MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose The One Alternative That Best Completes The Statement or Answers The Question
MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose The One Alternative That Best Completes The Statement or Answers The Question
Test 10 - Game Theory
Name___________________________________
Group __________________
MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.
1) In the spring of 1994, Northwest Airlines took the independent action of reducing fares on its 1)
flights. Other competing airlines quickly matched the fare cuts. These actions might be
interpreted as:
A) a cooperative game. B) a competitive game.
C) a constant sum game. D) a noncooperative game.
2) Which of the following are examples of cooperative games? 2)
A) independent action by two firms in a market regarding advertising strategies
B) team games (such as baseball or basketball).
C) the bargaining between a buyer and seller over the price of a car
D) independent pricing strategies by two firms in a market
E) independent pricing strategies by many firms in a market
Scenario 2:
3) In the game in Scenario 2, the equilibrium strategies 3)
A) does not exist in pure strategies.
B) is for ABC to offer a rebate, and XYZ not to offer a rebate.
C) is for XYZ to offer a rebate, and ABC not to offer a rebate.
D) are for both firms to offer no rebate.
E) are for both firms to offer rebates.
Scenario 3
Consider the following game:
4) Which of the following is true for the game in Scenario 3? 4)
A) Zportʹs dominant strategy is the low-profile tires.
B) Neither company has a dominant strategy.
C) Zportʹs dominant strategy is the sun roof.
D) Motoʹs dominant strategy is the free maintenance.
E) Motoʹs dominant strategy is the CD changer.
5) In the game in Scenario 3, equilibrium 5)
A) is for Moto to offer free maintenance and Zport to offer low-profile tires.
B) is for Moto to offer a CD changer and Zport to offer low-profile tires.
C) is for Moto to offer a CD changer and Zport to offer a sun roof.
D) is for Moto to offer free maintenance and Zport to offer a sunroof.
E) does not exist in pure strategies.
Scenario 5
Consider the following game:
6) In the game in Scenario 5, 6)
A) all four outcomes are equilibria.
B) there is one equilibrium: for both to expand West.
C) there is only a mixed strategies equilibrium.
D) there are two equilibria: either can expand in the West, and the other expands in the South.
E) there is one equilibrium: for both to expand South.
2
Scenario 6
Consider the following game: Payoffs are in millions of dollars.
7) In the game in Scenario 6, what is the Nash equilibrium? 7)
A) The strategy pair associated with -$100, -$1.
B) The strategy pair associated with $1, -$1.
C) The strategy pair associated with $2, -$.5.
D) There is no Nash equilibrium in pure strategies.
E) The strategy pair associated with -$.5, -$.5.
8) In the game in Scenario 6, 8)
A) No firm has a dominant strategy.
B) ʺTurboTechʺ is a dominant strategy for ERS Co.
C) ʺZamboniTechʺ is a dominant strategy for ERS Co.
D) ʺDumpʺ is a dominant strategy for Lawrence LLP.
E) ʺPoison Pillʺ is a dominant strategy for Lawrence LLP.
Scenario 7:
Consider the game below about funding and construction of a dam to protect a 1,000 -person town. Contributions to the
Dam Fund, once made, cannot be recovered, and all citizens must contribute $1000 to the dam in order for it to be built. The
dam, if built, is worth $70,000 to each citizen.
9) In the game in Scenario 7, the strategy pair that pays 9)
A) $69,000 to each player is the only equilibrium.
B) $69,000 to each player and the strategy pair that pays $0 to each player are equilibria.
C) (-$1000, $0) is the only equilibrium.
D) $0 to each player is the only equilibrium.
E) ($0, -$1000) is the only equilibrium.
3
Scenario 8
Consider the following game:
Scenario 9
Consider the following game:
It costs each firm lakeside $1,500 per period to use filters that avoid polluting the lake. However, each firm must use the
lakeʹs water in production, so it is also costly to have a polluted lake. The cost to each firm of dealing with water from a
polluted lake is $1000 times the number of polluting firms.
4
13) In a Nash equilibrium, 13)
A) the player with the dominant strategy will win.
B) at least one player has a dominant strategy.
C) no players have a dominant strategy.
D) each player has a dominant strategy.
E) players may or may not have dominant strategies.
Scenario 10
Consider the game below:
5
Scenario 11
Consider the game below:
Scenario 13
Consider the game below:
6
Scenario 14
Consider the game below:
7
ESSAY. Write your answer in the space provided or on a separate sheet of paper.
24) BuyRight is a chain of grocery stores operating in small cities throughout the southwestern United States.
BuyRightʹs major competition comes from another chain, Acme Food Stores. Both firms are currently
contemplating their advertising strategy for the region. The possible outcomes are illustrated by the payoff
matrix below.
Entries in the payoff matrix are profits. BuyRightʹs profit is before the comma, Acmeʹs is after the comma.
a. Describe what is meant by a dominant strategy.
b. Given the payoff matrix above, does each firm have a dominant strategy?
c. Under what circumstances would there be no dominant strategy for one
or both firms?
25) The widget market is controlled by two firms: Acme Widget Company and Widgetway Manufacturing. The
structure of the market makes secret price cutting impossible. Each firm announces a price at the beginning of
the time period and sells widgets at the price for the duration of the period. There is very little brand loyalty
among widget buyers so that each firmʹs demand is highly elastic. Each firmʹs prices are thus very sensitive to
inter-firm price differentials. The two firms must choose between a high and low price strategy for the coming
period. Profits (measured in thousands of dollars) for the two firms under each price strategy are given in the
payoff matrix below. Widgetwayʹs profit is before the comma, Acmeʹs is after the comma.
a. Does either firm have a dominant strategy? What strategy should each firm follow?
b. Assume that the game is to be played an infinite number of times.
(Or, equivalently, imagine that neither firm knows for certain when rounds
of the game will end, so there is always a positive chance that another round
is to be played after the present one.) Would the tit-for-tat strategy would
be a reasonable choice? Explain this strategy.
c. Assume that the game is to be played a very large (but finite) number of times.
What is the appropriate strategy if both firms are always rational?
8
Answer Key
Testname: GAME THEORY
1) D
2) C
3) E
4) A
5) B
6) D
7) C
8) D
9) B
10) E
11) A
12) C
13) E
14) B
15) A
16) E
17) E
18) E
19) B
20) B
21) C
22) B
23) C
24) a.
A dominant strategy is one that is optimal regardless of the rival strategy.
b.
For both firms, the dominant strategy is to increase advertising.
If Acme increases advertising, Buy-Right earns 20 by increasing, 2 by not increasing. Profit is higher for Buy-Right
by increasing, regardless of Acmeʹs choice. The same can be shown to be true for Acme.
c.
Either or both firms would not have a dominant strategy if their best choice depended on the choice of their rival.
25) a.
Each firmʹs dominant strategy is the low price. This follows from the realization that each player is better off with the
low price strategy regardless of the opponentʹs strategy.
b.
With an infinite number of trials, a tit-for-tat strategy is appropriate. Under tit-for-tat, each player chooses the high
price so long as his rival cooperates by also choosing the high price. Once the rival cuts prices, the other player
retaliates. If the rival raises price back to the high price, the firm follows suit.
c.
A finite number of periods implies a low price for every period. The process begins when each player realizes its
opponent cannot retaliate after the last period so that the low price is rational for the last period. This in turn makes
the low price rational for the next to last period and so on.