Massachusetts Institute of Technology ESG Physics: PE KE
Massachusetts Institute of Technology ESG Physics: PE KE
ESG Physics
Problem 1: 25.14
An insulating rod having linear charge density and linear mass density µ = 0.100 kg/m is
released from rest in a uniform electric field E = 100 V/m directed perpendicular to the
rod (Fig. P25.14).
Fig. P25.14
(a) Determine the speed of the rod after it has traveled 2.00 m.
(b) How does your answer to part (a) change if the electric field is not perpendicular
to the rod? Explain.
Solution:
(a) When the rod is moving along the electric field, it is moving from a high potential
point to a low potential point, so the rod is going to lose potential energy. And by
conservation of energy, the lost in potential energy is the same as the gain in kinetic
energy. Thus
If the rod travels a distance s along the electric field, the potential difference from the
starting point to the end point would be
∆V = Es (1.2)
Suppose the rod has its length l, then the charge of the rod is given by
Qrod = λ l (1.3)
mrod = µ l (1.5)
1
λlEs = ( µl ) v2 (1.6)
2
which gives
2λ Es
v= (1.7)
µ
(b) The speed would be the same as part (a), since the electric field is a conservative field,
that the work done by the field (the potential energy) does not depend on the path that it
takes.
Fig. P25.15
The particle, string, and pivot point all lie on a horizontal table. The particle is released
from rest when the string makes an angle θ = 60.0° with a uniform electric field of
magnitude E = 300 V/m . Determine the speed of the particle when the string is parallel
to the electric field (point a in Fig. 25.15).
Solution:
The potential difference between the initial point and the end point would just be the
product of the electric field and the “perpendicular distance” between the two points,
therefore,
∆V = − E ( L − L cos θ ) (2.1)
Thus, having the charge q, the charge would lose a potential energy of magnitude
And by conservation of energy, this would be the gain in kinetic energy, thus
1 2
mv = qEL (1 − cos θ ) (2.3)
2
2qEL (1 − cos θ )
v= (2.4)
m
Fig. P25.30
(a) Plot a graph of the potential at points along the x axis over the interval
kQ
−3a < x < 3a . You should plot the potential in units of e .
a
(b) Let the charge located at − a be negative and plot the potential along the y axis
over the interval −4a < y < 4a .
Solution:
which gives
ϕ ( x) 2
= (3.2)
ke Q 2
x
+a
a a
which gives
ϕ ( y) 1 1
= − (3.4)
ke Q y y
−1 +1
a a a
In Rutherford’s famous scattering experiments that led to the planetary model of the atom,
alpha particles (charge +2e , mass = 6.64 × 10−27 kg ) were fired at a gold nucleus (charge
+79e). An alpha particle, initially very far from the gold nucleus, is fired with a velocity
of 2.00 ×107 m/s directly toward the center of the nucleus. How close does the alpha
particle get to this center before turning around? Assume the gold nucleus remains
stationary.
Solution:
We apply the law of energy conservation again. The alpha particles have kinetic energy
at the beginning. So if the direction is head on, that means that the alpha particle would
stop at the point where it loses all its kinetic energy in order to gain the potential energy
required for it to reach that point. We know that for a point charge, the potential at a point
r away from the gold nucleus is
keQgold
Vr = (4.1)
r
Thus, for the alpha particle to reach a point R away from the gold nucleus,
keQgold
PE = qalpha (4.2)
R
1 2 Q q
mv = ke gold alpha (4.3)
2 R
Rearranging, we have
2keQgold qalpha
R= (4.4)
mv 2
which gives
Rmin = 2.74 ×10−14 m (4.5)
for points outside the sphere, where V0 is the (constant) electric potential on the
conductor. Use this equation to determine the x, y, and z components of the resulting
electric field.
Solution:
We know that, since this a conducting sphere, there is no charge inside the sphere, and
thus the electric field inside the sphere is zero, according to Gauss’s Law.
For x, y, z > a , we can obtain the electric field in the three coordinate by taking the
partial derivative of the potential respect to the according coordinate, that is
∂V ∂V ∂V
Ex = − , Ey = − , Ez = − (5.2)
∂x ∂y ∂z
which gives
3E0 a 3 xz 3E0 a 3 yz E0 a 3 ( 2 z 2 − x 2 − y 2 )
E = Ex i + E y j + Ez k = 5
i+ 5
j + E0 + 5 k (5.3)
(x 2
+y +z
2
)
2 2
(x 2
+y +z
2
)
2 2
( x + y + z )
2 2 2 2
Fig. P25.45
Solution:
Fig. P25.46
Solution:
to calculate the potential at that point, that is we want to know what is the contribution to
the potential at point O by each small bit of charge dq along the line of charge. As shown
above, the line of charge can be divided into three parts, and each part would have
different representation of the formula (7.1). Consider the straight part, which is the part
on the left and on the right, we have
dq λ dx
dϕ = = (7.2)
r x
dq λ dl λ R dθ
dϕ = = = = λ dθ (7.3)
r R R
Therefore, we have
−R λ dx 0 3R λ dx
ϕ=∫ + ∫ λ dθ + ∫ (7.4)
−3 R x −π R x
which gives
ϕ = ke λ (π + 2 ln 3) (7.5)
Fig. 25.50
Solution:
Since this is a conductor, and we know that charge only resides on the surface. Since the
two shells are connected by a wire, the charge would go as outside as possible, so the
charge would just go to the outer sphere. As a result, there would be no charge on the
inner sphere, and 10.0 µ C on the outer sphere.
Solution:
Consider a bit of charge dq which situates at x away from the origin, then it would have a
distance x 2 + b 2 to the point P. We know that
dq λ dx
dϕ = = (9.1)
r x2 + b2
a +l λ dx
ϕ=∫ (9.2)
a
x2 + b2
which gives
a + l + ( a + l )2 + b 2
ϕ = ke λ ln (9.3)
a + a 2 + b2