extrinsic

Respondent Group Math Science motivation

4 2 77 77 2.34
6 2 78 78 2.34
8 2 77 77 2.13
9 2 87 88 3.54
11 2 66 88 2.43
13 2 77 77 2.45
16 2 76 77 2.21
17 2 56 88 2.13
19 2 65 88 2.34
20 2 77 77 1.65
24 2 77 77 2.12
26 2 66 88 2.98
27 2 77 77 2.96
29 2 77 78 2.11
30 2 66 76 2.22
32 2 77 87 2.34
34 2 89 88 2.12
37 2 78 78 2.15
39 2 88 77 3.12
40 2 76 86 2.12
43 2 67 77 2.4
46 2 66 88 3.21
50 2 87 76 3.21
56 2 67 78 2.34
59 2 78 77 3.11
71 2 78 78 3.86
76 2 67 77 2.54
82 2 87 78 3.21
87 2 89 88 2
93 2 84 86 2
Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 (new method) Group 2 (traditional)
88 77 Mean 78.7857142857143 75.9
86 78 Variance 70.7795031055901 72.3
88 77 count 70 30
77 87 df 69 29
76 66 F-statistic 1.02148216401211
77 77 p-value 0.456063008711535 alpha=0.05
76 76 decision do not reject the null hypothesis. This means that the groups are equal int
66 56 interpretation not significant
56 65 pooled variance estimator 71.2294460641399
77 77 standard deviation 8.41305551542304 8.5029406678
76 77 df 98
55 66 Hypothesize mean 0
67 77 t-statistic 1.56687082219002
76 77 p-value 0.12036833040165 alpha=0.05
88 66 decision do not reject the null hypothesis. This means that the groups are equal int
77 77 interpretation not significant
78 89
88 78
67 88
87 76
66 67
66 66
77 87
77 67
78 78
78 78
89 67
87 87
66 89
77 84
66
67
78
76
88
87
89
87
88
77
87
77
67
76
77
87
77
87
77
78
77
87
88
89
87
88
78
77
87
66
76
78
73
86
81
90
90
87
76
74
means that the groups are equal interms of variances

means that the groups are equal interms of sample means in math scores
Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2
88 77 Mean 78.785714286 75.9
86 78 Variance 70.779503106 72.3
88 77 count 70 30
77 87 df 69 29
76 66 F-statistic 1.021482164
77 77 p-value 0.4560630087
decision
null hypothesis should not to be rejected,
this means that the variances of the
76 76 population are equal
66 56 interpretation not significant
56 65
77 77 pooled variance estimator 71.229446064
76 77 standard deviation 8.4130555154 8.5029406678
55 66 df 98
67 77 Hypothesize mean 0
76 77 t-statistic 1.5668708222
88 66 p-value 0.1203683304
decision
null hypothesis should not to be rejected,
this implies that the means of g1 and g2
are the same
77 77
78 89 interpretation not significant
88 78
67 88
87 76
66 67
66 66
77 87
77 67
78 78
78 78
89 67
87 87
66 89
77 84
66
67
78
76
88
87
89
87
88
77
87
77
67
76
77
87
77
87
77
78
77
87
88
89
87
88
78
77
87
66
76
78
73
86
81
90
90
87
76
74
Table 1. Comparison of the variances and the means of the two groups.
Group Variance Mean F-stat p-value
Group 1 (n=70) 70.78 78.79
1.02 0.456
Group 2 (n=30) 72.30 75.90

Table 2. Comparison of the means and standard deviation of the two groups.
Group Mean Standard deviation t-stat p-value

