S V College of Engineering
S V College of Engineering
Karakambadi, Tirupati.
DEPARTMENT OF
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
LECTURE NOTES
Performance Management
(17E00314)
MBA III Semester (R17)
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY ANANTAPUR
Text books:
Performance Management, A.S.Kohli, T.Deb,Oxford.
Prem Chadha, Performance Management, McMillan.
References:
Performance Management, Bagchi, Cengage Learnings.
Performance Appraisal and Management, Sharma, Davinder, HPH
Performance Management, Herman,Aguinis, Pearson Education.
Performance Management and Appraisal Systems, T.V.Rao, Response.
Performance management, Kandula, PHI.
360 Degree Feedback and Assessment and Development Centres, T.V.Rao, Excel.
Performance Management, Dinesh k.Srivatsava, Excel
INDEX
S.NO UNI TOPIC PG.NO
T
I INTRODUCTION TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
1 Concept
4 Purpose
5 Significance
6 Concept- Benefits
7 Characteristics of Mentor
8 Mentoring process
13 Counseling-Functions
14 Counseling Process
5 LEARNING ORGANISATION
Concept
Performance - “the accomplishment of a given task with the set standards, precision, quality and
completeness”.
Performance management is a continuous process of identifying, measuring and developing
performance in organisations by linking each individual’s performance and objectives to the
organisation’s overall mission and goals.
Link to mission and goals - Performance management requires that managers ensure that employees’
activities and outputs are congruent with the organisation’s goals and, consequently, help the
organisation gain a competitive business advantage. Performance management therefore creates a
direct link between employee performance and organisational goals, and makes the employees’
contribution to the organisation explicit.
Transparency
The system should be transparent, free from partiality, bias and discrimination among the
employees. If not, the base of the system itself will not be strong to build anything above that. For
example, work allocation, promotions, transfers, incentives, and bonus – if based on Performance
management, then the system should be transparent and gives no room for employees to complaint.
Employee Empowerment
Participative and empowered employees take the responsibility well. They develop the
belongingness towards the organisation. Recognizing and rewarding the employees brings them
together to work and achieve.
Amicable Workplace
A work environment which attracts the employee rather than expecting the week end to be away
from the workplace is the principle. The workplace should be congenial, warm and amicable to the
employees. This helps in improving the quality of work life and balancing the work life.
Purpose Meaning
Strategic To help top management achieve strategic business objectives
Administrative To furnish valid and useful information for making administrative
decisions about employees
Information To inform employees about how they are doing and about the
organisation’s and the supervisor’s expectations
Developmental To allow managers to provide coaching to their employees
Organisational To provide information to be used in workplace planning and allocation
maintenance of human resources
Documentation To collect useful information that can be used for various purposes
(e.g., test development, personnel decisions)
Significance:
Working towards common goals
We often get so caught up in our daily work routine that we forget about our purpose in an
organization. Individual performance drives organizational performance. It is important to ensure
everyone understands this agency’s vision and goals, how their work fits in to the organization, and
how they contribute to our mission accomplishment. Doing this increases engagement and improves
our program delivery.
When employees and supervisors have a clear understanding of their specific job duties, any
ambiguities in the workplace are eliminated. Each individual is held accountable for their own duties
and responsibilities. Performance Management empowers you to think about and clarify your role in
the organization. Setting clear goals and expectations helps with this. Employee performance plans
must provide for balanced, credible measures. Balance, so that in addition to measuring expected
results, the performance plans include appropriate measures, such as quality, quantity, timeliness,
and/or cost-effectiveness. To be credible, performance expectations must be: based on job analysis;
clear, specific, and understandable; reasonable and attainable; measurable, observable or verifiable,
and results oriented; communicated in a timely fashion; and foster continual improvement in
productivity.
Regular feedback facilitates better communication in the workplace. Performance Management helps
you to identify your strengths and weaknesses. It also allows for opportunities to hear and exchange
views and opinions away from the normal pressures of work. Most importantly it gives you a better
understanding of how your performance is being assessed and monitored. This builds employee
confidence and adds to your contribution in the workplace. Performance management can be a
motivational tool, fostering you to not only feel more satisfied, but to go beyond the expected. If
supervisors and employees aren’t talking throughout the year, the system won’t work, so we must
ensure we have a performance feedback process that facilitates a dialogue between supervisors,
managers, and employees throughout the year. Performance management is not something that’s
looked at only at the beginning and end of the rating cycle, with just one mid-cycle review – it’s a
continuous, ever changing process, reflecting and measuring the work employees are performing for
the agency.
Performance Management can help you to identify ways in which to improve your performance and
provides the opportunity to discuss career direction and prospects. It presents the opportunity to plan
for and set objectives to further develop your career. Performance Management will help you to gain
any additional training or mentoring which can act as a basis for developing future succession plans.
Outstanding efforts do not go unnoticed. Performance Management offers a variety of awards that
show gratitude for a job well done, such as time off and bonuses. The prospect of a better than Fully
Successful Performance Appraisal gives you the incentive to perform well and may open the door to
career advancements in the future.
Performance management is about increasing performance. As you know, we have been steadily
improving our performance management system for several years now, but there is more to be done.
Successful use of our performance management system will enable us to improve our program
delivery, increase our employee engagement and productivity, and make us better stewards of the
taxpayer’s dollars - things that should be important to all of us.
Mentoring is a process in which an experienced individual helps another person develop his or her
goals and skills through a series of time-limited, confidential, one-on-one conversations and other
learning activities.
A Mentor is an individual with expertise who can help develop the career of a mentee. The mentor
guides, trains, advises, and promotes the career development of the mentee.
Career
Psychosocial
Career Functions: Help the mentee learn the ropes and prepare for career advancement.
Coaching
Challenging assignments
Exposure and visibility
Protection
Psychosocial Functions: Help the mentee develop a sense of competence and clarity of identity.
Role-Modeling
Acceptance and confirmation
Counseling
Friendship
There are many kinds of mentoring relationships, ranging from informal to formal.
An informal mentoring relationship usually occurs in a spontaneous format. (Think of times you
have been helped by someone more experienced than you without explicitly asking to be
mentored.) Informal mentoring may also occur within the context of other relationships such as a
supervisory relationship or even peer relationships.
A facilitated mentoring relationship has been defined as a structure and series of processes
designed to create effective mentoring relationships; guide the desired behaviour change for
those involved; and evaluate the results for the protégés, the mentors and the organization.”
These mentoring relationships occur within a structured and defined framework and involve a
third party. Often these programs have a specific goal such as helping participants develop their
careers.
BENEFITS
MENTEE/PROTÉGÉ MENTOR ORGANISATION
Career advancement Personal fulfilment Development of managers
Personal support Assistance on projects Increased commitment to the organisation
Learning and development Financial Rewards Cost Effectiveness
Increased Confidence Increased Confidence Improved Organisational
Assistance and feedback Revitalised interest in work Communication
DRAWBACKS
CHARACTERISTICS OF MENTOR
All successful business people do not necessarily make effective mentors; certain individuals are more
effective in the role of developing others. Whether or not an individual is suited to the role of mentor
may depend on his or her own stage of development and experience. For example, a fairly successful
individual may have had a specific, or limited, background and may not have enough general
experience to offer. Prior to entering into a mentoring relationship, the protégé should assume the
responsibility of assessing the mentor's potential effectiveness.
A DESIRE TO HELP
Individuals who have had positive formal or informal experiences with a mentor tend to be good
mentors themselves.
Experienced people who have a good reputation for helping others develop their skills.
TIME & ENERGY
People who have the time and mental energy to devote to the relationship.
UP-TO-DATE KNOWLEDGE
Individuals who have maintained current, up-to-date technological knowledge and/or skills.
LEARNING ATTITUDE
Individuals who are still willing and able to learn and who see the potential benefits of a mentoring
relationship.
Individuals who have demonstrated effective coaching, counselling, facilitating and networking skills.
MENTORING PROCESS
Formal mentoring relationship will likely reflect four developmental stages with each stage forming an
inherent part of the next:
There is no strict formula for determining the length of each stage. In a year-long relationship, for
example, Stages I and II typically unfold during the first three to four months of the relationship.
Typically, the relationship winds down in months 11 and 12. Options for continuing the relationship in
a less formal way are addressed in Stage IV.
During this phase, you will get to know each other and begin to establish trust.
