Process Reflections: Andon Signaling Systems
Process Reflections: Andon Signaling Systems
PROCESS REFLECTIONS
Andon Signaling Systems
Often an Andon may have two signals for problems – one initiated by the operator which is an urgent
request for help while the second is activated by a supervisor who has the authority to stop production.
This type of Andon may have two signals:
The role of a supervisor or mizusumashi (みずすまし) is to execute production safely by managing the
human resources, controlling the flow of production according to the plan to achieve efficiency in the
use of labor, materials, and machines. These types of daily controls are exercised by acting as a second
set of eyes (jishuken (自主研)) and when non-standard work is observed training the operator so they
can make a return to the work standards. Jishuken is a management-directed continual improvement
step where the supervisory function checks the standard work. It is the job of the supervisor to train the
workers and whenever workers do not or cannot follow standard work then the supervisor should take
an immediate corrective action (imadesho (今 で し ょ )) - meaning, “right now” or “now is the time” –
or more precisely, do it right now - re-establish the standard work. Whenever an Andon signal indicates
other than normal production, then it is a signal that something must be done immediately.
Page 1 of 2
24 September 2020 Kivenlahti, Espoo
Recognizing that there can be many different signals that are important to communicate immediately,
there is no “standard” Andon, but each production system designs its own according to the needs that it
has for communicating. Another example of an Andon system is illustrated below:
Kaizen should be made at the time that improvement is required; therefore, kaizen is always imadesho!
Visual management always has three purposes for communication: one is to share company information
to cultivate everyone’s participation and engagement in the strategic and operational direction of the
company; a second is to maintain the condition of work as it should be (e.g., following the plan); and the
third is to control the gemba for safety, production, and productivity.
Reflective Questions:
1. Why is it a bad idea to let workers stop production but a good idea to let them signal that they
need a little “help” to keep things going right? How does this relate to division of responsibility
for the flow of production and the responsibility of workers compared to supervisors?
2. Kaizen changes should be made immediately; however, kaizen activities are planned events to
coordinate work activities of production teams. Kaizen activities are often called a “kaizen blitz”
in American versions of lean. How can you reconcile these two types of “kaizen” which means
to make an improvement for betterment?
Lesson to be Learned:
Communicating worker perception about the quality characteristics of their work (either materials
in the workflow or the act of assembling a product) are “critical-to-quality” activities in production
processes and must be explicitly managed so there is clarity in the meaning of signals and that
there is a clear “yes” or “no” meaning communicated.
Gregory H. Watson
Page 2 of 2