Possessive / Instrumental Cases
Possessive / Instrumental Cases
Possessive Case
The possessive case is formed for
nouns ending in -k;, -L, or -W by adding the case suffix -,Dila
all other nouns by adding the case suffix -cila.
The possessive case may also be formed by adding the suffix -,d;. It is
equivalent to -cila except that it is not typically added to pronouns.
Instrumental Case
The instrumental case is added to nouns to mean "with the use of",
"because of", or "by means of".
Instrumental Case
The instrumental case is formed by adding the suffix -My;
Examples
mtd; fj;jpahy; khk;goj;jpDila Njhiy ntl;bdhd; = "He cut
the mango's skin with a knife"
mtSila fij nra;jpj;jhspy; tUkh? = "Will her story appear
in the newspaper?"
http://www.unc.edu/~echeran/paadanool 1 1/24/2004
Thamil Paadanool, Chapter 8 by Elango Cheran
For many different forms, Thamil verbs are formed irregularly for the
inanimate mJ, mit (and nouns that could be replaced by these 2
pronouns). The following is a summary of how mJ and mit are dealt with
for verbs and cases.
Verb Endings
* There are 2 extra ways to make the past tense for mJ for class 3 verbs,
while the past tense for mit for class 3 verbs is irregular.
** Verbs which are 2 short syllables and end in -c drop the final -c
before adding -ck;
Note: the information in the chart above completes the missing information
from Lesson 3 on Verb Roots / Verb Suffixes.
Cases
From background information about Thamil cases, we saw that mit
http://www.unc.edu/~echeran/paadanool 2 1/24/2004
Thamil Paadanool, Chapter 8 by Elango Cheran
http://www.unc.edu/~echeran/paadanool 3 1/24/2004
Thamil Paadanool, Chapter 8 by Elango Cheran
have seen so far. The way the verbs are used will be different, and some
verbs have certain peculiarities.
The Verbs
Positive Verbs
Past Tense Present/ Future Tense
~ NghJk; enough
Negative Verbs
Past Tense Present/ Future Tense
Nghjtpy;iy was not
enough
NghjhJ is not/ will not be enough
http://www.unc.edu/~echeran/paadanool 4 1/24/2004
Thamil Paadanool, Chapter 8 by Elango Cheran
will not be
Kbatpy;iy was/ is not able KbahJ able
njupatpy;iy did not/ do not know njupahJ will not know
will not
Gupatpy;iy did not/ do not understand GupahJ understand
From the chart of the positive verbs, we can see that the verbs can be put
into groups:
NghJk;, Ntz;Lk;
gpb, Kb, njup, Gup
fpil, ,U
This might help in understanding the verbs.
For the positive forms of some verbs, there is a past, present, and future
tense. However, the group of verbs gpb , Kb, njup, Gup express ideas that
don't change from one moment to the next. For example, we reasonably
assume that knowledge or understanding of something is retained indefinitely.
The same idea applies to gpb and Kb. The constant action of these verbs is
a common usage of the habitual tense. Remember that the habitual tense is
expressed in Thamil by whatever the future tense is. This also applies to the
other verbs, but especially NghJk; and Ntz;Lk; and their negatives.
http://www.unc.edu/~echeran/paadanool 5 1/24/2004
Thamil Paadanool, Chapter 8 by Elango Cheran
We can't say "was enough", "wanted", or "did not want" with types of
sentences found in this lesson yet. If we use the verb Ntz;L3 in our
standard type of sentences, then we can express "wanted". We will soon get
to Negative Verbs which will allow us to say "did not want". There is no simple
verb to say "enough", however.
Examples
mtu;fSf;F ,e;j ghlk; GupAkh? = "Do they understand this
lesson?"
mtu;fSf;F mLj;j ghlq;fs; GupAk; = "They understand the next
lessons"
vdf;F me;j jpiug;glj;ij gpbf;ftpy;iy = "I did not like that
movie"
http://www.unc.edu/~echeran/paadanool 6 1/24/2004
Thamil Paadanool, Chapter 8 by Elango Cheran
http://www.unc.edu/~echeran/paadanool 7 1/24/2004