During your first meeting (ideally face-to-face), discuss your backgrounds, experiences,
interests, and expectations. You will also make agreements about confidentiality and the
frequency of contact.
During this first stage, it is important to establish a schedule for communicating regularly,
whether in-person, by phone, or e-mail.
There are a number of questions you may want to ask your protégé during your second meeting:
Tell me a little more about yourself, your skills, your organization or community, the political
environment, some key challenges you are facing, etc. (Begin by reflecting back a few of the
key experiences and interests he or she expressed during your first meeting.)
How have you benefited from other mentoring relationships?
What are some of your preliminary goals for our mentoring relationship?
During Stage II, you will exchange more information and set goals. Your relationship and trust will
deepen. As the mentoring relationship unfolds, be attentive to practicing active listening and
consistently expressing encouragement.
Goals are helpful because they help the protégé see beyond the day-to-day demands of his or her
position and help him or her gain clarity on how to get the most out of the mentoring relationship.
Encourage your protégé to discuss his or her goals with you.
Coach your protégé to refer back to his or her goals periodically as a way of refocusing on goals and
measuring progress. Referring to the goals regularly is also a good way for you to know if you are
helping him or her achieve them.
This is a good point in the journey to reflect on progress toward goals and on the relationship itself.
Consider discussing the following:
• What are the benefits of the relationship up to this point? How am I helping you (protégé) achieve
your goals?
• What changes do you see in yourself and in the way, you approach your work as a result of the
mentoring relationship?
• What kinds of adjustments or changes, if any, are needed in your goals or in our relationship?
This is also the stage during which energy in the relationship can wane! Sometimes, the protégé will
feel concerned that he or she is burdening you. Other responsibilities will often compete with his or
her commitment to the mentoring relationship. If you haven’t heard from your protégé, check in with
him or her. Take the lead if necessary. Also take stock of your own time and energy. Is the partnership
working well for you? Do you need to make some adjustments?
This is a highly rewarding phase of the relationship, but challenges may arise. Here are some examples
of challenges other mentors and protégés have faced and resolved.
• Time and energy. The most common challenge by far is finding sufficient time to do all you want to
do in the partnership. Despite good intentions, other priorities interfere for both of you.
Solution: Think small rather than large, especially in the beginning. Avoid promising more time than
you can deliver. Check with your protégé to be certain you are both comfortable with the time you are
spending and with the learning that is occurring.
• Building trust quickly. With only a few hours of contact each month, it is not easy to build the kind
of trust you both would like.
Solution: Other mentors have successfully used several strategies, such as the following: Listen very
carefully, and remember what your protégé has said in the past. Demonstrate your credibility. Keep
your promises and commitments -- if any need to be changed, let your protégé know immediately and
reschedule or renegotiate them. Admit some errors made and lessons learned. Avoid talking
negatively about others. Above all, keep the confidences your protégé shares with you.
• Not being the “expert” on all your protégé’s needs. Many mentors find it difficult when they do not
have all the answers.
Solution: Explain your role as “learning facilitator” early in your relationship. Tell your protégé that
you will not have all the answers, and you are looking forward to learning together as well as seeking
help from others who are more expert on different topics.
• Being sensitive to differences. Particularly in the beginning, it is tempting to assume that both of
you are the same. In fact, you will share experiences. Explore and learn from your differences as well.
Solution: In addition to discovering all your similarities, work carefully to identify the differences
between you and your protégé. For example, how do the specifics of his or her position differ from the
role(s) you’ve played? What is occurring now for him or her that you did not face? If you are of
different generations/ages, genders, races, cultural groups, or professional backgrounds, what
different experiences have you both had? Assume a learning mode, and invite discussion about all of
these topics. As Stephen Covey reminds us in Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, “Seek first to
understand.”
Stage IV: Ending the Formal Mentoring Relationship and Planning for the Future
During this stage, planning for the protégé’s continued success is balanced with bringing the formal
mentoring relationship to a close. Work with your protégé to define the types of support he or she
may need in the future. You may want to connect him or her with additional colleagues who can
provide benefits other than those provided by you. This is also a good time to explore your protégé’s
own interest in one day mentoring someone.
Adjournment brings closure to the journey. Your final discussion should be dedicated to the following:
GROUP MENTORING
1-on-1Mentoring
Group Mentoring
Support comes not only from the Mentoring Group Leader (MGL) but from peers within the
group
Provides for greater exposure to multiple levels of expertise and knowledge as each
participant brings their own competencies to the group that can be shared
Diversity within the group brings a diversity of perspective to issues as well as to a greater
understanding and awareness of diversity in general as it relates to ethnicity, sex, etc.
Provides for a greater number of individuals to benefit from mentoring as opposed to the
limitations of a 1-on-1 mentoring program
Group projects linked to group mentoring enhance the learning of participants and develop an
understanding of how teams operate.
Requires less commitment of resources than formal 1-on-1 mentoring programs
Each member has different needs that must be balanced against the overall group needs
Does not offer the “personal” relationship that is the hallmark of a 1-on-1 mentoring
relationship
Scheduling a large number of individuals to meet regularly can be a challenge
The element of confidentiality and safety may not be achieved to the level possible in a 1-on-1
relationship thus limiting the extent a member takes risks and learns
Competition within a group can disrupt the success of a mentoring group
Mentors need to understand and be comfortable with group dynamics and processes
Note: Make sure team mentors are given the necessary tools and training to make their relationships
successful.
Peer mentoring
Again, the name says it all. There’s a lot that can be learned from our fellow mentees; allowing
mentees to, in turn, mentor their peers are a powerful way to reinforce mentoring practices and instil
leadership qualities beyond traditional mentoring settings.
Note: Goal-setting and self-direction are key. It also helps if peer mentors have similar roles,
experiences and interests.
In order to ensure that your team are working to the Operational Plan you need to monitor
performance and the use of resources.
Environmental changes
Resource usage
Environmental Changes
As your environment changes you may need to alter your Operational Plan. Both external and
internal influences may be the cause of change. For example, an increase in customer calls (an
external change) may affect your plan. A budget cut (internal change) may also affect your
plan.
When changes occur, you may need to alter your plan to deal effectively with the change.
Resource Usage
How resources are used may affect your team's performance. For example, call operators may
spend too long on each call (human resource usage) or team members may be using more
stationary items than is necessary to achieve satisfactory levels of performance (physical
resource usage).
The
Monitoring To know when to alter your plans or when to improve the use of resources
Process: you need to monitor your results against the performance indicators set in
your original plan.
It is important to ensure that you keep a note of the changes as they occur
in your Operational Plan. This information can then be used to help you
improve your planning process.
S.A.M.I.E.Model
: The SAMIE model is a simple tool which can be used to monitor and
evaluate your operational performance.
Select
Analyse
Measure
Improve
Evaluate
When should
monitoring There are three distinct times when monitoring can occur:
occur?
Before an event
During an event
After an event
Before an event
During an event
After an event
Most monitoring occurs after an event has occurred. Even though problems
may not have been avoided or opportunities have been lost it is important
that monitoring after the event occurs as analysis can provide valuable
information for future plans.
What should
be The monitoring processes you establish can be used to monitor the use of:
monitored?
Employee's time
Physical resources
Improving
Resource The monitoring process should highlight whether resources are being used
Usage: efficiently. If resources are not being used efficiently you should:
Concept-Coaching
Mentoring relates primarily to the identification and nurturing of potential for the whole person. It can
be a long-term relationship, where the goals may change but are always set by the learner. The learner
owns both the goals and the process. Feedback comes from within the mentee – the mentor helps them
to develop insight and understanding through intrinsic observation, that is, becoming more aware of
their own experiences.
Coaching relates primarily to performance improvement (often short-term) in a specific skills area. The
goals, or at least the intermediate or sub-goals, are typically set with or at the suggestion of the coach.
While the learner has primary ownership of the goal, the coach has primary ownership of the process.
In most cases, coaching involves direct extrinsic feedback (i.e. the coach reports to the coaches what he
or she has observed.
Objectives
It is important to understand that individuals are unique and organizations differ. Therefore, both
individual and organizational goals vary widely. Common objectives are required in order to:
Mentoring - Mentoring is an indefinite, relationship-based activity with several specific but wide-
ranging goals. It does not have to be a formal process. The mentor is a facilitator who works with either
an individual or a group of people over an extended time period. The agenda is open and continues to
evolve over the longer term. Mentoring seeks to build wisdom – the ability to apply skills, knowledge
and experience to new situations and processes.
