Carnicom Institute: Geoengineering Research
Carnicom Institute: Geoengineering Research
2001 - Part 1
Acknowledgements
Mission Statement:
Disclaimer:
License:
Jan
PARTICULATE PHOTOGRAPHS
Jan 4, 2001
PARTICULATE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Jan 04 2001
Clifford E Carnicom
The following are video stills extracted from a video segment made on Jan 03 2001 in Santa Fe
NM. The evidence provided by these images further substantiates those demands which now
exist for a formal investigation into drastic atmospheric changes which, by all evidence available,
are a direct result of aircraft aerosol operations imposed without citizen consent.
1
Jan
PARTICULATE PHOTOGRAPHS
Video still which shows the arrangement of the sun and position
of the viewer at a low level of magnification.
2
Jan
PARTICULATE PHOTOGRAPHS
3
Jan
PARTICULATE PHOTOGRAPHS
4
Jan
PARTICULATE PHOTOGRAPHS
Full credit for the methods and observations recorded on this page are extended to a member of
the message board by the name of “Looookinup”, as well as to several other members that have
substantiated the efforts made to identify particulate matter now readily visible in our skies.
Please use extreme caution within any efforts to duplicate these observations, especially if
magnifying optics are being used. It is essential that the sun never be viewed directly, especially
with magnification. The corona of the sun is what will make the particles visible.
Future research methods will include direct filtering of the atmosphere. Current research
indicates that the most likely size of the particles being observed is on the order of sub-micron to
several microns in size. The role of the so-called “plasma frequency” is also under investigation.
Particles appear to be white, highly reflective, electrically charged and likely of a metallic nature.
Citizens, professionals and activists across the country are encouraged to participate in this
nationwide effort of research, disclosure and establishment of accountability. Direct demands to
Christine Todd Whitman, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency,
for a formal investigation into the evidence available thus far are also invited. Carol M. Browner,
the previous EPA administrator, has recently reiterated the claim that this national agency for
public welfare remains “unaware” of any aircraft aerosol operations occurring within our skies.
Clifford E Carnicom
Jan 04 2001
5
Jan
EPA PERPETUALLY "UNAWARE"
EPA PERPETUALLY
“UNAWARE”
Jan 09 2001
Clifford E Carnicom
The following letter has recently been received from the office of Carol M. Browner, Administrator
of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This further records the state of unawareness that
Carol M. Browner remains in, despite initial notification of accumulating evidence on the aerosol
issue on Dec 09, 1999, more than one year ago. A chronology of the communication between
David Peterson, myself, and the EPA is available on this website. Throughout the last year
several correspondences have been received which continue to use the phrase that the EPA is
“unaware” of any aircraft aerosol operations being conducted across the nation. In addition,
Carol M. Browner and the office of the EPA refuses to acknowledge the existence of a physical
sample sent to her by certified mail on June 20, 2000, and there remains a patent refusal to
identify that material as requested and to release the results of such testing to the American
public.
Clifford E Carnicom
Jan 09 2001
6
Jan
EPA PERPETUALLY "UNAWARE"
7
Jan
EPA PERPETUALLY "UNAWARE"
8
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
EASTLUND BARIUM
REFERENCE
from
[Link]
================================================================
MindNet Journal – Vol. 1, No. 51
================================================================
V E R I C O M M / MindNet “Quid veritas est?”
================================================================
The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
otherwise noted.
================================================================
[HAARP]
Eastlund
—————————————————————-
9
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
References Cited
PUBLICATIONS
ABSTRACT
DESCRIPTION
1. Technical Field
10
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
2. Background Art
11
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
12
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
13
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
14
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
If the particles which form the plasma along the earth’s field
lines continued to move with a constant pitch angle, often
designated “alpha”, they would soon impact on the earth’s
surface. Pitch angle alpha is defined as the angle between the
direction of the earth’s magnetic field and the velocity (V) of
the particle. However, in converging force fields, the pitch
angle does change in such a way as to allow the particle to turn
around and avoid impact. Consider a particle moving along a field
line down toward the earth. It moves into a region of increasing
magnetic field strength and therefore sine alpha increases. But
sine alpha can only increase to 1.0, at which point the particle
turns around and starts moving up along the field line, and alpha
decreases. The point at which the particle turns around is called
the mirror point, and there alpha equals ninety degrees. This
process is repeated at the other end of the field line where the
same magnetic field strength value B, namely Bm, exists. The
particle again turns around and this is called the “conjugate
point” of the original mirror point. The particle is therefore
trapped and bounces between the two magnetic mirrors. The
particle can continue oscillating in space in this manner for
long periods of time. The actual place where a particle will
mirror can be calculated from the following:
sin^2 alpha0=B0/Bm
wherein:
15
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
[…]
16
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
17
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
v=df
[…]
18
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
19
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
20
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
[…]
21
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
22
Jan
EASTLUND BARIUM REFERENCE
23
Jan
PLOT OF RAINFALL pH TEST DATA
pH Test Alert
ph Test Results
20 Times
Drastic pH Changes
]]>
24
Jan
ABSORPTION STUDY
ABSORPTION STUDY
Jan 9, 2001
ABSORPTION STUDY
January 09 2001
Clifford E Carnicom
The following table depicts an estimate of the amount of electromagnetic energy absorbed by a
particle of barium at various sizes and for varying wavelengths. The results for other metals
should be similiar to those of barium. The basis for this work is arrived at through a use of the
exponential attentuation law in combination with the definition of the coefficient of absorption.
The derived result expressing the energy absorption of a metallic particle is a function of particle
size, conductivity, wavelength and the permeability of the vacuum constant.
25
Feb
USAF TO TAYLOR: ALL IS 'ORDINARY'
Feb
USAF TO TAYLOR: ALL IS 'ORDINARY'
Feb 1, 2001
USAF TO TAYLOR:
ALL IS ‘ORDINARY’
The following letter has been received by postal mail and is made available for the public record.
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 01 2001
26
Feb
THE NUREMBERG CODE
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person
involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to
exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit,
duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient
knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to
make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the
acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known
to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is
to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects
upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.”
Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control
Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office,
1949.
27
Feb
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY LAW
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
LAW
Posted By Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 01 2001
The mission of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is to protect human health and to
safeguard the natural environment–air, water, and land–upon which life depends.
(A) The Administrator shall, from time to time, issue proposed emission standards applicable to the
emission of any air pollutant from any class or classes of aircraft engines which in his judgment causes,
or contributes to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.
(3) The Administrator shall hold public hearings with respect to such proposed standards. Such hearings
shall, to
the extent practicable, be held in air quality control regions which are most seriously affected by aircraft
emissions. Within 90 days after the issuance of such proposed regulations, he shall issue such
regulations with such modifications as he deems appropriate. Such regulations may be revised from time
to time.
(a) Endangerment of public health or welfare in foreign countries from pollution emitted in United States
Whenever the Administrator, upon receipt of reports, surveys or studies from any duly constituted
international agency has reason to believe that any air pollutant or pollutants emitted in the United States
cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare in a foreign country or whenever the Secretary of State requests him to do so with respect to
such pollution which the Secretary of State alleges is of such a nature, the Administrator shall give
formal notification thereof to the Governor of the State in which such emissions originate.
28
Feb
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY LAW
Each State plan shall contain measures which will be effective to notify the public during any calendar
[1] on a regular basis of instances or areas in which any national primary ambient air quality standard is
exceeded or was exceeded during any portion of the preceding calendar year to advise the public of the
health hazards associated with such pollution, and to enhance public awareness of the measures which
can be taken to prevent such standards from being exceeded and the ways in which the public can
participate in regulatory and other efforts to improve air quality. Such measures may include the posting
of warning signs on interstate highway access points to metropolitan areas or television, radio, or press
notices or information.
