Non-Continuous Piperacks System Modular Pipe Rack
Non-Continuous Piperacks System Modular Pipe Rack
Due to the “fast track” nature associated with most of the projects, often the final piping, raceway, and equipment
information is not available at initiation of the piperack design. Therefore, as a Civil/Structural Engineer, you
should coordinate with the Piping group, Electrical, Control Systems, and Mechanical groups to obtain as much
preliminary information as possible. When received, all design information should be documented for future
reference and verification. In the initial design, the Engineer should use judgement when applying or allowing for
loads that are not known, justifying them in the design basis under "Design Philosophy" (a part of your calculation)
Please note that, Unless specifically explained in the project design criteria, no allowance or provisions should be
made for future additions for pipe or raceway space and related loading.
Piping Gravity load (D): In the absence of defined piping loads and locations, an assumed minimum uniform pipe
load of 2.0 kPa should be used for preliminary design of piperacks. This corresponds to an equivalent load of 6 in
(150 mm) lines full of water covered with 2 in (50 mm) thick insulation, and spaced on 12 in (300 mm) centers.
This assumption should be verified based on coordination with the Piping Group, and concentrated loads should
also be applied for any anticipated large pipes. When the actual loads and locations become known, as the
project develops, the structural design should be checked against these assumed initial load parameters and
revised as required. A concentrated load should then be added for pipes that are 12 in (300 mm) and larger in
diameter. The concentrated load P should be:
P =(W - s x p x d), s = Spacing of piperack bent, p = pipe weight considered (kPa), d = pipe diameter W = pipe
concentrated load.
Where consideration of uplift or system stability due to wind or seismic occurrences is required, use 60% of the
design gravity loads as an "all pipes empty" load condition.
Loading due to hydrostatic testing of lines should be considered in the design if applicable. Coordinate the testing
plan(s) with Construction, Startup, and/or the Piping Group as necessary, in order to fully understand how such
loads will be applied to the piperack structure. Under most normal conditions, multiple lines will not be
simultaneously tested. The hydro-test loads do not normally need to be considered concurrently with the other
non-permanent loads, such as live load, wind, earthquake, and thermal. Typical practice is to permit an
overstress of 15% for the hydro-test condition. Because of these considerations, the hydro-test condition will not
normally govern except for very large diameter pipes.
Electrical Tray and Conduits (D): Electrical and control systems drawings and/or the project 3D model should be
reviewed to determine the approximate weight and location of electrical trays, conduits, and instrumentation
commodities. Unless the weight of the loaded raceways can be defined, an assumed minimum uniform load of
1.0 kPa should be used for single tier raceways.
Self weight of Pipe rack (D): The weight of all structural members, including fireproofing, should be considered in
the design of the piperack.
Weight of Equipment on pipe rack (D): Equipment weights, including erection, empty, operating, and test (if the
equipment is to be hydro-tested on the piperack), should be obtained from the vendor drawings.The equipment
weight should include the dead weight of all associated platforms, ladders, and walkways, as applicable.Special
Loads: Special consideration should be given to unusual loads, such aslarge valves, expansion loops, and
unusual piping or electrical configurations.
Live Load (L): Live load (L) on access platforms and walkways and on equipment platforms should be
considered, as applicable.
Snow Load (S): Snow load to be considered on cable tray and on large dia pipes. This load shall be calculated
per project approved design code and project design criteria. Generally, you need to consider 100% snow load on
top tier and 50% on other tier of pipe racks.
Wind Load (W): Transverse wind load on structural members, piping, electrical trays,equipment, platforms, and
ladders should be determined in accordance with project approved design code. Longitudinal wind should
typically be applied to structural framing, cable tray vertical drop (if any), large dia pipes vertical drop (if any) and
equipment only. The effects of longitudinal wind on piping and trays running parallel to the wind direction should
be neglected.
Earthquake Loads (E): Earthquake loads in the vertical, transverse, and longitudinal directions should
bedetermined in accordance with the project design criteria. Vertical, transverse, and longitudinal seismic forces
generated by the pipes, raceways, supported equipment, and the piperack structure should be considered and
should be based on their operating weights. Pipes must be evaluated for seismic loads under both full and empty
conditions and then combined with the corresponding gravity loads.
