Girth Flange Load Calculation Using by FEA Techniques
Girth Flange Load Calculation Using by FEA Techniques
Kingston Rivington
ASME Authorized Inspector (A, AR)
ASNT Level 3 RT, PT, MT, UT, VT, ET, LT
ISO 9712 Level 3 PAUT/TOFD, API 510,570,653
[email protected] Ref: Vol-8-1-2020
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. INTRODUCTION:
The Bolted flange connections are used on pressure vessels since they permit easy disassembly of
components (such as heat exchanger channel head) for maintenance purpose. The bolted flange may in
the form of Slip-on flange, Socket weld type, blind flange, a loose-type flange, or an integral-type flange.
An early method to the load & stress analyse of bolted flange connections with gaskets that was
developed by Taylor Forge. It is believed that this method was further developed by the ASME Code
Committee for use in various sections of the ASME Code. The flange design rules are available in ASME
Div.VIII-1 Appendix 2 and Section 4.16 of VIII-2. This paper presents the design analysis of integral bolted
flange for Heat exchanger channel body flange. Since Bolted flange connection have the vital role to hold
the internal pressure and as well various stresses that imposed on the heat exchangers., it should be
designed in such a way that it can with stand the indented purpose during it’s service span. A model of
integral type girth or body flange created in ANSYS workbench & stresses are calculated using by ANSYS
workbench software. The mathematical calculation is also made by set of design rules as per ASME Div 1
Appendix 2. The results obtained by both the methods are compared with allowable stress value for safe
designing. Generally, all load and stress calculations are made for Flange operating condition and gasket
seating condition. Here flange operating condition approach has been chosen for comparison study..
1
Basic Gasket Seating Width b0 =N/2
16 mm
Effective Gasket Seating Width (b=b0 for b0< 6mm b1 10.00 mm
b = 2.5 Sqrt(b0) for b0>6mm) b 10.00
Gasket Factor m 2.50
Gasket / O Ring Design Seating Stress y 69 MPa
Outside Diameter of Gasket Contact Face Go 988.1 mm
Gasket Load Reaction Diameter G 963 mm
Outside Diameter of Flange A 1180 mm
Inside Diameter of Flange B 889.0 mm
Provided Thickness of Flange with Hub tf 142 mm
Required Thickness of Flange t 82 mm
Thickness of Hub at small End g0 17 mm
Thickness Hub at back of Flange g1 26 mm
Hub Length h 60 mm
Hub Factor h0 = Sqrt (Bg0) = SQRT (646 x 7) h0 122.93 mm
Bolt circle diameter C 1098 mm
Radial Distance from bolt circle to point R = 0.5(C - B) - g1
R = 0.5 x (806.4 -
of intersection of hub and back of flange R 78.5 mm
646) - 19
Modulus of Elasticity for the Flange at Design Temp. (i.e. at 100 oC) EfO 200000 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity for the Flange at Atmospheric Temp. (i.e. at 30 oC) EfA 201733 MPa
0.3
Rigidity Factor for Integral Type Flanges KI
2
3.MATHEMATICAL APPROACH :(As per ASME SECTION VIII Division 1 Appendix -2)
NM 24.00 Nos
Actual Number of Bolts Provided
Total Bolt area Ab = AR x N Ab 16770.00 mm2
Since Total Bolt Area (Ab) > Total C/s Area(Am) Selected Bolt Size is OK
Flange Design Bolt Load ( W )
Bolt Load at Operating Condition WO = Wm1
WO 879175.67 N
3
3.4 Flange Factors in Formula Form
4
Factor C30 = - (C/4)3/4 C30 -0.698
