Scribd
Upload
47 views1 page

125 Ec Ece Icsss2017 RF

This document is a reviewer form for a paper submitted to the IEEE Third International Conference on Sensing, Signal Processing and Security (ICSSS 2017). The paper is titled "Performance Analysis Of Vascaded Optical Fibers Using DP-16 QAM Modulation". The reviewer rated the quality of the paper as average and recommended it may be considered with major revisions after resubmission. The reviewer suggested the author compare the performance to some existing method.

Uploaded by

RiturajPaul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
47 views1 page

125 Ec Ece Icsss2017 RF

This document is a reviewer form for a paper submitted to the IEEE Third International Conference on Sensing, Signal Processing and Security (ICSSS 2017). The paper is titled "Performance Analysis Of Vascaded Optical Fibers Using DP-16 QAM Modulation". The reviewer rated the quality of the paper as average and recommended it may be considered with major revisions after resubmission. The reviewer suggested the author compare the performance to some existing method.

Uploaded by

RiturajPaul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

St.

PETER’S COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY


(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, affiliated to AU, Chennai, ISO 2008:9001 Certified)
NAAC Accredited with ‘A’ Grade
College Road, Avadi, Chennai-600054.
Phone: 044-26558089, 26558091 Website:www.spcet.ac.in/icsss2017 E-mail: [email protected]

CSIR and ICMR SPONSORED


IEEE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
SENSING, SIGNAL PROCESSING AND SECURITY-ICSSS 2017
Reviewer Form
ECE-ICSSS-2017-125
Paper id & Title Performance Analysis Of Vascaded Optical Fibers
Using DP-16 QAM Modulation
Reviewer Information The quality is average
Reviewer Report
S. Criteria Ratings
5 4 3 2 1 0
No.
1. Originality of the Paper √
2. Technical Relevance to the Conference √
3. Adequacy of Paper Title and Abstract √
4. Quality of Technical Content √
5. Appropriateness of Figures and Tables √
6. Suitable Literature Citations √
7. Adequacy of Experimental Analysis √
8. Soundness of Conclusions and Interpretations √
9. Adherence to the Instructions to Authors √
10. Overall Structure of the Paper √

Paper Status: 2

1. Strongly Recommended

2. Recommended with minor Changes

3. May be considered with major revisions after resubmission

4. Not Recommended

Review Comments (if any): Author may compare the performance with some existing
method.

You might also like