Coaching - The focus is on meeting very specific objectives within a set period of time. Coaching is
mainly concerned with performance and the development of certain skills. It usually takes place on a
one-to-one basis and has a very specific purpose. There is usually a planned programme with a much
shorter timeframe than in mentoring, so the learning goals are usually determined in advance.
Mentoring and coaching can be ‘standalone’ activities, but they can also be used to complement each
other.
Neither mentoring nor coaching is about teaching, instruction or telling somebody what to do. The role
of mentors and coaches is to ask their protégé the right questions to promote greater self-awareness and
more informed decision making. The role of mentors and coaches is not to solve problems, but to
question how the best solutions might be found.
The mentoring or coaching process evolves over time. The aims are not inflexible, but may change as
the protégé reaches the set goals and learns new behaviour. The process continues until everybody is
satisfied that the objectives have been achieved.
The skills of mentor and coach overlap to some extent. Both mentors and coaches are ‘critical friends’
although they might use different methods. A coach is more likely to use direct feedback, while a
mentor relies more heavily on the questioning process. A coach is a specialist who works with the
protégé on specific goals and objectives – the professional equivalent of a fitness trainer. A mentor is
likely to have followed a similar career to the one their protégé is starting, and will pass on their
expertise.
• senior managers who are unlikely to benefit from conventional training courses
• managers who need the space to develop or improve new or existing skills
• those on a ‘fast track’ career programme
• staff who need to focus more on their career paths
• managers who have reached a career plateau and want to progress, but do not know how to
• anybody developing a new career
• staff or managers who want to change career direction
• employees returning to work after a career break
• staff wanting to improve their skills and abilities
• individuals who respond better to alternative learning methods
• mentors and coaches themselves
•staff or managers working through difficult issues.
Mentoring can:
• increase individual and team commitment to an organisation and its goals
• help improve communication within the organisation
• help to change organisational culture for the better
• allow individuals to gain a greater insight into the organisation’s workings
• give individuals the chance to meet different people within the organisation, and to network
• improve levels of professional success.
Mentoring cannot:
• succeed unless clear objectives are agreed in advance
• succeed unless there is an agreed plan of action
• act as a replacement for conventional training.
Coaching can:
• provide individuals and teams with opportunities for gaining new skills, and personal development
• offer learning opportunities geared to individual needs
• encourage a positive attitude to learning
• provide flexibility in the learning process
• allow protégés to select what and how they learn.
Coaching cannot:
• effect change unless clear, measurable goals are set in advance
• benefit the protégé unless there is support from senior managers
• succeed unless both coach and protégé are fully committed to the coaching programme.
The GROW (goals, reality, options, wrap up) model provides structure for coaching discussions with
more experienced learners. For less experienced learners, the process can be time consuming and often
too complex. The model places the onus for development on the learner, as the coach adopts a less
directive approach.
Establish goals
Explore reality
Generate options
Agree action, wrap up
GROW devised by Sir John Whitmore and described in his book, Coaching for Performance: growing
people, performance and purpose.
During the first part of their meeting, the coach and protégé focus on determining exactly what they
want to achieve. This stage is about establishing expectations and goals.
At least 50% of the meeting should be spent on the reality stage. Good questioning and listening skills
will enable the coach to define the issues that need to be addressed.
Once the underlying issues are identified, the coach should continue to ask questions so that the protégé
can identify the available options.
In the ’wrap up’ stage, the actions should be determined. This final stage is sometimes described as
‘confirm the will to act’. It is about agreeing what specific actions the protégé is going to take away
from the meeting.
An effectively managed team is like a well-oiled machine: when employees are on the same page and
determined to meet the same goals, a company improves its chances of building customer loyalty, out-
shining the competition, and boosting the bottom line. However, like a car with misfiring gaskets, a
company with employees who lack proper leadership tends to falter when it comes to achieving
objectives of any kind.
Building your repertoire of resources with these 10 employee-coaching tools will help you to be the
most effective manager possible.
In an effort to ensure you’re using all of your resources to best manage your team, consider developing
a “toolkit” for employee coaching. Not only will this act as a quick, go-to reference in times of need, it
will also be a valuable asset you can continue to build as you gain additional experience in leadership
and management.
COUNSELING
Counselling literally means to counsel/advice someone regarding some factors affecting the counselee's
life. But it is very wrong to confine the term "Counselling" to the word "Advice" since counselling is
not advising. but helping the counselled person(s) to find his or her own way out of one's own problem.
The main objective of Counselling is to help the employee attain a better mental, emotional and
physical health. A counsellor is the one who can help a person realize a better tomorrow by the
attainment of self- confidence, self-development, patience and self-growth. The objectives of
counselling are achieved through the counselling functions.
Counselling is a communication between the counsellor and the counselled. It's an exchange of
ideas between the two.
Counselling is a process and not an advice-giving procedure. It is a long-term process 'and takes
some time for the person(s) involved to understand the problem and learn how to cope with it.
Counselling is about clarifying and helping the counselled to handle him or her in the time of
crisis and be able to meet the demands of life.
Both professional and non-professional counsellors can provide counselling.
Counselling is usually private and confidential so that the employee is free to' speak out without
any fear of retribution i.e. penalty from the employers.
Counselling is beneficial to the organisation as it helps to solve problems relating to both job
and personal life of the employees; thus, helping them perform better on the job and also giving
a more humane look to the organisation.
The counselling functions are the activities that can be done by counselling. The functions are:
1. Advice:
Advice giving is not desired for counselling, as it’s a process of self- growth which advising would
hamper. But many a time's counsellors do have to advice so as to show/ guide the counselled towards a
path of action.
2. Reassurance:
Counselling has to provide reassurance to the employee that he or she is progressing well and moving
towards achieving the desired goal. Reassurance here can be meant as encouragement also. This is
mostly in the case of the mid-career managers where counsellor can only reassure that everything will
work out Employees' Counselling fine and also encourage him or her to work as the desired goal is
within reach.
3. Communication:
Counselling is mostly about proper communication. A proper communication is required to pass the
employee problems to the management and also to air the views of the management to the employees.
Communication skills such as listening, providing feedback and so on are required for an effective
counselling session.
The purpose of counseling is to develop clients who are better able to achieve the purpose for which the
counseling session started initially. During the assessment, the counsellor should review the plan of
action with the client to determine if the desired results were achieved. The counsellor and the client
should determine the date for this assessment during the initial counseling session. The assessment of
the plan of action provides useful information for future follow up counseling sessions. There is a
natural progression that takes place within the context of the helping relationship. This process enables
the counsellor and the client to build a relationship, assess the situation, set goals and come up with a
plan to bring about the desired results. This progression is known as the counseling process.
Phase 2: Make an Informed Assessment
An informed assessment happens when both the counsellor and the client gather information in order to
figure out what “really” is going on, so that the counsellor can assess what needs to happen next in
order to change the situation for the better or build up the client’s coping skills to better deal with a
problematic situation. The first step in making an assessment is to find out if change is necessary, and if
it is what needs to happen for change to take place. If the counsellor has decided that change is
necessary, then the next step is to figure out what needs to change. Is it a behaviour? An attitude? A
situation?
A good assessment can provide an opportunity for a client to see how his/her behaviour or attitude
might be contributing to an undesirable or unhealthy situation. Assessment is an ongoing process. The
counsellor needs to regularly check in with the client to see how things are going. Reassessments
enable the counsellor to ensure that the counsellor and the client are on the right track.
The counsellor gathers information in a number of ways: talking with the client, observing the client’s
behaviour and interactions, discussions with other people who are involved in the client’s life, and
reading any documented information on the client. The counsellor should keep in mind that when
utilising client’s information given by someone else, he must make sure that there is no bias or
assumptions.
Why is it important to establish “mutually agreed” upon goals and objectives? Because if a client is in
agreement with the goals then he/she is more likely to follow through on them. When a client is
actively involved in the goal setting process and is in agreement with the goals, then he/she is more
inclined to take ownership of the goals, which have to be accomplished.
The counsellor must think of goals as the end result that he is trying to achieve. While goals are broad
statements that identify what the counsellor wants to accomplish overall, objectives are the measurable
steps that the counsellor takes to achieve the goals. For example, if the counsellor has a goal that states
that the client will be better able to manage her anger, one of the objectives of the counsellor might be,
that the client will recognize emotional triggers that lead to angry outbursts and use positive, self-talk to
calm herself down. Thus, the objectives of the counsellor should always be concrete and measurable.
