Chapter Three: Soil Moisture Retention
Chapter Three: Soil Moisture Retention
2 r cos g r 2 h
2 cos
h
g r
for the water the value of the angle ɵ is too small so ɵ ≈ 0 then cos ɵ ≈1 hence :
2
h
gr
For water g 9800 N / m 3 and the surface tension is 0.0756 N / m then the equation will be :
2 2 0.0756 1.5 10 5
h
gr 9800r r
1 .5
h
r
Where; r is the radius of capillary in mm, and h is the height in cm for glass tube
For the soil it can be written approximately as
1 .5
h
d
Where: d is average diameter of soil particles in mm and h in cm
Page 1 of 7
The existence of capillary water in soil indicates that the soil isn't saturated and the water pressure is
negative. So the movement of that water is very little because it is hold by forces which reduces its
energy and makes the water movement slowly if we compared with the gravitational water. The basic
movement of the capillary water is due to the changes in the thickening of water film in macro pore.
Available water.
Soil moisture between field capacity and permanent wilting point is referred to as available
moisture. It is the moisture available for plant use. In general, fine-textured soils have a wide
range of water between field capacity and permanent wilting point than coarse textured
soils. In contrast, sandy soils with their larger proportion of non-capillary pore space release
most of their water within a narrow range of potential because of the predominance of large
pores. The table bellow presents the range of available water holding capacities of different
soil textural groups. For irrigation system design, the total available water is calculated for a
soil depth based on the root system of a mature plant of the crop to be grown.
Readily available water: It is that portion of the available water that is relatively easy for the a
plant to use. It is common to consider about 50% of the available water, or less depends on the
method of irrigation, Plant and quality of water.
Page 2 of 7
S o i l M o i s t u r e D e te r m i na t i o n
Introduction
Several methods can be used to determine soil water content, and new
methods are being developed
It is important to have measurements of soil water content to determine when to
schedule irrigations
1. Gravimetric Method
Perhaps the most accurate method is the gravimetric method. in which soil samples
are taken to a laboratory and weighed, dried in an oven for several hours, then
weighed again
The difference in weights corresponds to the mass of water in the soil
The gravimetric method has the disadvantage that it takes several hours to collect
and prepare soil samples, and requires laboratory equipment
This method is sometimes used by researchers and students in our department.
2. Porous Blocks
Porous blocks have been used for many years to measure soil water content
Common block materials are gypsum, ceramic, nylon, and fiberglass
The cost per block is around $5 to S10
Page 3 of 7
The blocks may last for more than one year, but sometimes for only one
season
These are simple and inexpensive. but are not particularly accurate
The calibration of porous blocks tends to shift with time, and as
mentioned above. it also depends on soil water salinity
3. Watermark Blocks
4. Neutron Probe
Page 4 of 7
Vertical access tubes for inserting the probe are usually aluminum or PVC, but
the calibration is different for these two materials — the probe reading is not affected
by aluminum. but PVC has some hydrogen, and this does affect the reading
Neutron probes are radioactive and can be health
hazards if handled improperly. Users should have formal
training on the application and storage of these devices. and
should wear badges that call to checked for level of exposure to
radiation
This device is still used (and preferred) by some
agricultural extension agents and researchers in the USA
Page 5 of 7
The final measurement represents th e av e rage v ol u m e tri c wa t e r content over the
length of the wave guides
The guides must be completely inserted into the soil
With most TDR. an expensive ,cable tester" (a specialized oscilloscope) is needed to
take the measurements
6. FDR Sensor
A sensor similar to the TDR is the FDR sensor
(Campbell Scientific)
This sensor uses frequency domain reflectometry
The physics of the method are similar to TDR,
only with FDR, a high frequency series of pulses
is sent down the wave guides rather than a
single pulse
The electronics for the system then measure the
shift in frequency rather than the change in time
The required electronics are built into each
sensor, so an expensive "cable tester is not
needed as it is with TDR
However. each water content reflectometer sensor is a bit more expensive (about
200$)
But each sensor can to read directly and automatically using a Campbell data logger
Other sensors use techniques that are similar to TDR, however, instead of relying on
a reflection of a signal, they merely measure the time for a signal to travel a certain
distance along guides
These guides are in the form of wires. and should be about 10-m long to make a loop
back to the source
The benefit of these sensors is that they measure a long integrated path of soil
This is valuable where the crop root extraction or the infiltration of irrigation water
is highly variable
It may be possible to use these sensors to measure the average water content of a
full root zone
This would allow one to determine ET as a difference in water content over time
Page 6 of 7
7. Tensiometers
Page 7 of 7