Scribd
Upload
73 views

Pre-Historic Art Contemporary Art

This document provides an overview of different perspectives on what defines art. It discusses how art has existed for as long as humankind and served both practical and expressive purposes. Over time, philosophers have questioned and analyzed the meaning and nature of art. There are debates around whether art represents creative expression, serves as a medium for communication, or exists to generate thoughts and emotions in its audience. The definition of art continues to be discussed and interpreted in various ways by scholars.

Uploaded by

Kuza Anas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
73 views

Pre-Historic Art Contemporary Art

This document provides an overview of different perspectives on what defines art. It discusses how art has existed for as long as humankind and served both practical and expressive purposes. Over time, philosophers have questioned and analyzed the meaning and nature of art. There are debates around whether art represents creative expression, serves as a medium for communication, or exists to generate thoughts and emotions in its audience. The definition of art continues to be discussed and interpreted in various ways by scholars.

Uploaded by

Kuza Anas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Overview

Works of art can tell stories or simply express an aesthetic truth or feeling. Panorama of a section of A
Thousand Li of Mountains and Rivers, a 12th-century painting by Song dynasty artist Wang Ximeng.
In the perspective of the history of art,[9] artistic works have existed for almost as long as humankind:
from early pre-historic art to contemporary art; however, some theorists feel that the typical concept
of "artistic works" fits less well outside modern Western societies. [11] One early sense of the definition
of art is closely related to the older Latin meaning, which roughly translates to "skill" or "craft," as
associated with words such as "artisan." English words derived from this meaning
include artifact, artificial, artifice, medical arts, and military arts. However, there are many other
colloquial uses of the word, all with some relation to its etymology.

20th-century bottle, Twa peoples, Rwanda, Artistic works may serve practical functions, in addition to their
decorative value.

Over time, philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Socrates and Kant, among others, questioned the


meaning of art.[12] Several dialogues in Plato tackle questions about art: Socrates says that poetry is
inspired by the muses, and is not rational. He speaks approvingly of this, and other forms of divine
madness (drunkenness, eroticism, and dreaming) in the Phaedrus (265a–c), and yet in
the Republic wants to outlaw Homer's great poetic art, and laughter as well. In Ion, Socrates gives
no hint of the disapproval of Homer that he expresses in the Republic. The dialogue Ion suggests
that Homer's Iliad functioned in the ancient Greek world as the Bible does today in the modern
Christian world: as divinely inspired literary art that can provide moral guidance, if only it can be
properly interpreted.[13]
With regards to the literary art and the musical arts, Aristotle considered epic poetry, tragedy,
comedy, Dithyrambic poetry and music to be mimetic or imitative art, each varying in imitation by
medium, object, and manner.[14] For example, music imitates with the media of rhythm and harmony,
whereas dance imitates with rhythm alone, and poetry with language. The forms also differ in their
object of imitation. Comedy, for instance, is a dramatic imitation of men worse than average;
whereas tragedy imitates men slightly better than average. Lastly, the forms differ in their manner of
imitation—through narrative or character, through change or no change, and through drama or no
drama.[15] Aristotle believed that imitation is natural to mankind and constitutes one of mankind's
advantages over animals.[16]
The more recent and specific sense of the word art as an abbreviation for creative art or fine
art emerged in the early 17th century.[17] Fine art refers to a skill used to express the artist's creativity,
or to engage the audience's aesthetic sensibilities, or to draw the audience towards consideration of
more refined or finer work of art.
Within this latter sense, the word art may refer to several things: (i) a study of a creative skill, (ii) a
process of using the creative skill, (iii) a product of the creative skill, or (iv) the audience's experience
with the creative skill. The creative arts (art as discipline) are a collection of disciplines which
produce artworks (art as objects) that are compelled by a personal drive (art as activity) and convey
a message, mood, or symbolism for the perceiver to interpret (art as experience). Art is something
that stimulates an individual's thoughts, emotions, beliefs, or ideas through the senses. Works of art
can be explicitly made for this purpose or interpreted on the basis of images or objects. For some
scholars, such as Kant, the sciences and the arts could be distinguished by taking science as
representing the domain of knowledge and the arts as representing the domain of the freedom of
artistic expression.[18]
Often, if the skill is being used in a common or practical way, people will consider it a craft instead of
art. Likewise, if the skill is being used in a commercial or industrial way, it may be
considered commercial art instead of fine art. On the other hand, crafts and design are sometimes
considered applied art. Some art followers have argued that the difference between fine art and
applied art has more to do with value judgments made about the art than any clear definitional
difference.[19] However, even fine art often has goals beyond pure creativity and self-expression. The
purpose of works of art may be to communicate ideas, such as in politically, spiritually, or
philosophically motivated art; to create a sense of beauty (see aesthetics); to explore the nature of
perception; for pleasure; or to generate strong emotions. The purpose may also be seemingly
nonexistent.
The nature of art has been described by philosopher Richard Wollheim as "one of the most elusive
of the traditional problems of human culture". [20] Art has been defined as a vehicle for the expression
or communication of emotions and ideas, a means for exploring and appreciating formal
elements for their own sake, and as mimesis or representation. Art as mimesis has deep roots in the
philosophy of Aristotle.[21] Leo Tolstoy identified art as a use of indirect means to communicate from
one person to another.[21] Benedetto Croce and R. G. Collingwood advanced the idealist view that art
expresses emotions, and that the work of art therefore essentially exists in the mind of the creator. [22]
[23]
 The theory of art as form has its roots in the philosophy of Kant, and was developed in the early
20th century by Roger Fry and Clive Bell. More recently, thinkers influenced by Martin
Heidegger have interpreted art as the means by which a community develops for itself a medium for
self-expression and interpretation.[24] George Dickie has offered an institutional theory of art that
defines a work of art as any artifact upon which a qualified person or persons acting on behalf of the
social institution commonly referred to as "the art world" has conferred "the status of candidate for
appreciation".[25] Larry Shiner has described fine art as "not an essence or a fate but something we
have made. Art as we have generally understood it is a European invention barely two hundred
years old."[26]
Art may be characterized in terms of mimesis (its representation of reality), narrative (storytelling),
expression, communication of emotion, or other qualities. During the Romantic period, art came to
be seen as "a special faculty of the human mind to be classified with religion and science". [27]

You might also like