandoquile's material allegations. The issue,
according to Atty. Revilla, Jr., is whether the single act of notarizing the complaint-affidavit of
relatives within the fourth civil degree of affinity and, at the same time, not requiring them to
present valid identification cards is a ground for disbarment. Atty. Revilla, Jr. submits that his
act is not a ground for disbarment. He also says that he acts as counsel of the three affiants;
thus, he should be considered more as counsel than as a notary public when he notarized their
complaint-affidavit. He did not require the affiants to present valid identification cards since he
knows them personally.
ISSUES:
1. WON Atty. Revilla violated Section 3(c), Rule IV of the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice?
2. WON Atty Revilla violated Section 2(b), Rule IV of the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice
HELD: Yes, Section 3(c), Rule IV of the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice clearly disqualifies Atty.
Revilla from notarizing the complaint-affidavit, from performing the notarial act, since two of
the affiants or principals are his relatives within the fourth civil degree of affinity. Given the
clear provision of the disqualification rule, it behooved upon Atty. Revilla, Jr. to act with
prudence and refuse notarizing the document. The court added that they cannot agree with the
respondent’s proposition to consider him to have acted more as counsel of the affiants, not as
notary public, when he notarized the complaint-affidavit. The notarial certificate at the bottom
of the complaint-affidavit shows his signature as a notary public, with a notarial commission
valid until December 31, 2012.
As to the second issue, the court held that no violation was committed in case where the notary
public knows the affiants personally, he need not require them to show their valid identification
cards.
In this case, Heneraline Brosas is a sister of Atty. Revilla, Jr.'s wife; Herizalyn Brosas Pedrosa is
his wife's sister-in-law; and Elmer Alvarado is the live-in houseboy of the Brosas family. Atty.
Revilla, Jr. knows the three affiants personally. Thus, he was justified in no longer requiring
them to show valid identification cards.