Fexam 19952
Fexam 19952
Examiners’ Report
Four out seven candidates passed this examination. The following comments are
provided by the examiners to assist supervisors of training and candidates for future
examinations.
Written
PAPER I. Overall four candidates passed this paper. One candidates passed each of
the nine questions and Scenario I presented the most difficulty.
Scenario I
A four year old boy presents in the emergency department. He is sitting on his
mother’s knee and appears to have airway obstruction and respiratory distress.
The presumptive diagnosis is acute epiglottis.
This is a life threatening emergency that the candidates are expected to be able to
manage.
Question 1
The anatomy is straight forward. However, only four out of seven candidates passed
this question. A good answer should touch on the structure of epiglottis and its
relation with the upper airway in a four year old child. The more cephalic position of
the larynx at C2-3 vs C3-4 in adult and the floppiness of epiglottis should be
mentioned. The surrounding structures can be listed under the subheadings of
anterior, posterior, and lateral relations. For an anatomy question, a diagram is
helpful. Nerve supply, arterial supply, venous drainage and their relation with the
upper airway will score extra marks.
Question 2
The longer term measures should be considered under the headings of supportive
(airway, ventilation and intracenous fluid) and specific (appropriate antibiotics)
management in the intensive care unit.
Scenario II
This was a reasonably straightforward question with six candidates passing Question 4
but the medical management of hypercalcaemia was poorly answered with only four
candidates passing.
Scenario III
A 55 year old previously healthy patient with right renal stone received general
anaesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. The operation was quite
difficult and lasted 6 hours. At the end of the surgery, the patient appeared to
have adequate ventilation, but remained drowsy. The trachea was extubated
and the patient transferred to the recovery ward.
7) The patient’s SpO2 decreases to 70% after 5 minutes in recovery. What are
the possible explanations?
8) The patient remains drowsy and confused after one hour in recovery despite
improvement in oxygen saturation. Explain what you would do.
9) In the ward, the patient complains to the surgeon that he heard conversation
during the operation. How should this patient be managed?
PAPER II. Overall four candidates passed this paper. Two candidates passed each of
the nine questions. The questions which were poorly answered were Questions 1, 8
and 9. The questions answered the best were Questions 2, 3 and 6.
QUESTION 1
Points to be raised
1. Definition: less than 3.5 mmol/litre of blood
2. The clinical significance of conditions causing hypokalaemia associated with
hyperacute, acute or chronic loss:
a. abnormal body losses such as gastrointestinal associated with vomiting,
nasogastric tube aspiration, diarrhoea, bowel prep etc
b. Renal associated with diuretic use corticosteroids renal disease such as renal
tubular acidosis and
c. Syndromes such as Conn’s Syndrome, Cushing Syndrome.
d. Compartmental shifts such as alkalosis associated with hyperventilation, the
use of insulin and rarely hypokalaemia periodic paralysis.
e. Inadequate intake, dietary or intravenous.
3. Clinical features including arrhythmia’s, weakness, failure of reversal of muscle
relaxants, depression, ileus, or coma.
4. Replacement should be oral if possible with potassium chloride being used in the
presence of a metabolic alkalosis. Intravenous use should not exceed 0.5
mmol/kg/hr which should take place under ECG monitoring. Significance of this
condition rarely leads to the delay in operation as treatment is simple and
effective and should take place under ECG monitoring.
QUESTION 2
This question requires a list but elaboration on details of major headings were
rewarded with additional marks. Candidates who gave answers which were not
related to ambulatory surgery were penalised for this.
The advantages clearly relate to the avoidance of complications of general
anaesthesia including central sedation, airway management and post operative
recovery. Other advantages include avoidance of nausea and vomiting resulting from
general anaesthesia, the advantage of intra and post-operative analgesia which may
extend well into post operative period, early ambulation for regional techniques not
requiring spinal or epidural anaesthesia, and the avoidance of thromboembolic
complications. Other advantages are having a conscious and cooperative patient
during procedures and often early discharge for regional blocks. Central nervous
system monitoring is easier because of the conscious patient.
Specific advantages for minor procedures such as limb fractures, removal of
limps and bumps were rewarded if mentioned.
Disadvantages include the higher failure rate of regional blocks and the
expertise required to place these. The problems of prolonged blockade which may
result in delayed discharge of an ambulatory patient. The problems of urinary
retention, particularly with major blocks such as spinal and epidurals and of course
problems specifically of headache with relation to spinal and occasionally epidural
anaesthesia. The disadvantage of still requiring full monitoring in a fasting patient
were mentioned by no candidates. Patient preference is also important here on both
sides of this equation. A disadvantage is restrictions placed on the surgeon regarding
the use of gentle techniques in the area of block. In general this question was well
answered.
QUESTION 3
Outline clinical signs and radiological changes in the diagnosis of cervical spine
injury.
In this question the examiners expected the clinical signs to commence with
some statement about the importance of the history of injury and a comment about
associated injuries and their significance on the likelihood of major cervical spine
injury. Candidates were expected to note the importance of neck tenderness, pain and
lack of movement and the importance of a palpable deformity such as a step deformity
or the prominence of a spinous process. Lack of neck mobility, the presence of
oedema or ecchymosis and muscle spasm, perhaps together with an abnormal head
position, would all be signs of neck injury. Tracheal tenderness or deviation, perhaps
associated with a retropharyngeal haematoma, would be another clinical sign.
Neurological signs may include signs of musculo-skeletal weakness, sensory
disturbances, loss of reflex or respiratory difficulties associated with a high cervical
lesion involving the diaphrahm or chest walls paralysis due to lower cervical spine
injury. Comment should have been made of autonomic dysfunction particularly
bladder, bowel or priapism and the presence of cardiac sympathetic blockade leading
to hypotension and bradycardia.
