Solutions to Exercises A

Solution 1: Symbolic connectives

6
1. (a) 8
≠ 34
12
(b) 16
= 68
= 34 , that is ‘ 12
16
= 6
8
and 6
8
= 34 ’.
Only (b) is true.
2. r ∧ s
3. p is ‘Two is a prime number ’
q is ‘Two is an even number ’
p∨q

Solution 2: Arithmetic operators

1. 3 + 1 + 4 or, more accurately, 3 + (1 + 4). Left operand = 3 and right

operand = 5 so result = 3 + 5 = 8.
2. (2 + 3) − (7 − 5) = 5 − 2 = 3 but (7 − 5) − (2 + 3) = 2 − 5 = −3, which is
different.

Solution 3: Conjunction

1. ‘My cat is black but your cat is white’

‘My cat is black’ ∧ ‘Your cat is white’ =T F ∧ F =T F
2. ‘Shakespeare wrote both Hamlet and MacBeth’
‘Shakespeare wrote Hamlet ’ ∧ ‘Shakespeare wrote MacBeth’ =T T ∧ T =T T
3. q ∧ p =T T ∧ F =T F
4. 2 × 7 = 27 ∧ 32 = 9
=T F ∧ T =T F
5. 3 > 2 ∧ 3 > 2 =T T ∧ T =T T

217
218 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 4: Negation

1. ‘The moon is not made of blue cheese’ =T ¬F =T T .

2. ‘1234 is an not even number ’ =T ¬T =T F .
Note that ‘1234 is an odd number ’ would be incorrect answer to this ques-
tion as it depends upon the additional fact that an odd number is one
which is not even.

Solution 5: Disjunction

1. ‘Either you broke the window or else I’m a Martian’ =T F ∨ F =T F .

Note that in general use this is just a more emphatic way of saying ‘you
broke the window’.
2. ‘Either Shakespeare or Francis Bacon wrote Hamlet ’ =T T ∨ F =T T .
3. r1 ∨ r2 =T F ∨ T =T T
4. ‘Either 2 is even or 3 is odd’ =T T ∨ T =T T

Solution 6: Connective schemas

1. (a) ‘Rex does not have a wet nose’

(b) 2+3≠ 8
(c) ¬p
(d) ¬q
(e) ¬r2
(f) ‘Rex is black but Rover is white’
(g) ‘Either 2 + 3 = 8 or 32 = 9’
(h) p∧q
(i) p1 ∧ p2
(j) r2 ∨ q
2. The following are possible answers. Note how some of the meaning of the
original may be lost.
(a) P ∧ Q where
• P is interpreted as ‘This book is long ’;
• Q is interpreted as ‘I read it quickly ’.
(b) P ∨ Q where
• P is ‘There is a hole in the exhaust ’
• Q is ‘A bracket has worked loose’.
(c) P ∨ Q where
• P is ‘Lunch will be served during the flight ’.
• Q is ‘Dinner will be served during the flight ’.
(d) ¬P where P is 3 × 6 = 7
A Solutions to Exercises 219

Solution 7: Instantiation to compound propositions

1. ¬¬‘Rover is a brave dog ’

2. 2 ≤ 3 ∧ 22 ≤ 32 ∨ 2 ≥ 3 ∧ 22 ≥ 32
3. p1 ∧ ¬p2 ∧ ¬p3 ∧ p4 , though strictly speaking this should be written as
(p1 ∧ ¬p2 ) ∧ (¬p3 ∧ p4 ) – see sections 2.9–2.12.

Solution 8: Constructing parse trees

Main connectives are shown in bold.
220 A Solutions to Exercises

5. ¬((p ∨ q) ∧ r )

6. ((¬p) ∧ (¬q)) ∨ (¬r )

Solution 9: Compound propositions from parse trees

1. q ∧ (p ∧ r )

2. ¬¬(p ∧ q)

Solution 10: Connective priorities

1. (a) ¬(¬p)
(b) (¬p) ∧ q
(c) q ∧ (¬r )
(d) (¬p) ∨ q
(e) (p ∧ q) ∧ (¬r )
(f) (p ∨ q) ∨ (¬r )
(g) (q ∧ (¬p)) ∨ q
(h) (p1 ∨ p2 ) ∨ (¬p3 )
(i) 3 > 0 ∨ ((¬ 1 + 1 = 2) ∧ 2 + 3 = 5)
(j) (¬‘Fido has three legs’) ∨ ‘Rex has four legs’
(k) (p ∧ q) ∨ ((¬r ) ∧ p)
(l) (¬p) ∧ ((¬q) ∨ (p ∧ r ))
(m) ¬(¬((¬p2 ) ∧ (¬p1 )))
A Solutions to Exercises 221

2. The main connective is shown in bold.

(a) ¬(p1 ∧ p2 ) ∨ p3
(b) ‘Rex has four legs’ ∨ ‘Fido has three legs’ ∨ ¬‘Rover has a wet nose’
(c) ¬ ¬q
(d) ¬ 1 + 1 = 2 ∨ (1 + 1)2 = 22
(e) ¬(p ∨ q ∧ r ∨ ¬s)
(f) ¬(¬(¬p1 ∨ p2 ∧ p3 ) ∨ ¬p4 ) ∧ ¬(p5 ∧ p6 ∨ ¬¬p7 )

Solution 11: Removing parentheses

1. ¬p ∨ q

2. p1 ∨ ¬p2 ∨ p3

3. p ∧ ¬q ∨ ¬r

4. ¬q1 ∧ (q1 ∨ q2 ) ∨ q1 ∧ q2 ,
though perhaps ¬q1 ∧ (q1 ∨ q2 ) ∨ (q1 ∧ q2 ) is easier to read

5. r ∧ (¬p ∨ q)

Solution 12: Truth values of compound propositions

1. ¬(¬T ) =T ¬F =T T

2. ¬T ∨ F =T F ∨ F =T F

3. (F ∨ F ) ∨ F =T F ∨ F =T F

4. ¬¬(T ∨ ¬F ) ∧ ¬(F ∨ F )
=T ¬¬(T ∨ T ) ∧ ¬F
=T ¬¬T ∧ T
=T ¬F ∧ T
=T T ∧ T
=T T

5. ¬F ∨ T =T T ∨ T =T T

6. ¬F ∧ (T ∨ ¬T ) =T T ∧ (T ∨ F ) =T T ∧ T =T T

Solution 13: Compound propositions from propositional forms

1. ‘Rex has four legs and either Fido has three legs or Rover does not have a
wet nose.’

2. (a) ‘It is not cold but it is snowing.’

(b) ‘Either the water pump is not working or there is no anti-freeze in the
radiator and last night was very cold.’
222 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 14: Propositional forms for compound propositions

Note that the choice of schematic letters is not unique.

1. One possible answer is: ¬P ∧ ¬Q , P ∧ ¬Q , ¬P ∧ Q , P ∧ Q , P

Another possibility is: ¬P1 ∧ ¬P2 , Q1 ∧ ¬P2 , ¬P1 ∧ Q2 , Q1 ∧ Q2 , R
In the first answer, occurrences of a schematic letter in one propositional
form would not always be instantiated to the same proposition as occur-
rences of the same letter in another propositional form in the list: thus
the schematic letter P in the propositional form ¬P ∧ ¬Q would need to
be instantiated to ‘The sun is made of gold’ whereas in P ∧ ¬Q it would
need to be instantiated to ‘The sun is not made of gold’. In the second
answer, however, all occurrences of a schematic letter would need to be
instantiated to the same proposition wherever it occurred in the list: thus
P1 would always need to be instantiated to ‘The sun is made of gold’.
2. One possible answer is: (P ∧ Q) ∨ R , P ∨ R , P
Another possibility is: (P1 ∧ P2 ) ∨ P3 , Q1 ∨ P3 , R1
3. One possible answer is: ¬P ∨ Q , P ∨ Q , P
Another possibility is: ¬P1 ∨ P2 , Q1 ∨ P2 , R1
4. (P1 ∧ P2 ) ∧ (P3 ∧ P4 ) , Q1 ∧ (P3 ∧ P4 ) , (P1 ∧ P2 ) ∧ Q2 , Q1 ∧ Q2 , R1 or
(P ∧ Q) ∧ (R ∧ S) , P ∧ (R ∧ S) , (P ∧ Q) ∧ R , P ∧ R , P
5. P ∨ ¬P P ∨ Q R or
P ∨ ¬P P ∨ Q P
6. (P1 ∧ ¬P2 ) ∨ (¬P1 ∧ P2 ) , (P1 ∧ Q2 ) ∨ (¬P1 ∧ P2 ) , (P1 ∧ ¬P2 ) ∨ (Q1 ∧ P2 ) ,
(P1 ∧ Q2 ) ∨ (Q1 ∧ P2 ) , R1 ∨ (Q1 ∧ P2 ) , (P1 ∧ Q2 ) ∨ R2 , R1 ∨ R2 , S1
or
(P∧¬Q)∨(¬P∧Q) (P∧R)∨(¬P∧Q) (P∧¬Q)∨(S∧Q) (P∧R)∨(S∧Q)
P ∨ (S ∧ Q) (P ∧ R) ∨ Q P ∨ Q P
Notice care must be taken over the choice of schematic letters, since the
characteristic form has repeated occurrences of the same letter. For ex-
ample: in the second answer, the propositional form (P ∧ Q) ∨ (¬P ∧ Q)
would not be correct since the letter Q would need to be instantiated to
different propositions in that one form – this is not acceptable.

Solution 15: Truth tables

1. P ¬P ¬¬P
T F T
F T F

2. P ¬P P ∨ ¬P
T F T
F T T
A Solutions to Exercises 223

3. Q ¬Q ¬¬Q ¬¬¬Q
T F T F
F T F T

4. P Q ¬Q P ∨ ¬Q ¬(P ∨ ¬Q)
T T F T F
T F T T F
F T F F T
F F T T F

5. P Q ¬Q P ∧ ¬Q
T T F F
T F T T
F T F F
F F T F

6. P1 P2 P3 P1 ∧ P2 (P1 ∧ P2 ) ∧ P3
T T T T T
T T F T F
T F T F F
T F F F F
F T T F F
F T F F F
F F T F F
F F F F F

7. P Q R P∧R Q ∧ (P ∧ R)
T T T T T
T T F F F
T F T T F
T F F F F
F T T F F
F T F F F
F F T F F
F F F F F
224 A Solutions to Exercises

8. P Q R P∨Q (P ∨ Q) ∨ R
T T T T T
T T F T T
T F T T T
T F F T T
F T T T T
F T F T T
F F T F T
F F F F F

9. P Q R Q∨R P ∨ (Q ∨ R)
T T T T T
T T F T T
T F T T T
T F F F T
F T T T T
F T F T T
F F T T T
F F F F F

10. P Q R P∨Q (P ∨ Q) ∧ R
T T T T T
T T F T F
T F T T T
T F F T F
F T T T T
F T F T F
F F T F F
F F F F F

11. P Q R P∧R Q∧R (P ∧ R) ∨ (Q ∧ R))

T T T T T T
T T F F F F
T F T T F T
T F F F F F
F T T F T T
F T F F F F
F F T F F F
F F F F F F
A Solutions to Exercises 225

12. Q1 Q2 Q3 Q2 ∧ Q3 Q1 ∨ (Q2 ∧ Q3 )
T T T T T
T T F F T
T F T F T
T F F F T
F T T T T
F T F F F
F F T F F
F F F F F

13. P Q R P∨Q P∨Q (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R)

T T T T T T
T T F T T T
T F T T T T
T F F T T T
F T T T T T
F T F T F F
F F T F T F
F F F F F F

14. P Q R Q∧R P ∨ (Q ∧ R) ¬(P ∨ (Q ∧ R))

T T T T T F
T T F F T F
T F T F T F
T F F F T F
F T T T T F
F T F F F T
F F T F F T
F F F F F T

15. P Q R ¬Q ¬R ¬Q ∨ ¬R ¬P ¬P ∧ (¬Q ∨ ¬R)

T T T F F F F F
T T F F T T F F
T F T T F T F F
T F F T T T F F
F T T F F F T F
F T F F T T T T
F F T T F T T T
F F F T T T T T
226 A Solutions to Exercises

16. P Q R Q∨R P ∧ (Q ∨ R) ¬(P ∧ (Q ∨ R))

T T T T T F
T T F T T F
T F T T T F
T F F F F T
F T T T F T
F T F T F T
F F T T F T
F F F F F T

17. P1 P2 P3 ¬P2 ¬P1 ¬P2 ∧ ¬P1 ¬P3 ¬P3 ∨ (¬P2 ∧ ¬P1 )

T T T F F F F F
T T F F F F T T
T F T T F F F F
T F F T F F T T
F T T F T F F F
F T F F T F T T
F F T T T T F T
F F F T T T T T

18. See Figure A.1

19. P Q R ¬P ¬Q ¬Q ∧ R ¬P ∨ (¬Q ∧ R)
T T T F F F F
T T F F F F F
T F T F T T T
T F F F T F F
F T T T F F T
F T F T F F T
F F T T T T T
F F F T T F T
 A Solutions to Exercises

¬(P ∨ (Q ∧ R)) ¬( ¬(P ∨ (Q ∧ R))

∨ ∨
P Q R Q ∧ R P ∨ (Q ∧ R) ¬(P ∨ (Q ∧ R)) Q ∨ R ¬(Q ∨ R) P ∧ ¬(Q ∨ R) (P ∧ ¬(Q ∨ R)) (P ∧ ¬(Q ∨ R)) )
T T T T T F T F F F T
T T F F T F T F F F T
T F T F T F T F F F T
T F F F T F F T T T F
F T T T T F T F F F T
F T F F F T T F F T F
F F T F F T T F F T F
F F F F F T F T F T F

Figure A.1: Solution to Exercise 15, Question 18

227
228 A Solutions to Exercises

20.