Factor C31 = 3A/2 - C17C30 C31 2.782
Factor C32
C32 1.257
= 1/2 - C19C30
Factor C33 = 0.5C26C32 + C28C31C29 - (0.5C30C28 + C32C27C29) C33 -2.375
Factor C34 = 1/12 + C18 - C21 - C18C26 C34 -6.957
Factor C35 = - C18(C/4)3/4 C35 2.633
Factor C36 = (C28C35C29 - C32C34C29)/C33 C36 1.076
Factor C37 = [0.5C26C35 + C34C31C29 - (0.5C30C34 + C35C27C29)]/C33 C37 0.092
Factor E1 = C17C36 + C18 + C19C37 E1 -0.606
Factor E2 = C20C36 + C21 + C22C37 E2 0.002
Factor E3 = C23C36 + C24 + C25C37 E3 -0.003
Factor E4 = 1/4 + C37/12 + C36/4 - E3/5 - 3E2/2 - E1 E4 1.130
-0.356
Factor E5 = E1(1/2 + A/6) + E2(1/4 + 11A/84) + E3(1/70 + A/105) E5
Factor E6
= E5 - C36(7/120 + A/36 + 3A/C) - 1/40 - A/72 - C37(1/60 + A/120 + 1/C) E6 -1.188
5
Factor d = U/V h0 g02 d 883993.762
= (1.33 te + 1) M0 / L t2
Radial Flange Stress SR
B
SR 14.9 MPa
6
3. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (Ansys workbench 19.2)
The finite element details are given below table 1& 2
Fig 4 – 3D Modeler
TABLE 1
Model (A4) > Mesh
Object Name Mesh
State Solved
Display
Use Geometry
Display Style
Setting
Defaults
Physics Preference Mechanical
Element Order Program Controlled
Element Size Default
Sizing
Use Adaptive Sizing Yes
Resolution Default (2)
Mesh Defeaturing Yes
Defeature Size Default
Transition Fast
Span Angle Centre Coarse
Initial Size Seed Assembly
7
Bounding Box Diagonal 1237.6 mm
Average Surface Area 21002 mm²
Minimum Edge Length 13.0 mm
Quality
Check Mesh Quality yes
Standard
Error Limits
Mechanical
Target Quality Default (0.050000)
Smoothing Medium
Mesh Metric None
Inflation
Use Automatic Inflation None
Inflation Option Smooth Transition
Transition Ratio 0.272
Maximum Layers 5
Growth Rate 1.2
Inflation Algorithm Pre
View Advanced Options No
Advanced
Number of CPUs for Parallel Part Meshing Program Controlled
Straight Sided Elements No
Number of Retries Default (4)
Dimensionally
Rigid Body Behaviour
Reduced
Triangle Surface Mesher Program Controlled
Use Asymmetric Mapped Mesh (Beta) No
Topology Checking Yes
Pinch Tolerance Please Define
Generate Pinch on Refresh No
Statistics
Nodes 75938
Elements 41792
TABLE 2
Model (A4) > Mesh > Mesh Controls
Object Name Edge Sizing Face Sizing
State Fully Defined
Scope
Scoping Method Geometry Selection
Geometry 168 Edges 62 Faces
Definition
Suppressed No
Type Element Size
Element Size 5.0 mm 15.0 mm
Advanced
Behaviour Soft
Bias Type No Bias
Defeature Size Default
8
Fig 5-Longitudinal Hub Stress, SH
9
Fig 6- Radial Stress, SR
10
Fig7-Tangential Stress, ST
11
5.0 RESULT ANALYSIS
6.0 CONCLUSION
Comparative study of the stresses in table 3 that obtained from ANSYS work bench software and mathematical
approach illustrates that stress calculated by ANSYS workbench is less than that by mathematical approach
and also less than allowable stresses during the girth flange operation condition. It gives that actual stress
value than the conservative design values in mathematical calculation. It provides the possibility of alter
the design factor and also avoid additional volume, weight and cost of flange materials.
References
ANSYS workbench (version 19.2) [FEA software]
Solid works (2015 version) [3D software]
ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII Div.1
Dennis R. Moss, Pressure Vessel Design Manual Ed 4
ASME Section II Part D Edition 2017.
12