0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views36 pages

Fluent Multiphase 19.0 L03 DPM

The document discusses discrete phase modeling (DPM) in ANSYS Fluent. DPM tracks particles in a Lagrangian frame coupled to an Eulerian continuous phase. Key aspects covered include DPM set up, injections, heat/mass transfer, turbulence modeling, boundary conditions, and a rough wall model.

Uploaded by

Amjad Ali Pasha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views36 pages

Fluent Multiphase 19.0 L03 DPM

The document discusses discrete phase modeling (DPM) in ANSYS Fluent. DPM tracks particles in a Lagrangian frame coupled to an Eulerian continuous phase. Key aspects covered include DPM set up, injections, heat/mass transfer, turbulence modeling, boundary conditions, and a rough wall model.

Uploaded by

Amjad Ali Pasha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 36

19.

0 Release

Lecture 03: Discrete Phase Model (DPM)


ANSYS Fluent Multiphase Flow Modeling

1 © ANSYS, Inc.
Outline

• Particulate Flow and DPM Applications

• Fundamentals of Discrete Phase Modeling (DPM)

• DPM Set Up in Fluent

• Post Processing

• Additional physics modeling features


− DDPM, DEM, Erosion-MDM

2 © ANSYS, Inc.
Dilute Dispersed Flows with Particles and Droplets

• Occur in many areas


– Automotive
– Power
– Environmental
– Health Care
– Fire Protection
– Consumer Products
– Electronics cooling

3 © ANSYS, Inc.
DPM Applications

Erosion in pipe bend

Cyclone separator
Particle inhalation

Spray impingement
4 © ANSYS, Inc.
Discrete Phase Model (DPM)

• Discrete Phase Model is a multiphase model in which the


dispersed phase is tracked in a Lagrangian reference frame
• Two different phases are defined in the DPM model:
− A continuous phase and a particle phase
• The discrete phase is modeled by the Lagrangian method 𝒅𝒑
• The continuous phase is modeled by the Eulerian method
• The discrete and continuous phases are coupled via sources 𝑼𝒒
terms in the governing equations
• Limiting assumption:
− DPM is valid for volume fraction lower than ~0.1, where the particle phase
is sufficiently dilute that particle-particle interactions and the effects of the 𝑳
particle volume fraction on the continuous phase can be neglected

5 © ANSYS, Inc.
Additional Simplifying Assumptions in DPM
What Assumption
Particle Volume Particle does not displace fluid (particle  mass point)
 Allows to neglect particle volume fraction in
continuous phase solver!
Particle Shape Particle is a sphere
 Simple (center + diameter)
 “Shape” needed for anything requiring the particle
surface (e.g. drag forces, heat-, mass transfer)
Flow in vicinity of particle Model flow details around particle
 Influence of flow details modeled by appropriate
(simple) assumptions
Number of particles Concept of particle parcel
 Track representative number of physical particles
 Details later in presentation

6 © ANSYS, Inc.
Particle Equation of Motion

• Particle position

• Particle velocity

• Particle angular velocity

7 © ANSYS, Inc.
Drag Force

• Particle relaxation time

• Particle relative Reynolds number

• Drag force

8 © ANSYS, Inc.
Particle Trajectory

• Other forces
− Rotational forces

− Thermophoretic force

− Brownian force Brownian Motion


Saffman Lift
− Saffman’s lift force

Virtual Mass
− Virtual mass force

− User-defined forces

9 © ANSYS, Inc.
Rotational Drag and Magnus Lift
Rotational drag Force
• Opposes rotational motion of particle
• Correlation in Fluent
‒ Dennis et al.
f  dp 
5
  
TRotational Drag    C   
2  2 
Magnus lift force
• Particle rotation generates lift force on particle
These forces are analogous to forces arising from
translational motion
• Translational drag
• Saffman lift
WWW.GRC.NASA.GOV

