Urim Grammar
Urim Grammar
by
Pronouns:
du dual
pauc paucal
pl plural
sg singular
Inc inclusive
Exc exclusive
7
1. Introduction
Urim is a non-Austronesian language spoken in Papua New Guinea. Laycock (1973) classifies it as a
stock-level isolate of the Torricelli Phylum. It is spoken by about 3400 people, who live in 16 villages
in the southern foothills of the Torricelli Mountains. Twelve of the villages are located south of the
Sepic Highway, and one is north of the highway, in the Maprik Sub-District of East Sepik Province. The
remaining three of the villages are located west of the Bongos River in the Nuku Sub-District of the
West Sepik Province. The villages west of the Bongos River speak the Kukwo dialect, and the villages
east of the Bongos River speak the main Urim dialect (also called Yangkolen by the Kukwo people).
The Urim language has also been called Kalp, which comes from the word kalpm ‘no’ in the Kukwo
dialect.
Earlier linguistic work on Urim was done by Glasgow and Loving (1964) and D.C. Laycock (1966 and
1973). The authors entered the area in 1979 under the auspices ot the Summer Institute of Linguistics
The data for this paper were collected mainly between 1980 – 1995 in the village of Laningwap. The
data includes a corpus of about 40 spoken and written texts along with some elicited material. The team
participated in a grammar analysis seminar at the S.I.L. center in Ukarumpa in 1981. Their consultants
were Robert Bugenhagen and Robert Conrad. Pirkko Luoma participated in a second grammar analysis
seminar in 1993 and was greatly helped by her consultant Robert Bugenhagen. Paul Heinemann also
provided many valuable suggestions and helped with the formatting of the paper.
This grammar consists of three parts that have been written independently from each other. The first
part, chapters 1 to 3, was written by Pirkko Luoma with some additions by Ritva Hemmilä. Chapter 4 is
an unpublished article written by Ritva Hemmilä in 1984. Chapters 5 and 6 were written by Ritva
Hemmilä with some corrections and additions by Pirkko Luoma.
1.1.2. Consonants
Bilab LabDen Dental Alveo Postalv Retro Palatal Velar Uvular Pharyn Glottal
Plosive p t k
Nasal m n
Trill r
Tap/Flap
Fricative s h
Lateral
Fricative
Approx j
Lateral l
Approx
Ejective
Stop
Implos
1.1.3. Vowels
i u
e o
Vowel length seems to be phonemic in one-syllable words. Minimal pairs have been found between
// - // and /e/ -/e/ and /i/-/i:/. Examples: /w/ 'time', /w:/ 'tree trunk, middle part
of', /n/ 'name', /n:/ 'ridge', /hen/ 'wild sago', /he:n/ 'outside', /pir/ ‘noon’, /pi:r/ ‘to run’.
ui muikgmayen 'sister'
atne 'stay (habitually, long time); perform
muinwror 'brother'
magic'
komuin 'axe'
itna 'stand, stay'
melp kruruitn 'wasp grubs'
pal 'woven sago mat'
okipma 'food'
mai 'to gather into arms' [mhi] oi kroitnimpon 'grass sp.'
naurk 'mango' kwei poin 'yam type'
marmungkoin 'starfruit’
10
CCVC klak 'to wash' klom.pis 'numb' ung.kwan.tel 'chase him' ang.klin 'to help'
kraik 'plant sp.' klaing.kil 'shred, piece' ang.kweing.en 'insisting' am.preing 'distribute'
CCVCC plelng 'to turn' plalng.ten 'all' krirng.krurng.ket 'clattering' kwelng.kwelng 'to whine'
1 A phonetic analysis of tapon and tipon was made at Turku Univerity Phonetic Department 1984. It was found that in
irrealis form the vowel shortens so much that the vowel disappears altogether phonetically. The pitch and intensity
contours instead are similar in both words.
11
lexicalized cases like pipa /p-p/ [p’pa] 'if'. Compare the following examples: rmpa /rmp/
[rmp] 'lie', armpen /rm-en/ [rmpen] 'buy'.
Pitch and length are the main phonetic components clause and sentence intonation. Higher pitch
and lengthening of vowel mark interrogative clauses. Same features also occur at the end of tail-head
lingkages: .... kil rpma [rpma:]. Kil rpma [rpma::]...... ‘...... he stayed. He stayed and ....’.
Normally clause rhytm places the main stress to stressed syllables of words, but interrogatives and
tail-head lingkages are exceptions.
1.1.6. About Orthography
The phoneme /h/ is marginal. There are few one syllable minimal pairs that could be confusing
but usually the context helps to determine the right meaning. Therefore /h/ is not written in the
practical orthography.
<or> [o:r] ‘beat’ <or> [ho(:)r] ‘go,come in/out’
<am> [m] ‚now’ <am> [hm] ’hide’
<a> [] ‘and, REL’ <a> [h:] ‘wander’
The reduced vowel [] is handled in the orthography in two different ways: it is not symbolized
at all, or it is symbolized either with <i> or <u>.
Another area is the writing of [w(u) - u] word initially in an unstressed syllable. In the present
orthography word initial /u/ is usually written by < w >, especially if the next syllable starts with /r/
or /l/: wris /uris/ [uris wris wuris] 'one', wlikg [ulik wulik] 'spittle'. In some
cases, like wris /uris/ above, the sound is also phonemically /u/, since the word derives from ur
[ur] 'one'. Closed syllables starting with [wu] are usually written by < wu > to avoid complex
consonant sequences: wulkga 'unripe', wurpmungen 'bushy'. Word initial /wu/ is written with <wu>
is the following syllable has /u/, and <wi> if the following syllable has any other vowel.
The orthography used in this paper differs a little from Urim practical orthography in that the
marginal phoneme /h/ and palatalization after vowel /i/ are overtly indicated (hokg ‘to sleep’, angkliin
‘to help’). In the present orthography they are not indicated.
V
m ------------> mp w
n ------------> nt / ---------- + h
-------------> k y
r
These rules apply both at morpheme boundaries and across word boundaries, but there are several
restrictions and exceptions:
12
--The rule always applies between the verb (suffixed or not) and object pronominal clitics. In this
environment even the phonemes /pm/, /tn/ and /k/ and the palatalized [n] can get homorganic
clusives after them, but not always. Palatalized [n] changes [t] into [ts] as the rule 7 states.
- The rule almost always applies before nominal suffixes -is ‘attributive modifier’ and –et
‘attributive modifier’, and verbal suffix –en ‘applicative’. (Here it is not applied after palatalized
[n].)
- The rule does not apply, if the syllable before the suffix is unstressed:
ampen-et /’mpen-et/ ‘slowly’
kapring-en /’kpri-en/ ‘round up game’
-- The rule does not apply when the noun suffix -en or other enclitics (locative ai and imperative
o) are attached to the word.
wunog-en ‘openly’
tilpming-en ‘wild, untamed’
yo tukgun-en ‘fruit-bearing tree’
tree ripe-ATR
hu kitnong-en ‘rain water’
13
water sky-ATR
wang-en ‘middle one’
alung om ‘pour now!’
pour IMP.now
anong ai ‘to the village’
village remote
a-men-en ‘ours’
G-1pl-ATR
- The rule almost always applies in reduplicated words, compounds and noun complexes. The
more lexicalized and common the construction is, the more regularly the rule applies. In more loose
idioms and phrases the rule applies optionally depending on the speed of pronunciation.
p -----------> mp V
t -----------> nt / + -------------
k -----------> nk l
This rule applies over morpheme boundaries in compound words and over word boundaries in
idiomatic expressions and reduplicated phrases. In orthography inserted nasal is usually written
inside a phonological word.
Possibly there are also other restrictions, since examples of this rule are comparatively few.
Rule 3. A semivowel /w/ is usually inserted between vowels at morpheme breaks, if the second
morpheme is a one-syllabic suffix or a bound personal pronoun. The semivowel /j/ is used instead of
/w/ if the phonetic features of the preceding word make pronunciation of /w/ more difficult (for
example, if the preceding syllable has /w/ already).
When the second morpheme is a clitic, or if the rule is applied between word boundaries in rapid
speech, the inserted consonant tends to be /j/ after /i/, and /h/ if the preceding syllable has /w/ already.
Native speakers tend to write only those inserted semivowels that occur inside the phonological
word. The inserted semivowels between a bound personal pronoun and word are written but the
inserted sounds occurring between a clitic and word are not written:
When the rule is applied optionally between words in rapid speech the inserted consonant is more
often [h] than [w] or [j]. The Laningwap dialect tends to have more inserted [h] sounds, Yakrumpok
uses more the semivowel [w]. Laningwap people say that old people use more [h].
Orthographic form Phonetic form Gloss
kai are yo [kihre jo:] ‘went and cut trees’
ak ilkim [khlkim] ‘dug a hole’
rpma anong [rpm:hno] ‘stays in the village’
Ø ---------> V / C + ------------- + C
Orthographic form Phonemic form Phonetic form Gloss
wangnim /w-nim/ [wnim] ‘vine sp.’
kitn la /kitn l/ [kitnel:] ‘you say’
Kin-ling /kiin-li/ [kineli] ‘a name’
This rule applies always within a phonological word, and optionally within phrases or clauses.
1.2.2. Deletion Rules
Rule 5. If two vowels occur at word or root boundaries the second one is usually deleted.
V -----------> Ø / V + ------------ + V
Orthographic form Phonemic form Phonetic form Gloss
This rule does not apply when suffixes or clitics are attached to words. In those cases rule 3 is applied
instead.
Exceptions:
When bound pronoun is added to the verb la naki ‘tell’, first vowel is deleted:
When the habitual-continuative suffix -e is added to the four existential verbs rpma, itna, rka, and
rmpa, the first vowel is deleted instead of the second.
16
Rule 6. Morpheme-initial consonants /w/ and /h/ tend to be deleted in compound words, reduplications
and often also in phrases. When the deletion happens inside a phonological word, it is usually also
written.
a) The consonants /n/ and /tn/ are palatalized following the vowel /i/ and diphthongs /ai/, /ei/, /oi/,
/ui/. In the process the second vowel of the diphthong /i/ is lost.
b) If a morpheme starting with /t/ or /k/ follows a nasal, it loses its palatalization and the clusive
changes into an affricate or //.
This rule always applies over morpheme boundaries inside a stem, nearly always inside a compound
or phrase, and elsewhere only in rapid speech.
Rule 8. Glide strengthening. When the consonant cluster /nj/ occurs over morpheme boundaries
inside a word, the phoneme /j/ changes into /s/, /ts/, or /z/. The rule does not apply over word
boundaries.
17
n ----------> / r, l + ------------
Rule 10. In successive syllables inside a morpheme, vowels are normally ordered from open to
closed. Any sequence of vowels which contravenes this or in which the vowels are phonemically
identical, will result in the first vowel being reduced to a central vowel [∂]. Exception: The vowels /u/
and /o/ do not change except sometimes when there is a phonemically identical vowel in the other
syllable. Stress is never on the syllable with a reduced vowel. This ‘vowel disharmony’ rule always
applies inside the morpheme. Sometimes it also applies over morpheme boundaries in compounds
and in those reduplications that are clearly phonological words.
Reduced vowels in unstressed syllables tend to assimilate to the preceding full vowel or consonant
/w/ and /j/ at the beginning of that syllable.
The following words with alternative phonetic forms serve as good examples of alternative
possible orders of rules:
Orthographic form Phonetic form Gloss
elng rmpa [elndrmp:] or ‘put to lie’
[elndrmp:] or
[elkrmp:]
perngen [prken] or ‘quickly’
[prnden]
ordering 1
(the schwa-rule could be placed anywhere in the process without any change in the result)
ordering 2
optional /nm wrim/ [nmpwrim / nmwrim] nam warim ‘bit the child’ (clause)
20
1. verbs
2. nouns
3. pro-forms
4. prepositions
5. adjectives
6. quantifiers
7. adverbs
8. demonstratives
9. conjunctions
10. interjections
The remainder of this chapter will examine each of the word classes in more detail, describing
their syntactic characteristics and morphological structure.
It is typical of Urim words in all word classes, that the same phonological form may instance
multiple classes; for example functioning as a noun and a verb, or as an adjective and an adverb.
Some phonological forms exhibit even more than two word classes. In some cases one of the
functions is clearly primary and the other function(s) secondary (for example many verbs can function
as heads in noun phrases without any morphological marking to indicate a change in category). More
often it is impossible to tell which word class is primary for a phonological form; it is bi- or multi-
categorical.
Examples:
Kupm ariwe hapm angkut
1sg know.R cloth sew.R
’I know how to sew clothes’ (the verb ariwe ‘know’)
Kuina pa?
what that
’what is that?’ (demonstrative pa ‘that’)
21
2. They exhibit ablaut alternations for irrealis versus realis modality. Approximately two thirds of
the verbs exhibit this property. But all onomatopoetic and descriptive verbs and also many directional
verbs fail to exhibit this property: no irrealis forms of these verbs have been observed. One possible
reason for this might be that these types of verbs in Urim tend to occur together with other verbs (in
serial structures, etc.) rather than alone. To express modality several times in the same clause would
be unnecessary.
3. Most verbs in Urim cannot occur in noun phrases. There are exceptions; 1) bi-categorial words—
the same lexical form can function either as verb or as noun. 2) Certain verbs have been
grammaticalized into prepositions. 3) The distinction between adjectives and stative verbs is not clear
in Urim. Many stative verbs may also function as adjectives in noun phrases, with no derivational
morphology to indicate a change in syntactic category.
4. Due to the realis/irrealis distinction, verbs as group also have some phonetic characteristics. A
large percentage of verbs begin with the vowel a (realis) or i (irrealis). Most Urim words beginning
22
with the vowel /a/ are verbs. Verb roots usually consist of one or two syllables, with longer roots
being comparatively rare.
Morphologically, Urim verbs are simple in structure, not exhibiting any inflection for person or
number.2 The most important morphological category marked on verbs is a modal one. There is a
distinction of realis/irrealis mode that is indicated by the vowels i ‘irrealis’ and a ‘realis’. The
placement of these two vowels varies quite a bit depending on the canonical shape of the verb, but
usually they occur on the first syllable of the verb stem.
Aspectually, there is a habitual aspect suffix -e, and the use of reduplication of the verb stem to
express repeated or continued action. Most aspects in Urim are expressed by serial structures or
aspectual adverbs.
Two or three types of transitivity altering suffixes are also observed: 1) the transitivising suffix -
en , 2) the indirect object marker –n,which is possibly related to -en, and 3) the suffix -e which seems
to have both aspectual and transitivity changing functions. Forms homophonic with the suffixes -en
and -e are also used derivationally.
In Urim a verb stem can be simple, reduplicated, compound, or consist of a root morpheme plus a
derivational affix (sometimes more than one) (see the section 2.12.3).
2.2.1. Realis-Irrealis Mode
Ablaut involving the modal morphemes i ‘irrealis’ 3 and a ‘realis’ is exhibited by approximately
two thirds of the verb stems. These vowels usually occur on the first syllable of the verb. In many
Urim verbs the first syllable consists of this vowel only. Consider the following forms:
2 Although there is no Subject-indexing person-number inflection on the verbs, Urim does have a set of Object pronominal
enclitics, which are phonologically bound to the verb stem when they occur. These are analysed here as separate words on
the grammatical level, which fill the Object NP slot.
3 When i occurs before [w] or in a verb stem containing a following [u], then it is rounded to [u].
23
From the above forms we can see that the modal vowel usually occurs in the first syllable of the
verb. However there are some exceptions: forms 17-21 and 25-27. In these verbs the realis /irrealis
vowel occurs in the second syllable of the verb. Forms 17-21 are all locative verbs. The occurrence
of the modal vowel in the last syllable could be a feature of this verb class. Locative verbs are
exceptional in other respects as well. It is harder to say why verbs 25-27 differ from other
phonetically similar verbs 28-30. One possible explanation for all those cases is phonetic. When the
first syllable of the verb ends with a nasal or liquid, even the realis vowel a gets so reduced that the
distinction of realis/irrealis would be hard to hear. Notice that the verbs with a habitual or transitive
suffix (forms 22-24) place the realis/irrealis vowel at the beginning of the same verb-stem!
When the vowel of the second syllable is /a/, this process of reduction is even stronger - this might
explain why only some of the verbs having the consonant [] on the first syllable place the modal
vowel on the second syllable.5
4 Sequences of voiceless stop plus homorganic nasal release are interpreted as unit phonemes. The reversed sequences
of nasal plus homorganic stop are interpreted as consonant clusters. (See Luoma, 1985)
5 This data would seem to be an excellent candidate for an optimality theory approach (which assumes that languages
have multiple constraints interacting which are ranked as being more or less important, and the forms which have the least
weighty violations are the ones which actually occur).
24
Phonetically, the irrealis vowel tends to get reduced and shortened so that it practically disappears,
especially when a verb stem begins with a nasal or liquid—i.e. a [-obst] consonant—the irrealis vowel
can the consonant coalesce, yielding a syllabic consonant. In these cases irrealis i is not written in
orthography (which follows pronunciation rather than the underlying morphemic form). Irrealis i is
sometimes pronounced (and written) [u] especially if the obstruents /k/ or /p/ precede or follow it and
if the second syllable or verb stem has u-vowel: karkuk - kurkuk ‘bathe’, nakure - nukure
‘decorate’, kaluk - kuluk ‘wash’’.
2. Hypothetical Conditionals
Hu wei pipa, ake mpa kupm kai.
water rain.IR if not FUT 1sg go
‘If it rains, I won’t go.’
4. Commands
There seem to be several factors involved in the placement of the vowel, which have different rankings:
1. Avoid 3 syllable verbs (most important)
2. Avoid vowel clusters **VV
3. Avoid syllable final consonant clusters **CC
4. Avoid syllable initial consonant clusters **...CC
5. Place the vowel as near to the front of the root as possible (least important).
The forms occurring are those, which best satisfy these principles. If it is not possible to satisfy all of them, then forms
which violate the lower principles are preferred to those which violate the higher ranked ones.
25
5. Prohibitions
Kil ake mpa il hu titno pa.
3sg not FUT eat.IR water mad that
‘He must not drink alcohol’
Phonologically, reduplication is usually complete, but it can also be partial. In the following
example only the reciprocal pronoun is reduplicated (not the verb itself) to encode durative aspect:
There are also a few verbs derived from other verbs by reduplication:
ari ‘see’ ariri ‘watch’
compare to: ari-ari ‘keep on looking, stare’
Since the first part of the verb form atne already expresses duration ‘stay a long time’, the second
-e can either be a second instance of the imperfective adding a further habitual component (‘used to
stay a long time’) or a transitive suffix referring to the location of the subject or Head of RC. Here it
is interpreted as transitive suffix referring to the head NP of relative clause, which is at the same time
the locative object of the verb in RC.
Derivationally, the suffix -e is especially common in verbs expressing movement and location.
Consider the following examples:
These examples of derivational uses of -e seem to indicate that the suffix -e is used to express
both continuity/duration/habitual and alter transitivity. Adding the suffix -e to the verb stem quite
often increases its transitivity. It is often used to change semitransitive verbs to fully transitive verbs.
28
Semitransitive verbs are those verbs expressing motion or location, which have an obligatory
complement with the semantic role of goal, source or location. This second argument is
morphologically unmarked like the object of full transitive verbs (see the Chapter 4).
Conclusion:
The suffix -e is most probably imperfective (usually expressing duration) when used
inflectionally. If the suffix -e were a transitivity marker in the examples at the beginning of this
section, its function would be not to add another object to the predication, but rather to refer back to
the location where the action takes place much the same way as prepositions in the English
translation. Still, most probably the inflectional -e is a durative suffix.
When used to change the meaning of verbs this suffix has both durative and transitive functions,
often both at the same time so that the verb form has two separate meanings.
The fact that suffix -e can be occur twice on the same verb stem seems to suggest that there are
actually two homophonous suffixes with partly overlapping functions.
2.2.4. The Applicative Suffix-(e)n
When the applicative suffix –e(n) is added to an intransitive verb, it converts it into a
semitransitive or transitive predicate by promoting a peripheral argument into the clausal core as an
Object. The semantic role of the promoted argument seems to be lexically determined.
The term semitransitive refers here to situations in which the action does not highly affect the referent
of the object. Compare the following examples:
Kil hokg
3sg sleep
‘He sleeps’
Tu kin atop
3pl woman dance.R
‘The women dance’
Sometimes the alternation between V-(e)n NP and V eng NP does not seem to be correlated with any
obvious difference in the same meaning:
29
Tu kul –n -topm
3pl come-TR-1sgO
‘They come to me’
In some cases it is hard to tell whether the suffix is inflectional or derivational. Consider the
following examples:
aipur nung
bind.R firewood
‘Bind the firewood together for carrying’
ak rkwa
do.R basket
‘Make a basket’
It is possible for the imperfective suffix -e and the transitive suffix -n to occur together on a single
verb stem:
amo ‘be sick, die’ amo-we ‘be sick, paralyzed’ amo-we-n ‘be sick with
something’
angko ‘fall’ angko-we ‘drop itself’ angko-we-n ‘prepare, attack’
aye ‘‘carry’ aye-we-n ‘track game’
rpma ‘sit’ arpm-e ‘sit (long time), wear’ arpm-e-n ‘wait for, watch over
(sitting)’
rka ‘hang’ ark-e ‘bear fruit, live in, pierce’ ark-e-n ‘wait for’
ark-e-we ‘stuck with, bound by’
itna ‘stand’ atn-e ‘stay a long time’ atn-e-n ‘wait for, watch over
31
examples:
Kil amo -we -n pisak
3sg die.R-CNT-TR cold
‘He is sick with cold’
Tu angko-we -n okipma
3pl fall.R-CNT-TR food
‘They prepared food’
2.3. Nouns
Nouns are distinguished in Urim by the following properties:
1. They may function in isolation, without any further morphological marking as arguments
in a predication
2. They occur initially in the noun phrase, with all noun phrase modifiers following them.
3. They can be optionally pluralized.
Nouns are not usually derived from other words by suffixes, but compound noun stems are
common (see the Chapter 2. 12).
