How To Learn Physics More Advanced Math
How To Learn Physics More Advanced Math
Introduction
How to Learn Physics
How to Learn Math
More Advanced Math
Introduction
"How to learn math and physics" — the title is deliberately provocative. Everyone has to learn their own way. I
don't know how you should learn math and physics. But presumably you came here looking for advice, so I'll
give you some.
My advice is aimed at people who are interested in fundamental theoretical physics and the math that goes along
with that. (By "fundamental" physics I mean the search for the basic laws concerning matter and the forces of
nature.) If you want to do experiments instead of theory, or other kinds physics like condensed matter physics
and astrophysics, or math that has nothing to do with physics, my advice will be of limited use. You should still
learn the basics I mention here, but after that you'll have to look elsewhere for suggestions.
Learning math and physics takes a whole lifetime. Luckily, it's a lot of fun... if you have a reasonably patient
attitude. A lot of people read pop books about quantum mechanics, black holes, or Gödel's theorem, and
immediately want to study those subjects. Without the necessary background, they soon become frustrated — or
worse, flaky.
It can be even more dangerous if you want to plunge into grand unified theories, or superstrings, or M-theory.
Nobody knows if these theories are true! And it's hard to evaluate their claims until you know what people do
know.
So, especially when it comes to physics, I urge you to start with slightly less glamorous stuff that we know to be
true — at least as a useful approximation, that is — and then, with a solid background, gradually work your way
up to the frontiers of knowledge. Even if you give up at some point, you'll have learned something worthwhile.
This webpage doesn't have lots of links to websites. Websites just don't have the sort of in-depth material you
need to learn technical subjects like advanced math and physics — at least, not yet. To learn this stuff, you need
to read lots of books. I will list some of my favorites below, and also some you can get free online.
But, you can't learn math and physics just by reading books! You have to do lots of calculations yourself — or
experiments, if you want to do experimental physics. Textbooks are full of homework problems, and it's good to
do these. It's also important to make up your own research topics and work on those.
If you can afford it, there's really nothing better than taking courses in math and physics. The advantage of
courses is that you get to hear lectures, meet students and professors, and do some things you otherwise wouldn't
— like work your butt off.
It's also crucial to ask people questions and explain things to people — both of these are great ways to learn
stuff. Nothing beats sitting in a cafe with a friend, notebooks open, and working together on a regular basis. Two
minds are more than twice as good as one!
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 1/12
6/27/2020 books
But if you can't find a friend in your town, there are different ways to talk to people online. In all cases, it's good
to spend some time quietly getting to know the local customs before plunging in and talking. For example,
trying to start a rambling discussion on a question-and-answer website is no good. Here are some options:
Question-and-Answer Websites — If you've got physics questions, try Physics Stack Exchange. For
research-level questions, try Physics Overflow. For questions about math, try Math Stack Exchange, or for
research-level questions, Math Overflow.
Discussion Forums — To get into discussions of physics, try sci.physics.research. For math, try sci.math
or, for research-level questions, sci.math.research. I also recommend Physics Forums for both math and
physics discussions. At least some of the question-and-answer websites listed above also have community
forums where you can discuss things.
There are also lots of interesting blogs and free math books online.
Finally, it's crucial to admit you're wrong when you screw up. We all make tons of mistakes when we're learning
stuff. If you don't admit this, you will gradually turn into a crackpot who clutches on to a stupid theory even
when everyone else in the world can see that it's wrong. It's a tragic fate, because you can't even see it's
happening. Even bigshot professors at good universities can become crackpots once they stop admitting their
mistakes.
To avoid looking like a fool, it's really good to get into the habit of making it clear whether you know something
for sure, or are just guessing. It's not so bad to be wrong if you said right from the start that you weren't sure.
But if you act confident and turn out to be wrong, you look dumb.
In short: stay humble, keep studying, and you'll keep making progress. Don't give up — the fun is in the process.
Classical mechanics
Statistical mechanics
Electromagnetism
Special relativity
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 2/12
6/27/2020 books
and
Quantum mechanics
in roughly that order. Once you know these, you have the background to learn the two best theories we have:
and
And once you know these, you'll be ready to study current attempts to unify quantum field theory and general
relativity.
