Week 10 Rock Slope Stability Analysis
Week 10 Rock Slope Stability Analysis
Planes and lines with shallow dips have great circles and points that
plot near the circumference of the stereonet, and those with steep
dips plot near the center. In contrast, the pole of a shallow dipping
plane plots close to the center of the circle, and the pole of a steep
plane plots close to the perimeter.
(a) the first of these planes has already been drawn in figure on
previous page. The great circle defining the second plane is
obtained by marking the 2500 dip direction on the circumference
of the net, rotating the tracing until the mark lies on the W–E axis
and tracing the great circle corresponding to a dip of 30◦
(b) the tracing is rotated until the intersection of the two great circles
lies along the W–E axis of the stereonet, and the plunge of the
line of intersection is measured as 20.5◦;
(c) the tracing is now rotated until the north mark coincides the north
Determination of orientation (plunge and trend)
point on the stereonet and the trend of the line of intersection is
of line intersection between two planes with
found to be 200.5◦.
orientations 50/130 and 30/250 on an equal
area (Lambert or Schmidt) net (Wyllie and Mah,
2005).
Plane (block) failure is Examination of the existence of that conditions on stereonet is called
possible on the discontinuity as kinematic analysis. If the above requirements are supplied that
plane because the dip means plane (block) failure is kinematically feasible. Yet, this is a
vector of the discontinuity probability analysis and does not provide certain information
plane lies within the shaded whether the block will slide or not. In order to draw a certain
area which means the dip of
conclusion on failure, the factor of safety must be calculated.
the discontinuity plane is
flatter than the dip of face,
but steeper than the friction
angle of the discontinuity
plane, that is ψf > ψp >