Sense Properties and Stereotypes
Sense Properties and Stereotypes
The SENSE of an expression is its indispensable hard core of meaning. The sense of an
expression can be thought of as the sum of its sense properties and sense relations with other
expressions. For the moment, we will concentrate on three important sense properties of
sentences, the properties of being analytic, of being synthetic, and of being contradictory.
An ANALYTIC sentence is one that is necessarily TRUE, as a result of the senses of the
words in it. An analytic sentence, therefore, reflects a tacit (unspoken) agreement by speakers
of the language about the senses of the words in it.
A SYNTHETIC sentence is one which is NOT analytic, but may be either true or false,
depending on the way the world is.
Example
Analytic: All elephants are animals. The truth of the sentence follows from the senses of
elephant and animal.
Synthetic: John is from Ireland. There is nothing in the senses of John or Ireland or from
which makes this necessarily true or false.
Analytic sentences are always true (necessarily so, by virtue of the senses of the words in
them), whereas synthetic sentences can be sometimes true, sometimes false, depending on the
circumstances.
Example
This animal is a vegetable is a contradiction. This must be false because of the senses of
animal and vegetable.
Both of John’s parents are married to aunts of mine is a contradiction. This must be false
because of the senses of both parents, married, and aunt.
SYNONYMY is the relationship between two predicates that have the same sense
Example
Example : Bachelors prefer redhaired girls is a paraphrase of Girls with red hair are preferred
by unmarried men
HYPONYMY is a sense relation between predicates (or sometimes longer phrases) such that
the meaning of one predicate (or phrase) is included in the meaning of the other.
Example: The meaning of red is included in the meaning of scarlet. Red is the superordinate
term; scarlet is a hyponym of red (scarlet is a kind of red).
Hyponymy and synonymy are sense relations between predicates. The latter is a special,
symmetric, case of the former. Entailment and paraphrase are sense relations between
sentences, the latter being a special, symmetric case of the former. The sense relations
between predicates and those between sentences are systematically connected by rules such
as the basic rule of sense inclusion. These sense relations are also systematically connected
with such sense properties of sentences as ANALYTICITY and CONTRADICTION.
A case of HOMONYMY is one of an ambiguous word whose different senses are far apart
from each other and not obviously related to each other in any way with respect to a native
speaker’s intuition. Cases of homonymy seem very definitely to be matters of mere accident
or coincidence.
Examples
Bank (financial institution vs the side of a river or stream) is another clear case of
homonymy.
There is no obvious conceptual connection between the two meanings of either word.
A case of POLYSEMY is one where a word has several very closely related senses. In other
words, a native speaker of the language has clear intuitions that the different senses are
related to each other in some way.
The two senses are clearly related by the concepts of an opening from the interior of some
solid mass to the outside, and of a place of issue at the end of some long narrow channel.
Polysemy in nouns is quite common in human languages. Some additional examples will be
given for you to think about in the exercises at the end of this unit.
A sentence which is ambiguous because its words relate to each other in different ways, even
though none of the individual words are ambiguous, is STRUCTURALLY (or
GRAMMATICALLY) AMBIGUOUS.
Example : The chicken is ready to eat (and many of the other sentences we have used) is
structurally ambiguous.