Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp.

387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND

LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

Review
Received 3 April 2018
Revised 12 July 2018
Ilinka Terziyska 30 September 2018
12 November 2018
Accepted 28 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.24.2.8

Abstract
Purpose – The main objective of this paper is to identify global trends in wine tour design, and
based on these findings, analyse the structure and spatial distribution of wine tours offered by tour
operators in Bulgaria.
Design/methodology/approach – The study combines qualitative and quantitative approaches,
drawing data from the official websites of specialised travel agencies and tour operators. Firstly,
content analysis was used to outline global trends and classify wine tours. Secondly, a quantitative
study of 63 wine tours in Bulgaria was made, discussing selected features such as: average prices,
additional activities, the number of wineries visited etc.
Findings – Wine tours are becoming increasingly diverse on a global scale: the study has identified
eleven different types of wine tours, catering to different segments of the wine tourism market.
Wine tours offered in Bulgaria are focused on cultural attractions and the average number of
wineries visited is small. Most of the itineraries are concentrated in only two of the five wine
regions in country.
Originality of the research – While scientific research on wine tourism is abundant, the products
of niche tour operators/travel agencies in this sphere have not been sufficiently studied as yet.
Keywords Wine tours, Trends, Emerging destinations, Tour operators, Wine Tourism

INTRODUCTION

Wine tourism has been defined as the “visitation to vineyards, wineries, wine festivals
and wine shows for which grape wine tasting and/or experiencing the attributes of a grape
wine region are the prime motivating factors for visitors” (Hall, Longo, Mitchell, &
Johnson, 2000). It is usually associated with the appeal of wineries and the wine country
as a whole, and is seen as a form of niche marketing and destination development, on the
one hand, and an opportunity to increase sales and revenues on the part of the wine
industry on the other. Wine itself is increasingly seen as a cultural good (Marks, 2011)
and as such can be used to contribute to improving destination image.

One of the forms in which wine tourism is practiced is through organized wine tours.
Although an increasing number of tourists arrange the details of their trip by themselves,
tour operators and travel agencies are still preferred by a significant number of
customers, especially for international travel. The growing independency of tourists,
however, results in increased levels of competition and subsequent diversification and/or
specialization of offering, and a search for innovative product design. Wine tourism

387
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

packages offered by tour operators form a relatively smaller share compared to FITs
(Fully independent travelers); yet, they are an important revenue source for wineries and
an opportunity for the whole wine region. There are various forms which the package
may take – escorted or self-guided, duration may vary from one day to two weeks or
even more, the size of the group might be larger than 10 persons or it may be an
individual experience. Target groups may be foreign or domestic tourists and additional
attractors range from cultural and natural heritage to adventure and even shopping. In
terms of visitor origin, most studies report a ratio of 40%-60% for international and
domestic visitors respectively (Science and Technology Park for Tourism and Leisure of
Catalonia, 2012), although figures may vary for different destinations. As reported in a
study on Australian wine tourism, Semi-independent travelers (SITs, 47%) and fully-
independent travelers (FITs, 34%) form the largest shares of international wine tourists
with tour group and package travelers counting for 19% of the total number (Tourism
Research Australia, 2014).

This paper looks at organized wine tours, attempting to identify the main trends and the
various forms they take. The study combines quantitative and qualitative analysis,
drawing data from the official websites of specialized travel agencies and tour operators,
and is clearly divided into two sections: the first one is dedicated to identifying global
trends in wine tour design, while the second one is focused on the current situation in
Bulgaria. Following a difficult restructuring from a centrally-planned to a market-
oriented system in the 1990s, the wine industry in the country underwent a decade of
decline before gaining positions on both international and domestic markets and can be
used as an exemplifier of an emerging wine tourism destination in its earliest stage of
development. According to the Executive Agency on Vine and Wine (EAVW, 2017), by
October 2017 there were 259 registered wine producers in Bulgaria, around one-third of
which offer wine tasting. Most of these were established after the year of 2000, and a lot
of new wineries are still being opened each year. Despite this positive trend, the share of
wineries involved in tourism is still small compared to other emerging wine destinations
– Alonso and Liu, for example report a share of 81 per cent in West Australia (Alonso &
Liu, 2010). In terms of wine production, the country usually ranks among the top 10 wine
producers in Europe and exhibits slow growth for the period from 2014 to 2018 (Eurostat,
2018). Although the country is mainly popular as a sea-side destination, a recent study
by Dimitrov et al claims that culture (a part of which is wine and wine-related activities)
is the key factor of its attractiveness (Dimitrov, Stankova, Vasenska, & Uzunova, 2017).

