0% found this document useful (0 votes)
109 views

Semester I 2020/2021 Subject: System Analysis and Design (SECD2613) Section: Task: P1-Project Proposal (12%) Due: P1 Guidelines

The document outlines the guidelines for Project 1 (P1) of the System Analysis and Design course. It includes 3 main tasks: 1) conducting a problem background study, 2) proposing a feasibility study, and 3) creating a project plan. The proposal must include an introduction, background study, problem statement, proposed solutions, objectives, scope, and project planning details. It will be graded based on 12% of the total course grade.

Uploaded by

Nza Hawramy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
109 views

Semester I 2020/2021 Subject: System Analysis and Design (SECD2613) Section: Task: P1-Project Proposal (12%) Due: P1 Guidelines

The document outlines the guidelines for Project 1 (P1) of the System Analysis and Design course. It includes 3 main tasks: 1) conducting a problem background study, 2) proposing a feasibility study, and 3) creating a project plan. The proposal must include an introduction, background study, problem statement, proposed solutions, objectives, scope, and project planning details. It will be graded based on 12% of the total course grade.

Uploaded by

Nza Hawramy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Semester I 2020/2021

Subject : System Analysis and Design (SECD2613)


Section :
Task : P1- Project Proposal (12%)
Due :
_____________________________________________________________________________
P1 Guidelines

Task Deliverables (items in Proposal)

1 Conduct problem background  Introduction


 Organizational background study,  Problem Statement
 What areas the systems to cover  Proposed Solutions
(scope)  Objectives
o What will be included  Scope
o What will not be included
 Benefits from the
systems/contribution

2 Propose feasibility study (technical,  Findings from feasibility study (background study)
operational, economical)  CBA

3 Project Plan  WBS


 Time to produce the systems  Gantt Chart
 Who will produce it  Pert Chart (Optional)
 A deadline (expected completion
date)

Prepare a proposal with the items below:

1.0 Introduction
2.0 Background Study
3.0 Problem Statement
4.0 Proposed Solutions (include feasibility study)
5.0 Objectives
6.0 Scope
7.0 Project Planning
7.1 Human Resource
7.2 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
7.3 PERT Chart (based on WBS)
7.4 Gantt Chart
8.0 Benefit and Summary of Proposed System

1
P2 Mark Allocation

ITEM %

PO2 (Apply) Exercises related to CO2 2

Technical aspect for CO3 (Part B) 3

PO3 (Problem Solving) Technical aspect for CO3 (Part C) 5

PO7 (Teamwork) Self/Peer Evaluation 1

Instructor Observation (Part A) 1

TOTAL 12

PART A (1%) Teamwork

Criteria High (4) Average (3) Low (2) Unsatisfied (1)

Teamwork The team worked The team worked The team worked Team did NOT
WELL TOGETHER to WELL TOGETHER together most of the COLLABORATE
achieve objectives. MOST OF THE TIME, time, POSSIBLE or communicate well.
Each member with only a few FAILURE to
contributed in a occurrences of collaborate when
valuable way to the communication appropriate.
project. breakdown. Members Some members
were mostly would work
respectful of each independently,
other. without regard to
objectives or
priorities.

PART B (4%) Technical Aspect

Criteria High (4) Average (3) Low (2) Unsatisfied (1)

Explains Issues CLEARLY identifies SUCCESSFULLY IDENTIFIES main FAILS to identify,


and Clear and summarizes main identifies and issues but does not summarize or explain
Content issues and summarizes the main summarize or the main problem or
Organization successfully explain issues, but does not explain them clearly questions.
why/how they are explain why/how they or sufficiently Represents the issues
problems or are problems or inaccurately or
questions; and create questions. inappropriately.
identifies embedded
or implicit issues,
addressing their
relationship

Method of Organization SOME SIGNS of POORLY organized OR


organization is WELL- SUPPORTS logical organization. demonstrates serious
SUITED to assignment and May have abrupt or problems with
assignment; clear purpose; sequence of illogical shifts and progression of ideas; a
intro, body, and ideas could be ineffective flows of written form of
conclusion with improved ideas speech
effective transitions.

2
Content Content is somewhat Content is somewhat Content is Content UNCLEAR;
Development ACCURATE AND ACCURATE AND somewhat VAGUE LAPSES IN
& Writing CLEAR; offers SOLID FAIRLY CLEAR; offers OR only LOOSELY COHERENCE OR NO
AND ACCURATE SOLID BUT LESS RELATED to the RELATION to writing
reasoning; contains ACCURATE reasoning; writing task; at times task; offers simplistic,
appropriate details contains some may be OFF TOPIC undeveloped support
and / or examples appropriate details OR TOO BROAD with for ideas.
and / or examples limited support

Written works has NO Written works is Written work has Written work has
MAJOR ERRORS in RELATIVELY FREE OF SEVERAL MAJOR SERIOUS AND
word selection and ERRORS in word ERRORS in word PERSISTENT ERRORS
use, sentence selection and use, selection and use, in word selection and
structure, spelling, sentence structure, sentence structure, use, sentence
punctuation and spelling, punctuation spelling, punctuation structure, spelling,
capitalization. and capitalization and capitalization punctuation and
capitalization

PART C (4%) Technical Aspect

Criteria High (4) Average (3) Low (2) Unsatisfied (1)

Complete Project Complete, precise Task description is Task description is Unclear and
Plan and clear task FAIRLY COMPLETE vague and unclear. incomplete task
description. AND CLEAR. Time allocation for description.
Time allocation for Time allocation for each task is FAIRLY Time allocation for
each task is HIGHLY each task is ACCEPTABLE. each task is UNLOGIC
ACCEPTABLE. ACCEPTABLE. and UNACCEPTABLE.

Complete Budget Complete and clear Budget description is Budget description is Unclear and
Planning budget allocation. FAIRLY COMPLETE vague and unclear. incomplete budget
Budget allocation is AND CLEAR. Budget allocation is description.
HIGHLY ACCEPTABLE. Budget allocation is FAIRLY ACCEPTABLE. Budget allocation for
ACCEPTABLE. each task is UNLOGIC
and UNACCEPTABLE.

Complete Task Human resource for Human resource in Human resource in Unclear and
and Human each task is HIGHLY task allocation is task allocation is incomplete task
Resource ACCEPTABLE. ACCEPTABLE. FAIRLY ACCEPTABLE. description.
Planning Time allocation for
each task is UNLOGIC
and UNACCEPTABLE.

You might also like