Critical Review of Corrosion Protection by Cold Spray Coatings
Critical Review of Corrosion Protection by Cold Spray Coatings
spray coatings
S. M. Hassani-Gangaraj1,2, A. Moridi1,2 and M. Guagliano1∗
Nevertheless, when the objective is the overall perform- effects of less porosity. Corrosion performance of cold
ance including hardness, adhesion strength and corrosion, sprayed titanium coating in sea water was compared to
Al–5Mg powders appeared to provide the best barrier the performance of the bulk material by open circuit
coating for Mg alloys.35 potential (OCP) survey and potentiodynamic polarisation
Titanium can provide corrosion protection for steel. measurements.37 Lower circuit potential and higher cor-
Cold spraying titanium powders on carbon steel substrate rosion current were obtained for titanium coating. Pre-
in wide range of deposition pressures and temperatures sences of porosity in the coating resulted in more active
provided better corrosion resistance in NaCl solution as and less corrosion resistant surface.
compared to the substrate itself.36 Polishing as sprayed Zinc and its alloy coatings have been widely used for
titanium coating peeled the rough outer layer including cathodic protection of steel. Owing to its negative cor-
small pores and decreased the surface area leading to con- rosion potential, zinc coating corrodes in preference to
siderable improvement of corrosion resistance. Neverthe- the steel substrate. At the same time, it is crucial that
less, the corrosion current of the polished coatings was zinc coating demonstrates low corrosion rate such that
still larger than bulk titanium. Lower deposition pressure it could provide long term protection. Cold sprayed zinc
leads to more porous structure with less dissolved oxygen onto mild steel in as sprayed and heat treated (150°C
concentration in the pores than in the surrounding for 1 h) states were examined in NaCl solution.38 Poten-
environment. This promotes oxygen concentration differ- tiodynamic curves showed that heat treatment of the coat-
ence corrosion. Increasing deposition temperature of tita- ing reduced the corrosion current by a factor of 7–10 over
nium powders from 350 to 500 and 650°C decreased the the whole duration of exposure (72 h). Heat treatment
porosity level in the coating. Nevertheless, examinations also shifted the corrosion potential towards less negative
of the coated samples showed that the lowest corrosion value. The reason was that numerous weakly bonded
current in polarisation curves corresponded to 500°C. splats, cracks and pores observed in the as sprayed coat-
This was due to increased oxygen content in the coating ing converted to better bonded splats, lower and much
with increased temperature that dominated the beneficial thinner cracks in the heat treated sample.
Glassy powder (Al90.05Y4.4Ni4.3Co0.9Sc0.35) was suc- Cold versus thermal spray: corrosion
cessfully cold sprayed onto Al6061 such that the coating
retained its amorphous structure with a few nanocrystals
behaviour
embedded in amorphous matrix.39 The potentiodynamic Several characteristics of cold spray as compared to ther-
polarisation curves of the coating and substrate were mal spray are of particular interest for its use in develop-
obtained in 0.01 and 0.1 N NaCl solutions. The coating ing corrosion resistant surface layer. Cold spray is
exhibited lower passive current as compared to the sub- deposited with feedstock particles in the solid state, and
strate. The corrosion rate of the substrate was five times no intrinsic defects due to the liquefaction and solidifica-
higher than that of coating, indicating excellent cor- tion processes are developed. This attribute leads to dense
rosion resistance of aluminium bulk metallic glass. Two coatings with low porosity that is desired for corrosion
main features of metallic glass coating were responsible protection. The tendency for high temperature reactions
for such high corrosion resistance. First, the amorphous and oxidation is also much lower in cold spray. This is
nature of the coating led to chemical homogeneity hin- an important consideration particularly in case of galva-
dering formation of localised galvanic cells and the nic protection, where it is desirable to have the superficial
onset of corrosion. Second, accelerated passive film for- layer in the form of pure and oxidisable elements. In
mation might have occurred due to enhanced diffusion addition, since the coating build-up is accompanied by
of passive elements in the nanocrystal containing amor- peening effect of incoming particles, compressive residual
phous structure. Moreover, the conventional phenom- stresses can be developed during cold spray, both in the
enon of pit formation for Al nanocrystallites was not coating and in the substrate. Thermal spray, on the
observed in the amorphous matrix. The reason is that other hand, imparts tensile residual stresses, and there-
amorphous matrix is rich in substitutional elements sur- fore, the tendency for delamination of the coating from
rounding the nanocrystals. Therefore, it requires a higher the substrate in thicker coating is higher. There are also
potential than pure Al to maintain stable pit growth some disadvantages for cold spray. These include non-
state. portability of many cold spray units, powder handling
Stellite alloy is a range of cobalt–chromium alloys to minimise the risk of combustion and cost efficiency
designed for wear resistance. It may also contain tungsten of the process. In this section, corrosion performance of
or molybdenum and a small but important amount of car- cold spray and thermal spray coatings are compared.
bon. Despite the difficulty of its plastic deformation, Hot corrosion/oxidation test by aqueous solution of
optimisation of cold spray parameters was shown to be Na2SO4 and NaCl at 705°C was performed on cold and
able to deposit stellite-6 coating with minimised porosity plasma sprayed tantalum on steel substrate. While orig-
and excellent adhesion to low alloy carbon steel sub- inal homogeneous fine grained structure of the cold
strate.40 Plastic strains in stellite powder were mainly sprayed substrate was unchanged, remarkable microstruc-
accommodated by twining rather than dislocation slip tural alteration (grain coarsening) of the plasma sprayed
and phase transformation. High temperature oxidation substrate occurred due to infiltration of air and corrosive
test in air atmosphere showed that the hexagonal phase salt. Almost identical polarisation behaviour with clear
starts to appear at 600°C, and coexists with the cubic passivation in KOH solution was reported for bulk and
phase up to 900°C. Cr2O3 with excellent protective prop- cold spray coated tantalum on aluminium, copper and
erties were observed to start growing at 700°C. The coat- steel substrates.41 However, the curves shifted towards lar-
ing did not show signs of spallation at 900°C and ger current density values and lower potentials without
maintained its integrity despite oxidation at the particle passivation for inert atmosphere plasma sprayed coating.
