Scribd
Upload
100 views2 pages

Elc550: English For Academic Writing Assessment Ii - 15% Oral Presentation and Poster Scoresheet

This document contains scoring sheets for an oral presentation and poster presentation assessment. The oral presentation is worth 10% and will be scored out of 10 based on the presentation of content, use of language, and delivery. The poster presentation is worth 5% and will be scored out of 25 based on the clarity and quality of content, organization, and visual design. Students will receive individual scores for each assessment component that contribute to their overall score for this assignment.

Uploaded by

nana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100 views2 pages

Elc550: English For Academic Writing Assessment Ii - 15% Oral Presentation and Poster Scoresheet

This document contains scoring sheets for an oral presentation and poster presentation assessment. The oral presentation is worth 10% and will be scored out of 10 based on the presentation of content, use of language, and delivery. The poster presentation is worth 5% and will be scored out of 25 based on the clarity and quality of content, organization, and visual design. Students will receive individual scores for each assessment component that contribute to their overall score for this assignment.

Uploaded by

nana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ELC550: ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC WRITING

ASSESSMENT II – 15%
ORAL PRESENTATION AND POSTER SCORESHEET

Matric Number Name Oral Presentation (10%) Poster (5%)

Poster Presentation (5%)

Descriptors Poor (1) Fair (2) Average (3) Good (4) Excellent (5)
Content
Clarity of content (clearly identified ideas and details) 1 2 3 4 5

Quality of content (informative and thought-provoking) 1 2 3 4 5

Currency and relevancy of ideas (most current and relevant) 1 2 3 4 5

Organisation
Well-organized layout (easy to grasp & captures interest) 1 2 3 4 5

Attractive (appropriate font size and use of visuals 1 2 3 4 5

Poster Evaluation: Total : ______ / 25 x 5 = _______

RATING SCALE FOR ELC550 ORAL PRESENTATION OF ARTICLE ANALYSIS (10 MARKS)
Marks Descriptors
9-10 Excellent presentation of the topic, main idea and supporting details. Critical opinions and insights are clearly incorporated into the topic.
Excellent language for academic presentation. Displays a high degree of grammatical accuracy and fluency. There are virtually no errors
in word formation. A wide range of sentence structures and vocabulary is used eloquently.
Excellent delivery with outstanding use of eye contact, vocal variety (rate, pitch, pauses, volume) and visual aids. No reading from text.
7-8 Good presentation of the topic, main idea and supporting details. Critical opinions and insights are clearly incorporated into the topic.
Good use of language for academic presentation. Displays a relatively high degree of grammatical accuracy and fluency. There are very
few errors in word formation. A wide range of sentence structures and vocabulary is used effectively.
Good delivery with sound use of eye contact, vocal variety (rate, pitch, pauses, volume) and visual aids. Hardly reading from text.
5-6 Average presentation of the topic, main idea and supporting details. Critical opinions and insights are incorporated into the topic.
Average use of language for academic presentation. Displays some degree of grammatical accuracy and fluency. There are some errors
in word formation. A fair range of sentence structures and vocabulary is moderately used.

Fair delivery with satisfactory use of eye contact, vocal variety (rate, pitch, pauses, volume) and visual aids. Occasional reading from text.

3-4 Poor presentation of the topic, main idea and supporting details. Critical opinions and insights are unclear.
Limited use of language for academic presentation. Displays a low degree of grammatical accuracy and fluency. There are many errors in
word formation. A limited range of sentence structures and vocabulary.

Poor delivery with limited use of eye contact, vocal variety (rate, pitch, pauses, volume) and visual aids. Frequently reading from text.

1-2 Very weak presentation of the topic, main idea and supporting details. Critical opinions and insights are missing.
Poor use of language for academic presentation. Displays a very low degree of grammatical accuracy and fluency. There are major errors
in word formation. A limited range of sentence structures and vocabulary.

Extremely poor delivery, with very limited use of eye contact, vocal variety (rate, pitch, pauses, volume) and visual aids. Completely
reading from text.

You might also like