0% found this document useful (0 votes)
204 views

Self Concept 3

The self-concept consists of three components: self-image, self-esteem, and ideal self. Self-image is how one sees themselves, which can differ from reality. Self-esteem refers to how much one values themselves and influences behaviors. The ideal self is what one aspires to be, which may not align with actual experiences. Together these components shape one's overall self-concept or perception of who they are.

Uploaded by

Queenie Carale
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
204 views

Self Concept 3

The self-concept consists of three components: self-image, self-esteem, and ideal self. Self-image is how one sees themselves, which can differ from reality. Self-esteem refers to how much one values themselves and influences behaviors. The ideal self is what one aspires to be, which may not align with actual experiences. Together these components shape one's overall self-concept or perception of who they are.

Uploaded by

Queenie Carale
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Self Concept

By Saul McLeod , published 2008


The term self-concept is a general term used to refer to how someone thinks about, evaluates or
perceives themselves. To be aware of oneself is to have a concept of oneself.
Baumeister (1999) provides the following self-concept definition:
"The individual's belief about himself or herself, including the person's attributes and who and
what the self is".
The self-concept is an important term for both social and
humanistic psychology. Lewis (1990) suggests that development of a concept of self has two
aspects:
(1) The Existential Self
This is 'the most basic part of the self-scheme or self-concept; the sense of being separate and
distinct from others and the awareness of the constancy of the self' (Bee, 1992).
The child realizes that they exist as a separate entity from others and that they continue to exist
over time and space.
According to Lewis awareness of the existential self begins as young as two to three months old
and arises in part due to the relation the child has with the world. For example, the child smiles
and someone smiles back, or the child touches a mobile and sees it move.
(2) The Categorical Self
Having realized that he or she exists as a separate experiencing being, the child next becomes
aware that he or she is also an object in the world.
Just as other objects including people have properties that can be experienced (big, small, red,
smooth and so on) so the child is becoming aware of him or her self as an object which can be
experienced and which has properties.
The self too can be put into categories such as age, gender, size or skill. Two of the first categories
to be applied are age (“I am 3”) and gender (“I am a girl”).
In early childhood. the categories children apply to themselves are very concrete (e.g., hair color,
height and favorite things). Later, self-description also begins to include reference to internal
psychological traits, comparative evaluations and to how others see them.
Carl Rogers (1959) believes that the self-concept has three different components:
• The view you have of yourself (self-image)
• How much value you place on yourself (self-esteem or self-worth)
• What you wish you were really like (ideal-self)
Self-image (how you see yourself)
This does not necessarily have to reflect reality. Indeed a person with anorexia who is thin may
have a self image in which the person believes they are fat. A person's self image is affected by
many factors, such as parental influences, friends, the media etc.
Kuhn (1960) investigated the self-image by using The Twenty Statements Test .
He asked people to answer the question 'Who am I?' in 20 different ways. He found that the
responses could be divided into two major groups. These were social roles (external or objective
aspects of oneself such as son, teacher, friend) and
personality traits (internal or affective aspects of oneself such as gregarious, impatient, humorous).
The list of answers to the question “Who Am I?” probably include examples of each of the
following four types of responses:
1) Physical Description : I’m tall, have blue eyes...etc.
2) Social Roles : We are all social beings whose behavior is shaped to some extent by the roles we
play. Such roles as student, housewife, or member of the football team not only help others to
recognize us but also help us to know what is expected of us in various situations.
3) Personal Traits: These are the third dimension of our self-descriptions. “I’m
impulsive...I’m generous...I tend to worry a lot”...etc.
4) Existential Statements (abstract ones): These can range from "I’m a child of the universe" to
"I’m a human being" to "I’m a spiritual being"...etc.
Typically young people describe themselves more in terms of personal traits, whereas older people
feel defined to a greater extent by their social roles.
Self-esteem (the extent to which you value yourself)
Self-esteem (also known as self-worth) refers to the extent to which we like accept or approve of
ourselves, or how much we value ourselves. Self-esteem always involves a degree of evaluation
and we may have either a positive or a negative view of ourselves.
High self-esteem (we have a positive view of ourselves)
This tends to lead to
Confidence in our own abilities
Self-acceptance
Not worrying about what others think
Optimism
Low self-esteem (we have a negative view of ourselves)
This tends to lead to
Lack of confidence
Want to be/look like someone else
Always worrying what others might think
Pessimism
There are several ways of measuring self-esteem. For example, Harrill Self Esteem Inventory is a