boundaries. Potentiodynamic behaviour of the coating This was due to the presence of defects and intercon-
in the NaCl solution also exhibited ameliorated corrosion nected porosity.
performance as compared to the bare substrate. Open cell potential measurements of WC–12Co coat-
This introductory section was aimed at discussing the ing onto carbon steel by high velocity oxygen fuel
ability of cold spray for corrosion protection by exempli- (HVOF)42 and onto Al7075 by cold spray43 in the same
fying the widely used materials such as Al, Ti, Mg and Zn testing conditions in NaCl solution revealed more noble
and also the less used materials such as Stellite and glassy behaviour for the cold sprayed coating. The metal/cer-
powders. For a material based classification of cold spray amic interfaces are the preferable paths for the electrode
coatings, the readers are referred to the available to corrode the coating. The peening effect of the particles
reviews.26,32 What comes in the rest of this paper is a pro- in cold spray tends to less porous structure of the coating
cess based classification of cold spray coatings to mitigate and, hence, fewer paths for the electrode to penetrate in
corrosion that is concluded with possible prospects for the case of cermet deposition. The similar results were
further research and development. The section ‘Cold ver- also obtained in Ref. 44, where cold spraying WC–Co
sus thermal spray: corrosion behaviour’ compares cold onto Al7075 resulted in better performance as compared
and thermal spray coatings in terms of corrosion protec- to HVOF, not only in electrochemical test, but also in
tion. The section ‘Considerations to obtain higher cor- abrasive wear test (rubber wheel) and sliding wear test
rosion resistance by cold spray’ reviews the effect of (ball on disc). Nevertheless, deposition efficiency of
deposition temperature and pressure, particle size, carrier HVOF was found to be higher (∼70%) than cold spray
gas, post-treatment, and co-deposition of metals and cer- deposition.
amic on corrosion behaviour of cold spray coatings. The Ni–20Cr coatings deposited on boiler steel by HVOF,
section ‘Applications and industrial examples’ highlights detonation gas spray and cold spray along with the bare
applications of cold spray to improve corrosion behaviour substrate were subjected to molten salt at 900°C for 50
in different fields. A critical discussion and future path for cycles. The mass change data were recorded as indicator
research and development is given in the last section ‘Path of corrosion rate.45 HVOF, detonation gas and cold
forward’. spray have significantly (61, 88 and 64% respectively)
reduced the mass gain observed for the bare substrate. X- area, and leading to more active sites for corrosion. A
ray diffraction analysis revealed the presence of NiCr2O4 similar trend was also found for corrosion performance
after corrosion test of the detonation gas sprayed sample of Ti coating onto carbon steel where corrosion resistance
and very weak intensity of this phase for HVOF sample. increased by increasing deposition temperature from 350
This mixed oxide phase was found to be absent for the to 500°C, and then decreased at deposition temperature of
cold sprayed specimen. NiCr2O4 exhibits superior cor- 600°C.36
rosion resistance, and its formation was mentioned to be Open circuit potentials of cold sprayed free standing
the reason for better protection offered by detonation titanium in as sprayed and heat treated conditions, in
gas spray. NaCl solution, were more negative as compared to the
Erosion–corrosion tests of HVOF and cold spray bulk titanium. This illustrates more active surface and
coated Ni–20Cr powder on boiler steel were conducted higher thermodynamic tendency to corrosion in the for-
in actual boiler environment as well.46 While the bare mer case.48 Increasing deposition temperature from 600
steel showed an overall weight gain, the HOVF and to 800°C decreased porosity level to almost half and
cold sprayed coating demonstrated an initial weight loss reduced the corrosion current density by an order of mag-
followed by a marginal weight gain. High velocity oxygen nitude. Heat treatment of the two free standing specimens
fuel resulted in lower erosion–corrosion rate and better at 1050°C for 60 min further decreased the corrosion rate
performance as compared to cold spray. This behaviour by one to two orders of magnitude. Heat treatment did so
was attributed to the continuous presence of Cr2O3 in by eliminating smaller pores, surface oxides and produ-
the HVOF coating as opposed to discontinuous streaks cing more homogeneous structure. Open circuit potential
of Cr2O3 in cold spray coating. Chromium has high affi- of titanium coating on carbon steel substrate lied in
nity for oxygen and forms more stable oxide, inhibiting between the corresponding values for bulk titanium and
oxidation of substrate by blocking diffusion of reacting carbon steel, showing solution percolation through the
species. coating. Open circuit potential of the coating deposited
In the light of the reported direct comparisons, and as a at higher temperature was closer to that of bulk titanium
result of the mentioned advantages of cold spray depo- for the first few hundred seconds, and then, the OCP
sition, it can be concluded that cold spray more likely, decreased. However, with the coating deposited at low
but not necessarily, tends to superior corrosion protection. temperature, the OCP value decreased to that of carbon
Nevertheless, thermal spray can lead to better perform- steel within few tens of seconds of immersion. This was
ance when oxides formation is the predominant protective attributed to larger pores distributed through the coating
mechanism. deposited at lower temperature and higher interconnected
porosity.
Open circuit potential measurements in NaCl solutions
Considerations to obtain higher were conducted for low and high pressure cold sprayed
corrosion resistance by cold spray copper coating on Fe52 substrate in as sprayed and heat
treated conditions.49 Fully dense, impermeable coating
In order to draw a general guideline towards improved
structure of high pressure cold spray coating in both as
corrosion resistance understanding the effects of cold
sprayed and heat treated states led to OCP values similar
spray parameters and conditions on corrosion behaviour
to that of bulk Cu. The OCP value of the low pressure
is essential. In this section, cold spray parameters and
conditions are correlated to the resultant corrosion behav- cold spray coating was close to that of substrate, reflecting
the existing of through porosity in this case. Heat treat-
iour in a systematic manner. The effect of deposition
ment was also performed after low pressure cold spray,
temperature and pressure, particle size, coating thickness,
but did not succeed in improving the denseness due to
carrier gas, post-treatment and co-deposition of metals/
the presence of excessive interconnected porosity.
alloys with ceramics/intermetallics are reviewed in details.
