Operating Deflection Shapes From Time Versus Frequency Domain Measurements
Operating Deflection Shapes From Time Versus Frequency Domain Measurements
Page 1 of 8
11th IMAC Conference, Kissimmee, FL February, 1993
There are two ways to meet this criterion; digitize the time of a vibration problem by assuming that the structure is be-
domain signals at a very high sampling rate (twice the high- having in a linear (or near linear) manner. Then, both time
est expected frequency in the signals), or band limit the time and frequency domain techniques can be used.
domain signals with filters. Since the time signals must be
The equation of motion for a vibrating structure is common-
frequency limited before they are digitized, they must be
ly derived by applying Newton's second law to all of the
filtered as analog signals using analog filters. In a multi-
DOFs of interest on the structure. In an experimental situa-
channel system, all of the anti-aliasing filters must filter all
tion, this results in a countable set of equations, one for each
channels in the same way, and this usually adds to the cost
measured DOF:
of the system.
[M] {x''(t)} + [C] {x'(t)} + [K] {x(t)} = {f(t)} (1)
Having acquired either a set of sampled time domain re-
sponses, or computed (via the FFT) a set of frequency do- Notice that the excitation forces and responses are functions
main responses, an operating deflection shape is defined as: of time (t), and that the coefficient matrices [M], [C], and
[K] are constants. This is a dynamic model for describing
Operating Deflection Shape: The values of a set of simul-
the vibration of a linear, time invariant structure.
taneously sampled time domain responses at a specific time,
or the values of a set of frequency domain responses at a
specific frequency. The Fourier Transform
The Fourier transform is defined for continuous signals.
The analogous discrete Fourier transform (DFT) is defined
Operating Deflection Shapes versus Mode Shapes
for discrete (sampled) signals. The FFT algorithm performs
The vibration response of a structure depends on both the
the DFT on a finite number of samples of time domain data.
amount and the location of its excitation. Therefore its op-
More specifically, the FFT transforms (N) samples of real
erating deflection shapes always depend on its excitation
valued time domain data into (N/2) samples of complex
source(s). On the other hand, the mode shapes of a struc-
valued frequency domain data. Likewise, the Inverse FFT
ture do not depend on either the amount or location of its
converts (N/2) samples of complex valued frequency do-
excitation. That is, they are natural properties of the struc-
main into (N) samples of real time domain data. (For prac-
ture, and will not change unless its physical properties
tical reasons, the number of samples (N) is usually restrict-
(mass, stiffness, and damping), or its boundary conditions
ed to an integer power of 2.)
are changed.
When initial conditions are ignored, the equivalent frequen-
Mode shapes, by themselves, do not have fixed values (they
cy domain form of the dynamic model for a structure can be
have no units), and therefore cannot tell you how much a
represented in terms of discrete Fourier transforms:
structure is actually moving. They can only show the rela-
tive motions between two DOFs of a structure. Using mod- {X(jω)} = [H(jω)] {F(jω)} (2)
al parameters, the answer to the question, "How much ...?"
can only be answered once the amount and location of all of This equation is valid for all discrete frequency values for
the excitation forces is specified. Then, modal parameters which the discrete Fourier transforms are computed. Taking
can be used to synthesize an operating deflection shape. -1
the inverse FFT (FFT ) of the above equation yields the
forced response equation for the structure. (For a fixed
But, what if the amount and location of all of the excitations
value of time (t), the forced response vector {x (t)} is the
cannot be identified, or are too complex to identify? Then, f
direct measurement of the operating deflection shape is the operating deflection shape.)
only way to answer the question, "How much ...?"
-1
{x (t)} = FFT {[H(jω)] {F(jω)}} (3)
Since many vibration problems involve the excitation of f
modes (or resonances), operating deflection shapes and
mode shapes must be closely related to one another, and
indeed they are. In the following section, this relationship
is examined in more detail.
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Since an operating deflection shape is defined simply as the
response of a structure at a specific time or frequency, no
assumption is made regarding the linearity of the structure's
response. However, many vibration problems in structures
involve the excitation of modes, which are only defined for
linear systems. Furthermore, since the FFT is a linear trans-
formation, it is much more profitable to begin the analysis
Page 2 of 8
11th IMAC Conference, Kissimmee, FL February, 1993
[Hm(jω)]
where:
tr
[Hk(jω)] = Ak{uk}{uk} /(jω - pk) (4)
tr
+ A*k{u*k}{u*k} /(jω - p*k)
Figure 1. An FRF Measurement. Notice that each term of the FRF matrix is represented in
terms of a pole location and a mode shape. Notice also that
Several conclusions can be drawn from the forced response all the numerators are simply constants, and that only the
equation: denominators are functions of frequency. The numerators
• The Fourier transform of the forced response is made are also called residues. Each term of the FRF matrix can
up of a summation of the transforms of all of the exci- also be represented in terms of poles and residues:
tation forces times the columns of the FRF correspond- [Hk(jω)] = [Rk] / (jω - pk) + [R*k] / (jω - p*k) (5)
ing to the excitation DOFs.