1. LITERATURE REVIEW

Wine tourism first started to attract the attention of academics in the beginning of the
1990s, and since then, the topic has been a subject of increasing interest. Mitchel and
Hall identify seven major themes discussed in literature: the wine tourism product and
its development; wine tourism and regional development; the size of the winery visitation
market; winery visitor segments; the behavior of the winery visitor; the nature of the
visitor experience; and biosecurity risks posed by visitors (Mitchel & Hall, 2006). A
much broader grouping is suggested by Kunc – wine tourism as a product and winery
visitation as the behavior of wine tourists (Kunc, 2010). If we are to place the subject of

388
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

this study within these frames, it will be part of the wine tourism product research, but
will also be informed by visitor motivation and visitor experience studies.

Research on organized wine tourism is limited; in fact it is only sporadically mentioned

when discussing the organized/ individual ratio for winery visits (Tourism Research
Australia, 2014). One of the few studies on the topic - a paper on the activities of tour
operators in Bulgaria (Terziyska & Kyurova, 2014), reports that approximately 13% of
agencies specializing in cultural tourism include wine and gourmet in their tours. Given
the scarcity of research dedicated specifically on wine tours, this literature review will
be focused on the factors that impact wine tour design – wine visitor motivation, wine
tourist profiles and typologies and the demand for wine tourism on the whole.

Visitor motivation in wine tourism has been largely researched. In 2004, based on review
of previous studies, Alant and Bruwer identify the following motivating factors as
primary: tasting wine, having a nice tasting experience, buying wine, enjoying different
wines, finding a unique wine, and finding interesting and special wines, while
motivations such as finding information, socializing, having a day out, eating at winery,
meeting the wine-maker, picnic/BBQ, entertainment and rural setting were found to be
secondary (Alant & Bruwer, 2004). Obviously, wine stands at the core of tourist
motivation, with a focus not only on quality, but also on differentness, uniqueness and
local character (which are actually interconnected). This was to a great extent confirmed
in a more recent study by Grybovych et al. (2013), who identified almost the same set of
motives but grouped them into three factors: Factor 1 – to learn about the wine and
winemaking process, Factor 2 – to gain authentic Northeast Iowa experience, Factor 3 –
to enjoy having a good time. The importance of the educational aspect was also revealed
in a study on Greek wine tourists, where learning about wine and wine making was
identified as the second strongest motive (Alebaki and Iakonidou, 2010). Marzo-Navvaro
and Pedraja-Iglesias (2012) added to these another element – the cultural product, while
Bruwer and Rueger-Muck (2018) emphasized the hedonic nature of wine tourism
motivation. The findings of a study carried out in Serbia (a neighboring country of
Bulgaria) in 2016 seem to give more emphasis on the core wine product: visit wineries,
tasting wine, buying wine, trying out different types of wine, meeting wine producers,
obtaining information about wine and its production, and the only motivations outside
wine are tasting local food and organization of the trip (transport, accommodation,
activities) (Sekulić, Mandarić, & Milovanović, 2016). The latter (organization of the trip)
is directly related to organized wine tours and could be part of the pull factors: when
speaking of less known destinations, tourists might be attracted by the provision of well-
designed organized tours.

A well-structured instrument for identifying wine tourism motivation, which forms a

solid basis for segmentation, was offered by Quintal et al. (Quintal, Thomas, Phau, &
Soldat, 2017). It consists of six factors with 18 push-pull winescape attributes, resulting
in four groups of wine tourists: inspireds, self-driven, market-driven, and inerts.

