Profile of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments
Profile of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments
1. COMMISSIONER
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
4., EXECUTIVE OFFICER
them.
year o
The Commissioner
The Deputy Commissioner
The Assistant Commissioner
Area Committees.
The Act 1959 "decentralised the administrative
machinery ir». the Hindu Eeligious and Charitable Endowment
Department by creating different levels of management and
empowering the Commissioner to delegate his powers to the
Deputy Commissioner, the Assistant Commissioner and the Area
Committees."
The State Government plays an important role in
•J
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
In the administration of the religious endowments
are :
to make recommendations to the Government in
respect of such matters as may be prescribed.
COMMISSIONER
At the apex of the departmental machinery is the
Commissioner who is appointed by the State Government.
Appointment to the post of the Commissioner is from the
members of the Tamil Nadu State Judicial service or any
other service or by direct recruitment. The Commissioner
must be a Hindu. He is a Government servant. He has
perpetual succession, a common seal and can be used in his
corporate name.
Assistant Commissioner.
1
Subramanian, B., "Administration of Temples",
Thirukkoil, Government of Tamil Nadu Publications. Februarv
1981, pp.64-67, ^
53
1
Louis A. Allen, Fundamentals of Organisation,
EEC Publications, London, 1981, p.301.
54
Revenue
A.ssessment
Establishment and Judicial Enquiry
Accounts and Administration of Endowments.
1
I^alaivanna, ,Aj Temple Income, T&milarasu, Monthly Journal,
Government of Tamil Nadu Publications, Madras, April 1982
p . 32 . '
57
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In the .interest of efficiency of the administra•
tion of religious institutions, whole-time paid responsible
officers are necessary. Their duties lie in due collection
of income, maintenance of accounts and other matters
58
Commissioner.
"Control implies authority - authority to detect
deviations and authority to take necessary
corrective action. It would be impossible for a
manager to exercise control in the absence of
proper authority.
2-
^
62
TRUSTEES
years of age;
if he is an undischarged insolvent;
0
if he is of unsound mind or is suffering from
mental defect;
if he is employed as a paid legal practitioner on
behalf of or against the religious institution;
the trustees.
Tirunelveli
Tiruchirapalli 7.7% 6.1% Maditrai
amanathapuram
North arcot
5 .,% Chengalput
Thanjavur
71
Thanjavur 44 6516.17
Tiruchirapalli 5 587.14
Tirunelveli- 4 605.75
Madurai 1 187.50
Ramanathapuram 2 238.04
North Arcot 1 123.53
South Arcot 5 629.00
Chingleput 4 505.64
Total
66 9392.79
Source: Information given by the Secretary to
Government,
Revenue Department, on 1981.
TEMPLE LANDS IN TAMILNADU
(MORE THAN 200 ACRES)
.% Chengalput
2% Madras
45 % Ramanathapuram
2.3%Madural
2.3%Tiruchlra-
pall i
74.1%
Thanjavur
72
TABLE 2
TEMPLE LANDS IN TAMIL NADU (MORE THAN 200 STANDARD ACRES)
Thanjavur 64 52,080.25
Tiruchirapalli 2 723.92
Madurai 2 1,055.68
Ramanathapuram 4 3,044.14
Madras 1 1,179.61
Chingleput 1 398.00
Tirunelveli 11 8,758.31
South Arcot 1 370.90
Total 86 67,610.82
Source: Information given by the Secretary to Government,
Revenue department, 1981.
73
BOARD OF COMMISSIONER
Head Office
Establishment Mofussal
Establishment
Board of Trustees
Secretary Manager
i
Superintendents
03 T )
0 1 0)
Q) U -P
-P
to m
•H
ro ••HP m o 1 -H
U rH
<D G
fO U 1
S
>-i
< B
O c e •Hc
u
10
e (d :i u
^u Q) o
^ -p u
u o -H
-p
0)
o 03
EH
•H
to
m
-H c
E o o E
o
u
>1u
to
to
o
a o
0: 2
<:
hM J
03
oj U
rH
0
• -H
SI (0
-P
W
f<=-« l E-i
-c
(U E
to w O
M
-p
CO 03
-H 0) •p
w t
0
H -H
w0 a
to
o o
o o •H
e QJ tn
e • U to
0 O O
(0 • •'- I
4
0
<-• < c
>i u o
-p EH
^^
to
-p
•H E
Xi
0
p o
^^ o >H
03 QJ
E a
CO
H o o
a rH -H
T3 E to
CO
03
03
^^ Q) I E
T! to E
-C 0) O
-P a TD U
03 • to 03
C
•H rf! « 03
0H
•H
<:
CO 03 I
to
•m
H 0
E 0
• V^
'O
E in • (0
0
0
u <: *-
(0
r-f
0
c
0, -H
0)
0
• • 13 o
ri: U
•H
^
• u
a c
c
0 (u
CM -rH rH ^
Z -P ,Q CQ
W to m 4-5
0 M -P C
3 - +3 -H 0)
wH
E
m w
•a -H
M g
rt >
^.^__ 2
M
> ^H C
0 -H
X 0
0 T!
Pi u e c
W <D T! in W
o PH « < 0
M
1—1
• —
CO
>1
o
-H
w -p li
> C-1 C tr
M S OJ fi
EH
w g w
0 ^W' r-i
s -H 73 fO
w
EH
,Q to U
zH nJ -H
«
>
W
4^)
CO
TJ
13
P^M W 1-3
'
1—1
J -'
^
P5
o EH
c0
w 5< W
»- M
E-« 0 •z
w
•H
-p
M 0 4-) to
0 W C M
EH CO s
M wEH H
0)
g
4->
to
»
< 0^=^
^•~~ ™ IS M to 73 -H
W M M CO C G
• 0
OH W QJ lO -H
W CO g
PH CO TJ
o| ^ <c <;
"—
CO
<\
t-MI
Uj
EH
^Q-^J
w
0
IZ S
o w C
M Q)
<; H M >0)
CO PS PS
W
P.
>—»
>--
o
m
CO
o|
e rH
2 to
Ui U
0w Q)
s •H C
to Q)
E 01 C5
w <U
i-:i
H
M
PS
w
p.
1
1— .
1—
"
74
not only subscribed a huge sum (Rs. 10 lakhs) from her own
funds to assit the impoverished temples, but also brought
in a legislation to broad base the Hindu Religious and
Charitable Endowment Act.
Official Members
Chief Secretary
Revenue Secretary
Chief Engineer (Buildings) Madras
Director of A^rchalogical Government of Tamil Nadu,Madras
Non-Official Members
Vanamamalai Jeeyar