Addition of ceramic particle (alumina), on the other
hand, densified the coating structure. Addition of alumina
Deposition temperature and pressure particle in low pressure cold spray followed by post-heat
Increasing deposition temperature of 304 stainless steel treatment resulted in similar OCP behaviour to that of
powders onto interstitial free steel, from 450 to 500 and bulk copper. The coating experienced higher work hard-
550°C, was shown to have a great contribution in enhan- ening in high pressure deposition, hammering effect in
cing bonding between the particles, increasing cohesion co-deposition with ceramic particles and void reduction
strength and decreasing porosity from 6 to 3 and 2%.47 during heat treatment. All these effects have shown to
Potentiodynamic polarisation test in NaCl solution lead to denser and more corrosion resistant copper coat-
showed lower corrosion current density and higher cor- ing. Similar effect of pressure level was found in cold
rosion potential for all the coatings as compared to the spray deposition of titanium powders onto carbon steel.
substrate. Increasing the deposition temperature from Lower deposition pressure led to higher oxygen concen-
450 to 500°C improved the corrosion resistance by chan- tration difference corrosion due to the formation of
ging the rate from 0.47 to 0.02 mm/year. The beneficial more porous structure with less dissolved oxygen concen-
effect reduced for the deposition temperature of 550°C, tration in the pores.36
that resulted in corrosion rate of 0.17 mm/year. The In general, increasing deposition temperature and
weak performance of the 450°C deposited coating was pressure results in higher impact velocity and higher
attributed to the higher porosity leading to sever pitting induced plastic deformation of the powders. These are
of the coating. The decline of the performance from 500 beneficial in terms of obtaining less porous coating, and
to 550°C was attributed to higher degree of plastic defor- thus better corrosion performance. However, corrosion
mation at higher deposition temperature, changing the performance was observed to decline at extremely high
chemical potential of the metal atoms in the deformed deposition temperatures. This is attributed to
predominant softening of the powders at extremely high μm, demonstrating a critical thickness of the coating
temperature and induced localised deformation in such required to avoid the formation of interconnected poros-
cases acting as the preferential sites for corrosion. ity from the coating surface to the substrate via localised
attack.
Three types of 316L stainless steel powders of different
Particle size and coating thickness granulometry (fine, − 18+5; medium, − 28+7; and
Two sets of standard and improved tantalum powders coarse, − 36+15) were cold sprayed onto aluminium sub-
were deposited on carbon steel.50 Improved powders con- strate.52 No significant effect of the powder size on the
sisted of finer powders with narrower size distribution and coating adhesion and microhardness was observed,
less oxygen content, and were deposited at higher temp- whereas the porosity level increased by increasing the par-
erature. Open cell potential of the coating with improved ticle size. The anodic polarisation behaviour in NaCl sol-
conditions approached to that of bulk tantalum, while ution resulted in least noble potential and highest
standard coating behaved similar to the substrate. The corrosion current density for the coarse powders. Decreas-
reason was that existing through porosity in standard ing particle size led to slight decrease in the corrosion cur-
coating allowed the test solution to penetrate into the rent density. However, the polarisation curve of the
coating/substrate interface. Such behaviour was also the coating deposited with the finest powders was still far
reason to provide instability of passivation layer in stan- from the curve of the bulk stainless steel. Application of
dard coating, and poor corrosion protection in NaCl surface laser post treatment was shown to shift the polar-
and H2SO4 at room temperature as compared to bulk tan- isation behaviour towards bulk stainless steel. Laser post-
talum and improved high quality coating. The high qual- treatment was able to do so by eliminating interparticle
ity coating, on the other hand, showed similar discontinuity borders, and decreasing the porosity, lead-
polarisation behaviour to the bulk material. It got passi- ing to significant improvement of corrosion.
vated rapidly with stable passive layer testified to a very In summary, using big powder particles in cold spray
low corrosion rate in the passive area at both room and deposition leads to poor corrosion resistance. Finer pow-
elevated temperature (80°C). ders tend to result in a more compact coating and improve
Figure 4 shows anodic polarisation behaviour of cold the corrosion properties. Increasing coating thickness also
sprayed 316L stainless steel coatings of the same thick- appears to be beneficial in terms of corrosion perform-
ness, but with different powder particle sizes, on AZ91 ance. It seems that a lower band thickness exists for the
as well as the bulk material.51 The largest set of the par- coating to ensure protection of the substrate by preventing
ticles resulted in the least noble potential and the highest corrosion attack via interconnected porosity.
corrosion current density. The corrosion rate decreases by
reducing the powder size due to less porous structure of
the coating with smaller particles. Nevertheless, a mixture Carrier gas
of large and small particles ( − 22 and − 10 μm) exhibited Two different carrier gases, i.e. helium and a mixture of
the closest corrosion performance to that of the bulk helium and nitrogen, were used to deposit 1100 alu-
material. The improved quality of interparticle bonding minium onto the same substrate.53 Comparing electroche-
in this case played an important role to reduce the effect mical behaviour of the coating with the substrate in
of localised corrosive attacks. In the same study, coatings H2SO4 demonstrated faster protective layer formation in
with different thicknesses obtained by the same particle the coating as a result of porosity and residual stress.
size also showed different polarisation behaviours. The The corrosion resistance of the coating deposited with
curves followed a trend from behaviour dominated by helium was less than the one deposited with the mixed
the substrate (AZ91) towards the behaviour of the bulk carrier gas. Higher specific heat ratio and lower mass den-
stainless steel as the coating thickness increased from 40 sity of helium lead to higher induced plastic deformation
to 305 μm. A transition from non-passivating to passivat- in the particles and highly stressed regions in the coating.