As in all other businesses, consumer profiling is essential for wine tour design and
predestines the variety of tours targeted to different segments. Most typologies of wine
tourists are based on their motivation, knowledge, lifestyles, and wine involvement. One
of the most cited typologies (wine lovers, wine interested, and wine curious), for

389
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

example, is based on interest in wine (Hall C. M., 1996). Some authors distinguish
between subjective and objective segmentation bases (Molina, 2015).

A study that is particularly informative for wine tour design is the one conducted by the
Australian government, as it profiles food and wine tourists according to their interest in
wine and preferences to holiday activities. The authors identify 5 distinct types, as
follows (Tourism Research Australia, 2014):
 Low interest - Interest in food and wine tourism experiences is low; no particular
type of experience preferred.
 Local authenticity - Food and wine experiences are a tool for exploring a destination
- its people and culture. Highly interest in: authentic local produce, street food, local
and farmers’ markets, regional specialties, eating/drinking in spectacular
surroundings.
 Traditionalists - Interested in the ‘classic’ experiences: food and wine heritage, fine
dining restaurants, wineries, food/wine tours, food/wine trails, events/festivals.
 Generalists - Show no particular preference for types of experiences; moderate level
of interest to wine and food.
 Niche experiencers - Interested in specialized and more intensive food and wine
experiences; expressed preferences for hands-on experiences, cooking courses,
indigenous food experiences.

The group of local authenticity seekers is reported as most dominant in the report, while
niche experiencers form the smallest share.

The only study that attempts to profile wine tourists in Bulgaria is the one of Dimitrov
(2014), who states that the main share of wine tourists is in the 37-49 age bracket, with
good knowledge of wine, looking for something new.

Another dimension of wine tourists’ behavior that can inform wine tour design is the
number of wineries visited per day. A study on travel behaviors of wine tourists in
Michigan’s Leelanau Peninsula identified an average of 3.91 wineries visited per day,
while other attractions had a mean of 0.58 (McCole & Popp, 2014). While no other
studies reporting the average number of wineries visited per day were found, an
examination of wine tours offered by travel agencies in Italy and France reveal that the
most common number is 2-3.

2. METHODOLOGY

In accordance with the two-fold objective of this study, the research process was divided
into two stages, both based on content analysis (Figure 1). The first stage aimed at
identifying the different types of wine tours (based on theme and included activities) and
employed content analysis of numerous sites of specialized tour operators, travel
websites such as Trip Advisor, and articles presenting rankings of best wine tours (e.g.
“World’s Top Wine Tours” (Shoenfeld), “10 of the world’s greatest wine tours” (Trend,
2016) , etc.). The analysis included exploration of the main topic in the tours’ names and

390
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

slogans, the activities included, the sites visited within the tours, and the overall emphasis
in the text describing the offer. This part of the study was conducted between September-
December 2016.

The second research stage was to a great extent informed by the findings of the content
analysis described above. It was however focused on wine tours offered in Bulgaria and
combined qualitative with quantitative approach. Starting with content study of the
websites of specialized tour operators in Bulgaria in order to identify selected features of
wine tours such as price, theme, geographical distribution, and duration, we have then
tried to quantify them (using percentage and means where appropriate) so that the
structure of this specific sector in the tour operator market in the country can be revealed.
The most challenging aspect was to collect a sufficiently comprehensive list of wine tour
offers as there is neither official nor non-official source containing the necessary
information. It was therefore decided to search the internet using the keywords “wine
tours in Bulgaria” (as well as their equivalent in Bulgarian) and then record the search
results. This resulted in a pool of data containing details on tour operator name, link to
the specific offer (as to avoid duplication of results), length of tour (in days), price,
number of wineries visited within the tour, activities and attractions included in the tour
programme, and wine regions where the tour takes place. A total of 63 wine tours were
identified, offered by 24 different tour operators / travel agencies. The data was gathered
in the period January-March 2017.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Types of wine tours

According to the Georgia Declaration on Wine Tourism, “Wine tourism facilitates the
linking of destinations around the common goal of providing unique and innovative
tourism products, whereby leveraging synergies in tourism development, surpassing
traditional tourism subsectors” (UNWTO, 2016, p. 42). This trend is best represented in
wine tours, which in recent years have demonstrated increasing richness of topics around
which the experience is organized. Of course, this diversity is only possible through
synergies.

