Bisection Method of Solving A Nonlinear Equation: After Reading This Chapter, You Should Be Able To
Bisection Method of Solving A Nonlinear Equation: After Reading This Chapter, You Should Be Able To
03
Bisection Method of Solving a Nonlinear Equation
1. follow the algorithm of the bisection method of solving a nonlinear equation, 2. use the
bisection method to solve examples of finding roots of a nonlinear equation, and
3. enumerate the advantages and disadvantages of the bisection method.
Theorem
An equation f ( x) = 0 , where f (x ) is a real continuous function, has at least one root between
x and u x i f ( ) ( ) < 0 u
f x f x (See Figure 1).
Note that if f (x ) f ( xu ) > 0 , there may or may not be any root between
x and u x
(Figures 2 and 3). If ( ) ( ) < 0 u f x f x , then there may be more than one root between x
and u x (Figure 4). So the theorem only guarantees one root between x a nd u x .
Bisection method
Since the method is based on finding the root between two points, the method falls
under the category of bracketing methods.
Since the root is bracketed between two points, x a nd u x , one can find the mid
point, mx b etween x and u x . This gives us two new intervals
1. x and mx , and
2. m x and u x .
03.03.1
03.03.2 Chapter 03.03
f (x)
xℓ
xux
Figure 1 At least one root exists between the two points if the function is real, continuous,
and changes sign.
f (x)
xℓ x ux
Figure 2 If the function f (x ) does not change sign between the two points, roots of the equation f
(x) = 0 may still exist between the two points.
u
xℓ x x
xℓ x u x
Figure 3 If the function f (x ) does not change sign between two points, there may not be
any roots for the equation f (x ) = 0 between the two points.
f (x)
u
x x
xℓ
Figure 4 If the function f (x ) changes sign between the two points, more than one root for the
equation f ( x) = 0 may exist between the two points.
Is the root now between x and mx o r between mx a nd u x ? Well, one can find the sign of ( ) ( )
m f x f x , and if f (x ) f (xm ) < 0 then the new bracket is between x and mx , otherwise, it is
between mx and u x . So, you can see that you are literally halving the interval. As one repeats
this process, the width of the interval [ ] u x , x
becomes
smaller and smaller, and you can
zero in to the root of the equation f (x) = 0 . The algorithm for the bisection method is given
as follows.
03.03.4 Chapter 03.03
Algorithm for the bisection method
The steps to apply the bisection method to find the root of the equation f (x) = 0 are 1. Choose
x a nd u x a s two guesses for the root such that ( ) ( ) < 0 u f x f x
, or in other words, f
(x) changes sign between x and u x .
2. Estimate the root, mx , of the equation f ( x) = 0 as the mid-point between x and u x as
x +
xx
m
u
2=
3. Now check the following
) f ( xm ) < 0 , then the root lies between x a nd mx ; then x = x and u m x =
a) If f ( x
x .
b) If f (x ) f (xm ) > 0 , then the root lies between m x a nd u x ; then m x = x
and u u x = x
.
c) If f ( x ) f (xm ) = 0 ; then the root is mx . Stop the algorithm if this is true.
4. Find the new estimate of the root
x +
xx
m
u
2=
new
Example 1
You are working for ‘DOWN THE TOILET COMPANY’ that makes floats for ABC
commodes. The floating ball has a specific gravity of 0.6 and has a radius of 5.5 cm. You are
asked to find the depth to which the ball is submerged when floating in water.
The equation that gives the depth x to which the ball is submerged under water is given
by 0.165 3.993 10 0 3 2 4 − + ⋅ = − x x
Use the bisection method of finding roots of equations to find the depth x t o which the ball
is submerged under water. Conduct three iterations to estimate the root of the above
equation. Find the absolute relative approximate error at the end of each iteration, and the
number of significant digits at least correct at the end of each iteration.
Solution
From the physics of the problem, the ball would be submerged between x = 0 and x = 2R ,
where
R= radius of the ball,
that is
0 ≤ x ≤
2R
0 ≤ x ≤ 2(0.055)
0 ≤ x ≤ 0.11
Lets us assume
= 0, = 0.11 u x x
Check if the function changes sign between x and u x .