2.3.1. Important Semantic Classes of Nouns
Among nouns, the following semantic distinctions have significant morpho-syntactic
consequences.
1. They are questioned by a distinct interrogative word mla ‘who? Sg/Pl. Non-personal
nouns are questioned with kuina (or na) ‘what?’
2. They are optionally explicitly pluralized using the third person plural independent pronoun
tu in a noun complex construction, e.g. tu melnum ‘they person / people’, and, in addition,
they can sometimes be reduplicated. As is the case with other nouns, reduplication
indicates indefinite plurality. The kinship words man ‘mother’ and yan ‘father’ can
additionally have an plural (?) suffix -in, tu yantin ‘the fathers’ (this suffix is not
32
productive, and occurs only in few words). Non-personal nouns are overtly pluralized
either by reduplication or the use of quantifiers.
Wan wekg pa
house two that
‘The two houses’
Wan wrong-kwail
house crowd-big
‘All houses’
3. Usually only personal nouns can be referred to with pronouns. 6 An exception is the
personal pronoun kil ‘he/she’, which is also used as a deictic (see 2. 9 ‘Demonstratives’).
Potent Nouns
Potent nouns (humans, animals, machines, and natural phenomena like the wind, the sun, the
earthquake and landslide) are distinguished by their ability to occur as subjects in transitive clauses
expressing action-processes. Transitive clause subjects in Urim are usually Agents.
Takgni al -o paipm
sun eat.R-1plO bad
‘‘The sun burned us badly’
Kirmpa kil mpa am iye -wo kinar ntokg -to paipm ur ti-ke
dove 3sg FUT now carry.IR-1plO go.down make.IR-1plO bad ID D-EMP
‘(I thought) the plane will surely crash and destroy us now.’
Sometimes non-potent nouns are raised to the status of subject of transitive clause. In the
following example, the person affected is in topic position and the instrument in subject position, to
express that the action was accidental.
6 In folk tales animals are frequently treated as personal nouns, since they act so much like people.
33
(Kupm) ko angket-opm
1sg axe cut.R -1sgO
‘I accidentally cut myself with an axe’
Another means to raise an inanimate entity to the subject position of a transitive clause is to add
the verb ak ‘(use something to) do’ to the predicate. Consider the following examples:
compare to:
Kil aur kuntuk ak hipm
3sg cover pot use.R leaf
‘He covers the pot with leaves’
Ki ak ar wanyun
key use.R close.R door
‘The key closed the door’
Wripm ar wanyun
wind open.R door
‘Wind opened the door’ (potent noun as subject)
The semantic roles of the Subject in these transitive clauses are Cause or Instrument. The verb ak
in the second members of the example pairs could be interpreted as causative marker. On the other
hand, notice the use of ak as an Instrument marker in third and fourth example (see 2.5.1).
Temporal Nouns
Temporal nouns like kong ‘morning’ are distinguished by their ability to function as temporal
adverbials and their potential use as predicates in temporal clauses like the following:
Kong ise
morning PERF
’The morning came.’
Ran=o!
dawn=IMP
‘Let there be light!’ (From Genesis 1:1)
The following examples show that these words really are nouns that can function as head of a NP.
34
ak kong ti
use.R morning this
‘this morning’
ran wris-wris
dawn one-one
‘every day’
Inherently Related Nouns (Inalienable Genitives)
Urim has three types of inherently related nouns, 1) kinship terms, 2) body parts, 3) other part-
whole nouns. Kinship terms behave syntactically like other nouns, but have some structural
peculiarities. Many kinship terms are semantically plural. Some kinship terms seem to have some
kind of non-productive gender suffix: mamiin ‘grandfather’, mamikg ‘grandmother’, yalmpiin ‘son-
in-law, yalmpikg ‘daughter-in-law’.
All part-whole nouns are distinguished by their ability to occur in genitive constructions
consisting of just two juxtaposed nouns (possessor-possessed ordering), without the presence of a
genitive pronoun or an intervening genitive preposition a. Consider the following examples:
mirmping talpuk
tree sp. branch
‘branch of a mirmping tree’
mayen yilo
old.woman spine
‘the old woman’s spine’
rkim walmpopm
python blood
‘the python’s blood’
wan kimpo
house top
‘top of the house’
Compare these five examples with the following alienable genitive examples (which have
possessed-possessor ordering):
yangkipm a-kupm
talk G-1sg
‘my talk’
Part-whole relationships of inanimate entities are always expressed without a genitive marker, but
with body parts of animate entities, the genitive construction with a is quite common. It seems that
the genitive construction of juxtaposed nouns is used mainly when the possessor is referentially
generic:
35
Tukgunakg a manto ti
head G pig this
‘The head of this pig’
When a genitive construction containing a body part occurs as the Object of a transitive clause the
possessor argument can be raised to object position before the noun. This happens only when the
possessor is topic, which is usually the case (same way as with bound pronouns; see the section 2. 4.
1. 2). The raising seems to happen only when the possessed noun is a body part:
Trapuk al -opm hi
fly eat.R-1sgO sore
‘A fly eats my sore!’
When the possessor of a body part is expressed by a noun phrase (instead of pronoun), a third
person pronominal clitic -el is obligatorily attached to the noun phrase referring to the body part.7
Genitive noun phrases containing a body part do not easily occur in subject position. Instead
topicalized experiencer constructions are used. Compare the following examples:
7 Possibly this happens only with those predicates that obligatorily require the use of a bound pronoun, for example: ak
akor (el) ‘quarrel with somebody’, alk(el) ‘give to somebody’, num wakget (el) ‘have a fever’, etc.
36
anong wulom
village edge
‘the edge of the village’
2.3.2. Plurality
Two pragmatic factors seem to govern the use of the pronoun tu to mark plurality. It is not used if
the group of people referred to constitutes new information, is generic in reference, is non-topical, or
plurality is sufficiently clear from context or numerals:
37
The pronoun tu is used to mark the combination of plurality and definiteness. That is why tu is
also used with inherently plural nouns, which do not need any additional markers for plurality:
Most inherently plural nouns in Urim are kinship terms. They are usually compounds formed
from other nouns:
There are two other ways to mark plurality in nouns: the word kweikwei ‘things’ and
reduplication. The word kweikwei is used to mark the plurality of non-human nouns, usually when
the group of entities is indefinite. Reduplication can be used both with human and non-human nouns.
Also modifiers can be pluralized by reduplication - sometimes the plurality of noun phrase is
expressed only by reduplicating the modifier.
Tu alm-wrong
2pl shoot-crowd
‘They were fighting’
Some words can function either as heads or modifiers within the noun phrase, for example:
titnongket ‘strong/strength’
Wripm titnongket pa tikale wan
wind strong D break house
’The strong wind ruined the house’
titnongket a Wail-en
strength G big-ATR
‘The power of God’
There are a few (mostly personal) nouns that seem to be formed from adjectives, but probably
they are lexicalized results of ellipsis:
39
compare to:
2.4. Pro-forms
2.4.1. Pronouns (Pro-NPs)
Urim has a set of free pronouns (more properly pro-Noun phrases), a set of bound Object
pronominal clitics, and a set of genitive pronouns. In interrogative sentences, a number of different
interrogative pronouns can occur. Reciprocal action is expressed by the same pronoun for all persons
and numbers. Each of these types of pronouns will now be examined in more detail.
Independent / Free Pronouns
There are thirteen independent pronouns in Urim. These distinguish the following semantic
categories: 1) first, second, and third persons, 2) singular, dual, paucal, and plural numbers, and 3) (in
just the first person plural pronouns) whether or not the hearer is included.
From this tabulation, it can be seen that the dual forms consist of the plural form plus the numeral
(w)ekg ‘two’. The non-first person paucal forms contain the formative -teng, which does not
resemble the numeral wraur ‘three’. The first person paucal form appears to consist of the first
person plural exclusive pronoun plus a formative -to. 7 The paucal forms are used to refer to three to
six individuals. This is why the term paucal has been used rather than trial. The first person plural
inclusive form appears to be formed by adding the second person plural object clitic =epm to the first
plural exclusive form men. The short forms ekg for the dual forms and to and teng for the paucal
forms are used often after it has been made clear first to whom they refer. Ekg is also used to co-
ordinate two NPs.
7 The formative -to is strongly reminiscent of the first person plural Object clitic =o commonly found on verbs. This
clitic appears in the form -to after the consonant /n/. The formative -to in the first person paucal pronoun possibly gets its
consonant /t/ in the same way (morphophonemic rule 1).
40
It will also be noted that all singular and second person forms begin with <k>; all non-singular
third person forms begin with tu-, and all non-singular first person forms begin with m (e,i)n-.
The pronouns may occur in the following clausal slots: 1) subject (or topic in topic clauses), 2)
non-topical first object, 3) second object, and 4) object of a preposition.
Since Urim verbs do not have passive forms, the third person plural pronoun tu is used when the
Subject referent is very generic or indefinite. Indefinite reference is sometimes also expressed by zero
anaphora, if some other NP is in the topic position in the clause. Third person singular indefinite
referents are also often expressed by using the noun kamel ‘body’ (comp. old English!) at least in the
object position. The third person plural pronoun tu is also used within the noun phrase to encode
plurality of human (or at least animate) entities (see section 2. 3. 1. 1)
The third person singular person pronoun kil sometimes functions as a demonstrative pronoun
instead of the near demonstrative ti, and may in this function be attached to other singular pronouns or
nouns (see also the first example above). In this function kil can refer both to animate and inanimate
entities:
In Urim, personal pronouns may be modified by demonstratives and quantifiers. When the far
demonstrative pa occurs modifying a personal pronoun, this construction has thematic function. The
demonstrative pa is used with personal pronouns to emphasize, express contrast, and mark something
as topical. This last function of pa makes it possible that in Urim texts two persons can be referred by
personal pronouns all the way through after initial introduction, even when the actor or speaker
changes:
Personal pronouns may also occur as part of coordinated and complex noun phrases:
Following the applicative verbal suffix -n, a further inclusive versus exclusive distinction is made in
the first person plural forms:
1 =(n)tilo /-(n)=ilo/ (Inclusive)
1 =nto /-n=o/ (Exclusive)
In the form –(n)tilo /n/ surfaces in quick speech, but not in slow and careful speech.
It can be seen that the singular Object pronominal clitics and the second person plural form
resemble the free pronouns, but have undergone two changes: 1) loss of initial /k/, and 2) lowering of
the high vowels /i,u/ to /e,o/.
The Object pronominal clitics occur in the first Object slot, immediately following the verb, and
are phonologically bound to the verb. Consider the following examples:
Takgni al =o paipm
sun eat.R-1plO bad
‘The sun burned us badly’
Tu kul -n =topm
3pl come-TR-1sgO
‘They come to me.’
Uwi – n – til=o!
take.IR-TR-3sgO-1plO
‘Take it for us!’
As the examples show, there are some morphophonemic changes when the pronoun clitic is
attached to the verb. These changes follow the general morphophonemic rules explained in Chapter
1.
It is also possible for the free pronouns to occur in the Object slot. Compare the following examples:
Tu or-opm
3pl hit-1sgO
‘They hit me’
Tu or kupm ti-ke!
3sg hit 1sg this/here-EMP
‘It was me they hit!’
A bound pronominal Object is used when there is no need to highlight the pronoun for purposes
of contrast, emphasis, etc. The free pronoun is always used if any modifier co-occurs with the Object
pronoun. In the example immediately above, the demonstrative pronoun pa is used either for
emphasis or because the actor changes after this clause.
What is said here applies also when a personal pronoun is used to refer to a peripheral clausal
argument (its semantic role typically being Recipient-Benefactive or Locative-Goal) . It is promoted
to core argument in the form of bound pronoun when the referent is an already activated topic that is
simply being maintained. All uses of the bound Object pronouns are thematically unmarked ‘normal’
uses. The use of a free pronoun in this position indicates extra prominence or emphasis on the referent
(for more examples see Section 2.2.4).
The object pronominal clitics also occur as the result of a syntactic process of possessor
ascension, which lifts the possessor of an inalienable noun (usually a body part) out of the noun
phrase to serve as the Object of the verb. It is possible to have both the Object clitic and a co-
referential genitive pronoun if the possessor referent is especially emphasized or in focus, as in the
second example below:
44
Drapuk al -opm hi
fly eat.R-1sgO sore
‘A fly eats my sore!’
When the verb and body part form a lexical unit, the Object pronominal clitic is obligatory. This
might be the origin of the use of suffix -el in idioms and lexemes as adverbializer. Compare
especially the two first examples below:
al itna wam-pel
eat.R stand.R hand-3sg
‘eat while walking’
ak ikg-wam-pel
do.R look-hand-3sg
‘to steal’
ak hep-el tita
do.R first-3sg REC
‘ to compete’
la paipm-el
45
say bad-3sg
‘to ridicule’
Genitive Pronouns
The genitive pronouns exhibit the same person, number, and exclusive-inclusive distinctions as
the independent pronouns, being formed by phonologically adjoining the relative clause
complementizer a to a following independent pronoun. In essence, then, genitives in Urim are
formally a kind of minimal relative clause: pig that (is) I/mine = my pig.
In addition, one or both of the following two modifications to the pronominal forms are possible:
1) the attributive suffix -en may be added to them, and 2) an /l/ may be added between the relative
clause complementizer a and the independent pronominal form. Thus, there are four possible forms
for each genitive pronoun. 8
8 The additions of extra [n] or [p] to certain forms are probably just results of emphatic pronunciation.
46
Why the genitive pronoun sometimes takes the attributive suffix -en and sometimes not needs to
be further studied. Probably the reason is pragmatic. The form with suffix -en is more emphatic. For
example, in a text dealing with a dispute about ownership of garden lands almost all of the genitive
pronouns have suffix -en because they are emphatic—i.e. ‘mine and NOT yours’. In the forms with
-en the possessor appears to be more “attributive”, not in focus and more tied to what is possessed.9
Whereas in the form without the suffix -en the genitive pronoun is more “loose” and more like a
relative pronoun. These two constructions may occur even as alternatives in the same context:
The genitive pronoun forms containing /l/ are used when the possessor is focused information or
emphatic / in contrast to someone else. Such forms often have the meaning ‘one’s own’.
9 Here the suffix -en is very much like the attributive suffix -en that marks modifiers and forms adjectives from other
words. Also certain other modifiers of NP sometimes occur with -en, sometimes without it:
warim kin ‘girl, daughter’
child woman
When there is more than one third person participant or group of participants in the immediate
context, the genitive pronoun forms with and without /l/ are used to distinguish possessors. The
forms with /l/ usually refer to the contextually nearest revious third person possessor (usually this is
the Subject) and those without /l/ to some other third person possessor. Compare the following two
examples:
Use of the demonstrative pronoun pa also helps to identify the referent since it marks topic and
the change of topic:
With body parts, genitive pronouns are used only if it is necessary to mark the right owner. An
‘unnecessary’ use of genitive pronoun with body parts is often emphatic and can be glossed ‘own,
himself’:
Tu or tita
3pl hit REC
‘They hit/fought each other.’
48
wureren tita
near REC
‘near each other’
or-tita wail
hit-REC big
‘A big fight’
2.4.2. Interrogative Pro-forms
The interrogative words in Urim are listed below:
mla ‘who? (sg/pl)’
kuina, na ‘what?’ (kui- comes from
kwei ‘thing; yams’)
ahi10 ‘where?’
wang ahi, wangkarke, ak wang na ‘when?’
kolai [ko.la.i:] ‘how?’
ahi, (mla, kuina) ‘which one?’
eng (kui)na, eng ntei, atnen (kui)na ‘why?’
aripm ‘how many, how much?’
Interrogative words in Urim are not fronted. Instead, they occur in the same position where the
constituent being questioned normally occurs in declarative sentences. Some sentential examples of
the use of interrogative words are given below:
who?
Kitn mla (pa)? -Kupm Mowal.
2sg who (there) 1sg Mowal
‘Who are you (sg)? - I am Mowal.’
10 In the expressions ahi and kolai there is a clear syllable boundary heard between the vowels /a/ and /i/.
Intonationally, the /a/ often has a higher pitch than what precedes it and it is followed by a rise on the /i/ starting lower
than the /a/.
49
what?
Kipm warim antokg na? Men ak katnong
3pl child do.R what? 1pl.Exc do.R playing
‘What are you (pl) children doing? - We are playing.’
when?
Tu kai ak wang na?
3pl go use.R time what?
‘When did they go?’
Wang-kark-e tu kai?
time-hang-CNT 3pl go
‘When did they go?’ (compound lexeme)
(Note that the form karke only has a temporal reading, whereas the expression ak wang
na ‘when’ is more general, being used to question events, things, and times)
where?
Kil rpma kai ahi Kil rpma kai ai
3sg sit.R go where? 3sg sit.R go remote
‘Where is he? - He is over there.’
why?
Kitn or warim pa eng na
‘2sg hit child D OBL what?
eng intei
OBL why?
atnen (kui)na
because what?
‘Why did you hit the child?’
how?
Mpa kupm intokg kol-ahi
FUT 1sg do.IR like-where?
‘How shall I do it?’
50
how many?
Kitn alm manto aripm?
2sg shoot.R pig how.many?
‘How many pigs did you shoot?’
which one?
The word ahi ‘where’ is used for ‘which one?’ especially if the alternatives are there to be
seen. Otherwise mla ‘who?’ and kuina ‘what?’ are used.
2.5. Prepositions
Prepositions are defined as uninflected forms, which take a noun phrase complement and serve as
a mediating form between the noun phrase and the predicate, specifying its semantic role in the
predication. In Urim, there is only one ‘real’ preposition: eng.11 It is used to encode nearly all
oblique/peripheral arguments in the clause encoding a wide variety of semantic roles, including: 1)
Benefactive, 2) Recipient, 3) Locative Goal, 4) Purpose, 5) Reason, and 6) ‘about/concerning’. In
most cases eng appears to mark the referential domain with respect to which the predicate is true or
applicable. Perhaps this is its most basic meaning.
The form eng alternates with another, rarer form ekg. In the Kukwo dialect and in the western
villages of the Yangkolen dialect, this other form is more commonly used for these functions.
11Note that the same phonological form eng followed by a is also used to express incipience ‘about to’; e.g., Kil eng a
angko ‘He was about to fall’.
51
Eng can be used twice in the same sentence in two different meanings:
In the following example it looks like ak were used to encode purpose, but it can also be
explained as a case of double deletion (both purpose eng and repetition of NP deleted).
Kil ak rkwa
3sg do.R basket
‘She is making a basket’
Pikekg ak mining
before use.R dark
‘last night’
53
Tu kai ak wang na
3pl go use.R time what
‘When did they go?’
tu ak wail wuli
3pl use.R big arrive
‘They came in crowds’
Locative Goal Serializations
Serializations with motion verbs (kai ‘go’, kinar ‘go down’, kaino ‘go up’, no ‘come up’, nar
‘come down’) usually express the notion of goal, but may also express the notions of source, origin,
or place of action.
In the above examples the serial motion verb is necessary to define the semantic role of the NP.
When a position verb is predicate, the NP expressing Locative Goal has the status of Object in Urim
and is grammatically unmarked like the object of transitive verbs. (This is why these predicates are
called semitransitive in Urim.) With semitransitive verbs the serialization with motion verbs is used
to add extra information about the direction of the distance of the Goal in relation to the speaker.
Tu itna wring
3pl stand.R garden
‘They are in the garden.’
Coming (or other action involving movement) from a direction (without the meaning of staying
there first a longer time) is expressed without a position verb:
kil kinar ya no
3sg go-down road ascend
‘He is coming from the direction of down river’
In addition to this analytic construction expressing Source, there are a number of compound verb
stems expressing separation from some locative source which appears to begin with a bound verbal
form ang-/ing- (these forms come from the realis -irrealis forms a-i ‘be’). These are listed below:
Kil angko yo
3sg fall.from.R tree
‘He fell from a tree.’
Comitative Serializations
Serialized constructions with the verbal preposition nampokgen ‘accompany’ are used to express
comitative notions. This word is fully grammaticalized to a preposition and is not used as a verb
anymore, but has retained realis-irrealis form. Its original meaning is not known and especially the
young people do not seem to connect the different realis and irrealis forms with mode, but use them
inconsistently. There are several freely alternating or dialect dependent forms of the word:
nampokgen (IR nimpokgen) and nampikgen (IR nimpikgen) in Urim 1 sub dialect, nampon (IR
nimpon) and nampiin(en) (IR nimpiin(en)) in sub dialect 2 and in Kukwo dialect. These can be used
when the accompanying party is either human or non human.
Serialized constructions with the verb anti (IR inti) ‘agree, comply with’ are only used if the
accompanying party is human. The verb ngkaten (IR ngkiten) ‘lift up with, carry with’ is used in
constructions expressing accompaniment when the object is actually physically carried.
Additive Serializations
There are also two other serialized constructions containing the verb ak ‘do’, They are used to
express additional notions: aken ‘ to work with, add into’ (ak-en ‘do-with/TR’) and aklanti ‘in
addition to’ (ak-la-anti ‘do-say-with’):
Mpa kupm ikor yul iken /iklanti nung eng uwi hapm
FUT 1sg search.IR fish in.addition.to.R firewood OBL take.IR cloth
‘I’ll catch fish (and bring it) in addition to the firewood to exchange for clothing.’
2.6. Adjectives
Adjectives are defined as forms that can serve as either: 1) attributive modifiers of nouns within
the noun phrase, occurring immediately after the head noun and before all other modifiers, or 2) as
predicates. When adjectives occur as predicates, they never exhibit a realis-irrealis distinction. In
Urim, it is not usually possible for an adjective to occur in isolation as the head of the noun phrase,
except in elliptical contexts.
