Group Assignment 202009
Group Assignment 202009
Course Objectives:
Competencies
Critical Thinking
Effective Communication
Knowledge Integration
Social Responsibility
The objective of this course is to provide the student the opportunity to hone their skills in corporate
financial decision making through the use of case study analysis. Topics examined will include working
capital management; cash budgeting and forecasting; short-term financing; long-term financing
strategies and financial innovation; the cost of capital and capital budgeting; and mergers, acquisitions,
divestitures and corporate control. Underlying themes include valuation, financial analysis, risk
management and general management principles.
A great deal of emphasis will be placed upon analytical skills, the use of persuasive argument and
communicating advice, decisions and action plans. Hence, a significant portion of evaluation will be
based on class participation and the professional presentation of reports.
Performance Evaluation:
Cases Study 1 : (Group) 30%
Presentation (Group) 10%
Assignment 2 : Individual 20%
Final Exam /Case Study 40%
Total 100%
Online Assignments:
Exercises are made available on your students LMS. Extensions will not be given for reasons other than
illness or injury (confirmed in writing by a physician) or immediate family tragedy (with appropriate
documentation). Exceptions will not be made to accommodate vacation plans, work schedules, or
conflicts with other courses. Students are expected to conform with City University Code of Conduct and
ensure that NO plagiarism. Turnit-in will be checked and score must be below 20%.
Presentation (10%)
Group - Your group will make a make 30-minute presentation at the start of class for the cases that your
group is assigned. The presentation will consist of a synopsis of your recommendations and analysis. An
effective model of a good presentation would be about 10 minutes orally presenting your Executive
Summary with about 20 minutes of highlighting the key aspects of your analysis. Excessive length or
brevity will be penalized.
REQUIREMENT:
SECTION A
You are given a case study which is related to the topic of Finance.
Print the whole journal and make sure you highlight on all the theories found. It could be
one theory or some journal articles have more than one theory. In case you found more than
one theory, highlight ALL the theories.
SECTION B.
From the theory/ies you found above, write a NOT MORE than 10 pages on the article. It must contains
the below information:
a) Abstract e) Result and findings
b) Objective of research f) Conclusion
c) Methodology g) Future Research
d) Introduction h) References
Cases are to be written with the same care and attention as any professional business report. The
presentation should be clean, neat and concise, without grammatical or spelling errors. Contents of a
case report are expected to be:
1. Title page (Case Title, Your Name & SID, My Name and Date of Submission)
2. Table of content
3. Abstract*
4. Objective of research
5. Methodology
6. Body of the report *
7. Results and Findings
8. Conclusion
9. Future research
10. References
11. A separator page with “Appendices”
12. Appendices. (SECTION A)
Abstract*
An executive summary is a document that provides the reader with a quick overview of what is
contained in the ensuing report. It is a document that an executive will read before passing the entire
report on to an underling to review in detail. For a presentation or analysis of this magnitude, it will not
exceed one (1) page double-spaced. You may assume that the reader is familiar with the facts of the
case. In one paragraph, you will explain what was analyzed, what techniques were used, and what
alternatives were explored.
Body of Report*
The body of the case will be no longer than 10 (10) pages, typed, double-spaced. The usual headings will
be:
1. Situational Case Analysis
2. Alternatives, including the analysis of these alternatives.
3. Result and Finding
The situational analysis deals with the problem(s) in the case and the situation surrounding the case. It
should help the analyst and reader arrive at the alternative actions that could be followed. When
presenting the alternatives, some prefer to list the alternatives first and then analyze them; others
prefer to analyze each alternative as presented. I am indifferent. Do not include significant amounts of
data, large tables, etc. in the body of the case, instead relegate these to the Appendices. The
recommendation should follow from the analysis: The recommended alternative will be one of the
alternatives analyzed. You should be as practical as possible suggesting an implementation of the
recommendation.
Appendices
As you will not clutter the body of the case with numerical analyses and, data, these will appear after the
body in a well-organized and labelled appendix. Graphs, tables and, maps must be self-explanatory.
They are of little use to the reader if they need you to explain them line-by-line. Every appendix must
have a purpose, and must be referenced in the analysis. Do not reproduce case Exhibits from the book;
simply refer to them. Exhibits will be understood to refer to the exhibits in the case, whereas
Appendices will be understood to refer to the addenda that you create as part of your analysis.