10 © ANSYS, Inc.
Parcel Concept

• It is very expensive to track each individual particle in a


particle flow system
− For a typical injection, the total particle number could be in millions!
• The solution: Parcel concept: Dukowicz (1980)
− Each parcel contains particles with same properties: diameter,
velocity, position, and others
− The behavior of each parcel is determined by the behavior of the
particles inside
− The number of particles in each parcel can be a fractional number

11 © ANSYS, Inc.
Coupling Between Phases

• One-way coupling:
Control volume
− DPM source term is updated
− Particle motion is affected by the continuous phase
− Continuous phase is not affected by the particle flow Particle Trajectory

Mass, Momentum and Heat


Exchange

• Two-way coupling:
− Particles and continuous flow interact with each other
− Particle motion is affected by the continuous phase
− Continuous phase is in turn is affected by the particle flow

12 © ANSYS, Inc.
Heat and Mass Transfer

• Heat transfer
𝒅𝑻𝒑 𝒅𝒎𝒑
𝒎𝒑 𝑪𝒑 = 𝒉𝑨𝒑 𝑻∞ − 𝑻𝒑 − 𝒉𝒇𝒈 + 𝑺𝒙
𝒅𝒕 𝒅𝒕
𝒉𝒅𝒑 𝟏 𝟏
𝑵𝒖 = = 𝟐. 𝟎 + 𝟎. 𝟔𝑹𝒆𝒅 𝟐 𝑷𝒓𝟑
𝒌∞
• Mass transfer
– Due to evaporation/boiling/devolatilization/heterogeneous-reactions
Particle Type Heat and Mass Transfer
Massless No drag! Used for Residence Time Distribution Studies
Inert Inert Heating and Cooling
Droplet Heating, Evaporation and Boiling
Multi-component Multi-component evaporation
Combusting Heating, Devolatilization and heterogeneous reaction
13 © ANSYS, Inc.
Setting Initial Conditions: Injections

• You will define Single


injection(s) which will
serve as a way to seed
the flow with the
discrete phase
• FLUENT provides 11
types of injections:
− Single
− Group Surface
− Cone / Solid Cone (3D)
− Atomizers
− Surface Hollow Cone
− File Group
− …
14 © ANSYS, Inc.
Injection Definition

• Every injection definition includes:


− Particle type (inert, droplet, or combusting particle)
− Material (from data base)
− Initial conditions (except when read from a file)
• Combusting particles and droplets require definition of destination species
• Stochastic tracking used to model turbulent dispersion
− Details on next slide
• Particle rotation can be modeled
− Additional equation solved to compute torque balance on particles including
• Rotational drag forces
• Magnus lift force

15 © ANSYS, Inc.
Incorporating Turbulence
When particles enter a turbulent eddy, they try to follow it for the time they are crossing
the eddy, depending on their Stokes number.
 This effect leads to lateral dispersion which has to be considered in modeling:
– Discrete random walk model (Stochastic Tracking)
• Accounts for local variations in flow properties
• Requires sufficient number of tries for accurate capture of turbulent dispersion
– Needed to achieve a statistically meaningful sampling
– Insufficient number of tries can lead to convergence
problems caused by non-smooth distribution of
particle sources

16 © ANSYS, Inc.
DPM Boundary Conditions
• Escape – Particle leaves the flow domain. • Wall Jet – Simulates an inviscid jet of
particles impacting the wall (no
significant liquid film is formed on the
wall).
• Trap – Particle is collected on the wall.

• Reflect – Particle bounces off the wall


• Wall Film – Similar to wall jet; simulates
with user-prescribed coefficient of
case where significant film is formed on
restitution.
the wall.

