0% found this document useful (0 votes)
283 views14 pages

Conductors

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
283 views14 pages

Conductors

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof.

Steven Errede

LECTURE NOTES 5
Materials made up of normal matter (atoms, molecules, etc.) have some amazing
electromagnetic properties!

Simplest kinds of electromagnetic properties:


A.) conductor (of electricity) ⎫ Why materials conduct vs. do not conduct electricity

B.) partial conductor/insulator ⎬ depends on microscopic (i.e. quantum) structure of
C.) non-conductor ⇒ insulator ⎭⎪ materials & temperature (i.e. thermal/internal energy).

CONDUCTORS:

"normal" good conductors of electricity: ⎞ Have finite DC resistance, R = V/I (Ohm’s Law)

metals - gold, platinum, silver, copper... ⎠ @ finite temperatures, T > 0 K.

"superconductors" - low temperature SC's such ⎞


⎟ DC resistance vanishes below Tc (critical temp)
as lead (Tc ~4K) indium, niobium, ..... ⎟
Hi-Tc SC's (e.g. Tc ~77K): BSCO, YBCO ..... ⎟⎠

INSULATORS:
e.g. plastics, teflon, glass, rubber ….

PARTIAL CONDUCTORS:
e.g. doped plastics, semi-conductors (germanium, silicon, graphite….)

IONIC LIQUIDS:
e.g. salt water – can also conduct electricity
Acidic solutions – ions transport electrical charges – not electrons

An ideal/perfect conductor is a (hypothetical) material that would have an unlimited number of


completely free electrons/free charges. No such things truly exist in nature, but ∃ many
materials which do come (amazingly) close to an ideal/perfect conductor.

©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 1


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

One important property of a conductor is that:


n.b. ENET ( r ) ≡ 0 is a different physics statement
1) ENET ( r ) ≡ 0 inside a conductor than E ( r ) ≡ 0 inside a conductor!

If ENET ( r ) = 0 inside a conductor, then free charges inside the conductor would move/be
accelerated by this Einside ( r ) = 0 , because: Finside ( r ) = qe Einside ( r ) = me ae ( r ) .

Indeed, this is precisely what happens inside a conductor e.g. when it is placed in a uniform
external electric field Eext ( r ) = E0 xˆ – the free charges inside the conductor (electrically neutral!)
re-distribute themselves to create/produce Einside ( r ) = 0 on extremely short timescales of ~ femto
→ pico-seconds ( ~ 10−15 − 10−12 sec ) .

The redistributed free charges pile up on the surface(s) of the conductor in such a way as to
produce Einside ( r ) = 0 . These induced charges produce an internal electric field of their own,
which exactly cancels the external field, Eext ( r ) !

e.g. consider a block of metal in a uniform external electric field, Eext ( r ) = E0 xˆ

Enet ( r ) = Eext ( r ) + Einduced ( r ) = 0


inside inside

⇒ Einduced ( r ) = − Eext ( r ) = − E0 xˆ
inside

Note that: Enet ( r ) = Eext ( r ) when a conductor is placed inside an initially uniform applied
outside

field, Eext ( r )

Induced surface charge, σ  Induced surface charge, σ ⊕


⎧  ← ⊕ ⎫
⎪  ← ⊕ ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪  ← ⊕ ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪  ← ⊕ ⎪
⎪  ← ⊕ ⎪
⎪ ⎪
Eext ( r ) = E0 xˆ ⎨  E (r ) ⊕ ⎬ Eext ( r ) = E0 xˆ
⎪  inside ⊕ ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪  ← ⊕ ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪  ← ⊕ ⎪
⎪  ← ⊕ ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎩  ← ⊕ ⎭
E0 xˆ x̂

2 ©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

Another important property of a conductor is that:

2) The volume free charge density, ρinside


free
( r ) = 0 inside a conductor.