P Q R S P∧Q R∧S (P ∧ Q) ∨ (R ∧ S) ¬((P ∧ Q) ∨ (R ∧ S))

T T T T T T T F
T T T F T F T F
T T F T T F T F
T T F F T F T F
T F T T F T T F
T F T F F F F T
T F F T F F F T
T F F F F F F T
F T T T F T T F
F T T F F F F T
F T F T F F F T
F T F F F F F T
F F T T F T T F
F F T F F F F T
F F F T F F F T
F F F F F F F T

Solution 16: Well formed words

Only 1, 3 and 5 are well formed. Note that 6 has three left parentheses ‘ ( ’
but only two right parentheses ‘ ) ’.

Solution 17: Well formed expressions

Only 1, 4, 5 and 7 are well formed.

Solution 18: Tautologies

From Prop1 it follows that propositional forms 2 and 6 are tautologies.
Propositional forms 1 and 3 are also tautologies, but these do not follow dir-
ectly from Prop1. Note that in 3 the first disjunct is negation whereas in Prop1
the second disjunct is negation.

Solution 19: Contradictions

From Prop2 it follows that propositional forms 5 and 6 are contradictions.
Propositional forms 1 and 4 are also contradictions, but these do not follow
directly from Prop2. Note that propositional form 2 is the negation of a con-
tradiction and so must be a tautology.

Solution 20: Equivalence

1. b, c, d, h, i, k, l, n, p, q

2. a, c
A Solutions to Exercises 229

Solution 21: Using laws of equivalence

1. ¬P ∧ P
=T P ∧ ¬P  A ∧ B =T B ∧ A 
=T F  A ∧ ¬A =T F 

2. ¬(P ∨ ¬Q) ∨ (P ∨ ¬Q)

=T (P ∨ ¬Q) ∨ ¬(P ∨ ¬Q)  A ∨ B =T B ∨ A 
=T T  A ∨ ¬A =T T 

3. (P ∧ Q) ∨ P
=T P ∨ (P ∧ Q)  A ∨ B =T B ∨ A 
=T P  A ∨ A =T A 

4. (P ∧ Q) ∧ P
=T P ∧ (P ∧ Q)  A ∧ B =T B ∧ A 
=T (P ∧ P) ∧ Q  A ∧ (B ∧ C) =T (A ∧ B) ∧ C 
=T P ∧ Q  A ∧ A =T A 

5. (P ∨ ¬P) ∧ ¬(Q ∧ ¬Q)

=T T ∧ ¬(Q ∧ ¬Q)  A ∨ ¬A =T T 
=T ¬(Q ∧ ¬Q) ∧ T  A ∧ B =T B ∧ A 
=T ¬(Q ∧ ¬Q)  A ∧ T =T A 
=T ¬Q ∨ ¬¬Q  ¬(A ∧ B) =T ¬A ∨ ¬B 
=T ¬Q ∨ Q  ¬¬A =T A 
=T Q ∨ ¬Q  A ∨ B =T B ∨ A 
=T T  A ∨ ¬A =T T 

6. ¬T
=T ¬(P ∨ ¬P)  A ∨ ¬A =T T 
=T ¬P ∧ ¬¬P  ¬(A ∨ B) =T ¬A ∧ B 
=T ¬P ∧ P  ¬¬A =T A 
=T P ∧ ¬P  A ∧ B =T B ∧ A 
=T F  A ∧ ¬A =T F 

7. F
=T ¬¬T  Qu. 6 
=T T  ¬¬A =T A 

Note that an earlier proof has been quoted in order to avoid repeating the
steps used in that proof – the earlier proof can be viewed as a ‘subprogram’
called by the later proof.
230 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 22: Sets of propositional forms

1. Set of two propositional forms, namely P ∧ Q and ¬Q.
2. Set of two propositional forms, namely P ∧ Q and ¬Q.
3. Set of one propositional form, namely ¬Q.
4. The propositional form ¬Q.
5. Set of one truth value, namely F .
6. The truth value F .
7. General expression for a set of two propositional forms, one of which
has ∧ as the main connective and the other of which has ¬ as the main
connective.
8. General expression for a set of two propositional forms, one of which
has ∧ as the main connective and the other of which has ¬ as the main
connective.
9. General expression for a set of two propositional forms, one of which has
∨ as the main connective with F as the right disjunct and the other of
which has ∧ as the main connective with left conjunct T .
10. A propositional form with ∧ as the main connective.
11. Set of one propositional form, namely Q ∧ R.
12. Does not represent anything meaningful in our notation – it is not a well
formed expression.
13. Set containing at least one propositional form.
14. Set containing at least one propositional form; if A and B are different,
then the set contains at least two propositional forms.
15. Does not represent anything meaningful as A is not a set – it is not a well
formed expression.
16. A set with one propositional form, namely P1 ∨ ¬P2

Solution 23: Semantic entailment

1. (a) P Q P∧Q P∨Q
T T T T
T F F T
F T F T
F F F F
(b) P1 P2 ¬(P1 ∨ P2 ) ¬(P2 ∧ P1 )
T T F F
T F F T
F T F T
F F T T
A Solutions to Exercises 231

(c) P Q P ∨ ¬Q ¬P ¬Q
T T T F F
T F T F T
F T F T F
F F T T T

(d) P Q R P∧Q P ∧ (Q ∨ R)
T T T T T
T T F T T
T F T F T
T F F F F
F T T F F
F T F F F
F F T F F
F F F F F

(e) Q1 Q2 Q3 ¬Q1 ∨ Q2 ¬Q2 ∨ Q3 ¬Q1 ∨ Q3

T T T T T T
T T F T F F
T F T F T T
T F F F T F
F T T T T T
F T F T F T
F F T T T T
F F F T T T

2. If A B, then whenever B is F then A is F ; so whenever ¬B is T then ¬A

is also T ; that is, ¬B ¬A.

Solution 24: Uniform replacement

1. Replace P by ¬P and Q by ¬Q.
2. Replace P1 by P ∧ Q and P2 by Q.
3. Replace R by S.

Solution 25: Validity of argument forms

From the truth tables it can be seen that 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 15 and 17 are
valid argument forms. Note that modus ponendo tollens is not a valid argument
form.
P Q P∨Q P∧Q ¬P ¬¬P ¬P ∨ Q ¬Q
T T T T F T T F
T F T F F T F T
F T T F T F T F
F F F F T F T T
232 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 26: Validity of arguments

The characteristic argument form is given for each argument, from which
it is possible to decide whether or not the argument is valid.

1. P ∨ Q ∴ P ∧ Q (not valid).
2. P ∧ Q ∴ P ∨ Q (valid).
3. P ∧ Q ∴ P ∨ R (valid).
4. P ∧ Q ∴ P (valid).
5. P, Q ∴ P ∧ Q (valid).
6. P, Q ∴ P ∨ Q (valid).
7. P ∴ P ∨ Q (valid).
8. P ∴ Q ∨ P (valid).
9. P ∴ Q ∨ R (not valid).
10. ¬¬(P ∧ ¬Q) ∴ P ∧ ¬Q (valid). Note that it is also possible to use the fact
that ¬¬P ∴ P is a valid argument form to show that the argument itself
is valid.

Solution 27: Deduction rules

1. In each case the instances of P and Q are given together with the corres-
ponding inference form.
(a) P : p, Q : q ∨ r , P, Q  P ∧ Q .
(b) P : p, Q : q ∨ r , P ∧ Q  P .
(c) P : p, Q : q ∨ r , P ∧ Q  Q .
(d) P : ¬¬¬q, Q : p ∨ ¬¬q, P ∧ Q  Q .
(e) P : ¬¬¬q, Q : p ∨ ¬¬q, P ∧ Q  P .
(f) P : p, Q : q ∧ r , P  P ∨ Q .
(g) P : ¬q ∨ r , Q : ¬p ∨ s, Q  P ∨ Q .
(h) P : ¬p, ¬¬P  P .
(i) P : ¬¬p, ¬¬P  P .
(j) P : (p ∧ (r ∨ q)), ¬¬P  P .
(k) P : ¬¬p, P  ¬¬P .
(l) P : ¬p, P  ¬¬P .
(m) P : (p ∨ (r ∧ q)), P  ¬¬P .
2. For each question, the appropriate rule of deduction is given followed by
the necessary instantiations and then the inference form which constitutes
that rule of deduction.
(a) ∧I , P : ‘The sky is blue’, Q : ‘Grass is green’, P, Q  P ∧ Q .
(b) ∨I1 , P : p1 , Q : p2 , P  P ∨ Q .
(c) ¬¬E , P : ‘Fido has three legs’, ¬¬P  P .
(d) ∧E2 , P : ‘73 is prime’, Q : ‘73 is odd’, P ∧ Q  Q .
A Solutions to Exercises 233

(e) ¬¬I , P : ‘The sky is blue’, P  ¬¬P .

(f) ∨I1 , P : ‘71 is prime’, Q : ‘26 is prime’, P  P ∨ Q .
(g) ∨I2 , P : ‘Rex has four legs’, Q : ‘Rex has a wet nose’, Q  P ∨ Q .
(h) ∧E1 , P : r , Q : s, P ∧ Q  P .
(i) ∨I2 , P : 32 = 9 , Q : 1 + 1 = 2 ∧ 2 × 3 = 6 , Q  P ∨ Q .
(j) ¬¬E , P : ‘Roses are red’, Q : ‘Violets are blue’, ¬¬P  P .

Solution 28: Tabular derivations

1. 1 P∧Q  P ∧ E1
2 P  ¬¬P ¬¬I
3 P∧Q  ¬¬P 1, 2

2. 1 ¬¬P  P ¬¬E
2 P, Q  P∧Q ∧I
3 ¬¬P, Q  P∧Q 1, 2

3. 1 ¬¬(P ∨ Q)  P∨Q ¬¬E

2 P∨Q  (P ∨ Q) ∨ ¬¬(P ∧ Q) ∨ I1
3 ¬¬(P ∨ Q)  (P ∨ Q) ∨ ¬¬(P ∧ Q) 1, 2

4. 1 ¬¬A  A ¬¬E
2 A, B  A∧B ∧I
3 ¬¬A, B  A∧B 1, 2
4 ¬¬B  B ¬¬E
5 ¬¬A, ¬¬B  A∧B 4, 3

Solution 29: Deduction trees

1. (a)
P∧Q
∧E1
P
¬¬I
¬¬P

(b)
¬¬¬Q ∧ (P ∨ ¬¬Q)
∧E1
¬¬¬Q
¬¬E
¬Q

(c)
P∧Q
∧E1
P
∨I1
P∨Q
234 A Solutions to Exercises

(d)
¬¬(P ∨ Q) ∧ (¬Q ∧ R)
∧E1
¬¬(P ∨ Q)
¬¬E
P∨Q
∨I1
(P ∨ Q) ∨ (R ∧ S)

(e)
P
¬¬I
¬¬P Q∨R
∧I
¬¬P ∧ (Q ∨ R)

(f)
Q∧R
∧E1
Q S
∧I
Q∧S

(g)
P∧Q P∧Q
∧E2 ∧E1
Q P
∧I
Q∧P

(h)
R
∨I1
R ∨ (Q ∧ ¬P) P∨Q
∧I
(R ∨ (Q ∧ ¬P)) ∧ (P ∨ Q)

2. (a)
Q R
∧I
Q∧R
∨I2
P ∨ (Q ∧ R)

(b)
(P ∧ Q) ∧ R (P ∧ Q) ∧ R
∧E1 ∧E1
P∧Q P∧Q
∧E2 ∧E1
(P ∧ Q) ∧ R Q P
∧E2 ∧I
R Q∧P
∧I
R ∧ (Q ∧ P)

(c)
P∧Q
∧E2
Q
∨I2
¬P ∨ Q
A Solutions to Exercises 235

(d)
¬¬P ∧ Q
∧E1
¬¬P ¬¬P ∧ Q
¬¬E ∧E2
P Q
∧I
P∧Q

(e)
¬¬P ∧ ¬¬Q ¬¬P ∧ ¬¬Q
∧E1 ∧E2
¬¬P ¬¬Q
¬¬E ¬¬E
P Q
∧I
P∧Q

(f)
¬¬(P ∧ Q)
¬¬E
P∧Q
∧E2
Q
∨I2
P∨Q
¬¬I
¬¬(P ∨ Q)

or, alternatively,

¬¬(P ∧ Q)
¬¬E
P∧Q
∧E1
P
∨I1
P∨Q
¬¬I
¬¬(P ∨ Q)

(g)
¬¬(P ∧ Q)
¬¬E
P∧Q
∧E1
P
¬¬I
¬¬P
∨I1
¬¬P ∨ ¬¬Q

or, alternatively,

¬¬(P ∧ Q)
¬¬E
P∧Q
∧E2
Q
¬¬I
¬¬Q
∨I2
¬¬P ∨ ¬¬Q
236 A Solutions to Exercises

(h)
¬¬(P ∧ Q) ¬¬(P ∧ Q)
¬¬E ¬¬E
P∧Q P∧Q
∧E1 ∧E2
P Q
¬¬I ¬¬I
¬¬P ¬¬Q
∧I
¬¬P ∧ ¬¬Q

(i)
¬¬P ∧ ¬¬Q ¬¬P ∧ ¬¬Q
∧E1 ∧E2
¬¬P ¬¬Q
¬¬E ¬¬E
P Q
∧I
P∧Q
¬¬I
¬¬(P ∧ Q)