If this seems like a lot of work... well, it is! It's a lot of fun, too, but it's bound to be tiring at times. So, it's also
good to read some histories of physics. They're a nice change of pace, they're inspiring, and they can show you
the "big picture" that sometimes gets hidden behind the thicket of equations. These are some of my favorites
histories:
Emilio Segre, From Falling Bodies to Radio Waves: Classical Physicists and Their Discoveries, W. H.
Freeman, New York, 1981.
Emilio Segre, From X-Rays to Quarks: Modern Physicists and Their Discoveries, W. H. Freeman, San
Francisco, 1980.
Robert P. Crease and Charles C. Mann, The Second Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Twentieth-
Century Physics, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 1996.
Abraham Pais, Inward Bound: of Matter and Forces in the Physical World, Clarendon Press, New York,
1986. (More technical.)
Next, here are some good books to learn "the real stuff". These aren't "easy" books, but they're my favorites.
Classical mechanics:
Herbert Goldstein, Charles Poole, and John Safko, Classical Mechanics, Addison Wesley, San Francisco,
2002.
Statistical mechanics:
F. Reif, Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics, McGraw Hill, New York, 1965.
Electromagnetism:
Special relativity:
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 3/12
6/27/2020 books
Edwin F. Taylor, John A. Wheeler, Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity, W. H. Freeman
Press, 1992.
Quantum mechanics:
Anthony Sudbery, Quantum Mechanics and the Particles of Nature: an Outline for Mathematicians,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986. (Not just for mathematicians!)
Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu und Franck Laloë, Quantum Mechanics (2 volumes), Wiley-
Interscience, 1992. (I haven't actually read this, but it's widely respected for its systematic approach.)
These should be supplemented by the general textbooks above, which cover all these topics. In particular,
Feynman's Lectures on Physics are incredibly valuable.
After you know this stuff well, you're ready for general relativity (which gets applied to cosmology) and
quantum field theory (which gets applied to particle physics).
General relativity — to get intuition for the subject before tackling the details:
Kip S. Thorne, Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy, W. W. Norton, New York,
1994.
Robert M. Wald, Space, Time, and Gravity: the Theory of the Big Bang and Black Holes, University of
Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977.
Robert Geroch, General Relativity from A to B, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978.
Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne and John Archibald Wheeler, Gravitation, W. H. Freeman Press, San
Francisco, 1973.
Robert M. Wald, General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984.
Cosmology:
Edward R. Harrison, Cosmology, the Science of the Universe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1981.
M. Berry, Cosmology and Gravitation, Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1986.
John A. Peacock, Cosmological Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999. (More technical.)
Quantum field theory — to get intuition for the subject before tackling the details:
Richard Feynman, QED: the Strange Theory of Light and Matter, Princeton University Press, Princeton,
1985.
Michael E. Peskin and Daniel V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Addison-Wesley,
New York, 1995. (The best modern textbook, in my opinion.)
A. Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2003. (Packed with
wisdom told in a charmingly informal manner; not the best way to learn how to calculate stuff.)
Warren Siegel, Fields, available for free on the arXiv.
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 4/12
6/27/2020 books
Mark Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory, available free on his website. (It's good to snag free textbooks
while you can, if they're not on the arXiv!)
Sidney Coleman, Physics 253: Quantum Field Theory, 1975-1976. (Not a book — it's a class! You can
download free videos of this course at Harvard, taught by a brash and witty young genius.)
Quantum field theory — two classic older texts that cover a lot of material not found in Peskin and Schroeder's
streamlined modern presentation:
James D. Bjorken and Sidney D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1964.
James D. Bjorken and Sidney D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Fields, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1965.
Robin Ticciati, Quantum Field Theory for Mathematicians, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1999.
Richard Borcherds and Alex Barnard, Lectures On Quantum Field Theory.
Particle physics:
Kerson Huang, Quarks, Leptons & Gauge Fields, World Scientific, Singapore, 1982.