ing behaviour was also observed at the thickness of 105 Accordingly, more preferential sites were present to
4 a anodic polarisation behaviour of 316SS cold spray coatings using different powder particles sizes and b anodic polarisation
behaviour of 316SS cold spray coatings of different thicknesses, compared to bulk type 316SS and AZ91E tb6 substrate
material; coatings were sprayed using − 22 μm powder51
undergo rapid corrosion kinetics, eventually leading to Codeposition of metals/alloys with ceramics/
localised extensive pitting and oxide layer cracking after intermetallic
corrosion test. Different volume fraction (0, 15, 30 and 60%) of silicon
The surface reactivity of the powders with oxygen carbide particles were mechanically blended with Al
might also vary with different carrier gases. For instance, 5056 powders and cold sprayed on aluminium substrate.57
using air increased the reactivity and thus doubled the Porosity of the Al 5056 coating decreased from 2.25%
porosity of the titanium coating deposited with com- to < 1% for all the composite coatings. It was found
pressed air as compared to the one deposited with that pores always appeared in the interparticle boundaries
nitrogen.36 between ceramic and metallic powders or within the clus-
It should be mentioned that helium is known to pro- ter of the ceramic particles due to poor deformability of
duce high quality coating with satisfactory mechanical SiC particles. Compared to the bulk aluminium, the
properties. The reason that using helium was not as effec- OCP values of all coatings shifted to cathodic values in
tive as the mixture of helium and nitrogen in the reviewed Na2SO4 solution. SiC content did not have any effect on
example could be attributed to ‘high end’ condition of the stabilised potential value due to its inert properties.
spraying experienced in this specific case, leading to loca-
Volume fraction of SiC particles also showed no signifi-
lised plastic deformation. Using helium in cold spray cant effect on the anodic polarisation behaviour of the
deposition as compared to nitrogen can potentially lead composite coatings. A crevice-like phenomenon due to
to better corrosion performance if the processing par- coating roughness, was found to be responsible for the
ameters are optimised such that localised severe defor- corrosion initiation. Propagation was promoted by acidi-
mation is avoided.
fication of localised corrosion in the particle boundaries.
The dissolution network finally ensures the particle
removal that can be considered as uniform degradation
of the coating.
Post-treatment Successful isolation of the magnesium alloy substrate
Cold sprayed stainless steel (316L) on mild steel substrate (AZ91) in NaCl solution was reported by cold spray
could provide higher corrosion resistance as compared to deposition of aluminium powders in pure state, alloyed
the bare substrate. However, the corrosion potential of (6061) and co-deposited with alumina particles.30,58 Cor-
stainless steel coating was lower than its bulk material. rosion current densities of the pure and composite coating
Heat treatment of the coated specimens at 400, 800 and were three orders lower than that of the bare substrate,
1100°C succeeded in increasing the corrosion potential indicating much higher anti-corrosion ability.58 No pas-
and shifting it towards the corrosion potential of the sive effect on anti-corrosion ability of the composite coat-
bulk material.54 This is due to the improvement in the ing was found as compared to that of pure Al coating.
quality of bonding especially in weakly bonded intersplat However, more reliable long term protection of the sub-
boundaries that were present in as sprayed condition. strate was speculated for the aluminium co-deposited
Laser post-treating of cold sprayed titanium was shown with alumina, due to less coating porosity.58 Figure 6
to be a successful technique to densify the coating by compares the cross-section of cold sprayed Al coating
melting top surface layer and releasing the porosities to onto AZ91D with that of Al–25 vol.-%Al2O3.59 The Al
the free surface with the subsequent solidification.55 Elec- coating shows a porous structure, whereas the co-depo-
trochemical tests in NaCl solution were conducted on
sition with ceramic particles significantly reduced the
titanium coating on carbon steel substrate in as sprayed coating porosity.
and laser post-treated conditions. The carbon steel sub- Addition of alumina particles to Ni–Cu powders has
strate was corroded, being less noble, and corrosion pit
been shown to have a two-side benefit to achieve higher
formed. The laser post-treatment, on the other hand, corrosion resistance.56 First, it improved the denseness
resulted in a shift of OCP and corrosion potential values of the coating by the hammering effect of ceramic par-
close to the level attained by bulk titanium (see Fig. 5) and ticles. Second, addition of hard alumina particle in the
a decrease in corrosion current by two orders of magni- metallic based powder enabled achieving higher depo-
tude compared to as sprayed condition. For a detailed dis- sition gas temperature (without nozzle clogging), and
cussion on the application of laser post-treatment after thus enhanced density and improved quality of the
cold spray, readers are referred to the review paper written coating.
in the field.29 Co-depositing alumina particles with Ni–20Cr on car-
There are also cases where heat treatment of the cold bon steel resulted in less through porosity in the coating
spray coating leads to slightly less noble behaviour as as shown by the salt spray test.60 The through porosity
compared to as sprayed coating. For instance, cold of the coating decreased with increasing alumina particles
sprayed nickel on carbon steel showed such behaviour size and fraction. Hard alumina particles also induced
in NaCl, NaOH and KOH solutions due to slight oxi- higher plastic deformation onto Al powders, making
dation of the coating during heat treatment.56 them packed and dense.30 Corrosion examination showed
In summary, post-heat or laser treatment improves that neither the alumina content nor the post-spray heat
bonding quality and diminish interparticle boundaries,
treatment had any significant effect on polarisation behav-
which are preferential sites for corrosion. Therefore, it is iour of the coating.30 Post-spray heat treatment, neverthe-
a recommended process as far as corrosion performance less, increased stability against formation of metastable
of cold spray coating is regarded. However, one should pits by increasing electrical conductivity, reducing inter-
mind oxidation of the coating during post-heat treatment. face contact resistance and reducing dislocation density.
Post-heat treatment did not show significant improvement Al 7075 particles mixed with B4C and SiC reinforce-
in case of co-deposited coatings, which will be discussed in ments were deposited onto 6061-T6 alloy using cold
the next section.