The review of wine tour offers found on the internet has resulted in the following
classification, based on the underlying tour theme:
 Standard wine tours – usually includes visits to two or three wineries per day, no
additional activities or attractions emphasized in the offer.
 Wine & Culture tours: matching wine tasting with visits to cultural attractions.
 Wine & Food tours – one of the most popular combinations, food ranging from local
to gourmet.
 Luxury wine tours – usually private or small group ones, with an emphasis on luxury
transport and/or accommodation, and gourmet dining.

391
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

 Responsible wine tours: the emphasis here is on organic / bio dynamic vineyards
and wines, support of local communities, joint projects with local people and
organizations, efforts for limiting the negative impact on the environment, close
contact with local culture. The Responsible Wine Tasting section of
responsibletravel.com currently includes 20 tours to 12 countries (Responsible
Travel, 2017)
 Transport-specific wine tours: This group includes tours that rely on less common
means of transport to set apart from competitors. Usually this is highlighted in the
name of the tour (Classic Convertible Wine Tours, Napa Valley Balloon Ride &
Wine Tour Package, Perth’s Famous Wine Cruise, etc.). The variety of vehicles used
includes limousine, hot balloon, helicopter, boat and others.
 Active / adventure wine tours: combining wine tasting with adventure or sports
experience (in softer or more extreme form). This type of products are aimed at
physically active consumers, additional activities may be cycling, horse riding,
trekking, or even skiing. The combination of skiing and wine is particularly popular
in Argentina and Chile. Bike tours, on the other hand, are more common in Italy,
France, Austria, and South Africa.
 Innovative wine tours – these are tours that incorporate activities that are totally
unrelated to wine, thus forming a unique selling proposition (USP). One of the most
striking examples is the Murder Mystery Wine & Dinner Tour, offered in the Finger
Lakes Region in the USA, where wine tasting is coupled with a crime-solving game,
with clues being picked at the different sites visited within the tour (Experience! The
Finger Lakes, 2017).
 Connoisseur wine tours – targeted at people with profound knowledge and interest
in wines, usually include lectures and discussions with professional enologists.
Sometimes this comes at the expense of additional leisure activities and sightseeing.
 Wine and nature tours – visits to wineries are coupled with nature-related activities
such as bird-watching.
 Wine and spa – a combination that is gaining increasing popularity.

The underlying trend in all identified types is the striving towards diversifying the offer,
by combining wine with activities that suit individual needs and preferences of
consumers.

It would be also interesting how these types of tours, identified through analysis of
current supply, correspond to the demand-oriented profiling of wine tourists as described
in the literature review. If we take as a basis the typology of the Australian tourism
research team (Tourism Research Australia, 2014), which is one of the most popular, and
as mentioned above – most elaborate as it encompasses both preferences for wine and
leisure activities, we could presume that standard tours are targeted at traditionalists or
connoisseurs, the wine and culture to traditionalists or low interest (depending on the
wine experience / cultural sites ratio), and the wine and food ones – to niche experiencers.
Responsible tours, too, would attract niche experience, but are more targeted at
authenticity seekers. Wine and nature tours are strongly related to lifestyle and
environmentally-conscious consumers – a category that is not included in the above-cited
tourist typology. These assumptions are of course highly hypothetical and should be

392
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

verified by further research, which would rather define a more detailed and up-to-date
profiling of wine tourists.

3.2. Characteristics of wine tours in Bulgaria

The following characteristics are based on data collected from 63 wine tours offered in
Bulgaria and comprises information about the average price, the type of tour (standard,
cultural, eco, etc.), the average number of wineries visited per day, and the wine regions
included in the tour. The latter was used to find out if the tour operators/travel agents
show preference for certain wine regions, which could both be a sign of their
attractiveness and impact their tourism development. The programmes of included tours
were also examined to obtain qualitative information regarding innovative practices. Fig.
1: Distribution of wine tours by durationpresents the distribution of the sample by tour
duration.

