Process Costing vs. Job Costing
Process Costing vs. Job Costing
Process costing is a term used in cost accounting to describe one method for collecting and
assigning manufacturing costs to the units produced. A processing cost system is used when nearly
identical units are mass produced. (Job costing or job order costing is a system used to collect and
assign manufacturing costs to units that vary from one another.)
Example of Process Costing
Let's assume that a company manufactures large quantities of an identical product. The product
requires several processing operations, each of which occurs in a separate department. In the first
department, the following processing costs were incurred during the month of June:
Size of job: process costing is more suited to large-scale production runs than job
costing, which is more suited to tracking small production runs with fewer units.
Type of product: whereas process costing is used for standardised, mass-produced
products, job costing is usually used for custom or unique products.
Billing customers: using job costing, it is possible to bill customers specific costs
for commissioned produced. This is less straightforward using process costing, as costs
are aggregated.
Record keeping: Process costing combined costs and therefore requires less
recording keeping than job costing, which traces labour, materials, and overhead to
specific jobs, batches, or units.
Process costing is used when there is mass production of similar products, where the costs
associated with individual units of output cannot be differentiated from each other. In other
words, the cost of each product produced is assumed to be the same as the cost of every other
product. Under this concept, costs are accumulated over a fixed period of time, summarized,
and then allocated to all of the units produced during that period of time on a consistent basis.
When products are instead being manufactured on an individual basis, job costing is used to
accumulate costs and assign the costs to products. When a production process contains some
mass manufacturing and some customized elements, then a hybrid costing system is used.
Examples of the industries where this type of production occurs include oil refining, food
production, and chemical processing. For example, how would you determine the precise cost
required to create one gallon of aviation fuel, when thousands of gallons of the same fuel are
gushing out of a refinery every hour? The cost accounting methodology used for this scenario is
process costing.
Process costing is the only reasonable approach to determining product costs in many
industries. It uses most of the same journal entries found in a job costing environment, so there
is no need to restructure the chart of accounts to any significant degree. This makes it easy to
switch over to a job costing system from a process costing one if the need arises, or to adopt a
hybrid approach that uses portions of both systems.
1. Weighted average costs. This version assumes that all costs, whether from a preceding
period or the current one, are lumped together and assigned to produced units. It is the simplest
version to calculate.
2. Standard costs. This version is based on standard costs. Its calculation is similar to
weighted average costing, but standard costs are assigned to production units, rather than actual
costs; after total costs are accumulated based on standard costs, these totals are compared to
actual accumulated costs, and the difference is charged to a variance account.
3. First-in first-out costing (FIFO). FIFO is a more complex calculation that creates layers
of costs, one for any units of production that were started in the previous production period but
not completed, and another layer for any production that is started in the current period.
There is no last in, first out (LIFO) costing method used in process costing, since the underlying
assumption of process costing is that the first unit produced is, in fact, the first unit used, which
is the FIFO concept.
Why have three different cost calculation methods for process costing, and why use one version
instead of another? The different calculations are required for different cost accounting needs.
The weighted average method is used in situations where there is no standard costing system, or
where the fluctuations in costs from period to period are so slight that the management team has
no need for the slight improvement in costing accuracy that can be obtained with the FIFO
costing method. Alternatively, process costing that is based on standard costs is required for
costing systems that use standard costs. It is also useful in situations where companies
manufacture such a broad mix of products that they have difficulty accurately assigning actual
costs to each type of product; under the other process costing methodologies, which both use
actual costs, there is a strong chance that costs for different products will become mixed
together. Finally, FIFO costing is used when there are ongoing and significant changes in
product costs from period to period – to such an extent that the management team needs to
know the new costing levels so that it can re-price products appropriately, determine if there are
internal costing problems requiring resolution, or perhaps to change manager performance-
based compensation . In general, the simplest costing approach is the weighted average method,
with FIFO costing being the most difficult.
The typical manner in which costs flow in process costing is that direct
material costs are added at the beginning of the process, while all other costs
(both direct labor and overhead) are gradually added over the course of the
production process. For example, in a food processing operation, the direct
material (such as a cow) is added at the beginning of the operation, and then
various rendering operations gradually convert the direct material into
finished products (such as steaks).
In process costing it is the process that is costed (unlike job costing where each job is
costed separately). The method used is to take the total cost of the process and
average it over the units of production.
Normal loss
This is the term used to describe normal expected wastage under usual operating
conditions. This may be due to reasons such as evaporation, testing or rejects.
Abnormal loss
This is when a loss occurs over and above the normal expected loss. This may be due
to reasons such as faulty machinery or errors by labourers.
Abnormal gain
This occurs when the actual loss is lower than the normal loss. This could, for example,
be due to greater efficiency from newly-purchased machinery.
Scrap value
Sometimes the outcome of a loss can be sold for a small value. For example, in the
production of screws there may be a loss such as metal wastage. This may be sold to a
scrap merchant for a fee.
Equivalent units
This refers to a conversion of part-completed units into an equivalent number of wholly-
completed units. For example, if 1,000 cars are 40% complete then the equivalent
number of completed cars would be 1,000 x 40% = 400 cars. Note: If 1,000 cars are
60% complete on the painting, but 40% complete on the testing, then equivalent units
will need to be established for each type of cost. (See numerical example later.)
Note: Although this proforma includes both losses and WIP, the Paper F2/FMA syllabus
specifically excludes situations where both occur in the same process. Therefore, don’t
expect to have to complete all of the steps in the questions.
Normal loss example Mr Bean’s chocolate Wiggly bars pass through two processes.
The data for the month just ended are:
Mr Bean allows the staff to eat 5% of the chocolate as they work on Process 1. There
was no work in progress at the month end. Prepare the two process accounts and
calculate the cost per kg.
Workings
1. The staff normally eat 5% of the chocolate, so the normal loss is 4,000 x 5% =
200kg
There is no work in progress or scrap value or abnormal losses or gains, so we can now
balance the account to obtain the amounts transferred to Process 2.
There is a heat wave and staff have eaten less chocolate. At the end of Process 1,
3,810 units are transferred to Process 2.
Workings
Here we need to calculate the scrap value. The value of units transferred to Process 2
is a balancing figure.
1. Number of kg of normal loss scrap amount per kg = 200 x 0.4 = $80 [Dr Scrap A /
C $80, Cr Process A / C $80]
Be careful here! The scrap value also affects the abnormal gain or loss accounts. Since
the staff didn’t eat the number of bars that they were entitled to, the scrap value (the 40c
per bar) is lower than 200 40c. In fact, it is 10 x 40c = $4 lower (the abnormal gain). This
needs to be reflected in the scrap account and the abnormal gain account.
Work in progress example
Assuming at the month end there are now part-completed bars (work- in-progress).
Assuming also that he stopped charging staff for the bars that they had eaten. The data
for Process 2 was as follows:
For questions that include WIP, we need to calculate equivalent units. First, we need to
choose the method of valuing WIP. In an exam, use the first in first out (FIFO) method if
the percentage completion of each element of opening WIP is given. Use the weighted
average (WA) method if the value of each element of opening WIP is given. [Note that
the two methods give different valuations for the closing WIP.]