5 Open circuit potential in aerated 3.5%NaCl of bulk Ti, carbon steel, as sprayed Ti coating (on carbon steel) and laser treated Ti
coating55
spray.61 Open circuit potential of the bare substrate in WC–Co cermet powders were shown to successfully
NaCl solution tended to increase first as a result of surface provide corrosion protection for Al 7075 and carbon
passivation, by the formation of more protective oxide. It steel substrates.43,63 It should be mentioned that cold
then decreased, indicating that the substrate reached the spraying of WC–Co cermet is not co-deposition of metals
pitting potential, and simultaneously localised corrosion and ceramics but deposition of metal–ceramic composite
occurred. Al coatings (Al 7075, Al 7075+20 vol.-%B4C powders. A certain degree of ductility of the particles is
and Al 7075+20 vol.-%SiC), on the other hand, showed required for the successful deposition and coating build-
stable and lower potential, suggesting that stable oxide up in cold spray, justifying addition of ductile binder to
film have already formed before exposure or within a the ceramic. Open cell potential curves of WC–12Co,
few seconds of exposure. Unreinforced Al 7075 coating WC–17Co and WC–25Co coating on Al 7075 in NaCl
exhibited much more noble corrosion potential and solution initially decreased due to dissolution of oxides
lower corrosion current density as compared to the cer- and penetration of electrolyte; and then stabilised. Com-
amic reinforced coatings. Higher level of plastic defor- paring the potential values of the coatings and substrate
mation experienced in the composite coating was showed that the electrolyte did not reach the substrate
mentioned to lead to more active sites of corrosion. in any of coatings. As the fraction of ductile binder
Different powders, i.e. aluminium, aluminium–alumina increases, the coating shows less noble behaviour. By
and aluminium–alumina–zinc, were deposited onto increasing fraction of ductile binder, the metal/ceramic
Al2024 and were exposed to salt spray test corrosion interfaces increase. Therefore, more preferable paths are
test.62 Corrosion of aluminium–alumina coating intensi- provided for the electrode to corrode, leading to the less
fied as ceramic particle concentration increased in the noble electrochemical behaviour.
coating. The best performance was obtained for pure alu- Aluminium blended with 50 and 70 vol.-%Mg17Al12,
minium coating. The process of degradation was acceler- and cold sprayed on AZ91, was shown to successfully
ated for aluminium–alumina–zinc by the aluminium–zinc decrease the corrosion current density in NaCl solution,
galvanic couple, suggesting it as a suitable sacrificial as compared to the bare substrate. In fact, the corrosion
anode material. current density and corrosion potentials of both
performance of the coating is required in both aspects. It corrosion products can accelerate pit formation and
was shown in this review that increasing deposition temp- growth through the surface. Excluding this inherent dis-
erature and pressure, finer powder particles, thicker coat- advantage of coating could lead to more illustrative com-
ings, post-heat or laser treatment and co-deposition of parison of corrosion behaviour of cold spray coating and
metals/alloys with ceramic/intermetallics are all capable bulk material of the same type. A thin layer could be
of potentially improving corrosion behaviour. removed from the coating surface to exclude the draw-
The dominant point of view in corrosion protection by backs of high surface roughness in corrosion studies. Per-
cold spray is to apply this technique to provide protective forming post-treatments such as grinding, machining or
layer for an unfinished component. However, one pro- electropolishing on the cold spray coatings and studying
spect of cold spray could be repairing the corroded the effects on corrosion performance are worth examin-
parts of the components that are already in service. Cor- ing. This can improve the corrosion behaviour of the coat-
rosion-related maintenance and failures cost the aircraft ing to approach to that of the bulk material, and more
industry billions of dollars annually. Therefore, on pro- importantly, this can reveal how corrosion mechanisms
spect of cold spray could be in situ repairing the aeronau- might change from bulk material to the coating when
tical components made of Al or Ti alloys, given the the roughness effect does not intervene.
successful performance of such coatings against corrosion Cold spraying of titanium offers an attractive avenue
reviewed in this work. Because cold spray process is highly for designing against aqueous corrosion as well as biome-
collimated, it is potentially suitable for localised corrosion dical applications. Nevertheless, some level of difficulty
protection and restoration, without the need for excessive has been often reported in cold spraying of titanium
masking. It can also eliminate the need to pre-surface and its alloys. High levels of Porosity as well as intercon-
treatments such as sand blasting, as it can bring the peen- nected pores significantly deteriorate corrosion perform-
ing effect of the particles itself. Adding the capability of in ance of titanium coatings. A comprehensive
situ repair to cold spraying would significantly increase its optimisation of deposition parameters is, therefore,
coverage in the field of corrosion protection. To achieve needed to exploit the full advantage of titanium as cold
this goal, portability of cold spray unit is a central chal- spray coating. As a rule of thumb, ‘high end parameters’
lenge to be overcome. Although the technology of design- should be set in cold spraying of titanium particles to
ing portable cold spray systems is currently available in obtain compact coatings. Preheating of the powders and
the limited industries, the widespread application of the substrate, high temperature deposition, 1000°C for
such units depends on the ability of making competitive instance, impact velocities far higher than the critical vel-
deposition with stationary counterparts, in particular, ocity (1100 m s − 1 for instance) and as much less deviation
for high pressure deposition regime. Therefore, design from perpendicular impact as possible are some key sug-
considerations of the basic elements in cold spray such gestions towards successful deposition of titanium par-
as supersonic nozzle, pressure vessel and heater should ticles. Nevertheless, some limitations of available devices
be carefully revisited and optimised. should be addressed first in this regard.
Cold spray coating, whether or not able to protect the A primary application of thermal spray coatings for
substrate, was not found to be able to retain the corrosion over half a century has been the galvanic protection of
properties of the bulk material of its type. It is known that steel structures. In the majority of cold spray deposition
cold spray significantly increases the surface roughness. onto steel substrates, reviewed here, the objective was
Rough surfaces decrease the corrosion resistance, because not to provide sacrificial protection but to provide less
of high ion release rate, plastic deformation under loading active layer to the environment. Zinc and aluminium
and promoting the risk of pit formation. Presence of sur- can provide sacrificial protection for steel. Zinc is a low
face defects entrapping corrosion causing species and melting temperature metal with low critical velocity
(∼350 m s − 1); and thus an easy material to be cold 12. Fukanuma H., Ohno N., Sun B. and Huang R.: ‘In-flight particle
sprayed. In general, it is known that incorporation of alu- velocity measurements with DPV-2000 in cold spray’, Surf. Coat.