Fig. 1: Distribution of wine tours by duration

8-14 days one-day

27% 32%

4-7 days
25%

three-day
16%

In terms of tour duration, one day tours predominate, forming 32% of the total, followed
by the longest type – 8-14 day tours with 27%. This is quite in line with the trend
identified by a study on visitor behavior on the Setúbal Peninsula Wine Route, where the
most common patterns that authors identify based on interviews with ravel agencies lie
at the two extremes: one-day and longer than a week tours (Reigadinha & Cravidão,
2016). The share of 3-day tours is the smallest (16%), and 4-7 day tours account for 25%
of the total number of tours included in the study.

3.2.1. Characteristics of one-day tours offered in Bulgaria

One-day tours are the most popular type of packages for organized wine tourism. The
findings that follow are based on 20 different packages that were found online either on
travel agencies’ websites or on Trip Advisor. The predominant number offer a visit to
only one winery (Fig. 2) and the average number is 1,44, which is less than the common
practice worldwide, where usually two and sometimes three or four wineries are visited
within a day. The average price for a one-day wine tour is 109,45 Euro.

393
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

Fig. 2: Number of wineries visited on one-day tours

three
wineries
10%
two
wineries
20%
one
winery
70%

These figures are directly connected with the thematic structure of one-day tours –
smaller numbers of winery visits are compensated by including cultural attractions. As
shown in Table 1 only 25 percent of tours are standard ones – the predominant share
blend wine and culture, and only 10 percent combine wine and food. All the standard
tours are actually offered by two companies, the only large tour operator specializing in
wine tourism in Bulgaria, and a smaller travel agency also specialized in wine tourism.
In the group of wine & culture tours, only two ones stand out by offering local food and
crafts, a visit to a bakery and peach brandy making. The only innovative product is the
active wine tour, which includes snowshoeing in the mountain of Rila.

Table 1: Distribution of 1 day wine tours by theme and wine regions (n=18)

Indicator Number of wineries Share

Theme
Wine and culture 12 60%
Standard 5 25%
Wine and food 2 10%
Active 1 5%
Wine regions included in the tour
Thracian Lowlands 9 45%
Struma Valley 9 45%
Rose Valley 2 10%

As seen in Table 1, there is no great variety in the destinations for one-day tours – the
most popular ones are the Thracian Lowlands and the Struma Valley both accounting for
45% of the total number of tours, with only two packages (10%) offering trips to wineries
situated in the Rose Valley. This could be most probably explained by the fact that these
former two wine regions are at the closest proximity to and hence most easily accessible
from the capital city of Sofia; in addition, the city of Plovdiv, which is one of the top
cultural destinations in Bulgaria and the European capital of Culture 2019 is situated in
the Thracian Lowlands. Moreover, the headquarters of the largest tour operator

394
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

specializing in wine tourism are there. The Rose Valley wine region (the smallest in the
country) is also located within a reasonable distance from Plovdiv and is very rich in
cultural heritage.

3.2.2. Characteristics of 3-day wine tours offered in Bulgaria

Within this study, 3-day tours are the least popular ones – only 16% of the total number
of identified offers are of this duration. The average price per day is 84.33 Euro, which
is less than the average price of one-day tours. The average number of wineries visited
per day is even smaller – 0.84. As presented in Fig. 3, the predominant share of tours
offer visits to only two wineries for within the whole trip, which reflects the pattern of
one-day tours – but the average number is smaller because the last day of the tour is left
for the departure journey and there are no activities included.

Fig. 3: Distribution of 3-day tours according to the number of wineries visited

(n=10)

five one winery

wineries / / tasting
tastings 10%
20%
three
wineries /
tastings two
10% wineries /
tastings
60%

Wine and culture remains the most popular theme for three-day tours (Table 2), followed
by standard tours focused mainly on wine. Wine and spa also seems to be a preferred
combination, given the abundant spa resources in Bulgaria (one of the wineries features
a spa hotel), and there is one tour that combines winery visits with walks in the nature,
with an option of a bicycle tour (upon request). One of the wine&culture tours offers
accommodation in a local farm, which is an example of a good practice, beneficial for
both the local community and the visitor experience.

