Scribd
Upload
84 views

0934 Common Problems With Primary Data Collection and Possible

Common problems with primary data collection include interviewers lacking knowledge, information being incomplete or inaccurate, questionnaires neglecting key issues, and interviewers and informants becoming biased or bored. To minimize these problems, the document recommends collecting data using an appropriate approach, thoroughly reviewing secondary data to ensure relevance, training interviewers well, not overloading interviewers in a single day, regularly discussing impressions among the assessment team, using a variety of informants including women and men, and triangulating information from diverse sources.

Uploaded by

Muktadur Rahman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
84 views

0934 Common Problems With Primary Data Collection and Possible

Common problems with primary data collection include interviewers lacking knowledge, information being incomplete or inaccurate, questionnaires neglecting key issues, and interviewers and informants becoming biased or bored. To minimize these problems, the document recommends collecting data using an appropriate approach, thoroughly reviewing secondary data to ensure relevance, training interviewers well, not overloading interviewers in a single day, regularly discussing impressions among the assessment team, using a variety of informants including women and men, and triangulating information from diverse sources.

Uploaded by

Muktadur Rahman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

COMMON PROBLEMS WITH PRIMARY DATA COLLECTION AND

POSSIBLE ‘SOLUTIONS’

Common problems:

Interviewers lack knowledge or skills

Information is incomplete or inaccurate

Questionnaires or checklists neglect key issues

Interviewers and informants are biased

Interviewers and informants become bored

Informants experience assessment fatigue

Any of the problems described in this box could result in inaccurate and
unreliable information. If this is fed into the analysis system the final
conclusions may be misleading and the recommendations inappropriate.

In order to minimize these problems, the following principles should be


observed:

• Collect primary information using an approach that is appropriate to the


assessment objectives, the context and the skills of the personnel carrying out
the fieldwork.

• Undertake thorough secondary data review to ensure that questionnaires and


checklists are as relevant as possible, and that they address fully the specific
objectives of the IA.

• Train the enumerators and interviewers well. Ensure that they are able to ask
questions in a non-leading and sensitive way, to probe during interviews and
to triangulate information. Ensure that interviewers have a thorough
knowledge of the context and the issues to be discussed, so that they know
what to look for and are alert to unusual information.

• Do not try to carry out too many interviews in one day. It is better to
undertake a few high-quality interviews than many interviews that produce
inaccurate and incomplete data.

• Discuss impressions and conclusions regularly among the assessment team,


at least once a day during the fieldwork.

• Use a variety of informants. Ensure that the perspectives of both women and
men are included.

• Triangulate the information. If information from diverse sources converges, it


is likely to be accurate; if it is inconsistent or diverges, it is likely that at least
one of the sources is providing inaccurate information, or that perspectives
differ across the sample.

Sources: adapted from http://www.wfp.org/content/emergency-food-security-


assessment-handbook

You might also like