Technol., 2006, 201, 1935–1941.
minium to the sacrificial zinc coating can extend the cor- 13. Stoltenhoff T., Kreye H. and Richter H. J.: ‘An analysis of the cold
rosion protection of steel. However, higher impact spray process and its coatings’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2002, 11,
velocities (600–700 m s − 1) is needed for cold spray depo- 542–550.
sition of aluminium. Co-deposition of aluminium and 14. Li W. Y., Yu M., Wang F. F., Yin S. and Liao H. L.: ‘A generalized
critical velocity window based on material property for cold spray-
zinc onto steel might be a compromise to obtain a good ing by Eulerian method’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2013, 23, 557–
sacrificial protection by cold spray deposition. Volume 566.
fraction of the powders, the powder morphology and 15. Li W. -Y., Li C. -J. and Liao H.: ‘Significant influence of particle sur-
deposition temperature effect could be the subject of face oxidation on deposition efficiency, interface microstructure and
further study in providing sacrificial protection to steel adhesive strength of cold-sprayed copper coatings’, Appl. Surf. Sci.,
2010, 256, 4953–4958.
by co-deposition of zinc and aluminium. 16. Schmidt T., Gaertner F. and Kreye H.: ‘New Developments in cold
A very important characteristic to interpret the per- spray based on higher gas and particle temperatures’, J. Therm.
formance of cold spray coatings against corrosion is the Spray Technol., 2006, 15, 488–494.
level of porosity. It is often measured by analysing optical 17. Yin S., Wang X., Li W., Liao H. and Jie H.: ‘Deformation behavior
of the oxide film on the surface of cold sprayed powder particle’,
micrographs taken from the coating/substrate cross-sec- Appl. Surf. Sci., 2012, 259, 294–300.
tion. It was argued in the literature that, as etching attacks 18. Li W. Y., Liao H., Li C. J., Bang H. S. and Coddet C.: ‘Numerical
the particle boundaries, a prolonged etching might result simulation of deformation behavior of Al particles impacting on
in losing particles from deposit. Therefore, the measured Al substrate and effect of surface oxide films on interfacial bonding
porosity will depend on etching duration. Moreover, in cold spraying’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2007, 253, 5084–5091.
19. Zhang D., Shipway P. H. and McCartney D. G.: ‘Cold gas dynamic
such micrographs are not able to reveal very fine pores spraying of aluminum: the role of substrate characteristics in deposit
(submicrometre pores) that may exist in the coating. Opti- formation’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2005, 14, 109–116.
cal microscopy thus seems not reliable and definitive way 22. Richer P., Jodoin B., Ajdelsztajn L. and Lavernia E. J.: ‘Substrate
of determining overall porosity in the coating, and its roughness and thickness effects on cold spray nanocrystalline Al–
Mg coatings’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2006, 15, 246–254.
result should be interpreted with enough caution. Along 21. Wright T. W.: ‘Shear band susceptibility: work hardening materials’,
with optical microscopy, using other methods such as Int. J. Plast., 1992, 8, 583–602.
conductivity or heat transfer measurements, that could 22. Wu J., Fang H., Yoon S., Kim H. and Lee C.: ‘The rebound
be sensitive to pores and interparticle bonding quality is phenomenon in kinetic spraying deposition’, Scr. Mater., 2006, 54,
also worth exploring. These methods can provide an 665–669.
23. Assadi H., Schmidt T., Richter H., Kliemann J. -O., Binder K.,
easy and yet reliable tool to assess the coating perform- Gärtner F., Klassen T. and Kreye H.: ‘On parameter selection in
ance and optimize processing parameters before going cold spraying’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2011, 20, 1161–1176.
to the final time consuming corrosion tests. 24. Rech S., Trentin A., Vezzù S., Legoux J. G., Irissou E. and
Guagliano M.: ‘Influence of pre-heated Al 6061 substrate tempera-
ture on the residual stresses of multipass Al coatings deposited by
cold spray’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2010, 20, 243–251.
25. Moridi A., Gangaraj S. M. H., Vezzu S. and Guagliano M.:
‘Number of passes and thickness effect on mechanical character-
References istics of cold spray coating’, Procedia Eng., 2014, 74, 449–459.
1. Dykhuizen R. C., Smith M. F., Gilmore D. L., Neiser R. A., Jiang 26. Moridi A., Hassani-Gangaraj S. M., Guagliano M. and Dao M.:
X. and Sampath S.: ‘Impact of high velocity cold spray particles’, J. ‘Cold spray coating: review of material systems and future perspec-
Therm. Spray Technol., 1999, 8, 559–564. tives’, Surf. Eng., 2014, 30, 369–395.
2. Assadi H., Gärtner F., Stoltenhoff T. and Kreye H.: ‘Bonding mech- 27. Moridi A., Hassani-Gangaraj S. M., Guagliano M., Vezzu S.,
anism in cold gas spraying’, Acta Mater., 2003, 51, 4379–4394. Fracture and fatigue, Vol. 7. Proc. Conf. of the Society for
3. Schmidt T., Gärtner F., Assadi H. and Kreye H.: ‘Development of a Experimental Mechanics Series, edited by Jay Carroll, 51–57;
generalized parameter window for cold spray deposition’, Acta 2014, Springer International Publishing, New York.
Mater., 2006, 54, 729–742. 28. Moridi A., Hassani-Gangaraj S. M. and Guagliano M.: ‘On fatigue
4. Grujicic M., Saylor J. R., Beasley D. E., DeRosset W. S. and behavior of cold spray coating’, Symposium JJ – Materials funda-
Helfritch D.: ‘Computational analysis of the interfacial bonding mentals of fatigue and fracture MRS Proc. 1650, 2014.
between feed-powder particles and the substrate in the cold-gas 29. Olakanmi E. O. and Doyoyo M.: ‘Laser-assisted cold-sprayed cor-
dynamic-spray process’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2003, 219, 211–227. rosion- and wear-resistant coatings: a review’, J. Therm. Spray
5. Grujicic M., Zhao C., DeRosset W. and Helfritch D.: ‘Adiabatic Technol., 2014, 23, 765–785.
shear instability based mechanism for particles/substrate bonding 30. Spencer K., Fabijanic D. M. and Zhang M. -X.: ‘The use of Al–
in the cold-gas dynamic-spray process’, Mater. Des., 2004, 25, Al2O3 cold spray coatings to improve the surface properties of mag-
681–688. nesium alloys’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2009, 204, 336–344.