It is common in Urim for words to exhibit more than one syntactic function without any change in
form to mark the change in category, much like in English e.g. the word fish can function both as a
noun and a verb. This is especially true with the words that can function as modifiers of noun phrases
or as predicates. Very often the same word functions both as adjective and adverb in Urim without
any morphological change, for example such common words as paipm ‘bad; badly’ or wor ‘good;
well’.
2.6.1. Underived Adjectives
The class of underived adjectives in Urim is comparatively small. As in many other languages,
the basic, most common adjectives are usually morphologically simple. Semantically these basic
adjectives encode permanent properties of the entities, such as size, shape, age, or colour. Some of
the principal underived adjectives in Urim are listed below:
Form Meaning
wor ‘good’
paipm ‘bad’
wail ‘big’
wasek ‘small’
watin ‘long, tall’
tukwok ‘short’
kupuk ‘cold’
hute ‘straight’
wror ‘old’
kukula ‘light/not heavy’
59
kalkut ‘heavy’
tingklak ‘dry’
waipmun ‘black’
walim ‘brown’
tukgun ‘ripe’
maing ‘undone, uncooked’
pirpik ‘soft, rotten’
malkgu ‘soft’
Examples of attributive and predicative uses of adjectives in Urim are given below:
Pa ya hute wor
that road straight good
‘That is a good, straight road’
Note from the last example above that when an adjective is used attributively, the noun phrase
being characterized is set off from the predicative adjective by a demonstrative (pa, ti, kil, ai).
The border between verbs and adjectives in Urim is in many cases difficult to draw. Even such
basic adjectives that denote less permanent properties may occur as predicates not only in nominative
clauses (first example) but also in intransitive clauses with the imperative clitic -o. (possibly only in
special uses like incantations) and in experiential clauses that have both a topic and a Subject (last
example):
Hu ti wakget ise
water this hot PERF
‘This water is already hot/has become hot.’
Hu ti watet-o!
water this red -IMP
‘Let this water become red!’ (incantation in a divination rite)
Those adjectives that can occur in an experiental construction with an accusative object could also
be analysed as verbs.
On the other hand many stative verbs denoting state or change of state can function as attributive
modifiers within the noun phrase:
60
kupm tapor yo
1sg break.R tree
‘I broke the tree’
There are some minor syntactic differences between stative verbs and adjectives denoting non-
permanent properties. 1) The verbs expressing process or state (which can function as either
attributive modifiers in the noun phrase or as intransitive predicates) can usually also function as
transitive verbs. Pure adjectives cannot. 2) Only adjectives occur as complements of resultative
clause, that is, they require the help of some predicate when a process is described. But, as we have
seen, adjectives may occur as predicates with the completive aspect marker ise, when the attention is
focused to the actual result, not to the process itself. 3) Only adjectives occur as modifiers in noun
complexes, that is, in the animal and plant names.
13 -et has several other allomorphs: -pet, -tet, -ket, -wet (see morphophonemic rule 1.)
61
Examples:
Hunokg tapor
sea break.R
’The sea breaks’
Practically all adjectives formed by -et are transparent; the stem from which the adjective is
formed is recognizable and also occurs without the suffix. There are a few examples like watet
‘red’, lepet ‘sharp’, where the stem does not occur alone.
Adjectives derived with the attributive suffix -en14
Suffixing with -en is another important means for deriving new adjectives. This suffix can be
added to verbs, nouns, other adjectives, and adverbs.
Verb + -en ---> Adjective
Verb Meaning Adjective Meaning
titno ‘be mad, grazy titno-wen ‘crazy, ignorant’
aut ‘tie’ aut-en ‘knotty, in knots’
hum ‘break, yield’ humpen ‘loose, spread, open’
Noun + -en ---> Adjective
Noun Meaning Adjective Meaning
tungkur ‘pit, hole’ tungkur-en ‘rutty’
kuin ‘middle part’ kuin-en ‘middle’
hu ‘water’ huwen ‘watery, liquid’
kitnin ‘sugar(cane) kitnin-en ‘sweet’
kin ‘woman’ kin-en ‘married (of men)
nang ‘ridge’ nang-en ‘elevated, on the ridge’
klal ‘brightness, light’ klal-en ‘clear, bright, light in
color’
nikg ‘stomach’ nikg-en ‘always hungry’
yangkipm ‘talk’ yangkipm-en ‘talkative’
Adjective + -en ---> Adjective
Adjective Meaning Adjective Meaning
tukgun ‘ripe’ tukgun-en ‘fruit-bearing’
wuri ‘clear’ wuri-wen ‘clear’
wor ‘good’ wor-en ‘allowed, lawful’
Adverb + -en ---> Adjective
Adverb Meaning Adjective Meaning
kwa ‘up’ kwa-wen ‘early; high up (one)’
wet ‘today’s past’ wet-en ‘new’
en ‘outside’ en-en ‘outside (one)’
14 As is the case with -et, -en exhibits several different allomorphs: -en, -wen, -yen, -pen, -ten, -ken.
63
Examples:
Warim titno!
child be.crazy
’The child it crazy’
Kupm titnowen ya
1sg ignorant road/way
’I do not know the road’
Namung pa tukgun
banana D ripe
’The bananas are ripe’
anong nang-en
village ridge-ATR
‘village on the ridge’
mining kwa-wen
night up -ATR
‘early night’
melnum Maprik-en ur
person Maprik-ATR ID
‘a man from Maprik’
When added to a noun, the suffix -en usually has the meaning ‘belonging to something or
somebody’ or ‘with’. In this meaning the suffix is often more syntactic than lexical. One function of
he suffix possibly is to bind the parts of nominal phrases together:
kilpakg miring-en
fire place white man-ATR
‘a western style stove’
kiin kipman-en
woman man-ATR/with
‘both men and women
64
nimong epik-en
basket rubbish-ATR
‘a waste basket’
mining ran-en
night day-ATR/with
‘by day and night’
Note that the suffix -en is also used to mark the specifying or part-of-whole noun of a noun complex:
okmilip yipuk-en
tongue top-ATR
‘the tip of tongue’ (yipuk ‘top of something’)
yangkipm yiprokg-en
talk base -ATR
‘the meaning of talk’ (yiprokg ‘base, root; origin’)
In many cases the addition of -en to an adjective forms another lexical adjective or at least
changes the semantic meaning of the adjective slightly, but in some cases it is hard to detect what is
the semantic difference between the form with -en and the one without it. One possible explanation is
that the addition of -en emphasizes the adjective (see the similar use of -en with possessive pronouns;
Section 2. 4. 1. 3). Another explanation is that the addition of –en somehow metaphorically extends
the meaning; for example from physical bigness to a more abstract kind of bigness:
marpm wusok
money small
‘small amount of money’
marpm pa wusok-en
money D small-ATR
‘that is an easy price’
wan wail
house big
‘big house’
kwap wail-en
work big-ATR
‘a big task’
Adjectives derived with -is and -e
Some adjectives are derived by adding the suffix -is to a noun referring to the item or substance
having the property of the adjective. Only rarely does -is form adjectives from other word classes
than nouns. The suffix is not very productive anymore, which can be seen in the fact that there are a
number of cases where the bound formative of an adjective formed by -is does not occur in isolation
65
anymore. Adjectives formed by - is are far less common than adjectives formed by -et or –en, but
many of them are common lexemes.
Noun + -is ---> Adjective
Noun Meaning Adjective Meaning
wanukg ‘greens, vegetables’ wanukg-is ‘green (color)’
pung ‘plant sp.(source of yellow dye)’ pung-kis ‘yellow color’
kinipm ‘gall’ kinip-is15 ‘bitter; stingy’
hiino ‘joke’ hiino-wis ‘funny’; joking
upmukg ’mold’ upmukg-is ‘moldy’
Verb + -is ---> Adjective
Verb Meaning Adjective Meaning
kungkurung ‘(to) thunder’ kungkuru-wis ‘furious’
Examples:
Men ak hiino alm -peitn
1excl do.R joke hit.R-2sgO
’We are poking fun at you’
Por ti hiinowis, a?
story D funny or
’Isn’t this story funny!’
A handful of adjectives are observed to end in a final -e. This suffix might be related to the suffix
-e that is used with verbs to mark transitivity or continuity. The idea of continuity or permanence can
be thought to exist also between the source noun and resulting adjective in the following examples:
15 The consonant /m/ disappears for some reason; compare to kinipm-et ‘not growing a big garden’.
66
Examples:
Lam amo hut ise
lamp die.R straight PERF
’The lamp went completely out’
The adjective aklale ‘true’ has kept the realis/irrealis mode distinction:
kalkut paipm
heavy bad
‘very heavy’
kinipis maur
stingy spirit
‘awfully stingy’
Some adjectives have their own special intensifiers. For example, the word manten (< man
‘main, principal, major’) is used after the adjective wail ‘big’ to express hugeness. In the same way
the word mileng ‘very’ is used with the adjective watin ‘long’; watin mileng ‘very long’.
67
When two particular referents are compared with respect to some property, a serialized
construction containing the verb angen ‘surpass’ is used:
The forms waiketn /waikotn ‘small, a little’, or its shorter forms ketn/kotn, or the reduplicated
forms waiketnketn/waikotnkotn, ketnketn/kotnkotn are used adverbially to indicate possession of a
property to a small degree.
To indicate an even lesser degree, the sympathetic diminutive word yek ‘poor’ is placed after the
adjective wasek ‘small’. If the modified noun is non-singular in reference, part of the adjective is
repeated, waseksek, and if the word yek is used it is repeated, too:
In the case of color adjectives, and a few other adjectives, (potentially multiple), occurrences of
the attributive suffix -en serve to indicate a progressively less vivid color, or lesser property e.g.
watet ‘red’
watet-en ‘a little bit red’
klalen ‘light’
klalen-en ‘a little bit light’
klalen-en-en ‘hardly light at all’
walim ‘brown’
walim-pen-en-en ‘just a little bit brown’
(compare to the similar way that time adverbs can have reduplicated suffixes to indicate the
length of time: pikekg ‘yesterday’, pikekg-tak-ai ‘long ago’ , pikekg-tak-tak-ai ‘very long
ago’)
Finally, complete possession of a property is expressed using the adverb wrisen ‘altogether,
totally, completely; once and for all’ (wris-en ‘one-ATR’). Some adjectives require the
‘comparative’ paipm ‘bad, very’ to appear before wrisen to strengthen the property; wail paipm
wrisen ‘altogether big’. Some adjectives can have wrisen follow them with or without paipm and in
both cases it increases the degree of the property. When it occurs with paipm, the degree is even
greater. For example wor wrisen or wor paipm wrisen means ‘totally good’ (or perfect?). One way of
expressing superlative notion with the adjective wasek ‘small’ is to add the word tikris(-et) after it,
which can in turn be followed by yek ‘poor’:
Another way of expressing the superlative degree of any property is to use the locative (kai) ai
‘(go)over there’ after any of the degree adverbials:
With color terms, the word paipm ‘bad’ is used to indicate a darker shade of color. When the
word paipm is repeated in this kind of expression it does not indicate plurality but just further
strengthens the property:
In the example above, even if both books were very tiny, this construction could be used.
2.7. Adverbs
Adverbs are modifiers of constituents other than noun phrases. They take in, therefore, 1) verb
phrase modifiers, 2) sentence modifiers, 3) modifiers of adjectives, and 4) modifiers of other adverbs.
Most adverbs in Urim are single morphemes but may also be derived words or compound
constructions.
2.7.1. Temporal Adverbs
Temporal adverbs and adverbials constitute a large and important subclass in Urim. Since Urim
verbs have no tense morphology indicating time of occurrence, temporal adverbials are especially
important. The deictic temporal adverbs form a system that distinguishes several degrees of
remoteness in the future and past.
Note from the above forms in the list of deictic temporal adverbs that the system is somewhat
symmetrical around ‘now/today’. Pikekgkil ‘one day ago’ resembles the expression hikgkil ‘one
day from now’, and kwekekg ‘two days ago’ (< kwa+pikekg ‘above yesterday’) resembles the adverb
‘two days from now’ kwaikg (‘above tomorrow’).
In addition to the forms listed above the past temporal adverb pikekg can be modified in several
ways to indicate a more distant past. Some temporal adverbs (at least pikekg, kwekekg and hikg) can
also be modified by the distant deictic -ai. This makes the point of time even more indefinite:
70
Examples:
Por a nokg a pikekg hep
story G salt G past before
‘Story about how the salt was made long time ago (time of parents and grandparents)’
The temporal adverb am ‘now’ expresses concurrent time. It usually occurs after the subject
immediately before the verb, but can occasionally occur before the subject, too. If there is pake or
tike at the end of the clause, their combined meaning is emphatic and could in many cases be
translated ‘it is --- that’, ‘it is ----- who’. (There is more about the uses of am in the section 5.5.5)
Wang al –kil -en kul wreren pa, tu am wuli eng arkol nim
time G-3sg-ATR come near D 3pl now arrive OBL pull.R slit.gong
‘When its time comes close, they come now to pull the slit gong’
In addition to the deictic temporal adverbs, there are also non-deictic sequencing adverbial forms:
hep ‘first, ahead, in front of’ and katnukg ‘later, afterwards, behind’. This adverb exceptionally gets
realis-irrealis mode; irrealis form is kutnukg (In the Kukwo dialect and in western villages of the Urim
2 dialect the forms are kanukg and kunukg).
These non-deictic adverbials are possibly bi-categorial, functioning both as adverbs and verbs
(this would explain why katnukg gets realis-irrealis mode like verbs do). Consider the following
examples:
71
The most common position of occurrence for temporal adverbs and adverbials is clause/sentence
initially. When temporal adverbs occur sentence initially, they can be followed by the deictic pronoun
pa, especially when there is contrast to some other point of time or when the temporal adverb or
adverbial starts a new chapter in the text.
Sometimes the clause initial temporal adverb functions almost like a conjunction, starting a
dependent clause and marking its temporal relation to the previous clause (see also the Section 5.5.5):
Unfocused temporal adverbs usually occur following the subject and immediately before the verb.
Temporal adverbs can also occur after verb; this position is more focused.
weti?
now
‘When did he become sick, long time ago or yesterday or just now?’
2.7.2. Manner Adverbs and Frequentative Temporal Adverbs
In Urim, manner adverbs normally follow the predicate and both the direct and indirect object and
usually any eng prepositional phrases that are present (but they may occur before the eng
prepositional phrase if they are in focus). In this respect they differ from onomatopoetic and
descriptive verbs, which usually occur before the main verb (see also the section 5.4).
The class of manner adverbs is quite large in Urim. Some of them are bi-categorical, functioning
either as attributive modifiers in the noun phrase or as manner adverbs.
Also some verbs and nouns can function as adverbs without any morphological change:
Examples:
ya hute
road straight
‘the straight (right) road’
Manner adverbs are often formed from other words (verbs, nouns, adjectives, quantifiers) by
various derivational means: reduplication or suffixes -et and -en .
There are also some manner adverbs that are formally reduplicated but there is no corresponding
uneduplicated form:
Some adjectives are transformed into adverbs by addition of the suffix -el. This suffix seems to
only be used to form adverbs, whereas reduplication and the other derivational suffixes mentioned
above are also used to form adjectives and verbs (See section 2.4.1.2 for a discussion of the possible
origin of -el.).
Quite a few adverbs are lexicalized verbal constructions with realis/irrealis distinction:
Yipo tongtong!
tie.IR tightly
‘Tie it tightly’
74
Ampur la yikakatnen!
may.not speak loudly
‘Do not speak loudly!’
The frequentative temporal adverbs yongkyong ‘all the time, for a long time’, perper ‘constantly,
often’, pen (or pem) ‘again, still, first’ and lanen/lanlan ‘a long time’ also occur after the predicate
rather than before it.
itna lanen
stand.R long time
‘wait a long time’
Tu kawor hen
3pl go out/in outside
‘They went outside’
Urim has also locative nouns that function very much like locative adverbs in noun phrase and
sometimes occur in isolation like adverbs; kuin ‘middle, center; in the middle’, yamping ‘side; near,
by’, watneikgen ‘underneath’, wulom ‘edge, margin, side’ (see 2.3.1.5).
wuring kuin
garden center
‘the center/middle of the garden’
2.7.4. Negation
There are two basic negators in Urim: ake ‘not’ (for verbal clauses) and kalpis (for non-verbal
clauses) (=Kukwo dialect kalpm) ‘no’. Instead of kalpis the more injection-like a’a can also be used.
The verbal negator ake can occur either immediately before or after the subject (more usual in
texts), but if the subject is prominent and therefore fronted, then ake always occurs between it and the
verb. Ake is also used in verbless equative and descriptive clauses.
Kalpmen (more seldom kalpis) is used to negate, or actually correct, a fact in the previous statement.
Obligations are negated by ampake and akempa ‘should not, ought not’, and am(p)ur ‘don’t’. These
words always occur first in the sentence.
Ampur ak ikgwam!
don’t do.R theft
‘Do not steal!’
There are also some other means of expressing negation, e.g. the expression ‘kai ahi? ‘where’
gives a scolding meaning. There are also other roundabout ways to express negative answers (second
example):
Kai o!
go IMP
‘Go!’
Tepm kaino om
1pl.Inc go.up IMP+now
‘Let us go now!’
Permissive imperative is encoded with repeating the predicate at the beginning of the sentence:
Urim also has two modal adverbs that are used to encode probability; pilpa ‘perhaps, must be’ and
kol ‘possibly’. The word kol also has several other usages; therefore it will be described in more
detail in Section 5.6. It is commonly used in conditional or other clauses where the event or action is
less probable. It is not used when the condition is considered a fact or at least quite possible.
The modal adverb pilpa always occurs sentence initially. When it occurs after predicate, it has
the meaning ‘about, summarily’ (the third example below). Also kol usually occurs sentence
initially as modal adverb, but may also come between the subject and the verb, but has not found after
the predicate in modal meaning (see the last examples below).
Pilpa watokumplun al
perhaps insect.sp. eat.R
‘Maybe insects are biting’
Kol pikekg kil wuli pipa, kil kol am kupm ikle -wel pake
HYP past 3sg arrive C 3sg HYP now 1sg scold.IR-3sgO EMP
‘If it had happened that he arrived yesterday, I certainly would have scolded him’
kalkut paipm
heavy bad
‘very heavy’
2.7.7. Aspectual Adverbs and Other Aspectual Constructions
Urim has several means to express aspectual notions. Although aspect is not usually expressed
by verb morphology, the suffix -e, which usually encodes transitivity, seems at least with some verbs
also express continuing action. Some aspects are expressed by serial verb constructions (Section 5.4)
The serial verb constructions expressing aspect differ from other serial constructions in that the
aspect marking verb occurs after the verb it semantically modifies.. In other serial constructions the
modifying verb usually occurs before the main verb. This formal difference probably means that the
serial verbs expressing aspect have been more or less grammaticalized into adverbs.
The most important and most adverb-like of these verbs is plalng ‘be finished, over’. It is used to
express completive aspect. Plalng occurs clause finally or before clause final function words like ise,
pa or imperative o. Plalng also occurs together with conjunctions pa, pipa (or rare form pilpa),
expressing consequal happenings (after completing this, he will do that) (see the section 5.5.7). As
an aspect marker plalng can also be followed by another aspect marker ise.
There are also some other aspect marking verbs that occur in the clause final position, but they are
more clearly serial verbs and are therefore described in Section 3.3.6. ‘Serial Structures’.
The most common and important aspectual adverb is ise (ase in Kukwo dialect and western
villages of Yangkolen, ike in eastern villages of Yangkolen). This adverb always occurs clause
finally. Ise is a very common word in Urim and expresses usually that the action or process has been
completed and that the described state is valid at the time of speaking. Therefore it often can be
translated ‘already’. With process verbs ise points to the final result or goal of process. For these
reasons ise can be called a perfective marker in Urim (see Comrie). Since completed action is
usually past action, ise also expresses general past and often finality as well.
Kong ise
morning PERF
‘Morning has come’
The last example shows that ise can also be used in a clause having irrealis modality to denote
finality of action. (The word amo means either ‘be sick’ or ‘die’). Ise can also occur in clauses
having future tense; in these cases it’s meaning is less aspectual. In the following example ise
expresses intensity of the wish.
When ise occurs in a clause having the verb plalng ‘finish’ as predicate, it usually expresses that
not only the action has been completed but also some entity (food, time etc.) has been finished.
In the following examples ise also seems to express that the action or process is final or
irrevocable:
In the available data ise seems to occur only sentence finally, while the verb plalng which also
expresses completion frequently occurs connecting two clauses in the meaning ‘when that is finished,
then’ (see the section 5.5.7).
The notion ‘about to’ is expressed by the expression eng a, which occurs before the verb and the
verb is in irrealis mode. Often eng a is preceded by wreren ‘close to’. Eng a can also be used with
plalng to express that the action is about to be completed.
Manto wet wreren eng a iro kanokg ti, ari kitn ungkwan ise
pig N.Past close.to about.to break.IR ground D but 2sg chase.R PERF
‘A pig was close to break the ground but you chased it away’
2.8. Quantifiers
Quantifiers occur in the noun phrase after adjectives encoding quality and before relative clauses
(which includes genitives) and demonstratives. Quantifiers can be subdivided into: 1) numerals, and
2) non-numeric quantifiers.
2.8.1. Numerals
Urim Counting Words
The Urim counting words contain numerals and tally-directions, which are presented below with
morphemic glosses.
