R.M.

Shahbab
Lecturer
Dept. of IPE, BUET
IPE 303
Product Design
Chapter 6: Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading

Introduction
• Often, machine members are found to have failed well below the ultimate strength of the
material, and quite frequently even below the yield strength. How?
• The most distinguishing characteristic of these failures is that the stresses have been
repeated a very large number of times, which is known as Fatigue Failure.
• The condition frequently arises, however, in which the stresses vary with time or they
fluctuate between different levels. These kinds of stresses are known as variable,
repeated, alternating, or fluctuating stresses.
• Most machine elements are subjected to varying or fluctuating stresses (due to the
movement) such as shafts, gears, bearings, cams & followers, etc.
• Fluctuating stresses (repeated over long period of time) will cause a part to fail (fracture)
at a stress level much smaller than the ultimate strength (or even the yield strength in some
cases).
• Unlike static loading where failure usually can be detected before it happens (due to the
large deflections associated with plastic deformation), fatigue failures are usually sudden
and therefore dangerous.
• Fatigue failure is due to crack formation and propagation. Fatigue cracks usually initiate
at locations with high stresses such as discontinuities (hole, notch, scratch, sharp corner,
crack, inclusions, etc.).
 • Fatigue cracks can also initiate at surfaces having rough surface finish. Thus, all parts
subjected to fatigue loading are heat treated and polished in order to increase the fatigue
life.

Fatigue Life Methods

Fatigue failure is a much more complicated phenomenon than static failure where much
complicating factors are involved. Also, testing materials for fatigue properties is more
complicated and much more time consuming than static testing.

Fatigue life methods are aimed to determine the life (number of loading cycles) of an element until
failure.

The fatigue life is usually classified according to the number of loading cycles into:

i. Low cycle fatigue (1≤ N≤ 1000) and for this low number of cycles, designers

sometimes ignore fatigue effects and just use static failure analysis.

ii. High cycle fatigue (N > 103):

➢ Finite life: from 103 → 106 cycles
➢ Infinite life: more than 106 cycles

There are three major fatigue life methods where each is more accurate for some types of loading
or for some materials. The three methods are: the stress-life method, the strain-life method, the
linear-elastic fracture mechanics method.

Stress-life method:

➢ Based on stress levels only

➢ Least accurate approach, especially for low-cycle applications.
➢ However, it is the most traditional method, since it is the easiest to implement for a wide
range of design applications, has ample supporting data, and represents high-cycle
applications adequately.
Strain-life method:

➢ Involves more detailed analysis of the plastic deformation at localized regions

➢ The stresses and strains are considered for life estimates.
➢ This method is especially good for low-cycle fatigue applications.
➢ In applying this method, several idealizations must be compounded, and so some
uncertainties will exist in the results.

Linear-elastic fracture mechanics:

➢ Assumes a crack is already present and detected.

➢ Predicts crack growth with respect to stress intensity.
➢ Most practical when applied to large structures in conjunction with computer codes and a
periodic inspection program.

The Stress-Life Method

➢ The stress-life relation is obtained experimentally using R. R. Moore high-speed rotating
beam test (Figure 6-9)
➢ The test is conducted by subjecting the rotating beam to a pure bending moment (of a
fixed known magnitude) until failure occurs. (Due to rotation, the specimen is subjected to
an alternating bending stress)
➢ The data obtained from the tests is used to generate the Fatigue strength, Sf vs. Number
of stress cycles, N diagram which is known as the S-N diagram (Figure 6-10).
➢ The first point is the ultimate strength which corresponds to failure in half a cycle.
➢ The alternating stress amplitude is reduced below the ultimate strength and the test is run
until failure. The stress level and the number of cycles until failure give a data point on the
chart.
➢ The testing continues and each time the stress amplitude is reduced (such that the specimen
will live longer) and new point is obtained.
➢ For steel alloys the low-cycle fatigue and the high-cycle fatigue (finite and infinite) can be
recognized as having different slopes. (they are straight lines but keep in mind it is a log-
log curve).
➢ For steels if we keep reducing the stress amplitude (for each test) we will reach to a stress
level for which the specimen will never fail, and this value of stress is known as the
Endurance Limit (Se).
➢ The number of stress cycles associated with the Endurance Limit defines the boundary
between Finite-life and Infinite-life, and it is usually between 106 to 107 cycles.
➢ Steel and Titanium alloys have a clear endurance limit, but this is not true for all materials.
For instance, Aluminum alloys do not have an endurance limit and for such materials
the fatigue strength is reported at 5(108) cycles. Also, most polymers do not have an
endurance limit (Figure 6-11).
 ➢ The endurance limits for various classes of cast irons, polished or machined, are given in
Table A–24. Aluminum alloys do not have an endurance limit. The fatigue strengths of
some aluminum alloys at 5(108) cycles of reversed stress are given in Table A–24 (See
page 1054).

The Endurance Limit

The determination of the endurance limit is important for designing machine elements that are
subjected to High-cycle fatigue. The common practice when designing such elements is to make
sure that the fatigue stress level in the element is below the endurance limit of the material
being used.