3. (a)
P∧Q
∧E1
P
∨I2
Q∧P
(b)
P ∧ ¬Q P ∧ ¬Q
∧E2 ∧E1
¬Q P
∧I
¬Q ∧ P
(c)
P Q
∧I
P∧Q
∨I2
R∨P∧Q

Solution 30: Using ¬I and ∨E

1.
∗
P∧Q
∧E2
Q ¬Q
∧I
Q ∧ ¬Q
∗¬I
¬(P ∧ Q)
2.
∗
P∧Q ¬P ∧ R
∧E1 ∧E1
P ¬P
∧I
P ∧ ¬P
∗¬I
¬(¬P ∧ R)
A Solutions to Exercises 237

3.
P ∧ ¬P P ∧ ¬P
∧E1 ∗ ∧E2 ∗
P ¬Q ¬P ¬Q
∧I ∧I
P ∧ ¬Q ¬P ∧ ¬Q
∧E1 ∧E1
P ¬P
∧I
P ∧ ¬P
∗¬I
¬¬Q
¬¬E
Q

4.
∗
Q
∗ ∨I1
P Q∨R
∨I1 ∨I2
P∨Q P ∨ (Q ∨ R) P ∨ (Q ∨ R)
∗∨E
P ∨ (Q ∨ R)

5. See Figure A.2

6. See Figure A.3

Solution 31: Theorems

1.
¬(¬P ∧ P)
∨I1
¬(¬P ∧ P) ∨ Q

2. This follows from the theorem proved in Example 4.71, both directly, and
also from its generalization:  ¬(¬A ∧ A) .

Ex. 4.71 Gen. Ex. 4.71

¬(¬P ∧ P) ¬(¬Q ∧ Q)
∧I
¬(¬P ∧ P) ∧ ¬(¬Q ∧ Q)

3.
∗
P ∧ (Q ∧ ¬P)
∗ ∧E2
P ∧ (Q ∧ ¬P) Q ∧ ¬P
∧E1 ∧E2
P ¬P
∧I
P ∧ ¬P
∗¬I
¬(P ∧ (Q ∧ ¬P))
238 A Solutions to Exercises

†∨I
∗¬I
∧I
∧E1
∧I
∗
P
¬Q ∧ P
¬Q
Q ∧ ¬Q
¬P
¬Q

†
Q

¬P
∧E1
∧I
¬Q
¬P ∧ ¬Q
¬P
†
¬P

¬P ∨ Q

Figure A.2: Solution to Exercise 30, Question 5

 A Solutions to Exercises

∗ †
¬P Q
∧I
¬P ∧ Q ¬P ∧ ¬Q
∧E2 ∧E2
Q ¬Q
∧I
Q ∧ ¬Q
∗¬I
¬P ∧ ¬Q ¬¬P ¬P ∧ ¬Q
† ∧E1 ¬¬E ∧E1
¬P P ¬P
P
‡ ∧I ∧I
P∨Q P ∧ ¬P P ∧ ¬P
†∨I
P ∧ ¬P
‡¬I
¬(P ∨ Q)

Figure A.3: Solution to Exercise 30, Question 6

239
240 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 32: Syntactic equivalence

P ¬¬P
1. ¬¬I ¬¬E
¬¬P P

2. P∧Q P∧Q
∧E2 ∧E1
Q P
∧I
Q∧P

Q∧P Q∧P
∧E2 ∧E1
P Q
∧I
P∧Q

3. ∗ ∗
P Q
∨I2 ∨I1
P∨Q Q∨P Q∨P
∗∨E
Q∨P

∗ ∗
Q P
∨I2 ∨I1
Q∨P P∨Q P∨Q
∗∨E
P∨Q

4. See Figure A.4

Solution 33: Compound propositions with the conditional connective

1. (a) ‘It will rain today ’ ⇒ ‘I shall get wet ’
(b) a = 2 ⇒ a2 = 4
(c) ‘I understand logic’ ⇒ ‘I shall become a good programmer ’
(d) ‘John will go to the party ’ ⇒ ‘Mary will go to the party ’
(e) ‘Mary will go to the party ’ ⇒ ‘John will go to the party ’
(f) (‘John will go to the party ’ ⇒ ‘Mary will go to the party ’)
∧
(‘Mary will go to the party ’ ⇒ ‘John will go to the party ’)
(g) ¬‘We shall go to the seaside tomorrow ’ ⇒ ‘My car will break down’
2. (a) ‘If you are nice to me then I will be your friend.’
(b) ‘I will be your friend only if you are nice to me.’
(c) ‘If you are not a good boy, then Father Christmas will not leave you
any presents.’
(d) ‘Father Christmas will only leave you presents if you are a good boy.’
(e) ‘If the driver displays a parking permit then he or she will be admitted
to the car park and will not be sent a reminder about parking regu-
lations, otherwise she or he will not be admitted and will be sent a
reminder.’
 ∗
Q
∗ ∨I1 †
P Q∨R R
∨I1 ∨I2
A Solutions to Exercises

† ∨I2
P ∨ (Q ∨ R) P ∨ (Q ∨ R) Q∨R
P∨Q
∗∨E ∨I2
(P ∨ Q) ∨ R P ∨ (Q ∨ R) P ∨ (Q ∨ R)
†∨E
P ∨ (Q ∨ R)

∗
Q
† ∨I2 ∗
P P∨Q R
∨I1 ∨I1 ∨I2
† (P ∨ Q) ∨ R (P ∨ Q) ∨ R
P∨Q Q
∨I1 ∗∨E
P ∨ (Q ∨ R) (P ∨ Q) ∨ R (P ∨ Q) ∨ R

Figure A.4: Solution to Exercise 32, Question 4

†∨E
(P ∨ Q) ∨ R
241
242 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 34: Truth tables and the conditional connective

1. (a) P Q ¬P ¬Q ¬P ⇒ ¬Q
T T F F T
T F F T T
F T T F F
F F T T T
(b) P Q R ¬P ¬Q ¬Q ∨ R P ⇒ (¬Q ∨ R)
T T T F F T T
T T F F F F F
T F T F T T T
T F F F T T T
F T T T F T T
F T F T F F T
F F T T T T T
F F F T T T T
(c) P Q ¬P Q∧P ¬P ⇒ (Q ∧ P) (¬P ⇒ (Q ∧ P)) ⇒ Q
T T F T T T
T F F F T F
F T T F F T
F F T F F T
2. (a) Neither
(b) Contradiction
P ¬P ¬P ⇒ P P ⇒ ¬P (P ⇒ ¬P) ∧ (¬P ⇒ P)
T F T F F
F T F T F
(c) Tautology
(d) Neither
P Q P∧Q (P ∧ Q) ⇒ P P ⇒ (P ∧ Q)
T T T T T
T F F T F
F T F T T
F F F T T
(e) Neither
(f) Tautology
P Q P∨Q (P ∨ Q) ⇒ P P ⇒ (P ∨ Q)
T T T T T
T F T T T
F T T F T
F F F T T
A Solutions to Exercises 243

(g) Contradiction
P ¬P P ∨ ¬P P ∧ ¬P (P ∨ ¬P) ⇒ (P ∧ ¬P)
T F T F F
F T T F F
(h) Tautology
P Q P⇒Q (P ⇒ Q) ∨ P
T T T T
T F F T
F T T T
F F T T
(i) Tautology
(j) Neither (See Figure A.5)
(k) Neither
P P⇒P ¬P P ⇒ ¬P (P ⇒ P) ⇒ (P ⇒ ¬P)
T T F F F
F T T T T
(l) Tautology (See Figure A.6)
3. (a) P ¬P P ⇒ ¬P
T F F
F T T
(b) P Q ¬Q P ∧ ¬Q ¬(P ∧ ¬Q) P⇒Q
T T F F T T
T F T T F F
F T F F T T
F F T F T T
(c) P Q ¬Q P⇒Q P ∧ ¬Q ¬(P ⇒ Q)
T T F T F F
T F T F T T
F T F T F F
F F T T F F
P⇒ (P ⇒ Q)∧
(d) P Q R Q∧R P⇒Q P⇒R (Q ∧ R) (P ⇒ R)
T T T T T T T T
T T F F T F F F
T F T F F T F F
T F F F F F F F
F T T T T T T T
F T F F T T T T
F F T F T T T T
F F F F T T T T
 244

P Q ¬P ¬Q ¬P ∧ ¬Q P∨Q (¬P ∧ ¬Q) ⇒ (P ∨ Q) (P ∨ Q) ⇒ (¬P ∧ ¬Q)

T T F F F T T F
T F F T F T T F
F T T F F T T F
F F T T T F T T
A

Figure A.5: Solution to Exercise 34, Question 2(j)

Solutions to Exercises
 A Solutions to Exercises

P Q P∧Q Q∧P (P ∧ Q) ⇒ (Q ∧ P) (Q ∧ P) ⇒ (P ∧ Q) ((P ∧ Q) ⇒ (Q ∧ P)) ∧ ((Q ∧ P) ⇒ (P ∧ Q))

T T T T T T T
T F F F T T T
F T F F T T T
F F F F T T T

Figure A.6: Solution to Exercise 34, Question 2(l)

245
246 A Solutions to Exercises

(e) P Q R Q⇒R P∧Q P ⇒ (Q ⇒ R) (P ∧ Q) ⇒ R

T T T T T T T
T T F F T F F
T F T T F T T
T F F T F T T
F T T T F T T
F T F F F T T
F F T T F T T
F F F T F T T

4. Either the conclusion is true when all the premisses are true, or at least one
premiss is false when the conclusion is false. If there are no premisses,
then the conclusion form must be a tautology.

(a) P P⇒P
T T
F T

(b) P Q P⇒Q ¬Q ¬P
T T T F F
T F F T F
F T T F T
F F T T T

(c) P Q Q⇒P
T T T
T F T
F T F
F F T

(d) P Q P∧Q P⇒Q

T T T T
T F F F
F T F T
F F F T
A Solutions to Exercises 247

(e) P Q R P⇒Q (P ⇒ Q) ⇒ R Q⇒R

T T T T T T
T T F T F F
T F T F T T
T F F F T T
F T T T T T
F T F T F F
F F T T T T
F F F T F T

(f) P1 P2 P3 P1 ⇒ P2 P2 ⇒ P3 P1 ⇒ P3
T T T T T T
T T F T F F
T F T F T T
T F F F T F
F T T T T T
F T F T F T
F F T T T T
F F F T T T

(g) See Figure A.7

Solution 35: Equational logic

1. (a) P ⇒ (Q ⇒ ¬P)
=T ¬P ∨ (¬Q ∨ ¬P)  A ⇒ B =T ¬A ∨ B 
=T ¬P ∨ (¬P ∨ ¬Q)  A ∨ B =T B ∨ A 
=T (¬P ∨ ¬P) ∨ ¬Q  A ∨ (B ∨ C) =T (A ∨ B) ∨ C 
=T ¬P ∨ ¬Q  A ∨ A =T A 

(b) (P ⇒ Q) ∧ (P ⇒ ¬Q)
=T P ⇒ (Q ∧ ¬Q)  A ⇒ (B ∧ C) =T (A ⇒ B) ∧ (A ⇒ C) 
=T P⇒F  A ∧ ¬A =T F 
=T ¬P  A ⇒ F =T ¬A 

(c) P ⇒ (P ⇒ Q)
=T (P ∧ P) ⇒ Q  A ⇒ (B ⇒ C) =T (A ∧ B) ⇒ C 
=T P⇒Q  A ∧ A =T A 
 248

P Q R S ¬Q ¬S R ∨ ¬S ¬Q ⇒ (R ∨ ¬S) P ∧ (¬Q ⇒ (R ∨ ¬S)) (P ∧ (¬Q ⇒ (R ∨ ¬S))) ⇒ P

T T T T F F T T T T
T T T F F T T T T T
T T F T F F F T T T
T T F F F T T T T T
T F T T T F T T T T
T F T F T T T T T T
T F F T T F F F F T
T F F F T T T T T T
F T T T F F T T F T
F T T F F T T T F T
F T F T F F F T F T
F T F F F T T T F T
F F T T T F T T F T
A

F F T F T T T T F T
F F F T T F F F F T

Figure A.7: Solution to Exercise 34, Question 4(g)

F F F F T T T T F T
Solutions to Exercises
A Solutions to Exercises 249

(d) P ⇒ (Q ⇒ P)
=T P ⇒ (¬P ⇒ ¬Q)  A ⇒ B =T ¬B ⇒ ¬A 
=T (P ∧ ¬P) ⇒ Q  A ⇒ (B ⇒ C) =T (A ∧ B) ⇒ C 
=T F ⇒ ¬Q  A ∧ ¬A =T F 
=T T  F ⇒ A =T T 

(e) (P ⇒ Q) ∨ (¬P ⇒ Q)
=T (¬Q ⇒ ¬P) ∨ (¬Q ⇒ ¬¬P)  A ⇒ B =T ¬B ⇒ ¬A 
=T ¬Q ⇒ (¬P ∨ ¬¬P)
 A ⇒ (B ∨ C) =T (A ⇒ B) ∨ (A ⇒ C) 
=T ¬Q ⇒ T  A ∨ ¬A =T T 
=T T  A ⇒ T =T T 

(f) (P ⇒ (Q ∨ ¬P)) ⇒ Q
=T (P ⇒ (¬P ∨ Q)) ⇒ Q  A ∨ B =T B ∨ A 
=T (P ⇒ (P ⇒ Q)) ⇒ Q  A ⇒ B =T ¬A ∨ B 
=T ((P ∧ P) ⇒ Q) ⇒ Q  A ⇒ (B ⇒ C) =T (A ∧ B) ⇒ C 
=T (P ⇒ Q) ⇒ Q  A ∧ A =T A 
=T T  (A ⇒ B) ⇒ B =T T 

(g) (P ⇒ (Q ∧ P)) ⇒ ¬Q
=T ((P ⇒ Q) ∧ (P ⇒ P)) ⇒ ¬Q
 A ⇒ (B ∧ C) =T (A ⇒ B) ∧ (A ⇒ C) 
=T ((P ⇒ Q) ∧ T ) ⇒ ¬Q  A ⇒ A =T T 
=T (P ⇒ Q) ⇒ ¬Q  A ∧ T =T A 
=T (¬Q ⇒ ¬P) ⇒ ¬Q  A ⇒ B =T ¬B ⇒ ¬A 
=T ¬Q  (A ⇒ B) ⇒ A =T A 

2. (a) P ⇒ (P ∨ Q)
=T (P ⇒ P) ∨ (P ⇒ Q)  A ⇒ (B ∨ C) =T (A ⇒ B) ∨ (A ⇒ C) 
=T T ∨ (P ⇒ Q)  A ⇒ A =T T 
=T (P ⇒ Q) ∨ T  A ∨ B =T B ∨ A 
=T T  A ∨ T =T T 

(b) From Qu.1(d) we know that P ⇒ (Q ⇒ P) =T T .