10 wampwam wam-wam
‘hand-hand’
11 wampwam yikak(wom) wris wam-wam yikak-(wom) wris
hand-hand leg-other one
12 wampwam yikak(wom) wekg wam-wam yikak-(wom) wekg
hand-hand leg-other two
15 (wampwam) yikakwomis wam-wam yikak-wom-mis
hand-hand leg-other-whole
16 (wampwam) yikakwomis yikakwom wris
wam-wam yikak-wom-mis yikak-wom wris
hand-hand leg-other-whole leg-other one
19 (wampwam) yikakwomis yikakwom wikgwikg
wam-wam yikak-wom-mis yikak-wom wekg-wekg
hand-hand leg-other-whole leg-other two-two
20 kamel wris
person one
21 kamel wris tuwek wris
person one plus one
25 kamel wris tuwek wampomis
person one plus hand-other-whole
26 kamel wris tuwek wampomis wampom wris
person one plus hand-other-whole hand-other one
30 kamel wris tuwek wampwam
person one plus hand-hand
37 kamel wris tuwek wampwam wampomis wampom wekg
person one plus hand-hand hand-other-whole hand-other two
40 kamel wekg
person two
50 kamel wekg tuwek wampwam
person two plus hand-hand
100 kamel wampomis
person hand-other-whole
200 kamel wampwam
person hand-hand
300 kamel wampwam alung kamel wampomis
person hand-hand over person hand-other-whole
379 kamel wampwam alung kamel wampomis kamel wraur
person hand-hand over person hand-other-whole person three
tuwek wampwam wampomis wampom wikgwikg
plus hand-hand hand-other-whole hand-other two-two
84
The three basic numerals are 1, 2 and 3. The numeral 4 is derived from the numeral 2; wikgwikg
‘two-two’ (the e-vowel of wekg has probably changed somewhere along the line into an i; the
corresponding word in Kukwo dialect is witnwetn). The first four numerals have the form 1, 2, 3,
2+2.
The Urim counting system has a modified (1, 2, 5, 20) cyclic structure, each cycle representing
the tallying of the fingers of a hand or the toes of a foot, and there is and explicit 20- or ‘person’ cycle
on the completion of tallying all the fingers and toes of a person (see Lean 1986).
Tallying with fingers and toes
All numbers can be tallied with fingers and toes and persons. Tallying begins on the little finger
on the left hand which is bent down (often with help of the right hand) and proceeds in order until the
thumb is bent down, the corresponding tally-direction is wampomis, literally ‘hand-other-whole’.
Tallying then continues by bending down the little finger of the right hand continuing in order until
the thumb is reached, thus giving the total of ten (wampwam, literally ‘hand-hand’). Sometimes upon
reaching 10, the two fists are brought together.
Tallying then proceeds to the toes so that 11 is wampwam yikak wris, literally ‘ hand-hand leg
one’. Preceding from the big toe to the little toe of the left foot in order, 15 is reached, ‘hand-hand
leg-other-whole’. One holds the left fingers on those toes tallied. Tallying continues by holding the
right fingers on the toes tallied on the right foot beginning on the big toe and preceding in order until
the little toe is reached, thus giving a total of 20, (kamel wris, literally ‘person one’).
2.8.2. Non-Numeric Quantifiers
The most important non-numeric quantifiers are listed below: Some of them are bi-categorical.
The indefinite quantifier ur is a good example of a word that exhibits several class functions. Its
most common and probably basic function is indefinite deictic ‘a, one’ (in negative clauses ‘any’ ).
When it occurs with a mass noun, its meaning is ‘some’:
il ur pen!
eat.IR some/one again
‘eat one/some more!’
akor okipma ur
find.R food some
‘find some food’
With countable nouns the combinations ur ai or ti ur are used to express indefinite amount:
Some quantifiers, especially those that encode small or large amounts of something, can be
modified by degree adverbs in the same way as adjectives (see the section 2. 6. 3 ).
Certain words that encode part-whole relationships are semantically close to quantifiers but differ
from them in that they occur after adjectives only if the adjective refers to the whole entity (not to the
part). They also can occur as the head of a noun phrase.
Examples:
tapminei umpu
rope end
‘rope’s end/ piece of rope’
marpm umpu
money remainder
‘the rest of the money’
tiwel ur misen ur
half one whole one
‘One was part only, one was whole’
misen ur tiwel
whole ID half
‘one and half’
The most common and probably basic function of ur is to mark indefiniteness ‘a, one’ (in
negative clauses ‘any’). Ur is commonly used to introduce new referents to the text, but not every
time. Ur is used in the following cases:
- when it is important to know the number of referents introduced, but the context or other
modifiers do not tell it. For this reason ur is almost always used when persons are introduced. Often
it can be glossed ‘one’ like the numeral uris, but the numeral does not have the function of
introducing new referents. Even if the numeral occurs, ur is still required to show that a new referent
is being introduced (see the first example below).
- In the following examples, the number of the referent is already clear from the context or from
the presence of a numeral, so ur only has the meaning of indefiniteness:
88
Tu kai hu kwokg ur ai
3pl go water creek ID remote
‘They will go to some creek (any one that is near)’
Wayu ur weten
taro ID new
‘a new kind of taro’
- When ur is used with an uncountable or inherently plural noun, it indicates indefinite quantity
‘some’
il ur pen!
eat.IR some/one again
‘Eat one/some more!’
Ikor okipma ur
find.IR food some
‘Find some food!’
- In questions and negative clauses ur is used meaning ‘any, anything, anyone’. In this context
the meaning is ur is very indefinite, even the existence of referent is often unsure:
Ake kupm al ur
neg 1sg eat.R ID
‘I did not eat anything.’
Ake ur la.
not one say
‘Nobody said anything/ Nobody spoke.’
Compare the following uses of ur alone and with various other quantifiers:
melnum ur ‘a stranger’
melnum ur ti ‘this unknown man’
melnum ur pa ... ‘there was a man...
melnum ur ai ‘some (unknown) men, strangers’
melnum ti ur ‘some men (from a known group)’
melnum uris ur ‘one certain man (from a known village or group)’
melnum wekg ur ‘two unknown men’
melnum manet ur ‘another unknown man’
90
2.9. Demonstratives
There are four demonstratives. Each of these can have both referential and psychological uses.
All can also be used to refer to time and as parts of pro-adverbs. The basic deictic functions of these
demonstratives are as follows:
ti ‘this, here’ indicates physical nearness to the speaker, to the hearer, or to both. It can also
indicate psychological nearness to the speaker.
pa ‘that, there’ indicates a referent that is some distance away from the speaker, the hearer, or both.
The referent is usually near enough to be seen. Pa can also signal an indefinite distance.
ai ‘far away, over there, somewhere’ is phonetically a clitic, but native speakers usually write it
separately. Ai indicates that a referent is relatively far away from both the speaker and hearer.
The referent is usually not near enough to be seen. Ai also often indicates an indefinite spatial
or temporal distance.
kil ‘3sg; this, here’ marks physical or psychological nearness and is sometimes used instead of ti
when referring to humans or animals, or when the proximity of a referent is emphasized. Kil is
basically a third person singular pronoun with its use as demonstrative pronoun being secondary
(see section 2.4).
The demonstratives pa and ti have a wide range of discourse functions. These are discussed
more thoroughly in the paper ‘Demonstrative Pronouns in Urim Discourse’ (LLM 1989). Here we
will indicate those functions only briefly. Both pa and ti are also used as conjunctions. These
functions are described later in section 5.5.6.
2.9.1. The far demonstrative pa
The word pa is by far the commonest word in Urim. In a corpus of 28,000 words, pa occurs over
3,500 times. About half of these are conjunctive uses of pa. In spoken Urim, intonation often helps
to distinguish the different functions of pa. When pa is used as conjunction, it tends to be longer and
more stressed than when it is a noun phrase constituent (see also section 5.5.6).
Because of its many functions at discourse level the purely demonstrative function of pa is
somewhat restricted in Urim. It can freely occur as independent demonstrative pronoun in most
positions, like the examples above show, but does not often occur as the subject of transitive or
intransitive clauses. The reason is probably that an independent word pa starting a clause could
easily be interpreted as a conjunction. Also it seems, that pa occurring as locative object would be
easily interpreted as emphatic particle. For this reason a deictic adverb is used instead. Compare the
following examples:
This last example was elicited. The native speaker did not accept the expression wayu pa in this
clause, possibly because the clause was not part of any context or text. When pa is used with NP, it
almost always marks givenness (refers back to something mentioned in the text or known from the
context) and the demonstrative meaning is bleached. Therefore different combinations of verb + pa
are used instead to make it clear that the speaker refers to location, not to givenness.
Kweikwei pa ak aripm?
things D do.R how.much?
92
Atom kupm la naki kil pa lala ... Atom kil lala ...
then 1sg say tell.R 3sg D talk then 3sg talk
‘Then I said to him: .... Then he said: ....’
(pa is used here to mark a topic change rather than givenness, because the personal
pronouns already indicate given referents.)
The combination ur pa has special uses introducing new topics into a discourse (see section
4.7.2.1). In some cases pa is used without ur in the same introducing function despite the fact that the
referent is being mentioned for the first time and cannot be known to the hearer. In this function both
deictic and definite meanings have become bleached and the sole function of pa is to indicate the
introduction of a topic:
The position of pa (and other demonstratives) in the noun phrase is after quantifiers and before
the indefinite pronoun ur. Exceptionally pa may occur before qualifier or quantifier. In these cases
the function of pa is to emphasize the modifier instead of whole NP:
Ti kar a ak kwap
this car G do.R work
‘This is a truck (not for passengers)’
Ti can also refer to objects not physically near, for example to mark sudden realization or strong
emotion like in the following example, where the woman has just realized that the snake killed her
husband:
Kuina kil?
what this
‘What this is?’
2.9.4. The Remote Demonstrative ai as a Pronoun and its Other
Functions
As a demonstrative ai refers to entities that are even further away than those referred to with pa
and seems in this respect to belong to the same set as ti and pa. The referent is far from both speaker
and hearer and is usually not visible. Ai functions as a modifier within the noun phrase, as a locative
adverb, and as a demonstrative pronoun.
Usually ai refers to a known and definite long distance, but it can sometimes have the meaning of
an indefinitely long distance or stretch of time:
In some cases ai refers more to the direction than to the actual location of the referent and is
therefore frequently used with verbs expressing movement. As direction marker ai can also have the
meaning ‘till, as far as’:
Kupm yangkipm kalpis. Al-kitn-en ai
1sg talk not G-2sg-ATR remote
‘I have nothing to say. Its your turn to talk.’
Syntactically ai differs from other demonstratives (ti, pa, kil) in many important ways:
1) Ai seems to occur alone only when it functions as a locative adverbial adjunct. (This is
contrary to pa which can occur alone in Subject or Object position). Sometimes it occurs as Head in
time expressions as well, but this seems to be the result of ellipsis.
Hu awe wuli ai
water rain.R come remote
‘There is rain coming over there’
96
2) Also when occurring with NP, ai usually modifies only those NPs that function as Locative
Adverbials or Locative Objects. It is also used in time adverbials. But if the NP has the role of
Subject or Object in the clause, locative marker ai usually modifies it with the help of a relative
clause. Some exceptions do occur (see the last example):
3) Ai is commonly used with time adverbials referring to the length of time while the word pa
occurs with time adverbials only as a thematic particle. The near demonstrative ti ‘this,here’ and kil
‘he,this’ instead can be used demonstratively also in time expressions.
4) Sometimes ai is used almost like a derivative suffix forming adverbials from adjectives:
97
Compare:
Kil angko watin
3sg fall.R long
‘ He grew tall’
5) The demonstrative ai does not have same thematic functions than ti and pa. It is never used to
mark topicality, emphasis or focus. Occasionally ai is used to replace pa as mark of anaphoric
reference if the speaker wants to refer to the distance or direction of the referent.
Sometimes ai is used as an alternative for pa to mark general remoteness in contrast with the
near demonstrative ti. This happens because in certain contexts pa would be always interpreted as a
discourse marker. For example when pa occurs after the indefinite quantifier ur, the combination ur
pa indicates the introduction of a new topic to the discourse.
When occurring together with indefinite pronoun ur, ai usually also has the meaning of
indefiniteness; it refers either to indefinite amount or to the indefiniteness of the referent itself.
Consider the following examples:
Mla ur ai kul
who ID remote came
‘Whoever came’
melnum ur ai
man ID remote
‘somebody / an unknown man’
compare to:
melnum ur pa
man ID that
‘This certain man’ (introducing a new participant)
Ai is used as far demonstrative instead of pa also with locative words like hen ‘inside’ or wompel
‘other side’. For example, the expression wan wunen pa could easily be interpreted as ‘in the
mentioned house’ or ‘inside the house’ (as contrast to outside) in discourse context:
Wan wunen ti
house inside this
‘Inside this house’
Wan wunen ai
house inside remote
‘Inside that house’
Notice that in the last example ai and ti are clearly in contrast and the referent marked with ai is
not very distant spatially from that marked with ti.
Phonologically ai behaves like other clitics; it is pronounced together with previous word and is
usually unstressed. Native speakers generally write it as an independent word same way as other
clitics.
99
Another possible connection exists between ai and the interrogative pronoun ahi. The phonetic
form of the interrogative pronoun can be derived from the word ai by adding rising question
intonation. As the result of rising intonation the second vowel /i/ lengthens. After that the word is re-
syllabified and /h/ is added between the vowels to mark the syllable break. Notice, that also the
demonstrative pronoun ai tends to have indefinite meaning.
Often the serialized verb is added just to give more information about the location of referent like
in the following example:
Yo kinar ai trum
tree go.down remote kapok
‘The tree down there is kapok’
100
In other cases the serialized construction is used because plain demonstrative adverb could
potentially be misinterpreted as a topic or emphatic marker. This is particularly the case with pa:
There is also a more lexicalized construction ha-pa /ha-ti which is usually pronounced as one
word. It is used only when introducing new non-topical referents into the text, usually inanimate
instruments or objects. Its function is to show that the instrument or object was already at hand or
near by when the action started.
Singular Plural
Coordinating conjunctions:
102
... plalng, .... plalng pa, ... plalng pipa ‘after that, (when that had happened or finished)’
....titan, ....ninan ‘after that (a longer happening or action
finished)
am ‘now, then’ (immediately) (basically time word
‘now’)
atom ‘then, and’
Subordinating conjunctions:
- causative and conditional:
pa ‘when’
... pa, ‘when, if’
pipa ‘if’ (combination of pa +pa ---> pipa)
.... pipa,/pilpa, ‘when’, if
pati ‘so then’ (combination of pa +ti- ‘this’ --> pati)
....pati ‘what comes to that’
(kolpa) atom ‘so, therefore (often past)’
(kolpa) ti ‘this is why, therefore (often future)’
kolpa ‘therefore, being like that, like that (before quotation)’ (combination of kol ‘like’ +
pa
‘that’)
- hypothetical:
- expressing reason:
eng ‘so that, therefore’ (also preposition: Benefactive, Goal, Purpose etc.)
eng ntei ‘therefore’ (originally interrogative pronoun ‘why?’)
103
atnen ‘therefore, because of’ (also preposition and verb ‘wait for, watch)
- semantically neutral:
As is the case in many other languages, in Urim a number of the conjunctions appear to be built
out of demonstratives. The commonest conjunction in Urim, pa, is a near demonstrative ‘that’. This
demonstrative occurs also as part of conjunctions pake, pipa, pilpa, kolpa and pati. Three
conjunctions, kol, eng, and atnen a transparently related to prepositions. As well as taking nominal
complements, eng and atnen can also govern a clausal complement. Atnen is probably originally a
verb (there is a verb atnen ‘wait for, watch; hit). The conjunction ari ‘but’ is phonetically similar to
the verb ari ‘see’, but it is not clear whether or not this is an accidental resemblance. The verbs la
‘see’ and plalng ‘finish’ function as conjunctive forms too. The function of plalng as conjunction
resembles tail-head linkage which connects full sentences. Very much like conjunctions function the
words titan and nanan and reduplicated verb marking continuity. These words and reduplication
occur (often together) between clauses to show that the action described in the first clause continues
until the action of second clause starts. This structure and tail-head linkage are described in Chapters
5.5.7 and 5.7. Other conjunctions are described more fully in the Chapter 5. 5.
Examples of conjunctions:
When the conjunction pa is placed before the pause, its meaning is often intensified (more
emphatic or causative meaning added):
More rarely the conjunction in Urim may also occur inside the clause. In most cases the position
of conjunction in the middle of clause can be explained thematically. Fronting of object can move it
even to the front of conjunctions. This may be a feature of spoken language only.
Amti ake kitn wor pipa hikgkil, kitn kaino iri Nik
not not 2sg well if tomorrow 2sg go.up see.IR Nik
2.11.Interjections
The most common interjections in Urim are listed below:
O’o! negation
la (similar to verb la ‘say’) starts an impatient command
(P)apm ‘Be quiet!’
Oe! ‘It’s a lie!’ or expression of joy
kukuk! hunter or warrior shouts when the arrow hits the target (pig, cassowary,
person)
uwouwo call to all to come (after killing a pig)
Examples:
Wui! Mla ari kupm ti?
ITJ who see.R 1sg here
‘Oh! Who saw me? (since magic does not work anymore)’
2.12.Compounding
2.12.1. The Problem of Word Boundaries in Urim
In Urim there are some difficulties in determining whether a construction is a compound word or
a phrase. Phonological criteria alone are not sufficient, because a grammatical phrase may
phonologically be one word, especially idioms. On the other hand, the boundaries of a phonological
word are not very clear in Urim. Many morphophonemic rules can be applied over a larger domain,
some apply over a more restricted domain than phonological word. Here we will briefly consider
various rules and other boundary marks that help to determine word boundaries in Urim.
a) Stress
Stress is the clearest mark of a phonological word in Urim. A phonological word can have only one
main stress in Urim, as indicated in the following examples:
107
‘kol#ti ‘only’
like-this
‘yankipm#ok ‘talk’
talk-mouth
However, stress is not very reliable in determining whether or not the construct is grammatically
one word, because two nouns or two verbs can be joined phonologically under one stress when no
modifiers occur in between:
‘wan#yun ‘door’
house-door
compare to:
These constructions could easily be interpreted as compounds, if it was not known that another
word could be inserted. The expressions are phonologically words but grammatically phrases.
108
b) Morphophonemic rules.
Many morphophonemic rules apply over word boundaries both in compound words and in
phrases. Those rules that apply only inside a word, actually are often restricted to the stem or to the
stem with suffixes, and do not apply between words in compound construction.
- Rule 10 (the rule that converts any vowel that is not followed by a more close vowel to a schwa)
operates almost exclusively inside the morpheme, not inside the phonological word. It can be applied
also to words derived by reduplication, but usually only when these words are so lexicalized that the
parts are not recognizable and do not occur alone anymore. In most words formed by reduplication
this rule is not applied, even if the constructions are clearly words phonologically, lexically and
grammatically:
Rule 10 applied:
milmal [m∂l’ml] ‘thunder’
kirkar [k∂r’kr] ‘shout’
pipa [p∂’p:] ‘if’
- Rule 7a (palatalization) usually operates only inside the phonological word. It is applied when a
suffix is added to the word or between the parts of a compound or phrase, but not over word
boundaries except sometimes in rapid speech.
but:
tu ari nep wekg
3pl see.R coconut two
’They saw two coconuts’
‘bring it up here’
- Rule 8 marks the boundaries of grammatical word quite clearly since it is not applied unless the
two words under a single intonation contour form a compound:
compare:
wan wail yun ‘the door of a big house’
house big door
There are also restrictions in the consonant clusters that occur word/morpheme initially or finally,
compared to the clusters allowed morpheme medially. Inside reduplicated and compound words, a
much larger set of clusters is allowed than inside morphemes.
mel-num ‘person’
body-skin
muikg-muin ‘siblings’
sister-brother
small big
1. Verb-Verb
2. Verb-Noun
3. Verb-Adv
4. Noun-Verb
5. Verb-Noun-Verb?
6. Verb-Adj-Verb?
7. Verb-Noun-Noun
Compound verbs are either verb-verb or (most of them) noun-verb combinations. The auxiliary
verb ak ‘do’ can be added to these types, which makes the combinations verb-verb-verb or verb-noun-
verb. Other types of compound verbs are rare. The maximum number of roots observed in a
compound verb stem is three.
do inside steer
ak won alm-en ---> akwonalmpen ‘think’
do insides shoot-TR
arm won-el ------> armponel ‘flatter’
sow inside-3sg
ik atn-e-n ------> ikatnen ‘stare’
spear stand-CNT-TR
ok la-la oklala ‘talk’
mouth say-say
In Urim compound verbs are quite common, but it is not always easy to tell whether two verbs
form a serial structure or a compound verb stem. Consider the following examples that show how a
verb phrase which is phonologically one word, can be grammatically a phrase (as we saw with nouns
in the section 1.5.1):
Some idiomatic verb phrases containing ak are pronounced as two phonological words with more
than one main stress, others as one phonological phrase with one main stress. In both cases the
phrasal idiom is a single lexeme with a single, non-compositional meaning. No objects or other
constituents can be placed in between the parts of these idioms:
Compounding with the verb ak ‘(use something to) do’ is a common means of expressing
causativity in Urim. Consider the following examples, which are phonologically one word but can be
interpreted as either lexemes or grammatical structures:
Urim also has compound adjectives and adverbs, although they are much less common than
compound nouns. Almost all numerals are formally compounds or complex phrases. Many personal
pronouns, especially dual and paucal forms are compounds. All this shows that compounding is a
very productive means of forming words in Urim.
Compound Adjectives
Compound Numerals
wam wam ------> wampwam ‘ten’
hand hand
Compound Pronouns
men wekg ------> mentekg ‘we two’
1pl two
Usually the parts of reduplicated word retain their meaning but in the more lexicalized
reduplications the meaning of parts tend to be partly bleached. For example the word kweikwei comes
from the word kwei ‘yam type’. This is the most important tuber variety grown in the area and
therefore the reduplicated form means generally ‘food’. The words kwei and kweikwei also have a
more general meaning: ‘something, anything’. The reduplicated form kweikwei is also used as a
general plural marker modifying noun phrases. Some lexemes have the form of partial reduplication
but no corresponding unreduplicated form occurs: tukuk ‘sorcery’; walelel ‘cicada’. In Urim most
onomatopoetic words are reduplicated in form. The parts of these words usually have no independent
meaning; warwar ‘shake’.
