Current PharmacoGenomics Assignment
Current PharmacoGenomics Assignment
P HARMACO G ENOMICS
PharmacoGenomics is the study of how genes affect the way individuals responds to drugs. In this
report, the term PharmacoGenomics refers to products that use any variety of biomarkers for diagnosis, drug
prescription, or patient treatment. These biomarkers can include differences in the DNA, RNA, alleles, and
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among patients. This definition also includes all technologies that
involve Gene Therapy, Gene Expression, Proteomics, and Bio-Informatics.
PharmacoGenomics uses markers in individuals’ genetic code to pinpoint the underlying causes of
disease. The science is enabling researchers to better identify drug targets and mechanisms of action of
investigational new drug candidates. Genomics-related technology facilitates the elimination of unfavorable
products at earlier stages of development than is currently possible. It also could guide companies in
designing clinical trials that would more definitively prove drug efficacy, in turn decreasing the time, costs,
and risks of drug development. In the clinical setting, PharmacoGenomics will help physicians better define
long-term health risks patients face, more precisely diagnose the stage of patients’ disease, and more
accurately predict their responsiveness to specific drugs or the likelihood for adverse event.
prescribe them on a trial-and-error basis. Patients, who benefit, continue taking them while those who do
not, try something else.
Societal Pressures:
Drugs can be shown to be safe and effective in closely controlled clinical trials, as long as the trials are
large enough to account for non-responders. With market, launch come problematic factors not present in
the clinical studies. Patterns and adverse events not obvious in the relatively small pivotal trials are more
apparent once a drug has been prescribed to hundreds of thousands of patients. For example, patients do
not always comply with their treatment regimen. On the other hand, categories of patients not included in
clinical trials, such as children, the elderly, and pregnant women, now have access to the product. Several
recent incidents have given the public reason to doubt the safety and effectiveness of blockbuster drugs.
The most recent blockbuster product pulled off the market for safety issues was Merck’s Vioxx
(rofecoxib), for the treatment of arthritic pain. It was found to increase the risks of stroke and cardiovascular
events in some patients. Vioxx was a $2.5 billion product for Merck. As of January 2005, the company had
lost a significant amount of its market capitalization with the product withdrawal and was facing numerous
product-related lawsuits. Pfizer’s Celebrex, also for the treatment of arthritic pain, has also been pulled from
clinical studies in cancer patients due to increased risks of heart problems in those subjects.
Such incidents have repercussions throughout the industry. Drug companies realize significant monetary
and credibility losses even if they stay in business. The safety of other drugs within the same categories is
scrutinized, and label changes often extend across a class of compounds. The approval process becomes even
more cautionary, and payers, physicians, and patients lose confidence in the products.
Alliances of PharmacoGenomics:
1. Genomics studies the makeup of the individual’s DNA, which is set at conception and
remains the same.
2. Proteomics focuses on the constellation of proteins within the cell, which can be altered by
health, environmental, and physical changes.
3. Pharmacokinetics is the study of the body’s absorption, distribution, metabolism, and
excretion of drugs.
4. Bioinformatics: Working with researchers and sponsors, bioinformatics companies process
massive amounts of data and look for patterns across patient groups or disease progression. Very few
bioinformatics-only companies remain, of which Genetics Squared and Lion Biosciences are examples, as
are divisions of IBM and General Electric.
results with smaller numbers of patients. Smaller numbers mean fewer costs. However, the more important
aspect for trial participants and internal review boards (IRBs) is that stratification, given the correct
biomarker, may reduce or eliminate adverse events. Furthermore, PharmacoGenomics data gathered in any
of the trial stages can be used to improve the compound or alter the trial design going forward. That is,
where in traditional drug development a drug would be considered a failure if data were inconclusive,
PharmacoGenomics enables educated data mining to better define the appropriate patient population, and
move forward as costs and anticipated returns warrant.
Archiving DNA information from ongoing clinical studies—with patients’ consent— could be used to
effectively analyze pharmacokinetic outliers from uncorrelated patient responses, and possibly accelerate
future research. The data also could guide the development of next-generation compounds, which may have
improved efficacy.
In one measure, there are high responders, those who demonstrate high-drug efficacy; poor responders,
those who demonstrate incomplete drug-efficacy; and non-responders, those who demonstrate no drug
response. This latter group may have a heightened risk of ADRs. The way different individuals’ bodies
metabolize drugs also can come into play. As poor metabolizers cannot clear drug from their bodies, they
face higher risks of toxicity and other ADRs.
Another factor contributing to poor drug response can be poor patient compliance. Patients who are
benefiting from a treatment are more likely to stay with it. PharmacoGenomics products, which are
prescribed to the patients who are genetically predisposed to respond, deliver health benefits. Dosages can
be better controlled and side-effects, while not always avoidable, can be better anticipated with
PharmacoGenomics products.
The rising costs of drug development are putting considerable demands on efficiency in the selection of
suitable drug candidates. An effective strategy in improving the selection process in R&D is the proper
selection and application of biomarkers for efficacy and safety during the different stages of the drug
development pipeline. There are two basic approaches to the identification and selection of biomarkers.
The classical method involves hypothesis and is based on a priori knowledge of a process or mechanism.
However, non-biased approaches are becoming increasingly applied.
Genomics-based methods (transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) combined with multivariate
(pattern recognition) statistics form the basis for the discovery of novel biomarkers and biomarker
patterns.
Beyond Genomics applies Systems Biology to discover novel biomarkers and develop biological
pathway knowledge for detecting disease and measuring drug response. Systems biology uses an
integrated approach to study and understand the function of biological systems, and how
perturbations of such systems, for example the administration of a drug, affect their function
Biomarker validity:
It is not the intention of this document to make any statements or claims on the validity of an individual
biomarkers or sets of biomarkers. Validity is a complex characteristic and subject to much discussion. Validity
describes the extent to which a biomarker reflects a designated event in a biological system. Validity requires
not only analytical but also biological and sometimes epidemiological knowledge as well as knowledge of the
(many) interference factors.
For a detail, I have also included a list of Biomarkers and their uses providing current developments in
Drug Improvement Program with some Other References in CD.