Module - 6 Consumer Behavior: Npiel Consumer Behavior Vinod Gupta School of Management
Module - 6 Consumer Behavior: Npiel Consumer Behavior Vinod Gupta School of Management
Consumer Behavior
Vinod Gupta School of Management
Module - 6
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR
Sangeeta Sahney
Assistant Professor,
Vinod Gupta School of Management
Indian Institute of Technology
Kharagpur, India
Email. [email protected]
LESSON – 29
ATTITUDE CHANGE,
CONSUMER ATTITUDE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR
Instructional Objectives:
After completion of this lesson, the student shall know about:
6.5.7 Attitude Change: The ELM Model, The Theory of Cognitive
Dissonance, Attribution Theory
6.5.7 Consumer Attitude and Implications for Marketers
c) Attribution Theory:
Another theory that explains how behavior (act of purchase) may precede attitude
formation is the attribution theory. The theory explains how people tend to ascribe
causality to events on the basis of their own behavior or the behavior of others. In other
words, they attribute blame or credit arising out of an act of behavior (unsuccessful or
successful) to others or to their own self.
Attitude formation and change happens because of consumer’s judgment of their own
behavior (self-perception) and their experiences. The issues that need discussion are i)
self-perception theory; and ii) internal and external attributions.
i) Self-perception theory: According to the self-perception theory, a person attributes
causality to events on the basis of his behavior; thus, a consumer would attribute behavior
(an act of purchase) to his/her own beliefs, inferences and judgments. Attitudes would
develop out of the inferences and judgments that consumers draw about their own
behavior (act of purchase).
ii) Internal and external attribution: It is a tendency on the part of human beings to
take credit for a successful or positive outcome (internal attribution), and blame others for
an unsuccessful or negative outcome (external attribution). In other words, they attribute
credit to themselves and blame to others. This could be applied to consumers also. They
take credit for a right decision and act of behavior (to purchase/not to purchase) on to
themselves; this phenomenon of accepting credit personally is called internal attribution.
They also have a tendency to blame others for a wrong decision and act of behavior; this
phenomenon of attributing failure to others is called external attribution.
In assessing the reasons for whether a product meets or does not meet customer
expectations, they could attribute the product's performance (success or failure) to the
product/brand itself or to their own selves or to others or to a mix of these. This has
b) They cannot be observed; they can only be inferred from what people say or what
they do and how they behave.
f) A consumer may exhibit a behavior that may be inconsistent with their attitude.
For example, a consumer may have a neutral feeling or may be indifferent with a
brand, but he would go in for a purchase as he gets a good bargain (a concession
or a discount etc). Attitudes are situation specific.
h) While attitudes are stable and do not change frequently, they can be changed if
something is done to change them. Marketers should understand the dynamics of
attitude formation and change, and make attempts to transform neutral or
unfavorable attitudes into favorable ones.
j) A consumer may have positive feelings towards an attitude object, but he may
have a negative attitude regarding his intention for buying such a product/service
offering. Thus, a positive attitude towards the offering may not necessarily end up
as an act of purchase.
p) Once formed, attitudes are enduring and consistent. However, they can be
changed through learning. Bringing about change requires immense effort on the
part of the marketer, who needs to provide information via media as well as use
reference group appeals and opinion leaders so as to influence modification of
attitudes.
r) Behavior can precede or follow attitude formation and change. While attitudes are
generally formed, before an act of behavior (purchase) or before an action is
taken, they can also be formed after an act of purchase.
1. Assael, H. (1992), Consumer Behavior & Marketing Action, 4th. Ed., PWS Kent,
Boston, MA.
2. Loudon, D.L. and Bitta A.J. Della, Consumer Behavior, Fourth Edition, 2002, Tata
McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.
3. Kotler P., and Keller K.L. , Marketing Management, Thirteenth edition, 2009,
Pearson.
4. Peter, P.J. and Olson, J.C., Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, Seventh
Edition, 2005, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
5. Schiffman, L.G. and Kanuk, L.L., Consumer Behavior, Eight Edition, 2004, Prentice
Hall, India.
6. Vaughn, Richard (l980), "How Advertising Works: A Planning Model," Journal of
Advertising, 20(5), 27-33.
7. Vaughn, Richard (l986), "How Advertising Works: A Planning Model Revisited, "
Journal of Advertising Research, 26(l), 57-66.
8. Wells W.D. and Prensky, D., Consumer Behavior, 1996, John Wiley & sons, Inc.
Ques 1 Write a short note on the ELM model and attitude formation/change.
Ans 1 The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM):
The Elaboration likelihood Model, speaks of attitude formation and change in context of
a consumer’s exposure towards an advertisement, and the level of involvement. As per
the ELM Model, a change in consumer attitudes may be brought about through two
routes to persuasion, viz., the central route and the peripheral route.
In cases of high involvement, attitude change towards a product and/or brand
would occur when the consumer would search for information related to the offering. The
consumer would also have a high need of cognition, and would put in effort to gather and
comprehend information about the object in question. This would result in learning and
also lead to attitude change that would occur via the central route to persuasion. Thus, in
cases of higher involvement, the consumer lays focus on “central” product related
information; comprehension is deeper; extent of elaboration is higher and all this impacts
attitude towards the brand. On the other hand in cases of low involvement, attitude
change towards a product and/or brand would occur via the peripheral route to
persuasion. There would be a lower involvement with the product and/or brand message,
with a focus on the “peripheral” or the non-product related information (beautiful ads,
attractive models, discounts, free samples, etc); comprehension is shallow; extent of
elaboration is low all this impacts attitude towards the advertisement rather than the
brand.
To conclude, when actual and potential consumers put in effort to gather,
comprehend and evaluate information about the product and/or brand, they exhibit higher
levels of motivation and ability. In such cases, learning and attitude change would occur
via the central route
Section A True/false:
1. The Attribution Theory explains as to why acts of behavior (purchase) might
precede attitude formation.
2. Attitude formation as a process is impacted by needs and motivation, perception
as well as learning.
3. A consumer may have positive feelings towards an attitude object, but he may
have a negative attitude regarding his intention for buying such a product/service
offering.
4. Behavior can precede or follow attitude formation and change.
KEY
Section A True/false:
1. True 2. True 3. True 4. True
________________________________________________________________________