Local Generalization of Pauli's Theorem
Local Generalization of Pauli's Theorem
Abstract. Generalized Pauli’s theorem, proved by D. S. Shirokov for two sets of anti-
commuting elements of a real or complexified Clifford algebra of dimension 2n , is extended
to the case, where both sets of elements depend smoothly on points of Euclidean space
of dimension r. We prove that in the case of even n there exists a smooth function such
that two sets of Clifford algebra elements are connected by a similarity transformation.
All cases of connection between two sets are considered in the case of odd n. Using the
equation for the spin connection of general form, it is shown that the problem of the local
Pauli’s theorem is equivalent to the problem of existence of a solution of some special
system of partial differential equations. The special cases n = 2, r ≥ 1 and n ≥ 2, r = 1
with simpler solution of the problem are considered in detail.
Key Words and Phrases: local Pauli’s theorem, Clifford algebra, field equation, spin
connection
2010 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 15A66, 53C05, 70S15
1. Introduction
g a g b + g b g a = 2η ab e, ha hb + hb ha = 2η ab e, a, b = 1, . . . , n,
∗
Corresponding author.
http://www.azjm.org 38
c 2010 AZJM All rights reserved.
Local Generalization of Pauli’s Theorem 39
In this paper, we generalize those statements to the case where both sets
of elements depend smoothly on the points of Euclidean space. We call these
generalized statements local generalized Pauli’s theorem.
First we show that the connection between two sets is local, in the neigh-
borhood of the point of Euclidean space. Then we generalize this statement to
the case of the entire Euclidean space under certain assumptions. We call the
obtained statement local, as is customary in differential geometry (statement is
called global if it holds for the entire non-trivial manifold, while Euclidean space
is a trivial manifold because it is covered by one chart).
Let us consider the real Clifford algebra C`R (p, q) := C`(p, q), n = p + q with
the generators ea , a = 1, . . . , n, and the basis of 2n elements
ea eb + eb ea = 2η ab e, a, b = 1, . . . , n,
where η ab are the elements of diagonal matrix η of order n with 1 and −1 ap-
pearing on the diagonal p and q times, respectively.
Let us consider the complexified Clifford algebra C`C (p, q) := C ⊗ C`R (p, q) [3],
[8]. These two cases C`F (p, q), F = R, C are important for various problems of
mathematical physics, in particular, in the study of the Dirac equation and the
Yang-Mills equations [9], [7], [5].
40 N.G. Marchuk, D.S. Shirokov
The subspace of C`F (p, q) spanned by the basis elements enumerated by the
ordered multi-indices of length k is denoted by C`Fk (p, q) and is called the subspace
of grade k. We have
n
M
C`F (p, q) = C`Fk (p, q).
k=0
Note that we have the important special case r = n, where the basis of V is
the set of generators ea . In this case, V can be considered as pseudo-Euclidean
space with two metrics (Euclidean and pseudo-Euclidean). We use Euclidean
metric to determine a neighborhood of a point.
Consider a function
f : Ω → C`F (p, q)
with values in C`F (p, q). The function f = f (x) can be written in the form
f = ue + ua ea + . . . + u1...n e1...n ,
where u = u(x), ua = ua (x), . . . are the functions Ω → F and the basis elements
(1) do not depend on x ∈ V .
If (real or complex) functions u, ua , . . . , u1...n have continuous derivatives up
to order k in Ω, then we say that the functions u, ua , . . . , u1...n and f belong to
the class C k (Ω) (C 0 (Ω) is the class of continuous functions in Ω).
Then for any point x0 ∈ Ω there exist ε > 0 and T = T (x) : Oε (x0 ) → C`F (p, q)
such that
Proof. Let us consider the special case where the elements g a = g a (x) are
equal to the generators ea of C`F (p, q), which do not depend on x. First we prove
the theorem for this case.
We denote the elements of the basis (1) by eA , where A are the ordered
multi-indices of the length between 0 and n. Denote eA = (eA )−1 .
Denote the elements
where Tr : C`F (p, q) → C`F0 (p, q) is the projection operation onto the subspace
C`F0 (p, q) and the operation of Hermitian conjugation † is defined in [4]. Using
(3), we get X
|Th | = | hA (x0 )Fh eA | = δh > 0.