(c) (P ∧ Q) ⇒ (P ⇒ Q)
=T ((P ∧ Q) ∧ P) ⇒ Q  A ⇒ (B ⇒ C) =T (A ∧ B) ⇒ C 
=T (P ∧ (P ∧ Q)) ⇒ Q  A ∧ B =T B ∧ A 
=T ((P ∧ P) ∧ Q) ⇒ Q  A ∧ (B ∧ C) =T (A ∧ B) ∧ C 
=T (P ∧ Q) ⇒ Q  A ∧ A =T A 
=T P ⇒ (Q ⇒ Q)  A ⇒ (B ⇒ C) =T (A ∧ B) ⇒ C 
=T P⇒T  A ⇒ A =T T 
=T T  A ⇒ T =T T 
250 A Solutions to Exercises

(d) ¬(¬P ∨ Q) ⇒ P
=T ¬¬(¬P ∨ Q) ∨ P  A ⇒ B =T ¬A ∨ B 
=T (¬P ∨ Q) ∨ P  ¬¬A =T A 
=T P ∨ (¬P ∨ Q)  A ∨ B =T B ∨ A 
=T (P ∨ ¬P) ∨ Q  A ∨ (B ∨ C) =T (A ∨ B) ∨ C 
=T T ∨Q  A ∨ ¬A =T T 
=T Q∨T  A ∨ B =T B ∨ A 
=T T  A ∨ T =T T 

(e) ((P ∨ Q) ⇒ Q) ⇒ (P ⇒ Q)
=T ((P ⇒ Q) ∧ (Q ⇒ Q)) ⇒ (P ⇒ Q)
 (A ∨ B) ⇒ C =T (A ⇒ C) ∧ (B ⇒ C) 
=T ((P ⇒ Q) ∧ T ) ⇒ (P ⇒ Q)  A ⇒ A =T T 
=T (P ⇒ Q) ⇒ (P ⇒ Q)  A ∧ T =T A 
=T T  A ⇒ A =T T 

(f) ((P ⇒ Q) ∧ ¬Q) ⇒ ¬P

=T ¬((¬P ∨ Q) ∧ ¬Q) ∨ ¬P  A ⇒ B =T ¬A ∨ B 
=T (¬(¬P ∨ Q) ∨ ¬¬Q) ∨ ¬P  ¬(A ∧ B) =T ¬A ∨ ¬B 
=T ((¬¬P ∧ ¬Q) ∨ ¬¬Q) ∨ ¬P  ¬(A ∨ B) =T ¬A ∧ ¬B 
=T ((P ∧ ¬Q) ∨ Q) ∨ ¬P  ¬¬A =T A 
=T (Q ∨ (P ∧ ¬Q)) ∨ ¬P  A ∨ B =T B ∨ A 
=T ((Q ∨ P) ∧ (Q ∨ ¬Q)) ∨ ¬P
 A ∨ (B ∨ C) =T (A ∨ B) ∨ C 
=T ((Q ∨ P) ∧ T ) ∨ ¬P  A ∨ ¬A =T T 
=T (Q ∨ P) ∨ ¬P  A ∧ T =T A 
=T Q ∨ (P ∨ ¬P)
 A ∨ (B ∨ C) =T (A ∨ B) ∨ C 
=T Q∨T  A ∨ ¬A =T T 
=T T  A ∨ T =T T 

Solution 36: Deductions using ¬, ∧ and ∨ rules

1. ¬¬(P ⇒ (R ∨ Q))
¬¬E
P ⇒ (R ∨ Q)
¬¬¬Q ∧ (P ⇒ ¬¬Q)
2. ∧E2
P ⇒ ¬¬Q
P
3. ∨I1
P ∨ (Q ⇒ R)
¬P ∨ S
4. ∨I2
(Q ⇒ R) ∨ (¬P ∨ S)
A Solutions to Exercises 251

5. ¬¬¬Q ∧ (P ⇒ ¬¬Q)
∧E1
¬¬¬Q
¬¬E
¬Q

6. ¬¬(P ⇒ Q) ∧ (¬Q ⇒ R)
∧E1
¬¬(P ⇒ Q)
¬¬E
P⇒Q
∨I1
(P ⇒ Q) ∨ (R ∧ S)

Solution 37: Deductions using the ⇒ E rule

1.
¬P ¬P ⇒ Q
⇒E
Q

2.
¬¬P
¬¬E
P P⇒Q
⇒E
Q

3.
P P ⇒ (P ∧ Q)
⇒E
P∧Q
∧E2
Q

4.
P P ⇒ (P ⇒ Q)
⇒E
P⇒Q P
⇒E
Q

5.
P∧Q
∧E2
Q Q⇒R
⇒E
R

6. ∗
P ∧ ¬Q
∧E1 ∗
P P⇒Q P ∧ ¬Q
⇒E ∧E2
Q ¬Q
∧I
Q ∧ ¬Q
∗¬I
¬(P ∧ ¬Q)
252 A Solutions to Exercises

7. The deduction tree is very similar to that of the previous example except
that the ¬I rule is applied to yield ¬(P ⇒ Q) rather than ¬(P ∧ ¬Q)

P ∧ ¬Q
∧E1 ∗
P P⇒Q P ∧ ¬Q
⇒E ∧E2
Q ¬Q
∧I
Q ∧ ¬Q
∗¬I
¬(P ⇒ Q)

8. ∗ ∗
P P⇒R Q Q⇒R
⇒E ⇒E
P∨Q R R
∗∨E
R

9. See Figure A.8

Solution 38: Using ⇒ I

1. ∗
¬¬P
¬¬E
P
∗⇒I
¬¬P ⇒ P

2. ∗
P∧R
∧E2
R
∨I1
R∨Q
∗⇒I
(P ∧ R) ⇒ (R ∨ Q)

3. ∗
P P⇒Q
⇒E
Q
∗⇒I
(P ⇒ Q) ⇒ Q

4. ∗
P P⇒Q
⇒E
Q Q⇒R
⇒E
R
∗⇒I
P⇒R
 A Solutions to Exercises

∗ †
P ∧ ¬R ¬Q ¬Q ⇒ R
∧E2 ⇒E
¬R R
∧I
P ∧ ¬R R ∧ ¬R
∧E1 † ∗¬I
P P⇒Q ¬¬Q
⇒E ¬¬E
(P ⇒ Q) ∨ (¬Q ⇒ R) Q Q
†∨E
Q

Figure A.8: Solution to Exercise 37, Question 9

253
254 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 39: Derived rules of deduction – MT and HS

1. (a) P ⇒ ¬Q ¬¬Q
MT
¬P

(b) Q
¬¬I
P ⇒ ¬Q ¬¬Q
MT
¬P

(c) ¬P ⇒ Q ¬Q
MT
¬¬P
¬¬E
P

(d) P⇒Q ¬Q
MT
¬P
∨I1
¬P ∨ Q

(e) P ⇒ (Q ∧ R) ¬(Q ∧ R)
MT
¬P
∨I2
¬P ∨ S

2. (a) P⇒Q Q⇒R

HS
P P⇒R
⇒E
R

(b) ¬P ⇒ ¬Q ¬Q ⇒ R
HS
¬P ⇒ R ¬R
MT
¬¬P
¬¬E
P

Solution 40: Predicates from propositions

1. ‘ . . . is red’, flowers. The predicate represents the property that the sub-
ject is red.
2. ‘ . . . is a perfect square’, integers (‘integer’ is another name for ‘whole
number’). The property represents the property that the subject is a per-
fect square, that is it is equal to the square of an integer.Note that although
numbers would also be a possibility, the concept of a perfect square usu-
ally arises when we are are talking about integers, or, even more specific-
ally, non-negative integers.
A Solutions to Exercises 255

3. ‘ . . . has brown hair ’, people. Again, there are other possibilities; dogs for
example. In a textbook question such as this, we are working in the ab-
stract somewhat; in a real situation, an appropriate universe of discourse
would be much clearer to identify.
4. ‘ . . . are yellow ’, species of flowers. Care needs to be taken in choosing
an appropriate universe of discourse. The subject ‘Daffodils’ refers to the
collection of all daffodils, not just one particular daffodil. The predicate
represents the property that each member of the subject is yellow.

Solution 41: Unary predicates

1. (a) 3 > 2.
(b) 1 > 2.
(c) 6 = 6.
(d) ‘Sydney is the capital of Australia’.
(e) ‘Canberra is the capital of Australia’.
(f) ‘Queen Elizabeth II is the Duke of Normandy ’.
2. The universes of discourse are suggestions only. Other appropriate letters
may be used for the free variables.
(a) ‘x is a prime number.’ positive integers
(b) ‘y is very cold.’ continents
(c) ‘z is blue.’ doors
(d) It might seem that this is derived from the predicate ‘w is blue’, but it is
difficult to decide upon an appropriate universe of discourse! Perhaps
natural sights is appropriate, though this is not entirely unambigu-
ous.
(e) Possibilities include x ≥ 7, 7 ≥ x or even x ≥ x. real numbers

Solution 42: Predicates with more than one free variable

1. (a) 3 > y.
(b) x > 7.
(c) ‘Canberra is the capital of y’.
(d) ‘x is the capital of the United Kingdom’.
2. (a) 3 > 2.
(b) 5 > 7.
(c) ‘Canberra is the capital of Australia’.
(d) ‘Westminster is the capital of the United Kingdom’.
3. (a) ‘x is higher than y’. For both free variables an appropriate universe
of discourse is mountains.
(b) ‘x flows through y’. An appropriate universe of discourse for x is
rivers and for y is countries.
(c) x + y = 6. An appropriate universe of discourse for both x and y is
integers.
256 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 43: Compound predicates

1. p(x) ∨ q(y) where p(x) is ‘x is late’ and q(y) is ‘y is fast ’. Note that in
English, the adjective ‘fast ’ has other meanings. However, the predicate
q(y) refers to one specific property, namely that of showing a time ahead
of the correct time; thus timepieces would be an appropriate universe of
discourse, while animals would not.
2. p(x) ∧ p(y) where p(x) is ‘x is a capital city ’. In this case the same
predicate is used twice but with different free variables.
3. One possibility is x>y ⇒ x 2 >y 2 . The atomic predicates are x>y and
x 2 >y 2 .
4. One possibility is x1 >x2 ∧ x3 +x4 =x5 . The atomic predicates are x1 >x2
and x3 +x4 =x5 .

Solution 44: Functions

1. (a) Margaret Thatcher’s father was a grocer.

(b) The capital of England is further east than the capital of Scotland.
√
(c) 2 + 3 ≥ 2 × 3
2. There may be more than one way of symbolizing each of these sentences.
The following are possible solutions.

(a) p1 (f (a))
(b) p1 (f (a)) ∧ p2 (a)
(c) p3 (f (a) , a)
(d) ∀x (p4 (f (x) , x))

where
• p1 (x) is the predicate ‘x has four legs’;
• p2 (x) is the predicate ‘x has three legs’;
• p3 (x, y) is the predicate ‘x is older than y’;
• p4 (x, y) is the predicate ‘x was born before y’;
• f (x) is the function ‘the mother of x’;
• a is the constant ‘Fido’.

Solution 45: Predicate forms

1. (a) Q Yes; a schematic letter on its own can represent any proposition.
(b) P(x) No; only predicates with the single free variable x are possible.
(c) P(x, y) Yes.
(d) P(x, y, z\2) Yes; x z = y could be an instance of P(x, y, z) and sub-
stituting 2 for z would then give the required predicate. The predicate
form P(x, y, z\2) has two free variables, x and y.
(e) P[x] Yes.
A Solutions to Exercises 257

(f) Q[y, x] Yes. The order in which free variables are listed does not have
to be the same as the order in which they occur in the predicate.
(g) P[x, y, z] No. The free variable z does not occur in x 2 = y.
(h) P[x, y, z\2] Yes.
(i) P[x, y\2, z] No. The free variable z does not occur in x 2 = y.
2. (a) P(x, y, z) Yes; P does not necessarily refer to an atomic predicate.
(b) P(v\1, w\2, x, y, z) Yes; the free variables are x, y and z, as required.
(c) Q(x, y) ⇒ P(x, z) Yes.
(d) Q(x, z) ⇒ P(x, y) No.
(e) P[x] ⇒ Q[x] Yes.
(f) P[x, y, z] ⇒ Q[x, y, z] No.
(g) P[x, y, z\1] ⇒ Q[x, y\2, z] Yes.
(h) P[x, y, z\1] ⇒ P[x, y\2, z] No.