6. Moridi A., Hassani-Gangaraj S. M. and Guagliano M.: ‘A hybrid 31. Bala N., Singh H., Karthikeyan J. and Prakash S.: ‘Cold spray coat-
approach to determine critical and erosion velocities in the cold ing process for corrosion protection: a review’, Surf. Eng., 2014, 30,
spray process’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013, 273, 617–624. 414–421.
7. Bae G., Kumar S., Yoon S., Kang K., Na H., Kim H. J. and Lee C.: 32. Koivuluoto H. and Vuoristo P.: ‘Structure and corrosion properties
‘Bonding features and associated mechanisms in kinetic sprayed of cold sprayed coatings: a review’, Surf. Eng., 2014, 30, 404–413.
titanium coatings’, Acta Mater., 2009, 57, 5654–5666. 33. Champagne V. K.: ‘The cold spray materials deposition process:
8. Bae G., Xiong Y., Kumar S., Kang K. and Lee C.: ‘General aspects fundamentals and applications Cambridge’; Woodhead. http://
of interface bonding in kinetic sprayed coatings’, Acta Mater., 2008, books.google.it/books?id = 5TPWGAAACAAJ 2007.
56, 4858–4868. 34. Tao Y., Xiong T., Sun C., Kong L., Cui X., Li T. and Song G. -L.:
9. Schmidt T., Assadi H., Gärtner F., Richter H., Stoltenhoff T., Kreye ‘Microstructure and corrosion performance of a cold sprayed alu-
H. and Klassen T.: ‘From particle acceleration to impact and bond- minium coating on AZ91D magnesium alloy’, Corros. Sci., 2010,
ing in cold spraying’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2009, 18, 794–808. 52, 3191–3197.
10. King P. C., Bae G., Zahiri S. H., Jahedi M. and Lee C.: ‘An exper- 35. DeForce B. S., Eden T. J. and Potter J. K.: ‘Cold spray Al–5% Mg
imental and finite element study of cold spray copper impact onto coatings for the corrosion protection of magnesium alloys’, J.
two aluminum substrates’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2009, 19, Therm. Spray Technol., 2011, 20, 1352–1358.
620–634. 36. Wang H. -R., Hou B. -R., Wang J., Wang Q. and Li W. -Y.: ‘Effect of
11. Raletz F., Vardelle M. and Ezo'o G.: ‘Critical particle velocity under process conditions on microstructure and corrosion resistance of cold-
cold spray conditions’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, 201, 1942–1947. sprayed Ti coatings’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2008, 17, 736–741.
37. Wang H. -R., Li W. -Y., Ma L., Wang J. and Wang Q.: ‘Corrosion 56. Koivuluoto H., Milanti A., Bolelli G., Lusvarghi L. and Vuoristo P.:
behavior of cold sprayed titanium protective coating on 1Cr13 sub- ‘High-pressure cold-sprayed Ni and Ni–Cu coatings: improved
strate in seawater’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2007, 201, 5203–5206. structures and corrosion properties’, J. Therm. Spray Technol.,
38. Chavan N. M., Kiran B., Jyothirmayi A., Phani P. S. and 2013, 23, 98–103.
Sundararajan G.: ‘The corrosion behavior of cold sprayed zinc coat- 57. Wang Y., Normand B., Mary N., Yu M. and Liao H.:
ings on mild steel substrate’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2013, 22, ‘Microstructure and corrosion behavior of cold sprayed SiCp/Al
463–470. 5056 composite coatings’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2014, 251, 264–275.
39. Lahiri D., Gill P. K., Scudino S., Zhang C., Singh V., Karthikeyan J., 58. Tao Y., Xiong T., Sun C., Jin H., Du H. and Li T.: ‘Effect of α-
Munroe N., Seal S. and Agarwal A.: ‘Cold sprayed aluminum based Al2O3 on the properties of cold sprayed Al/α-Al2O3 composite
glassy coating: synthesis, wear and corrosion properties’, Surf. Coat. coatings on AZ91D magnesium alloy’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2009, 256,
Technol., 2013, 232, 33–40. 261–266.
40. Cinca N. and Guilemany J. M.: ‘Structural and properties character- 59. Wang Q., Spencer K., Birbilis N. and Zhang M. -X.: ‘The influence of
ization of stellite coatings obtained by cold gas spraying’, Surf. Coat. ceramic particles on bond strength of cold spray composite coatings
Technol., 2013, 220, 90–97. on AZ91 alloy substrate’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 205, 50–56.
41. Koivuluoto H., Bolelli G., Lusvarghi L., Casadei F. and Vuoristo P.: 60. Koivuluoto H. and Vuoristo P.: ‘Effect of ceramic particles on prop-
‘Corrosion resistance of cold-sprayed Ta coatings in very aggressive erties of cold-sprayed Ni-20Cr+Al2O3 coatings’, J. Therm. Spray
conditions’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 205, 1103–1107. Technol., 2009, 18, 555–562.