A
of the class C k (Oεh (x0 )). By generalized Pauli’s theorem [12] we have
Similarly (replacing the symbol h by g), we can obtain the connection between
the elements ea and g a using the element Tg (x):
do not depend on x and are equal to ±e1...n or ±e (last case is possible only for
p − q = 1 mod 4).
Proof. Lemma 1 follows from the algebraic Pauli’s theorem (see [12]). J
do not depend on x and are equal to ±e (in the case p − q = 1 mod 4), ±ie (in
the case p − q = 3 mod 4), or ±e1...n (in both cases).
Proof. Lemma 2 follows from the algebraic Pauli’s theorem (see [12]). J
Proof. Proofs of Theorems 2 and 3 are similar to the proof of Theorem 1 and
we must use generalized Pauli’s theorems [12] for the Clifford algebra with odd
n.
First we prove the connection between the set ha = ha (x) and the set ea ,
a = 1, . . . , n, which does not depend on x. Instead of (2) we consider the following
expressions: X
hA (x)Fh eA
A:|A|=0 mod 2
where the sum is taken over the ordered multi-indices of even length |A|.
The element Fh does not depend on x because it is always among the basis
elements {eB } or among the expressions {eB + eC } (see [12]). All other consid-
erations are similar to the considerations for the case of even n.
Using the connection between the sets ha (x) and ea , the sets g a (x) and ea , we
obtain the connection between the sets g a (x) and ha (x) in some neighborhood of
the point x0 ∈ Ω. The theorem is proved. J
Note that the connection between the sets in the case of odd n (see Theorems
2 and 3) can be written for all cases in the following form:
As was shown above, the connection between two sets of elements satisfying
the defining anticommutative relations of Clifford algebra is realized in the form
of similarity transformation (or in other similar forms in the case of odd n) locally,
in the neighborhood of the corresponding point of Euclidean space. Does local
generalized Pauli’s theorem hold in the entire Euclidean space? Namely, does
there exist a function T = T (x) from Theorems 1, 2, and 3, which is invertible,
continuous, and connects two sets of elements ha (x), g a (x), a = 1, . . . , n for any
point x ∈ V ? In this section we prove the corresponding theorem under additional
assumptions (see conditions (5)).
Local Generalization of Pauli’s Theorem 45
In [5], [11], it is proved that the system (6) has a unique solution Cµ : V →
C`F (p, q) \ Cen(C`F (p, q)) of the following form:
2[ n
2
]
X 1
Cµ = µk π[h]k ((∂µ ha )ha ), µk = , ha := (ha )−1 ,
n − (−1)k (n − 2k)
k=1
(8)
where π[h]k : C`F (p, q)
→ C`F [h]k (p, q)
is the projection operation onto the sub-
space C`F [h]k (p, q) spanned over the basis elements ha1 ...ak with ordered multi-
indices of length k. Explicit expressions for the elements Cµ in the cases of
small n are given in [5] and [11]. We say that the solution (8) describes the spin
connection of general form.
If the generators ea of Clifford algebra, which do not depend on x, are con-
sidered as the expressions h́a (7), then the corresponding connection for these
elements given by the equations (6) is equal to zero: Ƶ = 0. Using (7), we get
The system of partial differential equations (9) with known Cµ (x) is considered
as a system for finding a function S = S(x), which is invertible in the entire
Euclidean space and connects two sets ha (x) and ea , a = 1, . . . , n. We have the
following theorem.
for all x ∈ V , where Cµ : V → C`F (p, q) \ Cen(C`F (p, q)) is a unique solution of
the system of equations:
∂µ ha − [Cµ , ha ] = 0, a = 1, . . . , n, µ = 1, . . . , r, (11)
and there exists a function T (x) = S(x)K (for some invertible element K ∈
C`F (p, q), which does not depend on x), which is also a solution of the system
(10) invertible in the entire Euclidean space and connects two sets of elements:
∂µ ha − [Cµ , ha ] = 0, a = 1, . . . , n, µ = 1, . . . , r (14)
∂µ Cν − ∂ν Cµ − [Cµ , Cν ] = 0, µ, ν = 1, . . . , r, ∀x ∈ V. (15)
Rµν := ∂µ Cν − ∂ν Cµ − [Cµ , Cν ]
is equal to zero, i.e. the connection Cµ is flat. It is known that every flat
connection on a simply-connected manifold is trivial, i.e. it can be represented
in the form Cµ = (∂µ S)S −1 for some function S = S(x) (see, for example, [15]).