They should also be derived from the overall goal.
The implementation plan is a plan that the counsellor and the client work on together. It is designed to
prevent, intervene, or address unhealthy behaviors and practices. The implementation plan identifies
who will perform the activities, where the activities will occur, how frequently they will occur, how
they will be carried out and when they will be carried out. Implementation activities are designed to
help clients rethink risky behavior, work through problematic issues, address unhealthy lifestyle
practices, learn new skills and build strengths. Implementation activities can include: counseling, crisis
intervention, training and education, supportive services, concrete services and constructive use of free
time.
As the counsellor can understand, each stage of the counseling process builds upon the former. As the
counsellor moves through each stage, he will come to realize that it takes patience and practice to
counsel the client effectively, but if the counsellor is committed to the goal, he will be able to achieve
and implement successfully. The counsellor may not feel completely confident in their ability as a
counselor, but as he expands his knowledge base, he would gain more experience and strengthen his
helping skills, and thus he will become a more effective counselor.
The process of Performance Management is comprised of three important parts (1) Planning
Performance and Development; (2) Monitoring Performance and Development and (3) Annual Stock
Taking. These occur in a specified sequence. Planning is made at the beginning of the year while
monitoring and mentoring is continued throughout the year as the plans are executed. Stocktaking
takes place at the end of the year. Each one of these phases requires certain concrete actions by the
managers and the managee. Both these parties (manager and managee) provide appropriate inputs by
keeping the whole process in perspective.
The whole process of the performance management can be approached in a different mode. Planning,
review and stock taking can happen throughout the year, more specifically at the time of periodic
review during the monitoring and mentoring phase. As such, these three phases are dynamic and a
continuously interact with one-another.
The plans are periodically reviewed and feasibility is tested the context of changing events and
influences that could not be adequately forcing. Since the process involves in both the managers and
the managees it has a participatory character.
Stock taking both periodical and annual attempts to continuously assess the extent of work as well as
learning opportunity that have been optimally avail by the managee. Inputs to stocktaking are provided
by performance plans and monitoring and mentoring records. Stock taking also provides several inputs
to future performance plan. Review in task assignments, task systems and tools are also possible
through stocktaking. An assessment of managee‘s development needs of future tasks and
responsibilities is done more realistically to stocktaking.
There are certain special features that will make PM more effective and qualitative in achievement of
organizational goals. These include –
2. Flexible: The Performance management process should be flexible and should ensure the manager
and managee acting together. However, each one of these parties should have sufficient
maneuverability to design their own process within the overall framework for performance
management.
3. Futuristic: Performance management should be futuristic. All the three parts of performance
management are oriented towards the future planning and improvement. Evaluation system gives
necessary inputs for future actions.
5. Controlling: PM aims at measuring managee‘s actual performance against planned performance i.e.,
targets, standards or indicators.
6. Behavioural in Content: PM is completely development nature and concerns itself vigorously with
managee‘s psychological behavioural aspects and personality traits, which are critical inputs to the
performance process. PM specify these personal attributes and behaviour of each managee and
meticulously assess the extent of their contribution to managee level of performance. This paves the
way to identify managee‘s future development needs; and
7. Win-Win Philosophy: PfM provides the frame work in which manager must support their managees
to succeed and to win.
Three basic principles are used by leaders to transform their organizations into high commitment
models of management. These include –
1. Building Trust: Building trust in people is vital and this could be possible by treating people with
respect and dignity. Sharing information with everyone and treating them, as human beings will create
a sense of trustworthiness among members of the organization.
2. Encouraging Change: Leaders can encourage change among employees and the managee by
exposing themselves and their colleagues through alternative management models.
3. Measuring what is important: Leaders need to realize that ‗what gets measured‘ gets measured‘.
Robert Kaplan and David Norton‘s balanced scorecard approach, in which financial measures are
weighed against measures of customer satisfaction and attention, employee attitudes and retention, new
product and business development, or readiness for change. Details about what has happened is
important. But much more important is the organization‘s current condition in terms what enables or
hinders its performance.
Currently knowledge and capability are the real key to success. This rest in people. So, paying serious
attention to people‘s issues becomes evermore important. Leaders ought to build systems at this
perspective.
Designing a performance appraisal system is not a linear process. Like the appraisal process itself, the
design process is highly interactive. It is like a spiral with recurring needs and issues. Because of this,
the description of the actions necessary to design an appraisal system and the actions necessary to
implement the system are presented as recurring events rather than as steps. Figure 1 places the events
before you in a circular format. The lines that connect all the points on the circle suggest that each
event may reflect backward or forward to another point on the circle. Findings from the job analysis
have an impact on writing the job descriptions and establishing job standards, but certain findings may
warrant reconsideration of the tie between the mission of the organization and the performance
appraisal system or even the composition of a design team. The descriptions that follow discuss each of
these recurring events in detail and illustrate their interactive nature.
Deciding to Design a System
Before launching a major design or redesign effort, you must consider whether or not the effort is
worth it. Is this something that you or your supervisor read about recently and decided maybe it was
time you looked into it? This motivation is fine, but it is probably not sufficient to carry a design team
through a lengthy planning process. Several questions need to be considered: Is there an organizational
commitment to the design effort? Does this effort have the support of the administration and the staff?
What problems or issues prompt the need to redesign the system? How much can be done within
specified time limits and within allowable resources? Are you and the staff willing to spend the
necessary time on the redesign effort?
Four groups of people can serve as the nucleus of a design team: external consultants, internal
specialists, middle managers, and other staff. External consultants may include performance appraisal
experts from the business and management faculty on campus, private consultants from outside the
university, or persons from other university student affairs staffs who have recently undergone a similar
design effort. You may especially want to consider involving an external consultant if you are starting
completely from scratch. The consultant can be someone who stimulates the staff to consider the
relevant issues and who defines the characteristics of a good appraisal system. External assessment
experts can provide valuable assistance in making the process psychometrically sound. Management
consultants might provide guidance on how to discern administrator and staff concerns.
Setting Goals
An early task for the design team is to determine the specific goals and boundaries of their task. Are
they going to carry through on all phases of the process? Are they going to delegate parts of the design
process to other individuals or teams? Perhaps the team might serve as the coordinators while others
are involved in conducting job analyses, writing job descriptions, or designing rating scales. The team
might form subcommittees to work on the individual tasks. Choosing among these different strategies
will depend on the composition of the team, the availability of resources, and the time lines.
Participation as a member of a design team can become a staff development activity; members will
learn more about their unit, other units, and the entire student affairs office.
Conducting a job analysis can be a highly formal, technical process using sophisticated quantitative or
qualitative procedures. It can also be relatively informal. The more complex the position is and the
higher the level of the position, the more difficult it is to characterize the job in observable and
measurable terms. Enumerating the responsibilities of a residence hall assistant is easier than describing
the duties of the director of housing, which, in turn, is easier than writing a description of the role and
activities of the vice-president for student affairs.
Setting Standards
A standard is a quality index that describes performances as acceptable or exceptional with possible
gradations in between. Should the standard be what is minimally acceptable] or should it be higher?
Several good reasons exist for having standards describe acceptable behavior. Standards that typify
acceptable behavior rather than exceptional behaviour have the potential, if appropriately used, to
increase staff morale and provide more flexibility in an appraisal system. Like the job description,
standards should focus on job behaviour and job expectations rather than on personal characteristics,
and they should be communicated to and agreed on by the staff. Good standards also must: (1) be
achievable, (2) be understandable, (3) be specific and as measurable as possible, (4) be written, (5) be
flexible, (6) specify a schedule and time limits, and (7) indicate the quality and quantity of effort
expected (Kirkpatrick, 1982).
Obtaining Top-Level Support
Whatever form the appraisal system takes and whatever administrative unit uses it, the system must
have the support of top management. Lack of support by chief executive officers is one of the most
frequently cited reasons for failure of performance appraisal systems (DeVries, Morrison, Shullman,
and Gerlach, 1981). Even if the administrative location of the system is closer to the directors’ level
than to that of the chief student affairs officer, there are several ways in which the chief student affairs
officer can provide support. Only the chief student affairs officer, for example, can ensure that effective
appraisal practices are, in turn, a significant criterion in the appraisal of middle managers (directors or
department and agency heads). In addition, how the chief student affairs officer evaluates his or her
immediate line staff-the directors-can be a model for the directors themselves. How can you expect
directors to spend time and energy on performance appraisal if their own performance is evaluated in a
cavalier or impromptu fashion?