18 © ANSYS, Inc.
Rough Wall Model for Particles

• Virtual wall replaces the real wall during the


impact at the point of contact with particle
Virtual Wall
w
Real Smooth Wall
Dp

• The inclination angle w of the virtual wall is


sampled from a Gaussian distribution with 0
mean and standard deviation computed as a
function of
− Statistical surface roughness parameters
− Particle diameter

19 © ANSYS, Inc.
Particle Tracking Options

• Steady particle tracking with steady state solution


• Unsteady particle tracking with steady flow
• Unsteady particle tracking with unsteady flow
− Same particles and continuous phase time step size
− Different particles and continuous phase time step size

20 © ANSYS, Inc.
Steady Particle Tracking with Steady Flow

• DPM calculation at each Nth continuous phase iteration


• Particles tracked from injection point till final state/fate
N
• Tracking parameters
− Max. number of steps and
− Length scale or step length factor
• Integration time step is calculated as
− If length scale is specified
𝑳
• ∆𝒕 = 𝑼𝒑 +𝑼𝒄

− If step length factor is specified

t*  Estimated time required for particle to


∆𝒕∗
• ∆𝒕 = traverse the current cell

  Step length factor

21 © ANSYS, Inc.
Unsteady Particle Tracking with Steady Flow

• Each particle is ADVANCED from its last position


in the previous DPM calculation
– For specified particle time step size (tp) N
• With the integration time step calculated from tp
tracking parameters
– For J number of time steps
J

22 © ANSYS, Inc.
Unsteady Particle Tracking with Unsteady Flow
Different time step size for particles and
continuous phase
• Particle injection
– Particle Time Step
• Injecting particles in each particle time step
• Integration time step is the specified particle time step
– Fluid Flow Time Step
• Injecting particle in each flow time step
• Integration time step is the specified particle time step
– Particles will always be tracked in such a way that they
coincide with the flow time of the continuous flow solver
• As long as the maximum number of time steps used to
compute a single trajectory is sufficient

23 © ANSYS, Inc.
Solution Strategies for Steady Flows

• Two strategies possible:


− Closer coupling between dispersed and continuous flow:
• Increase under relaxation factor for Discrete Phase
• Decrease number of continuous phase calculations between trajectory calculations ( < 3 )
• Lower under relaxation factors for continuous phase.

− Decoupling of dispersed and continuous flow:


• Lower under relaxation factor for Discrete Phase.
• Increase number of continuous phase calculations between trajectory calculations ( > 15 )

• Smooth out particle source terms


− Increase number of stochastic particle trajectories

24 © ANSYS, Inc.
DPM Source Calculations
𝑬𝒏𝒆𝒘 = 𝑬𝒐𝒍𝒅 + 𝜶 𝑬𝑪𝒂𝒍𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒅 − 𝑬𝒐𝒍𝒅

• Effect of Under-Relaxation Factor (URF)


– DPM source terms calculated and updated at every
particle DPM iteration/time step
• # of particle iterations required for achieving full
source term increases with decrease in URF
• Must use URF of 1 if only one particle iteration is
done in a time step
– Calculations may not be stable in some cases
• Effect of update DPM Sources Every Flow Iteration
– Recommended for unsteady calculations
• Particle source terms calculated every DPM iteration
and updated every continuous phase iteration

25 © ANSYS, Inc.
Postprocessing: Viewing Trajectories

26 © ANSYS, Inc.
Particle Track Export

• To export particle tracks for viewing in


other post-processing tools such as CFD-
Post or Ensight, use Export > Particle
History Data in the File menu
− Select File Type, injection, exported particle
variables
• By default, only particle geometry, ID and
residence time are exported
− In CFD-Post, use Import from the File menu
• The Insert menu can only be used to import
particle tracks calculated in CFX

27 © ANSYS, Inc.
Time Statistics of Particle Variables

• Ability to post process DPM variables


− Mean and RMS values for transient simulations

28 © ANSYS, Inc.
Time Statistics of Particle Variables

• Data sampling for Time Statistics of DPM post processing variables

29 © ANSYS, Inc.
Report Definitions for DPM

• Report definitions can be used to


monitor DPM variables as the solution
progresses
– Injected Mass
– Mass in Domain
– Evaporated Mass
– Penetration Length
– Escaped Mass