Also whole phrases can be repeated fully or partially. Some of these tend to be written as one
word too:
akwonalmpen-almpen watipmen
think.R –think.R plenty
‘ponder it, doubt it’ (lit: keep thinking a lot)
2.13.2. The Functions of Reduplication
Reduplication has many functions in Urim. It is a common means of forming new words.
Repetition and reduplication both also encode plurality, intensity and several verbal aspects.
116
Examples of adverbs:
yongkyong ‘for ever’
hirir ‘similar; close’
ariworwor ‘very well’ ari ‘see’, wor ‘good’
Tu wrong-wail-en wrong-wail-en
3pl crowd -big-ATR crowd-big-ATR
‘a lot of people, crowds of people’
The suffix -en with adjectives lessens the property of the adjective the more it is repeated (see
section 4.5.3 ‘Comparison of Adjectives’):
In the same way, the partial repetition of a temporal adverb can be used to express increased
length of time:
Also the words paipm and wor that are used as increased degree with adjectives, can be
reduplicated to strengthen the degree even more:
watet paipm-paipm
red bad-bad
‘very dark red’
Repetition Encoding Plurality
One way of encoding plurality is to repeat the noun. This usually encodes indefinite amount of
referents. (see 3.3.2) Often the modifiers of NP—adjectives, adverbs, or numerals—can be repeated
instead of the Head noun. Sometimes even the verb can be repeated to encode the plurality of one of
its arguments (subject or object). In this case it usually encodes distributive aspect at the same time
(see also 2.13.2.4). Repetitions encoding plurality are only seldom written as one word.
Verbs:
Tu wrong-wail pa wuli wuli eng howen nim.
3pl crowd-big D arrive arrive OBL beat drum
‘The people kept coming to the dance ceremony.’
118
Nouns:
Tu warim warim ikga iri kul
3pl child child F.Fut see.IR come
‘The children will see it later’
Adjectives:
In the following examples the repetition of an adjective marks the plurality of the whole NP.
In the last example the word paipm ‘bad’ serves as intensifier of the adjective watinet ‘long’, and
the reduplication of paipm encodes the plurality of the whole NP.
Noun complexes
119
In the case of noun complexes, only one of the constituents needs to be repeated or reduplicated to
mark the plurality of the whole complex. Usually it is the second noun serving as modifier that is
reduplicated (This second noun usually expresses a part of the head noun or further specifies the
referent):
In this example the repetition/reduplication has a special function: it refers more to repeated action
than to the plurality of the whole noun phrase itself. In the situation the actor takes something from a
plural entity of things one by one. These examples do not indicate whether the actor handles (picks or
cuts) all the greens; some might be left.
Reduplication Encoding Verbal Aspect
Some verbs are formed of repeated roots, which do not occur by themselves or occur in a changed
form. Usually these verbs describe happenings or actions that are repetitive in nature or
onomatopoetic:
Habitual:
Kupm ake al al waring pa.
1sg not eat.R eat.R betel nut D
‘I do not chew betel nut’ (can also be written al-al)
Kil ak ak ikg-wamp-el
3sg do.R do.R look-hand-3sgO
‘She used to steal’
120
Repetitive:
Kitn atning atning pa!
2sg hear.R hear.R EMP
‘You have heard it many times!’
Repetition of a verb can also encode distributive aspect when the subject or object of the verb is
plural:
Kipm ungkwan kopi man talpuk a pikekg elng itna itna pa.
2pl remove.R coffee mother branch G past put stand.R stand.R D
‘Take away the main coffee branches that you had left there before.’
In these examples, the noun phrase in subject position already contains overt plurality marking, so
that repetition of the verb is not needed to indicate plurality of the referent. In the first example the
action affects the objects one by one, in the second example the people arrived to the singsing-feast in
small groups one after another.
Durative aspect is often expressed by repeating the verb more than once:
Especially in narrative texts several times repeated verbs often occur between two clauses to
express that the action or happening continues for a long time before something else happens.
1. Inalienable Genitive
2. Head (This may be either a single noun or a sequence of nouns occurring as a noun
complex. See below for further discussion.)
3. Attributive Modifiers (Multiple occurrences of these are possible. When this happens, they
occur in the order: Colour > Size > Quality.)
4. Quantifiers (Multiple occurrences possible)
5. Alienable Genitives
6. Relative Clauses
7. Demonstratives
Almost all modifiers can co-occur. Exceptions to this are: 1) alienable genitives do not co-occur
with inalienable genitives, and 2) alienable or inalienable genitives do not co-occur with relative
clauses. There are examples of two relative clauses modifying a Head noun.
A number of examples of Urim noun phrases will now be given which illustrate the above
ordering of noun phrase constituents.
HEAD (NOUN) RC RC
Kopi a watinet paipm paipm a now-en anel pipa kipm ik kol kil
koffee REL long bad bad REL go.up-TR pick.R if 2pl do:IR like this
‘In the case the coffee is so very tall that you need to climb to pick [it], you should do like
this.’
The emphatic adverbs/particles ata ‘only’ and yat ‘also’ usually occur after other modifiers in the
noun phrase.
There are some exceptions to the order of constituents in the noun phrase given above. Often
these exceptions are textually motivated. When the speaker wants to stress a qualifier, quantifier, or
genitive pronoun, the emphasized element is extracted to the end of the phrase:
124
Possibly this structure should be analysed as some kind of appositional structure, not a coherent
noun phrase.
With relative clauses, the position of demonstrative pronouns varies; sometimes it occurs after the
relative clause, sometimes before it:
In the following example, the demonstrative pronoun occurring after the relative clause clearly
refers to a noun inside the relative clause, not to the head noun:
complexes. Common types of noun complexes are: 1) the sequence of pronoun + noun, and 2) the
sequence of a generic noun followed by a one or more specific noun(s).
1) Sequences of pronoun + noun are usually plural. The sequence of third plural pronoun plus
following noun is a common means of overtly indicating plurality.
men melnum
1pl.Exc person
‘we people’
tu melnum
3pl person
‘the people’
tu Ayum
3pl Ayum
‘the people of Ayum’
Sequences of a singular pronoun + noun also occur. Appositions are normally separated from the
main clause by a pause. Only the last example below has a clear pause between the pronoun and
appositional NP:
Other means of expressing plurality are reduplication and the word kweikwei ‘things’. These
form structures that are formally noun complexes:
2) Sequences of generic noun + specific noun are usually phonologically two words with two
separate main stress. The second noun functions as modifier, helping to further specify the identify
the referent:
yo kimping
tree sp.
‘tree species’
hu kop
water lake
‘lake’
wel kuliin
bird bird.sp.
‘kuliin-bird’
wakg kuntuk
fire pot
‘cooking fire’
The specifying part of noun complex may be also a name, or a combination of two words:
nung kampong
wood tree.sp.
‘wood of kampong-tree’
Resemblance of some co-ordinated noun phrases to noun complexes
Since sequences of co-ordinated nouns can occur both with and without a coordinating
conjunction, the coordinated sequences without a conjunction formally resemble a noun complex.
However in co-ordinate noun phrases, unlike noun phrases, no noun is semantically modifying
another noun; both nouns have equivalent syntactic status.
There is a slight phonological difference between a coordinate sequence of nouns and a noun
complex. In the case of noun complex, main stress tends to fall on the second noun. Coordinated
nouns are stressed equally.
wuring timping
garden old.garden
‘gardens (new and old garden)’
(an almost lexicalized noun phrase)
There are more examples of coordinated phrases below and in the section 3.5.
How Noun Complexes differ from Apposition, Coordinative Noun Phrases,
Compound Nouns and Inalienable Genitive Constructions
Phonologically, the sequences of nouns in noun complex usually are separate words but the
difference between these structures and compounds is not always clear. The noun complexes
consisting of pronoun and noun are clearly two phonological words as well as the animal and plant
names. Other specifying noun+noun combinations and kinship terms tend to be pronounced as one
phonological word with one main stress, and can be termed compounds. The borderline between
compounds and phrases is a continuum.
Semantically, the noun complex is relatively transparent, with each of the subsequent nouns
functioning attributively to restrict the reference of the head noun. Here they differ clearly from
coordinated phrases where none of the parts functions as a modifier of another. Coordinated nouns
always exhibit separate intonational contours, while in noun complex one noun (almost always the
second one) usually has the main stress. Sequences of coordinated nouns can function as a complex
head of a noun phrase and as a unit be modified by other NP modifiers:
Coordinated noun phrases tend to get lexicalized and be pronounced as one phonological word.
Compare the following examples:
The most important difference between a noun complex and an appositional noun phrase is that
the parts of noun complexes are not interruptible by other noun phrase modifiers. This is in contrast
to true apposition, in which the appositional noun phrase occurs after the full noun phrase, and
therefore there can be multiple modifiers intervening between the head noun of the noun phrase and
the head noun of the appositional noun phrase. Consider the following examples:
Inalienable genitive constructions and noun complexes are similar formally and phonologically,
but differ in that the initial noun phrase functions as a genitive modifier of the following noun rather
than the following noun functioning as a modifier of the initial noun. Also, the genitive noun phrase
itself can contain modifiers, whereas the head noun in a noun complex would not have any modifiers:
hu paipm wail ur
water bad big ID
‘A big bad pond’
compare to:
hu wail paipm ur
water big bad ID
’a very big pond’
The exact order of quantifiers in the noun phrase has not been investigated enough yet. Usually
numerals occur after non-numeric quantifiers. The indefinite ur ‘a, one’ can be classified either as
quantifier or deictic; in the noun phrase it occurs between these two constituents.
In Urim names are always introduced appositionally, even when the word nang ‘name’ is present.
They are never introduced using relative clauses or genitive phrases:
Instrumental relative clauses have the form [a [ak [Ø Verb…]]], where the instrument functions as
the Subject of a clause embedded under the verb ak ‘do, cause’. Instrumental relative clauses are often
used when speaking about new things for which the language does not yet have a word.
It is rare but possible for the relative noun to function as a genitive in the relative clause. Unlike
the preceding examples, the relative noun does receive overt expression, being encoded as a genitive
pronoun.
Am melnum a pikekgkil tu akikgwampel karek a -kil-en am pake.
now person REL yesterday 3pl steal.R hen G-3sg-ATR now D.EMP
‘He is the person whose hen was stolen yesterday.’ (=’He is the person that they stole his
hen yesterday.’)
When the relative noun has the role of Locative within the relative clause, the verb in the relative
clause sometimes gets the suffix -e added to it. The principal function of this suffix is to express
continuity or habituality and can therefore only be used when the relative clause is semantically
compatible with it. In relative clauses, the suffix helps to disambiguate the relative clause from a
chained clause.
…atom kitn lang kawor ampei ur a tawong pa kul hor itna pa.
then 2sg slip enter rope ID REL hole D come come.out stand:R D
‘…then plug it into the cord where there is a hole at the end of it.’
Locative relative clauses are often used to express new concepts for which a lexeme is lacking in
the same way as instrumental relative clauses.
Wrik a arpm-e
place REL sit.R-CNT
‘Chair (place that one sits)’
The relative noun can also function as a temporal adverbial within the relative clause.
In the next two examples the use of relative clauses with a in association with particular head
nouns encode adverbial reason and manner adjuncts
Sometimes the relative pronoun can be left out, especially when the relative clause has a time
word that clearly shows that the relative clause does not refer to the present time of the story.
Men awi wrikya pa aye kawor itni wan mpa mentekg hokg
1pl.Exc take.R cargo D carry.R enter stand.IR house FUT 1dual sleep
pa.
D
‘We took our cargo to the house where we would be sleeping.’
135
Urim also has one special type of relative clause where the relative marker never occurs. This is
the combination of existential verb (usually ha) and a demonstrative pronoun which functions as a
pro-adverb specifying where the referent of head noun is located. The use of this rather lexicalised
expression is approximately like the use of the so-called ‘deictic relative clause’ in English (Hawkins
1987:136)
In the following example pa occurring after relative clause clearly modifies a noun inside the RC,
not the head noun.
In the following examples the demonstrative pronoun occurring after the RC must refer to the
Head NP since no other possible NPs are present. Possibly the demonstrative occurring in this
position also functions demarcatively, separating the long relative clause from the rest of the sentence.
Atopen a kweikwei wrongkwail wet a kupm angkleikg hep nak -epm pa,
joy G things all.of.them just REL 1sg list.R first tell.R-2pl D
pa ake atopen aklale wrisen a Maur Wor ikga itni yongyong pa, kalpis.
that NEGjoy true honest G spirit good FUT stay.IR for.ever D not
‘The joy about all the things I just listed to you, that is not the true happiness of Holy
Spirit that will last forever, not indeed.’
Genitives Expressed by Relative Clauses
In Urim genitives and relatives have the same form. Both are formed by using a. The difference
between genitives and relatives has to do with the nature of the Complement of a. In relative clauses,
a takes a sentential Complement, while in genitive constructions it takes a noun phrase Complement.
The genitive really expresses the fact that one noun is subordinate, and modifier of, to another
(Shopen 1987 III, p. 185). Therefore the marker a can be called a general subordinate marker which
marks both modifying nouns and full clauses. On the other hand, genitives in Urim could be viewed
as a kind of minimal relative clause whose predicate consists only of a noun. Recall also that the
genitive pronouns are formed using a (cf. a-kupm ‘mine’/’that [is to] me).
137
kanokg a ninol
ground REL mushroom
‘ground where mushrooms are growing’
warim a kiin
child REL woman
‘woman’s child’ How would ’the child that is a woman’ be different???
wang a hokg
time REL sleep
‘time to sleep’
yiprokg a wakg
roots REL fire
‘the origin of fire’
In Urim the use of this type of genitive construction has some restrictions. Inalienable genitive
constructions usually formally resemble noun complexes, since they lack an overt genitive marker
(see section 5. 1. 2. 1). The same applies to genitive constructions introducing the name of a person
or place. If the head of an inalienable genitive construction is animate, occurrence of a is possible,
but topic constructions are usually preferred instead (the first example below):
Not even the presence or absence of verb always makes clear difference between a genitive
structure and a relative clause. In the following examples an embedded clause occurs modifying a
noun; in this respect they look like relative clauses. Nevertheless, there is no noun in the embedded
clause (not even an underlying one) that could be co-referential with the head noun.
nang a nar hu
name REL descend water
‘a name given in baptism’
wuring timping
garden old.garden
‘gardens (new and old garden)’
There are more examples of coordinated phrases below and in section 5.1.2.
wor wrisen
good indeed
‘Excellent’
pikekg ai
past remote
‘sometimes earlier’
mehen mehen
easy easy
‘carefully’
3.2.2. Numeral Phrases
Most numerals in Urim are formally coordinate phrases, which have the structure:
Other kinds of numeral phrases are rare. Demonstratives and a few adverbials occur as modifiers
in these phrases:
140
wris yat
one also
‘One also’
Tu ti ur
3pl this ID
‘some (unknown) people’
Tu ur ai alm ise
3pl ID remote shoot.R PERF
‘Some strangers shot (them)’
Personal pronouns may also occur as part of coordinated noun phrases, either with another pronoun or
with a noun:
Personal pronouns can also sometimes be modified by genitives or relative clauses, especially the
3rd person plural pronoun tu ‘they’.
tu a ikgalen kweikwei
3pl REL look.after.R things
‘Those who take care of things’
Mla ur ai kul...
who ID remote come
‘Whoever came..’
The near demonstrative ti ‘this’ can sometimes occur as head of pronoun phrase.
Hapm ti ur hu -wet
cloth this ID water-ATR
‘Some clothes are wet’
3.2.4. Prepositional Phrases
In Urim prepositional phrases are very common and consist of a preposition plus its following
noun phrase Complement [P [NP] ]:
kiin a kipman
woman and man
‘women and men’
wanukg a nimun
greens and pitpit
‘greens and pitpit’
wring timping
new.garden old.garden
‘gardens’ (almost lexicalized idiom)
man -yan
mother-father
‘parents’
wusok-wail
small -big
‘brothers, sisters (of same sex)’
two’ is usually reduced into (w)ekg ‘ two’. This pronoun can occur before, between, or after the two
NPs. When the connecting pronoun occurs before, the structure looks more like an appositional
construction :
Mentekg Karis
1dual Karis
‘I and Karis’
Accompaniment linking
The verbs nampokgen ‘together with’ and anti ‘with’ are used when coordinative relation
between NPs has the additive meaning of accompaniment. These words could perhaps also be
interpreted as prepositions, especially since nampokgen does not occur as predicate. Both still exhibit
an irrealis form. Anti seems to occur only with human NPs, nampokgen can occur also with non-
human NPs although it normally is used about humans. These conjunctions never occur between
clauses.
tiur yat a aye wrikya a Pirkko ekg Debi pa, men kinar..
some also REL carry.R things G Pirkko two Debi D 1pl.Exc go.down
‘Pirkko and Debi together with us two, me and Josech, and also accompanied by some
people who carried Pirkko’s and Debi’s things, we went down...’
Some phrases are formed by adding the suffix –en to the modifier. The function of this suffix is
to mark the construction as a phrase, and it also has the semantical meaning ‘with’ (see also section
4.5.2.2). These phrases often function as adverbials in the sentence :
Kiin kipman-en
woman man-with
‘both men and women’
Ake wrik watipmen itna kar ti. Kitn aki kil ai kai.
NEG place plenty stay.R car this 2sg or 3sg remote go
146
‘There is not much space in this car. Only you or he can go.’
Also non-verbal equative and descriptive clauses are negated with the word ake. Existence
clauses and verbless possessive clauses instead are negated using the word kalpis(en):
147
Obligations are negated by ampake’should not’, akentiwe ‘cannot’, and am(p)ur ‘don’t’. Also the
combination ake mpa is often used in negative exhortations. All these occur first in the clause.
Akentive can be interpreted as a idiomatized phrase (ake antive ‘not enough/able’). All these
expressions are more like clause adverbs than parts of verb phrase.
Ampur hakg!
don’t cry
Don’t cry!’
Also the temporal adverbs am ‘now’, mpa ‘in future’, and ikga ‘later in future’ are more closely
attached to the verb. Some of them can function also as conjunctions: see Section 5.5.5.
Wrekg o!
rise IMP
’Get up!’
Ikor nung o!
search.IR wood IMP
‘Get firewood!’
Hu ti watet o!
water this red IMP
’Let this water be red!’ (incantation)
Mehen o!
carefully IMP
’Be carefull!’ (notice that mehen is an adverb!)
As the examples above show, in imperative clauses the subject may or may not appear on the
surface. Reason is pragmatical, since Urim verbs do not encode person or plurality.
Following examples show that the clitic –o appears only once in the sentence:
Permissive imperative is encoded repeating the verb (possibly only the verb kai ‘go’, since no
other examples have been found this far) at the beginning of the clause. In this type of imperative the
personal pronoun is obligatory::
Imperatives can be expressed also without the particle –o. Possibly this is a weaker or ‘more
polite’ way to express orders and wishes.
150
ak ikg la
do.R look say
‘spy’
Verbs expressing the manner of action usually occur before the semantically main verb in the verb
phrase. Normally no other constituents occur between the manner verb and the predicate following
it.
Compare to:
Most verbs indicating aspects also occur preceding the predicate they semantically modify,
forming a verb phrase with it.
Tu la ilm wel
3pl say/INT shoot.IR bird
‘They are going to shoot birds’ (intentional la)
In Urim peripheral semantic roles like Instrument, Location, and Time are usually expressed by
serial verb constructions. Some of these constructions are more lexicalized and preposition-like than
others, but the verbal modal distinction of realis-irrealis is always present.
Nuclear elements of the clause are the predicate, which is usually a verb, and its obligatory or core
arguments. In nonverbal clauses the NP or adjective phrase functions as the predicate. In Urim a
clause can minimally consist of only a single predicative noun phrase. Basic clauses consisting only
of a verb are not allowed2, although this kind of text clause is very common as the result of ellipsis
and clause chaining. All clauses can also have various types of optional adjuncts: accompaniment,
instrument, time, location, reason, etc. In Urim the number of optional elements in a clause is usually
restricted to at most two. The occurrence of these is semantically determined, and does not affect the
description of the basic clause types.
Chart of Urim Basic Clause Types
Name Constituents Functions
C. Transitive clauses
1. Monotransitive clauses NP + Vtr + NP S V O
2. Ditransitive clauses NP + Vtr + NP + NP S V O IO
D. Nominal clauses
1. Equative clauses NP + NP S P
2. Descriptive clauses NP + NP/AP S P
E. Topic clauses
1. Possessive clauses NP + NP (+ Ve) T S (V)
2. Experience clauses NP + NP + V (+Pron) T S V (O)
The important notion of transitivity distinguishes the two most common basic clause types in any
language: intransitive and transitive clauses. There are degrees of transitivity in clauses, since the
notion of transitivity is a graded continuum (Givon 1984: 98, 152-157). In the prototypical, highly
transitive clause the subject referent is a volitional, controlling agent or a non-volitional cause/effector
154
and the object is a concrete, result-registering effect or patient. Many objects are less than
prototypical
In Urim certain clause types have an intermediate degree of transitivity, and are therefore called
here semitransitive. Clearly transitive verb stems are not as common in Urim as in many other
languages. Many verbs can have both transitive (or semitransitive) and intransitive (or reflexive) uses
( 1a), (1b), with no morphologically marking to indicate a change in transitivity. In Urim transitive
verbs are often derived from intransitive ones via addition of the transitive suffixes -en or -e.3. These
suffixes can increase the transitivity of an intransitive verb or clause, making it transitive or
semitransitive (1a), (1c). They can also change semitransitive verbs into fully transitive verbs.