395
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

Table 2: Distribution of 3-day wine tours by theme and wine region (n=10)

Indicator Number of wineries Share

Theme
Wine and culture 4 40%
Standard 3 30%
Wine and spa 2 20%
Wine and nature 1 10%
Wine regions included in the tour
Thracian Lowlands 7 58%
Struma Valley 3 25%
Danubian Plain 1 8%
Rose Valley 1 8%

The number of wine regions featured in three-day tours is a bit larger compared with
one-day tours. The Thracian Valley is the most popular one, represented in 58% of tours,
followed by the Struma Valley. The Danubian Plain is included in only one of the tours,
and so is the Rose Valley. In two of the packages there are visits to more than one region,
which is made possible by the longer duration of the trip.

3.2.3. Characteristics of 4-7 day wine tours offered in Bulgaria

The average price per day is 103.95 Euro, which is above the figure for three-day tours
and closer to one-day tours. The average number of wineries visited per day is 0.79,
which is far less than world standards.

This type of tours exhibits the greatest variety of themes covered, ranging from “wine
and culture” (the most popular) to active holidays combining wine and golf, or ATV
driving to the Belogradchik Rocks (Table 3). Wine and culture still remains the most
popular theme, accounting for nearly one-third of the total number of tours in this group.

Table 3: Distribution of 4-7 day wine tours by theme and wine regions (n=16)

Indicator Number of tours Share

Theme
wine and culture 5 31%
responsible (local culture) 2 13%
food and wine 2 13%
active 2 13%
wine and nature 1 6%
standard 3 19%
wine and spa 1 6%
Wine regions included in the tour
Struma Valley 8 36%
Thracian Lowlands 10 45%
Danubian Plain 4 18%

396
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

Quite similar to the previous types of tours, there are two regions that receive the
prevalent share of tours, and again these are the Thracian Lowlands and the Valley of
Struma. The Danubian Plain is also present, accounting for 18 percent of the total.

3.2.4. Characteristics of 8-14 days’ wine tours offered in Bulgaria

The analysis of the 8-14 days’ wine tours offered in Bulgaria is based on 17 offers of
tour operators/travel agencies, identified through the preliminary online search, forming
more than one-fourth of the total number of wine tours included in the study. The longer
duration of these tours predetermines some of their characteristics – more comprehensive
experience and more emphasis on additional activities. Most of the tours are of the wine
and culture type (Table 4), where wine tasting and visits to cultural attractions seem to
have equal share in the tour programme – for most of the tours the cultural tourism aspect
even seems to predominate. There is only one tour that has an explicit focus on local
culture, and one tour which is marketed as a combination of wine and nature. The latter
is the most innovative one in this group and features bird-watching.

Table 4: Distribution of 8-14 day wine tours by theme and wine region (n=17)

Indicator Share Number of tours

Theme
Wine and culture 88% 15
Responsible / local culture 6% 1
Wine and nature 6% 1
Wine regions included in the tour
Thracian Lowlands 88% 15
Danubian Plains 71% 12
Valley of Struma 65% 11
Rose Valley 41% 7
Black Sea 29% 5
Only one region included 18% 3

In terms of wine regions included in the tours, there is a clear predominance of three
regions – the Thracian Valley, the Danubian Plains, and the Valley of Struma over the
Black Sea and the Rose Valley. This is also the only type of tours that feature the Black
Sea wine region in the itinerary. As evident from Table 4, most tours include more than
one region; yet there are three packages where the whole trip is limited to only one wine
region.

The average number of wineries visited per day for this type of tours remains very low
– 0.74, which reflects the overall trend observed in the country. The average price per
day is 90.25 Euro.

If we try to relate the supply characteristics of the wine tours market in Bulgaria with the
wine tourist typologies presented in the literature review (the demand side)we could
conclude that the market is still oriented towards the low interest and the generalist
segments. Traditionalists, niche experiencers and local authenticity seekers are only
catered by a very small number of offers, and this is extremely evident in longer tours

397
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

(more than three days long), while in shorter ones, the first steps towards diversification
and targeting to the more specialized segments is witnessed.