Since Euclidean space is simply-connected, there exists a function S(t) invertible
in the entire Euclidean space which satisfies (10). Substituting the expression
Cµ = (∂µ S)S −1 into the equation (11), we get
Using SS −1 = e, we obtain
Multiplying both sides of the equation (16) from the left by S −1 , from the right
by S, and using (17), we get
∂µ (S −1 ha S) = 0, µ = 1, . . . , r. (18)
f a := S −1 ha S, a = 1, . . . , n
f a f b + f b f a = S −1 ha SS −1 hb S + S −1 hb SS −1 ha S = ha hb + hb ha = 2η ab e.
If the function S(x) is a solution of the system (10), then any function of the
form S(x)K, where the element K does not depend on x, is also a solution of
the system (10). By the algebraic generalized Pauli’s theorem [12], there is an
invertible element K ∈ C`F (p, q) such that
ea = K −1 f a K, a = 1, . . . , n
ea = f 1...n e1...n K −1 f a K, a = 1, . . . , n
T (x) = S(x)K
connects two sets of elements ea and ha (x), a = 1, . . . , n in the forms (12) and
(13). The theorem is proved. J
Note that Theorem 4 gives us an algorithm for computing the function S =
S(x). Using this algorithm and algorithm for computing the element K provided
by the algebraic Pauli’s theorem (see [12]), we obtain an algorithm for computing
the function T (x) = S(x)K, which connects two sets of elements ha (x), ea ,
a = 1, . . . , n.
Below we give two particular cases (Theorems 5 and 6) of the statement of
Theorem 4, in which the function T (x) has a simpler form. We give different
proofs of these theorems which do not use the fact that any flat connection on a
simply-connected manifold is trivial. In these particular cases, it is sufficient to
use the theory of matrix differential equations or the Poincare lemma.
The following theorem describes the local Pauli’s theorem in the case of Eu-
clidean space V = R1 of dimension r = dim V = 1.
Local Generalization of Pauli’s Theorem 49
T (x) = S(x)K,
where K ∈ C`F (p, q) is any element that does not depend on x. The function
T (x) = S(x)K for some invertible element K ∈ C`F (p, q) connects two sets of
elements in the form (19) in the case of even n and in the form (20) in the case
of odd n.
50 N.G. Marchuk, D.S. Shirokov
Note that the solution of the system (21) in the general case can be written in
the form of multiplicative integral (see [1]). In the case of additional conditions
[C1 (x1 ), C1 (x2 )] = 0 for any x1 , x2 ∈ R, the solution has a simpler form
Z x
S(x) = exp( C1 (x)dx)
x0
where Y = ||yba || means that the entry in the a-th row and b-th column of the
matrix Y is denoted by yba .
In the case ha : V → C`F1 (p, q), the unique solution (8) of the system of
equations:
∂µ ha − [Cµ , ha ] = 0, a = 1, . . . , n, µ = 1, . . . , r
Note that the subspace C`R2 (p, q) is the Lie algebra (with respect to the commu-
tator) of the spin group Spin+ (p, q) and the exponents of the elements of C`R 2 (p, q)
−1 a a b a
are elements of Spin+ (p, q) [3], [6]. The formula S e S = yb e =: h describes
two-sheeted covering of the orthogonal group SO+ (p, q) by the corresponding spin
group Spin+ (p, q): for each orthogonal matrix Y = ||yba || ∈ SO+ (p, q) there exist
two elements ±S ∈ Spin+ (p, q) of the corresponding spin group.
The following theorem describes the local Pauli’s theorem in the entire Eu-
clidean space in the case n = 2 for an arbitrary r with the additional assumption
ha : V → C`F1 (p, q), a = 1, 2.