Obtaining Staff Support
Probably more than any other design task, this is clearly not an event but an ongoing process. Staff
involvement has been highlighted as essential through each phase of the design process. But it does not
end with completion of the design; it must be carried forward into the implementation phase.
Ultimately, staff support will be contingent on how well the system is implemented.
APPRAISAL METHODS
MBO (management by objectives) methods of performance appraisal are results-oriented. That is, they
seek to measure employee performance by examining the extent to which predetermined work
objectives have been met. Usually the objectives are established jointly by the supervisor and
subordinate. An example of an objective for a sales manager might be: Increase the gross monthly sales
volume to $250,000 by 30 June. Once an objective is agreed, the employee is usually expected to self-
audit; that is, to identify the skills needed to achieve the objective. Typically, they do not rely on others
to locate and specify their strengths and weaknesses. They are expected to monitor their own
development and progress.
Advantages
The MBO approach overcomes some of the problems that arise as a result of assuming that the
employee traits needed for job success can be reliably identified and measured.
The guiding principle of the MBO approach is that direct results can be observed, whereas the traits
and attributes of employees (which may or may not contribute to performance) must be guessed at or
inferred.
The MBO method recognizes the fact that it is difficult to neatly dissect all the complex and varied
elements that go to make up employee performance.
MBO advocates claim that the performance of employees cannot be broken up into so many constituent
parts - as one might take apart an engine to study it. But put all the parts together and the performance
may be directly observed and measured.
Disadvantages
MBO methods of performance appraisal can give employees a satisfying sense of autonomy and
achievement. But on the downside, they can lead to unrealistic expectations about what can and cannot
be reasonably accomplished.
Supervisors and subordinates must have very good "reality checking" skills to use MBO appraisal
methods. They will need these skills during the initial stage of objective setting, and for the purposes of
self-auditing and self-monitoring.
Unfortunately, research studies have shown repeatedly that human beings tend to lack the skills needed
to do their own "reality checking". Nor are these skills easily conveyed by training. Reality itself is an
intensely personal experience, prone to all forms of perceptual bias.
One of the strengths of the MBO method is the clarity of purpose that flows from a set of well-
articulated objectives. But this can be a source of weakness also. It has become very apparent that the
modern organization must be flexible to survive. Objectives, by their very nature, tend to impose a
certain rigidity.
Of course, the obvious answer is to make the objectives more fluid and yielding. But the penalty for
fluidity is loss of clarity. Variable objectives may cause employee confusion. It is also possible that
fluid objectives may be distorted to disguise or justify failures in performance.
ASSESSMENT CENTRE
The assessment center is the central location where the managers come and perform the job exercises.
Here the assessee is requested to participate in in-basket exercises, role playing, discussions, computer
simulations, etc. Where they are evaluated in term of their persuasive ability, communication skills,
confidence, sensitivity to the feelings of others, mental alertness, administrative ability, etc.
This entire exercise is done under the trainer who observes the employee behavior and then discusses it
with the rater who finally evaluates the employee’s performance.
An assessment center typically involves the use of methods like social/informal events, tests and
exercises, assignments being given to a group of employees to assess their competencies to take higher
responsibilities in the future. Generally, employees are given an assignment similar to the job they
would be expected to perform if promoted. The trained evaluators observe and evaluate employees as
they perform the assigned jobs and are evaluated on job related characteristics.
The major competencies that are judged in assessment centers are interpersonal skills, intellectual
capability, planning and organizing capabilities, motivation, career orientation etc. assessment centers
are also an effective way to determine the training and development needs of the targeted employees.
Nearly 30% companies seek assessment center services while moving an employee from executive
position to managerial position. 20% companies said they use the center's services when seeking a
position on senior management level. As per the TJinsite, the premium research website promoted by
TimesJobs.com survey, more than 80% of the surveyed employers predict an increased use of
assessment centres in near future because of their expertise and unbiased in assessing an individual fit
and biggest limitation comes from the lack of skilled assessors to perform the assessment task
effectively.
It is a feedback method wherein the details of an employee’s performance are gathered from other
stakeholders such as superiors, peers, team members and self. In this method, the employee is asked
about himself, i.e. what he feels about his performance, and then accordingly he can realize his
strengths and weaknesses. Also, the peers or team members are asked about assessee’s performance
through which the employee knows about what others feel about him and can overcome his disbeliefs if
any. Thus, this method is used to have a detailed evaluation of an employee from all the perspectives.
720-Degree Feedback: This is another feedback method, wherein the assessment is done not only by
the stakeholders within the company but also from the groups outside the organization. These external
groups who assesses the employee’s performance are customers, investors, suppliers and other
financial institutions. It is one of the most crucial modern methods of performance appraisal because
this is the only group that determines the success of the organization as a whole.
Kaplan and Norton stated in their first article that in order to have an integrated organization
performance assessment, the performance should be noticed from four aspects; These four perspectives
answer to four key questions:
How should we be in customer view?
In which internal processes we should transcend?
Can we stand in continuous improvement and value creativity?
How should we be in our shareholders’ view?
The first generation of BSC consists of above perspectives in addition to goal and metric in each
perspective. These four perspectives in their first generation are explaining as follows:
Customer perspective: The mission statement of most companies focuses on customers. “Change into
the best company in creating value for customers”. BSC causes that managers translate their mission
statement in four necessaries for customers in four categories: time, quality, performance and service
delivery, and price. Firms in order to apply BSC should express their goals based on time, quality,
performance and service deliver and then translate them into specific metrics. Managers need to focus
on those key internal operations which make them capable in order to meet customers’ needs.
Companies identify their internal processes metrics of their BSC usually after identifying financial and
customer perspectives goals and metrics. Internal processes metrics should be selected based on the
business processes which have the most effect on customer satisfaction. Companies should decide in
which processes they want to be at top and define each metric related to these items.
Learning and growths perspective: After the metrics and goals related to internal processes and
customer perspectives identified, it is possible to understand that there is a gap between current
organizational infrastructures and optimized level in order to achieve the goals. Metrics based on
customer and internal processes are important to identify very important parameters for organization
competitive success. However, universal close competition makes companies consider a continuous
improvement in their products and processes and capable enough to identify new products. The
company capability in innovation, improvement, and learning directly affects the company value. In
other words, companies just by their capabilities in providing new products, creating value for their
customers and continuous improvement of operational efficiency can enter new markets and increase
their profit and income.
Financial perspective: Metrics of financial perspective identify that whether the strategy and its
execution plays a role in company profitability improvement or not. Financial goals are usually being
defined in relation with profitability, growth and shareholders’ value. Companies should define their
financial perspective goals in a framework of sustainability, success, and economic boom. Boom is
measuring by cash flow, success by seasonal sell growth, sections operational income, and economic
boom by market share and ROI improvements. Kaplan and Norton (1992 and 1993) didn’t directly
point to cause-and- effect relationship and just mentioned the relationship among four BSC
perspectives.
POTENTIAL APPRAISAL
The potential appraisal refers to the appraisal i.e. identification of the hidden talents and skills of a
person. The person might or might not be aware of them. Potential appraisal is a future – oriented
appraisal whose main objective is to identify and evaluate the potential of the employees to assume
higher positions and responsibilities in the organizational hierarchy. Many organisations consider and
use potential appraisal as a part of the performance appraisal processes.
1. Self – appraisals
2. Peer appraisals
3. Superior appraisals
4. MBO
5. Psychological and psychometric tests
6. Management games like role playing
7. Leadership exercises etc.
Potential appraisal helps to identify what can happen in future so that it can be guided and directed
towards the achievement of individual and organizational growth and goals. Therefore, potential should
be included as a part of the Performance appraisal in organisations.
Role Description: A good potential appraisal system would be based on clarity of roles and functions
associated with the different roles in an organisation. This requires extensive job descriptions to be
made available for each job. These job descriptions should spell out the various functions involved in
performing the job.
Qualities Required: Besides job descriptions, it is necessary to have a detailed list of qualities required
to perform each of these functions. These qualities may be broadly divided into four categories -
(1) technical knowledge and skills, (2) managerial capabilities and qualities, (3) behavioural
capabilities, and (4) conceptual capabilities.