CONCLUSION

On a world scale, organized wine tours offered by travel agencies and tour operators are
characterized by increasing diversity and products that cater to the needs and preferences
of every segment possible – from the basic standard offer, through the responsible, the
gourmet, adventurous, the connoisseur, to those who seek luxury.

Apart from identifying the latest trends in wine tour design, the present study gives a
snapshot of the present situation in Bulgaria – an emerging wine destination, which has
not yet uncovered its full potential. Apart from the slight differences in the four groups
of tours, the sector shares a lot of common features, the most evident of which seems to
be the small number of wineries included in the tour programme. The share of standard
tours that feature at least two winery visits per day and have a strong focus on wine is
significantly smaller than the wine&culture type, where the cultural aspect seems to
overshadow the wine experience. The overall impression is that to a package that is
purely cultural in nature, a visit to a winery is added so that it can be marketed as a wine
tour. Innovative products are mainly represented by matching wine and nature-related
activities; unfortunately, local cuisine and local wines are not given due attention.
Connoisseur tours are also missing, thus ignoring a very important segment of the wine
tourism market.

The average price per day ranges for different types of tours ranges between 80 to 110
Euro, the most expensive being one-day tours, which are also the most popular. It is
however difficult to compare this with other wine destinations, unless a benchmarking
tool is established, which would provide opportunities for comparing other product
features too.

In terms of territorial distribution, there are two regions that benefit from organized wine
tours – the Thracian Lowlands and the Valley of Struma, which is mainly due to their
favorable location – close the capital. In recent years the capital city of Sofia has seen a
significant rise in tourist arrivals, which strongly affected the demand for organized tours
– especially one-day ones. The only type of tours that show a diversity of wine regions
are the 8-14 day tours, which is quite predictable because longer duration allows a larger
geographical spread.

On the whole, the sector of organized wine tours in Bulgaria seems to be in its initial
stage of development, with only one larger specialized company operating on the market.