29
Feb
UNITED STATES EPA REGION 4 ALSO 'UNAWARE'
UNITED STATES
EPA REGION 4
ALSO ‘UNAWARE’
The following letter has been received by postal mail and is made available for the public record.
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 01 2001
30
Feb
UNITED STATES EPA REGION 4 ALSO 'UNAWARE'
31
Feb
UNITED STATES EPA REGION 4 ALSO 'UNAWARE'
32
Feb
UNITED NATIONS TREATY Environmental Modification Restrictions 1976
33
Feb
UNITED NATIONS TREATY Environmental Modification Restrictions 1976
34
Feb
IDENTICAL FIBER SAMPLES RECEIVED
IDENTICAL FIBER
SAMPLES RECEIVED
Posted by
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 04 2001
Two additional samples of fibrous material have been received within the last few months. These
samples are identical in both appearance and characteristic to those described earlier. Four
such samples have now been reviewed under the microscope. Material by all appearances
identical to that presented herein has been sent by certified mail to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency for identification. These earlier materials were found to contain significant
biological components as described within previously. To date, this agency refuses to identify
this material and to disclose the results of such testing to the American public. Carol Todd
Whitman, the recently appointed administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, is now
obligated to fulfill this duty to the citizens of this country.
35
Feb
IDENTICAL FIBER SAMPLES RECEIVED
Sample sent from Joseph, Oregon on Oct 02 2000. Magnification Approx. 480x.
36
Feb
IDENTICAL FIBER SAMPLES RECEIVED
Sample sent from Joseph, Oregon on Oct 02 2000. Magnification Approx. 480x.
37
Feb
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION
Feb 5, 2001
ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATION
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 05 2001
38
Feb
TELEPHONE TAP APPARENT
TELEPHONE TAP
INDICATED(FORMER TITLE)
APPARENT(CURRENT TITLE)
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 06 2001
Latest Edit April 08 2001
There are now indications that the telephone line to my residence may now be tapped, and that a
covert means to monitor conversation may have been established. These indications have
originated from abrupt and erratic telephone service on Feb 03, Feb 04 and Feb 05 2001 to my
residence, which included symptoms of repeated termination of conversation in mid-progress,
failed connections, emergence of dial tones midstream and various clicks and anomalous
sounds within the transmissions. These patterns were also reported by third parties, as well as
having been witnessed from my residence.
Since that time, the telephone has generally restored itself to an apparent norm, with the
exception that conversations are now discretely, repeatedly and intermittently interrupted with
periodic clicks and momentary pauses of silence within the telephone transmissions.
These facts are reported strictly from an observational point of view, in an effort to present an
honest record of those actions that may have been taken. If information to the contrary presents
itself, or if a change in these circumstances occur, I will promptly report that information with
equal earnestness.
Sincerely,
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 06 2001
39
Feb
TELEPHONE TAP APPARENT
40
Feb
IONIZATION-"CLOUDS" RELATIONSHIP
IONIZATION-"CLOUDS" RELATIONSHIP
Feb 24, 2001
IONIZATION-“CLOUDS”
RELATIONSHIP
The role and importance of photo-ionization within the aerosol operations is becoming
increasingly evident. In addition to the reasoning process outlined earlier within A Case For
Testing, the formation of so-called “clouds” can be directly related to the introduction of easily
ionized materials within the atmosphere.
From Chemistry, by Joseph Mascetta 1996, it is stated within the discussion on cloud chambers,
that:
“One of the most useful instruments for detecting and measuring radiation is the Wilson cloud
chamber. Its operation depends on the well known fact that moisture tends to concentrate
around ions (the probable explanation for some formation of clouds in the sky).“
Numerous other references related to cloud chamber theory complement the above statement,
and they also describe the clear relationship between the introduction of an ionizable material
and the condensation process.
This finding is in accord with all previous analyses which substantiate the case of radical
alterations in the earth’s atmosphere, as well as with the recent findings that demonstrate the
abundance of electrically charged particulate matter in direct association with the aerosol
operations.
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 24 2001
41
Feb
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION METHOD ESTABLISHED
ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATION
METHOD ESTABLISHED
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 25 2001
A method to conduct electrostatic precipitation of atmospheric samples has been developed and
constructed. The history of electrostatic precipitation as a filtering technique for particulate data
extends back to at least 1906, with the work of Frederick Cottrell and the development of
industrial electrostatic precipitators. The method developed for this current purpose consists of
the following components :
Analysis of the material collected is conducted via microscopy. The method developed has been
tested upon smoke transferred into a container, and has proven itself to work exceptionally well.
At the bottom of this page is a photograph of collection of the smoke particulate matter on a
cotton swab obtained from the inside of a glass container used for that test.
The general operation of the precipitator is as follows: Air flow enters the incoming vent of the
electric ventilation fan. This air is channeled approximately 3 feet linear distance through duct
hose to a 3 inch diameter clear plastic container. The bottom of the container is removed for air
flow purposes, and the duct hose is connected and sealed to the container via duct tape.
Microscope glass slides are inserted into the container and held in place with transparent tape.
The lid of this same plastic container on the opposing end (lee side) is removed, and this
opening is covered with porous filter material to both restrict and permit air flow through the
container. An electrode consisting of fine wire 2 to 3 inches long is then inserted through the
side of the collection container, and is held in place with modeling clay. A wire to conduct the
electricity runs from the top sphere of the Van de Graaf generator to the electrode inserted into
the plastic container. The electric fan and the Van de Graaf generator are then started, and
allowed to run for a period of time. Approximately 1 hour has been used for the initial
atmospheric sampling. Particulate matter from the atmosphere will then be deposited on the
42
Feb
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION METHOD ESTABLISHED
microscope glass surface through the process of electrostatic precipitation, and it can be
subsequently analyzed under the microscope.
43
Feb
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION METHOD ESTABLISHED
44
Feb
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION METHOD ESTABLISHED
Test case of smoke particulate matter. Smoke particles precipitated on the interior glass surface
within approximately 10 seconds when subjected to the electric field of approx. 200k volts. This
test was repeated 3 times upon which a layer of material coating the interior of the glass surface
was plainly visible.
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 25 2001
45
Feb
BIOLOGICAL OPERATIONS CONFIRMED
BIOLOGICAL OPERATIONS
CONFIRMED
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 25 2001
Edited Feb 28 2001, Edited Mar 15 2001, Edited Mar 21 2001
The process of electrostatic precipitation has been used to examine atmospheric samples in
Santa Fe NM for particulate matter. The method used to establish the results presented herein
are described on the page Electrostatic Precipitation Method Developed. During this
investigation, it has been revealed that the atmosphere does contain inordinate biological
components, which are by the the best visual analysis currently available, red blood cells. Red
blood cells, possibly of a dessicated nature due to their reduced size, appear to have been
identified in any and all of three separate atmospheric samples examined as a direct result of
electrostatic precipitation tests conducted. The double concavity characteristic of red blood cells
has been repeatedly identified in each sample that has been acquired. The normal size of human
red blood cells is 7 to 8 microns in size. The size estimate of the cells measured thus far appears
to range between 4 to 6 microns. Dessication of the cells remains a high consideration in the
explanation of the cell size (in light of previous research presented on Biological Components
Identified), as well as consideration that will be given to alternative species. Both individual cells
and well as numerous clusters of cells have been identified. The cells in essentially all cases are
surrounded by what appears to be binding organic materials. The amount of cells which occur on
a microscopic slide exposed within the electrostatic apparatus for approximately 1 hour number
in the scores. The work conducted must be under conditions of low relative humidity in order to
generate sufficient voltage. Visibility of the materials has been enhanced through the use of
iodine stain. The need for professional biological identification, medical and legal involvement,
and the devotion of equipment and resources at a national level on these findings is now critical.
