Introduction To Management Chapter 4
Introduction To Management Chapter 4
Specific Objective:
After completing this lesson, the trainee will be able
to give a general overview about the organizing
function.
The management process starts through planning i.e. in planning, objectives that
are going to be achieved are identified, established and courses of actions are
also determined. The managerial functions of planning and organizing are
intimately related. Organizing begins with and governed by plans, then the
manager continues his activity by:
FORMAL INFORMAL
ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION
St. Mary’s Universty / Dep. Management/ Introduction to Management 2
Formation Consciously formed Spontaneous and
and tends to be stable dynamic based on
interest, belief,
background, etc
Finally, the management should always give proper attention about the informal
organization that exists in the enterprise. The management should know the
effect of the informal organization on the enterprise performance and how to
influence the informal organization and how to direct their activities to the
accomplishment of the common objectives.
IMPORTANCE OF ORGANIZAING
Specific Objective:
2) Grouping of the work: - division of work creates the need for coordination. In
order to provide for a smooth flow of work, all closely related and similar
activities must be grouped together. Thus, departments and divisions are
created under the direction of a manager.
3) Establishing formal reporting relationships: - in order to secure compliance
to organizational directives, reporting relationships must be specified. Once
formal relationships are established, it would help individuals to know what
must be done, how it must be done, to whom the matters must be referred
and how particular jobs relate to one another etc. Without formal
relationships it would be difficult to process the total because there is no way
to know how the work is progressing, is supposed to handle the work, where
the work has to be coordinated so as to achieve enterprise objectives. As soon
as the formal relationships are established, they would provide a framework
for assigning duties and responsibilities to individuals in an unambiguous
fashion.
Specific Objective:
After completing this lesson, the trainee will be able to describe the
following concepts as they apply to organizations: power and
4.5.2 DEPARTMENTATION
There are several keyways in which an organization may decide about the
pattern that will be used in grouping the various, similar activities performed.
The most common bases of department used by organizations are
I. Functional Departmentation
President
Vice president
President
Vice president
- The firm will get the chance to have face to face communication with the
local customer
- It reduces heavy transport cost
- It provides the manager to improve their skill in various fields
- Usage of regional resources at reasonable cost is possible
- Accounts are prepared in area-wise, so the profitability of each area is
clearly known to the management etc.
- Because of the distance, it is very difficult to have control over the branches
from the head quarter.
- It gives rise to the problem of communication
- Similar activities may be done in the various regional divisions, which leads
to duplication of works etc.
III. Departmetnation by product
President
Vice president
(Production Manger)
President
Vice president
V. Departmentation by Process
President
Vice President
(Manufacturin
Centralization means that the authority to take for most decision is concentrated
at the top of the managerial hierarchy. Centralization is the systematic and
consistent reservation of authority at central points within the organization. In
centralization little delegation of authority is the rule; power and discretion are
concentrated at the top level. The control and decision making resides at the top.
Most organization starts out with centralization of authority; such an
arrangement helps the manager to be in touch with all operations. Centralization
is usually adopted by small scale organizations but as the organization becomes
more complex in terms of increasing size, diversification of activity etc then there
will be a need to move the decision making centers to the operating levels. Thus
the larger the size of an organization is the more urgent is the need for
decentralization. The advantages of centralization are power and prestige is
provided to the executives, uniformity of policies, practices and decisions are
fostered. Full utilization of the main office and information specialists is
promoted, due in large part to their proximity to the top management level,
highly qualified specialists can be utilized, the danger of actions and drifting and
getting off course is reduced etc.
Absolute cent (pure cent) is not practical except in very small firms. Absolute
power would mean that subordinates have no duties and authority.
ADVANTAGES OF DECENTRALIZATION
DISADVANTAGES OF DECENTRALIZATION
All of us have lived with the concept of authority since birth. First our parents
were authority figures, then schoolteachers, principals finally employers (bosses)
all remind us that we live in a society with distinct authority relationships exists.
Many scholars argue that the concept of power and authority are synonymous,
while others contend that they are distinctly different. Authority may be viewed
as the right to do something. It is the formal right of decision and command. The
manager's authority turns him into a decision-maker on issues affecting the
business. Power is a broader concept than authority.
3) Reward power: -is the opposite of coercive power in that it is derived from
the ability to grant rewards for compliance with the superior's wishes .e. good
grade,
Authority Power
Therefore it should be noted that authority must be carefully tailored to fit the
responsibilities involved. Failure to strike a happy balance between the two may
be frustrating to superiors and subordinates as well.
Accountability: - means that the people with authority and responsibility are
subjected to reporting and justifying task outcomes to those above them in the
chain of command. It is a mechanism at which authority and responsibility
brought into alignment. Subordinates must be aware that they are accountable
for a task and must accept the responsibility and accountability for performing.
3) Creation of obligation: - the third aspect is the obligation on the part of the
subordinates to perform their duties satisfactorily. The person assigned the
task is morally responsible to do his best since he has willingly accepted these
tasks. Obligation is a personal concern for the task. Even if the subordinate
gets part of the task done through other people, the obligation and the
accountability still lies with the subordinate. According to Newman, Summer
and Warren "By accepting an assignment a subordinate in effect gives his
superior a promise to do his best in carrying out his duties. Having taken a
job, he is morally bound to complete it. He can be held accountable for
results".
It reduces burden on the manager, It provides the manager with more time,
which can be spend in the external environment, It enables the manager to be
relieved from the operational work and to concentrate and expertise on other
important activities, It frees the top manager from operational issues
Delegation leads to better decision since the subordinates are closer to the
situation they have clear and complete information
It states that no single executive should have more people looking to him for
guidance and leadership than he can reasonably be expected to serve. To
overcome the biological limitations, every manager has to delegate work to as
many subordinates as he can effectively manage. Thus, span of management is
From this relationship it can be seen that with just three subordinates there are 18
relationships and with four subordinates, these relationship number 44, and
these relationships jump to 100 when the number of subordinates is increased to
five. Therefore, no executive should attempt to control over large number of
subordinates whose work interlocks.
Different attempts and formulas were made in order to determine the span of
control but the modern approach has shifted away the finding of universally
acceptable magic formula. The current view is that span is more flexible, the
number of employees, which has to work under a manager, depends upon
different factors. Therefore in order to determine the span of control under a
manager these common factors should be considered.
Availability of time for supervision: - if the manager spend too much time
in planning and organizing, then he will not be having enough time to supervise
large number of employees under him. Beside the above the degree of interaction
required, the extent of standardized etc should be considered while fixing the
span of control.