398
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

REFERENCES
Alant, K., Bruwer, J. (2004), “Wine Tourism Behaviour in the Context of a Motivational Framework for Wine
Regions and Cellar Door”, Journal of Wine Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 25-37.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0957126042000300308
Alebaki, M., Iakovidou, O. (2010), “Segmenting the Greek wine tourism market using a motivational
approach”, New Medit, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 31-40.
Alonso, A.D., Liu, Y. (2010), “Wine tourism development in emerging Western Australian regions”,
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 245-262.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111011018214
Bruwer, J. and Rueger-Muck, E. (2018), “Wine tourism and hedonic experience: A motivation-based
experiential view”, Tourism and Hospitality Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358418781444
Dimitrov, P., Stankova, M., Vasenska, I., Uzunova, D. (2017), “Increasing attractiveness and image recognition
of Bulgaria as a tourism destination”, Tourism & Management Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, 39-47.
https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2017.13305
Dimitrov, V. (2014), Socio-demographic characteristics of wine tourists in Bulgaria (in Bulgarian). Viticulture
and vinicultue / Lozarstvo i vinarstvo, 4.
EAVW. (2017, October 1), Viticultural Register. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from Executive Agency on Vine
and Wine: http://www.eavw.com/index.php?lg=bg&menuid=5&submenuid=1222
Eurostat. (2017, February 25), Wine dashboard. Retrieved from
https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/dashboards/wine-dashboard_en.pdf
Experience! The Finger Lakes. (2017, February 25), Murder Mystery Wine and Dinner Tour. Retrieved from
Experience the Finger Lakes: http://experiencefingerlakes.com/culinary-wine-events/wine-and-
culinary-tours/murder-mystery-wine-tour/
Grybovych, O., Lankford, J., Lankford, S. (2013), “Motivations of wine travelers in rural Northeast Iowa”,
International Journal of Wine Business Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 285-309.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-07-2012-0023
Hall, C.M. (1996), “Wine tourism in New Zealand”, In G. Kearsley (Ed.), Tourism Down Under II: Towards
a More Sustainable Tourism. Dunedin: Center for Tourism, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Hall, C., Longo, A., Mitchell, R., Johnson, G. (2000), “Wine tourism in New Zealand”, In S.L. Hall C.M, Wine
Tourism around the World: Development, Management and Markets, Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp.
150-176.
Kunc, M. (2010), “Wine Tourism: A Review of the Chilean Case”, International Journal of Tourism Policy,
Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 51-61.
Marks, D. (2011), “Competitiveness and the Market for Central and Eastern European Wines: A Cultural Good
in the Global Wine Market”, Journal of wine research, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 245-263.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2011.622517
Marzo-Navarro, M., Pedraja-Iglesias, M. (2012), “Critical factors of wine tourism: incentives and barriers from
the potential tourist's perspective”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 312-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111211206196
McCole, D., Popp, D.H. (2014, September 2), Travel behaviors of wine tourists in Michigan’s Leelanau
Peninsula. Retrieved from Northern Grapes Project:
http://northerngrapesproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/2014SeptNGPnewsletter.pdf
Mitchel, R., Hall, C.M. (2006), “Wine Tourism Research: The State of Play”, Tourism Review International,
Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3727/154427206776330535
Molina, A.G.-D. Gómez, M., González-Díaz, B., Esteban A. (2015), “Market segmentation in wine tourism:
strategies for wineries and destinations in Spain”, Journal of wine research, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 192-
224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2015.1051218
Quintal, V., Thomas, B., Phau, I., Soldat, Z. (2017), “Using push-pull winescape attributes to model Australian
wine tourist segmentation”, International Journal of Wine Business Research, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp.
346-372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-01-2017-0007
Reigadinha, T., Cravidão, M. (2016), “Purchasing and Use Behaviour of the Wine Tourist on the Setúbal
Peninsula Wine Route”, In D. R.-A. Peris-Ortiz M. (Ed.), Wine and Tourism, Cham: Springer, pp.
133-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18857-7_10
Responsible Travel. (2017, February 25), Responsible Wine Tasting. Retrieved from
www.responsibletravel.com: http://experiencefingerlakes.com/culinary-wine-events/wine-and-
culinary-tours/murder-mystery-wine-tour/
Science and Technology Park for Tourism and Leisure of Catalonia. (2012), Tendencies Enotur, May-
December 2012, Issues 3 and 4. Consortium for Increasing Competitiveness in Tourism and
Leisure.

399
 Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 2018
Terziyska, I., WINE TOUR DESIGN – GLOBAL TRENDS AND LOCAL EXPRESSIONS

Sekulić, D., Mandarić, M., Milovanović, V. (2016), “Motivation of travelers for participation in wine tourism
in Serbia”. Economics of Agriculture, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 1237-1252.
https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1604237S
Shoenfeld, B. (n.d.). World's Top Wine Tours.
Retrieved from www.travelandleisure.com: http://www.travelandleisure.com/slideshows/worlds-
top-wine-tours
Terziyska, I., Kyurova, V. (2014), “Analysis of tour operator activities in Bulgaria”. Entrepreneurship, Vol. 2,
No. 1&2, pp. 74-83.
Tourism Research Australia. (2014, May), Food and Wine Tourisn in Western Australia (Summary).
Retrieved from https://www.tra.gov.au/Archive-TRA-Old-site/Research/View-all-publications/All
-Publications/food-and-wine-tourism-in-western-australia
Trend, N. (2016, May 9), 10 of the world's greatest wine tours.
Retrieved from www.telegraph.co.uk: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/tours/great-wine-tours/
UNWTO. (2016), 2nd Global Report on Gastronomy Tourism. Madrid: World Tourism Organization.

Ilinka Terziyska, PhD, Associate Professor (Corresponding Author)

South-West University “Neofit Rilski”
Department of Tourism
60 Ivan Mihaylov Str., Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
Phone:+359884941390
E-mail: [email protected]

Please cite this article as: Terziyska, I. (2018), Wine Tour Design – Global Trends and Local
Expressions, Tourism and Hospitality Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 387-400, 020404,
https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.24.2.8

Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – Share Alike 4.0 International

400