1
dC(x) = C1 (x)dx1 + · · · + Cr (x)dxr , Cµ (x) = (∂µ ha )ha .
4
Moreover, the function
T (x) = exp(C(x))K
satisfies
ea = T −1 (x)ha (x)T (x), a = 1, 2, ∀x ∈ V,
for some invertible element of Clifford algebra K ∈ C`F (p, q).
Proof. As mentioned before the theorem, if ha : V → C`F1 (p, q), then the
functions Cµ , µ = 1, . . . , r take values in the subspace C`F2 (p, q) (see [7]).
In the case n = 2, all elements of the subspace C`F2 (p, q) have the form λe12 ,
λ ∈ F. Hence all the functions Cµ : V → C`F2 (p, q) commute with each other:
As mentioned above, in [5], [11], it is proved that the system of equations (14)
implies (15). Thus, by (15), the conditions (27) are equivalent to
∂ µ Cν = ∂ ν Cµ , µ, ν = 1, . . . , r, ∀x ∈ V. (28)
a 0-form C(x) such that dC(x) = L(x). By (28), it follows that there exists a
function C(x) : V → C`F2 (p, q) such that
Thus, under the conditions (28), the system of equations (10) can be written in
the form
This series is always convergent and invertible (see, for example, [1]):
Since Cµ (x) : V → C`F2 (p, q), we conclude that C(x) also takes values in C`F2 (p, q).
The functions C k (x), k = 1, 2, . . ., and exp(C(x)) take values in C`F0 (p, q) ⊕
C`F2 (p, q). In the Clifford algebra of dimension n = 2 we have [C`F0 (p, q) ⊕ C`F2 (p, q),
C`F2 (p, q)] = 0, and hence
[C k (x), ∂µ C(x)] = 0, ∀k = 1, 2, . . . ,
which is a sufficient condition for the validity of for the following formula (see
[1]):
S(x) = exp(C(x))K
is a solution of the system (29) invertible in the entire Euclidean space for any
invertible element K ∈ C`F (p, q) that does not depend on x:
Using the algebraic Pauli’s theorem, we conclude that for some invertible K ∈
C`F (p, q) the function T (x) = exp(C(x))K connects two sets:
1 ∂µ ϕ 12
Cµ = (∂µ ha )ha = − e .
4 2
ϕ(x) ϕ(x) 12
S(x) = exp(C(x))K = (cos( ) e − sin( ) e )K,
2 2
where K is an arbitrary element of Clifford algebra that does not depend on x.
We take T (x) = exp(C(x))K for some invertible element K. In the first case (32),
we take K = e, in the second case (33), we take K = e12 . The element T (x) is
invertible for any x ∈ V and connects two sets of elements ea = T −1 (x)ha (x)T (x),
∀x ∈ V . Indeed, it is easy to verify that
ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ
(cos e + sin e12 )(cos ϕ e1 + sin ϕ e2 )(cos e − sin e12 ) = e1 ,
2 2 2 2
ϕ ϕ 12 ϕ ϕ
(cos e + sin e )(− sin ϕ e + cos ϕ e )(cos e − sin e12 ) = e2 .
1 2
2 2 2 2
2) The case of real Clifford algebra C`R (0, 2) is considered similarly. We have
two cases: (32) and (33). In both cases, we get
1 ∂µ ϕ 12
Cµ = (∂µ ha )ha = e
4 2
and
ϕ(x) ϕ(x) 12
T (x) = exp(C(x))K = (cos( ) e + sin( ) e )K,
2 2
which satisfies ea = T −1 (x)ha (x)T (x), ∀x ∈ V for some invertible K.
54 N.G. Marchuk, D.S. Shirokov
3) In the case of real Clifford algebra C`R (1, 1) we have four cases (since the
group O(1, 1) has four connected components):
h1 = cosh ϕ e1 + sinh ϕ e2 , h2 = sinh ϕ e1 + cosh ϕ e2 ;
h1 = cosh ϕ e1 + sinh ϕ e2 , h2 = − sinh ϕ e1 − cosh ϕ e2 ;
h1 = − cosh ϕ e1 − sinh ϕ e2 , h2 = sinh ϕ e1 + cosh ϕ e2 ;
h1 = − cosh ϕ e1 − sinh ϕ e2 , h2 = − sinh ϕ e1 − cosh ϕ e2 .