Solution 46: Universal quantifier

1. (a) ‘Every integer is equal to its square’

(b) ‘All dogs have three legs’
(c) ‘Every capital city has hosted the Olympic games’
2. (a) ‘Every positive integer is equal to its square’
(b) ‘All dogs have three legs’
(c) ‘Every capital city has hosted the Olympic games’
Note the similarities of interpretation in these first two questions.
3. (a) ‘Every integer is positive and equal to its square’
(b) ‘All animals are dogs and have three legs’
(c) ‘Every town and city is a capital city has hosted the Olympic games’
4. (a) ‘Every integer is positive and every integer is equal to its square’
(b) ‘All animals are dogs and all animals have three legs’
(c) ‘Every town and city is a capital city and every town and city has hosted
the Olympic games’
Notice the fact that although interpretations in these two questions are
different, the truth values are the same.
5. (a) ‘Every integer is either positive or equal to its square’
(b) ‘Every animal is either a dog or has three legs’
(c) ‘Every town and city is either a capital city or has hosted the Olympic
games’
6. (a) ‘Either every integer is positive or every integer is equal to its square’
(b) ‘Either all animals are dogs or every animal has three legs’
(c) ‘Either every town and city is a capital city or every town and city has
hosted the Olympic games’

Notice that in these last two questions, not only are the interpretations
different but also the truth values may be different.
258 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 47: Existential quantifier

1. (a) ‘At least one integer is equal to its square’

(b) ‘Some dogs have three legs’
(c) ‘Some capital cities have hosted the Olympic games’

2. (a) ‘At least one integer is positive and equal to its square’ More suc-
cinctly we can write, ‘There exists a positive integer which is equal
to its square’
(b) ‘Some animals are three legged dogs’
(c) ‘Some capital cities have hosted the Olympic games’

3. (a) ‘There exists a positive integer and there exists an integer which is
equal to its square’
(b) ‘Some animals are dogs and some animals have three legs’
(c) ‘Some towns and cities are capital cities and some towns and cities
have hosted the Olympic games’

4. (a) ‘At least one integer is either positive or equal to its square’
(b) ‘Some animals are either dogs or have three legs’
(c) ‘Some towns and cities are either capital cities or have hosted the
Olympic games’

5. (a) ‘Either some integers are positive or some are equal to their squares’
(b) ‘Either some animals are dogs or some animals have three legs’
(c) ‘Either some towns and cities are either capital cities or some town and
cities have hosted the Olympic games’
Notice that the expressions in these last two questions have different inter-
pretations and may even have different truth values, yet the English sen-
tences sound very similar. Frequently in English, a statement like ‘Either
some animals are dogs or some animals have three legs’ is shortened to
‘Some animals are dogs or have three legs’, which is not an equivalent
sentence.

6. The interpretation in these cases is a little problematic. Perhaps the best

approach is to appeal to the truth value properties of p(x) ⇒ q(x): the
conditional is T either when the antecedent p(x) is F or when the con-
sequent q(x) is T .

(a) ‘Some integers are either non-positive or equal to their squares’

(b) ‘Some animals have three legs or are not dogs’
(c) ‘Some towns and cities have hosted the Olympic games or are not cap-
ital cities’
A Solutions to Exercises 259

Solution 48: Deduction rules: ∀E and ∃I

1. (a) ∀x (P(x) ∧ Q(x))  ∃x (P(x) ∨ R(x))

∀x (P(x) ∧ Q(x))
∀E
P(a) ∧ Q(a)
∧E1
P(a)
∃I
∃x (P(x) ∨ R(x))

(b) ¬¬∀x (P(x) ∧ Qx)  ∃x (P(x) ∧ Qx)

¬¬∀x (P(x) ∧ Qx)

¬¬E
∀x (P(x) ∧ Qx)
∀E
P(a) ∧ Qa
∃I
∃x (P(x) ∧ Qx)

(c) ¬Q(a), ∀x (P(x) ⇒ Q(x))  ∃x (¬P(x))

∀x (P(x) ⇒ Q(x))
∀E
P(a) ⇒ Q(a) ¬Q(a)
MT
¬P(a)
∃I
∃x (¬P(x))

2. (a) ∀x (¬P(x))  ∃x (¬P(x))

∀x (¬P(x))
∀E
¬P(a)
∃I
∃x (¬P(x))

(b) ∀x (¬¬P(x))  ∃x (P(x))

∀x (¬¬P(x))
∀E
¬¬P(a)
¬¬E
P(a)
∃I
∃x (P(x))
260 A Solutions to Exercises

(c) ‘Canberra is the capital city of Australia’ ‘Australia has a capital city ’
Take towns and cities as the universe of discourse, and let p(x) be
the predicate ‘x is a capital city of Australia’. Then we can write the
premiss as p(‘Canberra’) and the conclusion as ∃x (px). The proof
follows immediately as an instance of the ∃I rule.
P(‘Canberra’)
∃I
∃x P(x)

Solution 49: Deduction rules: ∀I and ∃E

1. (a) ∀x Q(x)  ∀x ¬P(x) ∨ Q(x)

∀x Q(x)
∀E
Q(a)
∨I2
¬P(a) ∨ Q(a)
∀I
∀x ¬P(x) ∨ Q(x)

(b) ∀x ∀y P(x, y)  ∀y ∀x P(x, y)

∀x ∀y P(x, y)
∀E
∀y P(a, y)
∀E
P(a, b)
∀I
∀x P(x, b)
∀I
∀y ∀x P(x, y)

2. (a) ∀x P(x), ∃x (P(x) ⇒ Q(x))  ∃x Q(x)

∀x P(x)
∀E
P(a) ∗
P(a) ⇒ Q(a)
⇒E
Q(a)
∃I
∃x Q(x) ∃x (P(x) ⇒ Q(x))
∗∃E
∃x Q(x)
A Solutions to Exercises 261

(b) ∃x ∃y P(x, y)  ∃y ∃x P(x, y)

∗
P(a, b)
∃I
∃x P(x, b)
∃I
∃y ∃x P(x, y) †
∃y P(a, y)
∗∃E
∃y ∃x P(x, y) ∃x ∃y P(x, y)
†∃E
∃y ∃x P(x, y)

Solution 50: Reasoning about identity

1.

∀x P(x, f (x))
∀E ∗
P(b, f (b)) b = g(a)
=E  
P(g(a) , f (b)) ∀x ∃y (x = g y )
  ∃I   ∀E
∃y P(g y , f (b)) ∃y (b = g y )
  ∃E
∃y P(g y , f (b))
  ∀I
∀x ∃y P(g y , f (x))

2.
∀x P(x)
∀E ∗
P(a) a = f (b)
=E
P(f (b))
  ∃I   †
∃y P(f y ) ∃y (a = f y )
  ∗∃E  
∃y P(f y ) ∃x ∃y (x = f y )
  †∃E
∃y P(f y )

3. See Figure A.9

Solution 51: First order theory of Sheffer’s stroke

1. (a)
Df  Cm |
t1  t2 = t1 |t2 t1 |t2 = t2 |t1
Df  =E
t2  t1 = t2 |t1 t1  t2 = t2 |t1
=E
t1  t2 = t2  t1
 262

∀x P(f (f (f (x))))
∀E
P(f (f (f (b)))) ∗
b = f (f (b)) ∗
=E
∀x (x = f (f (x))) ∨ x = a P(f (b)) b=a
∀E ∨I1 ∨I2
b = f (f (b)) ∨ b = a P(f (b)) ∨ x = a P(f (b)) ∨ b = a
∗∨E
P(f (b)) ∨ b = a
∀I
∀x (P(f (x)) ∨ x = a)
A

Figure A.9: Solution to Exercise 50, Question 3

Solutions to Exercises
A Solutions to Exercises 263

(b)
Df + Cm |
t1 + t2 = t1 |t2 t1 |t2 = t2 |t1
Df + =E
t2 + t1 = t2 |t1 t1 + t2 = t2 |t1
=E
t1 + t2 = t2 + t1

2. See Figure A.10

Solution 52: Boolean algebras

1. (a) a+a
= a1+a1  B12 
= a  (1 + 1)  B5 
= a1  B10 
= a  B12 

(b) (a + b)  (a + c)
= (a + b)  a + (a + b)  c  B5 
= a  (a + b) + c  (a + b)  B1 
= (a  a + a  b) + (c  a + c  b)  B5 
= (a + a  b) + (c  a + c  b)  B14 
= (a + a  b) + (a  c + b  c)  B1 
= a + (a  b + (a  c + b  c))  B3 
= a + ((a  b + a  c) + b  c)  B3 
= a + (a  (b + c) + b  c)  B5 
= a  1 + (a  (b + c) + b  c)  B12 
= (a  1 + a  (b + c)) + b  c  B3 
= (a  (1 + (b + c))) + b  c  B5 
= a1+bc  B10 
= a+bc  B12 

2. ab

= ab  B16 

= a+b  B18 
= a+b  B16 
 264

Df + DN
t1 + t2 = t1 |t2 t1 = t1
=E DN
t1 + t2 = t1 |t2 t2 = t2
=E DN
t1 + t2 = t1 |t2 t1 |t2 = t1 |t2
=E Df 
t1 + t2 = t1 |t2 t1  t2 = t1 |t2
=E
t1 + t2 = t1  t2
A

Figure A.10: Solution to Exercise 51, Question 2

Solutions to Exercises
A Solutions to Exercises 265

3. Using only axioms B1–B15, the proof is very long and complicated; this is
why it is useful to treat B18 as an additional axiom.

ab
= (a  b)  1  B12 
= (a  b)  ((a + b) + a + b)  B8 
= (a  b)  (a + b) + (a  b)  a + b  B5 
= ((a  b)  a + (a  b)  b) + (a  b)  a + b  B5 
= (a  (a  b) + (a  b)  b) + (a  b)  a + b  B1 
= ((a  a)  b + a  (b  b)) + (a  b)  a + b  B3 
= ((a  a)  b + a  (b  b)) + (a  b)  a + b  B1 
= (0  b + a  0) + (a  b)  a + b  B9 
= (b  0 + a  0) + (a  b)  a + b  B1 
= (0 + 0) + (a  b)  a + b  B11 
= 0 + (a  b)  a + b  B14 
= (a + b)  a + b + (a  b)  a + b  B9 
= a + b  (a + b) + a + b  (a  b)  B1 
= a + b  ((a + b) + a  b)  B5 
= a + b  ((a  1 + b  1) + a  b)  B12 
= a + b  ((a  (b + b) + b  (a + a)) + a  b)  B8 
= a + b  (((a  b + a  b) + (b  a + b  a)) + a  b)  B5 
= a + b  (((a  b + a  b) + (a  b + a  b)) + a  b)  B1 
= a + b  ((a  b + (a  b + (a  b + a  b))) + a  b)  B3 
= a + b  ((a  b + ((a  b + a  b) + a  b)) + a  b)  B2 
= a + b  (((a  b + (a  b + a  b)) + a  b) + a  b)  B3 
= a + b  ((((a  b + a  b) + a  b) + a  b) + a  b)  B3 
= a + b  (((a  b + a  b) + a  b) + a  b)  B15 
= a + b  ((a  b + a  b) + (a  b + a  b))  B3 
= a + b  ((b  a + b  a) + (b  a + b  a))  B1 
= a + b  (b  (a + a) + b  (a + a))  B5 
= a + b  (b  1 + b  1)  B8 
= a + b  (b + b)  B12 
= a+b1  B8 
= a+b  B12 
266 A Solutions to Exercises

Solution 53: Boolean logic

1. (a) 0 (b) 1 (c) 1 (d) 0 (e) 1 (f) 1

2. (a)
a b a + (b  a)
0 0 0
0 1 0
1 0 1
1 1 1
(b)
a b a  (b + a)
0 0 0
0 1 0
1 0 1
1 1 1
(c)
a b a + (b  a)
0 0 1
0 1 1
1 0 0
1 1 0
(d)
a b a  (b + a)
0 0 1
0 1 1
1 0 0
1 1 0
(e)
a b (a  b) + (a  b)
0 0 1
0 1 1
1 0 1
1 1 0
(f)
a b a + (b  a)
0 0 1
0 1 1
1 0 0
1 1 0
A Solutions to Exercises 267

(g)

a b a  (b + a)
0 0 1
0 1 1
1 0 0
1 1 0

(h)

a b c a + (b  c)
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 1 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 1 1
1 1 0 1
1 1 1 1

(i)

a b c a  (b + c)
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 1 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 1 1
1 1 0 1
1 1 1 1

(j)

a b c a + (b  c)
0 0 0 1
0 0 1 1
0 1 0 1
0 1 1 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 1 0
1 1 0 0
1 1 1 0
268 A Solutions to Exercises

(k)
a b c a  (b + c)
0 0 0 1
0 0 1 1
0 1 0 1
0 1 1 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 1 0
1 1 0 0
1 1 1 0

(l)
a b c a + (b  c)
0 0 0 1
0 0 1 1
0 1 0 1
0 1 1 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 1 0
1 1 0 0
1 1 1 0

(m)
a b c a  (b + c)
0 0 0 1
0 0 1 1
0 1 0 1
0 1 1 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 1 0
1 1 0 0
1 1 1 0