Indicators of Qualities: A good potential appraisal system besides listing down the functions and
qualities would also have various mechanisms for judging these qualities in a given individual. Some of
the mechanisms for judging these qualities are - (a) rating by others, (b) psychological tests,
(c) simulation games and exercises, (d) performance appraisal records.
Organising the System: Once the functions, the qualities required to perform these functions,
indicators of these qualities, and mechanisms for generating these indicators are clear, the organisation
is in a sound position to establish and operate the potential appraisal system. Such establishment
requires clarity in organisational policies and systematisation of its efforts.
Feedback: If the organisation believes in the development of human resources it should attempt to
generate a climate of openness. Such a climate is required for helping the employees to understand their
strengths and weaknesses and to create opportunities for development. A good potential appraisal
system should provide an opportunity for every employee to know the results of assessment. He should
be helped to understand the qualities actually required for performing the role for which he thinks he
has the potential, the mechanisms used by the organisation to appraise his potential, and the results of
such an appraisal.
A good potential appraisal system provides opportunities continuously for the employee to know his
strengths and weaknesses. These are done through periodic counseling and guidance sessions by either
the personnel department or the managers concerned. This should enable the employee to develop
realistic self-perceptions and plan his own career and development.
Before talking about rewards and benefits given to the employees of the organization, we have to know
about the importance of motivation at the workplace. Motivation of employees is the major issue which
helps the organization to grow, every manager in the organization mainly focuses on employee
motivation with the help of various rewarding techniques including monetary and non- monetary
rewards at various levels of the organization.
MONETARY REWARDS
Monetary rewards are the incentives given to the employees of the organization in the form of money.
Some employees are motivated only if there is money element involved. The monetary incentives
are mostly given based on the performance of an employee. The monetary incentives given to the
employee are direct benefits to the employee and is considered as an exposure to the employer.
Some of the monetary benefits, which are given by the organization are
⦿ Profit sharing,
⦿ Stock options,
⦿ Bonuses,
⦿ Commissions,
⦿ Merit pay, etc.
NON-MONETARY REWARDS
Non-Monetary rewards are the benefits given to the employees of the organization to increase the
employee job performance, employee loyalty towards the organization, employee morale, etc. The
Non-Monetary rewards as the name suggests does not involve direct money. i.e., the employee doesn’t
get any money but he gets various benefits like,
⦿ Promotions,
⦿ Food coupons,
⦿ Company uniforms,
⦿ Flexible timings,
⦿ Healthcare Benefits,
⦿ Life insurance policy, etc.
Many studies have been conducted and found out that, the benefits which are in non-monetary form
derives more benefits to the organization because it involves some form of emotional bondage with the
employees which increase employee loyalty, which automatically increases job performance.
CONCEPT
The need to achieve ongoing organizational innovation and sustainability requires a fundamentally
different approach to managing employees than the centralized, control-oriented approaches of the past.
Building a learning organization is a critical challenge for top managers since it depends on
establishing an organizational climate that allows the human capacity for innovation and creativity to
flourish.
Although many theorists have explored the concept of a learning organization, there is not yet a
consensus on the definition of a learning organization. Definition provided by Pedler et al. (1991: 2)
states that a learning organization is “an organization that facilitates the learning of all its members and
continuously transforms itself”. For more definitions see Appendix 1. Bottom line seems to be that a
learning organization is a proactive organization, which leverages the learning of all its members in
order to enhance collective capability to change.
It should be noted that most literature differentiates between a learning organization and organizational
learning. It is suggested (Symon, 2002) that the notion of a learning organization has been developed
from the concept of organizational learning (see Argyris and Schön, 1978). The idea of a learning
organization is mostly about a desirable goal or an ideal (see Figure 3) and organizational learning is
mostly about the management of relevant activities and processes by which organizations can be and
are changed (see Finger and Woolis, 1994). Accordingly, the difference is between the process and
content.
A learning organization is the term given to an organization which facilitates the learning of its
employees so that the organization can continuously transforms itself. Learning organization develops
as a result of the pressures which are being faced by the organizations these days for enabling them to
remain competitive in the present-day business environment. The learning organization concept was
coined through the work and research of Peter Senge and his colleagues. The learning organization
encourages to a more interconnected way of thinking. Such organization becomes more like a
community for which employees feel a commitment to. Employees work harder for the organization
since they are committed to it.
The concept of the learning organization is commonly hailed as panacea for organizational success in a
dynamic global economy. The concept of learning organization is increasingly relevant given the
increasing complexity and uncertainty of the organizational environment. In the words of Senge: “The
rate at which organizations learn may become the only sustainable source of competitive advantage”.
People have found the idea of a learning organization to be inspiring, yet difficult to implement. It
frequently involves deep change in the mind sets of employees as well as the culture of the organization
and the society. Such change does not occur overnight.
Peter Senge has defined the learning organization as the organization “in which you
cannot not learn because learning is so insinuated into the fabric of life.” According to him the
learning organizations are “organizations where people continually expand their capacity to
create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured,
where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning to see the
whole together”.
Learning organization can also be defined as an “Organization with an ingrained philosophy for
anticipating, reacting and responding to change, complexity and uncertainty.”
McGill and his colleagues had defined the learning organization as “a company that can
respond to new information by altering the very “programming” by which information is
processed and evaluated.”
A learning organization is one that is able to change its behaviours and mind-sets as a result of
experience. This may sound like an obvious statement, yet many organizations refuse to
acknowledge certain truths or facts and repeat dysfunctional behaviours over and again.
An organization needs to learn to survive and prosper in changing and uncertain environment. It needs
its managers to make right decisions through skill and sound judgment. Successful decision-making
requires the organization to improve its capability of learning new behaviours over a period of time.
This learning in the organization is a fighting process in the face of swift pace of change. In this battle
managers are responsible for increasing the awareness and the ability of the organizational employees
to comprehend and manage the organization and its environment. In this way they can make decisions
that continuously secure the organization to reach its goals.
However, most managers know how to ensure the organizational learning, but fail to understand how to
make their organization a learning organization.
Individuals and groups learn, and when conditions and systems are well designed. In a learning
organization, their learning can be shared across the organization and incorporated into its practices,
beliefs, policies, structure and culture.
The role of a leader in the learning organization is that of a designer, teacher, and steward who can
build shared vision and challenge prevailing mental models. He is responsible for building in which the
employees are continually expanding their capabilities to shape their future — that is, leaders are
responsible for learning.
The basic rationale for a learning organization is that in situations of rapid change only those that are
flexible, adaptive and productive will excel. For this to happen, it is argued, the organization needs to
‘discover how to tap employee’s commitment and capacity to learn at all levels’
The learning organization aims to bring new ideas, debate issues, introduce innovative methods and
offer case studies to others.
Over time, the notion of “learning organization” as an idealized and apolitical ‘end-state’ rather than as
a process, has increasingly gained uncritical acceptance.
The key ingredient of the learning organization is in how the organization processes its managerial
experiences. A learning organization learns from the experiences rather than being bound by its past
experiences. In the learning organization, the ability of the organization and its managers is not
measured by what it knows (that is the product of learning), but rather by how it learns — the process
of learning. Management practices encourage, recognize, and reward with openness, systemic thinking,
creativity, a sense of efficacy, and empathy.
While all the employees have the capacity to learn, the structures in which they have to function are
often not conducive to reflection and engagement. Furthermore, the employees may lack the tools and
guiding ideas to make sense of the situations they face. Hence the learning organization which is
always aspiring for success in its operation is to create a future that requires a fundamental shift of
mind among its employees.
Systems thinking
The idea of the learning organization developed from a body of work called systems thinking. This is a
conceptual framework that allows people to study businesses as bounded objects. Learning
organization uses this method of thinking when assessing the organization and has information systems
that measure the performance of the organization as a whole and of its various components. Systems –
thinking states that all the characteristics must be apparent at once in an organization for it to be a
learning organization. If some of these characteristics are missing then the organization falls short of its
goal. However some believes that the characteristics of a learning organization are factors that are
gradually acquired, rather than developed simultaneously. Systems – thinking is the conceptual
cornerstone of a learning organization. It is the discipline that integrates all the employees of the
organization, fusing them into a coherent body of theory and practice. Systems thinking ability to
comprehend and address the whole and to examine the interrelationship between the parts provides for
both the incentive and the means to integrate various disciplines in the organization.