This follows from Gauss’ Law (differential form):


∇ ⋅ Einside ( r ) = ρinside
free
(r ) εo
but if: Einside ( r ) = Eext ( r ) + Einduced ( r ) = 0, ∀r (i.e. everywhere inside conductor)
inside

then: ∇ ⋅ Einside ( r ) = 0, ∀rinside

⇒ ρinside
free
( r ) = 0, ∀rinside
3) Any induced charges on a conductor can ONLY reside on surface(s) of the conductor
– as surface charge distributions, σ free

(n.b. free surface charges minimize overall potential energy (i.e. maximize overall entropy of
system!))

If ∃ induced free charges, and ρinside


free
( r ) = 0 ∀r , the only place(s) such induced free charges can
reside is on the surface(s) of the conductor, as σ free ( r ) .

4) The entire volume & surface of a conductor is an equipotential.

If a & b are two arbitrary points, ra & rb on the surface of a conductor, the
must!!
potential difference, ΔVab ≡ Vb − Va = V ( rb ) − V ( ra ) = − ∫ E ( r )idl = 0 ⇒ Va = Vb
b

If ΔVab ≠ 0 then free charges will move!!

©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 3


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

5) Just outside the surface of a conductor, Eoutside ( r @ surface ) is


perpendicular/normal to the surface, i.e. Eoutside ( r @ surface ) nˆsurface

If ∃ an E ( r ) = Etangential ( r ) @ surface, ⇒ free charge will move/flow!!!


This can’t happen in electrostatics!!

⎛ Coulombs ⎞
Example: A conducting surface of total surface area, Acond is charged with σ free = σ o ⎜ ⎟.
⎝ m2 ⎠
What is the electric field strength (i.e. electric field intensity) at the surface of the conductor,
Esurface ?

⇒ Use (the integral form of) Gauss’ Law – choose fully enclosing Gaussian surface S to be
infinitesimally above the conducting surface (e.g. δ h larger than conducting surface everywhere).
Then take limit as δ h → 0 :
Q σ free Acond
∫ E idA = encl = Esurface ( r ) nˆ everywhere.
S ε0 ε0

= Esurface Acond
σ free σ o
∴ Esurface = Esurface = = (Volts m )
εo εo

n.b. If we had instead used e.g. a “shrunken” Gaussian pillbox on surface of conductor:
Q
∫ E idA = ∫ Esurface idA1 + ∫ E tangential idA2 + ∫ Einside idA3 = encl
=0 =0 =0
S S1 S2 S3 εo
Qencl σ oπ R 2 σ free σ
π R 2 Esurface = = ⇒ Esurface = nˆ = o nˆ
ε0 εo εo εo

Get same answer! (We should!)

4 ©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

The Free Surface Charge σ free


The Surface Electric field, E surface ( r )
The Surface Potential, V ( r ) ,
Electrostatic Force & Pressure
(Force per Unit Area) Acting on a Conductor

σ free
We have derived, using Gauss’ Law: Esurface ( r ) = = Esurface ( r )
εo

In vector notation: σ free Where n̂ is the outward pointing unit


Esurface ( r ) = nˆ
εo normal vector (outward = by convention).

From Griffiths Eqn’s 2.34-2.37, p. 89-90:


⎡⎣Vbabove ( rb ) − Vabelow ( ra ) ⎤⎦ lim
b b
Eabove = − ∫ E i d = ∫ ∇V i d = 0
a a
δ h→0

b ( surface of conductor is an equipotential )


½ δh

=0 σ free
½ δh Gave: ∇V above ( r ) − ∇V below ( r ) =− nˆ
ε0
a
∂V ( r ) σ
Ebelow OR: ≡ ∇V ( r )inˆ = − free
surface of conductor ∂n surface surface εo

∂V ( r )
OR: σ free = − ε o
∂n surface

If Esurface ( r ) or Vsurface ( r ) is known, then σ free can be obtained (and/or vice-versa).

©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 5


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

FORCE & PRESSURE ON A CONDUCTOR

Consider an arbitrarily-shaped conductor, with σ free coulombs


m2 ( )
free charge residing on its
surface. Infinitesimally small surface “patch,” of surface area Apatch = π R 2 .

• R

Apatch = π R 2

Now Apatch also has surface charge σ free on it. The total charge of this patch is Qpatch = π R 2σ free .