L. B. Okun, Leptons and Quarks, translated from Russian by V. I. Kisin, North-Holland, 1982. (Huang's
book is better on mathematical aspects of gauge theory and topology; Okun's book is better on what we
actually observe particles to do.)
T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood, 1981.
K. Grotz and H. V. Klapdor, The Weak Interaction in Nuclear, Particle, and Astrophysics, Hilger, Bristol,
1990.
While studying general relativity and quantum field theory, you should take a break now and then and dip into
this book: it's a wonderful guided tour of the world of math and physics:
Roger Penrose, The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, Knopf, New York,
2005.
This is a reasonable treatment of an important but incredibly controversial topic. Warning: there's no way to
understand the interpretation of quantum mechanics without also being able to solve quantum mechanics
problems — to understand the theory, you need to be able to use it (and vice versa). If you don't heed this advice,
you'll fall prey to all sorts of nonsense that's floating around out there.
Josef M. Jauch, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, 1968. (Very thoughtful and literate.
Get a taste of quantum logic.)
George Mackey, The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Dover, New York, 1963.
(Especially good for mathematicians who only know a little physics.)
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 5/12
6/27/2020 books
String theory:
Barton Zwiebach, A First Course in String Theory, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 2004. (The best easy
introduction.)
Katrin Becker, Melanie Becker and John H. Schwartz, String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern
Introduction, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 2007. (A more detailed introduction.)
Michael B. Green, John H. Schwarz and Edward Witten, Superstring Theory (2 volumes), Cambridge U.
Press, Cambridge, 1987. (The old testament.)
Joseph Polchinski, String Theory (2 volumes), Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1998. (The new testament
— he's got branes.)
After basic schooling, the customary track through math starts with a bit of:
and
Probability theory
To dig deeper into math you need calculus and linear algebra, which are interconnected:
Calculus
Multivariable calculus
Linear algebra
Complex analysis
Real analysis
Topology
Abstract algebra
not necessarily in exactly this order. Proofs become very important at this stage. You need to know a little set
theory and logic to really understand what a proof is, but you don't even need calculus to get started on
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 6/12
6/27/2020 books
Number theory
From then on, the study of math branches out into a dizzying variety of more advanced topics! It's hard to get the
"big picture" of mathematics until you've gone fairly far into it; indeed, the more I learn, the more I laugh at my
previous pathetically naive ideas of what math is "all about". But if you want a glimpse, try these books:
I haven't decided on my favorite books on all the basic math topics, but here are a few. In this list I'm trying to
pick the clearest books I know, not the deepest ones — you'll want to dig deeper later:
Arthur T. Benjamin and Jennifer Quinn, Proofs that Really Count: The Art of Combinatorial Proof, The
Mathematical Association of America, 2003.
Ronald L. Graham, Donald Knuth, and Oren Patashnik, Concrete Mathematics, Addison-Wesley, Reading,
Massachusetts, 1994. (Too advanced for a first course in finite mathematics, but this book is fun — quirky,
full of jokes, it'll teach you tricks for counting stuff that will blow your friends minds!)
Probability theory:
Charles M. Grinstead and J. Laurie Snell, Introduction to Probability, American Mathematical Society,
Providence, Rhode Island, 1997. Also available free online at
https://math.dartmouth.edu/~prob/prob/prob.pdf.
Calculus:
Silvanus P. Thompson, Calculus Made Easy, St. Martin's Press, 1914. Also available free online at
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33283. (Most college calculus texts weigh a ton; this one does not — it
just gets to the point. This is how I learned calculus: my uncle gave me a copy.)
Gilbert Strang, Calculus, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1991. Also available free online at
http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/resources/Strang/strangtext.htm. (Another classic, with lots of applications to
real-world problems.)
Multivariable calculus:
Linear algebra:
This is a great linear algebra book if you want to understand the subject thoroughly:
Elizabeth S. Meckes and Mark Meckes, Linear Algebra, Cambridge U. Press, 2018.
Herbert B. Enderton, Elements of Set Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1977.
Herbert B. Enderton, A Mathematical Introduction to Logic, Academic Press, New York, 2000.