(n)
a b c abc+abc+abc
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 1 1
1 0 0 0
1 0 1 1
1 1 0 1
1 1 1 0
A Solutions to Exercises 269

(o)
a b c (a + b + c)  (a + b + c)  (a + b + c)
0 0 0 1
0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 1 1
1 0 0 0
1 0 1 1
1 1 0 1
1 1 1 1

(p)
a b c d ab+cd+abcd+a
0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 1
0 0 1 0 1
0 0 1 1 0
0 1 0 0 1
0 1 0 1 1
0 1 1 0 1
0 1 1 1 0
1 0 0 0 1
1 0 0 1 1
1 0 1 0 1
1 0 1 1 0
1 1 0 0 0
1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 0 0
1 1 1 1 0

(q)
a b c a+bc +ab+c
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 1 1
1 0 0 0
1 0 1 1
1 1 0 1
1 1 1 1
270 A Solutions to Exercises

3. • a & b;
• c, d, f & g;
• k & l;
• j & m.
4. (a) a + (b  a) = a
(b) a  (b + a) = a
(c) a + (b  a) = a
(d) a  (b + a) = a
(e) (a  b) + (a  b) = (a  b)
(f) a + (b  a) = a
(g) a  (b + a) = a
(h) a + (b  c) is already in simplest form
(i) a  (b + c) is already in simplest form
(j) a + (b  c) is already in simplest form
(k) a  (b + c) is already in simplest form
(l) a + (b  c) = a  (b + c)
(m) a  (b + c) = a + (b  c)
(n) a  b  c + a  b  c + a  b  c is already in simplest form
(o) (a + b + c)  (a + b + c)  (a + b + c) = a  b + a  c + b  c + a + b + c
(p) a  b + c  d + a  b  c  d + a = a  b + c  d

(q) a + b  c + a  b + c = a  b + a  c + b  c

Solution 54: Converting boolean logic to propositional logic

1. P ∨ (Q ∨ R)
2. (P ∨ Q) ∨ R)
3. P ∧ (Q ∧ R)
4. (P ∧ Q) ∧ R)
5. (P ∨ Q) ∧ R)
6. (P ∧ R) ∨ (Q ∧ R))
7. P ∨ (Q ∧ R)
8. (P ∨ Q) ∧ (P ∨ R)
9. ¬(P ∨ (Q ∧ R))
10. ¬P ∧ (¬Q ∨ ¬R)
11. ¬(P ∧ (Q ∨ R))
12. ¬P ∨ (¬Q ∧ ¬R)
13. ¬((P ∧ Q) ∨ (R ∧ s))
14. ¬(¬(P ∨ (Q ∧ R)) ∨ (P ∧ ¬(Q ∨ R)))
A Solutions to Exercises 271

Solution 55: Equational theory of propositional forms

1. (a) F
=T T ∧ ¬T  Cpt ∧ 
=T ¬T ∧ T  Cm ∧ 
=T ¬T  Unit ∧ 
(b) ¬F
=T ¬¬T  Qu.1a 
=T T  DN 
(c) (P ∧ Q) ∧ P
=T P ∧ (Q ∧ P)  Ass ∧ 
=T P ∧ (P ∧ Q)  Cm ∧ 
=T (P ∧ P) ∧ Q  Ass ∧ 
=T P∧Q  Idempt ∧ 
(d) P ⇒ (P ∧ Q)
=T ¬P ∨ (P ∧ Q)  Df ⇒ 
=T (¬P ∨ P) ∧ (¬P ∨ Q)  Dist 
=T T ∧ (¬P ∨ Q)  Cpt ∨ 
=T ¬P ∨ Q  Unit ∧ 
=T P⇒Q  Df ⇒ 
(e) P⇒Q
=T ¬P ∨ Q  Df ⇒ 
=T ¬¬¬P ∨ ¬¬Q  DN 
=T ¬(¬¬P ∧ ¬Q)  de Morgan 
=T ¬(P ∧ ¬Q)  DN 
(f) P ⇒ (Q ⇒ R)
=T ¬P ∨ (¬Q ∨ R)  Df ⇒ 
=T (¬P ∨ ¬Q) ∨ R  Ass ∨ 
=T ¬(P ∧ Q) ∨ R  de Morgan 
=T (P ∧ Q) ⇒ R  Df ⇒ 
(g) P  ¬Q
=T (P ∧ ¬Q) ∨ (¬P ∧ ¬¬Q)  Df  
=T (P ∧ ¬Q) ∨ (¬P ∧ Q)  DN 
=T ((P ∧ ¬Q) ∨ ¬P) ∧ ((P ∧ ¬Q) ∨ Q)  Dist 
=T (¬P ∨ (P ∧ ¬Q)) ∧ (Q ∨ (P ∧ ¬Q))  Cm ∨ 
=T ((¬P ∨ P) ∧ (¬P ∨ ¬Q)) ∧ ((Q ∨ P) ∧ (Q ∨ ¬Q))  Dist 
=T ((P ∨ ¬P) ∧ (¬P ∨ ¬Q)) ∧ ((P ∨ Q) ∧ (Q ∨ ¬Q))  Cm ∨ 
=T (T ∧ (¬P ∨ ¬Q)) ∧ ((P ∨ Q) ∧ T )  Cpt ∨ 
=T (¬P ∨ ¬Q) ∧ (P ∨ Q)  Unit ∧ 
=T (P ∨ Q) ∧ (¬P ∨ ¬Q)  Cm ∧ 
272 A Solutions to Exercises

(h) ¬(P  Q)
=T ¬((P ∧ Q) ∨ (¬P ∧ ¬Q))  Df  
=T ¬(P ∧ Q) ∧ ¬(¬P ∧ ¬Q)  de Morgan 
=T (¬P ∨ ¬Q) ∧ (¬¬P ∨ ¬¬Q)  de Morgan 
=T (¬P ∨ ¬Q) ∧ (P ∨ Q)  DN 
=T (P ∨ Q) ∧ (¬P ∨ ¬Q)  Cm ∧ 

(i) ¬(P  Q)
=T (P ∨ Q) ∧ (¬P ∨ ¬Q)  Qu.1h 
=T P  ¬Q  Qu.1g 

2. P ⇒ (Q ⇒ P)
=T ¬P ∨ (¬Q ∨ P)  Df ⇒ 
=T ¬P ∨ (P ∨ ¬Q)  Cm ∨ 
=T (¬P ∨ P) ∨ ¬Q  Ass ∨ 
=T T ∨ ¬Q  Cpt ∨ 
=T T  Zero ∨ 

Solution 56: Properties of quantifiers

1. ∀x (¬P)
=T ¬¬∀x (¬P)  DN 
=T ¬∃x P  Df ∃ 

2. ∃x (P ∨ Q)
=T ¬¬∃x (P ∨ Q)  DN 
=T ¬∀x ¬(P ∨ Q)  Df ∃ 
=T ¬∀x (¬P ∧ ¬Q))  de Morgan 
=T ¬∀x ¬P ∧ ¬∀x ¬Q  Dist 
=T ¬(∀x ¬P ∨ ∀x ¬Q)  de Morgan 
=T ∃x P ∨ ∃x Q  Df ∃ 

3. ∃x ∃y P
=T ¬∀x (¬∃y P)  Df ∃ 
=T ¬∀x (¬¬∀y (¬P))  Df ∃ 
=T ¬∀x (∀y (¬P))  double negation 
=T ¬∀y (∀x (¬P))  Cm ∀ 
=T ¬∀y (¬¬∀x (¬P))  double negation 
=T ¬∀y (¬∃x P)  Df ∃ 
=T ∃y ∃x P  Df ∃ 
A Solutions to Exercises 273

4. ∃x T
=T ¬∀x ¬T  Df ∃ 
=T ¬∀x F  Ex55 Qu1a 
=T ¬F  ∀F 
=T T  Ex55 Qu1b 

5. ∃x F
=T ¬∀¬F  Df ∃ 
=T ¬∀T  Ex55 Qu1b 
=T ¬T  ∀T 
=T F  Ex55 Qu1a 

Solution 57: Disjunctive normal forms

1. (a) (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ ¬Q) =T P
(b) (P ∧ Q) ∨ (P ∧ ¬Q) ∨ (¬P ∧ ¬Q) =T P ∨ ¬Q
(c) (P ∧ Q ∧ R) ∨ (P ∧ Q ∧ ¬R) ∨ (¬P ∧ Q ∧ R) =T Q ∧ (P ∨ R)
(d) (P ∧ Q ∧ R) ∨ (P ∧ Q ∧ ¬R) ∨ (P ∧ ¬Q ∧ R) ∨ (¬P ∧ Q ∧ R)
=T Q ∧ (P ∨ R) ∨ (P ∧ R)
(e) (P ∧ Q ∧ ¬R ∧ S) ∨ (P ∧ ¬Q ∧ R ∧ S)
∨ (P ∧ ¬Q ∧ ¬R ∧ S) ∨ (¬P ∧ Q ∧ R ∧ ¬S)
=T (P ∧ (¬Q ∨ ¬R) ∧ S) ∨ (¬P ∧ Q ∧ R ∧ ¬S)

Solution 58: Converting propositions into clausal form

1. (a) p ⇒ (q ⇒ r ) =T ¬p ∨ (¬q ∨ r ) =T ¬p ∨ ¬q ∨ r giving one clause:

{¬p, ¬q, r }.
(b) p ⇒ (q ∧ r ) =T ¬p ∨ (q ∧ r ) =T (¬p ∨ q) ∧ (¬p ∨ r )
giving two clauses: {¬p, q} and {¬p, r }.
(c) (p ⇒ q) ∨ (¬q ⇒ r ) =T ¬p ∨ q ∨ q ∨ r =T ¬p ∨ q ∨ r . giving one clause:
{¬p, q, r }.
(d) (p ⇒ q) ⇒ r =T ¬(¬p ∨ q) ∨ r =T (p ∧ ¬q) ∨ r =T (p ∨ r ) ∧ (¬q ∨ r )
giving two clauses: {p, r } and {¬q, r }.

2. (a) 1 p
2 ¬p, ¬q, r
3 ¬q, r Res. 1, 2
(b) 1 p, q
2 ¬p, r
3 ¬q, r
4 q, r Res. 1, 2
5 r Res. 3, 4
274 A Solutions to Exercises

(c) 1 ¬p, q, r
2 p
3 ¬r
4 q, r Res. 1, 2
5 q Res. 3, 4

Solution 59: Refutation in clausal logic

1. 1 p
2 ¬p, ¬q, r
3 q
4 ¬r
5 ¬q, r Res. 1, 2
6 r Res. 3, 5
7 {} Res. 4, 6

2. 1 p, q
2 ¬p, q
3 ¬q, r
4 ¬r
5 ¬q Res. 3, 4
6 q Res. 1, 2
7 {} Res. 5, 6

3. 1 ¬p, q, r
2 p
3 ¬r
4 ¬q
5 ¬p, q Res. 1, 3
6 q Res. 2, 5
7 {} Res. 4, 6

Solution 60: Horn clauses

1. All clauses are Horn clauses except (d) and (e).

2. (a) p ⇒ (q ⇒ r ) =T ¬p ∨ (¬q ∨ r ) =T ¬p ∨ ¬q ∨ r , giving {¬p, ¬q, r } which
is a Horn clause.
(b) p ⇒ (q ∧ r ) =T ¬p ∨ (q ∧ r ) =T (¬p ∨ q) ∧ (¬p ∨ r ), giving {¬p, q} and
{¬p, r }, both of which are Horn clauses.
(c) (p ⇒ q) ∨ (¬q ⇒ r ) =T ¬p ∨ q ∨ q ∨ r =T ¬p ∨ q ∨ r , giving {¬p, q, r },
which is not a Horn clause.
(d) (p ⇒ q) ⇒ r =T ¬(¬p ∨ q) ∨ r =T (p ∧ ¬q) ∨ r =T (p ∨ r ) ∧ (¬q ∨ r )
giving {p, r } and {¬q, r }, only the second of which is a Horn clause.
A Solutions to Exercises 275

Solution 61: Logic programming with propositional clauses

1. 1 q :- p
2 r :- s, t, u
3 s :- p, v
4 t :- q
5 w :- r , s
6 p
7 s
8 :-t negation of query
9 :-q Res. 4, 8
10 :-p Res. 1, 9
11 :- Res. 6, 10
Hence we conclude that t follows from the program.
2. 1 p
2 q
3 r :- p
4 s :- q
5 :-r , s negation of query
6 :-p, s Res. 3, 5
7 :-s Res. 1, 6
8 :-q Res. 4, 7
9 :- Res. 2, 8
 Summary of notation B

B.1 Letters
p, q, r , s, p1 , p2 , . . ., q1 , q2 , . . . represent (constant) propositions.

P, Q, R, S, P1 , P2 , . . ., Q1 , Q2 , . . . represent schematic letters in propositional

forms.

T , F are restricted schematic letters: the letter T may only be instantiated to

a true proposition; the letter F may only be instantiated to a false proposition.

A, B, C and other capital letters from near the beginning of the alphabet refer
to propositional forms (possibly unspecified); in print, a blackletter font is
used.

Γ , Γ1 , Γ2 , . . . are used to denote a set of propositional forms. (Γ is the capital

Greek letter ‘gamma’) The union of two sets Γ1 and Γ2 may be represented as
Γ1 , Γ2 when there is no possibility of confusion.

x, x1 , x2 , . . ., y, y1 , y2 , . . ., z, z1 , z2 , . . . and other lower case letters near

the end of the alphabet are used to represent variables in predicate logic.

a, b, c, a1 , a2 , . . ., b1 , b2 , . . . and other lower cases near the beginning of the

alphabet represent arbitrary constants.

f , f1 , f2 , . . ., g, g1 , g2 , h, h1 , h2 , . . . represent functions.

t, t1 , t2 , . . . represent terms.