Consider the following examples:
3 The suffix -en is much more common and occurs with all kinds of intransitive verbs, while the suffix -e increases the
transitivity of motion verbs only and occurs more frequently as a continuative aspect marker.
155
(4a) Tu wakrongen-tetn.
3pl like - 2sg.O
‘They like you.’
The subject of an intransitive clause always occurs before the verb and can exhibit almost any
semantic role. In this respect intransitive clauses differ from all other clause types in Urim.
In Urim the subject noun phrase is obligatory in all basic clause types. Even expressions
describing natural phenomena which in many languages have no semantic or surface subjects, or have
a ‘dummy’ subject (like the it in English it rains) require overt subjects in Urim (5a). In text clauses,
however, subjects are often absent as the result of ellipsis, when the identity of the subject referent is
clear from the previous context.
4.2.1. Time Clauses
There are two structurally peculiar types of clause that could be described as subtypes of the
intransitive clause. One of them, which is here called the time clause, consists of one element only;
a noun phrase denoting time of day. The reasons why these words are not considered lexical verbs
are: 1) these time words do not have any case frame with arguments, in other words, the time clause
never has any other obligatory elements except the time word itself, which functions both as the
subject and the predicate of the clause. 2) In Urim nouns and verbs do not usually have the same
morphological form in the lexicon (like English ‘love’ or ‘fish’ for example), although verbs and verb
phrases can easily be nominalized without any formal marking. 3) Another reason fro classifying time
words as nouns is that adjectives can be formed from them by the suffix –et. This is rare with verbs.
4) Aspectual, temporal, and modal particles can occur in this time clause the same way as in verbal
clauses. This is possible, because they do not belong to the verbal morphology but are clausal
particles.
Time words also resemble verbs semantically more closely than most other nouns, since the
points of time are not actually fixed units but processes. Normally nouns represent the most
permanent states, verbs the most rapidly changing states, and adjectives are somewhere in between
(Givon 1979a: 265-266).4
The time clause is fairly common in texts but is sometimes difficult to differentiate from
dislocations.
4 In Urim time is not associated with location like in many other languages (Lyons 1977:669). No locative prepositions
appear in time adverbials; instead the verb ak ‘do’ is used. This word is used also as the instrumental and manner phrase
marker.
157
Another special feature of this clause type is that the subject can easily occur after the verb. In
other intransitive clauses this is very rare and probably impossible in other clause types.
The existence clause often has the same thematic functions as certain left dislocations in Urim and
the existential clause in English; it is used to introduce new items to the text. This explains also why
the subject in this clause type can move so easily after the verb. The position after the verb is
universally the place of new information in the clause, and in existential clauses the subject usually is
158
new information, while in other clause types it is usually given information. The following examples
illustrate how existence clauses and left dislocation are used the same way to introduce main
participants at the beginning of a text. They also show how difficult it is sometimes to tell the
difference between left dislocation and existence clause.
The expression man warim wekg pa here is a verbless existence clause. It cannot be interpreted
as a left dislocation because of the conjunction atom ‘then’ between it and the next clause.
The underlined part of the sentence here is interpreted as an existence clause with verb.
This is a typical case of a left dislocation introducing the main participants in the story. The
dislocation is typically set off intonationally, so that a pause occurs between it and the main clause.
between direct objects and locative objects is that direct objects can be fronted while no fronting of
locative objects has been found in our data.
The ‘less transitive’ status of these clauses is reflected also in the use of transitive suffixes. The
same suffix -en which can change intransitive verbs or clauses into transitive or semitransitive ones
can also change semitransitive verbs into transitive ones. Actually deriving transitive verbs from
semi-transitive ones is much more common in Urim than deriving transitive verbs from intransitive
ones. Compare the following examples (10a,b) with examples (1a,b).
Semitransitive clauses are here divided into three subtypes: locative clauses, directional clauses,
and resultative clauses. The basic structure of these clause types is the same, but they differ in
meaning, in respect to what semantic role the locative object has, and what verbs can function as
predicates.
4.3.1. Directioned Motion Clause
The locative object usually encodes the goal of the motion but also sometimes encodes the source
or starting point. Usually a motion verb (there are about 10 verbs in this special verb class) functions
as predicate. These verbs do not exhibit a realis-irrealis mood distinction. In serial verb phrases
some of them can function to encode locative arguments and as aspect markers (see section 3.3.6).
Directed motion clauses are very common in Urim texts and often form clause-chains. Following are
some examples of directional clauses.
The locative clause is often used to introduce new information. This does not have any effect on
the word order, which seems to be very rigid just like in the directional clause. The subject always
occurs before the verb and the locative object after it.
In both (13a) and (13b) the locative clause marks the beginning of a new paragraph or section in
the text, because it introduces a new important participant or other topic to the text. If the new items
are not topical, i.e. important in the text, they are often introduced by using an embedded locative
clause, as in the following examples.
The semantic role of the transitive subject is almost exclusively that of agent. This means that
usually only animate referents occur as subjects of transitive clauses. Agents are prototypically
animate, volitional and active causes of an action. In Urim forces of nature and moving machines can
also frequently occur as transitive subjects. When other, less prototypical kinds of inanimate entities
occur as transitive subjects there are usually some morphological changes in the clause: the ultimate
agent occurs as clause topic at the beginning (16b), or an instrumental serialization with the verb ak
’do’ is used(16a).8
In example (16b) the actor hurts himself accidentally. In this case the instrument usually appears
as the subject and the actor as the object of the clause
A number of examples are now given of normal transitive clauses with clause initial subjects
bearing the semantic role of agent. Transitive clauses can also have an optional indirect object, which
is usually marked by the preposition eng or the affix -n on the verb (underlined).
8 There are also ways to express that an action normally considered involuntary is performed voluntarily:
The subject of an equative clause is nearly always given information and is therefore marked as
definite by the demonstrative pa. Pa ‘that’ and ti ‘this’ also frequently function as demonstrative
pronouns and encode the subjects of equative and descriptive clauses. In other clause types this
165
pronominal function is very rare - at least there are no examples of it in the text material used here as
data. A possible reason for this might be the potential for confusion with the numerous instances of
pa and ti functioning as conjunctions and discourse markers in more complex sentences. In the
structural simple nominal clauses, there is less possibility of confusion between the various functions
of these demonstrative forms. The equative clause can, contrary to the descriptive clause, also have
proper noun phrases or pronouns as predicates (20a), (20b). Quite often equative clause consists of
one nominal phrase only (20d). In this case the subject pronoun has been deleted.
the individual possessor, and for this reason also possessive clauses are topic clauses.9 In topic clauses
both nominal constituents, topic and subject, precede the verb when it is present, but the verb itself
may be omitted too.
4.6.1. Possessive Clause
In the possessive clause the semantic possessor occurs in topic position and the possessed item
occurs as grammatical subject. This is thematically consistent with the normal ordering of
information in the clause, since the referent of the possessor is usually given information, and the
thing possessed is new information. Since there is no agreement morphology on the verb to show
which NP is the grammatical subject, only word order and semantic content reveal it. The word order
seems to be fixed; the topic and the subject cannot change places in the clause. One example was
found where the subject appeared to occur between the two parts of an appositional topic noun phrase
(23e). The possessor is usually animate, and most often human. Possessive clause may have a verb
denoting the position of the possessed object. There are both verbal and verbless possessive clauses,
but positive possessive clauses are more frequently verbal. The verb seems to be obligatory if there
is another nominal constituent in the clause. Possessive clauses structurally resemble three other
clause types: equative clauses (23b), existence clauses (23e) and locative clauses (23a).
9Foster (in Plank 1979) discusses the notion of possession in different cultures and how it affects the structure of
possessive clauses.
168
The possessive clause is negated differently from most other clause types. Instead of the usual
negative particle ake the nominal negative word kalpis is used and there is no verb.10 Elsewhere,
only existence clauses are negated in this way (see Section 6.3.2). There are two other features shared
between existence clauses and possessive clauses: 1) use of the same verbs, and 2) the existence of
verbless variants. It might be possible to derive some types of possessive clause from an existence
clause or a locative clause by adding a topic, but the structure is fully grammaticalized and the topic is
obligatory.
4.6.2. Experience Clause
The topic of an experience clause is also always animate and semantically an experiencer. The
grammatical subject is usually either a body part, where the feeling etc. is located, or an inanimate
referent which is the cause of the feeling or the object of wanting etc. The only common features
such clauses exhibit are: 1) the semantic meaning of involuntary experience, and 2) the presence of an
obligatory topic constituent before the grammatical subject. Most experience clauses have a bound
object pronoun which is coreferential with the topic (24a), (24d), but this pronoun can be absent,
especially if the grammatical subject is a body part of the experiencer (24b), (24c).
The experience clauses with body parts differ structurally from genitive constructions, which are
always of the form Npossessed + a + Ngenitive (wam a melnum ‘man’s hand’) when the possessor is
specific (see section 3.1.4).
10 Although no instances of possessive clauses having the negative word ake have been found thus far, it remains a
possibility that such a construction could exist. If this were to be the case, clauses negated with ake might have a slightly
different meaning (perhaps having to do with scope of negation) than those negated with kalpis.
169
In contrast to the possessive clause, the experience clause is normally negated using the verbal
negator ake.
Typologically it is a common phenomenon that rigid word order and lack of morphological case
markings occur together in a language. This is especially common in SVO-languages like Urim.
Urim does not have any case marking morphology on either the subject or object, nor is there any
agreement marked on the verb either. Since there is no morphological way to mark which noun
phrase in the clause is subject and which is object, the syntactic position of the noun phrase before or
after the verb is what shows its syntactic function. Not only the subject and transitive object are
unmarked, but also all other obligatory arguments of a verb are morphologically unmarked. This
increases the importance of word order for delineating the functions of NPs in the clause. The
following examples illustrate how a change of word order changes the meaning of clauses and even
the clause type:
Urim has been classified as a Papuan language, stock level isolate in the Torricelli Phylum.. The
question of isolation can be re-considered when some of the neighbouring languages have been
studied in more detail. All Torricelli languages display some similarities with Austronesian
languages: fixed SVO word order, lack of medial verbs, use of transitivity-changing suffixes and
realis-irrealis mood, etc. It seems that Urim has these non-Papuan features to a greater extent than
many other Torricelli languages. It lacks subject-agreement on the verb, and is also in other respects
morphologically simpler than the other Torricelli phylum languages.
Torricelli phylum languages have been thought to be basically Papuan languages which have been
subjected to heavy Austronesian influence. There are some Austronesian languages along the north
coast. Word order is one of the Austronesian features in the Torricelli language group, since Papuan
languages usually are SOV- languages. It is a common theory that SVO- languages often have
developed from earlier SOV-languages either through the influence of some neighbouring SOV-
languages or from language internal reasons. One of these reasons could be the disappearance of
morphological case-marking, which in a way forces the language to rely on the word order in marking
these functions. (Givón 1979a 145-146). If a language were to change its word order from SOV to
SVO, it would be expected that there would be some residues from the former SOV-type structure.
The more recent this change has been, the more residues would be expected. Word order change
most commonly starts from the main-clause level, and later spreads into more complex structures.
According to Givón (1984:220-228). “the longer a language has maintained a rigid OV or VO word
order, the more it is likely to bear out Greenberg’s predictions (1966).” If this is true, then Urim has
been SVO-language at least during the last two thousand years, since it is an unusually pure SVO-
language following all the predictions that Greenberg mentions. All modifiers of the noun phrase and
almost the entire verb phrase occur after the head. There are suffixes, but this is quite a common
feature in SVO-languages in general, and not a strong indicator of a recent change of word order.
Most commonly the residue of the presumed word order would occur in dependent and embedded
clauses and other structures like nominalizations and idioms. But in Urim these have SVO-word
order, except when the subject referent is generic:
This is the only observed possible residue of a former SOV-word order. Assuming this theory is
right Urim is an almost ideal SVO-language typologically. One could perhaps question if it were
easier to derive a language like Urim from an Austronesian group having some heavy Papuan
171
influences than the other way around? But this and the whole question of the classification of Urim
needs much more work before any definite answers or even suggestions can be given.
172
5. Complex sentences
Usually three types of subordinate clauses are distinguished in languages: those which function as
arguments of the predicate (i.e. complements), those which function as modifiers of nouns (relative
clauses), and those which function as modifiers of verb phrases or entire propositions (adverbial
clauses). (Thompson and Longacre, 171). We can find these clause types also in Urim, although with
adverbial clauses it is difficult to distinguish between subordinated adverbial clauses and more
coordinate combinations of clauses. Therefore we conflate the description of adverbial clauses and
coordinate combinations of sentences.
The complementizer a can be left out, especially when the relative clause starts with a time word.
This makes it sometimes difficult to separate relative clauses from clause chains.
It also seems that when one of the temporal adverbs like wet ‘recently, just before’, mpa ‘future’,
ikga ‘later, far future’ etc. is used, the relative pronoun tends to be left out. This is possible because
the time adverb already separates the relative clause from the present time of the story. Notice that the
relative pronoun can sometimes occur after the time adverb, like in the two first examples:
Tu wrong kiinkipman wet (a) kaing-kai wuring pa, wuli wuli pake
3pl group people NP (REL) go-go garden D come come EMP
‘The people who just had went to the garden were arriving now’’
Subject:
Tu melnum a kinar hu kanokg-ai
3pl man REL go.down water bottom-LOC
‘The men who dived to the bottom of the water’
Kopi a watinet paipm paipm a no-wen anel pipa kipm ik kol kil.
coffee REL long bad bad REL go.up-TR pick.R C 2sg do.IR likethis
‘Those coffee trees which are far too tall so that you need to climb in order to pick, you
handle like this.’ (two RCs modifying one NP)
Object:
Kil wel a wuten nimpa a-kupm-en akor ise
3sg bird REL recently dog G-1sg-ATR search.R PERF
‘It is the bird my dog found’ (a verbless equative clause)
Locative:
Tu palng kaino wrik a wuten tu la mpa ikor manto pa
3pl arrive go.up place REL near.past 3pl say FUT search.IR pig D
eng ilm.
OBL shoot.IR
175
‘They arrived upriver to the place where they had said they would search for the pig in
order to shoot it’
compare to:
Tu akor manto pa kainar wrik ti
3pl search.R pig D go.down place this
‘They searched for the pig in this place’
Notice that the indirect object is marked on the verb using the bound personal pronoun -el.
Time:
Irmpen atom wang a kitn kul pa iye-tolo kul
Buy.IR then time REL 2sg come C carry.IR-1pl.IO come
‘Buy it and at the time when you come back, bring it to us with you’
hapm ur a no -we
cloth ID REL come.up-TR
‘a shirt/blouse/dress’
176
wal a tapor
tree REL break.R
‘A broken tree’
wes a ak angket ko
stone REL use:IN cut.R axe
‘a file’
Relative clauses are used especially often when introducing new items or participants in the story.
In the last example the relative clause is embedded into the genitive phrase (about the old
woman) modifying the head noun por ‘story’
When some essentially extraneous information is added about the Head Noun (information that
does not specify its referent) an independent clause or an apposition is often used instead of RC. In
the following example, the new person is introduced using both a relative clause and a ‘normal’
descriptive clause:
177
Relative clauses frequently are quite complex and may occur for example embedded into a
genitive phrase or coordinated as modifiers of the same NP. Relative clauses provide a way to
background less-important information so that the main story line remains in focus:
Urim seems to have no formal morphological devices to form lexical nouns from verbs or
adjectives. Both simple verbs and whole clauses can function as NPs without any overt change in their
morphological structure. Many lexemes freely function as both nouns and verbs, so that it is difficult
to tell which category is more basic. Others seem to be basically verbs but can function also as heads
of NPs.
In the same way, clauses can function as NPs and heads of NPs without any marking, especially
in subject position:
Instrumental subject:
Al -wor huk
Eat.R-good give
‘to give an offering (good food)’
Because of the lack of morphological marking, it is often difficult to tell whether a construction is
part of a clause chain or a nominalization. One common feature to all nominalized verbs is that they
do not get irrealis mode.
Certain types of embedded clauses have also other formal features that separate them from normal
clauses:
compare to:
The parts of this construction are never pronounced or written as one word. Another feature is that
the verb in this construction never gets irrealis mode. When the clause functions as object of a
‘normal’ verb (that is, not one of those verbs taking clausal objects, that are described later in 7.2.2.) it
always ha reversed word order OV. Reason to this might be pragamtical; reversed word order
disambiquates embedded clauses from serials (see the last example above). When the clause
functions as subject, reversed word order is optional. Consider the following example:
b) habitual-continuative marker -e
In Urim the habitual-continuative marker -e often occurs in nominalized clauses, although this is
not the primary function of this device. Primarily it serves to mark continuity and habituality. This
device is more commonly used in relative clauses and sometimes also in adverbial clauses (see the
sections 3.1.3.2 and 5.2). It seems to be used in all types of embedded clauses that are of locative
type:
These two devices, word order OV and suffix -e, may occur in any kind of embedded clauses, but
are not obligatory.
5.2.2. Clausal objects
The number of verbs taking clausal objects is restricted in Urim. Most of the verbs co-occurring
with clausal objects fall into the following semantic groups: causative, emotional verbs, verbs of
sensation, cognitive, and quotative verbs. Some verbs may take either a noun phrase object or a
clausal object, but not both together. Others (especially quotative verbs) can take both a noun phrase
object and a clausal object at the same time. In such cases, the clausal object is usually the second
object. The object NP has the role of Benefactive or Dative. A few verbs take only clausal objects..
181
Clausal objects are usually unmarked morphologically and in speech no pause separates the main
clause from the complement.
Clausal objects are sometimes governed by the conjunctions la ‘speak/that’ or eng ‘OBL’. With
some verbs, the use of a conjunction is obligatory (and these complement clauses are not considered
real clause objects)
With other verbs, semantically obligatory clausal objects are sometimes marked by conjunctions,
and sometimes not. Typically the nominal objects of these verbs are likewise sometimes marked, and
sometimes not. The presence of a governing conjunction in the complement clause seems sometimes
to depend on transitivity, in that a conjunction is used when the action is considered weakly transitive.
For example the action of ‘liking’ / ‘wanting’ in the following examples does not much affect its
object:
The verb la ‘say’ is commonly used to mark quotations, but can also be left out:
kaling ‘to show, teach’ (two objects, the clause object usually generic)
plan ‘to show’ (always two objects, the clause object generic)
ak kopor ‘to win’ (always two objects, the clause object generic)
Semantically these verbs denote events experienced by animate subjects via their eyes, noses or
ears. They can take either a morphologically unmarked clausal object or a nominal one. In this
respect, they are distinct fromthe cognitive verbs. They take only one object (either NP or clause),
but the subject of embedded clause can possibly be raised into object position in the clause (see the
last two examples).
Direct:
Ari man pa la itna, ‘Kupm angket hipm’
but mother D say stand 1sg cut.R leaf
‘But the mother kept saying, ‘I am cutting leaves’
Indirect:
Kil la ake mpa mentekg or-tita
3sg say NEG FUT 1dual fight-RES
‘He says that we should not fight’ (mentekg ‘we two’ does not refer the kil ‘he’ but to
the the speaker of the story)
1dual hear.R 2pl say tell.R-1pO say-say 2sg this now die.R PERF
‘We heard them tell us that you had died!’ (kitn ‘you’ refers to the hearer)
There are no other major formal differences between direct and indirect quotations except perhaps
the word kolpa ‘this way, thus’ which seem to occur only before direct quotes.
Urim also has a very curious type of quotation, which is basically direct but also exhibits features
of an indirect quotation. Thus far examples of this have only been observed in oral texts:
In speech both pronouns, kupm ‘I’ and kitn, ‘you (sg)’ have the same kind of raised imperative
intonation. The first pronoun in the quotation refers to the subject of calling and at the same time to
the speaker. The second pronoun refers to the one being called. (It is not clear whether this structure
is also possible for other person combinations. Also, it would be interesting to know, whether this
kind of double-pronoun imperative clauses are pragmatically special. If so, then the first pronoun
could be a kind of ‘signature’ or identification of the caller meaning something like ‘it is me here who
is calling’.)
the main verb (like manner adverbs usually do) and can therefore possibly be considered
subordinated:
tu ak wail wuli
3pl use.R big arrive
‘They came in crowds’
Often ak functions almost like the purpose marker eng and can be translated in English the same
way ‘for’. The difference is that ak can also indicate the role of instrument, while eng never does.
compare to:
Uwi spun pa ik ukuhal
take.IR spoon D use.IR scrape
’Take a spoon and scrape with it’
Manner clauses marked by -en
In Urim there is also a special type of adverbial manner clause, which always occurs in the middle
of the clause and has a verb morphologically marked by the suffix -en. This attributive suffix has
been described earlier in the section 2.6.2.2. Sometimes this embedded (or nominalized) manner
adverbial clause also has a reversed word order (O V). Curiously though, only a few verbs in Urim
seem to take this suffix in a manner clause, while simple manner adverbs can freely be formed from
all kinds of verbs by the same suffix. It seems that this embedded construction also has the additional
meaning of two actions having temporal overlap. This could explain why so few verbs can occur in
this construction; there are not so very many actions that one actor can perform two at the same time.
Often the manner suffix -en could be glossed ‘with’ in English. Consider the examples:
Tu nangnang-en wuli..
3pl singsing-ATR arrive
‘They came singing and dancing..’
Compare to the function of –en in the following example where it functions in much the
same way as above:
Eng is also used to mark some optional non-Subject arguments of some verbs. The semantic role
is usually Associative ‘concerning, with respect to’, Goal or Reason/Cause:
190
In the following examples the clause marked by eng is actually functioning as a modifier of an
NP, much like the relative clause (see the Chapter 5.1):
In Urim the use of preposition eng has probably increased by the influence of Pidgin language.