Acute spinal syndrome should have been mentioned with its associated
hypotension and vasodilation.
Radiological changes should describe the necessity for all seven cervical
vertebrae to be visualised and then specific injuries such as an arch injury of C1
(Jefferson fracture) fractures of the odontoid process as well as subluxation of C2 on
C1 (hangman fracture). Other radiological signs may involve loss of alignment of the
cervical vertebrae being diagnosed by a lack of continuity of one of the three major
ligamented structures. The presence of soft tissue injury particularly associated with
post laryngeal haematoma, overriding of the facets or a teardrop fracture. Comments
should have been made about the associated radiological diagnosis of skull fracture
and the presence of susceptible pathology such as cervical spondylosis.
In general this question was passed by most candidates though the standard of
answer was very variable. Most candidates covered the clinical side of things
reasonably well but the specifics of the radiological changes were scant. It is of note
that any candidate who had completed the EMST course should have had no difficulty
with this question.
QUESTION 4
List the predisposing factors and adverse effects of post-operative nausea and
vomiting.
This question was not answered well with many candidates not mentioning pre-
disposing factors such as opioids either as pre-medication, intra operatively or post
operatively, nor mentioning unrelieved pain as causes of nausea and vomiting.
Several candidates did not even mention any drugs at all where as this question was
best answered by listing patient factors, anaesthetic factors and surgical factors.
Adverse effects should have raised the problems associated with fluid aspects
of vomiting such as loss of potassium, hydrogen ions and fluid itself; the problems of
raised venous, intraocular, intracranial and gastric pressures, including ruptured
oesophagus. Other problems are those associated with bleeding following head and
neck procedures as well as delayed discharge, patient discomfort and the occasional
complications of management.
QUESTION 5
This question was poorly answered and candidates who gave lists without
attempting any discussion were penalised. Candidates were expected to state that the
main use of ECG monitoring was to monitor rhythm and its changes, heart rate and
ischaemia. Reward was given when examples were quoted and candidates were
expected to orientate each of these for example by describing lead placement and the
importance of the diagnostic mode on a monitor as well as the use of CM5 lead.
Candidates were expected to discuss the limitations of ECG monitoring particularly
with its poor record for critical incident monitoring.
Most answers were very brief and scant with information and irrelevancies such
as the problems of irritation due to stickiness of the electrodes.
QUESTION 6
You are resuscitating a patient in the operating room following rapid blood loss.
You notice that a unit of blood which has been partly transfused is not the
patient’s blood group. Describe how you would manage this situation.
This question required that the transfusion be immediately stopped with a quick
clerical check and if the group is not O negative then should be immediately replaced
and treatment instituted for haemolytic reactions. The treatment should involve the
management of hypotension with fluids and ionotropes, monitoring of central venous
pressure etc, the protection of the kidney in acute renal failure with fluids, frusemide
and mannitol. There should also be management of DIC which occurs in these cases
with replacement of blood products and monitoring of bleeding and coagulation
profiles. There must be support of the circulatory system with oxygen
supplementation, communication with the surgeon and completion of or cessation of
surgery as soon as possible. The patient should be transferred to ICU for follow-up
care and the management of delayed reactions.
In general this question was answered reasonably though one candidate thought
that the problem was insignificant compared to the need for blood originally being
transfused. The management of DIC was not well handled by this group but most
appreciated the problems of circulatory and renal failure.
QUESTION 7
QUESTION 8
Indications:
1) Pain:
Renal colic
Obliterative artery disease
Paget’s disease of bone
Reflex sympathetic dystrophy
other causalgia : phantom limb pain, frostbite
2) Increase Blood Flow:
Vasospastic diseases
Frostbite
Obliterative artery disease
With vascular surgery
3) Improve drainage of local edema
Technique:
Pre-op preparation
Needle placement, multiple for lytic block (L2, L3, L4)
Check with Image Intensifier
Check with local anaesthetics
Chemical block : alcohol or phenol
Post-op management
QUESTION 9
You are in the process of placing an epidural catheter placement for caesarean
section in a patient with obstructed labour, who is otherwise well and has had a
normal pregnancy. The obstetrician notices a sustained fetal bradycardia of 60
beats per minute and wishes to proceed immediately with the caesarean section.
Describe how you would proceed and justify the steps to be taken.
Oral
Five candidates passed the oral section. There were three tables of two examiners and
30 minutes was spent at each table. Half the time of each viva was spent discussing
the management of a clinical scenario. The three scenarios were:
The other half of each viva was used to discuss individual topics. The list of topics
included:
Clinical
Four candidates passed the clinical which was composed of ten stations each of 10
minutes duration with 2 minutes before each station when some preliminary
information was given. There were also rest stations where nothing was required
from the candidate.
One History: A patient with myasthenia gravis. A translator for English was available
if the candidate did not wish to take the history in Cantonese.
One Communication: Explanation to a relative of the anaesthetic choices for an
elderly confused patient requiring hip surgery. A translator for English was available
if the candidate did not wish to speak in Cantonese.
One Resuscitation: Advanced life support for persistent ventricular fibrillation. This
was a difficult station requiring candidates to lead the resuscitation. Only one
candidate passed.
One Anatomy: Regional anaesthesia for surgery on the hand and ankle block for
anaesthesia of the foot. Only one candidate failed this station.
One Equipment: Checking an anaesthetic machine and Bain circuit. Only one
candidate passed this station.
Two Investigations: ECGs, CXRs, capnograph and lung function tests. These two
stations were generally well done.