B.2 Connectives
∧ represents conjunction (‘and’).

∨ represents disjunction (‘or ’).

¬ represents disjunction (‘not ’).

⇒ represents the conditional (‘only if ’).

 represents the biconditional (‘if and only if ’).

277
278 B Summary of notation

B.3 Quantifiers

∀x P represents the universal quantification of the predicate P.

∃x P represents the existential quantification of the predicate P.

B.4 Propositional forms and truth values

=T indicates that two logical expressions have the same truth value.

¬A, A ∨ B, A ∧ B refer to propositional forms in which the main connective is

negation, disjunction and conjunction respectively.

A =T B denotes that two propositional forms A and B are semantically equi-

valent.

Γ A represents the semantic entailment of A from the set Γ .

B.5 Arguments and natural deduction

p1 , p2 , . . . , pn ∴ q represents the argument that q follows from {p1 , p2 , . . . , pn } .

(The symbol ∴ is pronounced ‘therefore’.)

p1 , p2 , . . . , pn  q represents the fact that q can be deduced from {p1 , p2 , . . . , pn }

using natural deduction.

A ≡ B denotes that A and B are syntactically equivalent.

Vertical presentation of inference forms. An inference form Γ  B used as a
rule of deduction can be written in vertical form with the name of the rule
placed at the end of a horizontal line.

Γ
rule-name
B

Vertical presentation of the chain rule. The inference forms Γ1  A and Γ2 , A 

B can be combined vertically:

Γ1
A Γ2
B
 Glossary C

antecedent
See conditional
arbitrary constant
A label which refers to an unspecified item.
argument
If p1 , p2 , . . . , pn , q are propositions, then p1 , p2 , . . . , pn ∴ q is an argument.
The propositions p1 , p2 , . . . , pn are the premisses, and the proposition q is the
conclusion.
argument form
If A1 , A2 , . . . , An , B are propositional forms, then A1 , A2 , . . . , An ∴ B is an
argument form. The propositional forms A1 , A2 , . . . , An are the premiss forms
and B is the conclusion form. Any instance of an argument form is an argu-
ment.
atomic proposition
A proposition which is not a compound proposition; that is, one which
contains no connective.
biconditional
The connective schema P  Q for the biconditional is defined as being
equivalent to the propositional form (P ∧ Q) ∨ (¬P ∧ ¬Q) .
binary predicate
A predicate with two free variables is known as a binary predicate. A
binary predicate represents a relation between two items.
bound variable
See quantifier.
characteristic form of a proposition
For any given proposition, a characteristic form is a maximal form hav-
ing the fewest possible schematic letters. The proposition is an instance of
the characteristic form in which different schematic letters are instantiated to
different atomic propositions.

279
280 C Glossary

characteristic form of an argument

The characteristic form of an argument is such that the argument can
be obtained by instantiating different schematic letters to different atomic
propositions.

clause
A clause is either a literal on its own, or the disjunction of two or more
literals.

compound proposition
A proposition with one or more connectives.

conclusion
See argument.

conditional
The connective schema P ⇒ Q for the conditional is defined by the truth
table:

P Q P⇒Q
T T T
T F F
F T T
F F T

P is known as the antecedent and Q as the consequent.

conjunct
See conjunction.

conjunction
P ∧ Q is the conjunction of P and Q and has the truth table:

P Q P∧Q
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F F

The two operands of conjunction are known as conjuncts.

conjunctive normal form

For any propositional form A, the conjunctive normal form is the propos-
itional form B1 ∧ B2 ∧ . . . ∧ Bn equivalent to A in which each of the conjuncts
B1 , B2 , . . ., Bn is a disjunction of propositional forms.

connective
A symbol (or word) which combined with a proposition gives a more com-
plex proposition.
C Glossary 281

connective priority
In a propositional form, connective priority determines the order in which
different connectives apply:

¬ then ∧ then ∨ then ⇒

Parentheses are used to override this order.

consequent
See conditional.

constant
See arbitrary constant and proper constant.

contradiction
A contradiction is a propositional form for which the truth value is equal
to F for all instances.

corresponding instances
Corresponding instances of two propositional forms A and B are such that
any schematic letter common to A and B is instantiated to the same proposi-
tion.

disjunct
See disjunction.

disjunction
P ∨ Q is the disjunction of P and Q and has the truth table:

P Q P∨Q
T T T
T F T
F T T
F F F

The two operands of conjunction are known as disjuncts.

disjunctive normal form

For any propositional form A, the disjunctive normal form is the propos-
itional form B1 ∨ B2 ∨ . . . ∨ Bn equivalent to A in which each of the disjuncts
B1 , B2 , . . ., Bn is a conjunction of propositional forms.

elimination rule
An elimination rule for a symbol, such as a connective, quantifier or iden-
tity symbol, is a rule of deduction in which the conclusion of the resulting
inference or inference form contains that symbol in all cases.

equivalence of propositions
Two propositions p and q are equivalent if they are corresponding in-
stances of equivalent propositional forms A and B. See semantic equivalence
and syntactic equivalence.
282 C Glossary

existential quantifier
In ∃x P(x), the existential quantifier is ∃. The proposition ∃x P(x) is true
if and only if there is at least one value of x for which P(x) is true.

free variable
See predicate.

function
A function associates a single value called the result with another value
called the argument. We say that the function is applied to the argument to
give the result.

Horn clause
A clause in which there is at most one positive literal is called a Horn
clause.

inconsistency
A set of propositional forms is inconsistent if there is no instance of this
set in which all the propositions are true. A set of propositions is inconsistent
if it is an instance of an inconsistent set of propositional forms.

inference
If p1 , p2 , . . . , pn , q are propositions, then p1 , p2 , . . . , pn  q is an inference.
Inferences are obtained by application of rules of deduction. The propositions
p1 , p2 , . . . , pn are the premisses, and the proposition q is the conclusion.

inference form
If A1 , A2 , . . . , An , B are propositional forms, then A1 , A2 , . . . , An  B is an
inference form. Inference forms are obtained by application of rules of deduc-
tion. The propositional forms A1 , A2 , . . . , An are the premiss forms and B is the
conclusion form. Any instance of an inference form is an inference.

instance
See schema.

instantiation
See schema.

introduction rule
An introduction rule for a symbol, such as a connective, quantifier or iden-
tity symbol, is a rule of deduction in which there is always a premiss containing
that symbol in the resulting inference or inference form.

invalid argument
An argument is invalid if its characteristic form is invalid.

literal
A positive literal is a letter, such as p, which represents an atomic propos-
ition. A negative literal is the negation of a positive literal; for example ¬p. A
literal is either a positive literal or a negative literal.
C Glossary 283

logic program
A logic program is a set of Horn clauses.

maximal form
A maximal form for any proposition is a propositional form which has
the greatest number of connectives and of which the given proposition is an
instance. The given proposition can be obtained from the maximal form by
instantiating each schematic letter to an atomic proposition.

methods of deduction
A method of deduction is a rule by means of which we can write down a
new inference form given one or more other inference forms.

negation
¬P is the negation of P and has the truth table:

P ¬P
T F
F T

parse tree
A diagram to show how a compound proposition or propositional form is
built up from simpler propositions or forms.

predicate
A predicate contains one or more free variables such that replacing each
free variable with a term gives a proposition. For each free variable there is
associated a set of possible values known as the universe of discourse.

predicate form
A schema whose instances are predicates.

premise
An alternative spelling for premiss.

premiss
See argument.

priority
See connective priority.

proper constant
A label which refers to a specific item; the name of an item.

proposition
A statement with which it is meaningful to associate a truth value.

propositional form
A schema whose instances are propositions.
284 C Glossary

quantifier
If p(x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ) is a predicate with free variables x1 , x2 , . . . , xn and Q
is a quantifier, then the quantified expression Qx1 p(x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ) is a predic-
ate with free variables x2 , . . . , xn . In the quantified expression, x1 is a bound
variable. See also existential quantifier and universal quantifier.

resolution
A rule of deduction for clauses: if C1 and C2 are clauses, and if P is a
positive literal, then applying resolution to the clauses C1 ∨ P and C2 ∨ ¬P
yields the resolvent clause C1 ∨ C2 .

resolvent
See resolution.

schema
A schema contains one or more schematic letters such as P, Q and R. A
schematic letter can be replaced by a proposition or a predicate; this act of
replacement is called instantiation. Replacing all schematic letters by propos-
itions (or predicates) creates a proposition (or predicate) which is referred to
as an instance of the schema.

schematic letter
See schema.

semantic entailment
Suppose that for every false instance of the propositional form A there
is at least one false corresponding instance of a propositional form in the
set Γ . Then Γ is said to semantically entail A. Furthermore, whenever all the
corresponding instances of Γ are true, then the corresponding instance of A is
also true

semantic equivalence
Two propositional forms A and B are semantically equivalent if corres-
ponding instances always have the same truth values. If A B and B A then
A and B are semantically equivalent.

syntactic equivalence
Two propositional forms A and B are syntactically equivalent if both A  B
and B  A.

tautology
A tautology is a propositional form for which the truth value is equal to T
for all instances. If A then A is a tautology.

term
A term refers to an item. A term can either be a simple label, such as a
proper constant or arbitrary constant, or a function applied to another term.

theorem
Suppose we have an inference form whose premiss set is empty,  A. Then
the conclusion, A, is said to be a theorem.
C Glossary 285

truth table
A table showing the truth value of a propositional form for each possible
combination of truth values for the schematic letters of the form.

unary predicate
A predicate with one free variable is known as a unary predicate. A unary
predicate represents a property.

uniform replacement
In any context, the uniform replacement of a schematic letter by a propos-
itional form means that every occurrence of that schematic letter is replaced
by the same form enclosed in parentheses.

universal quantifier
In ∀x P(x), the universal quantifier is ∀. The proposition ∀x P(x) is true
if and only if P(x) is true for every value of x.

universe of discourse
See predicate.

valid argument
An argument is valid if it is an instance of a valid argument form.

valid argument form

An argument form Γ ∴ B is valid if, and only if, Γ B.
An argument form that is not valid is said to be invalid.

variable
See free variable and bound variable.
 Summary of deduction rules D

D.1 Inference forms

¬¬I : A  ¬¬A
¬¬E : ¬¬A  A
∧I : A, B  A ∧ B
∧E1 : A∧BA
∧E2 : A∧BB
∨I1 : AA∨B
∨I2 : BA∨B
⇒E : A, A ⇒ B  B
∀E : ∀x A(x)  A(t)
∃I : A(t)  ∃x A(x)

D.2 Methods of deduction

¬I : If Γ , A  B ∧ ¬B then Γ  ¬A.
∨E : If Γ , A  C and Γ , B  C then Γ , A ∨ B  C.
⇒I : If Γ , A  B then Γ  A ⇒ B.
∀I : If Γ  A(t) then Γ  ∀x A(x)
provided no constant in t occurs in A(x) nor in any expression of Γ .
∃E : If Γ , A(a)  B then Γ , ∃x A(x)  B
provided no constant in t occurs in A(x), B(x) nor in any expression of Γ .

D.3 Identity

=I : t=t
=E : t1 = t2 , A(t1 )  A(t2 )

287
288 D Summary of deduction rules

D.4 Derived rules

MT : A ⇒ B, ¬B  ¬A
HS : A ⇒ B, B ⇒ C  A ⇒ C
 Summary of equivalences E

E.1 Propositional forms

Tautology

Prop1 A ∨ ¬A =T T

Contradiction

Prop2 A ∧ ¬A =T F

Unit

Prop3 A ∨ F =T A

Prop4 A ∧ T =T A

Zero

Prop5 A ∨ T =T T

Prop6 A ∧ F =T F

Idempotent

Prop7 A ∨ A =T A

Prop8 A ∧ A =T A

Double negation

Prop9 ¬¬A =T A

Commutative

Prop10 A ∨ B =T B ∨ A

Prop11 A ∧ B =T B ∧ A

Associative

Prop12 A ∨ (B ∨ C) =T (A ∨ B) ∨ C

Prop13 A ∧ (B ∧ C) =T (A ∧ B) ∧ C

289
290 E Summary of equivalences

Distributive

Prop14 A ∨ (B ∧ C) =T (A ∨ B) ∧ (A ∨ C)

Prop15 A ∧ (B ∨ C) =T (A ∧ B) ∨ (A ∧ C)

Absorption

Prop16 A ∨ (A ∧ B) =T A

Prop17 A ∧ (A ∨ B) =T A

de Morgan

Prop18 ¬(A ∨ B) =T ¬A ∧ ¬B

Prop19 ¬(A ∧ B) =T ¬A ∨ ¬B

Definition

Prop25 A ⇒ B =T ¬A ∨ B

Modus ponens

Prop26 A, A ⇒ B B

Valid argument forms

Prop27 A B if and only if A ⇒ B =T T

Tautology

Prop 28 A ⇒ A =T T
......

Prop 29 A ⇒ ¬A =T ¬A
......

Prop 30 A ⇒ T =T T
......

Prop 31 T ⇒ A =T A
......

Prop 32 A ⇒ F =T ¬A
......