This is reflected by the many cases where either eng or some other function word can be used without
any great change of meaning. There are also cases when eng occurs in speech but is rejected in good
written language (the fourth example):
Reason
When eng governs a realis clause referring to something that has already happened or is
happening at the moment, it expresses reason or explanation rather than purpose. In the following
examples eng can usually be glossed ‘because’.
Kupm asen Jon eng kupm akwonalmpen kil antiwe mpa ingkliin topm
1sg ask.R Jon OBL 1sg think.R 3sg enough.R FUT help.IR 1sgO
‘I’m asking Jon because I think he will be able to help me’
It is possible to have several subordinate clauses governed by eng in the same sentence. Both
examples are from a written text:
Stua al-kil pa palng wor engintei, kil ikgalen marpm al-kil ari-wor-wor
store G-3sg D become good why? 3sg look.after money G-3sg see-well-
well
‘His store is prospering, why - because he takes good care of his money.
Compare to:
There are still other types of subordinated clauses (for example conditionals), which could be
described in this chapter. But, because the various functions of Urim conditional conjunctions are
quite complex, and because they often serve to connect more loosely related clauses as well as
subordinated clauses, we will describe them with the other Urim conjunctions , in the following
sections.
Examples:
kitn aye kuina kul?
2sg carry.R what come
‘What are you bringing?’
Serial verb constructions are very common in Urim. However, since Urim verbs have very few
inflectional morphemes, it is often difficult to tell whether a certain construction is a clause chain (i.e.
a series of coordinateclauses with deleted topics) or a serial structure. In Urim conjunctions (usually
pa ‘and, then’) often distinguish the two types of structure.
Compare to:
Kitn ariwe antokg okipma wor-wor pa al.
1sg know.R make.R food good-good C/D? eat.R
‘You know how to make and eat good food’
tu al rpma
3pl eat.R sit.R
‘They are eating (at this moment)’ (serial verb encoding imperfective aspect)
tu al pa rpma
3pl eat.R C sit.R
‘They sit/sat eating’ or ‘are/were eating’ (not necessarily at the moment of speaking)
(clause chain encoding temporal overlap)
compare to:
tu rpma (pa) al.
3pl sit.R (and) eat.R
’They sat down and ate’
On the other hand, it is also often difficult to tell whether a chain of verbs is an idiom or a serial
structure. When a particular combination of verbs is used frequently enough, it gradually comes to be
more lexicalized and idiomatic. Some expressions are somewhere between a serial structure and a
lexeme, others are fully developed into an idiomatic lexeme. The endpoint of the process is when the
combined verbs are phonologically one word and the meaning of the combination is opaque. The
following examples, proceed from verb combinations which are more phrasal and semantically
transparent to those which are more reduced phonologically and/or semantically opaque.
(The verb elngtirmpi ‘put somewhere’ is pronounced as a phonological word when there
is nothing in between the two parts)
197
kawor wan
/kai-hor wan/
go-enter house
‘enter the house’
ikg-ale-n
look-put-TR
‘take care of.R’
5.4.1. The four functions of serial verb constructions in Urim
Serial verb constructions have four functions in Urim. The first function is to encode a single
complex action or set of commonly co-occurring actions. Serial verbs can also serve as an abbreviated
way to express purpose and causation. The third function of serial verbs is more grammatical, for
example adding modal or aspectual meaning to a predication or marking peripheral semantic roles.
These kind of aspectual or modal verbs have historically developed into full clause particles or
prepositions and finally lost their verbal meanings altogether in other languages. The fourth function
of serial verb constructions in Urim is as a means of introducing new lexical items into the language.
All these types of serialization are very common in Urim.
Serialized structures expressing a series of closely related events
Examples of serial verbs encoding a single complex action or series of actions that commonly
occur together are given below:
Serial verbs describing uninterrupted movement from one place to another are very common in
texts, especially in stories:
198
Antokg alk-en al
make.R give.R-3plO eat.R
‘Cooked and gave them to eat’
Compare to:
Awi ko ak are yo
take axe IN cut tree
‘Get an axe to cut down the tree with (it)’
Causation expressed by a serial verb construction with ak ‘(use something to) do’
and antokg ‘do, handle’.
Itatu kul-o!
hurry.R come-IMP
‘Hurry up!’
ak angket
do.R cut.R
‘cut quickly’
Doing something in a group or Inceptive modality expressed by anel ‘pick’
The verb anel ‘pick’ when serialized expresses action done in a group or inceptive aspect.
The combination [la + sentential complement] also frequently functions as the object
compelement of various cognitive, emotional, perceptual and speech verbs.
Voluntarity-directional
The verb elng ’put’ occurs in a serialized construction expressing voluntary actions directed to a
location.
kirmpa elng kinar elng kaino..
plane put go.down put go.up
‘the plane kept going downwards and upwards (intentionally)..
Contrast this with the following example, where the sentence final perfect aspect
adverb ise occurs.
Hu pa wakget ise
water D hot PERF
‘The water is hot (has boiled)’
In the following cases as well, the serial verb marking modality or aspect occurs after the clause it
semantically modifies. This order helps to differentiate the aspectual meaning of the verb from other
meanings.
Conative modality expressed with ari ‘see’
Conative modality—attempting to do something—is expressed using the verb ari (irrealis form
iri)‘to see’.
Ti kipm ik-won-ilmpen iri!
C 2pl do.IR-inside-stir.IR see.IR
‘So you think about it!’
202
lap ak wakg
roast do.R fire
‘roast in/with fire’
ik Sande
do.IR Sunday
‘next Sunday’
tu ak wail wuli
3pl do.R big arrive
‘They came in crowds’
The lexeme anti ‘with; fit, suit’ is used to encode accompaniment, while atnen ‘because of; wait
for, watch’ is used to encode causal adjuncts.
(The source phrase expresses the direction of movement from the point of subject, while the last
verb no expresses the direction of movement from the point of speaker)
The last example, which is from a written text, shows that the reduced form ang- is not just a
feature of rapid speech. Source phrase is partly idiomatized.
Coming from a direction (without the meaning of staying there first) is expressed without
existential verb:
kil kinar ya no
3sg go-down road ascend
‘He is coming from the direction of road’
The prefix ang appears to have become obligatorily bound to several verbs in the language, all of
which have an inherent centrifugal orientation. Notice, that the verbs listed below have the component
‘from somewhere’ in their meaning. Two of these have corresponding forms without ang, while the
others do not.
tu ak nare pa wuli
3pl do.R come.down D arrive
‘The people living in the down river part of the village arrived’
(rmpa functions as an aspect marker while the motion verb kawor expresses a locative semantic
role)
Often the clause marked by wa adds further information that is similar in nature to that of the first
clause (‘and also’).
Compare the preceding two examples to the following one, where a paraphrastic
relationship is expressed via simple juxtaposition without wa:
Wa also binds together two clauses expressing successive, loosely connected actions without any
causative or other dependent relationship. The following two examples are from a written text where
the short form of the conjunction a is used:
Wa can occur sentence initially. In this position it is not always easy to separate it from the
unstressed form of pa that is often weakened into [wa].
209
Wa also often occurs together with other conjunctions. Especially common are the combinations
atom wa ‘and then’ and ari wa ‘but then’. In this combination wa often has the meaning ‘again,
also´.
Ake wrik watipmen itna kar ti. Kitn aki kil ai kai
NEG space plenty stand.R car this 2sg or 3sg LOC go
‘There’s not much space in this car. Only you or he there can go.’
In questions the pronoun aki gives the hearer two or more alternatives. The speaker either asks
which one is the right one or gives a choice of action.
Ampur kitn itna wanyun pa, kitn hor aki kitn kawor hen ai!
do.not 2sg stand.R door D 2sg enter or 2sg go.enter outside LOC
‘Do not stand at the door, come in, or go outside!
Sometimes an additional occurrence of aki at the end of the sentence expresses doubt or hesitation
(the speaker is not sure about the right alternative):
211
Quite often aki occurs in questions in the final position either alone or together with kalpis ‘no’.
The combination aki kalpis also often expresses accusation or other negative attitude;
Questions having irrealis mode and the tag aki express polite requests:
pake contrastive
limitation
Ari - contrast and surprise
Ari is the most common contrastive conjunction. Its function is to mark contrast or
contraexpectation. Typically there is an unexpected event or sudden (especially negative) surprise,
sometimes just some new turn of story. Sometimes ari just marks the change of actor or speaker in
discussion, especially if the speaker answers negatively or otherwise against expectations.
Often the surprise element is strong enough to hinder the intended action:
Sometimes the conjunction ari is hard to tell apart from the verb ari ‘see’ (possibly developed
from this verb?).
Kil kai ari wring al-kil ari manto al.
3sg go see.R garden G-3sg but pig eat.R
‘He went to see his garden but (or: saw that) a pig had eaten (it)’
Ari seems to more often mark negative rather than positive changes or surprises in the story. This
tendency is highlighted in the way it combines with the negator kalpis to emphasize even more the
negative nature of the surprising event. The combination ari kalpis is commonly used in narrative
texts to indicate a turning point of a story.
‘He shot it....But the pig did not die, and then Akalpm shot with a bow and arrow and
then it went and died.’
Kil lala mpa kil ingkliin-topm pake ake kil angkliin-topm, kalpis
3sg say-say FUT 3sg help.IR-1sgO but NEG 3sg help.R -1sgO not
‘He promised to help me, but did not.’
The conjunctions ari and pake often seem to overlap in their meanings.
Ari seems to be used more often when the clause expresses some new incident that hinders the
plan, while pake is used more often when the hindering element already exists or is known (like the
price of a car). This is just a tendency, not a rule. The uses of these conjunctions seem to overlap at
least partly.
1) When the two clauses express contrastive comparison, either in quantity or in quality or on
positive-negative.
Kupm ari anong wrongkwail pake ake kupm ari Lae pa.
1sg see.R village many but not 1sg see.R Lae D
215
3) The word pake also functions an emphatic particle having scope over either the whole
sentence or particular noun phrases. In the available corpus of texts, the emphatic particle function of
pake is much more common than its conjunctive function. Emphatic pake is especially common in
narrative texts and conversations, while the conjunction pake is comparatively rare in narrative text.
When pake has scope over the whole sentence, it usually occurs last in the sentence, and therefore is
not easily confused with the conjunction pake.
‘But Minelam we called director’ (or: Minelam we called a director/It was Minelam we
called director)
Tu la nak -el la-la ‘Man al-kitn am amo ise Atom kil hakg...
3pl say tell.R-3sgO say-say mother G-2sg now die.R PERF then 3sgcry
‘They told to her ‘Your mother has died’. Then she cried..’
Atom often marks beginning of a new paragraph. Occasionally it is used in the beginning of a
story after introduction:
(The occurrence of atom before pause makes it more emphatic. In this position it is also
pronounced with strong and rising intonation)
The conjunction atom quite often occurs together with the conjunction pa when there is
conditional and causative meaning connected with the time sequence:
In its function of marking a change of actor or some other kind of discontinuity in the story, atom
often occurs together with the neutral coordinative conjunction wa ‘and’:
‘he died. And then they buried that man. (end of story)’
- If the actions form an habitual sequence of actions. Compare the following examples
- When the clauses just tell about moving from one place to another or some other sequence of
actions in which there are no pronounced breaks:
We have seen above that atom has a double function: 1) it conjoins clauses relating successive
events, and 2) it indicates some sort of discontinuity in the story—change of actor, change of direction
of movement, change of topic etc.
In addition atom can sometimes also denote causative relationships between subsequent actions.
In this function it can be glossed ‘so, therefore’:
Kupm maminikg eng elng kaino elng kinar, atom kupm asen la, ...
1sg afraid OBL put go.up put go.down so/then 1sg ask.R say
‘I was afraid when the plane went up and down, and therefore I asked her, ...’
Kupm palng wor kai wam akilen. Atom kupm alk-el manto uraur
1sg become well go hand 3sgPoss so/then 1sg give.R-3sO pig three
‘I became well in his care. Therefore I gave to him three pigs..’
The use of the conjunction atom partly overlaps that of pa. Both can have temporal or causative
interpretations. The conjunction pa is more often used to express causal relations, however, while
atom is more favored for temporal ones. Another difference is that atom usually expresses some sort
of discontinuity.
Atom also overlaps with ari (change of speakers in conversations). The difference is that ari
emphasizes the element of surprise or contrast.
Temporal adverbs as connectives
Urim language has several temporal adverbs (am, wet, weti, wuten, ikga, katnukg, mpa) which
are used to mark the time when situations occur. These typically occur without an associated
conjunction and indicate temporal discontinuity; i.e. a switch to a different temporal setting.
220
The temporal adverb am ‘now’ functions more like a conjunction. This word is one of the
commonest words in Urim spoken texts (750 occurrences in a corpus of 37 texts). Its basic meaning
is ‘now’, but if present time is really in focus, then usually other expressions are used instead (like ak
wang ti, am ti). Am seems to be especially common in discussions and other spoken texts and less
common in written texts. In spoken discussions it seems to replace the conjunction pa emphasizing
the actions suddenness or immediateness, or referring to present time.
In following examples am between clauses indicates that the second action follows immediately
after the first meaning something like ‘and right away’.
‘Very early in the morning, when it still was dark, the two of them called their dogs and
left straight away. Then they descended...’
When am occurs in a clause having the perfect aspect adverb ise, it can refer to something that
happened earlier but is still valid at the time of utterance. For example the state or action is still
continuing at the time of utterance (see also the first example above). Am often occurs in clauses
giving added background information to a story (second example below):
The combination am ... pake is used also in modal meaning to add emphatic certainty to the
proposition:
Kol pikekg kil wuli pipa, kil kol am kupm ikle-wel pake
HYP past 3sg arrive C 3sg HYP now 1sg scold.IR-3sgO EMP
‘If it had happened that he would have arrived yesterday, I certainly would have scolded
him’
In the same way as pa, am is also used to add vividness at important points in oral narratives. In
such instances, it is often repeated two or more times in the same clause or sentence.
spoken texts. In written texts connective instances of am are much less common. since it can be
often left out without big changes in meaning. Still, it can occur in written texts.
5.5.6. Causative conjunctions pa, ti, and combinations
Introduction
In Urim both the near demonstrative pronoun ti ‘this, here’ and the far demonstrative pronoun pa
‘that, there’ can serve as conjunctions. In addition to functioning as a demonstrative modifier in the
noun phrase, a locative adverb, and a topic marker, it also serves as a conjunction. The conjunction pa
is by far the most frequent of all Urim conjunctions, and occurs in a wide range of constructions from
coordinative to conditional. These demonstratives also occur as components in the following
compound conjunctions: conditional pipa ‘if’ (pa+pa - reduplicated form of pa), adversative pake
(pa+ completed aspect marker ise), which was illustrated earlier in Section 5.5.4.2 and in
combinations pa ti and ti pa.
It is a very common phenomenon in languages that deictic pronouns or words derived from
deictic pronouns also function as conjunctions. It is especially common to have causative
conjunctions formed out of demonstratives, since they point to textual material as the explanation,
reason, or basis for what is said.
The conjunction pa
The different functions of pa
The word pa is the commonest word in Urim. In a corpus of 35 texts containing over 28,000
words pa occurs about 355 times. This corpus contains mostly spoken texts but also some written
ones. Pa is somewhat less common in written texts. In some clauses the word pa occurs 4 times.
This is possible because of the many functions of this morpheme. The basic meaning of pa is far
deictic—‘there’. When it functions as a modifier within a noun phrase, pa usually marks givenness /
psychological accessibility of a referent to the hearer, but it can also function as a topic marker
following various sorts of topicalized or left-dislocated constituents indicating a new temporal setting,
a new or changed topic, or focus. As a phrasal head, pa can have following functions: deictic pronoun
‘that’, locative adverb ‘there’, emphatic particle, and conjunction.
In speech pa has certain phonetic features that help distinguish its various functions. As a
conjunction, pa is either preceded or followed by a pause. Native speakers are often unsure about
where to write the comma in written language. But in spoken language the differences of function
associated with pre- or post-pausal occurrence of pa are clearer. It is generally the case in the
language that whenever a conjunction occurs before a pause, it is pronounced with a distinctive rising
intonation and often its final vowel is also lengthened. This is true for pa as well.
223
- Pa occurs before a pause following causal adverbial clauses or the protases of conditions,
but it can also express temporality, when the speaker wants to emphasize what follows, like
in the example below where something unexpected happens:
In the following examples pa marks only time-sequence or possibly weak causation (for example,
one had to land to Madang first in order to sleep, but sleep does not necessarily follow). In the
following examples, commas are used to indicate where the pauses occur.
Atom men plelng yaper-kinar angko Madang pa, hokg mining wris
then 1pl.Exc turn back-go.down fall.R Madang C sleep night one
‘So we turned back, landed to Madang and slept there one night’
The use of coordinative pa between clauses is often optional; it can be left out without any change
in meaning:
Kil kaki kwei (pa) rampukg
3sg peel.R yams C dry.R
‘She peeled and dried the yams’ (there is very little difference in intonation between these
two possibilities, except possibly a very short pause before pa)
In the following example pa is more emphatically temporal and can be glossed ‘when- then’ in
English. (The example is from written text with no comma before or after pa) In this example pa
clearly functions as a subordinating conjunction:
In some cases pa occurring after pause could be interpreted as either temporal or causative
(marking result or conclusion).
Pa can also have emphatic uses. When the speaker wants to highlight some parts of story, pa is
repeated several times in the same sentence seemingly ‘unnecessarily’. In the first example below
repeated use of pa seems to emphasize the certainty of promise. Second example is an important
turning point of the story. Last example is from a sermon. Repeated pa is also often used to
emphasize the ‘teaching’ point of a traditional story.
interpretation. Possibly there is no clear-cut difference between causatives and conditionals in Urim,
as far as the use of pa goes. When the speaker wants to express that the reason etc. is uncertain or
hypothetical, he adds irrealis mood and/or the particle kol to the clause.
Conditional clauses are clauses whose semantic role is the expression of hypotheses or conditions
(Crystal 1980). There are some similarities between topics and conditionals. In many languages both
may be marked by similar morphemes. This is also true in Urim - one of the main functions of pa is
to mark topicalized constituents.
The conjunction pipa is more common in conditional constructions than pa, especially in written
texts (see section 5. 5. 6. 4).
Examples:
Also a presuppositional pa occurring before the pause can be used purely in the meaning ‘when’
or ‘then’ - without any kind of clear causativity, like in the following examples:
The following examples are from a written procedural text about how to operate a computer.
Note the use of irrealis mode, which is typical in such texts:
‘Then take the end of that black (cord), then the one with hole, then you push it into the
hole where a wire is sticking out from, that’s it, it is that where you plug it in now. After
that, push the black thing that is uphill (elevated) push that now, so then it will be ‘on’.’
When pa occurs before a pause following a clause with irrealis mode, the combination typically
functions as a conditional protasis:
A conditional pa occurring before pause can be followed with another pa occurring at the
beginning of the next clause; the double use is possibly emphatic:
Compare :
Kol hu wei pa, mentepm irki wan
if water rain.IR C 1pl.Inc stay.IR house
‘If there is rain, we will stay at home’ (conditional reason - irrealis result)
Usually the result clauses marked by ti refer to something that has actually happened or is
considered to be a fact. Consequently the verb in the result clause is usually has realis mode. All the
following examples are from conversations, expressing reactions to present situations or
explanations/answers in response to questions. The conjunction ti refers to something that has just
been said or has just happened, or to a present condition:
The conjunction ti only rarely marks a result that has not happened or is uncertain:
Ti often refers to the content of a longer stretch of speech or to a whole story, which has just been
told, as the explanation for a current state of affairs.
All the examples presented in this section clearly show that the near demonstrative ti is used as
causal conjunction instead of pa to mark the grounds or reasons for responses in cases where the
speaker wants to point to a context or comment that is temporarily or spatially near.
Combinations pa ti and ti pa.
pa ti
The combination pati also refers back to something told or happened as explanation or reason, but
it differs from pa or ti in that it often refers further back than to just the previous clause or a present
situation. It is also more emphatic (meaning something like ‘for this reason and no other reason’ or
‘in that case’) than plain pa or ti. In conversations pati is very common:
Asen pa pati pa kupm hatn-hatn hining. Ampake kupm ansil kwei ur.
ask.R D C D 1sg roam.R-roam.R in vain unable 1sg meet.R thing ID
‘(You) asked and for this reason I wandered in vain. I could not find any game.’
(refers to a situation where the hearer broke the taboo of not speaking to a hunter - this
happened some days earlier, not recently)
Pa ti may also refer to things that have recently happened or been said:
‘And this is why there are bats living on that pond (in a cave)’ (refers as explanation to
the part of story just told)
Pati is often used to mark a new theme/topic, which the speaker is about to begin (‘as for’ /
‘regarding’).
ti pa
The combination ti pa occurs mainly in conversations and seems to largely synonymous with pa
ti:. Often it also has explanatory meaning (‘so, you see’).
Pipa occurring in a clause together with realis modus expresses that the proposition either really
has happened or is sure to happen. In these clauses pipa could be glossed ‘whenever’. These cases
are comparatively rare..
More commonly pipa occurs with clauses having irrealis mode functioning as the protases of
conditional sentences.
Kitn la-la inung pipa, mpa kitn inung elng-kinar wurkapm pake
2sg say-say vomit.IR if FUT 2sg vomit.IR put-go.down paper EMP
‘If you feel like vomiting, you must vomit into this paper bag’
kil kaino wa la
3sg go.up and say.
‘If they will not listen to my talk, I’ll tell Dik, he will go and talk to them’
When conditional protasis is much less certain in its potential factuality, or even counterfactual,
then the adverb kol is attached at the beginning of the protasis clause (see Section 7:6):
Some conditional sentences do not have any overt conjunction intervening between the protasis
and the apodosis, for example when the future temporal adverb mpa starts the clause:
The conjunction pipa is also used in the combination plalng (pi)pa (see Section 7.6.7):
When it expresses similarity,kol can be glossed as ‘like, similar to, as’. With this meaning it
governs both phrases or clauses,and often co-occurs with demonstratives (kolpa ‘like that’, kol ti
‘like this’, kolai ‘how’ and kolti ‘only’, etc.). The longer form kolen is less common, but seems to
have approximately the same range of uses as kol.
