Tips in Identifying Errors
Tips in Identifying Errors
Tip #1: There’s a point in the sentence at which the dependent component
ends. Ensure that the words being utilized at this point complete the
sentence as is conventional.
Tip #2: Do not transform an object into a person simply because it involves
people or consists of them. It is still an object. Watch for singular and plural
forms in this context.
I won’t launch into a great rant here – we’re speaking of a committee in the sentence,
right? The “their” should be an “its” – a committee, whilst it consists of people, is an
item. In order to employ “their” here, “the committee has” would have to become “the
committee members have”.
Tip #3: Watch for agreement in any form. Do not treat people and their
actions as interchangeable items where grammar is concerned.
“At the music recital, Alexandra enjoyed listening to her friend Mohammed’s insightful
interpretation, which she thought was more sophisticated than the other performers.”
This one, again, is brief – Alexandra enjoyed listening to her friend’s insightful
interpretation. Careful. It wasn’t stated that Alexandra enjoyed listening to Mohammed
– she enjoyed listening to his interpretation, as supported by there being a “which” at
the beginning of the next clause. If we were talking about Mohammed, then we would
have utilized a “who”; furthermore, we might not have mentioned his interpretation at
all. We need, then, to complete this sentence with a comment about the interpretation
and not Mohammed – that’s the error. She thought his interpretation more
sophisticated, but the sentence currently speaks of people.
A correct sentence might read: “At the music recital, Alexandra enjoyed listening to her
friend Mohammed’s insightful interpretation, which she thought was more
sophisticated than those of the other performers.”
Okay, when one reads this, something should just seem wrong. If you ever sense
something strange about a given sentence, read it aloud, or try having an unrelated
conversation on the topic. Your doing so should be greeted with a cringe this time
around. Unless a protest was held on a conventional painting*, our error lies in the first
underlined portion. You protest against something, not on it.
REPORT THIS AD
This is one of the most common grammatical errors that people consistently make. Ask
yourself what the board found out about. Evidently, it found out about the quality of
academic programs. Careful. The quality of the academic programs. That’s a singular
noun. We’re describing the quality, not the programs, so the “were” should be a “was”.
Quite simply, you go about heavily veiled, not “heavy veiled”. Though a word may
appear as a noun far more often than it does as a verb, it can still be a verb in a certain
context. Try asking yourself something like “How did Maude Adams go about?”
“She went about veiled – heavily veiled.”
Tip #7: Agree, agree, agree. If we’re speaking of many people, then we use
“they”. If we’re speaking of a person, then we do not use “they”, and in its
place use something like “he or she”. “Everyone”, “someone”, and “anyone”
all utilize “he or she” – note that they’re all speaking of some one person.
“One” utilizes “one” – it may sound repetitive, but that’s fine.
Tip #8: Read over the whole sentence first. You may be tempted to think
that the first questionable item you see is an error; upon reading further,
you’ll realize that it wasn’t a problem.
As the eighth tip predicts, “penalties on” may suddenly seem suspicious; that phrasing is
perfectly idiomatic. Read on!
As the seventh tip suggests, the error is the final portion – the error is using “he or she”
to describe “drivers”. This should not be done – “they are involved” is the correct
piece.
Here are some examples of this phenomenon:
1. If one understands how to exercise care in preparing specimens, then one shouldn’t
experience too many problems with the purification protocol.
2. Everyone knows that he or she should remain stationary until we call.
3. The author will transport the reader into a world from which he or she will not want
to depart.
The commonly-made error occurs with the third sentence – people might often say the
following:
“The author will transport the reader into a world from which they will not want to
depart.”
Yes, it’s quick, but it’s incorrect.