F. William Lawvere and Robert Rosebrugh, Sets for Mathematics, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 2002.
(An unorthodox choice, since this book takes an approach based on category theory instead of the old-
fashioned Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms. But this is the wave of the future, so you might as well hop on now!)
Complex analysis:
Real analysis:
Richard R. Goldberg, Methods of Real Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1976. (A gentle introduction.)
Halsey L. Royden, Real Analysis, Prentice Hall, New York, 1988. (A bit more deep; here you get
Lebesgue integration and measure spaces.)
Topology:
James R. Munkres, Topology, James R. Munkres, Prentice Hall, New York, 1999.
Lynn Arthur Steen and J. Arthur Seebach, Jr., Counterexamples in Topology, Dover, New York, 1995. (It's
fun to see how crazy topological spaces can get: also, counterexamples help you understand definitions
and theorems. But, don't get fooled into thinking this stuff is the point of topology!)
Abstract algebra:
I didn't like abstract algebra as an undergrad. Now I love it! Textbooks that seem pleasant now seemed dry as
dust back then. So, I'm not confident that I could recommend an all-around textbook on algebra that my earlier
self would have enjoyed. But, I would have liked these:
Hermann Weyl, Symmetry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1983. (Before diving into
group theory, find out why it's fun.)
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 8/12
6/27/2020 books
Ian Stewart, Galois Theory, 3rd edition, Chapman and Hall, New York, 2004. (A fun-filled introduction to
a wonderful application of group theory that's often explained very badly.)
Number theory:
These are elementary textbooks; for more advanced ones read on further.
George E. Andews, Number Theory, Dover, New York, 1994. (A good elementary introduction; don't buy
the Kindle version of this edition since the equations are tiny.)
Joseph Silverman, Friendly Introduction to Number Theory, Pearson, 2017. (Doesn't require any advanced
mathematics, not even calculus.)
Martin H. Weissman, An Illustrated Theory of Numbers, American Mathematical Society, Providence,
Rhode Island, 2017. (This reveals the oft-hidden visual side of number theory.)
Paul Bamberg and Shlomo Sternberg, A Course of Mathematics for Students of Physics, Cambridge
University, Cambridge, 1982. (A good basic introduction to modern math, actually.)
It's also good to get ahold of these books and keep referring to them as needed:
Shlomo Sternberg, Group Theory and Physics, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Robert Hermann, Lie Groups for Physicists, Benjamin-Cummings, 1966.
George Mackey, Unitary Group Representations in Physics, Probability, and Number Theory, Addison-
Wesley, Redwood City, California, 1989.
Lie groups, Lie algebras and their representations — in rough order of increasing sophistication:
Brian Hall, Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations, Springer, Berlin, 2003.
William Fulton and Joe Harris, Representation Theory — a First Course, Springer, Berlin, 1991. (A
friendly introduction to finite groups, Lie groups, Lie algebras and their representations, including the
classification of simple Lie algebras. One great thing is that it has many pictures of root systems, and
works slowly up a ladder of examples of these before blasting the reader with abstract generalities.)
J. Frank Adams, Lectures on Lie Groups, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2004. (A very elegant
introduction to the theory of semisimple Lie groups and their representations, without the morass of
notation that tends to plague this subject. But it's a bit terse, so you may need to look at other books to see
what's really going on in here!)
Daniel Bump, Lie Groups, Springer, Berlin, 2004. (A friendly tour of the vast and fascinating panorama of
mathematics surrounding groups, starting from really basic stuff and working on up to advanced topics.
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 9/12
6/27/2020 books
The nice thing is that it explains stuff without feeling the need to prove every statement, so it can cover
more territory.)
Gregory L. Naber, Topology, Geometry and Gauge Fields: Foundations, Springer, Berlin, 1997.
Chris Isham, Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists, World Scientific Press, Singapore, 1999.
(Isham is an expert on general relativity so this is especially good if you want to study that.)
Harley Flanders, Differential Forms with Applications to the Physical Sciences, Dover, New York, 1989.
(Everyone has to learn differential forms eventually, and this is a pretty good place to do it.)
