0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views

Lecture 4. Evolution-II

The document discusses various adaptations related to camouflage and mimicry in organisms. It provides examples of leaf frogs, peppered moths, leaf-tailed geckos, baron caterpillars, chameleons, dresser crabs, and mimic octopuses that have developed camouflage abilities. It also discusses Batesian mimicry, Mullerian mimicry, and aggressive mimicry using examples like syrphid flies, yellowjacket wasps, and humpback anglerfish. The document then covers evidence for evolution like fossil records, homologous structures, vestigial organs, embryology, and biochemical evidence comparing genes and proteins in related species.

Uploaded by

Saksham Jain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views

Lecture 4. Evolution-II

The document discusses various adaptations related to camouflage and mimicry in organisms. It provides examples of leaf frogs, peppered moths, leaf-tailed geckos, baron caterpillars, chameleons, dresser crabs, and mimic octopuses that have developed camouflage abilities. It also discusses Batesian mimicry, Mullerian mimicry, and aggressive mimicry using examples like syrphid flies, yellowjacket wasps, and humpback anglerfish. The document then covers evidence for evolution like fossil records, homologous structures, vestigial organs, embryology, and biochemical evidence comparing genes and proteins in related species.

Uploaded by

Saksham Jain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

EVOLUTION-II

Some interesting adaptations


Camouflage

Leaf frog Peppered moth

Leaf-tailed Gecko Baron Caterpillar


Camouflage

Chameleon Changing Color

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioblgpA5eTo
Camouflage

Dresser crab camouflage

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYyFTK0C4Nw&t=13s
Camouflage

Mimic octopus – the true champion of camouflage

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmDTtkZlMwM
Mimicry
Syrphid fly Yellow jacket wasp
Mimicry: 3 types

 In Batesian mimicry, the mimic shares signals similar to the


model, but does not have the attribute that makes it undesirable
to predators.

 Müllerian mimicry describes a situation where two or more


species have very similar warning and both share genuine anti-
predation attributes.

 Aggressive mimicry: Humpback anglerfish

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKjFVBVGad0&t=67s
Evidences supporting that species
are related

 Fossil Record

 Homologous Body Structures

 Vestigial Organs

 Embryology

 Biochemical Evidence
Fossil records

Archeopteryx: missing link


between reptiles and birds
Fossil records

Pikaia: Missing link


between non-chrodates
and chordates
Homologous body structures
Embryology
Developmental similarities among organisms.
Vestigial organs
 The appendix

 Wisdom tooth

 Coccyx

 The ear muscles

 Arrector Pili

 The Palmar Grasp Reflex (Not an organ, but behavior)


Biochemical evidences
 Like structural homologies, similarities between biological
molecules can reflect shared evolutionary ancestry.

o The same genetic material (DNA)

o The same, or highly similar, genetic codes

 Homologous genes

o Biologists often compare the sequences of related genes


found in different species

o The basic idea is that the two species have the "same"
gene because they inherited it from a common ancestor.

• humans, cows, chickens, and chimpanzees all


have a gene that encodes the hormone insulin.

• human and chimpanzee insulin genes are much


more similar (about 98% identical) than human
and chicken insulin genes (about 64% identical).
Evolution: Is it only natural selection?
Gene, Allele, Genotype, Phenotype

 An allele is a variant of gene.

IA IB i

IAIA IAIB IAi


IA
A AB A
IBIA IBIB IBi
IB
AB B B
iIA iIB ii
i
A B O
Genotype and phenotype

 Let us take an example, may be eye color.

 Let us assume that the eye color is dictated by two alleles of a


gene.

 Let us further assume that the allele for BROWN eyes (B) is
dominant over that for the BLUE eyes (b).

 Predict the eye color of the individuals with following genotypes:

BB Bb bb
Allele frequency

 Suppose you have a population having only five individuals.

 What is the phenotype frequency and the allele frequency?