Biological components as an aspect of the aerosol operations up to this time have been
considered as being of a limited nature, with their significance and relevance to overall agendas
remaining unknown. These findings drastically alter that interpretation, and biological operations
must now be considered as a major and dominant consideration within the aerosol operations.
The methods of electrostatic precipitation outlined are now available for all researchers,
professionals and activists across the nation to employ. The results being presented here can
now be tested, refuted or confirmed by all parties with sufficient motivation and resources. It is
noted that all three atmospheric samples have tested positive for the existence of these
biological components, conducted on Feb 24 and Feb 25 2001 in Santa Fe NM. The need to
conduct these tests and to perform the qualifying research is now paramount to the welfare of all
citizens.
Research related to these findings will continue, and additional information will be presented as
circumstances warrant. Air filtration and testing by more conventional methods involving HEPA
filters also remains in progress.
46
Feb
BIOLOGICAL OPERATIONS CONFIRMED
47
Feb
BIOLOGICAL OPERATIONS CONFIRMED
48
Feb
BIOLOGICAL OPERATIONS CONFIRMED
ADDITIONAL RESEARCH:
Species Size in
Microns
Dog 7.0
Pig 6.0
Horse 5.8
Cat 5.8
Cow 5.8
Sheep 4.5
Goat 3.2
Species Size in
Microns
Primate – Monkey ~7
Human ~7
The following reply was received from a professional when an inquiry was sent requesting the
size of primate blood cells:
“For all practical purposes i.e. lab equipment they are the
same size as human rbcs – 6-8 or approx. 7 microns in dia. – but in
reality some species may be bigger such as the baboon. One old ref that
may be helpful is: Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 1977, pp 379-383, Pergamon
press. This ref states rhesus rbcs are 6 microns in diameter. Perhaps
MCV would be a better value to evaluate and it is easily found in the
literature.”
49
Feb
BIOLOGICAL OPERATIONS CONFIRMED
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 02 2001
Purdue University
Veterinary Hematology Slide Review
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 25 2001
50
Feb
BIOLOGICAL OPERATIONS CONFIRMED
[Link]
51
Feb
NIPR ACTIVITY INCREASES
Visitation activity by [Link] has increased dramatically over past several days to
[Link]. As designated within the visitors list to this site, NIPR has been researched
to involve the following relationship to the United States Department of Defense:
The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) has established a number of NIPRNet gateways
to the Internet, which will be protected and controlled by firewalls and other technologies.
Any additional identifying information on this agency is appreciated, and may be posted publicly
on the message board attached to [Link].
Clifford E Carnicom
Feb 28 2001
The following has been received by email on March 01 2001. Appreciation is extended to the
sender for this additional information on NIPR:
I saw on your visitors list you wanted to know more information about NIPR? It is my opinion that
NIPR is going to be a common “domain name” and will increase in frequency of visits. In other
words being able to discriminate between various DoD websites will be harder to ascertain; as
many of the people surfing your sites will be routing through NIPRnet. Obsfucate? Looks like it.
The DISA created NIPR so that NIPR is essentially a VERY secure, single point of contact for all
DoD connections to the web. Imagine it as a super firewall for all of the DoD’s various branches,
partners, and
educational institutions that work with the DoD.
To understand what NIPR offers the DoD, read this slideshow on DISA:
[Link]
[Link]
The NIC is operated by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA). It provides information
and services that are mission critical to the operation of the worldwide IP router Defense
Information Systems Network and other DoD sponsored networks.
52
Feb
NIPR ACTIVITY INCREASES
The NIC:
Operates the .MIL generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) Registry
Operates the DoD Assigned Numbers Registry
Operates the DoD Internet Routing Registry
Provides Directory Service for Each Registry
Manages and Administers the MIL gTLD
Manages and Administers Sub-level Domain Name System (DNS) Domains
Coordinates Actions Regarding Security Incidents and Network
Vulnerabilities
And below is a link to info about what NIPRnet was envisioned to be…
[Link]
WASHINGTON, DC 20301-6000
SUBJECT: Increasing the Security Posture of the Unclassified but Sensitive Internet Protocol
Router Network (NIPRNet)
53
Feb
NIPR ACTIVITY INCREASES
54
Mar
HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
Mar
HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
Mar 6, 2001
HEPA BIOLOGICALS
CONFIRMED
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 06 2001
The filter unit that has been used is widely available and inexpensive, and when coupled with a
microscope affords the opportunity for all citizens to conduct serious research regarding the
aerosol operations that remain underway without citizen informed consent. A microscope of
approximately 400 power will be sufficient to identify the cellular and binding material. The
concavity of the cells will be slightly visible at that level, with variations in lighting and depth of
field showing a ring structure indicative of the concave surfaces. Two separate methods of
55
Mar
HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
filtering operating independently over time are now producing identical results. These methods
of filtering and identification are now available to all citizens with modest means. The
identification of the cell types found , and an accountability for their existence is of critical
importance to the public welfare, and it is hoped that independent researchers, professionals and
activists will contribute to that cause.
56
Mar
HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
57
Mar
HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
58
Mar
HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
59
Mar
FALSE STATEMENT ISSUED
FALSE STATEMENT
ISSUED
Mar 08 2001
Clifford E Carnicom
Any statements, implications, or insinuations made by any individuals, including a Mr. Patrick
Minnis, that I have received monetary compensation for personal gain for participation in any
video documentary projects are PATENTLY FALSE and are herein refuted. Monetary
compensation for personal gain is excluded as a factor in any research that I have conducted, am
conducting, or will continue to conduct on the aerosol operations that are occurring without
informed consent.”
Those that wish to research this issue may wish to contact the publisher of any video or
informational sources that are referred to. In addition, let it be known that I specifically did
request that a written statement of non-compensation be included within the recent documentary
that is most likely being referred to. I have not produced any videos to date, but I have
contributed information to various sources for the public welfare.
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 08 2001
The following is an excerpt from a recent relayed posting on the Jeff Rense internet site. The link
to this page is entitled “Nasa Scientist Quoted in USA Today Talks About Chemtrails”.
Dear xxx,
60
Mar
MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC (MHD) CONSIDERATIONS
MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC
(MHD) CONSIDERATIONS
Mar 12 2001
Clifford E Carnicom
Evidence continues to accumulate that the ionization level of the atmosphere has been modified in a
significant way as a result of the aircraft aerosol operations. A current topic of research is the topic of
magnetohydrodynamics, which is defined as follows:
“The study of the interactions between a conducting fluid and a magnetic field. MHD is important
in the study of controlled thermonuclear reactions in which the conducting fluid is a plasma
confined by a magnetic field. Other important applications include the magnetohydrodynamics
power generator. In the open-cycle MHD generator a fossil fuel, burnt in oxygen or preheated
compressed air, is seeded with an element of low ionization potential (such as potassium or
cesium). This element is thermally ionized at the combustion temperature (usually over 2500K)
producing sufficient free electrons (e.g. K -> K+ + e) to provide adequate electrical conductivity.