Group 1 (n=70) 78.79 8.41

1.57 0.120

Group 2 (n=30) 75.90 8.50

Prior to the utilization of the independent samples t-test, an F-test was used to determine whether or not the
variances of the population are equal. Results in Table 1 show that the variances of group 1 (var=70.8) and group 2
(var=72.3) are the statistically same, F(69,29)=1.02, p>0.05. In addition, independent samples t-test was used to
show that the scores of Math in group 1 differs with group 2. Table 2 revealed that the scores of group 1 ( M=78.8,
s=8.4) is statistically the same as group 2 (M=75.9, s=8.5),t(98)=1.6, p>0.05. This indicates that the new method of
teaching does not affect Math performance of student.
 Interpretation

not significant

Interpretation

not significant

mine whether or not the

oup 1 (var=70.8) and group 2
amples t-test was used to
scores of group 1 (M=78.8,
tes that the new method of
 extrinsic
Respondent group Math Science motivation
1 1 88 88 4.5
2 1 86 86 4.3
3 1 88 88 1.45
5 1 77 77 4.34
7 1 76 76 3.54
10 1 77 86 4.23
12 1 76 77 4.02
14 1 66 78 4.23
15 1 56 76 3.21
18 1 77 86 3.32
21 1 76 77 4.23
22 1 55 78 3.65
23 1 67 76 4.02
25 1 76 86 4.12
28 1 88 77 3.91
31 1 77 77 4.12
33 1 78 86 4.65
35 1 88 77 4.12
36 1 67 77 4.12
38 1 87 76 3.12
41 1 66 88 3.87
42 1 66 77 3.1
44 1 77 78 2.5
45 1 77 86 4.87
47 1 78 77 2.11
48 1 78 77 2.54
49 1 89 78 4.03
51 1 87 77 4.54
52 1 66 86 3.86
53 1 77 88 4.99
54 1 66 77 2.43
55 1 67 77 4.43
57 1 78 86 4.12
58 1 76 88 4.98
60 1 88 77 4.89
61 1 87 78 3.99
62 1 89 76 4.87
63 1 87 77 4.03
64 1 88 86 4.23
65 1 77 88 4.54
66 1 87 77 3.99
67 1 77 86 4.87
68 1 67 88 4.03
69 1 76 77 4.23
70 1 77 77 4.54
72 1 87 76 4.99
 73 1 77 77 4.23
74 1 87 86 3.21
75 1 77 88 3.99
77 1 78 77 4.03
78 1 77 86 2.12
79 1 87 88 4.54
80 1 88 77 3.86
81 1 89 77 3.75
83 1 87 76 3.45
84 1 88 77 3.1
85 1 78 86 3.12
86 1 77 86 2
88 1 87 77 3.11
89 1 66 77 2.34
90 1 76 78 3.11
91 1 78 76 2
92 1 73 77 3.11
94 1 86 88 3.12
95 1 81 77 4.43
96 1 90 77 4
97 1 90 78 4
98 1 87 77 4
99 1 76 74 4
100 1 74 68 4
Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2
88 50 Mean 78.785714286 73.666666667
86 45 Variance 70.779503106 124.16091954
88 70 count 70 30
77 87 df 69 29
76 66 F-statistic 1.7541931505
77 77 p-value 0.0294980682 alpha=0.05
76 76 decision reject the null hypothesis. This means that the variances of the group are not equ
66 56 interpretation Significant
56 65
77 77
76 77 standard deviation 8.4130555154 11.142751884
55 66 df 98
67 77 Hypothesize mean 0
76 77 t-statistic 2.2557584524
88 66 p-value 0.0263088324 alpha=0.05
77 77 decision reject the null hypothesis. This implies that the means of the group are not equal
78 89 interpretation Significant
88 78
67 88
87 76
66 67
66 66
77 87
77 67
78 78
78 78
89 67
87 87
66 89
77 84
66
67
78
76
88
87
89
87
88
77
87
77
67
76
77
87
77
87
77
78
77
87
88
89
87
88
78
77
87
66
76
78
73
86
81
90
90
87
76
74
ces of the group are not equal.

s of the group are not equal.

Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2
88 50 Mean 78.785714286 73.666666667
86 45 Variance 70.779503106 124.16091954
88 70 count 70 30
77 87 df 69 29
76 66 F-statistic 1.7541931505
77 77 p-value 0.0294980682
76 76 decision reject the null hypothesis
66 56 interpretation significant
56 65
77 77
76 77 standard deviation 8.4130555154 11.142751884
55 66 df 98
67 77 Hypothesize mean 0
76 77 t-statistic 2.2557584524
88 66 p-value 0.0263088324
77 77 decision reject the null hypothesis
78 89 interpretation significant
88 78
67 88
87 76
66 67
66 66
77 87
77 67
78 78
78 78
89 67
87 87
66 89
77 84
66
67
78
76
88
87
89
87
88
77
87
77
67
76
77
87
77
87
77
78
77
87
88
89
87
88
78
77
87
66
76
78
73
86
81
90
90
87
76
74
Table 3. Comparison of the variances and the means of the two groups.
Group Variance Mean F-stat p-value Interpretation
Group 1 (n=70) 70.78 78.79
1.75 0.029 Significant
Group 2 (n=30) 124.16 73.67

Table 4. Comparison of the means and standard deviation of the two groups.
Group Mean Standard deviation t-stat p-value Interpretation
Group 1 (n=70) 78.79 8.41
2.26 0.026 Significant
Group 2 (n=30) 73.67 11.14

Prior to the utilization of the independent samples t-test, an F-test was used to determine
whether or not the variances of the population are equal. Results in Table 3 show that the
variances of group 1 (var=70.8) and group 2 (var=124.2) are the statistically not same,
F(69,29)=1.75, p<0.05. In addition, independent samples t-test was used to show that the
scores of Math in group 1 differs with group 2. Table 2 revealed that the scores of group 1
(M=78.8, s=8.4) is statistically the not same as group 2 (M=73.7, s=11.1),t(98)=2.3, p<0.05.
This indicates that the new method of teaching affect Math performance of student.
 extrinsic
Respondent group Math Science motivation
12 1 76 77 4.02
14 1 66 78 4.23
45 1 77 86 4.87
47 1 78 77 2.11
48 1 78 77 2.54
49 1 89 78 4.03
51 1 87 77 4.54
52 1 66 86 3.86
53 1 77 88 4.99
54 1 66 77 2.43
55 1 67 77 4.43
57 1 78 86 4.12
58 1 76 88 4.98
60 1 88 77 4.89
61 1 87 78 3.99
62 1 89 76 4.87
63 1 87 77 4.03
64 1 88 86 4.23
65 1 77 88 4.54
66 1 87 77 3.99
67 1 77 86 4.87
68 1 67 88 4.03
69 1 76 77 4.23
70 1 77 77 4.54
72 1 87 76 4.99
73 1 77 77 4.23
74 1 87 86 3.21
75 1 77 88 3.99
77 1 78 77 4.03
78 1 77 86 2.12
79 1 87 88 4.54
80 1 88 77 3.86
81 1 89 77 3.75
83 1 87 76 3.45
84 1 88 77 3.1
85 1 78 86 3.12
86 1 77 86 2
88 1 87 77 3.11
89 1 66 77 2.34
90 1 76 78 3.11
91 1 78 76 2
92 1 73 77 3.11
94 1 86 88 3.12
95 1 81 77 4.43
96 1 90 77 4
97 1 90 78 4
 98 1 87 77 4
99 1 76 74 4
100 1 74 68 4
Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2
76 88 Mean 80.040816327 75.882352941
66 86 Variance 54.539965986 82.105882353
77 88 standard deviation 7.3851178722 9.061229627
78 77 count 49 51
78 77 df 98
89 78 Hypothesize mean 0
87 76 z-statistic 2.5200587916
66 77 p-value 0.0133490561 alpha=0.05
77 87 decision reject the null hypothesis. this means that the group are not equal in
66 77 interpretation Significant
67 66
78 77
76 56
88 76
87 56
89 77
87 65
88 77
77 76
87 55
77 67
67 77
76 76
77 66
87 77
77 88
87 77
77 66
78 77
77 77
87 78
88 89
89 88
87 67
88 78
78 87
77 88
87 76
66 66
76 66
78 67
73 77
86 66
81 87
90 67
90 78
87 78
76 67
74 87
89
84
means that the group are not equal in terms of math scores
Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2
76 88 Mean 80.040816327 75.882352941
66 86 Variance 54.539965986 82.105882353
77 88 standard deviation 7.3851178722 9.061229627
78 77 count 49 51
78 77 df 98
89 78 Hypothesize mean 0
87 76 z-statistic 2.5200587916
66 77 p-value 0.0133490561
77 87 decision reject the null hypothesis. this means that
66 77 interpretation significant
67 66
78 77
76 56
88 76
87 56
89 77
87 65
88 77
77 76
87 55
77 67
67 77
76 76
77 66
87 77
77 88
87 77
77 66
78 77
77 77
87 78
88 89
89 88
87 67
88 78
78 87
77 88
87 76
66 66
76 66
78 67
73 77
86 66
81 87
90 67
90 78
87 78
76 67
74 87
89
84
Table 5. Comparison of the means and standard deviation of the two groups.
Group Mean Standard deviation z-stat p-value Interpretation
Group 1 (n=49) 80.04 7.39
2.52 0.013 Significant
Group 2 (n=51) 75.88 9.06

