Design Engineering: Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, 6th Edition
Design Engineering: Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, 6th Edition
Design Engineering
1
Analysis → Design
2
Design Concepts
3
Abstraction et al.
Abstraction
process – extracting essential details
entity – a model or focused representation
Information hiding
the suppression of inessential information
Encapsulation
process – enclosing items in a container
entity – enclosure that holds the items
4
Data
Abstraction
door
manufacturer
model number
type
swing direction
inserts
lights
type
number
weight
opening mechanism
5
Procedural
Abstraction
open
details of enter
algorithm
6
Architecture
“The overall structure of the software and the ways in which that
structure provides conceptual integrity for a system.” [SHA95a]
Structural properties. This aspect of the architectural design representation
defines the components of a system (e.g., modules, objects, filters) and the
manner in which those components are packaged and interact with one
another. For example, objects are packaged to encapsulate both data and the
processing that manipulates the data and interact via the invocation of
methods
Extra-functional properties. The architectural design description should
address how the design architecture achieves requirements for performance,
capacity, reliability, security, adaptability, and other system characteristics.
Families of related systems. The architectural design should draw upon
repeatable patterns that are commonly encountered in the design of families
of similar systems. In essence, the design should have the ability to reuse
architectural building blocks.
7
Patterns
A pattern for software architecture describes a
particular recurring design problem that arises
in specific design contexts, and presents a
well-proven generic scheme for its solution.
The solution scheme is specified by
describing its constituent components, their
responsibilities and relationships, and the
ways in which they collaborate.
8
Patterns
Design Pattern Template
Pattern name—describes the essence of the pattern in a short but expressive
name
Intent—describes the pattern and what it does
Also-known-as—lists any synonyms for the pattern
Motivation—provides an example of the problem
Applicability—notes specific design situations in which the pattern is applicable
Structure—describes the classes that are required to implement the pattern
Participants—describes the responsibilities of the classes that are required to
implement the pattern
Collaborations—describes how the participants collaborate to carry out their
responsibilities
Consequences—describes the “design forces” that affect the pattern and the
potential trade-offs that must be considered when the pattern is implemented
Related patterns—cross-references related design patterns
9
Design Patterns
The best designers in any field have an uncanny ability to see
patterns that characterize a problem and corresponding patterns
that can be combined to create a solution
A description of a design pattern may also consider a set of design
forces.
Design forces describe non-functional requirements (e.g., ease of
maintainability, portability) associated the software for which the
pattern is to be applied.
The pattern characteristics (classes, responsibilities, and
collaborations) indicate the attributes of the design that may be
adjusted to enable the pattern to accommodate a variety of
problems.
10
Patterns
An architectural pattern expresses a fundamental
structural organization schema for software systems.
It provides a set of predefined subsystems, specifies
their responsibilities, and includes rules and
guidelines for organizing the relationships between
them.
A design pattern provides a scheme for refining the
subsystems or components of a software system, or
the relationships between them. It describes a
commonly-recurring structure of communicating
components that solves a general design problem
within a particular context.
An idiom is a low-level pattern specific to a
programming language. An idiom describes how to
implement particular aspects of components or the
relationships between them using the features of the11
Modular Design
easier to build, easier to change, easier to fix ...
12
Modularity: Trade-offs
What is the "right" number of modules
for a specific software design?
cost of
software
module
integration
cost
13
Information Hiding
module • algorithm
controlled
interface • data structure
• details of external interface
• resource allocation policy
clients "secret"
14
Why Information
Hiding?
reduces the likelihood of “side effects”
limits the global impact of local design
decisions
emphasizes communication through
controlled interfaces
discourages the use of global data
leads to encapsulation—an attribute of
high quality design
results in higher quality software
15
Stepwise Refinement
open
walk to door;
reach for knob;
open door; repeat until door opens
turn knob clockwise;
walk through; if knob doesn't turn, then
close door. take key out;
find correct key;
insert in lock;
endif
pull/push door
move out of way;
end repeat
16
Functional
Independence
COHESION - the degree to which a
module performs one and only one
function.