questionnaire comprising 15 statements about a range of interest. Another example is the Thematic
Apperception Test (TAT), which is a neutral cartoon given to the participant who then has to
devise a story about what's going on.
Morse and Gergen (1970) showed that in uncertain or anxiety-arousing situations our self-esteem
may change rapidly. Participants were waiting for a job interview in a waiting room. They were
sat with another candidate (a confederate of the experimenter) in one of two conditions:
A) Mr. Clean - dressed in a smart suit, carrying a briefcase opened to reveal a slide rule and books.
B) Mr. Dirty - dressed in an old T-shirt and jeans, slouched over a cheap sex novel.
Self-esteem of participants with Mr. Dirty increased whilst those with Mr. Clean decreased! No
mention made of how this affected subjects’ performance in interview. Level of self-esteem
affects performance at numerous tasks though (Coopersmith, 1967) so could expect Mr. Dirty
subjects to perform better than Mr. Clean.
Even though self-esteem might fluctuate, there are times when we continue to believe good things
about ourselves even when evidence to the contrary exists. This is known as the perseverance
effect.
Miller and Ross (1975) showed that people who believed they had socially desirable
characteristics continued in this belief even when the experimenters tried to get them to believe
the opposite. Does the same thing happen with bad things if we have low self-esteem? Maybe not,
perhaps with very low self-esteem, all we believe about ourselves might be bad.
Argyle (2008) believes there are 4 major factors that influence self-esteem.
1. The Reaction of Others
If people admire us, flatter us, seek out our company, listen attentively and agree with us we tend
to develop a positive self-image. If they avoid us, neglect us, tell us things about ourselves that we
don’t want to hear we develop a negative self-image.
2. Comparison with of Others
If the people we compare ourselves with (our reference group) appear to be more successful,
happier, richer, better looking than ourselves we tend to develop a negative self-image BUT if they
are less successful than us our image will be positive.
3. Social Roles
Some social roles carry prestige e.g., doctor, airline pilot, TV. presenter, premiership footballer and
this promotes self-esteem. Other roles carry stigma. E.g., a prisoner, mental hospital patient, refuse
collector or unemployed person.
4. Identification
Roles aren’t just “out there.” They also become part of our personality i.e. we identity with
the positions we occupy, the roles we play and the groups we belong to.
But just as important as all these factors, are the influence of our parents! (See Coopersmith’s
research.)
Ideal Self (what you'd like to be)
If there is a mismatch between how you see yourself (e.g., your self-image) and what you’d like
to be (e.g., your ideal-self ) then this is likely to affect how much you value yourself.
Therefore, there is an intimate relationship between self-image, ego-ideal and self-esteem.
Humanistic psychologists study this using the Q-Sort Method.
A person’s ideal self may not be consistent with what actually happens in life and experiences of
the person. Hence, a difference may exist between a person’s ideal self and actual experience.
This is called incongruence.
Where a person’s ideal self and actual experience are consistent or very similar, a state of
congruence exists. Rarely, if ever does a total state of congruence exist; all people experience a
certain amount of incongruence. The development of congruence is dependent on unconditional
positive regard. Roger’s believed that for a person to achieve self-actualization they must be in a
state of congruence.
Michael Argyle (2008) says there are four major factors which influence its development:
1. The ways in which others (particularly significant others) react to us.
2. How we think we compare to others
3. Our social roles
4. The extent to which we identify with other people
References
Argyle, M. (2008). Social encounters: Contributions to social interaction. Aldine Transaction
Baumeister, R. F. (Ed.) (1999).
The self in social psychology . Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).
Bee, H. L. (1992). The developing child. London: HarperCollins.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem . San Francisco: Freeman.
Kuhn, M. H. (1960). Self-attitudes by age, sex and professional training. Sociological Quarterly ,
1, 39-56.
Lewis, M. (1990). Self-knowledge and social development in early life. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.),
Handbook of personality (pp. 277-300). New York: Guilford.
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?
Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225
Morse, S. J. & Gergen, K. J. (1970). Social comparison, self-consistency and the concept of self.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 148-156.
Rogers, C. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in
the client-centered framework. In (ed.) S. Koch, Psychology: A study of a science. Vol. 3:
Formulations of the person and the social context. New York: McGraw Hill.
How to reference this article:
McLeod, S. A. (2008). Self concept. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/self-
concept.html
Further Information
Home | About | A-Z Index |
Privacy Policy | Contact Us
Back to top
This workis licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.
Company Registration no: 10521846
Self-Esteem
Carl Rogers
Humanism
Social Roles
Person Centered Therapy
Self-concept
Self-concept Book Chapter
The Harrill Self Esteem Inventory
behaviorist therapy
psychological evaluation
a level psychology memory
abno

You might also like