Personal mastery
Organizations learn only through individuals who learn. Individual learning does not guarantee
organizational learning. But without it no organizational learning occurs. Personal mastery is the
discipline of continually clarifying and deepening employee’s personal vision, of focusing their
energies, of developing patience, and of seeing reality objectively. It goes beyond competence and
skills, although it involves them.
People with a high level of personal mastery live in a continual learning mode. They never ‘arrive’.
Sometimes, language, such as the term ‘personal mastery’ creates a misleading sense of definiteness, of
black and white. But personal mastery is not something you possess. It is a process. It is a lifelong
discipline. People with a high level of personal mastery are acutely aware of their ignorance, their
incompetence, and their growth areas. They are always deeply self-confident.
Mental models
Mental models are ‘deeply ingrained assumptions, generalizations, or even pictures and images that
influence how we understand the world and how we take action’.
The assumptions held by individuals and organizations are called mental models. To become a learning
organization, these models must be challenged. Individuals tend to espouse theories, which are what
they intend to follow, and theories-in-use, which are what they actually do. Similarly, organizations
tend to have ‘memories’ which preserve certain behaviours, norms and values. In creating a learning
environment it is important to replace confrontational attitudes with an open culture that promotes
inquiry and trust. To achieve this, the learning organization needs mechanisms for locating and
assessing organizational theories of action. Unwanted values need to be discarded by the process called
‘unlearning’.
The discipline of mental models starts with turning the mirror inward; learning to unearth our internal
pictures of the world, to bring them to the surface and hold them rigorously to scrutiny. It also includes
the ability to carry on ‘learningful’ conversations that balance inquiry and advocacy, where people
expose their own thinking effectively and make that thinking open to the influence of others.
If the organization is to develop a capacity to work with mental models then it is necessary for the
employees to learn new skills and develop new orientations. For this there need to be institutional
changes in order to foster such change. There need to have openness in the organization. It also
involved seeking to distribute organizational responsibly far more widely while retaining coordination
and control.
If any one idea about leadership that has inspired organizations for thousands of years, is the capacity
to hold a share picture of the future the organizations seek to create. Such a vision has the power to be
uplifting – and to encourage experimentation and innovation. Crucially, it is argued, it can also foster a
sense of the long-term vision, something that is fundamental
The development of a shared vision is important in motivating the employees to learn, as it creates a
common identity that provides focus and energy for learning. The most successful visions normally
build on the individual visions of the employees at all levels of the organization. The creation of a
shared vision can be hindered by traditional structures where the organizational vision is imposed from
above. Therefore, a learning organization tends to have flat, decentralized organizational structure. The
shared vision is often to succeed against a competitor for which there can be transitory goals. However
there should also be long term goals that are intrinsic within the organization.
When there is a genuine vision (as opposed to the familiar ‘vision statement’), employees excel and
learn, not because they are told to, but because they want to. But many leaders have personal visions
that never get translated into shared visions that galvanize the organization. What has been lacking is a
discipline for translating vision into shared vision – not a ‘cookbook’ but a set of principles and guiding
practices.
The practice of shared vision involves the skills of unearthing shared ‘pictures of the future’ that foster
genuine commitment and enrolment rather than compliance. In mastering this discipline, management
is to learn the counter-productiveness of trying to dictate a vision, no matter how heartfelt it is.
Visions spread because of a reinforcing process. Increased clarity, enthusiasm and commitment rub off
on others in the organization. ‘As people talk, the vision grows clearer. As it gets clearer, enthusiasm
for its benefits grow. There are ‘limits to growth’ in this respect, but developing the sorts of mental
models can significantly improve matters. Where the organizations can transcend linear and grasp
system thinking, there is the possibility of bringing vision to fruition.
Team learning
The accumulation of individual learning constitutes team learning. The benefit of team or shared
learning is that the employees grow more quickly and the problem solving capacity of the organization
is improved through better access to knowledge and expertise. A learning organization has structures
that facilitate team learning with features such as boundary crossing and openness. Team learning
requires individuals to engage in dialogue and discussion. Therefore team members must develop open
communication, shared meaning, and shared understanding. A learning organization typically has
excellent knowledge management structures, allowing creation, acquisition, dissemination, and
implementation of this knowledge in the organization.
Team learning is viewed as ‘the process of aligning and developing the capacities of a team to create
the results its members truly desire. It builds on personal mastery and shared vision – but these are not
enough. Employees need to be able to act together. When teams learn together then not only there are
good results for the organization but the team members also grow more rapidly which could not have
happened otherwise.
The discipline of team learning starts with ‘dialogue’, the capacity of members of a team to suspend
assumptions and enter into a genuine ‘thinking together’.
The notion of dialogue amongst team members helps them to become open to the flow of a larger
intelligence. When the dialogue is joined with systems thinking, there is the possibility of creating a
language more suited for dealing with complexity, and of focusing on deep-seated structural issues and
forces rather than being diverted by questions of personality and leadership style.
A learning organization does not rely on passive or ad hoc process in the hope that organizational
learning will take place through serendipity or as a by-product of normal work. A learning organization
actively promotes, facilitates, and rewards collective learning. The main benefits of a learning
organization are as follows.
Improving the corporate image of the organization by becoming more people oriented
MANAGEMENT TRAINING
When I think of “training,” I think of one kind of learning. Training conveys to me the idea of making
people more alike than different in some respect and trying to deemphasize individual differences in
some particular area. For example, a number of persons are trained to operate a complicated piece of
equipment. Once the equipment is designed and built, hopefully to the specifications that optimize a
person’s ability to operate the machine, training programs are implemented in order that the operator
may “fit” himself or herself to the machine. Individual differences among people in terms of how they
operate the machine may cut down on the machines’ efficiency. Time-and motion studies represent
another approach where training may be utilized to make people respond to a set behavioral pattern.
What about management training? Many organizations spend considerable time, energy, and dollars to
make their managers more alike than different. Instilling company values and philosophy and
inculcating the organization’s climate and norms are examples of exposing managers to ideas and
ideals they are expected to emulate and to think similarly about. Training managers in specific skill
areas—data processing, budget and accounting techniques, salary administration— are other examples
of applications of management training.
MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT
Whereas management training attempts to level out individual differences, management development
provides a different kind of learning opportunity. To me, development means legitimizing individual
differences, providing opportunities for the person to actualize his or her own potential, and
encouraging managers to be more different than they are alike along certain dimensions. As with
training, numerous organizations invest extensively into management development programs.
Examples of management development include the following: career testing and counseling programs,
in which the person receives feedback based on test results about his or her abilities, interests, and
personality; university programs geared towards a continuing education experience for the person, such
as new ideas about management and advanced technological advances the manager needs to know
about; and personal growth experiences, in which the person comes to an increased awareness and
understanding of himself or herself and how he or she affects other people. Each of these provides an
experience aimed at developing the individual’s unique potential. The focal point is on self-
development. The assumption made here is that increased self-awareness and understanding can lead to
attitudinal or behavioral changes that will increase an individual’s personal effectiveness and ultimately
the effectiveness of the organization.
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT
Conceptually, organization development is different from both management training and management
development. The latter two kinds of learning may, however, be part of an OD effort. Burke (1971)
stated that “although persons may be involved in events that are properly labeled as OD technology
(some of the examples mentioned above), such activities are not considered organizational
development if they are not part of a planned effort at changing the organization’s culture.” In short,
OD can be defined as a planned process of cultural change utilizing behavioral science knowledge as a
base for interventions aimed at increasing the organization’s health and effectiveness (Beckhard, 1969).
As such, its focus is not solely on the individual person and his or her growth in the organization.
Rather, the focus is on how the individual relates to his or her own work group and how his or her
group interfaces with other groups in the organization. Again, to use Burke’s words: “The primary
reason for using OD is a need to improve some or all of the system that constitutes the total
organization.” Such a planned process demands careful assessment or diagnosis of what is needed to
increase overall effectiveness, along with tailor-made changes or interventions, the goals of which are
to satisfy those felt needs. The key concern of behavioral science practitioners involved in OD work is,
of course, to create the kind of organizational climate wherein individuals meet their own needs and, at
the same time, optimize the realization of organizational goals. Team-building, learning how to
diagnose needs, working through task and interpersonal issues, creating structural and functional
changes to facilitate effectiveness are some examples that may be part of an OD effort.
These three approaches to organization growth are certainly not mutually exclusive. Rather, each is
complementary to the other. Often one phase evolves rather naturally into another. However, the
evaluation has a definite sequence. Generally, the pattern follows one of management
training®management development®organization development. For example, before effective
intergroup work (part of an OD sequence) is done, it is of great importance that team-building within
each group be conducted.