Charles Nash and Siddhartha Sen, Topology and Geometry for Physicists, Academic Press, 1983. (This
emphasizes the physics motivations... it's not quite as precise at points.)
Mikio Nakahara, Geometry, Topology, and Physics, A. Hilger, New York, 1990. (More advanced.)
Charles Nash, Differential Topology and Quantum Field Theory, Academic Press, 1991. (Still more
advanced — essential if you want to understand what Witten is up to.)
Victor Guillemin and Alan Pollack, Differential Topology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1974.
B. A. Dubrovin, A. T. Fomenko, and S. P. Novikov, Modern Geometry — Methods and Applications, 3
volumes, Springer, Berlin, 1990. (Lots of examples, great for building intuition, some mistakes here and
there. The third volume is an excellent course on algebraic topology from a geometrical viewpoint.)
Algebraic topology:
Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 2002. Also available free at
http://www.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/ATpage.html. (An excellent modern introduction.)
Peter May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, U. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999. Also available
free at http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/CONCISE/ConciseRevised.pdf. (More intense.)
Michael Reed and Barry Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics (4 volumes), Academic Press,
1980.
Knot theory:
Homological algebra:
Joseph Rotman, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Academic Press, New York, 1979. (A good
introduction to an important but sometimes intimidating branch of math.)
Charles Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1994.
(Despite having the same title as the previous book, this goes into many more advanced topics.)
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 10/12
6/27/2020 books
Combinatorics:
Herbert Wilf, Generatinfunctionology, Academic Press, 1994. (Tons of fun and also available free online
at https://www.math.upenn.edu/~wilf/DownldGF.html. It's good to read this after Concrete Mathematics
by Graham, Knuth and Pataschnik, listed above under combinatorics.)
Richard P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, two volumes, Cambridge U. Press, 1997. (Packed with
great exercises; volume one is also available free online at http://www-math.mit.edu/~rstan/ec/ec1.pdf.)
Algebraic geometry:
I found Hartshorne quite off-putting the first ten times I tried to read it. I think it's better to start by getting to
know some 'classical' algebraic geometry so you see why the subject is interesting and why it's called 'geometry'
before moving on to delightful modern abstractions like schemes. So, start with this introduction:
Karen E. Smith, Lauri Kahanpää, Pekka Kekäläinen and William Traves, An Invitation to Algebraic
Geometry, Springer, Berlin, 2004.
Igor R. Shafarevich, Basic Algebraic Geometry, two volumes, third edition, Springer, 2013.
David Eisenbud and Joseph Harris, The Geometry of Schemes, Springer, 2006.
Phillip Griffiths and Joseph Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, 1994. (Especially nice if you like
complex analysis, differential geometry and de Rham theory.)
Number theory:
Kenneth Ireland and Keith Rosen, A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory, second edition,
Springer, 1998. (A good way to catch up on some classic results in number theory while getting a taste of
modern methods.)
Yu. I. Manin and Alexei A. Panchishkin, Introduction to Modern Number Theory: Fundamental Problems,
Ideas and Theories, Springer, 2007. (Much more hard-hitting, but a very useful overview of what modern
number theory is like.)
Jürgen Neukirch, Algebraic Number Theory, Springer, 2010. (A friendly introduction to class field
theory.)
Category theory:
Brendan Fong and David Spivak, Seven Sketches in Compositionality: An Invitation to Applied Category
Theory. (A good first introduction to category theory through applications; available free online at
http://math.mit.edu/~dspivak/teaching/sp18/7Sketches.pdf. Also see the website with videos and my
online course based on this book.)
Tom Leinster, Basic Category Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 143, Cambridge
U. Press, 2014. Also available for free on the arXiv. (A introduction for beginners that focuses on three
key concepts and how they're related: adjoint functor, representable functors, and limits.)
Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Dover, New York, 2016. Also available for free on her website.
(More advanced. As the title suggests, this gives many examples of how category theory is applied to
other subjects in math.)
I have always imagined that Paradise will be a kind of library. - Jorge Luis Borges
[email protected]
© 2019 John Baez
home
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 11/12
6/27/2020 books
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html#math 12/12