Friction Loading (Tf): Friction forces caused by hot lines sliding across the pipe support during startup and
shutdown are assumed to be partially resisted through friction by nearby cold lines. Therefore, in order to provide
for a nominal unbalance of friction forces acting on a pipe support, a resultant longitudinal friction force equal to
7.5% of the total pipe weight or 30% of any one or more lines known to act simultaneously in the same direction,
whichever is larger, is assumed for piperack design. Friction between piping and supporting steel should not be
relied upon to resist wind or seismic loads.
Anchor and Guide Loads (Ta): Piperacks should be checked for anchor and guide loads as determined by the
Pipe Stress Group. It may be necessary to use horizontal bracing if large anchor forces are encountered. For
conventional pipe rack systems, it is normally preferred to either have the anchors staggered along the piperack
so that each support has only one or two anchors, or to anchor most pipes on one braced support. For initial
design, when anchor and guide loads are not known, use a longitudinal anchor force of 5.0 kN acting at midspan
of each bent transverse beam (refer project design criteria). Guide loads are usually small and may be ignored
until they are defined by the Pipe Stress Engineer. For non-continuous pipe rack systems, piping may be
transversely guided or anchored at both cantilever frames and anchor bays. Longitudinal anchors may be located
only at anchor bays.
Please note that, all friction forces and anchor forces with less magnitude, (say ~ 5.0 kN), applied to the top flange
of the beam, may be considered as resisted by the total beam section. When anchor loads have large magnitude
and are applied to the top flange of the beam, the effect of torsion must be addressed.If the beam section is
inadequate to take care of this torsional force, alternatives to be considered, such as provide horizontal bracings
at the load locations.
You need to create the load combinations per your project design criteria. However, I have refered here some
load combinations.
For calculation of foundation soil bearing pressures or pile loads, stability checks against overturning, sliding, and
buoyancy, and deflection checks, the following unfactored load combinations (ACI 318) shall be used:
1. D
2. D + L + SL + Tf + Ta
3. D + Tf + Ta
4. D + 1.3W + Ta
5. D + L + 0.5SL + 1.3W +Ta
6. D + L + S +0.65W + Ta
7. 0.9De + 1.3W + Ta
8. D + E/1.4 + Ta
9. D + 0.2S + E/1.4 + Ta
10. 0.9De + E/1.4 + Ta
1. 1.4D
2. 1.4D + 1.7L +1.7S
3. 1.4D + 1.4Tf +1.4Ta
4. 0.75 (1.4D + 1.7L + 1.7S + 1.4Tf + 1.4Ta)
5. 0.75 (1.4D + 1.7L + 1.7S + 1.4Ta) + 1.6W
6. 1.2D + 0.2S + 1.0E + 1.2Ta
7. 0.9De + 1.6W + 1.2Ta
8. 0.9De + 1.0E + 1.2Ta
1. 1.4D
2. 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5S + 1.2Tf + 1.2Ta
3. 1.2D + 1.6S + 0.5L + 1.2Tf + 1.2Ta
4. 1.2D + 1.6S + 0.8W + 1.2Ta
5. 1.2D + 1.6W + 0.5L + 0.5S + 1.2Ta
6. 1.2D + 1.0E + 0.5L + 0.2S + 1.2Ta
7. 0.9De + 1.6W + 1.2Ta
8. 0.9De + 1.0E + 1.2Ta
Where the design of transverse beams has been based on anchor loads as explained in step-2,a final check of
beams (and other affected members) should be made when final definition of these loads is available from the
Pipe Stress Engineer.Based on the Engineer's experience and judgement, an overstress in any element (of up to
10%) can be considered, provided proper justification is given. Where such overstress cannot be properly
justified, modifications should be made to the piperack structure in order to bring the stress levels within the
normal allowables. Modifications could entail the addition of horizontal bracing to the transverse beams to resist
significant loads from the anchor(s), replacing and/or adding members, strengthening members (i.e.,cover plating,
etc.), and/or relocating the anchor and guide load(s).
Allowable deflections of piperack structures shall be as per project design criteria. However, you can consider the
following as limit of deflection:Lateral deflection produced by load combinations that include wind or seismic
forces:Piperacks supporting equipment: h/100, unless a more stringent requirement is given by the manufacturer
of the equipment.Piperacks supporting piping and raceway only: h/200 or as per project design criteria.Lateral
deflection produced by sustained static forces such as pipe and anchor loads: h/200 or as per project design
criteriaVertical deflection of beams due to gravity pipe loads:as per project design criteria h is the total height of
the pipe rack structure.