Determination of Vision is provided by top There is a shared vision that can emerge
overall direction management from many places, but top management is
responsible or ensuring that this vision
exists and is nurtured.
Formulation and Top management decides what is to Formulation and implementation of ideas
implementation of be done, and the rest of the take place at all levels of the organisation.
ideas. organisation acts on these ideas.
Nature of Each person is responsible for his Personnel understand their own jobs as well
organisational or her own job responsibilities, and as the way in which their own work
thinking the focus is on developing interrelates and influences that of other
individual competence. personnel
Conflict resolution Conflicts are resolved through the Conflicts are resolved through the use of
use of power and hierarchical collaborative learning and the integration of
influence. diverse viewpoints of personnel throughout
the organisation.
Leadership and The role o the leader is the establish The role of the leader is to build a shared
motivation the organisation’s vision, provide vision, empower the personnel, inspire
rewards and punishments as commitment, and encourage effective
appropriate, and maintain overall decision making throughout the enterprise
control of employee activities. through the use of empowerment and
charismatic leadership
COMPENSATION
Compensation is the total cash and non-cash payments that you give to an employee in exchange for
the work they do for your business. It is typically one of the biggest expenses for businesses with
employees. Compensation is more than an employee’s regular paid wages. It also includes many other
types of wages and benefits.
Types of compensation
Components of Compensation
Compensation will be perceived by employees as fair if based on systematic components. Various
compensation systems have developed to determine the value of positions. These systems utilize many
similar components including job descriptions, salary ranges/structures, and written procedures.
Job Descriptions A critical component of both compensation and selection systems, job
descriptions define in writing the responsibilities, requirements, functions, duties, location,
environment, conditions, and other aspects of jobs. Descriptions may be developed for jobs
individually or for entire job families.
Job Analysis The process of analyzing jobs from which job descriptions are developed. Job
analysis techniques include the use of interviews, questionnaires, and observation.
Job Evaluation A system for comparing jobs for the purpose of determining appropriate
compensation levels for individual jobs or job elements. There are four main techniques:
Ranking, Classification, Factor Comparison, and Point Method.
Pay Structures Useful for standardizing compensation practices. Most pay structures include
several grades with each grade containing a minimum salary/wage and either step increments or
grade range. Step increments are common with union positions where the pay for each job is
pre-determined through collective bargaining.
Salary Surveys Collections of salary and market data. May include average salaries, inflation
indicators, cost of living indicators, salary budget averages. Companies may purchase results of
surveys conducted by survey vendors or may conduct their own salary surveys. When
purchasing the results of salary surveys conducted by other vendors, note that surveys may be
conducted within a specific industry or across industries as well as within one geographical
region or across different geographical regions. Know which industry or geographic location
the salary results pertain to before comparing the results to your company.
COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION
Objectives
Compensation is an integral part of human resource management which helps in motivating the
employees and improving organizational effectiveness. Effectiveness in terms of:
Cost effectiveness
Direct compensation
It refers to monetary benefits offered and provided to employees in return of the services they
provide to the organization. The monetary benefits include basic salary, house rent allowance,
conveyance, leave travel allowance, medical reimbursements, special allowances, bonus, PF/Gratuity,
etc. They are given at a regular interval at a definite time.
Indirect Compensation
It refers to non-monetary benefits offered and provided to employees in lieu of the services
provided by them to the organization. They include paid leave, car/transportation, Medical Aids and
assistance, Insurance (for self and family), Leave travel Assistance, Retirement Benefits, Holiday
Homes.
Objectives
Organisational Objectives:
The compensation system should be duly aligned with the organisational need and should also be
flexible enough to modification in response to change.
Accordingly, the objectives of system should be to:
5. Achieve flexibility in the system to accommodate organisational changes as and when these take
place.
Individual Objectives:
From individual employee’s point of view, the compensation system should have the following
objectives:
3. Avoids the chances of favoritism from creeping in when wage rates are assigned.
Collective Objectives:
1) Productivity of workers: to get the best results from the employees and to increase the productivity
compensation has to be productivity based.
2) Ability to pay: it depends upon the employer’s ability to pay wages to the workers. This depends
upon the profitability of the firm. If the firm is marginal and can’t afford to pay higher than the
competitors then the employees will go to other firms while if the company is successful then they can
easily pay their employees as they wish.
3) Government: government has also fixed the rules for protecting the interest of the employees. The
organizations are liable to pay as per the government instructions. Wages can not be fixed below the
level prescribed by the government.
4) Labor union: labor union also helps in paying better wages to the workers. Higher wages have to be
paid by the firm to its workers under the pressure of the trade unions.
5) Cost of living: wages depends upon the cost of living if it is high wages will also hike.
6) Demand and supply of labor: it is one of the important factors affecting wages. If the demand of
labor is more they will be paid high wages otherwise vice versa. If the supply of the employees is more
than they will be paid less and vice versa.
7) Prevailing wage rate: wages also depends upon the prevailing wage rate as the organizations have
to pay accordingly to keep the employees with them.
These are the 7 factors affecting compensation.
MONETARY AND NON MONETARY BENEFITS.
They say that money makes the world go around. However, this may not be true all the time,
especially when you are talking about motivating your employees.
Based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, wages are highly important and usually one of the common
motivators. They satisfy the immediate necessities of men such as food, clothing, and shelter. But what
is really essential are the needs found on the higher levels, and they are not associated with
money.
Here are the six non-monetary benefits you can provide to your employees:
1.Flexibility
It is a mandate for employees to follow their bosses, but if supervisors get all the say, they will
immediately feel limited. Workers still require a room where they can voice out their opinion and
ideas, as well as the liberty to be versatile on their approaches to conflicts and problems.
You can also emphasize flexibility in terms of work hours. Most of the career people these days are
moms and dads who have greater personal responsibilities. To be able to work at their own pace will
permit them to take care of all their obligations (both at home and at the office).
2.Recognition
Who does not want to be recognized? Yet many employees are not given even a pat in the back or a
handshake by their bosses. If they give employers the privilege to criticize, it is only right for the
managers to give away praises.
Recognition can come in different forms. A simple e-mail blast can already do wonders. You may also
hold an informal appreciation ceremony for all those who have excelled expectations for a given
month.
3.Training
When you train your employees, it means there is plenty of room for them to grow. They don’t have to
feel stuck to a routine job. They can look forward to much bigger challenges. Trainings give good
types of stress, something that motivates employees to push themselves to the limit. Personally, it
gives them a good idea of their own strengths and weaknesses.
Trainings, however, should be in line with the career path the employee wants to take. Otherwise,
they cannot use the learning to the fullest. It is best to conduct skill assessment before creating training
programs.
4.Belongingness
Sickness is just one of the least causes of absenteeism. It is actually conflict and politics in the
workplace that makes workers hate coming to the office. Though most employees understand the
employee-manager relationship, it is also important to them that they can sense a feeling of friendship
and belongingness.
Take time to come up with team-building activities. It does not have to be very long or tedious. Your
team simply has to strengthen trust, respect, and accountability with each other.
5.Chance to Contribute You can greatly motivate your employees if you can make them feel that the
success of your organization also depends on them. You can do this by allowing them to head
projects as well as getting their consensus on major decisions that can affect your business and
organization.
Fringe Benefits
Fringe benefits include additional allowances, leaves, health insurance plans, and other perks that they
can enjoy alone or with their loved ones.
The range, variety and importance of fringe benefits in employment policies have grown in recent
years, partly because of the nature of personal taxation and partly because of pressure from other
sources such as the rapidly increasing competition for employees. Fringe benefit packages have been
adopted in order to motivate employees to enhance their performance and to encourage them to
maintain and extend their continuity of service with their employer. They include benefits that attract
little or no tax, such as meals and holidays, and deferred earnings such as pensions. Fringe benefits
have considerable value to many employers in that they represent a form of reward that does not
necessarily have progressive or long-term effects in the way that a salary increase does. A salary
increase is usually for all time. It affects all future settlements because most settlements are percentage
based. Also a salary is the basis for settlements such as redundancy and pension rights whereas many
fringe benefits may not have such long-term effects.
The total list of benefits offered today is considerable and is continually growing as employers look for
new ways to woo employees. They can be divided into three main types: financial, part-financial and
non-financial.