Finding the Endurance Limit using the rotating beam experiment is time consuming where it
requires testing many samples and the time for each test is relatively long. Therefore, we try to
relate the endurance limit to other mechanical properties which are easier to find (such as the
ultimate tensile strength).

The prime (‘) is used to denote that this is the endurance limit value obtained for the test specimen
(modifications are still needed).
Endurance Limit Modifications Factors
Endurance limit is obtained from the rotating beam test. The test is conducted under closely
controlled conditions (polished specimen of small size at a constant known temperature, etc.). It is
not realistic to expect a machine element to have the exact same endurance limit value as that
obtained from the rotating beam test because it has different conditions (size, surface finish,
manufacturing process, environment, etc.)

Thus, some modification factors are used to correlate the endurance limit for a given mechanical
element to the value obtained from tests:
Fatigue Strength

Approximation of the S-N diagram in the high-cycle region can be found by the following
equations which is known as S-N Equations.

Where Fatigue strength fraction, f, can be found from Figure 6-18 for 70 ≤ 𝑆𝑢𝑡 ≤ 200 𝑘𝑝𝑠𝑖. For
𝑆𝑢𝑡 < 70, 𝑓 = 0.9.
Note that the typical S-N diagram, and S-N equations are only applicable for completely reversed
loading.

A completely reversing or cyclic stress

means when the stress alternates between
equal positive and negative peak stresses
sinusoidally during each cycle of operation,
as shown. In this diagram the stress varies
with time between +250 MPa
to -250MPa

Practice Example 6-2.

Endurance Limit Modifying Factors

Surface Condition Factor (ka)

The rotating-beam test specimens are highly polished. A rough surface finish will reduce the
endurance limit because there will be a higher potential for crack initiation.

• The surface condition modification factor depends on the surface finish of the part (ground,
machined, as forged, etc.) and on the tensile strength of the material. It is given as:

Size Factor (kb)

The rotating-beam specimens have a specific (small) diameter (7.6mm). Parts of larger size are
more likely to contain flaws and to have more non-homogeneities.

When a member with circular cross-section is not rotating, we use an effective diameter value
instead of the actual diameter, where:
 𝑑𝑒 = 0.37𝑑

For other cross-sections, 𝑑𝑒 is found using Table 6-3. Use eqn. 6-23 and eqn. 6-24 to solve for 𝑑𝑒
in case 𝑑𝑒 formula is not given.

Loading Factor (kc)

The rotating-beam specimen is loaded in bending. Other types of loading will have a different
effect.

kc = 1 when torsion is combined with other loading type.

Temperature Factor (kd)

When the operating temperature is below room temperature, the material becomes more brittle.
When the temperature is high the yield strength decreases and the material becomes more ductile.

For steel, the temperature factor is given as:

**The same values calculated by the equation are also given in Table 6-4 where:
𝑆𝑇
𝑘𝑑 = ( )
𝑆𝑅𝑇
**

Reliability Factor (ke)

Miscellaneous-Effects Factor (kf)

It is used to account for the reduction of endurance limit due to all other effects (such as residual
stress, corrosion, cyclic frequency, metal spraying, etc.).
However, those effects are not fully characterized and usually not accounted for. Thus, we use (kf
= 1).

Stress Concentration and Notch Sensitivity

➢ In the development of the basic stress equations for tension, compression, bending, and
torsion, it was assumed that no geometric irregularities occurred in the member under
consideration.
➢ However, it is quite not possible to design a machine without permitting some changes in
the cross sections of the members.
➢ For example, Rotating shafts must have shoulders designed on them so that the bearings
can be properly seated, shafts must have key slots machined into them for securing pulleys
and gears etc.
➢ Any discontinuity in a machine part alters the stress distribution in the neighborhood of the
discontinuity.
➢ Such discontinuities are called stress raisers, and the regions in which they occur are called
areas of stress concentration.
➢ A theoretical, or geometric, stress-concentration factor Kt or Kts is used to relate the actual
maximum stress at the discontinuity to the nominal stress. The factors are defined by the
equations,

The nominal stress 𝜎0 𝑜𝑟 𝜏0 is the stress calculated by using the elementary stress equations
and the net area, or net cross section.

For materials under fatigue loading, the maximum stress near a notch (hole, fillet, etc.) is:

Where,
𝜎0 : is the nominal stress
kf : is the fatigue stress concentration factor which is a reduced value of the stress concentration
factor (kt) because of the difference in material sensitivity to the presence of notches.
and kf is defined as:
Notch sensitivity (q) is defined as:

Thus,

For Steels and Aluminum (2024) the notch sensitivity for Bending and Axial loading can be
found from Figure 6-20 and for Torsion is found from Figure 6-21.

Alternatively, instead of using the figures, the fatigue stress concentration factor 𝐾f, can be
found as (The Neuber equation):
 ➢ For cast iron, the notch sensitivity is very low from 0 to 0.2, but to be conservative it is
recommended to use q = 0.2
➢ For simple loading, 𝐾f can be multiplied by the stress value.
➢ However, for combined loading each type of stress has to be multiplied by its
corresponding 𝐾f value.

Practice Example 6-6, 6-7, 6-8, 6-9.