The interaction between the moving conducting fluid and the strong applied magnetic field
across it generates an electromagnetic field on the Faraday principle, except that the solid
conductor of the conventional generator is replaced by a fluid conductor.“
“The generation of electricity by motion of a conducting fluid through a magnetic field, i.e.,
magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), provides a method of electric power generation without moving
mechanical parts and when the conducting fluid is a plasma formed by combustion of a fuel such
as natural gas, an idealized combination of apparatus is realized since the very clean-burning
natural gas forms the conducting plasma in an efficient manner and the thus formed plasma,
when passed through a magnetic field, generates electricity in a very efficient manner. Thus the
use of a fuel source [42] to generate a plasma by combustion thereof for the generation of
electricity essentially at the site of occurrence of the fuel source is unique and ideal when high
power levels are required and desirable field lines intersect the earth’s surface at or near the site
of the fuel source. A particular advantage for MHD generators is that they can be made to
generate large amounts of power with a small volume, light weight device. For example, a 1000
megawatt MHD generator can be construed using superconducting magnets to weigh roughly
42,000 pounds and can be readily air lifted.“
“Plasma Power : A higher temperature plasma is the exhaust of a jet engine. It is a weakly ionized
plasma, but when small amounts of potassium or cesium metal are added, it becomes a very
good conductor, and when it is directed into a magnet, electricity is generated. This is MHD
power, the magnetohydrodynamic interaction between a plasma and a magnetic field.“
61
Mar
MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC (MHD) CONSIDERATIONS
“Weapons:
The use of MHD in weapons is endless, with an effective MHD defence system in place, it is
possible to use magnets, harnessing only the power of air, to create huge electric forces, using
(8-10) Tesla Coils for defence would be made possible, of course the field of High Temperature
Superconductivity (HTSC) would have to be conquered.“
62
Mar
USA TODAY -WILLIAM THOMAS RESPONSE -CORRECTION
USA TODAY
-WILLIAM THOMAS
RESPONSE
-CORRECTION
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 15 2001
An article published by USA Today on Mar 07 2001 follows at the bottom of this page.
A statement by William Thomas is posted by request. This statement does require a correction in
order to accurately characterize the results of my work, as is denoted below with an asterisk,
with the substitution of the word CLOUDS instead of the word contrails. I have, in the past,
presented studies involving contrail dissipation and cloud formation; studies in progress related
to contrail formation have not yet been published. This correction has been relayed to William
Thomas.
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 15 2001
“As a professional journalist for more than 30 years I am deeply angered and embarrassed by
this story which recently appeared in one of America’s most influential newspapers. After
speaking with Clifford Carnicom and other veteran chemtrail researchers, Traci Watson
interviewed me for more than an hour. My extensive documentation must have been too
convincing to include in a dismissive article that is 100% accurate concerning contrails – and
100% disinformation regarding the sky-filled reality of chemtrails.
Most telling of all, I suggested that Ms. Watson call Clifford Carnicom back and ask for his U.S.
government meteorological data showing that on days of intense aerial gridding over Sante Fe, New
Mexico the temperature and humidity at the altitudes aircraft were observed spreading thick plumes
made the formation of contrails* [CLOUDS] absolutely impossible.
In choosing to ignore the facts while pursuing a blatant editorial agenda, Ms. Watson has disgraced her
readers and her craft.“
Sincerely,
William Thomas
63
Mar
USA TODAY -WILLIAM THOMAS RESPONSE -CORRECTION
A new conspiracy theory sweeping the Internet and radio talk shows has set parts of the federal
government on edge. The theory: The white lines of condensed water vapor that jets leave in the sky,
called contrails, are actually a toxic substance the government deliberately sprays on an unsuspecting
populace.
Federal bureaucracies have gotten thousands of phone calls, e-mails and letters in recent years from
people demanding to know what is being sprayed and why. Some of the missives are threatening. It’s
impossible to tell how many supporters these ideas have attracted, but the people who believe them say
they’re tired of getting the brush-off from officials. And they’re tired of health problems they blame on
”spraying.”
”This is blatant. This is in your face,” says Philip Marie Sr., a retired nuclear quality engineer from
Bartlett, N.H., who says the sky above his quiet town is often crisscrossed with ”spray” trails. ”No one
will address it,’’ he says. ”Everyone stonewalls this thing.”
The situation Marie and others describe is straight out of The X-Files. He and others report one day
looking up at the sky and realizing that they were seeing abnormal contrails: contrails that lingered and
spread into wispy clouds, multiple contrails arranged in tick-tack-toe-like grids or parallel lines, contrails
being laid down by white planes without registration numbers.
Believers call these tracks ”chemtrails.” They say they don’t know why the chemicals are being
dropped, but that doesn’t stop them from speculating. Many guess that the federal government is trying
to slow global warming with compounds that reflect sunlight into the sky. Some propose more ominous
theories, such as a government campaign to weed out the old and sick. Exasperated by persistent
questions, the Environmental Protection Agency, NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration and the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration joined forces last fall to publish a fact sheet explaining
the science of contrail formation. A few months earlier, the Air Force had put out its own fact sheet,
which tries to refute its opponents’ arguments point by point.
”If you try to pin these people down and refute things, it’s, ‘Well, you’re just part of the conspiracy,’ ”
says atmospheric scientist Patrick Minnis of NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va. ”Logic
is not exactly a real selling point for most of them.” Nothing is ”out there” except water vapor and ice
crystals, say irritated scientists who study contrails. Some, such as Minnis, are outraged enough by the
claims of chemtrail believers that they have trolled Internet chat rooms to correct misinformation or have
gotten into arguments with callers.
”Conspiracy nonsense,” snorts Kenneth Sassen, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Utah.
”These things are at 30,000 to 40,000 feet in the atmosphere. They’re tiny particles. They’re not going
to affect anyone.”
The cloud-forming contrails that conspiracy theorists find so ominous are ”perfectly natural,” Minnis
says. The odd grid and parallel-line patterns are easily explained as contrails blown together by the wind,
scientists say.
———————————————————–
64
Mar
COLORADO HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
COLORADO HEPA
BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 16 2001
A second HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filter sample has now been analzyed under the
microscope. This filter was received from Aspen, Colorado, a high altitude region. This filter was
exposed to the outside atmosphere for a duration of five days at approximately 15 feet above
ground level. This HEPA filter also clearly shows the frequent presence of biological materials.
Again, the best visual analysis available at this time indicates that these cellular materials appear
to be erythrocytes (red blood cells). This is indicated by the uniformity, the color, the size and the
bi-concave nature of the cells. The sizes of the cells again measure at approximately 5 microns in
diameter. Encapsulating or binding materials again surround the majority of the cells that are
found. The results of this analysis are completely and exactly identical with the first HEPA filter
analysis and the electrostatic precipitation results from Santa Fe, New Mexico. This latest review
is now the 4th atmospheric sample that has been analyzed under the microscope, and the results
are identical for each. Two earlier airbone samples of fibrous samples, as have been received
the EPA without acknowledgement, also show the presence of similiar biological components.
These results again demonstrate the urgent need for independent, professional and verifiable biological
identification and medical analysis of the samples which are being disclosed.
65
Mar
COLORADO HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
The only sufficient resolution to the questions raised is that of testing and positive identification.
Discourse is insufficient.
The visibility of the binding or base material, and consequently the cells by the process of
contrast, appears to be significantly enhanced with the use of an iodine stain. A dessication, or
freeze-drying process remains a viable consideration because of the reduced size (note earlier
studies), as well as the consideration of alternative species. Any corrections to these findings
will be presented as they are appropriate.
It is urgent that the sampling process now be extended across the entire nation. Two locations
within the U.S. separated by approximately 250 miles straight line distance are showing identical
results. The methods and equipment for HEPA filtering are relatively inexpensive and accessible,
and are described on a previous page. It is requested that such samples be sent for professional,
independent and verifiable analysis, and the results disclosed to the public for review. Citizens
are free to contact me with sample filters if they have no other resources available to them.