17
Refactoring
Fowler [FOW99] defines refactoring in the
following manner:
"Refactoring is the process of changing a software
system in such a way that it does not alter the
external behavior of the code [design] yet improves
its internal structure.”
When software is refactored, the existing design is
examined for
redundancy
unused design elements
inefficient or unnecessary algorithms
poorly constructed or inappropriate data structures
or any other design failure that can be corrected to yield
a better design. 18
Design Classes
User interface classes – define abstractions
necessary for HCI.
Business domain classes – refinements of
analysis classes.
Process classes – lower-level business
abstractions that manage business domain
classes.
Persistent classes – data stores (databases)
that persist beyond execution of the
software.
System classes – management and control
functions that enable the system to operate
and communicate within its computing 19
Well-formed Design Class
Complete and sufficient – class should
be a complete and sufficient
encapsulation of reasonable attributes
and methods.
Primitiveness – each method should be
focused on one thing.
High cohesion – class should be focused
on one kind of thing.
Low coupling – collaboration should be
kept to an acceptable minimum. 20
The Design Model
high
a na ly sis m ode l
class diagrams
analysis packages
use-cases - t ext class diagrams
Requirement s:
CRC models use-case diagrams const raint s
analysis packages
collaborat ion diagrams
act ivit y diagrams CRC models int eroperabilit y
dat a f low diagrams sw im lane diagrams collaborat ion diagrams t arget s and
cont rol-f low diagrams collaborat ion diagrams dat a f low diagrams
processing narrat ives st at e diagrams cont rol-f low diagrams
conf igurat ion
sequence diagrams processing narrat ives
st at e diagrams
sequence diagrams
process dimension
21
Design Model Elements
Data elements
Architectural level databases and files
Component level data structures
Architectural elements
An architectural model is derived from:
Application domain
Analysis model
Available styles and patterns
Interface elements
There are three parts to the interface design element:
The user interface (UI)
Interfaces to external systems
Interfaces to components within the application
Component elements
Deployment elements 22
Interface Elements
MobilePhone
WirelessPDA
Cont rolPanel
LCDdisplay
LEDindicat ors
keyPadCharact erist ics Key Pad
speaker
wirelessInt erf ace
readKeySt roke()
decodeKey ()
displaySt at us()
light LEDs()
sendCont rolMsg()
readKeyst roke()
decodeKey()
23
Component Elements
SensorManagement
Sensor
24
Deployment Diagram
25
Design Principles
The design process should not suffer from ‘tunnel vision.’
The design should be traceable to the analysis model.
The design should not reinvent the wheel.
The design should “minimize the intellectual distance” [DAV95]
between the software and the problem as it exists in the real
world.
The design should exhibit uniformity and integration.
The design should be structured to accommodate change.
The design should be structured to degrade gently, even when
aberrant data, events, or operating conditions are encountered.
Design is not coding, coding is not design.
From Davis [DAV95]
The design should be assessed for quality as it is being created,
not after the fact.
The design should be reviewed to minimize conceptual (semantic)
errors. 26
Design and Quality
the design must implement all of the explicit
requirements contained in the analysis model,
and it must accommodate all of the implicit
requirements desired by the customer.
the design must be a readable, understandable
guide for those who generate code and for
those who test and subsequently support the
software.
the design should provide a complete picture of
the software, addressing the data, functional,
and behavioral domains from an
implementation perspective.
27
Quality Guidelines
A design should exhibit an architecture that (1) has been created using recognizable
architectural styles or patterns, (2) is composed of components that exhibit good
design characteristics and (3) can be implemented in an evolutionary fashion
For smaller systems, design can sometimes be developed linearly.
A design should be modular; that is, the software should be logically partitioned into
elements or subsystems
A design should contain distinct representations of data, architecture, interfaces, and
components.
A design should lead to data structures that are appropriate for the classes to be
implemented and are drawn from recognizable data patterns.
A design should lead to components that exhibit independent functional characteristics.
A design should lead to interfaces that reduce the complexity of connections between
components and with the external environment.
A design should be derived using a repeatable method that is driven by information
obtained during software requirements analysis.
A design should be represented using a notation that effectively communicates its
meaning.
28