Edge-on view of infinitesimally small patch:


σ free σ
nˆ , E patch
above
= ( + nˆ ) = + free nˆ
2ε o 2ε o

+++++++ σ free on Apatch ( = π R 2 )

σ free σ
patch =
E below ( −nˆ ) = − free nˆ
2ε o 2ε o

We have discussed before (Griffiths Ex. 2.4, p. 73-74 and/or P435 Lect. Notes 2 p. 9-12) that a
surface charge σ has a (net) E -field ⊥ to surface on which σ resides, both above and below
the surface.

The transverse/tangential E -field components (on a flat surface, from symmetry) were shown to
cancel. (n.b. an infinitesimally small surface patch is FLAT.)

But we also said that Einside ( r ) = 0 inside a conductor! How do we reconcile these two
statements?
Consider an edge-on view of the (arbitrarily shaped conductor, but with the (infinitesimally)
small surface patch (of area Apatch) removed:
σ free on surface
of conductor

6 ©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

Now consider just the electrostatic surface charge itself – i.e. mentally “erase” the presence of
the conductor altogether: Enet ( r ) circular “hole” where infinitesimal
n̂ patch of area Apatch = π R 2 was
(now removed)

The surface charge distribution is a (very!) special configuration that is an equipotential surface
– but it is still a collection of individual point charges (@ the microscopic level). Each individual
point charge q has its own radial electric field, Epoint ( r )
E point

We ask: what is the net electric field Enet ( r ) on the conductor’s surface? (e.g. at the location of
the “hole” where the patch of infinitesimal area Apatch = π R 2 was (which is now removed)).
It’s hard to rigorously prove the following, for an arbitrarily-shaped charged conductor, but it
can be rigorously proved (analytically) for symmetrically-shaped conductors – e.g. a charged
sphere, with an infinitesimally small spherical cap removed, e.g. at its north pole. (see e.g. J.D.
Jackson’s book Electrodynamics for this proof…)
In general, for arbitrarily-shaped conductors, because their charged surfaces are equipotential
surfaces, the net electric field, Enet ( rpatch ) on the conductor’s surface, right at the “hole” location
of the (missing/removed) patch, associated with the free charge everywhere else on the
conductor’s surface, is:
σ free
Enet ( rpatch ) = + nˆ (!!!)
2ε o

infinitesimally above/below surface, @ the patch “hole” location:


σ free
Enet ( rpatch ) = Enet
above
( rpatch ) = Enetbelow ( rpatch ) = + nˆ
2ε 0

Thus, we see that: above outside


EToT ( rpatch ) = E patch
above
( rpatch ) + Enetabove ( rpatch )
σ free σ σ
above
EToT ( rp ) = 2ε o
nˆ + free nˆ = free nˆ
2ε o εo
And we also see that:
below inside
EToT ( rpatch ) = E patch
below
( rpatch ) + Enetbelow ( rpatch )
σ free σ
below
EToT ( rpatch ) = − 2ε o
nˆ + free nˆ = 0
2ε o

©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 7


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

Thus, the net electric field just above the surface of a conductor arises from two equal
contributions – the E patch from σ free on the infinitesimal patch of area Apatch = π R 2 itself, and the
net contribution from the free charge on the remainder of the conducting surface! Likewise, the
internal E field inside the conductor = 0, because these two contributions cancel each other!!!
Thus, VECTORIALLY, in the region of the infinitesimally small patch of area Apatch = π R on/at
the surface of the conductor, we have:

σ free
above outside
EToT ( rpatch ) = εo

Apatch

below inside
EToT (r ) = 0

above outside
EToT ( rpatch ) = E patch
above
( rpatch ) + Enetabove ( rpatch ) below inside
EToT ( rpatch ) = E patch
below
( rpatch ) + Enetbelow ( rpatch )
σ free σ σ σ free σ
above
EToT ( rp ) = 2ε o
nˆ + free nˆ = free nˆ
2ε o εo
below
EToT ( rpatch ) = − 2ε o
nˆ + free nˆ = 0
2ε o