• Can be plotted as the solution


progresses and/or saved to a file

30 © ANSYS, Inc.
Additional DPM Physics Modeling Features: DDPM and DEM

• As the volume fraction of particles increases,


particulate flow changes from the dilute
disperse flow regime to the dense disperse
flow regime, and four-way coupling
develops
− Particle-particle interaction and particle volume
displacement can no longer be neglected
• There are a number of extensions to DPM
allowing these effects to be represented
− Dense Discrete Phase Model (DDPM)
− Discrete Element Model (DEM)
− Macroscopic Particle Model (MPM)

31 © ANSYS, Inc.
Overview of Modeling Approaches
DDPM-DEM:
Particles colored by residence time
• Dense Discrete Phase Model (DDPM)
– Treats secondary phase solids as discrete particles
dispersed in continuous fluid
– Particle-Particle collisions are either modeled (KTGF based
approach) or explicitly resolved (DEM based approach)
– Applicable from dilute to dense particulate flows with
wide particle size distribution
– Compatible with species transport, homogeneous and
heterogeneous reactions
DEM

• Discrete Element Method (DEM)


– Soft-sphere contact model to explicitly resolve particle-
particle collisions
– Efficiently handles dense and near packing limit
particulate flows

32 © ANSYS, Inc.
Overview of Modeling Approaches

• Macroscopic Particle Model (MPM)


− Available under addon-modules
− Particle scale simulation
− Particles are not point masses anymore
− Number of particles limited by computational expense
• Up to a few hundred particles
− Collisions mostly instantaneous and binary

Particle larger than several


cells (~10 or more)

33 © ANSYS, Inc.
Additional DPM Physics Modeling Features: Erosion
• Erosion is a complex process that is affected by Sand Erosion in a bend
numerous factors and small changes in operational
conditions can significantly affect the damage it
causes
• Erosion leads to a reduction in expected life time of
piping systems, and is therefore vital in risk
management studies
• Fluent's DPM provides validated solid-particle flow
modeling capabilities for a wide range of sand particle
sizes and loadings
– A wide array of industry-accepted erosion models, as
well as the ability to include proprietary erosion
models if needed
– The ability to deform the pipe wall if erosion is
affecting the flow pattern

34 © ANSYS, Inc.
DPM Erosion Modeling

Post-process particle tracks


Define Erosion Models at Walls – can use and erosion contours
multiple models at same time
• only when erosion modeling performed as a
post-processing operation
35 © ANSYS, Inc.
Erosion-MDM Coupling
Contour of Total Eroded
Distance

Contour of Erosion Rate


DPM erosion simulations can be coupled with
Dynamic Mesh (MDM) allowing walls to deform
due to particle induced erosion
• Quasi automatic mesh deformation setup of all
participating walls
• Simulation driven by mesh deformation time step,
i.e. allowable cell deformation, but uses a steady
state fluid solution

36 © ANSYS, Inc.
Summary

• Discrete Phase Model (DPM) allows tracking of dilute, dispersed secondary phases using the
Lagrangian method
− Secondary phases can be solid particles, liquid droplets, air bubbles, so long as the requirement of volume
fraction < 0.10 is satisfied
• Linear motion of particles in the surrounding continuous flow field is computed using Newton's
Second Law of Motion
− Forces acting on particles include drag and can include various other forces as appropriate for the problem
being solved
• DPM particles can exchange momentum, heat and mass (including species) with the continuous
phase
• Basic set up includes defining one or more injections, defining wall DPM boundary conditions and
setting particle tracking options and parameters (such as interaction with continuous phase)
• Particle Tracking display used for flow visualization of particles
• Additional features extend particle tracking to dense-dispersed flows and erosion

37 © ANSYS, Inc.

You might also like