In all cases, we have
1 ∂µ ϕ 12
Cµ = (∂µ ha )ha = − e
4 2
and
ϕ(x) ϕ(x) 12
T (x) = exp(C(x))K = (cosh( ) e − sinh( ) e )K,
2 2
which satisfies ea = T −1 (x)ha (x)T (x), ∀x ∈ V for some invertible K.
4) Let us consider the case of real Clifford algebra C`R (3, 0) and functions
ha : V → C`F1 (3, 0) satisfying the relations (4), ha = yba eb . For simplicity, we
consider the case of matrix Y = ||yba || ∈ O(3) with the determinant det Y = 1.
In this case, the matrix Y ∈ SO(3) can be parameterized by three Euler angles
ϕ(x), ψ(x), θ(x), depending on x. We have 0 ≤ ϕ, ψ < 2π, 0 ≤ θ < π.
The matrix Y has the form
cos ϕ cos ψ cos θ − sin ϕ sin ψ − cos ϕ sin ψ cos θ − sin ϕ cos ψ cos ϕ sin θ
sin ϕ cos ψ cos θ + cos θ sin ψ sin ϕ sin ψ cos θ + cos ϕ cos ψ sin ϕ sin θ .
− cos ψ sin θ sin ψ sin θ cos θ
We get
1 1
Cµ = (∂µ ha )ha = ((cos θ ∂µ ϕ + ∂µ ψ)e12 +
4 2
+(− sin ψ sin θ ∂µ ϕ − cos ψ ∂µ θ)e13 + (cos ψ sin θ ∂µ ϕ + sin ψ ∂µ θ)e23 ).
In this example, we obtain [Cµ , Cν ] 6= 0, and therefore ∂µ Cν 6= ∂ν Cµ and the
Poincare lemma is not applicable, unlike the case n = 2.
Problems related to the local Pauli’s theorem are useful in field theory, in the
study of the Dirac equation [9] and the Yang-Mills equations [7], [11]. In [11], a
class of covariantly constant solutions of the Yang-Mills equations is proposed.
The connection between these solutions and constant solutions is described by
the local Pauli’s theorem.
An interesting question is whether the Pauli’s theorem is valid on the curved
manifolds. Our hypothesis is that the Pauli’s theorem will be true only in some
particular cases (see Theorems 5 and 6) depending on n, dimension of the mani-
fold r, or topological properties of the manifold (simply connectedness).
Local Generalization of Pauli’s Theorem 55
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to N. Hitchin and M. Katanaev for useful discussions.
The authors are, also grateful to the reviewers for carefully reading this paper and
helpful remarks. This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation
(project 18-71-00010).
References
[1] F.R. Gantmacher, The theory of matrices, GITTL, Moscow, 1953. (in Rus-
sian)
[3] P. Lounesto, Clifford Algebras and Spinors, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam-
bridge, 1997.
[4] N.G. Marchuk, D.S. Shirokov, Unitary spaces on Clifford algebras, Advances
in Applied Clifford Algebras, 18(2), 2008.
[5] N.G. Marchuk, D.S. Shirokov, General solutions of one class of field equa-
tions, Rep. Math. Phys., 78(3), 2016, 305-326.
[6] N.G. Marchuk, D.S. Shirokov, Introduction to the theory of Clifford algebras,
Phasis, Moscow, 2012. (in Russian)
[7] N.G. Marchuk, On a field equation generating a new class of particular so-
lutions to the Yang-Mills equations, Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of
Mathematics, 2014, Vol. 285, 197-210.
Nikolay G. Marchuk
Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, Moscow, Russia
E-mail: [email protected]
Dmitry S. Shirokov
National Research University Higher School of Economics, 101000, Moscow, Russia
Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems of Russian Academy of Sciences,
127051, Moscow, Russia
E-mail: [email protected]