We are now in a position to ask: what is the net/total force, Fpatch


total
( r ) acting on the
infinitesimally small patch, of area Apatch = π R 2 ?
1) There can be no contribution(s) to the net/total force, Fpatch
total
( r ) acting on the patch due to the
free surface charge, σ free (or associated E − fields E patch
above
( r ) + E below
patch ( r ) ) acting on the patch

itself (analogous to trying to lift yourself up by pulling on your shoes!)

total
Fpatch ( rpatch ) = Qpatch * Eat patch ( rpatch ) = Qpatch * Enet ( rpatch ) net E -field @ patch from σ free
elsewhere on conducting surface
⎛σ ⎞
total
Fpatch ( rpatch ) = σ free Apatch * Enet ( rpatch ) = σ free Apatch * ⎜ 2εfree nˆ ⎟
⎝ o ⎠

8 ©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

σ 2free ( rpatch )
F total
patch (r ) =
patch
2ε o
Apatch nˆ NOTE: this is a force which points in the outward
normal (⊥) direction!

If we sum up the infinitesimal force contributions from all the “patches” associated with the
entirety of the conducting surface, the magnitude of the force is:
σ 2free ( rpatch ) σ 2free
Fconductor ( rsurface ) = ∑ Fpatch ( rpatch ) = ∫
N
n.b. Assumption made here
total
dA = Aconductor
i =1
conductor 2ε o 2ε o is that σ free ( r ) = constant

Now, pressure ≡ force/unit area, i.e. P = F


A
Thus:
1 ⎛ σ free ( rsurface ) ⎞ ε o 2
2

Then, electrostatic pressure, P@ surface ( rsurface ) = ε o ⎜ ⎟ = E@ surface ( rsurface )


2 ⎜ ε 2
⎟ 2
⎝ o ⎠

Since: σ free ( rpatch ) ⎛ σ free ( rpatch ) ⎞


Esurface ( rpatch ) = 2 Enet ( rpatch ) = 2 nˆ = ⎜ ⎟ nˆ
2ε o ⎜ ε ⎟
⎝ o ⎠

1 ⎛ σ free ( rsurface ) ⎞ ε o 2
2

Then, electrostatic pressure, P@ surface ( rsurface ) = ε o ⎜ ⎟ = E@ surface ( rsurface )


2 ⎜ ε 2
⎟ 2
⎝ o ⎠

n.b. If electrostatic forces are able/capable of performing mechanical work W, then must do so at
the expense of electrostatic energy (recall that total energy must always be conserved!)
n.b. metals are elastic solids!!
⇒ Suppose a small area, a of the conductor is pulled into the electric field region by an
infinitesimal distance, Δx . Then work done by field on area, a is: F
area, a

Δx

⎛ F (r ) ⎞
ΔW ( r ) = F ( r )iΔx = ⎜ ⎟ ( aΔx ) = P@ surface ( r ) * aΔx = P@ surface ( r ) ΔV
F Δx
⎝ a ⎠ = volume, ΔV

OR: ΔW ( rsurface )
∴ ΔW ( rsurface ) = P@ surface ( rsurface ) ΔV P@ surface ( rsurface ) = = Energy Density, uE ( rsurface )
ΔV

Electrostatic Pressure, P (@ surface) = Volume Energy Density of Electrostatic Field, uE (@surface)


1
P@ surface ( r @ surface ) = U E @ surface ( r @ surface ) = ε o E@2 surface ( r @ surface )
2
Joules 3
m ( )
n.b. Electrostatic field exerts a negative pressure on conductor – i.e. electrostatic force on the
conductor pulls conductor into electrostatic field !!!

©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 9


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

CAPACITORS
A capacitor is a device that enables the storage (long and/or short term) of electric charge, Q.
Since there are electric fields associated with electric charge, a capacitor is also a device that
enables the storage (long and/or short term) of electrical energy.