Frames
Main piperacks are usually designed as moment-resisting frames in the transverse direction. In the longitudinal
direction, there should be at least one continuous level of beam struts on each side. For piperacks with more
than one tier, the beam struts should be located at a level that is usually equal to one-half tier spacing above or
below the bottom tier. Vertical bracing in the longitudinal direction should be provided to carry the longitudinal
forces, transmitted through the beam struts, to the baseplate / foundation level.
Transverse Beam
Transverse beams must be capable of resisting all forces, moments, and shears produced by the load
combinations. Transverse beams are generally a moment-resisting frame, modeled and analyzed as part of the
frame system. The analysis model must reflect the appropriate beam end conditions. In the design of beams,
consideration should be given to
Central Spine:
For steel piperacks with spans of more than 6 m, a center spine consisting of a system of horizontal braces and
struts located at midspan of each level of piping should be considered . This additional light horizontal framing
greatly increases the capacity of the transverse pipe support beams to resist friction and anchor forces, and also
serves to reduce the unbraced length of the beam compression flange in flexure and to reduce the unbraced
length of the beam about the weak-axis in axial compression. This concept reduces the required beam sizes and
provides a mechanism for eliminating or minimizing design, fabrication, or field modifications that could otherwise
be required due to late receipt of unanticipated large pipe anchor forces.
For typical continuous piperack systems, the longitudinal beam struts should be designed as axially loaded
members that are provided for longitudinal loads and stability. Additionally, the longitudinal beam struts that
support piping or raceway should be designed for 50% of the gravity loading assumed for the transverse pipe or
raceway support beams, unless unusual loading is encountered. This 50% gravity loading will account for the
usual piping and raceway take-offs. Normally, the gravity loading carried by the beam struts should not be added
to the design loads for the columns or footings since pipes or raceway contributing to the load on the beam struts
would be relieving an equivalent load on the transverse beams. Concentrated loads for large pipes may be
treated as in step-2.
For any continuous piperack system where the anticipated piping and raceway take-offs are minimal or none, the
50% loading criteria does not apply. In such cases, the beam struts should be designed primarily as axially
loaded members. Do not provide beam struts if they are not needed for piping or raceway support, or for system
stability. Conversely, the 3D model should be checked to verify that beam struts subjected to unusually large
loads (such as at expansion loops) have been given special consideration. All longitudinal beam struts, including
connections, should be designed to resist the axial loads produced by the longitudinal forces.
When designing the longitudinal beam struts for flexural loads, the full length of the beam should be considered
as the unbraced length for the compression flange.
Vertical Bracing
When moment-resisting frame design is not used in the longitudinal direction, vertical bracing should be used to
transmit the longitudinal forces from the beam struts to the foundations. Knee-bracing or K-bracing is most often
used for this purpose. Unless precluded by equipment arrangement or interferences, bracing should be placed
equidistant between two expansion joints. Design calculations and drawings must reflect a break in the beam
strut continuity between adjacent braced sections through the use of slotted connections or by eliminating the
beam struts in the bays designated as free bays. The maximum length of a braced section should be limited to
48m to 50m. If the braced bay is not located equidistant from the free bays, the maximum distance from the
braced bay to a free bay should be limited such that the maximum total longitudinal growth or shrinkage of the
unrestrained segment does not exceed 40 mm.
Column
The columns must be capable of resisting all loads, moments, and shears produced by the load combinations.A
moment-resisting frame analysis should normally be used to determine the axial load, moment, and shear at
points along the columns.The frame analysis model should be based on the following:
For design of steel columns subjected to flexural loads, the distance between the base and the first transverse
beam or the knee brace intersection should be considered as the compression flange unbraced length.
Copyright 2009. All rights reserved. Please do not print or copy of this page or any part of this page without written
permission from Subhro Roy.
Disclaimer: This page is prepared based on experience on Civil Engineering Design. All definitions and most of the
explanations are taken from different text books and international design codes, which are referenced in the contents. Any
similarity of the content or part of with any company document is simply a coincidence. Subhro Roy is not responsible for
that.