1. Both kol and kolen function as prepositions taking a noun phrase as their complement. There does
not seem to be any clear difference in meaning between kol and kolen. Possibly kolen is a bit more
emphatic: ‘just like’. (In Urim prepositions can be formed by the suffix -en; for example nampokgen
‘together with’ and atnen ‘because of’.)
2. Kol and kolen also occur as modifiers of numerals expressing approximate quantity; ‘about,
something like’:
3. In the following example kol can be glossed ‘for example’ and marks several entities picked
from a group of suitable ones:
4. Kolen sometimes governs the complements of the verb palng ‘become’. It also occurs in the
predicates of equative clauses indicating a lack of precision.
Kol is also used to compare whole clauses. The verb of comparative clause is quite often deleted:
From the examples above we can see that kol is used in those conditional clauses where the
situation is less likely to occur or is even known to have not occurred (i.e. counterfactual modality). It
is not used when the condition is considered a fact or at least quite probable.
Kol pikekg kil wuli pipa, kil kol am kupm ikle-wel pake
HYP past 3sg arrive C 3sg HYP now 1sg scold.IR-3sgO EMP
‘If it had happened that he arrived yesterday, I certainly would have scolded him’
Shopen (1987:250) states: “The typical conditional sentence consists of a condition and a
consequent. Both condition and consequent can in principle be evaluated for their degree of
(epistemic) actuality.” In Urim, kol indicates states of affairs that are assumed to be less likely to
occur or are assumed to have not occurred. The form kolen also occurs in conditional sentences,
possibily indicating events that are even less likely to have occurred, but it is difficult to be sure of
this on the basis of present data. Often it can be glossed ‘as if, in case of’ and is more like a clause
adverbial than a conjunction. Consider the following examples:
Kol kipm itnuhurng okipma a Maur Wor pa kipm mpa nikg ilm-pepm
HYP 2pl forsake.IR food G spirit good D 2sg FUT belly shoot.IR-
2plO
pa kolen ikg ake kipm itni titnogket eng kutnun Maur Wailen’
C HYP later NEG 2pl stand.IR strong OBL follow.IR Spirit Big
‘If you do not eat the food of the Holy Spirit, then you’ll become hungry, this means that
you won’t stay firm to follow God’
Kol is commonly used in procedural and other texts when the speaker uses examples to clarify his
message. Here it can be glossed as ‘for example, for instance, supposing, in case’ etc. (Compare this
to the similar use of kol governing noun phrases). Notice in the second example that kol is
accompanied by the conjunction atom (if -then) instead of the usual pa or pipa:
Kol warim ur pa hakg-en kol kupm ti. Pa kol kil ti la-la, amur hakg
like child ID D cry-IO like 1sg D C like 3sg D say-say don’t cry
‘For example, if a child cries after me for example, then she would say; don’t cry!’
Kol kipman ak al-kil kai atom, kol kupm ti, kupm al yampis
like man use.IR G-3sg go then like 1sg here 1sg eat.R bean
‘Supposing the men alone go, then - like me here, I would eat beans then’
Wa kol kitn la nira krakg wail pipa, mpam kitn rku ‘shift’ pa,
and like 2sg say write letter big if FUT 2sg push.IR ‘shift’ D
pa mpa kil nira krakg wail. Wa ‘lock’ pa am wa kol shift’ pake.
D FUT 3sg write letter big and ‘lock’ D now and like ‘shift’ D.Emp
Kol kitn rku ‘lock’ pa pa, mpa kil nira krakg wail.
like 2sg push.IR ‘lock’ D if Fut 3sg wrote letter big
‘And when you want to write big letters, you should press the ‘shift’ and it will write big
letters. The button ‘lock’ is just like the ‘shift’. If you press ‘lock’ it will write in
capitals.’
Some parts of the preceding sentence like the perfect aspect marker ise, are never repeated in a
tail-head linkage construction.
.
Am pir-ng kai anong ise. Pir-ng kai anong naki tu...
now run-TR go village PERF run-TR go village tell.R 3pl
‘Immediately (she) run to the village. Run to the village and told them...’
240
In Urim tail-head linkage functions paragraph-internally. Usually (but not necessarily) sentences
linked in this way have the same subject.
In the following two examples the tree wallaby and its movements are the overall topic, despite
the brief switch to the speaker as subject.
When topic changes inside the paragraph, tail-head linkage is left out like in the following extract
of a story:.
Wang ur pa kil awi yikal. Kil awi yikal kai rpma wring pa.
time ID D 3sg take.R bow 3sg take.R bow go sit.R garden D
Am Kinkainil pa kul no wring pa. Kul no no,
now Kinkainil D come come up garden D come come up come up
wam kai nalu wayu pa..
hand go pick.R taro C
‘One time he took a bow. He took a bow and went to wait in the garden. Now
Kinkainil came up to the garden. She came up, hand went to pick a taro...’
Tail-head linkage seems to indicate that events follow each other in sequence and that the various
events take place in approximately the same location. It also marks that the topic keeps the same
inside the paragraph. Possibly it’s basic meaning is simply continuity (of action, location, actors).
Tail-head linkage in written text:
Tail-head linkage mainly occurs in oral texts. In written texts it is relatively rare. When tail-head
linkage occurs in a written text, it is often more truncated than in spoken texts. Compare the
following extracts from the spoken and written versions of the same text by the same speaker. The
tail-head linkage of the spoken version is shortened in the written version into plain conjunction pa
‘and then’:
241
Consider also the following extracts of another story spoken and written by one person. Here all
tail-head linkages of spoken text are missing from the written version:
‘Story about me and Karis hunting in moonlight down at Walpang. Then we two
went down and down near the river, and he felt sleepy, and he slept on a fallen trunk
of tree. I sat watching him.’
Written texts can be more concise than spoken texts, without the danger of the hearer missing
some of the information. Therefore devices like tail-head linkage, which slow down the rate of
information flow, are not so necessary in written texts as in spoken text. Still, some of the best
authors of Urim do use tail-head linkage in their written texts to bind the paragraphs together, and
especially to highlight the important points in the story:
In this text tail-head lingkages occur only at this point, which describes the most important event
in the story.
Dislocations and topic constructions instead are very common in Urim. In these constructions the
topicalized or emphasized constituent occurs separately in front of the actual sentence, which relates
to it in some way. In most cases the external topic corresponds to some NP constituent in the clause
in which the external topic has some function. In left dislocation there is a grammatical element in the
243
clause (usually a pronoun), which refers to the same entity. In topic constructions this does not occur
(Shopen p. 355).
6.1.1. Moving of subject after verb
Placing the subject after the verb is rather rare in Urim but can occur at least in certain clause
types and when there is no danger of misinterpretation. No examples of this have been found in
transitive clauses, but it seems to happen with subjects of transitive verbs in topic constructions
(second example).
The thematic motivation of moving the subject after the verb seems to be strong emphasis or
focusing of new information. In spoken utterances the subject NP is usually phonologically
emphasized, being pronounced with high pitch and stress on the last word.
6.1.2. Object fronting
The Object can occur in front of the subject, or sometimes between the subject and verb, without
any danger of misinterpretation, since in Urim transitive clauses the subject referent is usually more
animate and than the object referent. If both subject and object are animate, a fronted subject is
usually overtly marked as topic via use of the demonstrative pa or a pronoun:
Most frequently object fronting occurs in texts, where the topic is an inanimate entity, which
cannot freely occur as subject. In following examples the fronted object represents new information:
It has been possible to elicit an example of a fronted locative objects, but none have been found in
natural texts, and some speakers do not consider it to be very good language:
Compare to:
Kupm okipma rmpa kai wan
1sg food lie.R go house
‘I have food, in the house’
In certain cases object may occur before verb also in subordinated clauses. This seems to be
possible only when the object is generic. The construction does not seem to have any thematic
function.
Time adverbials frequently occur sentence initial, marked as topics and providing the temporal
setting of a story or indicating a new section of the discourse:
Wang ur pa, mentekg Karis hel kainil
time ID D 1dual Karis roam moon
‘One day, I and Karis, we hunted in moonlight.’
In the following examples, the external topic has actually developed into a clause-like ‘heading’
which are especially common in spoken traditional stories. In the second example the heading
corresponds with the object of the subsequent sentence, and this object is also fronted to further
emphasize the new, surprising participant in the story.
There are different ways to introduce topical new referents. Left dislocations and special
presentative constructions are used. This is especially the case at the beginning of texts, but also
happens sometimes at the beginning of a new paragraph.. When new main participants are introduced
in a narrative text, very often the combination of ur pa is used (with or without left dislocation). Here
the indefinite ur expresses that the participant is new information, while the demonstrative pa marks
the referent of the NP as topical. If the identity of the new participant is further specified by a
relative clause, pa is not used:
Generic and some inherently definite items are introduced without any indefinite quantifiers or
demonstratives , regardless of whether or not they are topical. When the introduced participants are
inherently definite NPs like pronouns or proper nouns, the beginning of a story is often marked by
adding pa or ur pa to a sentence-initial time adverbial.
If the new participant or other topic is introduced using special presentative clauses like the
following, no deictic particles are used:
In the last example the theme or name of this traditional story is mentioned in the presentative
clause, and the main actor is marked as topical via use of ur pa.
New important participants can also be introduced by using just pa. This commonly happens in
traditional narratives, where the participants are already familiar to the hearers:
In case the new referents are not topical, i.e. they will not be recurringly referred to in the text,
they are often modified by an embedded locative clause when first introduced, as in the following two
examples.
There is universal tendency in languages to avoid having new information introduced into the text
in Subject position (Givon 1979a :72-74). In Urim, however, it is possible to have Subjects introdu-
cing new information, but often left-dislocations, existence clauses or topic structures are used to
avoid this. Only topical, important items are introduced to the text in subject position. Less important
items are usually introduced in the typical position of new information after the verb. In Urim this NP
introducing new information quite often has an embedded locative clause as a constituent. Some of
these are lexicalized into deictic adverbials, like the expression ha-pa in the examples above.
250
If the referent is not particularly important and there can be only one such item at the certain point
of the story, no marker of definiteness or indefiniteness is necessarily used. Consider the following
examples:
Ir wanyun!
close.IR door
‘Close the door!’
251
In the first example it is assumed that the river is the nearest one, and it is not really important
which creek he followed. In the second example the referent is known from the situation.
From the examples above one can see, that pa is more a marker of textual givenness rather than
just a general marker of giveness. Items known from the speech situation are referred to by NP + pa
usually only when there is a real meaning of distance.
6.2.3. The use of pa with pronouns to mark changing topic
When the deictic particle pa occurs with pronouns or other inherently definite noun phrasess, it
has special functions. It can be used to emphasize or clarify the referent, but usually its occurrence
with a pronoun marks a changing topic.
In Urim the same pronoun can occur in successive clauses referring to two different participants
without any occurrences of full noun phrases in between. This is possible, because the demonstrative
pa can also be used with pronouns to indicate a changing referent.
In following examples, pa is used with pronouns or generic nouns to mark changing actor-topic:
Kupm pa ake pikekg la mpa ... Am men kai ... kil pa la-la, ...
1sg D NEG past say FUT now 1pl Exc go ... 3sg D say-say
‘I did not intend to ..... Now we went ..... she said...’
Mentekg kul angko Wewak ti, kil arum karek ilmpa wris
1dual come fall.R Wewak this 3sg break.R hen egg one
pa, mentekg al ... ari kupm pa la; ... Mentekg kul-kul
C 1dual eat.R but 1sg D say 1dual come-come
kupm asen kil pa om, .... Ari kil pa la-la...
1sg ask.R 3sg D now but 3sg D say-say
‘We came landed here at Wewak, she broke an egg and we ate ... But I said, ... We kept
travelling and I asked her now, ... And she said, ...’
The use of pa is not automatic with a change of Subject. Its use seems to require that the referent
of the pronoun will persist as the Subject in more than just one sentence; i.e.topicality governs this use
252
of pa. In the last example, the pronouns kil ‘he’ and kupm ‘I’ are without pa in spite of the fact that
they represent changing actor. The reason why pa never occurs with plural pronouns in this example
might be, that since ‘we’ includes both actors, the topic is not really viewed as changing. Notice also
that Object pronouns can be marked by pa when its referent occurs as actor-topic in the next sentence.
In the following example, the pronominalized Object is marked as topical by using pa, before the
referent occurs as subject:
Atom kupm la naki kil pa la-la, ... Atom kil la, ...
Then 1sg say tell.R 3sg D say-say, ... then 3sg say, ...
‘Then I told to him, .... And he said, ...’
The following example shows clearly how pa is used to show that topic keeps the same, while
subject changes:
Kil antokg nangnang pa, kiin alkil ampake huk waprekg kil pa,
3sg make.R sing-sing D woman 3sgPOS not.can give smoke 3sg D
kil pa ampake huk kweikwei kiin pa, pa angklon
3sg D not.can give food woman D C forbidden.R
‘When he is doing singing and dancing, his wife cannot give tobacco to him, nor can he
give anything to his wife, that is forbidden.’
This text describes men’s initiation. The man is topic here, not the woman.
The topic-changing function of pa is especially clear in these instances where it occurs with
pronouns, since the referents of the pronouns are clearly known. This use of pa makes it possible to
to track two different referents in long stretches of text using just pronouns.
6.2.4. Uses of zero-anaphora in Urim
As is the case in many languages (Givón, 1979:300), zero-anaphora is the commonest form of
anaphora in Urim. Zero-anaphora is used to refer to highly topical referents that are being
maintained over multiple clauses. The topic may be represented by a zero anaphora pronoun in quite
many subsequent clauses. Zero-anaphora is not restricted to referents bearing a particular semantic
role like actors. In the following short quote the topic is instrument:
‘Very poor rope like that, what can you do with [it] , it will
break.’
253
In the following example zero-anaphora refers first to the car, then without any explanation, to the
driver of the car. Both represent the topic of the story.
In the example above, zero-anaphora seems to indicate that the same topic is being maintained,
even though the Subject changes.
In the text, from which the above example is taken, the main participant is a girl and the second
participant is a snake. The snake is only referred to with zero-anaphora or a full noun phrase, never
with a pronoun. The girl, on the other hand, is referred to using pronouns or zero-anaphora. In the
example above, all cases of zero-anaphora refer to the snake except the last one, which refers to the
girl. The identity of the referent of the last zero-anaphora is pragmatically inferred. Usually, however,
if the actor changes, a full pronoun with topic marker pa would be used
In those texts, where the topic is an Object, it is frequently represented by zero-anaphora when it
is maintained across multiple clauses:
Notice in this example, that the actor tu ‘they’ (actually an impersonal plural in Urim) is mostly
mentioned as a full pronoun and only once represented by a zero pronoun. This shows very clearly
that zero-anaphora in Urim is not governed by actor role, nor the grammatical role of subject. In
narrative texts where the topic is usually one of the participants, zero-anaphora usually refers to the
actor- subject.
Even in topic-chain, if it is long enough, there is a need eventually to insert a pronoun. Pronouns
are always used, when there is a switch from background to foreground or vice versa. In Urim
pronoun or full NP is often used also after a topic clause (see the section 4.8 about topic clause) even
when the topic keeps the same. Zero-anaphora never refers to the subject of a topic clause, which is
natural since the subject is hardly ever topical even in grammaticalized or lexicalized topic clauses.
Texts
7.1. Wampung
Tree wallaby (spoken story)
Mentekg kinar wreren minip pa, atom kil pa ikgyokg al -el paipm.
1dual go down near river C then 3sg D sleepyness eat.R-3sgO bad
Atom hokg rmpa nung rmpa pa
then sleep lie.R wood lie.R D
‘When we had gone down near the river, he felt very sleepy, and he slept lying on a fallen
tree trunk.’
Ari har
but miss
‘But it missed.’
7.2. Wampung
Tree wallaby (written story)
Kupm arpmen -tel rpma, kil hokg rmpa rmpa, kupm kaino itna tatu
1sg watch.R -3sgO sit.R 3sg sleep lie.R lie.R 1sg go up stand around
kaino -wai, nungkulkg lan lan hining.
go down-remote ear pierce pierce in vain
259
‘I kept watching him, he slept a long time, I went up stood around there and listened in vain.’
Atom kupm la naki kil pa la-la; kitn tipon wakg tos pa iri!
then 1sg say tel.Rl 3sg D say-say 2sg wring.IR fire torch D
see.IR
‘Then I told him, make a torch to see!’
Atom kupm la nak -el la -la; kitn itni kupm kaino ilm.
then 1sg say tell.R-3sgO say-say 2sg stand.IR 1sg go.up shoot.IR
‘And I told him; stay here, I go up to shoot.’
Ari kupm kaino alm kaino wunei pa, alm alm alm, hining.
but 1sg go.up shoot.R go.up tree sp. D shoot.R shoot.R shoot.R in vain
‘But I went up to wunei-tree to shoot, shot and shot and shot, in vain.’
Atom wa kil pa alm ari har, atom am wa yaper kaino mirmping ise.
then and 3sg D shoot.R but miss then now and back go up tree sp. PERF
‘And he shot but missed, and the wallaby climbed back to the mirmping-tree.’
Kupm ras-ras kul nar kanokg ti, pirng kaino itna wunei yiprokg pa
1sg rush-rush come descend ground this run.to go up stand.R tree sp. root D
‘I rushed down to the ground, run up to the base of the wunei-tree.’
Kil la-la nar eng elng kai wap pa, ari kupm
3sg say-say descend OBL put go breadfruit-tree D but 1sg
perng taluk am kai meng ise
throw spear now go neck PERF
‘It tried to come down and go to a breadfruit tree, but I threw spear and hit it to the neck.’
‘ I want to tell you about the day we came and what we saw and did on that day.’
‘ The day we came we put together the luggage and went down to the airstrip.’
‘Pirkko and Debi together with us two me and Josech and some people also who carried Pirkko’s and
Debi’s things, we went down to the airstrip.’
Men kul ari hu kop Sepik pa men kul angko wreren ari waipmunu
men kul ari hu kop Sepik pa men kul angko ureren ari waipmunu
1pl.Exc come see.R water river Sepik D 1pl.Exc come fall.R near see.R cloud
‘We travelled and saw the Sepik river and we came nearer but clouds were blocking the way of the
airplane, and we turned back and landed to Madang and slept one night there.’
‘Then early at morning when the sun started to shine we came up.’
‘When the sun was getting high (at noon) we arrived at Ukarumpa.’
‘When we were coming, on the way, we saw big rivers, big mountains and many villages.’
‘We saw the Ramu river and also some tiny rivers.’
263
‘And we saw the sea when we slept at Madang, and we saw those flying foxes also.’
‘About the house we slept in, we slept in a big house of Lutheran Mission with the pilot.’
a kul ti.
a kul ti
REL come here
Bus picked us from the airstrip and took us up to the house of Pirkko and Debi.
Monto rpma waiketn plalng pipa mentekg Josech nar Translator Lodge.
minto arpma waiketn plalng pa-pa mentekg Josech nar Translator Lodge
1pauc. Sit.R little finish D -D 1dual Josech come.down Translator Lodge
‘We sat a little while there and then I and Josech went down to the Translators Lodge.’
‘The man who looked after the Translator Lodge gave us key to one room and sleeping things and then
we opened the door and put our things inside.’
‘We locked the door and went down to the print-shop to buy pieces of paper.’
Atom mentekg aye wurkapm wompel pa kai plan melnum a arpmen wan.
atom mentekg aye wurkapm wompel pa kai plan melnum a arpma-en wan
then 1dual carry.R paper piece C go show man REL sit -TR house
265
‘Then we took the pieces of paper and showed to the man who looked after the house.’
‘We bought food and carried it to the house and cooked and ate and stayed there.’
‘We stayed there five days and then we went down to the Training Centre at the first day of the
course.’
‘When we went down to the Training Centre, Debi took us there by car.’
‘When we had received a house (to stay) she went up to the house of her and Pirkko.’
8. Bibliography
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology. A study of the relation between meaning and form. Typological
studies in language 9. Benjamins Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Chafe, W.L. 1976. ‘Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and points of view.’ in
Li, C.N (Ed.) Subject and Topic, Academic Press: NY, NY.
Crystal, David. 1985. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Vol 1. Cambridge: C.U.P.
Comrie, Bernard 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Basil Blackbell, Oxford.
Comrie. Bernard 1982. Aspect. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Fillmore, Charles 1968. The case for case. In Bach & Harms (1977, ed.)
Foley, William A. & Robert D. van Valin JR. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar.
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 38, Cambridge.
Foster, J. 1979. Agents, accessories and owners. In Plank (1979, ed.).
Givón, Talmy 1975. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Li (1975. ed.).
-------- 1979a. On Understanding Grammar. London.
-------- 1979b. ed. Syntax and Semantics 12. Academic Press, New York.
-------- 1984. Syntax. A Functional.Typological Intorduction. Vol 1. Benjamins. Amsterdam /
Philadlephia.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of
meaningful elements. In Universals of Language. Ed. Greenberg J. The MIT Press,
Cambridge.
Hakulinen, Auli & Fred Karlsson & Maria Vilkuna 1980. Suomen tekstilauseiden piirteitä:
kvantitatiivinen tutkimus. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics, University
of Helsinki.
Li, Charles & Sandra A. Thompson 1975a. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Li
(1975 Ed.).
------- 1975b, toim. Word Order and Word order Change. University of Texas Press, Austin.
-------- 1979. Third-person pronoun and zero anaphora in Chinese discourse. In Givón (1979 Ed.).
Shopen, Timothy, 1987. Ed. Language typology and syntactic description I – III. Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.