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 16 2001
66
Mar
COLORADO HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
67
Mar
COLORADO HEPA BIOLOGICALS CONFIRMED
68
Mar
QUESTIONS : 2001
QUESTIONS : 2001
Mar 20, 2001
QUESTIONS : 2001
Mar 20 2001
The following statement has been received anonymously on Mar 20 2001 and is posted on behalf
of the sender:
** Is it possible, that the advent of and steady increase in subsonic and supersonic aviation have
likewise probably caused significant disruption of stratospheric and tropospheric chemistry and
circulation, including negative impact on the stratospheric ozone layer, and have also probably
caused significant disruption of sensitive seasonal processes at the tropospheric boundary
layer?
** Is it possible that breakdown products of nuclear waste are being disposed of via satellite into
the near-earth space environment?
** Is it possible that the jetstream has been/is being tampered with, directly or indirectly?
** Is it possible that if, in fact, profound disruption of earth’s systems, particularly atmospheric,
has occurred, this would be known to the parties involved and that some sort of cover-up might
then be in order, from their point of view? Is it possible that the much-publicized ongoing
“debate” over “global warming” may be just such a cover-up? Is it possible that the facts of very
real and progressive damage to all of our eco-systems from various forms of surface and
atmospheric pollution are being buried under the larger issue [sic] of a bogus “debate” re:
“global warming”? Is it possible that the parties most directly invested in this “debate” are
stalling for time in order that they might more advantageously position themselves for dealing
with the economic ramifications of taking responsibility for their minimally-controlled pollution of
this planet?
** Is it possible that the militarization of the near-earth space environment is going to have an
effect on conditions in earth’s atmosphere and possibly at the surface? Is it possible that the
“Missile Defense System” as it has been “presented” to the public for the last 15 years is not, in
fact, what is actually being developed for ultimate implementation? Is it possible that what is
actually intended for deployment is a modular, land- and space-based communications and
weapons system? Is it possible that this multi-faceted system involves, in no insignificant part,
the application of specific directed-energy concepts as originally developed by Nikola Tesla, and
kinetic energy concepts as well? Is it possible that specific atmospheric “modifications” may be
required to accommodate certain components [advanced radar and communications] of such a
system? Is it possible that certain components of this system are not only being tested, but are
69
Mar
QUESTIONS : 2001
** Re: the much-discussed “biological” aspect of this issue – Is it possible that DARPA [and the
US Army in particular], in conjunction with several academic institutions, private research
facilities and private industry, is overseeing an extensive R&D program involving development of
methods for detection of bio/chem agents in the global environment? Is it possible that this
program involves many sub-programs which are conducted in the atmosphere [aerosols] and on
the ground and in the water? Is it possible that “detection”, ideally and ultimately space-based,
of not only bio/chem agents, but global pollution, radiation leaks, etc. is a primary R&D focus
generally?
** that the now relatively continuous presence of these persistent trails and/or the resultant
persistent, bizarre cloud cover has definitely influenced weather patterns and even the climatic
reality of the areas over which these “conditions” are observed?
** that the reduction in unoccluded sunlight resulting from the above-referenced persistent cloud
cover is negatively affecting people’s general physical health and their mental and emotional
states?
** that a component of this persistent “trails dispersion” may be in conjunction with studies
involving refinement of advanced radar and communications concepts in preparation for
deployment of a land- and space-based weapons system?
** that there is especially continuous presence of cloud “cover” along the US borders,
particularly coastal?
** that atmospheric moisture is now routinely being steered around and either enhanced or
suppressed as “desired conditions” dictate, and that this may be the reason for drought in some
areas and flooding in others?
** that one possible “biological” effect of relatively continuous cloud “cover” would be the
eventual undermining of previously healthy immune systems due to significant reduction in the
amount of full-spectrum sunlight necessary to maintain same?
** that if it were specifically and exclusively a radical change in jet fuel composition, or simply an
increase in commercial air traffic, that are causing the graphic transformation of our skies, there
would be an open public announcement to this effect? Repeat: an open public announcement?
10 March 2001
Posted on behalf of the sender by C.E. Carnicom with permission of the author.
Mar 20 2001
70
Mar
CONTRAIL DISTANCE FORMATION MODEL
CONTRAIL DISTANCE
FORMATION MODEL
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 22 2001
Edited Dec 19 2014
Edited Jun 01 2016
A model has been developed to estimate the distance behind the engines that a contrail, i.e.,
condensed trail of water vapor, is expected to form. The results of this model agree exceptionally
well with a statement issued by the United States Air Force that “contrails become visible
roughly about a wingspan distance behind the aircraft”. There is now an abundance of
photographic and video evidence that consistently and visibly demonstrates the repeated
formation of aerosol trails in much closer proximity to the engines than that which is established
by the Air Force, as well as that which is predicted from the model described below. These trail
formations are in direct contradiction to a statement of fact issued by the United States Air Force.
This evaluation now adds to the multitude of studies which conclusively demonstrate that the
emissions from these aerosol operations are not composed primarily of water vapor. This model
is not intended to encompass all variables that may be in effect, but does represent a rational
attempt to model the physics of contrail formation times involved. Any corrections to this study
will be made as is appropriate. This model is in addition to that previously developed related to
expected contrail dissipation times, as well as originating relative humidity studies at flight
altitude.
Let us assume that the temperature of the exhaust emissions of the aircraft is approximately
1000 deg. C., which is an apparent reasonable estimate (see Principles of Jet Engine Operation).
The model can easily be generalized to encompass any reasonable ranges in temperature that
are expected within the combustion process and subsequent exhaust emissions. The model is
not highly sensitive to expected changes in temperature at this level, and if a more accurate
value becomes available, it will be used in the future.
Let us assume the temperature of the atmosphere at flight altitude, approximately 35,000 ft. MSL is -50
deg. C. Again, each variable within the model can be generalized as needed, and the sensitivity of the
model to these changes can be evaluated.
The amount of heat extraction required to cool the exhaust vapor can be given as follows:
for the sake of initial example and simplicity, and to demonstrate numerical results, let us apply this to 1
gram of water:
71
Mar
CONTRAIL DISTANCE FORMATION MODEL
or
H = -(25 + 80 + 100 + 540 + 300) cal. = -1045 cal. required to cool steam at 1000 deg. C. to 1 gm of ice
at -50 deg. C.
Now,
Therefore,
Next, to consider a realistic particle size for emissions from aircraft, the Max Planck Institute has stated
that the average size of particles emitted from aircraft is approximately 30 to 200 microns in size. As a
side note, the average particle size of cloud nuclei is stated by Vincent Schaefer, Atmosphere, to be from
0.2 to 0.3 microns. Let us assume an average size of 115 microns on each side of a cube particle.
Since 1 gm. of water = 1 cu. cm in volume, a cube particle size of 115 microns in dimension on each side
has a volume of:
Since 1 gm. of water has a volume of (1E-2)^3 meters, the volume of a gram of water is (1E-6) cu. m.
The ratio in volume of a particle of dimension 115 microns to a gram of water is:
or
(1.52E-6)
The amount of heat required to cool the 115 micron particle is therefore
(1.52E-6) (4375 J) = 6.654E-3 J. for a particle 115 microns thick and corresponding to a temperature
change of 1050 deg. C. [note units are therefore: J / (m * K)]
Now evaluate the thermal conductivity of the medium in which the particle exists, i.e., air. From the REA
Handbook of Mathematical, Scientific, and Engineering Formulas, Tables, Functions, Graphs, and
Transforms, the thermal conductivity of air at – 50deg. C. is given as .012 Btu / (hr * ft * deg. F).
72
Mar
CONTRAIL DISTANCE FORMATION MODEL
.012 Btu / (hr * ft * deg F.) -> (1055 J / Btu) / ((3600sec/hr) * (.3048m/ft.) * ((5/9)deg. K / deg. F))
.02075 J / (s * m * K)
Therefore the amount of time required to cool the particle from 1000 deg. C to -50 deg. C is given by:
Now for an aircraft traveling at 500 mph, this translates to approx. 733 ft./sec.
