Scribd
Upload
6K views2 pages

Box 16 HGDG Pimme CHECKLIST FOR PROJ - MONITORING AND EVALUATION

This document provides a checklist for assessing gender and development (GAD) integration in project management and implementation. It contains 16 elements scored on a scale of 0 to 2. The summarized results are: 1) The project scored 8 out of a maximum 16, indicating partial GAD integration. 2) Areas of strength included supportive project leadership, technically competent staff, and commitment from the Philippine government agency involved. 3) Areas for improvement included ensuring GAD concerns are incorporated in implementation documents, having an operational GAD strategy, and involving both women and men in project phases.

Uploaded by

Ronnie Manao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6K views2 pages

Box 16 HGDG Pimme CHECKLIST FOR PROJ - MONITORING AND EVALUATION

This document provides a checklist for assessing gender and development (GAD) integration in project management and implementation. It contains 16 elements scored on a scale of 0 to 2. The summarized results are: 1) The project scored 8 out of a maximum 16, indicating partial GAD integration. 2) Areas of strength included supportive project leadership, technically competent staff, and commitment from the Philippine government agency involved. 3) Areas for improvement included ensuring GAD concerns are incorporated in implementation documents, having an operational GAD strategy, and involving both women and men in project phases.

Uploaded by

Ronnie Manao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Box.

16 GAD Checklist for Project Management and Implementation

Response (col.2) Score of the Result or Comment


Element and Guide Question (col. 1) No Partly Yes Item of (col.4)
(2a) Yes (2b) (2c) Element
(col.3)
1.0 Supportive project management
2.0
(max score: 2; for each item, 1.0)
1.1 Is the project leadership (project
steering/advisory committee or
(management) supportive of GAD or
gender equality goals? For instance, has it 1.0
mobilized adequate resources to support
strategies that address gender issues or
constraints to women’s and men’s
participation during project
implementation? (possible scores)
0,0.5,1.0
1.2 Has adequate gender expertise has
been made available throughout the
project? For example, are gender issues 1.0
adequately addressed in the project
management contract and scope of
services? (possible scores: 0,0.5,1.0)
2.0 Technically competent staff or
consultants (max score: 2; for each item, 2.0
0.67)
2.1 Are the project staff members
technically prepared to promote gender
equality or integrate GAD in their
respective positions/locations? OR, is
there an individual or group responsible
0.67
for promoting gender equality in the
project? OR, has the project tapped local
gender experts to assist its staff/ partners
in integrating gender equality in their
activities or in project operations?
(possible scores: 0,0.33.0.67)
2.2 Does the project require the presence
of women and men in the project 0.67
implementation team? ( possible scores:
0, 0.33,0.67.
2.3 Does the project require its
monitoring and evaluation team
(personnel or consultants) to have 0.67
technical competence for GAD
evaluation? (possible scores: 0, 0.33,0.67
3.0 Committed Philippine Government
agency (max score: 2; for each item,1)
2.0
3.1 Are regular agency personnel involved
in implementing project GAD initiatives?
OR, are agency officials or personnel 1.0
participating in GAD training sponsored by
the project?(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0
3.2 Has the agency included the project’s
GAD efforts in its GAD plans? (possible) 1.0
HGDG PIMME Checklist Box 16 Project Implementation and Management and Box 17 Monitoring and Evaluation Checklist

Page 1
Scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
4.0 GAD implementation process and procedures (MAX SCORE: 2;
2.0
For each item, 05.)
4.1 Do project implementation
documents incorporate a discussion of
GAD concerns? IF APPLICABLE: Are 0.50
subproject proposals required to have
explicit GAD objectives and to have
been supported by gender analysis?
(possible scores: 0,0.25,0.50 )
4.2 Does the project have an
operational GAD Strategy?
Alternately, has the project been 0.50
effective in Integrating GAD into the
development activity? (possible scores
: 0,0.25, 0.50
4.3 Does the project have a budget for
activities that will build capacities for
doing GAD tasks (gender analysis, 0.50
monitoring, etc.) (Possible scores: 0,
0.25,0.50).
4.4 Does the project involve women
and men in various phases of
subprojects? (Possible scores: 0, 0.25, 0.50
0.50.
TOTAL GAD SCORE-PROJECT
MANAGEMENT 8.0
HGDG PIMME Checklist Box 16 Project Implementation and Management and Box 17 Monitoring and Evaluation
Checklist

Page 2

You might also like