Economic Development With Unlimited Supplies of Labour
Economic Development With Unlimited Supplies of Labour
SUMMARY
W. Arthur Lewis, in his article, inspires his readers while presenting the idea that
with the unlimited supplies of labor, economy develops. The neo-classical model that
includes the Keynesian applies to the economy and noted that it gives a wrong result. It
subsistence wage. Subsistence agriculture, casual labour, petty trade, domestic service,
wives and daughters in the house, and the increase of population are the primary
sources form which the workers come as economic development proceeds. It is revealed
that if the country is overpopulated relatively to its natural resources, the marginal
productivity of the labour is inconsiderable, zero, or even negative. This is true to most
determination of the subsistence wage at which this surplus labour is available for
employment. This can also level to the average product per man in subsistence
Raising the share of profits in the national income in the result of the capital
formation and technical progress. It is not actually the raising of wages. It is because the
capitalist profits are low relatively to national income, the savings are low. It is the
creation. Why? It is because the real cost of capital created by inflation is zero in this
model, and this capital is just as useful as what is created in more respectable fashion,
On the other hand, inflation for the purpose of getting hold of resources for war
may be cumulative, but inflation for the purpose of creating productive capital is self-
destructive. There is this movement that will occur. Prices rise as the capital is created,
But, if asked this can still be expanded, no capitalist sector can expand these ways
indefinitely, since capital accumulation can proceed faster than population can grow.
When the time surplus is drained, wages begin to rise above the subsistence level.
In addition, mass immigration of unskilled labour might even raise output per
head, but its effect would be to keep wages in all countries near the subsistence level of
the poorest countries. The export of capital lessens capital formation at home, and so
keeps wages down. This is an offset if the capital export cheapens the things which
workers import, or raises wage costs in competing countries. But it is aggravated if the
capital export raises the cost of imports or reduces costs in competing countries.
In addition, it is revealed in the article that the importation of foreign capital does
not raise real wages in countries which have surplus labour, unless the capital results in
increased productivity in the commodities which they produce for their own
consumption. Top reasons why tropical commercial produce is so cheap, in terms of the
standard of living it affords, is the inefficiency of tropical food production per man.
Practically all the benefit of increasing efficiency in export industries goes to the foreign
consumer; whereas raising efficiency in subsistence food production would
Lastly, the Law of Comparative Costs is just as valid in countries with surplus
labour as it is in others. But whereas in the latter it is valid foundation of arguments for
free trade, in the former it is an equally valid foundation of arguments for protection.
REACTION
This article somehow gives the hint that human resource is highly needed,
I think, this is the secret of the foreign countries. Most of the progressive
countries are those that are hiring a lot of workers. Because they don’t have a lot of
hands in their country production, because population growth is very poor, they are
enticing those countries having more workers to work in their country. One concrete
example is the reason of having our overseas Filipino workers to land on different jobs
there.
It is indeed true that subsistence agriculture, casual labour, petty trade, domestic
service, wives and daughters in the house, and the increase of population are the
primary sources form which the workers come as economic development proceeds.
I hope this could also be the point of reference to the future economies, in the
Philippines, primarily, to not waste the labor force, for it is mainly the topmost key for
2. What could be the barriers why even that we have so much of skilled laborers, our
country still suffers the slow growth of economy, and may be the reason why
3. Could there be more efficient system to adapt in the Philippines to retrieve our