Therefore, the particle evaluated will cool to the ambient temperature in approximately:
(733 ft./sec) * .321 sec = 235 feet behind the engines of the aircraft.
A Boeing 757 measures approximately 155 ft. in length. The distance from the rear of the engines to the
tail of the aircraft is approximately 80 feet (scaled). Therefore the contrail is expected to form
approximately (235 ft. – 80 ft.), or approximately 155 ft. behind the tail of the aircraft. The wingspan of a
Boeing 757, being used as a representative example, is approximately 125 feet in width. The results of
this model agree quite well (approx. 30 ft. coupled with the transition zone) therefore, with the expected
physics and chemistry of water vapor as well as with the statement provided by the United States Air
Force. The model will show itself to be sensitive to particle size. “Contrail” formation in front of, or
immediately adjacent to the stabilizer region of the aircraft, is not to be expected either from the results
of this model, or from that statement issued by the Air Force.
Significant deviations from these results as well as from the USAF statement, as they occur
repeatedly in conjunction with the aerosol operations, are tangible evidence of non-water vapor
emissions that are involved.
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 22 2001
Correspondence regarding this paper of 2001 has been received by me directly for the first time during
the current week. I will review this paper that was written more than a decade ago as time and
circumstances permit; I estimate that this will take place within the next month of two from this postscript.
I am currently involved with active projects that require my attention and efforts. In the interim, and in the
spirit of open disclosure and fair consideration, the correspondence received is linked immediately
below.
On the first pass to attempt to access the information referred to, the following error is encountered on
both sources (as is forewarned in the correspondence). This information will be required to evaluate the
matter further.
73
Mar
CONTRAIL DISTANCE FORMATION MODEL
It appears that the information will originate from the following source:
Clifford E Carncom
Dec 19 2014
The link referenced in the correspondence is operational as of this date, and I have reviewed the
material. The issue here appears to be a classic case of using the logic fallacy of “the exception proves
the rule”. If the material is reviewed with respect to its entirety and context, it will be seen that the model
and statements referred to within the correspondence are in direct agreement with the model presented
in this paper. As provided:
74
Mar
CONTRAIL DISTANCE FORMATION MODEL
If the section is read in its entirety, the following points are clear.
1. The standard atmosphere is chosen as the reference. This is fitting and proper as it is the most
comprehensive model of atmospheric conditions that exists for physical reference on the state of
the atmosphere.
1. The “threshold temperature” is the critical temperature of formation for the contrail , and it is a
primary focus for creation of the model to begin with.
1. Under standard atmospheric conditions and under the threshold conditions, i.e., exactly the
conditions of research for all models (Carnicom , Schmidt-Applebaum and the [Link] Force) the
conclusion is exactly the same. Approximately one wingspan behind the aircraft is the norm of
formation for the contrail under standard atmospheric conditions.
1. The model then provides the exception that under “lower” temperatures (i.e., NOT standard), the
distance of formation “can” be less. This is the exception to the norm, and it is always
reasonable in model formation to allow for exceptions. The temperature magnitudes for the
exception case are not defined, as it is fair to assume that they are anomalous and outside the
range of normal modeling. Exceptions are not the norm, and cannot be claimed to account for
the norm. This fallacy of logic denies the value, purpose and objective of the modeling process
itself.
75
Mar
CONTRAIL DISTANCE FORMATION MODEL
Clifford E Carnicom
Jun 01, 2016
76
Mar
MAR 26 2001 HEPA: CELLS NOT FOUND
A third HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filter sample has now been analzyed under the
microscope. This filter was exposed to the outside atmosphere for a duration of 10 days at approximately
10 feet above ground level in Santa Fe, New Mexico. This filter was placed into service on Mar 16 2001
and has been taken out of service on Mar 26 2001.
There is a noticeable lack of biological cells that satisfy the visual characteristics of red blood cells, or
erythrocytes, within this sample. The results of this analysis are in distinct contrast to the studies of Feb
25 and Mar 16 2001 that have been presented earlier. The results of this sample analysis are identical
with a result obtained by the method of electrostatic precipitation on Mar 21 2001. Incidentally, the
presence of juniper pollen, distinctive in appearance and measuring approximately 25-30 microns in
diameter (vs. bi-concave approx. 5 microns), is frequent and is now easily observed.
There remains abundant particulate and potential organic matter which requires further identification in
all samples that have been acquired. The current investigation is focused simply on the unexpected and
repeated identification of bi-concave circular cells of approximately 5 microns in diameter, that satisfy all
visual characteristics of erythrocytes, or red blood cells. All calls for professional assistance to conduct
further exact identification and the repetition of methods and testing measures have thus far gone
unheeded.
Within the current sample of Mar 26 2001, the matrix, base or encapsulating material that was
repeatedly identified in the analyses of Feb 25 2001 and Mar 16 2001 may remain present. Further
examinations will be required to resolve this question. There does appear to be the continued presence
of organic material with a sub-structure at the micron level or smaller, which is beyond the limit of the
available equipment to examine adequately. This material under examination, the boundaries of which
are irregular and variable in size, is also very receptive to an iodine stain.
These results demonstrate the need for continuous monitoring of the atmosphere at the microscopic
level to ascertain the presence of (or subsequent lack of) certain biological cell components as have
recently been identified throughout a 4 week period from two high elevation locations separated by
approximately 250 miles distance. HEPA filters and equipment are widely available at reasonable cost to
all citizens to extend the current testing procedures.
The examination of additional HEPA filters on a continuous basis from numerous monitoring locations
across the country will be beneficial. Those without any alternative resources for examination are
welcome to contact me directly for assistance. The need for professional independent medical, biological
and chemical analysis of any HEPA atmospheric filter samples obtained remains constant.
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 26 2001
77
Mar
VISIBILITY STANDARDS CHANGED
VISIBILITY STANDARDS
CHANGED
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 30 2001
Edited Apr 01 2001
The following graphs obtained from the National Climatic Data Center, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, demonstrate a significant alteration in visibility reporting methods
as well as data results that warrant a further explanation to the American public.
It will be noted that in October of 1997 a change in the reporting system of visibility data was
reduced from a former maximum of 40 miles to a limit of 10 miles. It is a reasonable question to
ask as to why that change was made, and whether or not it was made in anticipation of certain
events to follow that involve large scale aircraft aerosol operations over large scale geographic
regions.
One explanation which has been offered through recent correspondence for the switch to 10 mile
visibility limits involves the use of the ASOS, or the Automated Surface Observing System by the
National Weather Service, which incorporates a maximum visibility limit of 10 miles. Information
on this system can be viewed at the following link:
[Link] Any reason for the actual change in standard
remains unidentified at this point. Remaining in need of further accounting is the significant
degradation in visibility as evidenced by the data which follows this change in standard.
It is observed that there are highly significant degradations in the visibility data immediately
following this change in the reporting method. Immediately after this change, the dramatic
increase in visibility reports of less than 10 miles is quite apparent.
The graphs shown are taken from climatic archive data available for Santa Fe, NM from Jan 1994
to Mar 2001. Three different time periods are shown to aid in demonstrating the magnitude of
change which has occurred in visibility. The first graph shows all data available inclusive from
Jan 1994 to Mar 2001. The second graph shows the transition zone during which the visibility
standards were altered. This graph showns a period from Jan 1996 to Dec 1998; the change in
reporting standard was made in Oct 1997. The third graph shows recent data, where visibility
below 10 miles is now a regular occurrence. This graph shows the period from Jan 1999 to Mar
2001.
It will be valuable for other citizens to conduct similar archive research in varying geographic
regions. This data is available on the NCDC site at [Link]
78
Mar
VISIBILITY STANDARDS CHANGED
79
Mar
VISIBILITY STANDARDS CHANGED
80
Mar
VISIBILITY STANDARDS CHANGED
Note: Data points above the maximum reporting standard apparently indicate missing
observations.