BB Bb 𝑝=𝑓 𝐵 =
4
= 0.4
10

bb 𝑞=𝑓 𝑏 =
6
= 0.6
10
Bb bb

𝑝+𝑞 =1
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

 Assumptions:

o Infinite population 𝑝+𝑞 =1

o No selection
𝑝2 + 2𝑝𝑞 + 𝑞 2 = 1
o No mutation

o No gene flow
Homozygous Homozygous
o Random mating dominant recessive
Heterozygous

Essentially, no evolution
Hardy-Weinberg equation

 Suppose, in a population, there are 16% people who have blue


eyes.

 Can you determine the frequency of the alleles in the population?

 Hint: 𝒒𝟐 = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟔

 Solution: 𝑞 2 = 0.16
𝑞 = 0.16 = 𝟎. 𝟒

p = 1 − 𝑞 = 1 − 0.4 = 𝟎. 𝟔

𝑝2 + 2𝑝𝑞 + 𝑞 2 = 1

(0.6)2 = 0.36 (0.4)2 = 0.16


2 × 0.6 × 0.4 = 0.48
 What could be the use of this information?
Evolution

 Natural selection

o An advantageous trait  Edge over other individuals

 Genetic drift

o a mechanism of evolution in which allele frequencies of a


population change over generations due to chance
(sampling error) rather than ‘selection-driven’ change.

o Genetic drift occurs in all populations of non-infinite size, but


its effects are strongest in small populations.

o Random (rather than selection-driven) changes in allele


frequencies in a population over time

o Genetic drift may result in the loss of some alleles (including


beneficial ones) and the fixation, or rise to 100% frequency,
of other alleles.
Genetic drift

https://openstax.org/books/concepts-biology/pages/11-2-mechanisms-of-evolution
Bottleneck effect
 An extreme example of genetic drift that happens when the size of a
population is severely reduced.

 Imagine a disaster that randomly kills a large portion of the


population

o A large portion of the genome suddenly being wiped out

o Suddenly, the genetic structure of the survivors becomes the


genetic structure of the entire population

o The new gene pool could be very different from the pre-disaster
population.

Northern elephant seal


Founder effect

 Another extreme example of drift, one that occurs when a small


group of individuals breaks off from a larger population to
establish a colony.

 The new colony is isolated from the original population, and the
founding individuals may not represent the full genetic diversity of
the original population.

o The alleles in the founding


population may be present at
different frequencies than in
the original population

o Some alleles may be missing


altogether.

 The founder effect is similar in concept to the bottleneck effect,


but it occurs via a different mechanism (colonization rather than
catastrophe).
Gene Flow

 The flow of alleles in and out of a population resulting from the


migration of individuals or gametes

 While some populations are fairly stable, others experience more


flux.

o Many plants, for example, send their seeds far and wide,
by wind or in the guts of animals.

o These seeds may introduce alleles common in the source


population to a new population in which they are rare.
Common misconceptions about evolution

 Individuals evolve

 Evolution explains the origin of life

 Evolution is controversial among scientists

 Organisms evolve on purpose


Lamarck’s Theory of Evolution

 Tendency toward Perfection

 Use and Disuse:

o If a body part were used, it


got stronger

o If body part NOT used, it


deteriorated

 Inheritance of Acquired Traits:

o acquired changes were


passed to offspring
Jean Baptist Lamarck (1800s)
Lamarck’s Theory of Evolution

 Giraffes all had SHORT necks


originally

 Giraffe’s Necks got LONGER


from stretching for food

 “Acquired” trait (long necks) then


passed to offspring

 Giraffe population became long-


necked
Lamarck’s mistakes

 Was Lamarck correct?

o No

 Why?

o Traits are passed down from one generation to the next by


genes, not by an individual’s life experiences or activities.

o Lamarck did not know how traits were inherited (Traits are
passed through genes)

o Genes do not change by activities in life.

o Change through mutation occurs before an organism is born


Antibiotic resistance in bacteria

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plVk4NVIUh8&t=11s

You might also like