Prop 33 F ⇒ A =T T

Negation of the conditional

Prop 34 ¬(A ⇒ B) =T A ∧ ¬B

Contrapositive

Prop 35 ¬B ⇒ ¬A =T A ⇒ B

Exportation

Prop 36 A ⇒ (B ⇒ C) =T (A ∧ B) ⇒ C
E.2 Quantifiers 291

Distribution to the right

Prop 37 A ⇒ (B ∧ C) =T (A ⇒ B) ∧ (A ⇒ C)

Prop 38 A ⇒ (B ∨ C) =T (A ⇒ B) ∨ (A ⇒ C)
......
Prop 39 (A ∨ B) ⇒ C =T (A ⇒ C) ∧ (B ⇒ C)
......

Prop 41 (A ⇒ B) ⇒ A =T A
......
Prop 42 (A ⇒ B) ⇒ B =T T
......

A  B =T (A ⇒ B) ∧ (B ⇒ A)
......
¬(A  B) =T ¬A  B =T A  ¬B

E.2 Quantifiers

Definition of ∃
∃x A =T ¬∀x ¬A
Commutative
∀x ∀y (A) =T ∀y ∀x (A)
∃x ∃y (A) =T ∃y ∃x (A)
Distributive
∀x A ∧ B =T ∀x A ∧ ∀x B
∃x (A ∨ B) =T ∃x A ∨ ∃x B
Constants
∀x T =T T
∀x F =T F
∃x T =T T
∃x F =T F
Double quantification
∀x ∀x A =T ∀x A
∃x ∃x A =T ∃x A
Miscellaneous
∀x A ∨ ∃x A =T ∃x A
∀x A ∧ ∃x A =T ∀x A
∀x A ⇒ ∃x A =T T
 Bibliography F

There is an abundance of books on logic covering many aspects of the subject,

including the philosophical, linguistic and mathematical aspects; in addition
there are books on the application of logic to computer science, software engin-
eering and mathematics itself. Dean (1997) gives an elementary introduction to
sets and logical notation, while Kelly (1997) gives a useful overview of a range
of logical systems: both books are in the Essence of Computing Series. Burke
& Foxley (1996) and Galton (1990) are specifically intended for the computer
scientist, while Garnier & Taylor (1997) is intended for the mathematician: all
three books consider the practical applications of logic and would be suitable
for further reading at a slightly more advanced level than has been covered in
the current text. Burris (1998) is somewhat more advanced and largely suitable
for the more mathematically inclined reader; nevertheless, it also gives some
very interesting insights into the history and development of mathematical lo-
gic. Enderton (2001) gives a good introduction to the theory of symbolic logic,
while the two volumes by Cori & Lascar (2000, 2001) cover the theory of formal
logic in somewhat greater depth; all three books are written from a point of
view that should be useful both for the computer scientist and the mathem-
atician. Mendelson (1997) has been a standard text in mathematical logic for
many years and is an excellent and thorough book for mathematicians; it is
perhaps less useful for computer scientists.
Lemmon (1971) covers natural deduction at a level similar to the current
text but concentrates on a tabular approach to presenting deductions rather
than deduction trees; some readers may find it useful as a supplementary text.
Tennant (1990) also considers natural deduction, but at a somewhat more ad-
vanced level; it would be suitable for both supplementary and further reading.
Barwise & Etchemendy (1990) provide useful insights into the relationship of
symbolic logic to language; like the current book, but unlike other books, the
conditional connective is delayed until after the basic ideas of logic have been
introduced. Hodges (2001) is a very readable introduction to logic but yet man-
ages to cover some fairly advanced and difficult concepts; it approaches the
subject from the point of view of linguistic analysis, and develops the basic
ideas of ‘semantic tableaux’ and models. Of the many books on classical logic,

293
294 F Bibliography

Luce (1973) provides a useful summary; sadly this book is now out of print.
Quine (1986) gives a stimulating discussion of the philosophy of logic.
Note that not all the following books are currently in print, but should be
available in libraries.

• Barwise J & Etchemendy J (1990) The Language of First-Order Logic, Center

for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford
• Burke E & Foxley E (1996), Logic and its Applications, Prentice Hall, London
• Burris S N (1998), Logic for Mathematics and Computer Science, Prentice
Hall, New Jersey
• Cori R & Lascar D transl. Pelletier D H (2000) Mathematical Logic, Vol. 1,
Oxford University Press, Oxford
• Cori R & Lascar D transl. Pelletier D H (2001) Mathematical Logic, Vol. 2,
Oxford University Press, Oxford
• Dean N (1997), The Essence of Discrete Mathematics, Prentice Hall
• Enderton H B (2001), A Mathematical Introduction to Logic, Harcourt/Academic
Press, San Diego
• Galton A (1990), Logic for Information Technology, John Wiley, Chichester
• Garnier R & Taylor J (1997), 100% Mathematical Proof, John Wiley, Chichester
• Hodges W (2001), Logic, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth
• Kelly J (1997), The Essence of Logic, Prentice Hall, London
• Lemmon E J, (1971), Beginning Logic, Chapman & Hall, London
• Luce A A (1973), Teach Yourself Logic, revd. edn., English Universities
Press, London
• Mendelson E (1997), Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 4th edn., Chap-
man & Hall, London
• Quine W V (1986), Philosophy of Logic, revd. edn., Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, Mass.
• Tennant (1990), Natural Logic, revd. edn., Edinburgh University Press,
Edinburgh
 Index

¬ , 15, 21, 48 ⊥ , 178

∧ , 15, 17, 19, 48  , 178
∨ , 15, 22, 48 | , 178
⇒ , 119, 122 :- , 213, 214
 , 139, 140
∀ , 156 addition, 17
∃ , 156 alphabet, 47
AND-gate, 181
F , 18, 48, 49, 59, 156 antecedent, 122
T , 18, 48, 49, 59, 156 application language, 47
=T , 18, 56–60, 115, 130, 158 arbitrary constant, 152, 184
≡ , 115, 195 argument, 73, 150
∴ , 75 characteristic form, 77, 78
, 66, 83, 130, 158 validity, 75, 77, 78, 120, 121,
 , 82, 83, 115 199, 204
argument form, 75, 78
¬I , 108–111 validity, 75, 103, 121, 126, 127,
¬¬E , 87, 92, 95, 96 130, 195, 196, 199, 201
¬¬I , 87, 92, 95, 98 arithmetic operator, 16, 17
∧E1 , 85, 92, 95, 97 atomic predicate, 148
∧E2 , 85, 92, 95, 100 atomic proposition, 4, 24, 148
∧I , 84, 92, 95, 96 axiom, 177, 178, 183
∨E , 108
∨I1 , 86, 92, 95, 97 biconditional connective, 139–142
∨I2 , 86, 92, 95, 102 binary predicate, 146
⇒ E , 134 binding, see priority
⇒ I , 135 boolean algebra, 188, 189
∀E , 164 boolean logic, 11, 190
∀I , 169 branching, see deduction tree
∃E , 170
∃I , 165 causality, 119, 120, 122, 123
=E , 176 chain rule, 92, 93, 98–102
=I , 176 characteristic argument form, 77, 78

295
296 Index

characteristic propositional form, 41 leaf, 96

classical logic, 1, 49 root, 96
clausal logic, 204 deductive reasoning, 82
clause, 203, 204 denotation, 4, 54
empty, 206, 211 derived rule, 94, 137
query, 211 disjunctive syllogism, 90
set notation, 205, 206 hypothetical syllogism, 135
closed term, 151 identity, 94
CNF, see conjunctive normal form modus tollens, 137
commutativity, 58, 60, 94, 181, 182, dilemma, 106
184 discharged premiss, 109, 164, 171
completeness, 103, 113 disjunction, 6–7, 15, 22
compound predicate, 148 disjunctive normal form, 206, 207
compound proposition, 4, 5, 24, 28, disjunctive syllogism, 90
34, 35, 37–39 disjunct, 22
conclusion, 8, 73, 82 DNF, see disjunctive normal form
conditional connective, 122, 123, 125– double negation, 87
129, 131, 133, 194 elimination, 87, 92, 95, 96
conditional proof, 135 introduction, 87, 92, 95, 98
conditionality, 120, 122, 123
conjunct, 17 elimination rule, 85, 87, 108
conjunction, 5, 6, 10, 15, 17–19, 117 ellipsis, 144
grammatical concept, 3 empty clause, 206, 211
conjunction schema, 19, 37 empty set, 64, 68, 158
conjunctive normal form, 206, 208 equality, see identity
connective, 3, 4, 10, 15, 16, 117 equational logic, 130–132, 185, 186,
connotation, 4, 54 189, 191–193, 196–198, 208
consequent, 122 equivalence, 54, 195
consistency, 105 semantic, 54, 57–61, 68, 70, 158
constant, 11, 149–152 syntactic, 115
contradiction, 52, 53, 58, 194 exclusive or, 7
contrapositive, 194 existential quantifier, 156
corresponding instances, 54
counterexample, 200 first order logic, 175, 196
with equality (identity), 175
de Morgan’s laws, 183, 185 first order theory, 177
decidability, 196, 199 formal language, 47, 64
deducibility, 82 formal theorem, 136
deduction, see deductive reasoning, free variable, 145, 146, 151, 154
natural deduction function, 149–151, 178
deduction method, 90, 103, 168 application, 150
deduction rule, see rule of deduc- expression, 151
tion letter, 151
deduction tree, 95–102, 108, 133,
183 Horn clause, 213
branch, 99 hypothesis, 74
Index 297

hypothetical syllogism, 135 NOT-gate, 181

idempotent rule, 58, 187 operand, 17

identity (equality), 175, 184 operator, 16, 17
identity rule of deduction, 94 OR-gate, 182
implication, 120–123 order of priority, see priority
inclusive or, 7, 10
incompleteness, 103 parentheses, 25, 30, 31, 69
inconsistency, 105, 201–203 removal, 33, 34
induction, 73–75, 79 parsing, 25, 26
inference, 82, 83 parse tree, 25–33
inference form, 83 positive literal, 203
theorem, 113 predicate, 143, 144
instance, 19, 38, 40, 41, 83, 154 binary, 146
instantiation, 19, 23 compound, 148
interpretation, 186 in English, 144
introduction rule, 84, 106, 108 tertiary, 147
invalidity, 75, 77 unary, 146
predicate form, 154, 157
label, 144 instance, 154
language of propositional logic, 48 premiss, 8, 73, 82, 90, 91
laws (equivalence), 59, 131 priority,
leaf, see deduction tree arithmetic, 29–31
linkage, 126
logic, 31, 127, 129, 140
literal, 203
binding, 31
logic program, 213
PROLOG (programming language), 213–
logic programming, 201
216
logical expression, 18
proof by cases, 106–108, 111
logical validity, see validity
proof by contradiction, 104, 108–
main connective, 26, 31, 32, 48, 88 111
maximal form, 39, 40 proper constant, 149, 152
metalanguage, 48, 64, 153 proper name, 149
method of deduction, 90, 103, 133, proper noun, see proper name
168 proposition, 4
model, 187 atomic, 4, 24, 148
modus ponens, 126, 132, 134 compound, 4, 5, 24, 28, 34, 35,
modus tollens, 137 37–39
propositional constant, 20
NAND-gate, 178 propositional form, 37–39, 123, 154
natural deduction, 2, 82, 199 characteristic form, 41
predicate logic, 164–170 contradiction, 52, 53, 58, 194
propositional logic, 82, 133 instance, 38
natural language, 1–3 maximal form, 39, 40
reasoning, 8–10 tautology, 50–52, 57, 68, 194
negation, 7, 8, 15, 21 uniform replacement, 69, 70
negative literal, 203 propositional logic, 48
298 Index

propositional schema, see proposi- soundness, 84, 113

tional form statement, 3
propositional variable, 20 subexpressions, 30
subgoal, 105
quantifier, 156 substitution, 168
existential, 156 subtree (parsing), 26
scope, 157 superset, 166
universal, 156 symbols, 1–3, 10–12, 117–119
query clause, 211 syntactic turnstile, 82, 83, 115
syntactic equivalence, 115
rational number, 104
syntax, 47
reasoning by cases, 106–108, 111
reduced truth table, 51 tautology, 50–52, 57, 59, 68, 103,
reductio ad absurdum, 104 114, 177, 194
refutation, 201, 211 temporary premiss, 109
resolution, 204, 206 term, 153, 154, 165, 167, 182
resolvent, 204 closed, 151
restricted schematic letters, 48 tertiary predicate, 147
root, see deduction tree therefore, 75
rule of deduction, 2, 8, 84 theorem, 113, 114, 136, 181
conditional connective, 134, 135 thinning, 103
conjunction, 84, 85 truth table, 18–20, 34, 42–45, 118
disjunction, 86, 108 truth value, 2, 4, 5, 18–20, 34, 35,
double negation, 87 48, 51, 156, 157
existential, 165
identity (equality), 176 unary predicate, 146
negation, 108–111 uniform replacement, 69, 70, 91
universal, 164, 169 unit, 58, 59
universal quantifier, 156
schema, 17, 24 universe of discourse, 144, 149, 150,
schematic letter, 19, 20, 23, 154 157, 158, 166, 200
repeated, 23, 40
scheme, see schema validity, 8, 75, 84
scientific method, 74 argument, 77, 78, 120, 121, 199,
scope (quantifier), 157 204
semantic entailment, 65–67, 83, 130, argument form, 75, 103, 121,
157, 158, 164, 201 126, 127, 130, 195, 196, 199,
laws, 78 201
semantic equivalence, 54, 57–61, 68, variable (mathematics), 12
70, 115, 158 variable (predicate logic), see free vari-
semantic turnstile, 66, 83 able
semantics, 4, 9, 157, 175
set, 12, 13, 63, 64 well formed expression, 47
union, 13, 64, 277 words (formal language), 47
Sheffer’s stroke, 178, 181, 185