Clifford E Carnicom
Mar 30 2001
Edited Apr 01 2001
81
Apr
pH DATA CONFLICT
Apr
pH DATA CONFLICT
Apr 1, 2001
pH DATA CONFLICT
Clifford E Carnicom
Apr 01 2001
A source of information has recently been submitted to me which, upon cursory review,
demonstrates a conflict in the pH data results being obtained by citizens across the country with
the United States goverment sources of this same data. More complete information on this report
as well as the source material from the United States Geological Survey will be presented in the
near future.
If such a conflict is identified to exist, the situation will further intensify the need and demand for
independent professional conduct and verification of pH rainfall test results across the nation.
To begin the process of comparison, the USGS source being provided is:
[Link]
This data may be contrasted with that being provided by citizens on an ongoing basis at:
[Link]
82
Apr
[Link] 10 1/2 HOUR VISIT
Let it be known that on Mar 31 2001 at 08:54 MST [Link], the United States Department of
Defense Network Operations, completed a visit to this website, [Link]. The duration
of this uninterrupted visit was approximately 10 1/2 hours and it involved an inspection or review
of 53 web pages within this same internet site.
As designated within the visitors list to this site, NIPR has been researched to involve the
following relationship to the United States Department of Defense:
The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) has established a number of NIPRNet gateways
to the Internet, which will be protected and controlled by firewalls and other technologies.
The following information was also provided on Mar 01 2001 by a citizen to further describe the
role and function of NIPR:
The DISA created NIPR so that NIPR is essentially a VERY secure, single point of contact for all
DoD connections to the web. Imagine it as a super firewall for all of the DoD’s various branches,
partners, and
educational institutions that work with the DoD.
Readers may also wish to refer to an earlier page which describes increased NIPR activity on this
website.
83
Apr
PARTICULATES REAFFIRMED
PARTICULATES REAFFIRMED
Apr 6, 2001
APR 07 :
PARTICULATES REAFFIRMED
Clifford E Carnicom
April 06 2001
The presence of abundant particulate matter in the atmosphere has again been confirmed by
video documentation. These events have, in fact, been repeatedly duplicated since they were first
recorded on video and presented on Jan 04 2001. A minimum of six sessions of video have been
conducted for this purpose since that date, and each shows the presence of abundant and by all
appearances, ionized particulate matter. See previous documentation on this subject. Note also
that significant numbers of biological materials were subsequently identified under the
microscope within atmospheric samples obtained the following day, April 08 2001.
84
Apr
PARTICULATES REAFFIRMED
85
Apr
PARTICULATES REAFFIRMED
86
Apr
CAUTIONS AGAINST PREMATURE CONCLUSIONS
CAUTIONS AGAINST
PREMATURE CONCLUSIONS
Clifford E Carnicom
April 06 2001
It is advised that all researchers, journalists and citizens be cautious against drawing any
premature conclusions regarding the specific purposes or agendas of aircraft aerosol operations
currently in progress throughout the United States and global regions. It is imperative that any
analysis be consistent with all available and observed data, and that no single agenda be
declared as an end purpose prior to comprehensive examination. Any efforts to identify specific
elements or compounds involved within the operations must satisfy a wide range of criteria and
conditions that have been established from the research efforts of numerous individuals.
Some of these criteria and conditions which are expected to be satisfied include the following:
1. Aerosol material size is extremely small, expected to be in the size range from sub-micron to
several microns in size. See previous study.
2. Materials are expected to be hygroscopic, i.e., water loving (e.g., some metallic salt forms), in
nature. See previous study.
3. Materials are expected to be ionizable by visible light or near ultra-violet wavelenths. See
previous study.
4. Materials are expected to possess a fairly high degree of solubility. See previous study.
5. Materials are expected to be alkaline in nature. See previous study.
6. Particulate aerosol materials are visible under specific lighting conditions. See previous report
.
7. Particulate aerosol materials exhibit electrically charged (ionized) motion. See previous report.
8. Electromagnetic energy absorption characteristics of candidate particulate matter must be
reviewed as a function of particle size, element type, and wavelength. Expected behavior across
the electromagnetic spectrum must be analytically evaluated, including but not limited to radio
waves, microwave (e.g., radar), visible, and x-rays wavelengths. Characteristics of absorption of
electromagnetic energy within the microwave portion (e.g., radar) of the spectrum may be of
particular interest. See previous study.
9. Visible particulate matter must be chemically identified. See previous report.
10. Spectrometry data indicating the presence of unexpected elements must be considered. See
previous study.
11. Relative humidity studies and particulate water absorption characteristics must be
considered. See previous study.
12. pH rainfall data results, indicating a significant increase in soluble hydroxides must be
incorporated with any analysis. See previous study.
13. Electrolysis examination of rainfall samples must be conducted and provide results that are
consistent with an observed increase in alkalinity (increased ionic distribution). See previous
report.
14. Fibrous materials, sub-micron in width, repeatedly documented and associated with aircraft
aerosol operations must be thoroughly analyzed. The failure of the United States Environmental
Agency to acknowledge the certified receipt of said material for testing and identification must be
included within that investigation. Biological components later found to exist within those same
samples must be professionally evaluated. See previous report.
87
Apr
CAUTIONS AGAINST PREMATURE CONCLUSIONS
15. The repeated identification of biological components within numerous atmospheric samples
that span both time and geographic separation must be accounted for. Professional examination
is a requirement. See previous report.
16. A comprehensive consideration of both electromagnetic and biological aspects with respect
to the accumulated observations and data must take place. See previous report.
17. Analytical models that have been developed describing conventional vapor trail formation,
distance span and dissipation must be compared to repeated conflicts within observations. See
previous studies 1,2,3.
18. Health effects that are being reported are to be considered in their totality in conjunction with
their probable causes and sources.
19. The repeated failure of civil, military, and media officials to adequately address the legitimate
citizen concerns and calls for formal investigation of widespread and well documented aerosol
activities must be accounted for. See previous record.
Each of the above criteria or conditions must be considered prior to any declaration of purpose
or agenda that is presumed to fully explain the aircraft aerosol operations in progress. No
chemical elements or compounds are beyond examination within the current investigation, and
none have been entirely excluded at this time; special attention is being given to certain
elements of Groups I and II of the periodic table because they satisfy many of the considerations
listed above. More than one type or mode of operation is to be considered as a likelihood. All
researchers, journalists, and citizens are urged to explore each of the above issues in detail to
reach a comprehensive assessment of the operations underway. In order to serve the broader
long term mutual goals of full disclosure and accountability of the events being witnessed,
premature statements of composition and purpose will need to be avoided. I will continue to
submit an appeal for broad-based participation and investigation by professionals, researchers,
journalists, public officials and citizens to address and resolve the urgent and serious claims
now before us.
Clifford E Carnicom
April 06 2001
88
Apr
BIOLOGICAL STAINS : READILY AVAILABLE
BIOLOGICAL STAINS :
READILY AVAILABLE
Clifford E Carnicom
April 07 2001
Investigation continues into the unexpected and repeated presence of biological components
within numerous atmospheric samples recently collected through the use of HEPA filters and the
process of electrostatic precipitation. A portion of this research involves the detection of
biological components with the use of varying stains. For those that attempt to discredit the use
of iodine stain as a viable stain method in the detection of such components, the following
information from the Museum of Science ([Link] may be of
value to all readers and researchers:
“Many samples, particularly cells, can appear quite transparent under the microscope. The
internal parts of the cells, the organelles, are so transparent that they are often difficult to see.