One can make a simple capacitor using e.g. two parallel, very thin, conducting plates, separated
by a distance d and initially uncharged. Then, we put charge +Q e.g. on the upper plate and put
charge –Q on the lower plate. A potential difference, ΔVab = Vb ( z = d ) − Va ( z = 0 ) equipotential
surface now exists between the two plates, as shown in the figure below:
Vb ( z = d ) point b +Q on upper plate
+++++++++++++++++
+ + z=d
Potential +++++++++++++++++
Difference E (r )
d = plate separation

ΔVab = Vb ( z = d ) − Va ( z = 0 ) −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−
− − z=0
Equipotential Surface −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−
Va ( z = 0 ) point a −Q on lower plate

A static electric field E ( r ) exists between the parallel plates (n.b. If the length × width (L × W)
dimensions are both large in comparison to the plate separation, d i.e. L d and W d then
the electric field E ( r ) between the parallel plates will be nearly uniform inside the gap region –
i.e. E ( r ) E0 ( − zˆ ) = − E0 zˆ ← constant
We know that ΔVab = Vb ( z = d ) − Va ( z = 0 ) = − ∫ E ( r )id and that ∫ E ( r )i d
b b
is independent
a a
of the path taken from a → b .

So let’s simply take a path straight up along the ẑ axis − i.e. one that just barely touches the
insides of the plates:
Vb b +Q z=d we know:
+++++++++++++++ E = E0 ( − zˆ ) = − E0 zˆ
zˆ d d =d ( + zˆ ) = + d zˆ
−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−
Va a −Q z=0 E = constant, ≠ fcn of ( z )
both

ΔVAb = Vb ( z = d ) − Va ( z = 0 ) = − ∫ E id = + Ed , for L, W
b
d
a

both

E=
ΔVab Volts
d m( )
= constant for L, W d.

10 ©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

Then one can also see that if E = constant between conducting


⎛ both

plates ⎜ for L, W d ⎟ then ΔV ( z ) = Ez, where z is measured from the bottom plate (z = 0).
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠

From basic E&M principles, we know that E is linearly proportional to charge, Q


⎛ 1 ⎛Q⎞ ⎞
⎜ cf : E ( r ) = ⎜ 2 ⎟ rˆ for a point charge ⎟ .
⎝ 4πε o ⎝ r ⎠ ⎠

(
Similarly, the potential, V is also linearly proportional to the charge, Q cf : ΔV = − ∫ E id
c
)
The constant of proportionality is known as the capacitance, C of the system, i.e. we define
capacitance as the ratio of charge, Q to potential difference, ΔV associated with this system:
S.I. units of capacitance is FARADS, F
Q 1 Coulomb
C≡ 1 FARAD =
ΔV per volt
pot'l difference

both

Thus, for the case of the parallel plate capacitor, for L, W d we see that:
Q Q
capacitance of parallel plate capacitor ( L, W d) C≡ =
ΔVAB Ed

Using Gauss’ Law (integral form) on (any) one of the parallel plates - e.g. the upper plate – use
shrunken Gaussian pillbox as shown in figure below:

©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 11


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

Then:
Qencl
∫ s
E idA =
εo
dA1 = dA1 zˆ, E zˆ
=0
= ∫ E idA1 + ∫ E idA2 + ∫ E idA3 dA2 = dA2 ρˆ ( in x-y plane )
S1 S2 S3

E ⊥dA2
everywhere
on S2

dA3 = − dA3 zˆ
=0
= ( 0 zˆ )i( Adisk zˆ ) + ( − Ezˆ )i( − Adisk zˆ ) AS1 = AS3 = Adisk = π R 2
E = 0 inside upper plate (z > d )

Qencl = +σ Adisk

Qencl σ Adisk
= + EAdisk = =+
εo εo
σ
∴ E=
εo
Q Q Q
∴ C= = = εo but Q = σ Aplate
ΔVab Ed σd

ε o Aplate both

∴ C= for parallel plate capacitor, with L,W d


d

⇒ Note that capacitance, C depends only on ε o (electric permittivity of free space, 8.85×10−12
Farads/m) and (purely) geometrical factors (Aplate & d).

12 ©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

Forces on a Parallel Plate Capacitor

Suppose two parallel conducting plates, each of area A = L × W are separated by small
distance d L,W .
The potential difference between plates is initially ΔV . The top plate has surface charge density
+σ , the bottom plate has surface charge density −σ .