Z-test two-sample for means was used to show that the scores of Math in group 1 differs
with group 2. Table 5 revealed that the scores of group 1 (n=49, M=80.0, s=7.4) is
statistically the different as group 2 (n=51, M=75.5, s=9.0),z(98)=2.8, p<0.05. This
indicates that the new method of teaching affect Math performance of student.
 extrinsic
RespondentS group Math Science motivation
1 1 88 88 4.5
2 1 86 86 4.3
3 1 88 88 1.45
4 2 77 77 2.34
5 1 77 77 4.34
6 2 78 78 2.34
7 1 76 76 3.54
8 2 77 77 2.13
9 1 87 88 3.54
10 1 77 86 4.23
11 2 66 88 2.43
12 1 76 77 4.02
13 2 77 77 2.45
14 1 66 78 4.23
15 1 56 76 3.21
16 2 76 77 2.21
17 2 56 88 2.13
18 1 77 86 3.32
19 2 65 88 2.34
20 2 77 77 1.65
21 1 76 77 4.23
22 1 55 78 3.65
23 1 67 76 4.02
24 2 77 77 2.12
25 1 76 86 4.12
26 2 66 88 2.98
27 2 77 77 2.96
28 1 88 77 3.91
29 2 77 78 2.11
30 2 66 76 2.22
31 1 77 77 4.12
32 2 77 87 2.34
33 1 78 86 4.65
34 2 89 88 2.12
35 1 88 77 4.12
36 1 67 77 4.12
37 2 78 78 2.15
38 1 87 76 3.12
39 2 88 77 3.12
40 2 76 86 2.12
41 1 66 88 3.87
42 1 66 77 3.1
43 2 67 77 2.4
44 1 77 78 2.5
45 1 77 86 4.87
46 2 66 88 3.21
47 1 78 77 2.11
48 1 78 77 2.54
49 1 89 78 4.03
50 2 87 76 3.21
51 1 87 77 4.54
52 1 66 86 3.86
53 1 77 88 4.99
54 1 66 77 2.43
55 1 67 77 4.43
56 2 67 78 2.34
57 1 78 86 4.12
58 1 76 88 4.98
59 2 78 77 3.11
60 1 88 77 4.89
61 1 87 78 3.99
62 1 89 76 4.87
63 1 87 77 4.03
64 1 88 86 4.23
65 1 77 88 4.54
66 1 87 77 3.99
67 1 77 86 4.87
68 1 67 88 4.03
69 1 76 77 4.23
70 1 77 77 4.54
71 2 78 78 3.86
72 1 87 76 4.99
73 1 77 77 4.23
74 1 87 86 3.21
75 1 77 88 3.99
76 2 67 77 2.54
77 1 78 77 4.03
78 1 77 86 2.12
79 1 87 88 4.54
80 1 88 77 3.86
81 1 89 77 3.75
82 2 87 78 3.21
83 1 87 76 3.45
84 1 88 77 3.1
85 1 78 86 3.12
86 1 77 86 2
87 2 89 88 2
88 1 87 77 3.11
 89 1 66 77 2.34
90 1 76 78 3.11
91 1 78 76 2
92 1 73 77 3.11
93 2 84 86 2
94 1 86 88 3.12
95 1 81 77 4.43
96 1 90 77 4
97 1 90 78 4
98 1 87 77 4
99 1 76 74 4
100 1 74 68 4