3244
( ) (0) (0) 0.165(0) 3.993 10 3.993 10 − − f x =
−+⋅=⋅
f =
3
244
( ) (0.11) (0.11) 0.165(0.11) 3.993 10 2.662 10 − − f xu = −+⋅=−⋅
f =
Hence
( ) ( ) (0) (0.11) (3.993 10 )( 2.662 10 ) 0 4 4 = = ⋅ − ⋅ < − − f x f x f f u
So there is at least one root between x and u x , that is between 0 and
0.11. Iteration 1
The estimate of the root is
+
x =
u
m
x x 2
0 + 0.11
=
2
= 0.055
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 3 2 4 5 0.055 0.055 0.165 0.055 3.993 10 6.655 10 − − f xm = f
= − + ⋅ = ⋅ ( ) ( ) (0) (0.055) (3 .993 10 )(6.655 10 ) 0 4 4 = = ⋅ ⋅ > − − f x f
x f f m
03.03.6 Chapter 03.03
Hence the root is bracketed between mx and u x , that is, between 0.055 and 0.11. So, the lower
and upper limit of the new bracket is
= 0.055, = 0.11 u x x
At this point, the absolute relative approximate error ∈a cannot
be calculated as we do not
have a previous approximation.
Iteration 2
The estimate of the root is
+
x =
u
m
x x 2
0.055 + 0.11
=
2
= 0.0825
3
244
( ) (0.0825) (0.0825) 0.165(0.0825) 3.993 10 1.622 10 − − f xm = f = − + ⋅
= − ⋅ ( ) ( ) (0.055) (0.0825) (6.655 10 ) ( 1.622 10 )
0 5 4 = = ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ < − −
f x f x f f m
Hence, the root is bracketed between x a nd m x , that is, between 0.055 and 0.0825. So the
lower and upper limit of the new bracket is
x =
0.055, xu = 0.0825
The absolute relative approximate error ∈a at the end of Iteration 2 is
new old
xx
−
⋅ ∈=
100 new
mm
a m
x
0.0825 0.055 −
⋅ =
100
0.0825
= 33.33%
None of the significant digits are at least correct in the estimated root of xm = 0.0825 because
the absolute relative approximate error is greater than 5%.
Iteration 3
+
x =
u
m
x x 2
0.055 + 0.0825
=
2
= 0.06875
3245
( ) (0.06875) (0.06875) 0.165(0.06875) 3.993 10 5.563 10 − − f xm = f = −+⋅
= − ⋅ ( ) ( ) (0.055) (0.06875) (6.655 10 ) ( 5.563 10 ) 0 5 5 = = ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ < − f x f x f f
m
Hence, the root is bracketed between x a nd mx , that is, between 0.055 and 0.06875. So the
lower and upper limit of the new bracket is
= 0.055, = 0.06875 u x x
The absolute relative approximate error ∈a at the ends of Iteration 3 is
Bisection Method 03.03.7
new old
xx
−
⋅ ∈=
100 new
mm
a m
x
0.06875 0.0825 −
⋅ =
100
0.06875
= 20%
Still none of the significant digits are at least correct in the estimated root of the equation as
the absolute relative approximate error is greater than 5%.
Seven more iterations were conducted and these iterations are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Root of f ( x) = 0 as function of number of iterations for bisection method.
Iteration x u x x
m ∈a %
( ) m f x
log(0.3442) ≤ 2 − m
m ≤ 2 − log(0.3442) = 2.463
So
m= 2
The number of significant digits at least correct in the estimated root of 0.06241 at the end of
the th 10 iteration is 2.
1 = =
Figure 7 The equation ( ) 0 x
as no root but changes sign.
fxh
NONLINEAR EQUATIONS
Topic Bisection method of solving a nonlinear equation
Summary These are textbook notes of bisection method of finding roots of nonlinear
equation, including convergence and pitfalls.
Major General Engineering
Authors Autar Kaw
Date January 15, 2012
Web Site http://numericalmethods.eng.usf.edu