Biologists have developed a number of stains that help them see the cells and their organelles by
adding color to their transparent parts.
While many biological stains are for advanced study only, there are some that are easy to obtain and
use. Some readily available stains are: food coloring, iodine, malachite green (ick fish cure), and
methylene blue. Food coloring can be found at a grocery store, and iodine can be found at a pharmacy.
The last two stains, malachite green and methylene blue, can be purchased at aquarium shops.“
Investigation with all stains mentioned remains in progress. The use of methylene blue is also
showing the presence of significant amounts of biological materials within the atmospheric
samples under evaluation. Two additional biological stains that should be fairly easy to obtain
are eosin and safranine; eosine is one stain that is apparently valuable in blood testing methods.
It is recommended that other citizens and researchers combine their efforts and assist with this
investgation. The public appeal for independent professional involvement remains in standing.
Clifford E Carnicom
April 07 2001
89
Apr
APR 08 2001 : BIOLOGICALS REAFFIRMED
APR 08 2001 :
BIOLOGICALS REAFFIRMED
Clifford E Carnicom
Apr 08 2001
90
Apr
APR 08 2001 : BIOLOGICALS REAFFIRMED
were not identified during this most recent analysis. Filming of ionized particulate matter in the
atmosphere has again taken place as adjunct evidence to these events.
An public appeal remains open for the professional independent evaluation of these materials
which are consistently and repeatedly being identified within atmospheric samples bridging both
time and geographic region. The methods of collection have been freely described, require
limited resources and they are accessible to the general public. There exists an ethical and a
moral responsibility to the general public for positive identification and testing of the materials
which are being found and shown for review. Discourse and speculation are insufficient; positive
identification is a requirement.
91
Apr
APR 08 2001 : BIOLOGICALS REAFFIRMED
Clifford E Carnicom
Apr 08 2001
92
Apr
CONTRAIL FORMATION MODEL
CONTRAIL
FORMATION MODEL
Clifford E Carnicom
Apr 12 2001
A preliminary model has now been developed which can be used to predict whether contrails will
form or not under reported meteorological conditions at flight altitude. Analytical models for
contrail prediction appear to be difficult to acquire publicly, and this model is therefore offered
for investigative purposes. This is an original development that results from a variety of sources
and methods, including unclassified aerographic manuals, meteorological theory, least squares
analysis and regression analysis. It is to be interpreted as an empirical model, and it is subject to
further refinement depending on the results that are obtained from its use.
c + (.02c – .41)t
RHmin = _______________
(.003c – .14)
RHmin is the minimum relative humidity (with respect to water per conventional standard) that is
required at flight altitude for contrails to form. The contrails referred to are those classically and
conventionally defined as condensation trails, i.e., composed of water vapor. A standard
atmospheric model is assumed within the development. The model is intended to be used only
within the range of 30,000 to 40,000 ft. MSL. The model is quite sensitive to small changes in
temperature, and consequently, any errors in temperature.
Commercial flight traffic usually ranges between 35 and 37 thousand feet MSL. A representative
case may be considered, therefore, at approximately 36,000 ft. MSL. Standard temperature at
36,000 ft. MSL is approximately -53.5 deg. centigrade.
This model can and will now be evaluated with actual observations in an effort to test it for
reliability. Citizens are welcome to submit their own observations for inclusion if they so desire.
The value of this model is to identify those meterological conditions which are supportive of
conventional contrail formation. Anomalous persistent contrails and subsequent “cloud” decks
that result from frequent aerosol operations can also be examined in conjunction with this
model.
Contrail formation/dissipation and cloud formation are to be recognized as two separate physical
processes resulting from differing conditions and variables for each. It is important that any
93
Apr
CONTRAIL FORMATION MODEL
analysis of these two processes be appropriately and separately understood before any mutual
connection is to be made.
This model is in addition to that previously developed that predicts contrail dissipation times, as
well as a model to predict the distance behind the engines that the contrail is expected to form.
The model presented will be modified, revised or further developed as circumstances require.
94
Apr
IDENTIFICATION REQUESTED
IDENTIFICATION REQUESTED
Apr 19, 2001
IDENTIFICATION REQUESTED
Clifford E Carnicom
Apr 19 2001
Additional biological components have been repeatedly identified within atmospheric samples
collected through the process of electrostatic precipitation on April 18 and 19 2001. The
precipitator was active approximately one hour in each case. Microscope slides subjected to
precipitation were subsequently heat fixed. Methylene blue stain was applied for several minutes,
the slide gently rinsed, and then examined under the microscope. The view at the bottom of this
set of photographs represents a typical example of the frequently appearing matrix material of
irregular shape at approximately 500x. Close examination of this matrix material reveals the
frequent presence of clustered or chained groups of cells. The individual cells in this case are
measuring at approximately 3- 3.5 microns. As a comparison, a human hair ranges from
approximately 60 to 100 microns in thickness. Assistance with positive identification of this
material and the replication of sampling methods remains as an open request. Cocci bacteria,
including both streptococci (spherical and chainlike), staphylococci (spherical and clustered)
and fungal spores are being considered within the identification process, although the question
of size remains an issue. Apparently cocci bacteria commonly range between 0.5 and 5 microns,
however, an average size is reported at approximately 0.5 – 1 micron. If this information is
accurate, these samples would be at the higher end of the expected range if they are indeed
cocci bacterial forms. Any assistance on this matter is appreciated. The matrix materials remain
95
Apr
IDENTIFICATION REQUESTED
equally important to identify. The frequency, abundance and repetition of the materials observed
within any single sample set appears to be highly unusual. The materials readily accept
methylene blue stain after heat fixing. The materials shown here do not appear to be visible using
the simple iodine stain procedure that has been applied earlier under separate tests. Size,
spacial groupings and stain receptiveness indicate that the current materials are distinct and
separate. Biological materials that satisfy the visual properties of erythrocytes were not apparent
within this sampling. Additional identification methods will continue concomitant with the
request for identification assistance.
Numerous small bodies, approximately 1-2 microns in diameter, stain dark blue within the matrix
material. The matrix material itself appears to be at the sub-micron level or beneath the resolving
power of the microscope being used.
The purpose of this presentation is to request assistance with the identification of the materials
that are being shown. Information regarding the norms for bacterial type and amount within
atmospheric samples is also of benefit. Professionals in microbiology are invited to participate in
the process of identification to adequately address the questions and concerns that have
resulted from the observations, testing and research that remain in progress.
96
Apr
IDENTIFICATION REQUESTED
Note 3 biological chain structures; top left, middle and right edge of microphotograph.
Matrix material surrounds cellular structures. Approx. 2000x
97
Apr
IDENTIFICATION REQUESTED
98
Apr
SEARAD - MODTRAN - ABLEX
Researchers may wish to begin investigating the papers presented on the following website
representing the International Society for Optical Engineering located at:
[Link]
This site has been referred to me by an independent researcher with the following comment, held
as anonymous:
“Please take time to look into SEARAD, MODTRAN, and ABLEX. I believe if you research these
on [Link] you will will find compelling info for chemtrails…Much mention of clouds in
coordination with their new Air Borne Laser System… Thats all I can say as I am sure I too am
watched for my activity in trying to get to the truth.”
Initial research within this site under the keywords mentioned demonstrates significant
resources and efforts devoted toward aerosol modeling techniques, including the detection of
particulates and biological components. Some papers of interest include:
Other researchers may wish to begin collecting and assessing the impact of the research
programs that are well established and in place. The message board attached to this web site can
be used for further dissemination of the information that is acquired. Researchers that are
already familiar with these programs may wish to combine their efforts at that location.
My appreciation is extended to the individual for making this reference available for further
investigation and evaluation.
Clifford E Carnicom
April 20 2001
99
Powered by TCPDF ([Link])