- DPIT128/UCIT128 Assignment 6 Rubric -

Criteria Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

Report Content (15 Marks)

Omits necessary details Adequately identifies the Contains all necessary details As previous and includes
Title Page and/or includes irrelevant author, subject and title of and uses suitable font styling appropriate contextual
information the report to emphasise the title imagery

1 Mark 0 ~ 0.25 Marks 0.5 Marks 0.75 Marks 1.0 Marks

Contains all report Contains all report

As previous and uses the
Omits report sections, page sections/subsections and sections/subsections and
“Table of Contents” feature
Table of Contents numbers and/or contains corresponding page corresponding page
provided by Microsoft Word
major inconsistencies numbers with only minor numbers without any
to simplify navigation
inconsistencies inconsistencies

1 Mark 0 ~ 0.25 Marks 0.5 Marks 0.75 Marks 1.0 Marks

Content is reasonably sized Content is suitably sized and

As previous and introduces
Content is excessively brief and vaguely mentions the clearly mentions the report
Introduction the major tools/techniques
and/or lacking in detail report focus and/or motivation, focus and
used to meet objectives
objectives objectives

3 Marks 0 ~ 1.25 Marks 1.5 ~ 2.0 Marks 2.25 ~ 2.75 Marks 3.0 Marks

Content is not explored in a

Content has a reasonable Content provides a sensible As previous and is strongly
logical manner and/or
Body progression although subject progression and advances supported by reference
contains significant issues
matter is mildly incoherent the subject matter well materials where possible
(e.g. gaps, repetition)

5 Marks 0 ~ 2.25 Marks 2.5 ~ 3.75 Marks 4.0 ~ 4.75 Marks 5.0 Marks

- CONTINUED OVER PAGE -

- Page 1 of 4 -
 - DPIT128/UCIT128 Assignment 6 Rubric -

Criteria Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

Report Content (15 Marks) - Continued

As previous and discusses

Content is reasonably sized Content is well sized and
Content is excessively brief relationships between key
Conclusion and attempts to reflect on clearly reflects on major
and/or lacking in detail findings/improvements
findings/recommendations findings/recommendations
across both websites

3 Marks 0 ~ 1.25 Marks 1.5 ~ 2.0 Marks 2.25 ~ 2.75 Marks 3.0 Marks

References are incomplete References are largely References are complete As previous and with correct
Referencing and/or not compliant with complete with only minor and adhere to the UOW specifics (e.g. eBook instead
UOW Harvard style style discrepancies Harvard style of book) where applicable

2 Marks 0 ~ 0.75 Marks 1.0 ~ 1.25 Marks 1.5 ~ 1.75 Marks 2.0 Marks

Critical Evaluations (15 Marks)

Evaluation lacks substance Evaluation considers most of Evaluation considers all of As previous and extends to
Site 1 and/or omits many aspects the different aspects listed the different aspects listed include other relevant
listed in the specification within the specification within the specification technical/usability factors

7.5 Marks 0 ~ 3.0 Marks 3.5 ~ 4.5 Marks 5.0 ~ 7.0 Marks 7.5 Marks

Evaluation lacks substance Evaluation considers most of Evaluation considers all of As previous and extends to
Site 2 and/or omits many aspects the different aspects listed the different aspects listed include other relevant
listed in the specification within the specification within the specification technical/usability factors

7.5 Marks 0 ~ 3.0 Marks 3.5 ~ 4.5 Marks 5.0 ~ 7.0 Marks 7.5 Marks

- CONTINUED OVER PAGE -

- Page 2 of 4 -
 - DPIT128/UCIT128 Assignment 6 Rubric -

Criteria Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

Improvement Recommendations (10 Marks)

Improvements are well As previous and the

Improvements are overly Improvements are
considered, described and general feasibility of each
Site 1 simplistic and/or not likely to reasonably well described
supported by the critical recommendation has also
have any significant impact and likely to be beneficial
evaluation been discussed

5 Marks 0 ~ 2.25 Marks 2.5 ~ 3.75 Marks 4.0 ~ 4.75 Marks 5.0 Marks

Improvements are well As previous and the

Improvements are overly Improvements are
considered, described and general feasibility of each
Site 2 simplistic and/or not likely to reasonably well described
supported by the critical recommendation has also
have any significant impact and likely to be beneficial
evaluation been discussed

5 Marks 0 ~ 2.25 Marks 2.5 ~ 3.75 Marks 4.0 ~ 4.75 Marks 5.0 Marks

Report Structure & Presentation (5 Marks)

Contains suitable headings in Contains suitable headings As previous and any

Omits headings and/or
Section & Paragraph logical order and is relatively and subheadings in logical supporting imagery/figures
contains notable issues with
Structure free of issues with paragraph order without any structural are seamlessly integrated
paragraph length/spacing
length and/or spacing or consistency issues into the paragraph structure

2 Marks 0 ~ 0.75 Marks 1.0 ~ 1.25 Marks 1.5 ~ 1.75 Marks 2.0 Marks

Contains fundamental Is reasonably free of Consistently shows well- As previous and uses
Grammar, Spelling &
and/or frequent issues in significant issues regarding formed sentences, correct correct jargon/terminology
Punctuation (GSP) relation to GSP GSP spelling and punctuation when suitable

- CONTINUED OVER PAGE -

- Page 3 of 4 -
 - DPIT128/UCIT128 Assignment 6 Rubric -

Criteria Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

Report Structure & Presentation (5 Marks) - Continued

1.5 Marks 0 ~ 0.5 Marks 0.75 ~ 1.0 Marks 1.25 Marks 1.5 Marks

Styling is relatively Styling is consistent and As previous and includes

Inconsistent styling and/or
Styling & Pagination consistent and page professional with correct suitable headers and footers
page numbers omitted
numbering is correct page numbering where applicable

1.5 Marks 0 ~ 0.5 Marks 0.75 ~ 1.0 Marks 1.25 Marks 1.5 Marks

- THIS IS THE END OF THE RUBRIC -

Version 1.1 by Jason Rodriguez

- Page 4 of 4 -