Case Study
Case Study
Breanna Carels
Brandon University
CONTRASTING LEARNING STYLES 2
My husband and I have been together for ten years and we have always recognized that
we are very different from each other. We have very different personalities, we have a unique
way of approaching new situations and challenges, and the way we learn and process
information varies. The saying that opposites attract holds true in our relationship. We both
completed the Kolb learning styles questionnaire and it was no surprise that our results were
opposing learning styles manifests as both a challenge and an asset in our relationship.
Reading the descriptions of each learning style ahead of taking the questionnaire, it was
no surprise to me that my learning style result was assimilator. To determine your learning style
you look at both the processing continuum and the perception continuum (McLeod, 2017,
“Learning Styles,” para. 2). I process information by watching, and respond by thinking about
this new knowledge. As a student I always enjoyed lectures because I could take notes as the
professor was talking and then find time later to review and reorganize this information (Terry,
2019, p. 3). Classes that had you actively discussing your thoughts as new information was
being presented, or immediately applying the knowledge in a hands on experiment made me very
nervous. Another thing that is important to me is to have a very clear explanation of assignment
expectations (McLeod, 2017, “Assimilating,” para. 1). When a teacher gave an assignment with
creative freedom, I would always be asking for clearer guidelines and I would never feel
have time to watch and analyze a situation, which are the qualities of an assimilator learning
style.
CONTRASTING LEARNING STYLES 3
On the other hand, my husband received a learning style result of accommodator, which
is the polar opposite learning style. I learn through watching and thinking, where as he learns
better through doing and feeling. My husband has always been a hands on guy and he is not
afraid to try anything (McLeod, 2017, “Accommodating,” para. 1). There are many skills he has
now that he has acquired through a hands on approach. He built a wooden camper, wired a
projector and sound system in his homemade movie theatre, completed mechanic work on
machinery, and built many pieces of furniture primarily through a hands on trial and error
approach. He is always researching and using the information of others to help teach him how to
do just about anything he sets his mind to (McLeod, 2017, “Accommodating,” para. 2). If a
problem arises for him he does not waste time turning to other people or the internet to see how
others have approached the situation (Terry, 2019, p. 3). Another thing my husband loves is
carrying out plans or looking for new things to try and experience (Terry, 2019, p. 3). He
constantly has a house or yard project on the go and is always trying to plan our next adventure.
Through the years, our relationship has been affected in different ways because of our
opposing learning styles. My husband and I each have learning preferences and we tend to focus
more on certain aspects of Kolb’s learning cycle (Peterson, DeCato, & Kolb, 2015, p. 229). This
is sometimes challenging when my husband is ready to dive right into a new experience and I
need time to process and plan. In general, we have found that our opposing learning styles
balance out and make our relationship stronger. Although individuals are not able to use all parts
of the learning cycle at once, together we use all four parts of the cycle and have a balanced
learning process (Peterson et al., 2015, p. 230). My husband has even helped me as a teacher in
developing assignments and projects for students. He has mentioned that he would have
CONTRASTING LEARNING STYLES 4
appreciated more hands on assignments and freedom in projects and I always keep that in the
back of my mind when making plans for my own classroom. It is very important for students to
have the opportunities to pursue interests and create without boundaries (Sanfelippo, 2017, p.
82). Recently we have entered a new stage in our relationship, parenthood. There is so much to
learn and new things are thrown our way daily, so we are happy to work through the experiences
of parenthood together. After completing this learning styles assessment, we had a discussion
about our son and what we thought his learning style might be. Learning style preferences are
developed in infancy (Peterson et al., 2015, p. 231) so it will be interesting for us to watch him
All individuals have preferences in how they process and perceive new information,
which indicates their learning style. For myself it is important to have time to watch and think
about new information, which means I have an assimilating learning style. My husband on the
other hand has an accommodating learning style because he experiences new information by
doing and feeling. This has manifested itself as both a challenge and an asset in our relationship.
Recognizing we have different learning styles has been helpful in our relationship. Now
knowing that we learn differently we can use this information to become balanced learners in
References
McLeod, S. A. (2017, October 24). Kolb’s learning styles and experiential learning cycle. Simply
kolb.html.
Peterson, K., DeCato, L., & Kolb, D. A. (2015). Moving and Learning. Journal of Experiential
Journals database.
Sanfelippo, J. S. (2017). Hacking leadership: 10 ways great leaders inspire learning that
teachers, students, and parents love. Cleveland, OH: Times 10 Publications. Retrieved
Terry, M. (2019, Spring). Kolb’s experiential learning model. Graduate Scholarly Writing lesson