42. Guilemany J. M., Dosta S. and Miguel J. R.: ‘The enhancement of 61. Meydanoglu O., Jodoin B. and Kayali E. S.: ‘Microstructure, mech-
the properties of WC–Co HVOF coatings through the use of nanos- anical properties and corrosion performance of 7075 Al matrix cer-
tructured and microstructured feedstock powders’, Surf. Coat. amic particle reinforced composite coatings produced by the cold
Technol., 2006, 201, 1180–1190. gas dynamic spraying process’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013, 235,
43. Couto M., Dosta S., Torrell M., Fernández J. and Guilemany J. M.: 108–116.
‘Cold spray deposition of WC–17 and 12Co cermets onto alumi- 62. Dzhurinskiy D., Maeva E., Leshchinsky E. and Maev R. G.:
num’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013, 235, 54–61. ‘Corrosion protection of light alloys using low pressure cold
44. Couto M., Dosta S. and Guilemany J. M.: ‘Comparison of the spray’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2012, 21, 304–313.
mechanical and electrochemical properties of WC-17 and 12Co 63. Dosta S., Couto M. and Guilemany J. M.: ‘Cold spray deposition of
coatings onto Al7075-T6 obtained by high velocity oxy-fuel and a WC–25Co cermet onto Al7075-T6 and carbon steel substrates’,
cold gas spraying’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2015, 268, 180–189. Acta Mater., 2013, 61, 643–652.
45. Kaushal G., Bala N., Kaur N., Singh H. and Prakash S.: 64. Bu H., Yandouzi M., Lu C., MacDonald D. and Jodoin B.: ‘Cold
‘Comparative high-temperature corrosion behavior of Ni–20Cr spray blended Al+Mg17Al12 coating for corrosion protection of
coatings on tb22 boiler steel produced by HVOF, D-Gun, and AZ91D magnesium alloy’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, 207, 155–162.
cold spraying’, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2013, 45A, 395–410. 65. Champagne V. K. and Helfritch D. J.: ‘Mainstreaming cold spray –
46. Bala N., Singh H., Prakash S. and Karthikeyan J.: ‘Investigations on push for applications’, Surf. Eng., 2014, 30, 396–403.
the behavior of HVOF and cold sprayed Ni–20Cr coating on tb22 66. Zhou X. and Mohanty P.: ‘Electrochemical behavior of cold sprayed
boiler steel in actual boiler environment’, J. Therm. Spray hydroxyapatite/titanium composite in Hanks' solution’,
Technol., 2011, 21, 144–158. Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 65, 134–140.
47. Meng X., Zhang J., Zhao J., Liang Y. and Zhang Y.: ‘Influence of 67. AL-Mangour B., Mongrain R., Irissou E. and Yue S.: ‘Improving
gas temperature on microstructure and properties of cold spray the strength and corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel for bio-
304SS coating’, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2011, 27, 809–815. medical applications using cold spray’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013,
48. Hussain T., McCartney D. G., Shipway P. H. and Marrocco T.: 216, 297–307.
‘Corrosion behavior of cold sprayed titanium coatings and free 68. Noorakma A. C. W., Zuhailawati H., Aishvarya V. and Dhindaw B.
standing deposits’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2010, 20, 260–274. K.: ‘Hydroxyapatite-coated magnesium-based biodegradable alloy:
49. Koivuluoto H., Coleman A., Murray K., Kearns M. and Vuoristo cold spray deposition and simulated body fluid studies’, J. Mater.
P.: ‘High pressure cold sprayed (HPCS) and low pressure cold Eng. Perform., 2013, 22, 2997–3004.
sprayed (LPCS) coatings prepared from OFHC Cu feedstock: over- 69. Bala N., Singh H. and Prakash S.: ‘High temperature corrosion
view from powder characteristics to coating properties’, J. Therm. behavior of cold spray Ni–20Cr coating on boiler steel in molten
Spray Technol., 2012, 21, 1065–1075. salt environment at 900°C’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2009, 19,
50. Koivuluoto H., Näkki J. and Vuoristo P.: ‘Corrosion properties of 110–118.
cold-sprayed tantalum coatings’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2008, 70. Bala N., Singh H. and Prakash S.: ‘Accelerated hot corrosion studies
18, 75–82. of cold spray Ni–50Cr coating on boiler steels’, Mater. Des., 2010,
51. Spencer K. and Zhang M. -X.: ‘Optimisation of stainless steel cold 31, 244–253.
spray coatings using mixed particle size distributions’, Surf. Coat. 71. Bala N., Singh H., Karthikeyan J. and Prakash S.: ‘Performance of
Technol., 2011, 205, 5135–5140. cold sprayed Ni–20Cr and Ni–50Cr coatings on SA 516 steel in
52. Sova A., Grigoriev S., Okunkova A. and Smurov I.: ‘Cold spray actual industrial environment of a coal fired boiler’, Mater.
deposition of 316L stainless steel coatings on aluminium surface Corros., 2013, 64, 783–793.
with following laser post-treatment’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013, 72. Kalsi S. S., Sidhu T. S., Singh H. and Karthikeyan J.: ‘Analysis of
235, 283–289. material degradation for uncoated and NiCoCrAlY cold spray
53. Balani K., Laha T., Agarwal A., Karthikeyan J. and Munroe N.: coated Superfer 800H in the secondary chamber of medical waste
‘Effect of carrier gases on microstructural and electrochemical incinerator’, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2014, 46, 238–246.
behavior of cold-sprayed 1100 aluminum coating’, Surf. Coat. 73. Kalsi S. S., Sidhu T. S. and Singh H.: ‘Performance of cold spray
Technol., 2005, 195, 272–279. coatings on Fe-based superalloy in Na2SO4–NaCl environment at
54. Sundararajan G., Sudharshan Phani P., Jyothirmayi A. and 900°C’, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2014, 240, 456–463.
Gundakaram R. C.: ‘The influence of heat treatment on the micro- 74. Ma C., Liu X. and Zhou C.: ‘Cold-sprayed Al coating for corrosion
structural, mechanical and corrosion behaviour of cold sprayed SS protection of sintered NdFeB’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2013, 23,
316L coatings’, J. Mater. Sci., 2009, 44, 2320–2326. 456–462.
55. Marrocco T., Hussain T., McCartney D. G. and Shipway P. H.: 75. Krebs S., Gärtner F. and Klassen T.: ‘Cold spraying of Cu–Al–
‘Corrosion performance of laser posttreated cold sprayed titanium bronze for cavitation protection in marine environments’, J.
coatings’, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2011, 20, 909–917. Therm. Spray Technol., 2014, 45, 708–716.