where:
• The unit Impulse Response of the structure is obtained
by setting one of the elements of the transformed exci- [Rk] = the (n by n) residue matrix for the kth mode
tation vector {F(jω)} equal to one (1), since the Fourier
transform of a unit impulse is one for all frequencies. tr
= Ak{uk}{uk}
From the forced response equation, an n-vector of im-
pulse responses is obtained by inverse Fourier trans- Again, it's worth noting that the numerators (residues) of an
forming one of the columns of the FRF matrix, the col- FRF are merely constants, fixed in value. The mode shapes
umn corresponding to the DOF where the impulse is are eigenvectors; that is, they can change in value, but not
applied. This column is also called the reference col- in shape. The denominators are functions of frequency, and
umn. cause the peaks in an FRF. The locations of the peaks are
dictated by the pole locations (pk). Each peak in the FRF is
• The impulse response of the structure depends on
where the impulsive force is applied, which certainly evidence of at least one pole, or mode, or resonant condi-
serves our intuition. tion. A typical FRF measurement (one element of the FRF
matrix) is shown in Figure 1.
• The Sinusoidal Response of the structure to a single
sinusoidal excitation is obtained by inverse Fourier Forced Response in Terms of Modes
transforming the values of the reference (excitation) Several more conclusions can be drawn by substituting the
column of the FRF matrix, at the sinusoidal frequency. modal parametric form of the FRF matrix into the forced
This is so because the Fourier transform of a sine wave response equation:
signal is non-zero at the sine frequency, and zero for all
other frequencies. The forced response equation also • Every element of the FRF matrix (between any pair of
shows that for sine excitation, the operating deflection DOFs) is a summation of contributions from all of the
shape is merely the values of the FRFs from the refer- modes of the structure. Therefore, the forced response
ence column, at the excitation frequency. potentially contains contributions from all of the
modes.
• The forced response, (and hence the operating deflec-
tion shape), is completely arbitrary, depending on the • The operating deflection shape depends not only on the
combination of excitation forces acting on the structure. excitation forces, but also on the locations of the poles
(resonant peak frequencies) and the structure's mode
Modal Parameters shapes.
If it is further assumed that reciprocity is valid for the test
structure, (the [M], [C], and [K] matrices are symmetric), • If an excitation force puts energy into a structure near a
then the FRF matrix can be represented completely in terms resonant peak frequency, the operating deflection shape
of the modal parameters of the structure. Using superposi- could be very large, depending on the value of the
Page 3 of 8
11th IMAC Conference, Kissimmee, FL February, 1993
Inverse
FFT
Page 4 of 8
11th IMAC Conference, Kissimmee, FL February, 1993
Page 5 of 8
11th IMAC Conference, Kissimmee, FL February, 1993
reference
DOF
Page 6 of 8
11th IMAC Conference, Kissimmee, FL February 1993
FRF
The FRF is a 2-channel measurement, involving a response
and an excitation signal. It can be estimated in several
ways, depending on whether the excitation or the response
has more measurement noise associated with it. The most
common calculation involves dividing the Cross Power
Spectrum between the response and excitation signals by
the Auto Power Spectrum of the excitation, at each frequen-
cy. Averaging of several Cross and Auto Power Spectra
together is also commonly done, to reduce noise. Phase is
preserved in the FRF, but a set of FRFs need not be ob-
tained by simultaneously sampling all of the time domain Figure 5. Operating Deflection Shape from FRFs at 780 Hz.
responses. Each (response, excitation) pair must be simul-
taneously sampled, however.
Since a set of FRFs contains both magnitude and phase at
each frequency, the operating deflection shapes derived
from a set of FRFs will also contain both magnitude and
phase information. The units of the operating deflection
shapes are acceleration, velocity, or displacement per unit
of excitation force at the reference DOF.
Page 7 of 8
11th IMAC Conference, Kissimmee, FL February 1993
REFERENCES
[1] Potter, R. and Richardson, M.H. "Identification of the
Modal Properties of an Elastic Structure from Measured
Transfer Function Data" 20th International Instrumentation
Symposium, Albuquerque, New Mexico, May 21-23, 1974.
[2] Døssing, Ole "Structural Stroboscopy-Measurement of
Operational Deflection Shapes" Sound and Vibration Maga-
zine, August 1988.
CONCLUSIONS
Operating deflection shapes were defined for both time and
frequency domain functions. Operating deflection shapes
and mode shapes were compared, and it was shown that
they are quite different, yet related to one another.
• Operating deflection shapes depend on both the amount
and the location of excitation forces on a structure,
whether the forces are known or not. Modes shapes do
not depend on excitation forces, but are natural proper-
ties of a structure.
• Operating deflection shapes show how much a structure
is really moving. Mode shapes have no unique value,
so they cannot be used directly to determine how much
a structure is moving.
• Operating deflection shapes are functions of the modal
properties (frequencies, damping, and mode shapes) of
a structure. If the amounts and locations of excitation
forces are known, then modal properties can be used to
synthesize operating deflection shapes. For excitations
close to the modal frequencies of a structure, its mode
shapes will closely approximate its operating deflection
shapes, but only in "shape", not in value.
There are many other details associated with manipulation
of time and frequency domain measurement data, in order
to animate and compare the operating deflection shapes and
mode shapes of a structure. These will be presented in
forthcoming papers.
Page 8 of 8