SWOT Analysis: Navigation Search Strategic Planning Project Business Albert Humphrey Fortune 500
SWOT Analysis: Navigation Search Strategic Planning Project Business Albert Humphrey Fortune 500
SWOT analysis is a strategic planning method used to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities, and Threats involved in a project or in a business venture. It involves specifying
the objective of the business venture or project and identifying the internal and external factors
that are favorable and unfavorable to achieve that objective. The technique is credited to Albert
Humphrey, who led a convention at Stanford University in the 1960s and 1970s using data from
Fortune 500 companies.
A SWOT analysis must first start with defining a desired end state or objective. A SWOT
analysis may be incorporated into the strategic planning model. Strategic Planning, has been the
subject of much research.[citation needed]
Identification of SWOTs are essential because subsequent steps in the process of planning for
achievement of the selected objective may be derived from the SWOTs.
First, the decision makers have to determine whether the objective is attainable, given the
SWOTs. If the objective is NOT attainable a different objective must be selected and the process
repeated.
The SWOT analysis is often used in academia to highlight and identify strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats.[citation needed] It is particularly helpful in identifying areas for development.
[citation needed]
Contents
[hide]
If the threats or weaknesses cannot be converted a company should try to minimize or avoid
them.[1]
SWOT analysis may limit the strategies considered in the evaluation. J. Scott Armstrong notes
that "people who use SWOT might conclude that they have done an adequate job of planning
and ignore such sensible things as defining the firm's objectives or calculating ROI for alternate
strategies." [2] Findings from Menon et al. (1999) [3] and Hill and Westbrook (1997) [4] have
shown that SWOT may harm performance. As an alternative to SWOT, Armstrong describes a 5-
step approach alternative that leads to better corporate performance.[5]
The internal factors may be viewed as strengths or weaknesses depending upon their impact on
the organization's objectives. What may represent strengths with respect to one objective may be
weaknesses for another objective. The factors may include all of the 4P's; as well as personnel,
finance, manufacturing capabilities, and so on. The external factors may include macroeconomic
matters, technological change, legislation, and socio-cultural changes, as well as changes in the
marketplace or competitive position. The results are often presented in the form of a matrix.
SWOT analysis is just one method of categorization and has its own weaknesses. For example, it
may tend to persuade companies to compile lists rather than think about what is actually
important in achieving objectives. It also presents the resulting lists uncritically and without clear
prioritization so that, for example, weak opportunities may appear to balance strong threats.
It is prudent not to eliminate too quickly any candidate SWOT entry. The importance of
individual SWOTs will be revealed by the value of the strategies it generates. A SWOT item that
produces valuable strategies is important. A SWOT item that generates no strategies is not
important.
The SWOT-landscape systematically deploys the relationships between overall objective and
underlying SWOT-factors and provides an interactive, query-able 3D landscape.
The SWOT-landscape grabs different managerial situations by visualizing and foreseeing the
dynamic performance of comparable objects according to findings by Brendan Kitts, Leif
Edvinsson and Tord Beding (2000).[6]
Changes in relative performance are continually identified. Projects (or other units of
measurements) that could be potential risk or opportunity objects are highlighted.
SWOT-landscape also indicates which underlying strength/weakness factors that have had or
likely will have highest influence in the context of value in use (for ex. capital value
fluctuations).
[edit] Marketing
In many competitor analyses, marketers build detailed profiles of each competitor in the market,
focusing especially on their relative competitive strengths and weaknesses using SWOT analysis.
Marketing managers will examine each competitor's cost structure, sources of profits, resources
and competencies, competitive positioning and product differentiation, degree of vertical
integration, historical responses to industry developments, and other factors.
Marketing management often finds it necessary to invest in research to collect the data required
to perform accurate marketing analysis. Accordingly, management often conducts market
research (alternately marketing research) to obtain this information. Marketers employ a variety
of techniques to conduct market research, but some of the more common include:
Using SWOT to analyse the market position of a small management consultancy with specialism
in HRM.[8]
[edit] References
1. ^ See for instance: Mehta, S. (2000) Marketing Strategy
2. ^ ManyWorlds.com: Don’t do SWOT: A Note on Marketing Planning
3. ^ Menon, A. et al. (1999). "Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Strategy Making".
Journal of Marketing (American Marketing Association) 63 (2): 18–40. doi:10.2307/1251943.
http://jstor.org/stable/1251943.
4. ^ Hill, T. & R. Westbrook (1997). "SWOT Analysis: It’s Time for a Product Recall". Long
Range Planning 30 (1): 46–52. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(96)00095-7.
5. ^ J. Scott Armstrong (1982). "The Value of Formal Planning for Strategic Decisions". Strategic
Management Journal 3: 197–211. doi:10.1002/smj.4250030303.
6. ^ Brendan Kitts, Leif Edvinsson and Tord Beding (2000) Crystallizing knowledge of historical
company performance into interactive, query-able 3D Landscapes
http://de.scientificcommons.org/534302
7. ^ Armstrong. M. A handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (10th edition) 2006,
Kogan Page , London ISBN 0-7494-4631-5
8. ^ a b Armstrong.M Management Processes and Functions, 1996, London CIPD ISBN 0-85292-
438-0
[edit] External links