Top plate plate


+σ d separation
distance

b ẑ
potential Ο ŷ
ΔV ΔV
difference ΔV −σ E= ( − zˆ ) = − zˆ x̂
d d
a Bottom plate

ΔV = ΔVab = Vbtop − Vabottom

Neglecting fringe fields effects @ edges of parallel plate capacitor (valid approximation if
d L, W ):

force ⎛ Joules ⎞
Pressure = = field energy density uE ⎜ 3 ⎟
per unit area ⎝ m ⎠
2
F 1 1 ⎛ ΔV ⎞
P= = uE = ε o E 2 = ε o ⎜ ⎟
A 2 2 ⎝ d ⎠

2
1 1 ⎛ ΔV ⎞
Attractive force on (each) plate: F = P ⋅ A = uE ⋅ A = ε o E 2 A = ε o ⎜ ⎟ A (Newtons)
2 2 ⎝ d ⎠

Side view:


F top = − Fzˆ E
F bot = + Fzˆ x̂ ŷ
−σ

⎛ -plate ⎞
F ToT ⎜ ⎟ =F +F = − Fzˆ + Fzˆ = 0
TOP BOT

⎝ capacitor ⎠

No net force acts on parallel plate capacitor − Newton’s 1st Law: for every action, ∃ equal and
opposite reaction.

©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 13


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.
UIUC Physics 435 EM Fields & Sources I Fall Semester, 2007 Lect. Notes 5 Prof. Steven Errede

Griffiths EXAMPLE 2.11

Find the capacitance, C of two concentric spherical metal shells, with radii a & b, b > a.

Place +Q on inner sphere and place –Q on outer sphere. Use Gauss’ Law and show that
1 ⎛Q⎞
for a ≤ r ≤ b : E ( r ) = ⎜ ⎟ rˆ
4πε o ⎝ r 2 ⎠

⎧ b
⎪ΔVab = − ∫ E id
⎪ a
⎪ b
Then: ⎨ = − ∫ E idr

a

⎪ Q b 1 Q ⎛1 1⎞


=− ∫
4πε o ra 2
dr = ⎜ − ⎟ b>a
4πε o ⎝ a b ⎠

Then: Q 1 ab
Cconcentric ≡ = 4πε o = 4πε o
ΔVab ⎛1 1⎞ (b − a )
⎜ − ⎟
spheres

⎝a b⎠

Again, note that C depends only on ε o and (purely) geometrical factors (radii a & b)

How much work, W is done in charging up a capacitor − e.q. (if it is initially uncharged)?

Charging an initially uncharged capacitor means individually removing electrons from the upper plate
of the parallel-plate capacitor (inner sphere of concentric spherical capacitor) and transporting them
to the lower plate of the parallel-plate capacitor (outer sphere of concentric spherical capacitor),
respectively.
W
If ΔVab = (Griffiths 2.38, p.9) then W = QΔVab
Q
The infinitesimal amount of work dW needed to transport an infinitesimal amount of charge, dQ is
dW = ΔVdQ
Q ⎛Q⎞
But: ΔV = Therefore: dW = ⎜ ⎟ dQ
C ⎝C ⎠

The total work done in charging a capacitor from Q = 0 to Q = QToT is:

Q = QToT ⎛Q⎞ 1 Q =QToT 1 ⎛ QToT


2
⎞ 1 ⎛ QToT
2

WToT = ∫ dW = ∫ ⎜ ⎟ = ∫ = ⎜ ⎟ Thus: WToT = ⎜ ⎟ but: QToT = C ΔV
dQ QdQ
Q =0
⎝C ⎠ C Q = 0 2⎝ C ⎠ 2⎝ C ⎠
1 1 ⎛ Q2 ⎞ 1
constant ∴ WToT = C ΔV 2 = ⎜ ⎟ = Q ΔV
2 2⎝ C ⎠ 2

14 ©Professor Steven Errede, Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois


2005 - 2008. All rights reserved.

You might also like