Scribd
Upload
548 views

Ansys Flutter

This document discusses a new method for analyzing blade flutter in turbomachinery using integrated fluid structure interaction. Blade flutter occurs when vibration of the blades is amplified by the changing pressure field, potentially leading to failure. The new method uses computational fluid dynamics to model the unsteady fluid forces and finite element analysis to model blade vibrations, and couples the two analyses to predict whether vibration modes will be stable or cause flutter. This integrated approach allows designers to evaluate flutter early in the design process and avoid costly repairs.

Uploaded by

fhd_bd
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
548 views

Ansys Flutter

This document discusses a new method for analyzing blade flutter in turbomachinery using integrated fluid structure interaction. Blade flutter occurs when vibration of the blades is amplified by the changing pressure field, potentially leading to failure. The new method uses computational fluid dynamics to model the unsteady fluid forces and finite element analysis to model blade vibrations, and couples the two analyses to predict whether vibration modes will be stable or cause flutter. This integrated approach allows designers to evaluate flutter early in the design process and avoid costly repairs.

Uploaded by

fhd_bd
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

TURBOMACHINERY

Streamlined
Flutter Analysis
Integrated fluid structure interaction enables high-fidelity
turbomachinery blade flutter analysis.

By Robin Elder and Ian Woods, PCA Engineers Limited, Lincoln, U.K. The “flutter” of blades within compressors and turbines
Simon Mathias, ANSYS, Inc. is a serious cause of machine failure that is difficult to
predict and expensive to correct. This aeromechanical phe-
nomenon usually occurs at a blade natural frequency and
involves sustained blade vibration resulting from the changing
pressure field around the blade as it oscillates. For the
process to occur, it is necessary that, over one cycle, there
is an input of energy from the gas stream to the blade of a
sufficient magnitude to overcome the mechanical damping.
Clearly, flutter is dependent on both the aerodynamic
and structural characteristics of the blade, and, until
recently, it has been beyond the design capability to
satisfactorily investigate and avoid this phenomenon.
Historically, empirical design criteria have been used based
on parameters involving blade natural frequencies and flow
transit times, but these methods fail to take into account
generally found vibrational modes or the influence of
adjacent blades.
Improvements in unsteady computational fluid dynamics
(CFD) capability combined with the ability to easily and
accurately transfer information between CFD and finite
element analysis (FEA) has enabled the development of an
advanced yet efficient and cost-effective methodology for
analyzing forced vibration processes.
A key enabling development now provided by ANSYS,
Inc. is the ability to deform the CFD computational grid in
response to deformations at the fluid structure interface
and integrate this with unsteady flow computations. The
process is straightforward to set up and is facilitated by the
ANSYS Mechanical analysis tools can predict vibration modes that occur over an entire intuitive and intrinsic functionality of the user interface and
wheel from a single blade component model. Shown here are exaggerated deformations layout in the ANSYS Workbench platform. PCA Engineers
for a four-nodal diameter mode shape, meaning that the mode repeats itself four times
over the entire wheel circumference. Engineers are interested in determining whether
Limited, based in the U.K., has utilized this capability by
vibration modes such as these will be amplified by interaction with the fluid or safely mapping time-dependent deformations computed from a
damped out. finite element analysis to the CFD computational grid.
As a rule, blade flutter occurs at a blade natural
frequency that is determined together with its corresponding
mode of vibration using traditional finite element
techniques.
A bladed disc assembly can be classified as a rotation-
ally periodic structure, and, therefore, the mode shape of
adjacent blades within a row are fully defined by a phase

4 ANSYS Advantage • Volume I, Issue 3, 2007 www.ansys.com


TURBOMACHINERY

Finite element (FE) mesh at the fluid–structure interface A typical torsional blade mode, where the relative Equivalent stresses
amplitude of each node point on the gas swept
surface of the blade is known as a function of time

difference. This phase difference (the inter-blade phase


angle or IBPA) depends on the number of blades in the row
and the number of patterns repeating around the annulus.
This latter parameter is often called the nodal diameter (ND)
and can move either in the direction of rotation or against
the direction of rotation.
The significant development is that this modal displace-
ment information now can be applied to the computational
grid and the resulting time varying flow through a blade row
as well as the dynamic pressure field over each defined
blade calculated using ANSYS CFX software. The computed
dynamic pressure distribution and the corresponding modal
displacements then are used to compute the work done on
the blade over one complete cycle. If the net work done on
the blade is positive, then work is being imparted to the
blade, creating negative damping, a potentially unstable
situation leading to a self-sustained vibration (flutter) likely to
cause a material fatigue failure. On the other hand, if the
aerodynamic work done on the blade is negative, the blade Deformations of a four-nodal diameter which repeat once over each quarter of
the wheel, were exported from the modal analysis vibration mode to ANSYS CFX
motion is doing work on the fluid and leads to a stable or software as a boundary profile. The mode shape is used to create a periodic
damped vibration. boundary motion in the CFD software and to evaluate the net work input due to
In the aerodynamic damping case illustrated, the blade the blade motion.

is stable (no flutter) because the damping is always positive.


This information is critical to the designer as blades are 0.2
relatively easy to modify before manufacture but extremely
costly to rectify in an operational plant. By utilizing blade 0.16
flutter prediction early in the design cycle, costly damage
and repairs can be avoided. This integrated design and 0.12
analysis approach in multiphysics technology from ANSYS Damping
can lead to improved quality and dependability of the Coef
0.08
(log)
design process, realizing further cost benefits to clients.
ANSYS, Inc. and PCA Engineers now are applying such 0.04
technology to a wide range of applications extending from
large steam turbines to small turbochargers. These tech- 0
niques are assisting engineers to design compressor and -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
turbine blading in which both aerodynamic efficiency and
Inter-Blade Phase Angle (deg)
structural integrity are paramount over the operational range
of the machine. ■ Damping coefficients can be calculated from the CFD results. Negative net work
input due to blade motion results in a positive damping coefficient. Negative
www.pcaeng.co.uk damping coefficients induce sustained blade vibration, or flutter, which could
lead to blade failure. These results show positive damping for all inter-blade
phase angles.

www.ansys.com ANSYS Advantage • Volume I, Issue 3, 2007 5

You might also like